Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
A presentation descripes tumors,pathogensis,devlopment,antigenes and genes.
how host responds to them and how tumors evade immunity with latest lines of therapy and prevention.
facaulity of pharmacy.Damascus university.master of libaratory diagnossis. immunology.
Baraa ALomar and feras deban
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
A presentation descripes tumors,pathogensis,devlopment,antigenes and genes.
how host responds to them and how tumors evade immunity with latest lines of therapy and prevention.
facaulity of pharmacy.Damascus university.master of libaratory diagnossis. immunology.
Baraa ALomar and feras deban
CTLA-4: IMMUNE CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE THERAPY,,,, THE 2018 NOBEL PRIZE WINNING STUDY IN THE FIELD OF PHYSIOLOGY/ MEDICINE,,, JOINTLY AWARDED TO JAMES P. ALLISON OF USA and TASAKU HONJU OF JAPAN .
Immuno-Oncology: An Evolving Approach to Cancer Care
Review a downloadable slide deck by Thomas F. Gajewski, MD, PhD, covering the most clinically relevant new data reported from Immuno-Oncology: An Evolving Approach to Cancer Care.
Target Audience
This activity is designed to meet the educational needs of oncologists and other healthcare professionals involved in cancer care.
Format: Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt) | File size: 26.2 MB | Date posted: 6/20/2012
Slide Deck Disclaimer
This slide deck in its original and unaltered format is for educational purposes and is current as of June 2012. All materials contained herein reflect the views of the faculty, and not those of IMER, the CE provider, or the commercial supporter. These materials may discuss therapeutic products that have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and off-label uses of approved products. Readers should not rely on this information as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk, and readers should verify the prescribing information and all data before treating patients or employing any therapeutic products described in this educational activity.
Usage Rights
This slide deck is provided for educational purposes and individual slides may be used for personal, non-commercial presentations only if the content and references remain unchanged. No part of this slide deck may be published in print or electronically as a promotional or certified educational activity without prior written permission from IMER. Additional terms may apply. See Terms of Service on IMERonline.com for details.
A detailed ppt about cancer immunotherapy.
includes:-
Immunosurveillance and Immunoediting
Dentritic cell vaccines
Antibody therapy
Combined therapy
immune blockades
Cytokine therapy
T cell therapy
Include latest research finding about therapy.
IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TUMORS-Humoral immunity
-Cellular Immunity- Failure of Host Defenses
- Evasion of Immune Responses by Tumors
- Cancer Immunosurveillance vs Immunoediting- Immunotherapy
In this webinar:
Dr. Michele Ardolino, Assistant Professor at the University of Ottawa, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology and Scientist Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, discusses: The body has a phenomenal weapon to fight infections and cancer: the immune system. This seminar focuses on how the immune system recognizes and shapes cancer and on how research in tumor immunology led to the development of life-saving and revolutionizing immuno-therapies.
The webinar is followed by a question & answer session.
View the video:
https://youtu.be/-a7DfHT8dU8
To learn more about CCSN, visit us at survivornet.ca
Follow CCSN on social media:
Twitter - https://twitter.com/survivornetca
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CanadianSurv...
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/survivornet...
Pinterest - https://www.pinterest.com/survivornet...
More information about this activity can be found here: http://bit.ly/ST0uRp
Chairperson
Jedd D. Wolchok, MD, PhD
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Faculty
Antoni Ribas, MD, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
Mary L. Disis, MD
University of Washington School of Medicine
Charles G. Drake, MD, PhD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
John Powderly II, MD, CPI
Carolina BioOncology Institute, PLLC
Cancer Therapy & Research Center
Activity Overview
Advances in basic immunology have led to an improved understanding of the interactions between the immune system and tumors, generating renewed interest in novel immunologic approaches to the treatment of cancer. Indeed, there have been multiple FDA approvals of immunologic agents in recent years and there are many ongoing trials of novel immunotherapies in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and other tumor types.
