This document provides an overview of Thomas Hobbes' political philosophy as outlined in his work Leviathan. It discusses Hobbes' social contract theory and the emergence of the sovereign authority. Hobbes argues humans surrender their freedoms and form a commonwealth, with the sovereign given absolute power to maintain peace and order. The document also summarizes Hobbes' views on human nature, the different forms of government, and criticisms of his philosophy.
Very helpful for UG/PG students about John Locke
General Introduction; Natural Law and Natural rights; Views on Human Nature; Views on State of Nature; Views on Law of Nature; Views on Social Contract; Features of Social Contract; Views on State
Hobbes argued that all humans are by nature equal in faculties of body and mind (i.e., no natural inequalities are so great as to give anyone a "claim" to an exclusive "benefit"). From this equality and other causes in human nature, everyone is naturally willing to fight one another: so that "during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called warre; and such a warre as is of every man against every man". In this state every person has a natural right or liberty to do anything one thinks necessary for preserving one's own life; and life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short"
Very helpful for UG/PG students about John Locke
General Introduction; Natural Law and Natural rights; Views on Human Nature; Views on State of Nature; Views on Law of Nature; Views on Social Contract; Features of Social Contract; Views on State
Hobbes argued that all humans are by nature equal in faculties of body and mind (i.e., no natural inequalities are so great as to give anyone a "claim" to an exclusive "benefit"). From this equality and other causes in human nature, everyone is naturally willing to fight one another: so that "during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called warre; and such a warre as is of every man against every man". In this state every person has a natural right or liberty to do anything one thinks necessary for preserving one's own life; and life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short"
5th April 1588 , born in Wiltshire England .Thomas Hobbes was excellent in classical languages.Hobbes's Contribution,Hobbes political philosophy: A summary ,Social Contract Theory: ,Absolute Monarch: , Hobbes concept of war and peace.Relevance of Hobbes’s philosophy in present age:.
5th April 1588 , born in Wiltshire England .Thomas Hobbes was excellent in classical languages.Hobbes's Contribution,Hobbes political philosophy: A summary ,Social Contract Theory: ,Absolute Monarch: , Hobbes concept of war and peace.Relevance of Hobbes’s philosophy in present age:.
Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈
✅ Quality
You get an original and high-quality paper based on extensive research. The completed work will be correctly formatted, referenced and tailored to your level of study.
✅ Confidentiality
We value your privacy. We do not disclose your personal information to any third party without your consent. Your payment data is also safely handled as you process the payment through a secured and verified payment processor.
✅ Originality
Every single order we deliver is written from scratch according to your instructions. We have zero tolerance for plagiarism, so all completed papers are unique and checked for plagiarism using a leading plagiarism detector.
✅ On-time delivery
We strive to deliver quality custom written papers before the deadline. That's why you don't have to worry about missing the deadline for submitting your assignment.
✅ Free revisions
You can ask to revise your paper as many times as you need until you're completely satisfied with the result. Provide notes about what needs to be changed, and we'll change it right away.
✅ 24/7 Support
From answering simple questions to solving any possible issues, we're always here to help you in chat and on the phone. We've got you covered at any time, day or night.
Thomas Hobbes Leviathan Essay
A state of nature is a hypothetical state of being within a society that defines such a way that particular community behaves within itself. English philosopher Thomas Hobbes proclaimed that, A state of nature is a state of war. By this, Hobbes means that every human being, given the absence of government or a contract between other members of a society, would act in a war like state in which each man would be motivated by desires derived solely with the intention of maximizing his own utility.
He claims that acts of kindness, charity and benevolence are always actions that the performer believes will result in a beneficial consequence for himself. Hobbes basis for this argument lies in the concept of...show more content...The most highly organized social network is called a commonwealth, a web of contracts between members of a community, which according to Hobbes is synonymous to the formation of an entirely new person of which each individual is but a working part (Leviathan 2, 17). Hence the title of Hobbes most famous work, Leviathan, which is a sea monster that lives off of the sea of individuals. And who is to rule this commonwealth?
Hobbes answers that there needs to be a sovereign, to judge and enforce the laws of the contracts (Leviathan 2, 18). This sovereign, who is either chosen by the creators of the covenant (institution) or who forces people under his rule (acquisition) has the final rule in enforcing the laws.
Essentially what Hobbes is saying by all of this is that human beings are not fit to govern themselves. The notion of the social contract serves the purpose of saving us from ourselves because, according to Hobbes, h
Week 1, Lecture B Do We Need A GovernmentOften we use words .docxcelenarouzie
Week 1, Lecture B: "Do We Need A Government?"
Often we use words like freedom and liberty without ever thinking about what these words mean. We assume that we all mean the same thing by these words; however, in reality, we all live by different personal definitions of freedom and liberty. Our definitions are not based on a dictionary but are informed by our unique personal life experiences. Consider the diversity even in this course. How might someone understand words like liberty and freedom from a background, culture, age, gender, or even race that is different from yours? Each of us has a unique story that has brought us to this point – and each of our stories is intrinsically valuable and important.
If we think about this level of diversity – how and why do such different individuals come together to exist together in a society?
The State of Nature, or Life Without Government
Simply, freedom and liberty are not the same thing. Let’s consider what we mean by freedom. For our purposes, freedom is doing whatever you want to do, whenever you want to do it.
If everyone had absolute freedom and could do whatever they wanted whenever they wanted what would our world look like? What would our relationships with each other look like?
These are the questions that political philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke asked. These are also question that our founders asked as they pondered the creation of a new nation. They called this condition of absolute freedom the State of Nature – a state in which people lived in absolute freedom with no social structures or government.
For Hobbes, life in this state of nature looked very terrible. Hobbes described the state of nature as:
“In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short…”
Additionally, Hobbes suggested:
“For before constitution of sovereign power, as hath already been shown, all men had right to all things, which necessarily causeth war.”
For Hobbes, freedom was each individual having the right to all things. If you have new car, in the state of nature, I have right to take your new car – even by force and violence.
Hobbes is saying that in the state of nature, or trying to live life without government, no form of cooperation between individuals is possible and thus there will be no grocery stores, no computers, no smartphones, no art, and each individual will suffer a very quick and violent death.
The founders of our nation shared Hobbes’ fairly pessimistic outlook regarding human nature. James Madison famously wrote i.
RESPOND to each post150 words EACHPOST ONEAs a result of havin.docxisbelsejx0m
RESPOND to each post150 words EACH
POST ONE
As a result of having a different perspective than Thomas Hobbes and the state of nature, John Locke also views the need for enacting a social contract differently. Locke did not see humans as warring in a state of nature as Hobbes had. Instead, Locke's state of nature could be explained as a perfect place where people had the freedom to choose their own paths in life so long as it did not infringe upon others.
Locke viewed people as being kind toward one another as a result of the Law of Nature, which was a result of virtues from God. Under the Law of Nature, people were equal and would be treated as such because of their morals stemming from their belief in God. By the same token, Locke acknowledged that having liberty in the state of nature was not synonymous with a "license" to do what we pleased, as, "no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions…"(Locke, section 6). Only when a man has done something wrong can another man have power over him in the state of nature and this power cannot be used excessively, and only using calm reason and conscience (Locke, section 8)
Locke also understood the need for private property for men. Private property was the combining of a person using his (her) own labor along with the natural resources in nature to produce something. When a person used their abilities to produce something, they should have the right to that final product. However, a person could not claim more than what should be considered their own "fair share." In other words, owning excessive private property would now breach the Law of Nature. Because of the desire for private property and the want to maintain it, men would give up the freedom of the state of nature, relying upon a government for protection.
To me, Locke's state of nature is more in line with my own thinking. People are not naturally evil and warring, but instead more virtuous, whether stemming from beliefs in God, their own upbringing, or just naturally moral. As a result, the only need for people to enter into a social contract is to settle disputes and not for self preservation as Hobbes suggested.
Although I accept (interpret?) the notions of a state of nature from both Locke and Hobbes as theoretical, Locke's description seems closer to what I understand as reality. His description of the importance of property is not only unique from Hobbes', but also makes sense. People "like their things" and do not want them taken away. This seems very natural in society today. Locke's views were instrumental not only in our "re-establishment" of the state of nature when the American colonists declared their independence, but was also instrumental in the writing of the Bill of Rights.
POST TWO
Locke view of the state of nature is that mankind is "a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one's life as one best sees fit, free from the interference of others (iep.utm.edu)." In other words people ar.
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...Kitchen on Fire
Discover how Oakland's innovative corporate wellness initiatives are transforming workplace culture, nurturing the well-being of employees, and fostering a thriving environment. From comprehensive mental health support to flexible work arrangements and holistic wellness workshops, these programs are empowering individuals to navigate stress effectively, leading to increased productivity, satisfaction, and overall success.
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdfsundazesurf80
SunDaze Surf offers top swimwear tips: choose high-quality, UV-protective fabrics to shield your skin. Opt for secure fits that withstand waves and active movement. Bright colors enhance visibility, while adjustable straps ensure comfort. Prioritize styles with good support, like racerbacks or underwire tops, for active beach days. Always rinse swimwear after use to maintain fabric integrity.
MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANEDK PAGEANT
Amruthaa Uttam Jagdhane, a stunning woman from Pune, has won the esteemed title of Mrs. India 2024, which is given out by the Dk Exhibition. Her journey to this prestigious accomplishment is a confirmation of her faithful assurance, extraordinary gifts, and profound commitment to enabling women.
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les FrançaisIpsos France
Ipsos, l’une des principales sociétés mondiales d’études de marché dévoile les résultats de son étude Ipsos Global Advisor “Pride 2024”. De ses débuts aux Etats-Unis et désormais dans de très nombreux pays, le mois de juin est traditionnellement consacré aux « Marches des Fiertés » et à des événements festifs autour du concept de Pride. A cette occasion, Ipsos a réalisé une enquête dans vingt-six pays dressant plusieurs constats. Les clivages des opinions entre générations s’accentuent tandis que le soutien à des mesures sociétales et d’inclusion en faveur des LGBT+ notamment transgenres continue de s’effriter.
Is your favorite ring slipping and sliding on your finger? You're not alone. Must Read this Guide on What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big as shared by the experts of Andrews Jewelers.
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Yearsgreendigital
Johnny Depp, synonymous with eclectic roles and unparalleled acting prowess. has also been a significant figure in fashion and style. Johnny Depp long hair is a distinctive trademark among the various elements that define his unique persona. This article delves into the evolution, impact. and cultural significance of Johnny Depp long hair. exploring how it has contributed to his iconic status.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Johnny Depp is an actor known for his chameleon-like ability to transform into a wide range of characters. from the eccentric Captain Jack Sparrow in "Pirates of the Caribbean" to the introspective Edward Scissorhands. His long hair is one constant throughout his evolving roles and public appearances. Johnny Depp long hair is not a style choice but a significant aspect of his identity. contributing to his allure and mystique. This article explores the journey and significance of Johnny Depp long hair. highlighting how it has become integral to his brand.
The Early Years: A Budding Star with Signature Locks
1980s: The Rise of a Young Heartthrob
Johnny Depp's journey in Hollywood began in the 1980s. with his breakout role in the television series "21 Jump Street." During this time, his hair was short, but it was already clear that Depp had a penchant for unique and edgy styles. By the decade's end, Depp started experimenting with longer hair. setting the stage for a lifelong signature.
1990s: From Heartthrob to Icon
The 1990s were transformative for Johnny Depp his career and personal style. Films like "Edward Scissorhands" (1990) and "Benny & Joon" (1993) saw Depp sporting various hair lengths and styles. But, his long, unkempt hair in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" (1993) began to draw significant attention. This period marked the beginning of Johnny Depp long hair. which became a defining feature of his image.
The Iconic Roles: Hair as a Character Element
Edward Scissorhands (1990)
In "Edward Scissorhands," Johnny Depp's character had a wild and mane that complemented his ethereal and misunderstood persona. This role showcased how long hair Johnny Depp could enhance a character's depth and mystery.
Captain Jack Sparrow: The Pirate with Flowing Locks
One of Johnny Depp's iconic roles is Captain Jack Sparrow from the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series. Sparrow's long, dreadlocked hair symbolised his rebellious and unpredictable nature. The character's look, complete with beads and trinkets woven into his hair. was a collaboration between Depp and the film's costume designers. This style became iconic and influenced fashion trends and Halloween costumes worldwide.
Other Memorable Characters
Depp's long hair has also been featured in other roles, such as Ichabod Crane in "Sleepy Hollow" (1999). and Roux in "Chocolat" (2000). In these films, his hair added a layer of authenticity and depth to his characters. proving that Johnny Depp with long hair is more than a style—it's a storytelling tool.
