TOOTH CRAFT –
SKILL UNVEILED
Dr.Hyun Joong, BDS,
CHENNAI.
INTRODUCTION
 Fractures to the anterior teeth-trauma
 Minor to severe -vertical, diagonal or
horizontal fractures.
 Dental emergency
 Skill - career of every practitioner.
AIM
 Uncomplicated crown fractures
 Complicated crown fractures
 Crown root fractures
 Prevent tooth loss
 Improve cosmetic results
 Decrease risk of infection
CASE REPORT -1
ENAMELOPLASTY
COMPLAINTS
• 19 yr old male
• Broken upper front teeth
HISTORY
• Recent trauma to upper
front
teeth
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
• Fracture involving enamel in
11,21
DIAGNOSIS
TREATMENT
 Enamel reshaping
(ENAMELOPLASTY)
Thin tapering diamond
Finishing and polishing
Pre & Post treatment
photographs
CASE REPORT 2
REATTACHMENT OF
FRACTURED FRAGMENT
COMPLAINTS
• 25 yr old male patient broken upper front
teeth
• Brought the fractured fragment
HISTORY
• Trauma to upper front teeth on same day.
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
• Fracture involving enamel and dentin 11
DIAGNOSIS
• Ellis Class II fracture 11
TREATMENT PLAN
 Reattach fractured fragment.
PROCEDURE
 Tooth preparation done
 Fractured fragment was re-united using
Light Cure Composite Resin.
Pre & Post operative
photographs
CASE REPORT - 3
LAMINATE
RESTORATION
COMPLAINT
 18 yr old male patient
 Broken upper front teeth and
sensitivity
HISTORY
 Trauma to upper front tooth a month back.
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
 Fracture involving enamel in 11
 Fracture involving enamel, dentin in 21
 Vitality test-normal 11,21
DIAGNOSIS
 Ellis Class I Fracture 11
 Ellis Class II Fracture 21
 Enameloplasty – 11
 Laminate restoration with Glass
Ionomer Cement and Light Cure
Composite Resin - 21
TREATMENT PLAN
Pre & Post operative
photographs
CASE REPORT – 4
MANAGEMENT OF
VERTICAL FRACTURE
COMPLAINTS
 28 yr old female
 Broken upper front teeth with pain
HISTORY
 Injury on same day due to fall
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
 Vertical fracture Involving enamel,
dentin and pulp in 22 and evidence
of associated oblique fracture
involving pulp extending
subgingivally
DIAGNOSIS –
 Comminuted vertical & oblique
TREATMENT PLAN
STEP 1
Orthodontic banding
STEP 2
Access opened with the
band in place and
obturated using warm
sectional condensation
method
STEP 3
Band removed & Fracture
line reinforced with dual
cure composite
STEP 5
Tooth reduction done
STEP 7
Jacket crown luted in 22
Pre & Post Op
Photographs
CASE REPORT 5
REATTACHMENT
OF FRACTURED
TEETH
COMPLAINTS
 35 yr old male
 Broken upper front teeth with pain
HISTORY
 Trauma due to RTA on same
day.
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
 Fracture involving enamel, dentin & pulp in 11
 Oblique crown root fracture in 12,13 with fracture
line extending subgingivally below the alveolar
crest.
DIAGNOSIS
 Ellis Class III fracture 11
 Ellis class VI fracture 12,13
TREATMENT PLAN
STEP 2
Root canal treatment done in
11,12 and 13
STEP 1
Fractured crown extracted
STEP- 3
Flap raised surgically
STEP – 5
Surgical re-attachment of
fractured fragment done with
GIC
STEP - 4
Pre fabricated metal post
tried in and luted
STEP - 6
Flap re-positioned and
sutured
STEP – 7
Post operative X-ray
Pre-post operative
photographs
DISCUSSION
 Fractures involving enamel - Enameloplasty
 Fractured fragment available –re-attachment -
quick esthetic rehabilitation
 Crown fractures that involve only enamel or
both enamel and dentin should be tested for
vitality, before protecting the exposed dentin
with composite
 If reversible pulpitis is diagnosed, the pulp
should be protected from further insult by
providing a restoration that reduces
microleakage and prevents fracture from
propogating
DISCUSSION
 Modern dentin bonding materials serve as an
interim restoration providing occlusal
protection if prognosis is gaurded
 Examination of the fractured fragment allows
accurate assessment of the restorability of
teeth
 In cases the tooth is fractured but the fracture
is still incomplete, crown should be supported
with metal band, before RCT is commenced
Cont.
