U.S. adults living with chronic disease are significantly less likely than healthy adults to have access to the internet (62% vs. 81%). The internet access gap creates an online health information gap. However, lack of internet access, not lack of interest in the topic, is the primary reason for the difference. Once online, having a chronic disease increases the probability that someone will take advantage of social media to share what they know and learn from their peers.
A slideshow providing a brief overview to different online health information sources, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each. Part of a LibGuide tutorial.
Director Lee Rainie presented to physicians, administrators, and staff at Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Burbank, California on January 12 on understanding social networking and online health information seeking.
Lee Rainie, Director of the Pew Internet Project, will describe the Project’s research on how patients and caregivers seek health information in the digital age and he will describe how people fit librarians into their general information needs as well as their specific health needs.
U.S. adults living with chronic disease are significantly less likely than healthy adults to have access to the internet (62% vs. 81%). The internet access gap creates an online health information gap. However, lack of internet access, not lack of interest in the topic, is the primary reason for the difference. Once online, having a chronic disease increases the probability that someone will take advantage of social media to share what they know and learn from their peers.
A slideshow providing a brief overview to different online health information sources, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each. Part of a LibGuide tutorial.
Director Lee Rainie presented to physicians, administrators, and staff at Providence St. Joseph Medical Center in Burbank, California on January 12 on understanding social networking and online health information seeking.
Lee Rainie, Director of the Pew Internet Project, will describe the Project’s research on how patients and caregivers seek health information in the digital age and he will describe how people fit librarians into their general information needs as well as their specific health needs.
Telehealth allows patients to have visits with health care providers remotely using video technology. Such visits are increasingly available and have the potential to make health care more accessible and convenient for patients. In May 2019, the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging asked a national sample of adults age 50–80 about their experiences with and opinions of telehealth.
Mpla 2009 The Impact Of Technology On Searching For Health Danielle De Jager ...dloftus
The Internet and other technologies are increasing opportunities for people to access health information. The Internet is significant in mediating the relationship between information and involvement in one’s own health care. Exchanges about health on the Internet are not just about disseminating information, or packaged health messages, but often involve linking to a shared community. Participation in health-related online social networks provides valuable support. A digital divide still exists, however the widespread acceptance of wireless communication and technologies by consumers who currently don’t have access to the Internet suggests that we should not underestimate the potential audience for technology innovation.
Name:: Danielle De Jager-Loftus
Institution:: The University of South Dakota. I.D. Weeks and Lommen Health Science Libraries
How do patients learn and seek healthcare information? What influence does technology have on patient healthcare communication? Our Patient Healthcare Communications report explores the answers to these questions and more.
Doctors in social media: the story so far, with Creation Pinpoint (slides)CREATION
Today we are seeing an explosion in doctors using public social media channels to talk with each other about clinical and practice matters. In this webcast, Daniel Ghinn presents some milestones in doctors' use of social media from recent years and reveals first-time insights from millions of analysed conversations between doctors online using Creation Pinpoint.
Also available as video webcast here: http://www.slideshare.net/CreationHealthcare/doctors-in-social-media-the-story-so-far
Online patients: characteristics and behaviour on health social networks - fe...Ricardo Sousa
Health social networks are created to allow patients to interact online.
In this presentation i cover some of the topics related to online health social networks: patient characteristics, criteria for user segmentation, and actual behaviour. I present a series of results related to actual search behaviour, user characteristics, self-tracking and patient quantified-self status, emotional content vs data, behavioural modification status, and comparability of online patient populations and offline populations.
Presented in the context of Vitanect.com activity.
As social networking is examined in the broader context of the health care field, and specifically the field of pharmacy, it is important to consider the perspective of patients. The patients whom we are providing care for will be at the center of this technology adoption, and understanding their behavior provides insight into the uptake of these technologies.
Plenary presentation at the 2018 annual convention of the Philippine Society for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. 22 Mar 2018, EDSA Shangrila Hotel.
Presentation to Ignite Columbus 4 about how social technologies can affect the transformation of health care from reactive medicine to medicine that is predictive, preventative, participatory, and personalized.
Telehealth allows patients to have visits with health care providers remotely using video technology. Such visits are increasingly available and have the potential to make health care more accessible and convenient for patients. In May 2019, the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging asked a national sample of adults age 50–80 about their experiences with and opinions of telehealth.