In this series of half-day conferences, leading oncologists will provide an overview of immune system–cancer interactions, the safety and efficacy of recently approved immunologic agents for the treatment of melanoma and prostate cancer, the latest data from ongoing trials in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and others, and the management of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). These sessions will include case studies to stimulate interactive discussion of real-world treatment scenarios.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to:
• Describe the biological foundations of immunotherapy approaches to the
treatment of cancer
• Identify the mechanisms of action of immuno-oncologic agents such as
vaccines and immune system-modulating antibodies
• Evaluate new safety and efficacy data on recently approved and emerging
immunotherapies across tumor types
• Describe how new immunotherapies are integrated into existing treatment
evidence-based guidelines
• Identify ongoing research efforts in immuno-oncology including how to
appropriately select patients who would be candidates for clinical trials
More information about this activity can be found here: http://bit.ly/ST0uRp
Tumor, Tumor immunology, cancer, hallmarks of cancer, carcinoma, lymphoma, metastasis, malignant, benign, angiogenesis, oncogenes and cancer induction, kuby detailed study quick revision, proto-oncogenes, tumor antigens, antibody, experiments for tumor antigens, methods for characterization of TSTA, Immunoediting, Current research n new approaches, monoclonal antibody
Cancer Immunotherapies (Focus on Melanoma & Lung Cancers)Zeena Nackerdien
Effective immunotherapy i.e. enlisting the patient’s own immune system to fight disease may mark a milestone in the fight against certain cancers. Three lymphocytes – T cells, B cells and NK-cells – involved in specific immune responses against cancers and other diseases. T cells recognize specific antigens via a T-cell antigen-receptor. The two main types of T cells, CD4- and CD8 T-cells, are categorized according to their respective CD4 and CD8 surface markers. The latter group includes cytotoxic T cells, also known as killer T lymphocytes. These cells kill invading pathogens or other disease-causing agents. Scientists discovered that a type of protein receptor, cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4), prevented T cells from launching immune attacks [1]. In the early 1990s, another “brake” was discovered in dying T cells namely programmed death 1 or PD-1. The rationale underlying cancer immunotherapy is that exposing CTLA-4, PD-1 or using other appropriate immune-system-based therapies may enable the activation of the immune system to destroy cancer.
Genetically engineering a patient’s T cells to target tumor cells marked one of the promising turning points in cancer immunotherapy, particularly for certain blood cancers and solid tumors. Melanoma and lung cancer, two often-fatal diseases, are treatable in the early stages with surgery or other standards of care. However, some patients are diagnosed during the later stages of the disease or relapse with refractory/unresectable tumors. For these subgroups, the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) tailored algorithms coupled with systemic treatment options, including immunotherapies, could potentially improve outcomes. Here, I summarize the latest approved immunotherapies mentioned in the NCCN guidelines, along with other examples of investigational agents such as monoclonal antibodies, cancer vaccines, and natural killer cells. Additional examples of targeted therapies, novel “druggable” and other immunotargets are presented in the section, ”Future Directions.”
Reference
1. Couzin-Frankel, J., Breakthrough of the year 2013. Cancer immunotherapy. Science, 2013. 342(6165): p. 1432-3.
CTLA-4: IMMUNE CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE THERAPY,,,, THE 2018 NOBEL PRIZE WINNING STUDY IN THE FIELD OF PHYSIOLOGY/ MEDICINE,,, JOINTLY AWARDED TO JAMES P. ALLISON OF USA and TASAKU HONJU OF JAPAN .
Immuno-Oncology: An Evolving Approach to Cancer Care
Review a downloadable slide deck by Thomas F. Gajewski, MD, PhD, covering the most clinically relevant new data reported from Immuno-Oncology: An Evolving Approach to Cancer Care.
Target Audience
This activity is designed to meet the educational needs of oncologists and other healthcare professionals involved in cancer care.
Format: Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt) | File size: 26.2 MB | Date posted: 6/20/2012
Slide Deck Disclaimer
This slide deck in its original and unaltered format is for educational purposes and is current as of June 2012. All materials contained herein reflect the views of the faculty, and not those of IMER, the CE provider, or the commercial supporter. These materials may discuss therapeutic products that have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and off-label uses of approved products. Readers should not rely on this information as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk, and readers should verify the prescribing information and all data before treating patients or employing any therapeutic products described in this educational activity.
Usage Rights
This slide deck is provided for educational purposes and individual slides may be used for personal, non-commercial presentations only if the content and references remain unchanged. No part of this slide deck may be published in print or electronically as a promotional or certified educational activity without prior written permission from IMER. Additional terms may apply. See Terms of Service on IMERonline.com for details.
A detailed ppt about cancer immunotherapy.
includes:-
Immunosurveillance and Immunoediting
Dentritic cell vaccines
Antibody therapy
Combined therapy
immune blockades
Cytokine therapy
T cell therapy
Include latest research finding about therapy.
IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TUMORS-Humoral immunity
-Cellular Immunity- Failure of Host Defenses
- Evasion of Immune Responses by Tumors
- Cancer Immunosurveillance vs Immunoediting- Immunotherapy
In this webinar:
Dr. Michele Ardolino, Assistant Professor at the University of Ottawa, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology and Scientist Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, discusses: The body has a phenomenal weapon to fight infections and cancer: the immune system. This seminar focuses on how the immune system recognizes and shapes cancer and on how research in tumor immunology led to the development of life-saving and revolutionizing immuno-therapies.
The webinar is followed by a question & answer session.