Cont.
 Fractures involving gingival crevice &
attachment may necessitate RCT to stop
bacterial contamination that is likely to
occur along the fracture line
o Longevity unknown – extraction
following treatment is a possibility
o Less esthetic –fragment dehydrated
o Need of continuous monitoring
SHORTCOMINGS OF RE-ATTACHMENT
PROCEDURES
ADVANTAGES
 Rapid
 Conservative
 Colour match
 Economical
 Positive emotional social response
from patient
CONCLUSION
A DENTIST MAY ONLY BE SOMEONE
IN THE WORLD,
UNTIL WE PROCEED AS THOUGH OUR
LIMITS
OF ABILITIES DO NOT EXIST,
WHEN WE RAISE OUR SIGHT AND SEE
OUR
POSSIBILITIES,
FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS LOST HIS SMILE,
WE MIGHT BE HIS LUMINOUS SUNSHINE,
IT’S THE POINT WHERE DENTISTRY TURNS
REFERENCES
 James l Guttman. Problem solving in endodontics-
prevention ,identification and management, 3rd
edition
 Anderson JO, Anderson FM. Textbook and colour
atlas of trumatic injuries to the teeth ,ed-3
Copenheagen 1994
 Guttmann JL ,Evertt Guttman MS. Cause, incidence
and prevention of trauma to teeth, Dent Clin North
Am.
39;1-14 .1995
 Roh BD, Lee ye. Analysis of 154 cases with cracks;
Dent. Traumatology. 2006
 Oliet S. Treating vertical fractures. J. Endont. 1994
MY SINCERE THANKS
Dr. A. NANDHINI, MDS
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry &
Endodontics
Tooth fractures

Tooth fractures

  • 1.
    TOOTH CRAFT – SKILLUNVEILED Dr.Hyun Joong, BDS, CHENNAI.
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION  Fractures tothe anterior teeth-trauma  Minor to severe -vertical, diagonal or horizontal fractures.  Dental emergency  Skill - career of every practitioner.
  • 3.
    AIM  Uncomplicated crownfractures  Complicated crown fractures  Crown root fractures  Prevent tooth loss  Improve cosmetic results  Decrease risk of infection
  • 4.
  • 5.
    COMPLAINTS • 19 yrold male • Broken upper front teeth HISTORY • Recent trauma to upper front teeth CLINICAL EXAMINATION • Fracture involving enamel in 11,21 DIAGNOSIS
  • 6.
    TREATMENT  Enamel reshaping (ENAMELOPLASTY) Thintapering diamond Finishing and polishing
  • 7.
    Pre & Posttreatment photographs
  • 8.
    CASE REPORT 2 REATTACHMENTOF FRACTURED FRAGMENT
  • 9.
    COMPLAINTS • 25 yrold male patient broken upper front teeth • Brought the fractured fragment HISTORY • Trauma to upper front teeth on same day. CLINICAL EXAMINATION • Fracture involving enamel and dentin 11 DIAGNOSIS • Ellis Class II fracture 11
  • 10.
    TREATMENT PLAN  Reattachfractured fragment. PROCEDURE  Tooth preparation done  Fractured fragment was re-united using Light Cure Composite Resin.
  • 11.
    Pre & Postoperative photographs
  • 12.
    CASE REPORT -3 LAMINATE RESTORATION
  • 13.
    COMPLAINT  18 yrold male patient  Broken upper front teeth and sensitivity HISTORY  Trauma to upper front tooth a month back. CLINICAL EXAMINATION  Fracture involving enamel in 11  Fracture involving enamel, dentin in 21  Vitality test-normal 11,21 DIAGNOSIS  Ellis Class I Fracture 11  Ellis Class II Fracture 21
  • 14.
     Enameloplasty –11  Laminate restoration with Glass Ionomer Cement and Light Cure Composite Resin - 21 TREATMENT PLAN
  • 15.