Mpla 2009 The Impact Of Technology On Searching For Health Danielle De Jager ...dloftus
The Internet and other technologies are increasing opportunities for people to access health information. The Internet is significant in mediating the relationship between information and involvement in one’s own health care. Exchanges about health on the Internet are not just about disseminating information, or packaged health messages, but often involve linking to a shared community. Participation in health-related online social networks provides valuable support. A digital divide still exists, however the widespread acceptance of wireless communication and technologies by consumers who currently don’t have access to the Internet suggests that we should not underestimate the potential audience for technology innovation.
Name:: Danielle De Jager-Loftus
Institution:: The University of South Dakota. I.D. Weeks and Lommen Health Science Libraries
How do patients learn and seek healthcare information? What influence does technology have on patient healthcare communication? Our Patient Healthcare Communications report explores the answers to these questions and more.
Doctors in social media: the story so far, with Creation Pinpoint (slides)CREATION
Today we are seeing an explosion in doctors using public social media channels to talk with each other about clinical and practice matters. In this webcast, Daniel Ghinn presents some milestones in doctors' use of social media from recent years and reveals first-time insights from millions of analysed conversations between doctors online using Creation Pinpoint.
Also available as video webcast here: http://www.slideshare.net/CreationHealthcare/doctors-in-social-media-the-story-so-far
Online patients: characteristics and behaviour on health social networks - fe...Ricardo Sousa
Health social networks are created to allow patients to interact online.
In this presentation i cover some of the topics related to online health social networks: patient characteristics, criteria for user segmentation, and actual behaviour. I present a series of results related to actual search behaviour, user characteristics, self-tracking and patient quantified-self status, emotional content vs data, behavioural modification status, and comparability of online patient populations and offline populations.
Presented in the context of Vitanect.com activity.
As social networking is examined in the broader context of the health care field, and specifically the field of pharmacy, it is important to consider the perspective of patients. The patients whom we are providing care for will be at the center of this technology adoption, and understanding their behavior provides insight into the uptake of these technologies.
Plenary presentation at the 2018 annual convention of the Philippine Society for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. 22 Mar 2018, EDSA Shangrila Hotel.
Presentation to Ignite Columbus 4 about how social technologies can affect the transformation of health care from reactive medicine to medicine that is predictive, preventative, participatory, and personalized.
Learn how to apply business concepts in order to attract new customers and then convert them to members. We discuss a specific business concept and explain how it relates to climbing gyms. You should be able to apply these business strategies to many facets of your business even though the main example in these articles will be auto belays.
LOS GRANDES TEMAS DE HARRY POTTER de Pedro Velasco SuárezFrank Stein
LOS GRANDES TEMAS DE HARRY POTTER de Pedro Velasco es un ensayo en el que autor plantea que la saga de Rowling ha pasado a la literatura universal porque toca temas que interesan a la humanidad como la AMISTAD, LA FAMILIA, LA VALENTÍA, LA VERDAD,,,
The Great American Search for Healthcare InformationWeber Shandwick
Weber Shandwick, in partnership with KRC Research, released The Great American Search for Healthcare Information, a survey of 1,700 American adults. The research focuses on Healthcare Information Seekers, or those who look for health-related information at least once a year.
Susannah Fox's presentation to the Health 2.0 Conference on 4/23/09. Participatory medicine is taking hold with both citizens and health professionals. But there are still pockets of people who lack access to the basic technology, lack the skills required to participate, or who may lack the sense that they are welcome.
In these slides, I briefly outline how the Internet is changing healthcare by empowering the consumer and the e-patient. We look at data and examples from the USA and Europe, and consider the impact of ratings websites, online health records, and the way in which doctors are responding to the e-patient.
Sabrina Kurtz-Rossi - eHealth and Older AdultsPlain Talk 2015
"Senior Surfing: eHealth and Older Adults" was presented at the Center for Health Literacy Conference 2011: Plain Talk in Complex Times by Sabrina Kurtz-Rossi, MEd, Principal, Kurtz-Rossi & Associates.
Description: This session will provide participants with information about eHealth literacy and techniques for helping older adults use the Internet to find health information for informed decision making and self-management of chronic disease.