View the video:
https://youtu.be/-a7DfHT8dU8
To learn more about CCSN, visit us at survivornet.ca
Follow CCSN on social media:
Twitter - https://twitter.com/survivornetca
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/CanadianSurv...
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/survivornet...
Pinterest - https://www.pinterest.com/survivornet...
More information about this activity can be found here: http://bit.ly/ST0uRp
Chairperson
Jedd D. Wolchok, MD, PhD
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Faculty
Antoni Ribas, MD, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
Mary L. Disis, MD
University of Washington School of Medicine
Charles G. Drake, MD, PhD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
John Powderly II, MD, CPI
Carolina BioOncology Institute, PLLC
Cancer Therapy & Research Center
Activity Overview
Advances in basic immunology have led to an improved understanding of the interactions between the immune system and tumors, generating renewed interest in novel immunologic approaches to the treatment of cancer. Indeed, there have been multiple FDA approvals of immunologic agents in recent years and there are many ongoing trials of novel immunotherapies in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and other tumor types.
In this series of half-day conferences, leading oncologists will provide an overview of immune system–cancer interactions, the safety and efficacy of recently approved immunologic agents for the treatment of melanoma and prostate cancer, the latest data from ongoing trials in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and others, and the management of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). These sessions will include case studies to stimulate interactive discussion of real-world treatment scenarios.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to:
• Describe the biological foundations of immunotherapy approaches to the
treatment of cancer
• Identify the mechanisms of action of immuno-oncologic agents such as
vaccines and immune system-modulating antibodies
• Evaluate new safety and efficacy data on recently approved and emerging
immunotherapies across tumor types
• Describe how new immunotherapies are integrated into existing treatment
evidence-based guidelines
• Identify ongoing research efforts in immuno-oncology including how to
appropriately select patients who would be candidates for clinical trials
More information about this activity can be found here: http://bit.ly/ST0uRp
Tumor, Tumor immunology, cancer, hallmarks of cancer, carcinoma, lymphoma, metastasis, malignant, benign, angiogenesis, oncogenes and cancer induction, kuby detailed study quick revision, proto-oncogenes, tumor antigens, antibody, experiments for tumor antigens, methods for characterization of TSTA, Immunoediting, Current research n new approaches, monoclonal antibody
Cancer Immunotherapies (Focus on Melanoma & Lung Cancers)Zeena Nackerdien
Effective immunotherapy i.e. enlisting the patient’s own immune system to fight disease may mark a milestone in the fight against certain cancers. Three lymphocytes – T cells, B cells and NK-cells – involved in specific immune responses against cancers and other diseases. T cells recognize specific antigens via a T-cell antigen-receptor. The two main types of T cells, CD4- and CD8 T-cells, are categorized according to their respective CD4 and CD8 surface markers. The latter group includes cytotoxic T cells, also known as killer T lymphocytes. These cells kill invading pathogens or other disease-causing agents. Scientists discovered that a type of protein receptor, cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4), prevented T cells from launching immune attacks [1]. In the early 1990s, another “brake” was discovered in dying T cells namely programmed death 1 or PD-1. The rationale underlying cancer immunotherapy is that exposing CTLA-4, PD-1 or using other appropriate immune-system-based therapies may enable the activation of the immune system to destroy cancer.
Genetically engineering a patient’s T cells to target tumor cells marked one of the promising turning points in cancer immunotherapy, particularly for certain blood cancers and solid tumors. Melanoma and lung cancer, two often-fatal diseases, are treatable in the early stages with surgery or other standards of care. However, some patients are diagnosed during the later stages of the disease or relapse with refractory/unresectable tumors. For these subgroups, the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) tailored algorithms coupled with systemic treatment options, including immunotherapies, could potentially improve outcomes. Here, I summarize the latest approved immunotherapies mentioned in the NCCN guidelines, along with other examples of investigational agents such as monoclonal antibodies, cancer vaccines, and natural killer cells. Additional examples of targeted therapies, novel “druggable” and other immunotargets are presented in the section, ”Future Directions.”
Reference
1. Couzin-Frankel, J., Breakthrough of the year 2013. Cancer immunotherapy. Science, 2013. 342(6165): p. 1432-3.
Basics of kidney_transplant and donor_recepient evaluationJosephN7
This contains basic information on kidney transplant, benefits of transplant , donor_recepient evaluation, immunosuppressive drugs and risk factors
for update on my new presentations follow and leave a comment on any topic.
follow me on social media for related content (IG "mulebajoseph" and Pinterest "Joseph N Muleba" twitter "joseph n muleba"
Best liver transplant doctors in Delhi,India at affordable pricesSanjay Negi
http://www.delhilivertransplant.com provides liver transplant treatment in Delhi, India. Our doctors look into various causes for liver transplant like cirrhosis, Hepatitis B. The department is lead by Dr Sanjay Singh Negi who blogs at http://www.drsanjaynegi.com
Heart Transplantation in India, Delhi by expert surgeon Dr. Kewal Krishan. If you have know more information visit us www.kewalkrishan.com or call 91-9650300500 . Patients should receive maximal medical therapy before being considered for transplantation. They should also be considered for alternative surgical therapies including CABG, valve repair / replacement, cardiac septalplasty, etc
Rational use of blood componenets and Safe blood-2.pptxZahid Noor Jan
A very detailed presentation about blood safe transfusions. Blood components, RCC, Platelets, FFPs, its indications, precautions, problems, complications etc.
2021 laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases dr.ihsan alsaimarydr.Ihsan alsaimary
2021 laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases
dr. ihsan alsaimary
university of basrah - college of medicine- DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY
POBOX 696 ASHAR
BASRAH 42001
IRAQ
Src jbbr-21-125 Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL M...dr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Src jbbr-20-120 Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL M...dr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Doi10.18535ijmsciv7i11.06 Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary PROFESSOR I...dr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Assessment of immunomolecular_expression_and_prognostic_role_of_tlr7_among_pa...dr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Estimation of Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICR...dr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Tolerance & autoimmunity and organ specific autoimmune diseasesdr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Pathogenesis of microbial infections dr. ihsan alsaimarydr.Ihsan alsaimary
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Dr. ihsan edan abdulkareem alsaimary
PROFESSOR IN MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
ihsanalsaimary@gmail.com
mobile : 009647801410838
university of basrah - college of medicine - basrah -IRAQ
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...Sujoy Dasgupta
Dr Sujoy Dasgupta presented the study on "Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility? – The unexplored stories of non-consummation" in the 13th Congress of the Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction (ASPIRE 2024) at Manila on 24 May, 2024.
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system
It is a walnut-sized gland that forms part of the male reproductive system and is located in front of the rectum and just below the urinary bladder
Function is to store and secrete a clear, slightly alkaline fluid that constitutes 10-30% of the volume of the seminal fluid that along with the spermatozoa, constitutes semen
A healthy human prostate measures (4cm-vertical, by 3cm-horizontal, 2cm ant-post ).
It surrounds the urethra just below the urinary bladder. It has anterior, median, posterior and two lateral lobes
It’s work is regulated by androgens which are responsible for male sex characteristics
Generalised disease of the prostate due to hormonal derangement which leads to non malignant enlargement of the gland (increase in the number of epithelial cells and stromal tissue)to cause compression of the urethra leading to symptoms (LUTS
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Anti ulcer drugs and their Advance pharmacology ||
Anti-ulcer drugs are medications used to prevent and treat ulcers in the stomach and upper part of the small intestine (duodenal ulcers). These ulcers are often caused by an imbalance between stomach acid and the mucosal lining, which protects the stomach lining.
||Scope: Overview of various classes of anti-ulcer drugs, their mechanisms of action, indications, side effects, and clinical considerations.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stockrebeccabio
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
Telegram: bmksupplier
signal: +85264872720
threema: TUD4A6YC
You can contact me on Telegram or Threema
Communicate promptly and reply
Free of customs clearance, Double Clearance 100% pass delivery to USA, Canada, Spain, Germany, Netherland, Poland, Italy, Sweden, UK, Czech Republic, Australia, Mexico, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan.Door to door service
Hot Selling Organic intermediates
2. Transplantation
Summary
Trends in Survival after transplant
Donor and Recipient preparation
HLA Matching
Surgical Procedure
Rejection diagnosis and treatment
Immunosuppression
Infectious complications after Transplant
Other complications after Transplant
Kidney Pancreas Update
Immunology and Tolerance
3. Scope of problem
300,000 dialysis patients in US
55,000 patients on waiting List
17,000 recovered kidneys per year
11000 from “deceased donors”
6000 from living related donors
1000 kidneys not used after recovery
Average waiting time 5 years !
4. History of Transplants
1950’s First attempted in Twins
Still rejected due to minor antigen differences
1960’s First success
Imuran and Prednisone, ATG
1983 Cyclosporine A introduced
Dramatic improvement in graft survival
Opened the era for success in Heart, lung,
liver and other arenas.
5. Survival after Transplant
2003
Patient Survival 1 yr
LRD 98%
DD 95
Allograft Survival 1 yr
LRD 95%
DD 89
Allograft half-life
LRD 21 years
5 yrs
LRD 91 %
DD 81
5 years
LRD 76%
DD 61
DD 13.8 years
6. Transplant survival
Relative risk of death
Transplanted in 1993 = 1.0
Transplanted in 1998 = 0.74
Currently on Wait list = 1.7
These are the healthy ones!
