TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
STARSurg ASME Conference Presentation
1. Student Audit and Research in Surgery
www.STARSurg.org
STARSurgUK: A novel tool for improving
medical student perceptions of surgical
academia through participation in a
collaborative, multi-centre, national cohort
study
3. Paper background
• Tomorrows Doctors
• Barriers
• STARSurg
• This parallel study aimed to evaluate the
educational impact of participation
www.STARSurg.org
4. www.STARSurg.org
STARSurg 2013
•“Investigating the safety profile of post-
operative NSAIDS following bowel
resection”
•273 student collaborators
•32/33 medical schools represented
•Data delivered from 109 hospitals
5. Cohort
• Gender
• Age
• Medical school year
• Previous degree
• Previous collaborative research
• Current career aspirations
• Previous academic output
www.STARSurg.org
7. Method (II) - Questionnaire
www.STARSurg.org
•The primary outcome
measure was relative
change in self perceived
confidence in key
academic domains
following involvement in
STARsurg
•97 paired pre-post
responses (36%) were
received
8. Results (I) – Sample size and
confidence
• Post hoc two-tail test
• 97 paired responses
• 6.6% margin of error at a 90% confidence
interval
www.STARSurg.org
9. Results (II) – Participation in
training
• YouTube
• Twitter
• Meeting
www.STARSurg.org
10. Results (III) - Confidence in Core
Academic Competences
• increased confidence in:
– Appropriate data collection in a clinical setting
(p<0.001)
– Presentation of scientific results (p<0.013)
– Communication with local research governance
bodies (p<0.001)
– Approaching clinical staff for local collaboration
(p<0.001)
www.STARSurg.org
11. Results (IV) - Attitudes to research
and audit
www.STARSurg.org
•Collaborators described an increased appreciation of
research, audit and study design (p=0.001)
•Collaborative networks
•Collaborators’ perceptions of academic careers
remained unchanged (p=0.116)
12. Conclusions
• This collaborative study empowered students to
engage in surgical academia
• Collaborators reported increased appreciation and
confidence in relation to essential generic academic
principles and skills
• Encouraging active participation in collaborative,
student-led studies offers a novel approach for
delivering essential academic training
• The educational benefit warrants further attention
www.STARSurg.org
A total of 86 (88.7%) collaborators participated in at least one
optional training initiative. Respondents engaged most frequently with the YouTube debrief videos (n=80, 82.5%); fewer attended the National Collaborators’ Meeting (n=32, 33.0%) or participated in the live Twitter® forum (n=26, 26.8%).
Participation led to increased confidence in key generic academic activities
The majority of collaborators (98%) disclosed no previous interaction with trainee-led research collaborative networks but 95% were likely to engage further following participation in STARSurgUK
Increased appreciation of research, audit and study design.
Refer back to STARsurg aims – improve research collab opinions & to build a network of student surgical enthusiasts
The majority of collaborators (61/97, 62.9%) disagreed or strongly disagreed that collaborative research opportunities between medical schools were easily accessible. The majority (67/97, 69.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that engagement with the STARSurg collaborative network had made it easier to participate in such activities.
The number of collaborators calling for greater inter-school, surgically-themed networking opportunities was high before (n=79/97, 81.4%) and after (n=83/97, 85.6%) the study.
Future work: look at the role of integrating other promotional initiatives into medical school curricula, in addition to existing, medical school-specfic provisions to encourage academic engagement.
Longitudinal studies may wish to explore the impact of standardized initiatives on future participation in research and uptake of academic careers