Health and Technology Megatrends for #SBM2019Susannah Fox
The internet connects us not only with information, but also with each other. That deceptively simple insight is key to our work in improving health outcomes. This session will provide data from both national surveys and clinical studies to raise questions and awareness about peer to peer health care and other megatrends at the intersection of health and technology. Online engagement is a path out of the maze of illness and despair that we find ourselves in these days. Social media can be a platform for hope.
Major global survey asks people about their attitudes toward science
A new Wellcome Trust survey asked more than 140,000 people across 140 countries about their attitudes towards science and health, and found that nearly 75% of people say they trust a doctor or a nurse more than friends, family, or other sources of health advice. Here’s more:
•Vaccines: Some 80% of people worldwide agree that vaccines are safe. One in three people in France — the highest percentage anywhere in the world — disagree that vaccines are safe.
•Understanding of science: Men are more likely to claim an understanding than women, as are those aged 29 and younger. Almost two-thirds of people around the world expressed an interest in learning more science.
•Science and society: About a third of people in Africa and Central and South America don’t feel like they benefit from science.
This NEHI report reviews current tech trends which will impact the future of chronic disease management. The report categorizes these technologies into 4 classes based on the significant evidence supporting clinical and financial benefits. The technologies reviewed are:
Extended Care eVisits
Home Telehealth
In-Car Telehealth
Medication Adherence Tools
Mobile Asthma Management Tools
Mobile Cardiovascular Tools
Mobile Clinical Decision Support
Mobile Diabetes Management Tools
Social Media Promoting Health
Tele-Stroke Care
Virtual Visits
17% of cell phone owners do most of their online browsing on their phone, rather than a computer or other device. Most do so for convenience, but for some their phone is their only option for online access.
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...GL Anaacs
Contact us if you are interested:
Email / Skype : kefaya1771@gmail.com
Threema: PXHY5PDH
New BATCH Ku !!! MUCH IN DEMAND FAST SALE EVERY BATCH HAPPY GOOD EFFECT BIG BATCH !
Contact me on Threema or skype to start big business!!
Hot-sale products:
NEW HOT EUTYLONE WHITE CRYSTAL!!
5cl-adba precursor (semi finished )
5cl-adba raw materials
ADBB precursor (semi finished )
ADBB raw materials
APVP powder
5fadb/4f-adb
Jwh018 / Jwh210
Eutylone crystal
Protonitazene (hydrochloride) CAS: 119276-01-6
Flubrotizolam CAS: 57801-95-3
Metonitazene CAS: 14680-51-4
Payment terms: Western Union,MoneyGram,Bitcoin or USDT.
Deliver Time: Usually 7-15days
Shipping method: FedEx, TNT, DHL,UPS etc.Our deliveries are 100% safe, fast, reliable and discreet.
Samples will be sent for your evaluation!If you are interested in, please contact me, let's talk details.
We specializes in exporting high quality Research chemical, medical intermediate, Pharmaceutical chemicals and so on. Products are exported to USA, Canada, France, Korea, Japan,Russia, Southeast Asia and other countries.
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramLevi Shapiro
June 20, 2024, Prix Galien International and Jerusalem Ethics Forum in ROME. Detailed agenda including panels:
- ADVANCES IN CARDIOLOGY: A NEW PARADIGM IS COMING
- WOMEN’S HEALTH: FERTILITY PRESERVATION
- WHAT’S NEW IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS,
ONCOLOGICAL AND INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISEASES?
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICS
- GENE THERAPY
- BEYOND BORDERS: GLOBAL INITIATIVES FOR DEMOCRATIZING LIFE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
- ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN LIFE SCIENCES
- Prix Galien International Awards Ceremony
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
New Drug Discovery and Development .....NEHA GUPTA
The "New Drug Discovery and Development" process involves the identification, design, testing, and manufacturing of novel pharmaceutical compounds with the aim of introducing new and improved treatments for various medical conditions. This comprehensive endeavor encompasses various stages, including target identification, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and post-market surveillance. It involves multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, researchers, clinicians, regulatory experts, and pharmaceutical companies to bring innovative therapies to market and address unmet medical needs.
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
The Social Life of Health Information, 2011
1. The Social Life of
Health Information, 2011
Susannah Fox, Associate Director
May 12, 2011
Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project
1615 L St., NW – Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-419-4500 | pewinternet.org
http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-of-Health-Info.aspx
2. Summary of Findings
“I don’t know, but I can try to find out” is the default setting for
people with health questions.
