THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT WWW RESOURCES Presented By IQxplorer PAGE#1
There is a tremendous amount of information available on the World Wide Web.  Wether a student, teacher, researcher, businessperson, or interested individual searches the World Wide Web, the sheer volume of information can be overwhelming . As more people gain access to information on the Web and more content is continuously added, it is important to know how to evaluate Web sites to determine if the information is reliable . Most Web content is posted without any form of review for accuracy or reliability, so it is up to us to make sure that the information we find is credible.  INTRODUCTION PAGE#2
WHY CRITICALLY THINKING NEEDED Evaluating a site means applying individual judgment. G ood information on bad sites, and bad information on good sites . Information on the Web should be viewed as no more or less than information from other sources. Authorship on the Web does not mean “authority.” Evaluation of web sites is a means, not an end. PAGE#3
THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT    WWW  There are two   different types of evaluations of sites:     evaluation of the site itself  evaluation of the content.  Points for evaluation of content   What is the purpose of the Web Page & what does it contain? How complete and accurate are the information and  the links provided? How comprehensive is this site? How comprehensive is this site?
TYPES OF EVALUATION OF WEB SITES SAME AS PRINTED BOOKS AND JOURNALS EVALUATING INFORMATION FOUND ON THE INTERNET   PAGE#5
SAME AS PRINTED BOOKS  AND JOURNALS   PAGE#6     Date of Publication  Author  Edition or Revision     Publisher      Title of Journal       Intended Audience      Objective Reasoning      Coverage  Writing Style
EVALUATING INFORMATION FOUND ON THE  INTERNET PAGE#7 Authorship  Publishing body Point of view or bias  Referral to other sources  Verifiability  Currency
FIVE   CRITERIA   FOR   EVALUATING   WEB   PAGES   PAGE#8     Accuracy    Authority    Currency    Objectivity  Coverage
SIX KEY POINTS FOR EVALUATING WWW  PAGE#9 Accuracy   Authority  Content/ Coverage  Objective/Audience  Currency  Documentation
EVALUATING WEB BASED RESOURCES PRE-EVALUATION EVALUATION PAGE#10 Purpose  Source Contents Style and Functionality
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF  CONSTRUCTION OF WEB SITES PAGE#11 FORMAT AND APPEARANCE   FUNCTIONALITY SEARCHABILITY UNIQUENESS HELP FOR VISITORS
PAGE#12 CONCLUSION Wrong information is more harmful than correct information. If we make a decision based on wrong or unreliable information, we do not have power--we have defeat. So evaluation of the Word Wide Web is a must for all students, researchers and surfers, who use internet regularly.

Thinking Critically About WWW

  • 1.
    THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUTWWW RESOURCES Presented By IQxplorer PAGE#1
  • 2.
    There is atremendous amount of information available on the World Wide Web. Wether a student, teacher, researcher, businessperson, or interested individual searches the World Wide Web, the sheer volume of information can be overwhelming . As more people gain access to information on the Web and more content is continuously added, it is important to know how to evaluate Web sites to determine if the information is reliable . Most Web content is posted without any form of review for accuracy or reliability, so it is up to us to make sure that the information we find is credible. INTRODUCTION PAGE#2
  • 3.
    WHY CRITICALLY THINKINGNEEDED Evaluating a site means applying individual judgment. G ood information on bad sites, and bad information on good sites . Information on the Web should be viewed as no more or less than information from other sources. Authorship on the Web does not mean “authority.” Evaluation of web sites is a means, not an end. PAGE#3
  • 4.
    THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT WWW There are two different types of evaluations of sites:    evaluation of the site itself evaluation of the content. Points for evaluation of content What is the purpose of the Web Page & what does it contain? How complete and accurate are the information and the links provided? How comprehensive is this site? How comprehensive is this site?
  • 5.
    TYPES OF EVALUATIONOF WEB SITES SAME AS PRINTED BOOKS AND JOURNALS EVALUATING INFORMATION FOUND ON THE INTERNET PAGE#5
  • 6.
    SAME AS PRINTEDBOOKS AND JOURNALS PAGE#6    Date of Publication Author Edition or Revision   Publisher    Title of Journal     Intended Audience    Objective Reasoning    Coverage Writing Style
  • 7.
    EVALUATING INFORMATION FOUNDON THE INTERNET PAGE#7 Authorship Publishing body Point of view or bias Referral to other sources Verifiability Currency
  • 8.
    FIVE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING WEB PAGES PAGE#8   Accuracy   Authority   Currency   Objectivity Coverage
  • 9.
    SIX KEY POINTSFOR EVALUATING WWW PAGE#9 Accuracy Authority Content/ Coverage Objective/Audience Currency Documentation
  • 10.
    EVALUATING WEB BASEDRESOURCES PRE-EVALUATION EVALUATION PAGE#10 Purpose Source Contents Style and Functionality
  • 11.
    CRITERIA FOR EVALUATIONOF CONSTRUCTION OF WEB SITES PAGE#11 FORMAT AND APPEARANCE FUNCTIONALITY SEARCHABILITY UNIQUENESS HELP FOR VISITORS
  • 12.
    PAGE#12 CONCLUSION Wronginformation is more harmful than correct information. If we make a decision based on wrong or unreliable information, we do not have power--we have defeat. So evaluation of the Word Wide Web is a must for all students, researchers and surfers, who use internet regularly.