Off-Screen Influenc
Have you ever wondered about the lost city of Atlantis and its profound connection to our modern world? Ruth Elisabeth Hancock’s podcast, “Visions of Atlantis,” delves deep into this intriguing topic in a captivating conversation with Michael Le Flem, author of the enlightening book titled “Visions of Atlantis.” This podcast episode offers a thought-provoking blend of historical inquiry, esoteric wisdom, and contemporary reflections. Let’s embark on a journey of discovery as we unpack the mysteries of ancient civilizations and their relevance to our present existence.
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS:
• Social Contract of Hobbes
• Hobbes’ forms of Government
• Monarchy
• Leviathan
Book 1
Law of Nature
Commonwealth
Book 2
• Hobbes’ individualism
• Hobbes’ human nature
• Consequences of Social Contract
• Criticism
3. SOCIAL CONTRACT OF HOBBES:
Hobbes’ Theory of Social Contract first time appeared in Leviathan in
1651 during the civil war in Britain. According to Hobbes, prior to social
contract man lives in state of nature; chaotic conditions of constant fear.
Man has natural desire for security and order. For this, they surrender
their freedom and rights to some authority by a contract who must
command obedience.
This lead to emergence of monarchy as mightiest authority to protect
and preserve their lives and property. Moral obligations are placed on
sovereign and he will be bound by natural law. Hobbes is a supporter of
absolutism. He upheld the principle of might is right.
“Law is dependent upon the sanction of the sovereign and the
Government without sword are but words and of no strength to secure a
man at all”
- Hobbes
4. Hobbes says humans are necessarily and exclusively self-interested.
All men pursue only what they perceive to be in their own
individually considered best interests. Men are drawn to that
which they desire and repelled by that to which they are
averse. They are reasonable and can pursue their desire
efficiently.
They ought to be willing to submit themselves to political
authority.
5. Hobbes impels subjects to surrender all their rights and vest all
liberties in the sovereign for preservation of peace, life and
prosperity of the subjects.
It is in this way the natural law became a moral guide or
directive to the sovereign for preservation of the natural rights of
the subjects.
All real law is civil law, the laws commanded and enforced by
the sovereign and are brought into the world for nothing else but
to limit the natural liberty of particular men, in such a manner, as
they might not hurt but to assist one another and join against a
common enemy.
Hence, Individualism, materialism, utilitarianism and
absolutions are inter-woven in the theory of Hobbes.
6. HOBBES FORMS OF GOVERNMENT:
Hobbes in actual talked about three forms of government totally
different from each other. Monarchy, Aristocracy and democracy
are his main concern in specifically talking about the forms of
government.
He classified and explained the concept of three forms of
government in a way that when all the powers are vested in a man
by the state he is said to be monarchic but at the same time when
the powers are vested in assembly it is said to be democratic form
of government at that point of time. And if specifically talks about
power given to few persons it would be called as Aristocratic form
of government.
He specifically talked about three forms of government and added
no space for any further form of government; that he doesn’t
believe in mixed form of government.
7. MONARCHY:
The preference he gave more was on the Monarchic
government calling it as a best form of government.
Apart from Monarchy, He rather believed in that particular
form of government which could bring up the peace and
security in the country. In his explanation of the forms of
government he rather was much against the division of the
powers.
He believed the only division of the power between the Kings,
Lords, and commons was responsible who could bring civil war
and yet a source of destruction it was.
8. According to him, Monarchy guarantees stability and
uniformity which actually helps in preventing from falling into
any chaotic situation in any type of country having this
particular form of government.
Whereas, he supported Monarchy with a fact that in a
monarchic form of government the competition for the seat,
offices and posts is less as compared to aristocracy and that of
democracy. The major advantage he came up with was that the
monarchs of any country have the same interests as that of the
people.
9. LEVIATHAN:
Leviathan was written by Thomas Hobbes in
1651.
It is regarded as one of the earliest and most
influential examples of social contract theory.
Written during the English Civil War,
Leviathan argues that civil peace and social
unity are best achieved by the establishment
of a commonwealth through social contract.
Hobbes’s ideal commonwealth is ruled by a
sovereign power and granted absolute
authority to ensure the common defense.
10. COMMONWEALTH:
In his introduction, Hobbes describes this commonwealth as an
"artificial person" and as a body politic that mimics the human body.