The internet has changed people’s relationships with information. Our data consistently show that
doctors, nurses, and other health professionals continue to be the first choice for most people with
health concerns, but online resources, including advice from peers, are a significant source of health
information in the U.S.
These findings are based on a national telephone survey conducted in August and September 2010
among 3,001 adults in the U.S. The complete methodology and results are appended to this report.
The survey finds that, of the 74% of adults who use the internet:
80% of internet users have looked online for information about any of 15 health topics such as a
specific disease or treatment. This translates to 59% of all adults.
34% of internet users, or 25% of adults, have read someone else’s commentary or experience
about health or medical issues on an online news group, website, or blog.
25% of internet users, or 19% of adults, have watched an online video about health or medical
issues.
24% of internet users, or 18% of adults, have consulted online reviews of particular drugs or
medical treatments.
18% of internet users, or 13% of adults, have gone online to find others who might have health
concerns similar to theirs.
16% of internet users, or 12% of adults, have consulted online rankings or reviews of doctors or
other providers.
15% of internet users, or 11% of adults, have consulted online rankings or reviews of hospitals
or other medical facilities.
Of those who use social network sites (62% of adult internet users, or 46% of all adults):
23% of social network site users, or 11% of adults, have followed their friends’ personal health
experiences or updates on the site.
17% of social network site users, or 8% of adults, have used social networking sites to remember
or memorialize other people who suffered from a certain health condition.
15% of social network site users, or 7% of adults, have gotten any health information on the
sites.
pewinternet.org 2
3. “I know, and I want to share my knowledge” is the leading edge of
health care.
As broadband and mobile access spreads, more people have the ability – and increasingly, the habit – of
sharing what they are doing or thinking. In health care this translates to people tracking their workout
routines, posting reviews of their medical treatments, and raising awareness about certain health
conditions.
These are not yet mainstream activities, but there are pockets of highly-engaged patients and caregivers
who are taking an active role in tracking and sharing what they have learned.
Of adults who use the internet:
27% of internet users, or 20% of adults, have tracked their weight, diet, exercise routine or some
other health indicators or symptoms online.
6% of internet users, or 4% of adults, have posted comments, questions or information about
health or medical issues on a website of any kind, such as a health site or news site that allows
comments and discussion.
4% of internet users, or 3% of adults, have posted their experiences with a particular drug or
medical treatment.
4% of internet users, or 3% of adults, have posted a review online of a doctor.
3% of internet users, or 2% of adults, have posted a review online of a hospital.
Of adults who use social network sites:
14% of social network site users, or 6% of adults, have raised money for or drawn attention to a
health-related issue or cause.
11% of social network site users, or 5% of adults, have posted comments, queries, or
information about health or medical matters.
9% of social network site users, or 4% of adults, have started or joined a health-related group on
a social networking site.
The social life of health information is robust. The online conversation about health is being driven
forward by two forces: 1) the availability of social tools and 2) the motivation, especially among people
living with chronic conditions, to connect with each other.
pewinternet.org 3
4. Acknowledgements
This report is the result of collaboration between the Pew Internet Project and
the California HealthCare Foundation.
The Pew Internet & American Life Project is an initiative of the Pew Research Center, a nonprofit “fact
tank” that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. The
Project is nonpartisan and takes no position on policy issues. Support is provided by The Pew Charitable
Trusts.
The California HealthCare Foundation is an independent philanthropy committed to improving the way
health care is delivered and financed in California.
All quantitative, numerical data is based on a September 2010 national
telephone survey conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates
International (PSRAI).
PSRAI is an independent firm dedicated to high-quality research providing reliable, valid results for
clients in the United States and around the world.
pewinternet.org 4
5. Main Report
Social Media in Context
Health professionals and offline resources are central to health care, but people
use online social tools to gather information, share stories, and discuss
concerns.
This report sets out to illuminate the different ways people seek health information as well as how
people use online social tools to share knowledge with loved ones, fellow patients, and caregivers.
When asked to think about the last time they had a health issue, 70% of adults in the U.S. say they
received information, care, or support from a health professional. Fifty-four percent of adults say they
received such help from friends and family. Twenty percent of adults say they turned to others who
have the same health condition for information, care, or suppport. The vast majority of respondents say
those interactions happened offline.