    Pre & Postoperative photographs
  • 16.
    CASE REPORT –4 MANAGEMENT OF VERTICAL FRACTURE
  • 17.
    COMPLAINTS  28 yrold female  Broken upper front teeth with pain HISTORY  Injury on same day due to fall CLINICAL EXAMINATION  Vertical fracture Involving enamel, dentin and pulp in 22 and evidence of associated oblique fracture involving pulp extending subgingivally DIAGNOSIS –  Comminuted vertical & oblique
  • 18.
    TREATMENT PLAN STEP 1 Orthodonticbanding STEP 2 Access opened with the band in place and obturated using warm sectional condensation method
  • 19.
    STEP 3 Band removed& Fracture line reinforced with dual cure composite
  • 20.
    STEP 5 Tooth reductiondone STEP 7 Jacket crown luted in 22
  • 21.
    Pre & PostOp Photographs
  • 22.
  • 23.
    COMPLAINTS  35 yrold male  Broken upper front teeth with pain HISTORY  Trauma due to RTA on same day. CLINICAL EXAMINATION  Fracture involving enamel, dentin & pulp in 11  Oblique crown root fracture in 12,13 with fracture line extending subgingivally below the alveolar crest. DIAGNOSIS  Ellis Class III fracture 11  Ellis class VI fracture 12,13
  • 24.
    TREATMENT PLAN STEP 2 Rootcanal treatment done in 11,12 and 13 STEP 1 Fractured crown extracted
  • 25.
    STEP- 3 Flap raisedsurgically STEP – 5 Surgical re-attachment of fractured fragment done with GIC STEP - 4 Pre fabricated metal post tried in and luted
  • 26.
    STEP - 6 Flapre-positioned and sutured STEP – 7 Post operative X-ray
  • 27.
  • 28.
    DISCUSSION  Fractures involvingenamel - Enameloplasty  Fractured fragment available –re-attachment - quick esthetic rehabilitation  Crown fractures that involve only enamel or both enamel and dentin should be tested for vitality, before protecting the exposed dentin with composite  If reversible pulpitis is diagnosed, the pulp should be protected from further insult by providing a restoration that reduces microleakage and prevents fracture from propogating
  • 29.
    DISCUSSION  Modern dentinbonding materials serve as an interim restoration providing occlusal protection if prognosis is gaurded  Examination of the fractured fragment allows accurate assessment of the restorability of teeth  In cases the tooth is fractured but the fracture is still incomplete, crown should be supported with metal band, before RCT is commenced Cont.
  • 30.
    Cont.  Fractures involvinggingival crevice & attachment may necessitate RCT to stop bacterial contamination that is likely to occur along the fracture line o Longevity unknown – extraction following treatment is a possibility o Less esthetic –fragment dehydrated o Need of continuous monitoring SHORTCOMINGS OF RE-ATTACHMENT PROCEDURES
  • 31.
    ADVANTAGES  Rapid  Conservative Colour match  Economical  Positive emotional social response from patient
  • 32.
    CONCLUSION A DENTIST MAYONLY BE SOMEONE IN THE WORLD, UNTIL WE PROCEED AS THOUGH OUR LIMITS OF ABILITIES DO NOT EXIST, WHEN WE RAISE OUR SIGHT AND SEE OUR POSSIBILITIES, FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS LOST HIS SMILE, WE MIGHT BE HIS LUMINOUS SUNSHINE, IT’S THE POINT WHERE DENTISTRY TURNS
  • 33.
    REFERENCES  James lGuttman. Problem solving in endodontics- prevention ,identification and management, 3rd edition  Anderson JO, Anderson FM. Textbook and colour atlas of trumatic injuries to the teeth ,ed-3 Copenheagen 1994  Guttmann JL ,Evertt Guttman MS. Cause, incidence and prevention of trauma to teeth, Dent Clin North Am. 39;1-14 .1995  Roh BD, Lee ye. Analysis of 154 cases with cracks; Dent. Traumatology. 2006  Oliet S. Treating vertical fractures. J. Endont. 1994
  • 34.
    MY SINCERE THANKS Dr.A. NANDHINI, MDS Assistant Professor Dept. of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics