Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher born in 1588 who is considered one of the founders of modern political philosophy. He studied at Oxford University and traveled throughout Europe, becoming interested in different forms of government. His most famous work was Leviathan, in which he argued that human nature is selfish and violent, and that life in a state of nature would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short." Hobbes believed people consent to a social contract establishing an absolute sovereign, such as a monarch, to maintain order and security. He viewed sovereignty as the foundation of civil government and advocated for strong, centralized states with absolute power.
Very helpful for UG/PG students about John Locke
General Introduction; Natural Law and Natural rights; Views on Human Nature; Views on State of Nature; Views on Law of Nature; Views on Social Contract; Features of Social Contract; Views on State
Very helpful for UG/PG students about J J Rousseau
Life History; An overview of Work; Views on Human Nature; Views on State of Nature; Views on Social Contract; Views on General Will; Characteristics of General Will; Popular Sovereignty
Very helpful for UG/PG students about John Locke
General Introduction; Natural Law and Natural rights; Views on Human Nature; Views on State of Nature; Views on Law of Nature; Views on Social Contract; Features of Social Contract; Views on State
Very helpful for UG/PG students about J J Rousseau
Life History; An overview of Work; Views on Human Nature; Views on State of Nature; Views on Social Contract; Views on General Will; Characteristics of General Will; Popular Sovereignty
5th April 1588 , born in Wiltshire England .Thomas Hobbes was excellent in classical languages.Hobbes's Contribution,Hobbes political philosophy: A summary ,Social Contract Theory: ,Absolute Monarch: , Hobbes concept of war and peace.Relevance of Hobbes’s philosophy in present age:.
Hobbes argued that all humans are by nature equal in faculties of body and mind (i.e., no natural inequalities are so great as to give anyone a "claim" to an exclusive "benefit"). From this equality and other causes in human nature, everyone is naturally willing to fight one another: so that "during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called warre; and such a warre as is of every man against every man". In this state every person has a natural right or liberty to do anything one thinks necessary for preserving one's own life; and life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short"
5th April 1588 , born in Wiltshire England .Thomas Hobbes was excellent in classical languages.Hobbes's Contribution,Hobbes political philosophy: A summary ,Social Contract Theory: ,Absolute Monarch: , Hobbes concept of war and peace.Relevance of Hobbes’s philosophy in present age:.
Hobbes argued that all humans are by nature equal in faculties of body and mind (i.e., no natural inequalities are so great as to give anyone a "claim" to an exclusive "benefit"). From this equality and other causes in human nature, everyone is naturally willing to fight one another: so that "during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called warre; and such a warre as is of every man against every man". In this state every person has a natural right or liberty to do anything one thinks necessary for preserving one's own life; and life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short"
Option B Obedience to Authority Cause and Effect. First, read St.docxgerardkortney
Option B: Obedience to Authority: Cause and Effect. First, read Stanley Milgram’s classic article on his infamous ‘shock’ experiments in the 1960’s. Follow this up by watching Obeying or Resisting Authority: A Psychological Retrospective, available via the Films on Demand section of the Ashford University Library. Read Chapter 7: Power and Politics. Then, address each of the following questions.
· What specific factors would cause people to continue to shock other people, past the perceived thresholds of extreme pain, unconsciousness, or even death?
· Provide three different explanations for this behavior, utilizing the three perspectives we have learned so far: the anthropological, political, and sociological perspectives.
· In other words, to what specific causal factor would an anthropologist attribute this behavior? What about a political scientist? A sociologist?
Be sure to provide concrete examples from the text and from your own research. In crafting your response, you must make reference to at least two sources beyond the textbook or the assigned documentary
Below are links that will help compete assignment along with chapter 7
http://www.apa.org/research/action/order.aspx
https://simplypsychology.org/milgram.html
https://youtu.be/fxiWkTCjMmY
CHAPTER 7: Power and Politics
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, students will be able to:
Describe the discipline of political science and explain what it is concerned with.
Define democracy.
Describe the kind of democracy that exists in the United States.
List the branches of the U.S. government.
Explain the source of each branch’s power and how that power is exercised.
Politics, Political Science, and Government Power
A distinguished American political scientist, Harold Lasswell, defined politics as “who gets what, when, and how.” “The study of politics,” he said, “is the study of influence and the influential. The influential are those who get the most of what there is to get. . . . Those who get the most are the elite; the rest are mass.”1 He went on to define political science as the study of “the shaping and sharing of power.” Admittedly, Lasswell’s definition of political science is very broad. Indeed, if we accept Lasswell’s definition of political science as the study of power, then political science includes cultural, economic, social, and personal power relationships—topics that we have already discussed in chapters on anthropology, economics, sociology, and psychology.
politics
the study of power
Although some political scientists have accepted Lasswell’s challenge to study power in all its forms in society, most limit the definition of political science to the study of government and how individuals influence government action. This chapter focuses primarily on the study of government and how individuals influence government action in the United States.
political science
the study of government and how individuals influence government action
What distinguis.