The last time you had a health issue, did
Total Yes, Yes, Yes, Not a
you get information, care, or support yes online offline both source
from…
A doctor or other health care
professional 70% 1% 65% 4% 29%
Friends and family 54 1 41 12 44
Others who have the same health
condition 20 1 15 4 77
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September 13,
2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for the full
sample. Margins of error for sub-populations are higher.
However, three-quarters of U.S. adults (74%) use the internet and, of those, many participate in an
online conversation about health. For example:
80% of internet users have looked online for information about any one of 15 health topics such
as a specific disease or treatment.1 This translates to 59% of all adults.
34% of internet users have read someone else’s commentary or experience about health or
medical issues on an online news group, website, or blog.
1
For more details, see “Health Topics” (Pew Internet, 2011). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/HealthTopics.aspx
pewinternet.org 5
6. 14% of internet users have signed up to receive email updates or alerts about health or medical
issues.
6% of internet users have posted comments, questions or information about health or medical
issues on a website of some kind, such as a health site or news site that allows comments and
discussion.
5% of internet users have posted health-related comments, questions, or information in an
online discussion, a listserv, or other online group forum.
4% of internet users have posted such comments, questions or information on a blog.
These findings are similar to those we reported in 2009.2
This survey is the first time we collected the following data point:
25% of internet users have watched an online video about health or medical issues.
Internet users living with one or more chronic conditions3 are more likely than those who report no
conditions to have done three of the above activities: 37% have read someone else’s health
commentary online (vs. 31% of those reporting no chronic conditions), 31% have watched a health video
online (vs. 22% of those reporting no chronic conditions), and 23% have signed up to receive email
updates about certain health topics (vs. 9% of those reporting no chronic conditions).
Wireless users outpace other internet users on every one of the above activities by significant margins.
For example, 37% of wireless users have read about someone else’s health experience online, compared
with 24% of other internet users. Twenty-seven percent of wireless users have watched an online health
video, compared with 21% of other users.
Social network sites are popular, but used only sparingly for health updates and
queries.
As of September 2010, 62% of adult internet users report using a social network site like MySpace or
Facebook. Of that group:
23% of social networking site users have followed their friends’ personal health experiences or
updates on the site. This translates to 11% of all adults.
17% have used social network sites to remember or memorialize other people who suffered
from a certain health condition.
15% have gotten any health information on the sites.
14% have raised money for or drawn attention to a health-related issue or cause.
2
“The Social Life of Health Information” (Pew Internet: 2009). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx
3
Respondents were asked if they have high blood pressure; diabetes; asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, or other
lung conditions; heart disease, heart failure, or heart attack; cancer; or any other chronic health problem or
condition.
pewinternet.org 6
7. 11% have posted comments, queries, or information about health or medical matters.
9% have started or joined a health-related group on a social networking site.
People caring for loved ones are more likely than other adults to use social
network sites to gather and share health information and support.
More than a quarter of adults in the U.S. provide unpaid care to a loved one. Twenty-seven percent of
adults care for an adult relative or friend; 5% of adults care for a child with a health condition or
disability.4
Caregivers are one group that is significantly more likely than others to use social network sites for
health-related pursuits: 28% of caregivers who use social networks sites say they follow friends’ health
updates, compared with 21% of other social network site users. Twenty percent of caregivers who use
social network sites say they have gathered health information on such a site, compared with 12% of
other users.
Social network sites are not a significant source of health information for most people, but they can be a
source of encouragement and care. In a book about social support, Consequential Strangers, authors
Melinda Blau and Karen Fingerman write about how people in our wide circles of acquaintance “offer
practical assistance, firsthand information, and a special brand of no-strings emotional comfort.”5
On a practical level, the vast majority of people living with chronic conditions never attend traditional,
in-person support group meetings, although studies show they could benefit from such groups.6 Instead,
people often mobilize their “social convoy” of family members, friends, colleagues, fellow patients, and
fellow caregivers – many of whom are now connected online via email, social network sites, or by other
means. As Blau and Fingerman describe it:
A natural network provides a safety net and puts the patient in charge—a good balance in any
situation. Think of it as customizing your convoy. If people who are already on board don’t have
the information, experience, or empathy you need, you enlist others who do.7
In a pattern that matches this observation, people living with one or more chronic conditions and those
living with disability8 are significantly more likely than other social network site users to gather health
4
The word “caregivers” is used throughout this report to refer to people who, in the past 12 months, have
provided unpaid care to a parent, child, friend, or other loved one. Unpaid care for an adult may include help with
personal needs or household chores, managing finances, arranging for outside services, or visiting regularly to see
how they are doing. Unpaid care to a child includes care for an ongoing or serious short-term condition, emotional
or behavioral problems, or developmental problems.