Patients not on wait list = 2.6
7. Trends in Transplantation
Overall Mortality is unchanged!
Death with functioning graft increasing
Donor Age older
Recipient age is older
Time on waiting list is longer
Older, sicker patients are getting
transplants
8. Transplant Update
Annual Death Rates
Pts on list 6.3 %
Diabetic pts on list 10.8 %
Pts not on list 21 %
Note that “death censored graft loss” is
standard measure used in transplant
outcome reports since this is desired
outcome.
9. Donor Criteria
Living related preferred
Living unrelated next
Deceased Donor means longer wait
Brain death required
No Infection
No malignancy (except CNS lymphoma)
Preferrably under 60 years old
Normal renal function
10. Recipient Preparation
Dialysis or near Dialysis
GFR < 15 ml/min
Compliant with meds and treatment
Screen for infection, malignancy
Blood tests and colonoscopy
Screen for Heart Disease
Higher risk for dialysis pts
25 y.o. on dialysis has same risk as 55 y.o.
Risk for dialysis pt 10 fold higher at any age.
11. Surgical Transplantation
Procedure time 2 - 4 hours
Hernia incision to expose Iliac A and V,
extend to expose bladder
Retroperitoneal so recovery time from
surgery is minimal
Anastomose Artery and Vein
Tunnel ureter into bladder
Lich, Ledbetter
12. Surgical Transplantation
The native kidneys are left intact
Unless problems with infection, HTN
Allograft is easy to palpate, biopsy
Ureter length is kept short
Where does the ureter get its blood supply?
13. Surgical Transplantation
The native kidneys are left intact
Unless problems with infection, HTN
Allograft is easy to palpate, biopsy
Ureter length is kept short
Dual Blood supply from renal artery and from
cystic artery. Ischemic ureter leads to
stricture or leak.
Warm ischemia time is kept to < 45 min
Cold ischemia time up to 72 hours!
14. Surgical Transplantation
Typical Scenario:
Multiple organ donor identified, blood typed
Organ recovery team takes abdominal organs
first, heart and lungs last. (bone skin corneas
may be taken after heart stops).
Organs are perfused and stored in
preservative solution
Mixture of high K, antioxidants
Kept cold on ice.
Lymph Nodes, spleen used for HLA typing
16. Surgical Transplantation
UNOS master list used to determine where
organs sent, which pts are best match
Primary patient, plus a standby are called
Crossmatch takes 6 hours
Standby used if CM + or primary not available
A single Txp team could then do
SPK first (4-6 hours)
Liver next (8-12 hours)
Kidney last (2-4 hours)
17. Risk of Graft Loss
Higher risk
Deceased donor
Recipient over 60
Donor over 60
Recipient race
Black / Hispanic
Long Cold Ischemic
time
Previous Txp
High PRA
Lower Risk
Living donor
Recipient under 60
Donor under 60
Recipient race
Asian
Short cold ischemia
Higher HLA match
Low PRA
18. Expanded Donor Kidneys
Used when risk of Txp is better than life
expectancy on dialysis
Criteria
Recipient/donor over 60
Diabetics over 40
Failing access for dialysis
Patient with poor Quality of Life
19. Transplant Update
HLA Matching
Main HLA groups A B C D
C not important for transplant survival
Host of minor antigens
Most important antigens are B and D
A and B are constitutive (always expressed)
D antigen is inducible and responsible for
more serious (vascular) rejections when it
gets expressed.
20. Waiting list management
Point system for UNOS Wait list
1 pt per year on list
7 pts for 0 mismatch with B, DR antigens
5 pts for 1 mm with B, DR
2 pts for 2 mm with B, DR
4 pts for match in pt with PRA > 80 %
4 pts for Age < 11, 3 pts for age 11-18
National sharing of 0 mismatch kidneys
17-20 % of all transplants
21. Transplant Costs
Cost:
Kidney Txp: $ 60,000
Islet cells 53,000
Panc Txp alone 105,000
SPK (K-P) 130,000
Each year on dialysis: $27,000
LOS for uncomplicated Kidney:
5-7 days
26. Rejection
Differential Diagnosis
Not all ARF is rejection!
Drug toxicity
Ureter complication
Renal Artery Stenosis
Contrast, Aminoglycoside toxicity
Tubulo-interstitial Nephritis
Pre or Post renal causes
Recurrent disease (late)
27. Pattern of Acute Renal Failure
after Transplant
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1st
Month
2nd to
6th
6 to 12 after 12
rejection
Drug tox
surgical
ATN
Recurrent
Relative
frequency
Month after transplant
28. Rejection
4 Types:
Hyperacute (preformed antibody)
Screened for with Lymphocyte crossmatch
Immediate/on the OR table
Rare due to testing
ADCC
Antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity
1-4 days post op
Rare occurance.