The frontispiece to the first edition of Leviathan, which Hobbes
helped design, portrays the commonwealth as a gigantic human form
built out of the bodies of its citizens, the sovereign as its head.
Hobbes calls this figure the "Leviathan," a word derived from the
Hebrew for "sea monster" and the name of a monstrous sea creature
appearing in the Bible; the image constitutes the definitive metaphor
for Hobbes's perfect government.
His text attempts to prove the necessity of the Leviathan for
preserving peace and preventing civil war.
11. Book I of Leviathan contains the philosophical framework for the
entire text, while the remaining books simply extend and elaborate
the arguments presented in the initial chapters.
Hobbes describes human psychology without any reference to
greatest good, which he considers superfluous and given the
variability of human desires, there could be no such thing.
Book 2 of Leviathan details the process of standing the Leviathan,
outlines the rights of sovereigns and subjects, and imagines the
civil mechanics of the commonwealth.
Natural inclinations of men toward power impels them to break
contracts, thus the basic social contract of the commonwealth must
vest power in one central authority with power to punish those
who break the contract.
12. LAW OF NATURE:
• Hobbes concludes his first law of nature that natural man, in
order to preserve life, must seek peace.
• The second law of nature follows upon the mandate to seek
peace.
• The third law of nature states that it is not enough simply to
make contracts, but that we are required to keep the contracts we
make.
• The fourth law of nature is to show gratitude toward those who
maintain the contract so that no one will regret having complied
with the contract.
• The fifth law states that we must be accommodating to others for
the purpose of protecting the contract and not quarrel over minor
issues.
13. HOBBES’ INDIVIDUALISM:
"The natural state of man's life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and
short"
- Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes is generally identified as the most important direct predecessor
of modern individualist philosophy. Hobbes has ascribed to all
individuals natural liberty on the basis of which they are licensed to
undertake whatever actions are necessary in order to preserve
themselves from their fellow creatures.
Hobbes believed that the exercise of such natural liberty logically leads
to unceasing conflict and unremitting fear so long as no single
sovereign ruler exists to maintain peace.
Hence it can be summarized that the goal of Hobbes’ philosophy is
simply survival.
14. HOBBES’ HUMAN NATURE:
Hobbes believed that human beings naturally desire the power
to live well and that they will never be satisfied with the power
they have without acquiring more power. He believes there
usually succeeds a new desire such as fame and glory, ease and
sensual pleasure or admiration from others. He also believed
that all people are created equally. That everyone is equally
capable of killing each other. Hobbes believed that the nature of
humanity leads people to seek power.
15. CONSEQUENCES OF THE SOCIAL
CONTRACT THEORY:
• The force of the sovereign is absolute. This is on account of the
sovereign is the consequence of the agreement, not a gathering
to the contract. The contract is unavoidable. Men surrendered
all their rights to the sovereign.
• No force in the state ought to be permitted to test the sovereign.
The sovereign is additionally no punishable. The sovereign is
the sole judge to choose what is important for the peace and
safeguard of his subjects. Power may be government in light of
the fact that a ruler may give more noteworthy consistency in
arrangement.
• Sovereign has the power to hear and choose all debates in
regards to common or criminal laws.
• Sovereign has the power to announce war and close peace.
16. • Hobbes says that the subjects can delight in just those rights
which the sovereign licenses. Freedom is the endowment of the
sovereign. Liberty of the subject thus consisted in: 1. what the
sovereign has permitted. 2. What the sovereign has not
permitted and 3. The right of self-preservation which is retained
by the people.
• There is stand out contract in Hobbes. This is an agreement
entered into by the individuals among themselves. this
agreement secured a ruler. There is no agreement between the
individuals and the sovereign.
• Hobbes was attempting to accommodate a tyrant government
with political power as got from the individuals. the individuals
surrendered their common rights for the purpose of self-conservation.
Accordingly, they needed to pay a substantial cost
for peace.
17. CRITICISM:
Gauthier, Kleinerman, and Van Mill have given the most famous
critiques about Hobbes’ political philosophy.
• Logic versus Irrationality
• Curbing civil liberties
• Pessimistic ideas
• Anti Democratic
• Conception of limited resources
• Rejecting basic individual right
• Universalization of the appetites and aversions
• Contradiction
• Reality of a Leviathan