5
Melinda Blau and Karen L. Fingerman, PhD, Consequential Strangers: The Power of People Who Don't Seem to
Matter. . . But Really Do (W. W. Norton & Company, 2009). See: http://www.consequentialstrangers.com/about/
6
Jason E. Owen et al., “Use of Health-Related and Cancer-Specific Support Groups Among Adult Cancer Survivors”
(Cancer 69, 2007). See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17503435
7
Blau and Fingerman (2009).
8
Respondents were asked six separate questions about physical and mental abilities.
pewinternet.org 7
8. information on these sites. Twenty percent of social network site users living with chronic conditions do
so, compared with 12% of social network site users who report no chronic conditions. Twenty-three
percent of social network site users living with disability get health information on these sites, compared
with 13% of those who report no disability.
Relatively few use hospital ranking and doctor review sites.
Hospital and doctor review sites have not yet become health care decision-making tools for most
consumers. One national survey found that only 6% of American adults are aware of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid’s Hospital Compare tool.9 Our current survey finds a similarly low usage of such
sites among adult internet users, matching trends we first reported in 2009.10
16% of internet users have consulted online rankings or reviews of doctors or other providers.
15% of internet users have consulted online rankings or reviews of hospitals or other medical
facilities.
4% of internet users have posted a review online of a doctor.
3% of internet users have posted a review online of a hospital.
Again, caregivers are more likely than other groups to engage in these activities. For example, 21% of
online caregivers consult online doctor reviews, compared with 13% of internet users not currently
caring for a loved one. Twenty percent of online caregivers consult online hospital reviews, compared
with 12% of other internet users.
Eighteen percent of internet users living with one or more chronic conditions have looked online for
doctor rankings or reviews, compared with 14% of internet users who report no conditions. Six percent
of internet users living with chronic disease have posted such a review, compared with 3% of those who
report no conditions. Both of those differences are statistically significant, but more importantly, they
are significant because of the context of who is most likely to be a frequent health care consumer:
someone living with a chronic condition.
Internet users living with disability do not report a higher or lower likelihood to consult hospital rankings
and doctor reviews. However, they are more likely than other internet users to post reviews of doctors
and other health professionals online: 8% do so, compared with 4% of those who report no disability.
9
Tara Lagu and Peter K. Lindenauer, “Putting the Public Back in Public Reporting of Health Care Quality.” (Journal
of the American Medical Association: 2010;304(15):1711-1712.) See: http://jama.ama-
assn.org/content/304/15/1711.extract
10
The Social Life of Health Information, 2009.
pewinternet.org 8
9. One in four adult internet users have consulted online reviews of drugs or
treatments.
In November 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration held a public hearing on how companies use
the internet, particularly social media, to promote prescription drugs, medical devices, and other
regulated products.11 No regulations have been issued to date. But because of this heightened interest
in how consumers gather and share information about drugs, we added a new category of online
reviews to the current survey and find:
24% of internet users have consulted online reviews of particular drugs or medical treatments.
4% of internet users have posted their experiences with a particular drug or medical treatment.
Fully 38% of online caregivers have consulted online drug reviews, compared with 18% of internet users
who do not take care of a loved one. Seven percent of online caregivers have posted such a review,
compared with just 2% of other internet users.
Thirty-one percent of internet users living with one or more chronic conditions have looked at online
drug reviews, compared with 20% of internet users reporting no conditions. Six percent of internet users
living with chronic disease have posted an online review of a drug or treatment, compared with 2% of
those with no conditions.
Internet users living with disability are just as likely as other people to look up drug reviews, but they are
more likely than other people to say they have posted their own treatment experiences online. Nine
percent of internet users living with disability say they have posted a review of a drug or treatment,
compared with 2% of those who report no disability.
In a separate question we find that 24% of internet users say they go online to look for information
about drug safety or recalls.12
One in four adult internet users track their own health data online.