29. Rejection
4 Types:
Acute
Most common
Due to Antigen presentation to an awakened
immune system
Cellular or Vascular
Delayed Type or Chronic Rejection
Must be differentiated from drug nephrotoxicity
30. Rejection and Complement
Circulating Proteins in blood:
#1 Albumin
#2 Immunoglobulin
#3 Complement, esp C 3.
Triggers of Complement fixation
Ischemia reperfusion injury (IP - 10)
Brain injury in donor
Dialysis after transplant
Infection
31. Basic Immunology
Antigen presenting cells
Macrophages
Mesangial cells
Dendritic/Kupfer cells
Reticuloendothelial system (RES)
Endothelial cells and others once injured
D antigen expression
32. Basic Immunology
Cell mediated Immunity
Antigens:
Viruses, fungi, parasites, intracellular organisms
T cell lymphocytes
Cytotoxic
Directly attack and kill APC, Organism usually
Helper/ inducer cells
Recruit more immune cells to respond
IL-1 and IL-2
Suppressor cells
Feedback to modulate immune response
Important for tolerance.
33. Basic Immunology
Humoral / Neutrophil system
Parallel to Cell mediated system
Antigens:
Usually bacterial cell polysaccharide
Antibodies
Produced by B lymphocytes
May be specific or nonspecific
IgG, IgM, others
34. Basic Immunology
Humoral / Neutrophil system
Immune complex formation
Occurs when Antigen fixed by antibody
Specificity of ab for ag determines size and solubility
of Immune complex formed
• Immune complex fixes complement
• Complement activation increases clearance of
I-C by spleen, etc
• C3b chemotactic factor for PMN’s
• PMN’s attack with lysozyme
35. Basic Immunology
Antigen Presenting Cell
Antigen plus HLA, coreceptors
Cell Mediated Humoral
Cytotoxic Helper Suppressor Memory
B cell
Fc receptor
comp C3b
Pmn’s
T lymphocytes
37. Immunology of Rejection
HLA A and B are constitutive antigens
HLA D is inducible antigen
Infection, ischemia induce D antigen
expression
D antigen expression leads to vascular
rejection which is worst type
How does Bactrim SS MWF help?
38. Immunology of Rejection
HLA A and B are constitutive antigens
HLA D is inducible antigen
Infection, ischemia induce D antigen
expression
D antigen expression leads to vascular
rejection which is worst type
Bactrim SS MWF reduces bacteriuria
39. Immunology of Rejection
HLA A and B are constitutive antigens
HLA D is inducible antigen
Infection, ischemia induce D antigen
expression
D antigen expression leads to vascular
rejection which is worst type
Bactrim SS MWF reduces bacteriuria
What is Acyclovir used for after Txp?
40. Immunology of Rejection
HLA A and B are constitutive antigens
HLA D is inducible antigen
Infection, ischemia induce D antigen
expression
D antigen expression leads to vascular
rejection which is worst type
Bactrim SS MWF reduces bacteriuria
Acyclovir reduces shedding of Herpes Simplex
virus in urine
42. Induction Immunosuppression
Biological Agents
OKT-3 rarely used
Thymoglobulin (rabbit)
ATG (polyclonal)
Basiliximab (Simulect) Chimeric
Anti CD 25/ anti IL-2 receptor monoclonal
Daclizumab (Zenapax) Humanized
Anti CD 25 Monoclonal
43. Induction Immunosuppression
Biological Agents
Expensive, complex to use
Use in high risk patients:
High PRA
Second transplant
African American recipient
Delayed Graft function
44. Induction Immunosuppression
Biological Agents
Basiliximab and Daclizumab
Anti CD 25 monoclonals
Do not deplete lymphocytes
Will not stop ongoing rejection
Other immunosuppression (CNI, steroid, MMF) should
continue during use
OKT-3, ATG
Deplete lymphocytes, stop rejection,
reduce or withhold other immunosuppression while in use
45. Induction Immunosuppression
New Biological Agents coming soon:
CTL4 Ig
stimulates CTL4 coreceptor on T cell which leads
to
Decreased activation
Apoptosis of the activated cell line
LEA 29 Y
a second generation CTL4 Ig
46. Regulation of T-Cell Activation
APC
T-Cell
CD 40
CTL4
Negative stimulatory
CD 80/86
CD 25
Positive stimulation
IL -2 Receptor
IL-2
49. Where the drugs work
Steroids:
Toxic to lymphocytes
Stops rejection
Inhibits release of IL-1 and IL-2
Inhibits chemotaxis
50. Where the drugs work
Cyclosporin A, Tacrilimus
Neoral, Prograf
Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI)
Multiple effects on proliferating immune cells
Inhibits m-RNA producing IL-2
Negligible effect on pre-sensitized cells
Does not stop ongoing rejection
51. Where the drugs work
Imuran, Cellcept
Antimetabolite – blocks purine synthesis
Interupt cell cycling/proliferation
G 1
S Phase
G 2
Mitosis
52. Where the drugs work
Rapamicin
Sirolimus
Calcineurin inhibitor with novel effects
Receptor is called TOR
Similar side effects to CYA and TAC
May be used in conjunction with TAC and CYA.