According to the Oxford Dictionary of Sociology (1994), ‘The state is a distinct set of institutions that has the authority to make rules which govern society.’ These institutions, according to Miliband (1969), are the government, the administration (the civil service), the judiciary and parliamentary assemblies. State power lies in these institutions.
Max Weber defined it as ‘the social insti¬tution that holds a monopoly over the use of force’. It has a ‘monopoly’ of legitimate violence ‘within a specific territory”. Hence, the state includes such institutions as the armed forces, civil service or bureaucracy, police, judiciary and local and national councils of elected representatives, such as parliament.
Consequently, the state is not a unified entity. It is rather a set of institutions which describe the terrain and parameters for political conflicts between various interests over the use of resources and the direction of public policy.
Sociologists have been particularly concerned with the state, but they have examined it in relation to society as a whole, rather than in isolation. Their main concern is the description analysis, and explanation of the state as an institution which claims a monopoly of the legitimate use of force within a given territory.
What are the state’s interests or the boundaries of the state? It is very difficult to identify them clearly, since different parts of the state apparatus can have different interests and conflicting preferences. Because of this diffi¬culty, there are frequently conflicts between elected politicians and non-elected civil servants or the judiciary over policy and resources.
Moreover, its boundaries have not been clearly defined and are constantly changing. It is here useful to bear in mind Althusser’s concept of state apparatuses. The capacity of the state to control the armed forces and police (repressive state apparatus) as well as the major means of communication, notably the media (the ideological state apparatus) is crucial to its power.
Defining state, Anthony Giddens (1997) writes: ‘A state exists where there is a political apparatus of government (institutions like a parliament, civil services officials, etc.) ruling over a given territory, whose authority is backed by a legal system and by the capacity to use military force to implement its policies.’
Dunleavy and O’Leary (1967) have suggested the following five characteristics of the modern state:
1. The state is a recognizably separate institution or set of institutions, so differentiated from the rest of its society as to create identifiable public and private spheres.
2. The State is sovereign, or the supreme power, within its territory, and by definition the ultimate authority for all law.
3. The state’s sovereignty extends to all the individuals within a given territory, irrespective of formal positions held in the government or rule-making institutions.
4. The modern state’s personnel are mostly recruited and trained for manag
THIS IS THE SECOND SECTION OF BUILDING BLOCK OF SOCIAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH WHERE THE CONCEPTS & VARIABLES ARE DISCUSSED IN EXPLANATORY FORM. HOPE THIS IS USEFUL & SUGGESTION IS INVITED.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
2. INTRODUCTION
The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) is best known
for his political thought, and deservedly so. His vision of the world is
strikingly original and still relevant to contemporary politics.
Born in London in 1588.
He received his college education at Oxford University in England,
where he studied classics.
One of the founders of modern political philosophy.
Traveled to other European countries several times to meet with
scientists and to study different forms of government.
During his time outside of England, Hobbes became interested in why
people allowed themselves to be ruled and what would be the best
form of government for England.
3. WORKS
De Corpore
De Cive
Leviathan:
Of man,
Of commonwealth,
Of a Christian commonwealth, and
Of the Kingdom of Darkness.
4. INTELLECTUAL INFLENCES
Reaction against religious authority
Deep admiration for (and involvement in)
the emerging scientific method
5. METHODOLOGY
PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD: RESOLUTION AND
COMPOSITION: Stresses the importance of having a
proper philosophical method for attaining knowledge; For
Hobbes, such a method was not only important for
attaining knowledge, but also served the practical end of
avoiding disputes which arose from speculation and
subjective interpretation.
SCIENTIFIC MATERIALISM: existence of matter &
motion.
6. HUMAN NATURE
Selfish creature
Violent nature
Fear
Evil aspect
Unsocial animal
Feeling of self protection
Egoism
Quarrelsome
Reason is artificial
8. LIFE IN STATE OF NATURE IS ‘SOLITARY, POOR, NASTY,
BRUTISH & SHORT
No distinction between right & wrong
Existence of violence
Irrational life
Absence of private property
Individual has all the rights over all the things
Natural rights & laws
Absolute liberty
Insecurity of life
9. CRITICISM
No historical proof
Wrong notion isolated individual
One side view about human
State of nature is not a state of absolute
liberty & equality
10. LAWS OF NATURE
Men should seek & observe peace
Men should surrender their equal right to
possess all things
Men should abide by the terms & conditions of
the contract
Sense of gratitude
Complasance
Pardon the offences
To carry out covenants & promises
Surrender of natural rights
Joint property
12. Iauthorize&giveupmyrightofgoverningmyselftothisman,ortothisassemblyofmenon
thisconditionthatthougiveupthyrighttohim,&authorizeallhisactionsinlikemanner.
Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the
view that persons' moral and/or political obligations are
dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form
the society in which they live.
The enlightenment saw the development of social contract
theory of which Hobbes and Locke were the principal
exponents. The theory of social contract is essentially a morally
justified agreement made amongst individuals through which
an organized society is brought into existence .
Ideas on Social Contract Theory can be found in his text
entitled Leviathan published in 1651
One way to arrive at a moral social-contract, a solution to the
problem of self-interest.
13. MEANING
The voluntary agreement among individuals by
which, according to any of various theories, as of
Hobbes, Locke, or Rousseau, organized society is
brought into being and invested with the right to
secure mutual protection and welfare or to
regulate the relations among its members.
Social contract theory, nearly as old
as philosophy itself, is the view that persons'
moral and/or political obligations are dependent
upon a contract or agreement among them to form
the society in which they live.
14. FEATURES
It is a contract between individuals
Creation of a sovereign authority
The sovereign is not a party to the contract
Contract is perpetual & irrevocable
Minority is subjected to the dictates of
majority
The objective of the contract is protection of
human life
Monarchy is the best government.
15. CRITICISM
It is a bond of slavery.
Individuals lose rights against the ruler.
Contradiction in Hobbes theory.
It puts cart before the horse.
Not a convincing theory.
It is a theory of fear.
Personal motive.
16. THEORY OF ORIGIN OF STATE
Leviathan delineates very precisely and
straightforwardly the creation of the state by
an agreement.
To begin with, before the state was created,
there was a state of nature in which a war was
raging.
17. BEFORE DISCUSSING THE ORIGIN
HOBBES DESCRIBED:-
Views on Human Nature
State of Nature
Social Contract
18. FEATURES
State originates because of contract
Contract- Result of Prudence
Unilingual Contract
Powers of sovereign are unlimited
Minority has no right to revolt against
Majority
Contract is Perpetual
Law is the command of sovereign
Advocacy of monarchy
19. CRITICISM
Human nature described wrong
Man is not unsocial
Illogical
Rights can be enjoyed only in a state
Advocacy of absolute monarchy is wrong
Contract can be unilateral
Views regarding the surrender of rights are
without basis
20. VIEWS ON INDIVIDUALISM
State is the means & Individuals are the end
Right to resist
Protection of life of individual is the obligation of
sovereign
Contract do not destroy individual existence
Supremacy of individual over individual not
acceptable
Liberties of individual
Non-interference in economic spheres
Supporter of individual rights
21. CRITICISM
Rights & liberties fades in front of the
sovereign
Presented the negative human nature
No limits for the sovereign
22. THEORY OF SOVEREIGNTY
sovereignty is a general natural law that
human beings get to know of through the
exercise of reason.
23. HOBBES FORMS OF GOVERNMENT:
Hobbes in actual talked about three forms of government
totally different from each other. Monarchy, Aristocracy
and democracy are his main concern in specifically talking
about the forms of government. He classified and explained
the concept of three forms of government in a way that
when all the powers are vested in a man by the state he is
said to be monarchic but at the same time when the powers
are vested in assembly it is said to be democratic form of
government at that point of time.And if specifically talks
about power given to few persons it would be called as
Aristocratic form of government. He specifically talked
about three forms of government and added no space for
any further form of government; that he doesn’t believe in
mixed form of government.
24. MONARCHY:
The preference he gave more was on the Monarchic government calling
it as a best form of government. Apart from Monarchy, He rather
believed in that particular form of government which could bring up the
peace and security in the country. In his explanation of the forms of
government he rather was much against the division of the powers. He
believed the only division of the power between the Kings, Lords, and
commons was responsible who could bring civil war and yet a source of
destruction it was.
According to him, Monarchy guarantees stability and uniformity which
actually helps in preventing from falling into any chaotic situation in any
type of country having this particular form of government. Whereas, he
supported Monarchy with a fact that in a monarchic form of government
the competition for the seat, offices and posts is less as compared to
aristocracy and that of democracy.The major advantage he came up
with was that the monarchs of any country have the same interests as
that of the people.
25. CONCLUSION
Gauthier, Kleinerman, andVan Mill have
given the most famous critiques about
Hobbes’ political philosophy. • Logic versus
Irrationality • Curbing civil liberties •
Pessimistic ideas • Anti Democratic •
Conception of limited resources • Rejecting
basic individual right • Universalization of the
appetites and aversions • Contradiction •
Reality of a Leviathan