54. Drug Dosages
Steroid
10 mg daily or every other day
CyA
4-6 mg/Kg/day usually 100 - 150 BID
Levels 1-6 months: 250 - 400
Level after 6 months: 100 – 250
Imuran
50 – 100 mg daily at bedtime
55. Drug Dosages
Prograf
0.1 – 0.2 mg/kg/day
Usually about 5 mg BID
Levels 5-15 by ELISA
Rapamicin
6 mg po load then 2 mg po daily
Cellcept (MMF)
1000 mg BID, taper if low WBC or anemia, GI
intolerance.
57. Immunology of Rejection
Tolerance is the best immunosuppression
Has been known for years
First seen in pts treated with Steroids/Imuran
Patients present off all IS with stable renal
function, normal biopsy.
Cyclosporine seems to impair development of
tolerance
Has lead to research about T-Cell coreceptors
58. Tolerance Inducing Mechanisms
T- Cell deletion in Thymus
Thy – 1 cells lead to rejection
Peripheral T- Cell deletion
IL-2 dependent
FAS dependent
Veto Cells
So immune system activation is required but apoptosis is
favored over rejection
Peripheral Non-deletional mechanism
Anergy – loss of response to antigen
Thy 2 cells – regulatory/suppressor cell
59. Tolerance in Practice Today
For high PRA and Positive Crossmatch pts:
IVIG/plasmapheresis before and after TXP
Leads to decrease % Anti-donor antibody
After Txp, Antidonor Ab returns but does not
lead to rejection
Anergy
Increase in Bcl - 2
61. Complications of Transplant
Surgical
Drug Side Effects
Infections
Malignancies
Cardiovascular
Bone Disease/hypercalcemia
Polycythemia
When to remove the allograft
63. Complications of Transplant
Drug Side Effects
Hypertension
Diabetes
Hirsuitism
Tremor
Renal Failure
TTP
Anemia/marrow suppression
GI side effects N/V/D
64. Complications of Transplant
Infections
Pattern of infectious complications:
First 30 days
Period from 1 – 6 months
After 6 months
65. Complications of Transplant
Infections
First 30 days
Surgical complications
UTI, wound, IV sites
Pre-existing infections in recipient
C-Dif, CMV, Herpes simplex
Infection carried from donor
CMV, West Nile Virus
66. Complications of Transplant
Infections
Period from 1 – 6 months
Here There be Monsters
Could be anything
Need to be aggressive and thorough in approach
67. Complications of Transplant
Infections
After 6 months, again divides into 3 groups:
Low risk group
Low IS load, no serious rejection or infection
Will mirror general population for the most part.
High risk group
Serious or recurrent bouts of rejection
More prone to fungal, CMV infections
Chronic infection group
Need to consider withdrawal of Immunosuppression
Hepatitis B, C, Difficult CMV, Virus associated
Malignancy.
69. Complications after Transplant
Malignancy
Due to reduced immune Surveillance, chronic
virus affects
Most common is ?
Skin followed by
Colon
Lymphoma (Burkitt’s)
Hepatoma (Hep B)
70. Complications of Transplant
Hypertension
Correlates with Age
Diabetes
Race
Graft Function
CNI use
Steroids
Graft Survival reduced if hypertension +
71. Complications of Transplant
Hypertension
Target SBP < 130
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
Proteinuria
Target BP 125 / 75
Recommended Drugs:
B blockers
ACE inhibitors
CCB’s and diuretics as needed.
72. Complications of Transplant
New Onset Diabetes after Txp
NODAT
Decrease steroids if possible
Consider Change from TAC to CyA.
Cardiovascular Risk of a 25 y.o. recipient
Equal to the risk for a 55 y.o. without renal
disease.
10 fold higher at any age!
73. Complications of Transplant
Hyperlipidemia
Assume CV risk is present
LDL target < 100
Consider decreasing Steroids
Recommend changing CyA or Rapa to TAC.
Thrombin Activatable Fibrinolysis Inhibitor
TAFI levels are increased in Txp and Diabetes
Increase risk of DVT, Unstable Angina.
74. Complications of Transplant
Post Transplant Bone Disease
Osteoporosis in 40- 60 % of pts
BMD decreases 6-10 % per year
Fractures occurrence Rate
Diabetics: 40-50 %
Non diabetics: 10-15 %
Contributing Factors:
Renal osteodystrophy, Immunosuppressives
PTH, Age, Gender, Gonadal Status
75. Complications of Transplant
Post Transplant Bone Disease
Treatment
Calcium 1200 mg Daily
Vit D 400 – 800 mcg daily
Exercise, Tai Chi
Quit smoking!
Fosamax 70 mg week or 5 mg daily for 6-12
months.
Hypercalcemia also common
76. Complications of Transplant
Polycythemia
Due to extra erythropoietin production
High Hct, hypertensive
Treatment
Phlebotomy
ACE inhibitor use
77. When to remove Allograft
Allograft Nephrectomy is indicated:
Unusual – some pts have more than one
allograft!
For refractory infection
Most commonly for terminal rejection, after
graft has failed and pt is back on dialysis
FUO, FTT, may thrombose or rupture.
78. Transplantation
Summary
Trends in Survival after transplant
Donor and Recipient preparation
HLA Matching
Surgical Procedure
Rejection diagnosis and treatment
Immunosuppression
Infectious complications after Transplant
Other complications after Transplant
Kidney Pancreas Update
Immunology and Tolerance
80. Kidney – Pancreas Transplant
Rejection Diagnosis:
Hyperglycemia
May also occur in face of high steroids, sepsis
Increased serum amylase level
Decreased urine amylase level in bladder
anastomosis patients.
Maintenance immunosuppression
Tacrolimus/Cellcept preferred combo
Avoid steroids if possible
81. Kidney – Pancreas Transplant
Rejection rates improved
Options for pancreas placement:
Attach to bladder
Dumps lots of bicarb, Cystitis
Easy to identify rejection by measuring urine
amylase
Attach to intestine (enteric anastomosis)
Eliminates problems with acidosis and cystitis
Rejection harder to identify early.
82. Kidney – Pancreas Transplant
Surgical Complication rate 10% at 1 yr.
Immunologic Failure Rates:
Type of Txp % graft loss at 1 yr.
PAK 7 %
PTA 8
SPK 2
Gruessner, Clinical Transplantation 2002, p 52
83. Kidney – Pancreas Transplant
Effect of Pancreas Txp on outcomes
No significant QOL improvement compared to
kidney alone
Insulin free for diabetics 50 – 90 %
Neuropathy improves
Microvasculature improves
Retinopathy – no improvement
Survival improved compared to wait list pts
May be slightly better than kidney alone.
84. Ethnic Disparities in Transplant
Rate of transplantation lower than any
other ethnic group
% of AA patients hearing about the option
of transplant is only about 70% of other
groups
Rate of referral once they hear about
transplant is only about 70% of other
groups.
85. Ethnic Disparities in Transplant
Socioeconomic Factors:
70% of AA children born into single parent homes
Less likely to have insurance
Barriers to travelling to appts
Less likely to be available when called
No phone or won’t answer due to debtors
Higher PRA, fewer AA donors
Mistrust of system
86. Ethnic Disparities in Transplant
Insurance Impact on Transplant:
Compared to pts of other ethnic groups with
same insurance, 70-80 % of eligible AA pts
get to transplant
HMO rates 70-80 % of eligible pts get to
transplant, evenly across races
Example of Rationing by Inconvenience
Military patients demonstrate NO disparity in
rates of transplant or Graft survival.
87. Ethnic Disparities in Transplant
Immunologic Factors
Once transplanted, AA pts fare worse
AA with 0 MM does about as well as Caucasian
with 6 MM and 1 rejection episode in first year.
Require higher doses of Immunosuppression
Don’t tolerate steroid or other drug withdrawal
nearly as well as other groups
Higher levels of IL-6, CD-80, TGF-B, Endothelin,
Renin.
More Hypertensive, which worsens overall survival
88. Immunology of Rejection
The Future
Protein Tyrosine Kinases
Src
FAK
Paxillin
Akt
PPARS peroxisome proliferator activated
receptors
Ligands for PPARs tend to decrease inflammatory
response
Include Piaglitizone, Lopid
89. Immunology of Rejection
The Future
Chemokine receptors:
CXC R3 antibody prolongs graft survival in
monkey models
Also in clinical trials: CCR-1, CCR-5 which
bind CK’s and prevent activation of receptor.
Soluble Complement Receptor CR-1
Trypriline decreases synthesis of
complement
WY14643 ligand for PPAR
90. Immunology of Rejection
Chemoattractant Cytokines (chemokines)
Leukocyte recruitment
Most important CK is CXC
Receptor is CXC-R3
Transmembrane protein
Activation of CXC R3 activates rejection pathway
IP-10 Activates CXC R3
Both CXC R3 and IP-10 are present in urine of pts
who are rejecting