Carol Torgan, a health science strategist, points out that anyone who makes note of their blood
pressure, weight, or menstrual cycle could be categorized as a “self-tracker.”13 Add an online
component, and you have the ingredients for a social health application or an electronic health record.
Our survey finds that 15% of internet users have tracked their weight, diet, or exercise routine online. In
addition, 17% of internet users have tracked any other health indicators or symptoms online. Fully 27%
of adult internet users say yes to either question.
11
See: http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ucm184250.htm
12
For more details, please see “Health Topics” (Pew Internet: 2011). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/HealthTopics.aspx
13
Carol Torgan, “Self-tracking, Sensors, and mHealth: Trends and Opportunities.” (Presentation to the 2011
mHealth Networking Conference.) See: http://www.caroltorgan.com/self-tracking-sensors-mhealth/
pewinternet.org 9
10. Wireless users are more likely than other internet users to track health data online. Eighteen percent of
wireless users have tracked their weight, diet, or exercise routine online, compared with 9% of internet
users who do not have a wireless-enabled laptop or other device. Nineteen percent of wireless users
have tracked any other health indicators or symptoms online, compared with 11% of non-wireless
internet users.
Separately, looking just at the 85% of adults who own a cell phone, 9% say they have software
applications or “apps” on their phones that help them track or manage their health.
pewinternet.org 10
11. Mobile health apps
Percentage of cell phone users in each group who have a software application or "app" on
their phone to help them track or manage their health
Total cell phone users 9%
Gender
Male 10
Female 8
Race
White 7
African American 15*
Hispanic 11
Age (at time of survey)
18-29 15*
30-49 8
50-64 6
65+ 5
Education
Some high school 9
High school graduate 6
Some college 13*
College graduate or more 9
Household Income
< $30,000 7
$30,000 - $49,999 8
$50,000 - $74,999 12
$75,000+ 11
Language
English 9*
Spanish 1
Community Type
Rural 4
Suburban 9
Urban 12*
* indicates a significant difference
Source: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September 13,
2010 Tracking Survey. N=3,001 adults and N for cell phone users=2,485. The margin of error
is +/- 2.5 percentage points for all adults and 3 points for cell phone users.
pewinternet.org 11
12. More people report being helped, rather than harmed, by online health
information.
One in three adults in the U.S. (30%) say they or someone they know has been helped by following
medical advice or health information found online.
Have you or anyone you know been helped by following medical advice or
health information found on the internet?
All adults Total helped
Yes, major help 6%
Yes, moderate help 15 30%
Yes, minor help 9
No/don’t know/refused 69 -
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-
September 13, 2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3
percentage points for the full sample.
Fully 44% of caregivers report that online health resources have been helpful. Adults who went through
a recent personal health change – gaining or losing a lot of weight, becoming pregnant, or quitting
smoking – are also especially likely to report being helped by online resources: 40% do so, compared
with 28% of other adults.
Ten percent of adults living with two or more chronic conditions – unfortunately a large and growing
slice of the population in the U.S. – say they or someone they know has received major help from online
health information, compared with 5% of adults who report no conditions.
Just 3% of adults say they or someone they know has been harmed.
Have you or anyone you know been harmed by following medical advice
or health information found on the internet?
All adults Total harmed
No/don’t know/refused 97% -
Yes, minor harm 1
Yes, moderate harm 1 3%
Yes, serious harm 1
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-
September 13, 2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3
percentage points for the full sample.
pewinternet.org 12
13. Health Topics
Eight in ten adult internet users look for information online.
Again, 80% of internet users have looked online for information about at least one of the following
topics:14
The % of adult internet users who have looked online for information
about…
66 specific disease or medical problem
56 certain medical treatment or procedure
44 doctors or other health professionals
36 hospitals or other medical facilities
33 health insurance, including private insurance, Medicare or Medicaid
29 food safety or recalls
24 drug safety or recalls
22 environmental health hazards
19 pregnancy and childbirth
17 memory loss, dementia, or Alzheimer’s
16 medical test results
14 how to manage chronic pain
12 long-term care for an elderly or disabled person
7 end-of-life decisions
28 another health topic not included in the survey
80 at least one of the above topics
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September
13, 2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for
the full sample.
Internet access drives information access.
Since one-quarter of U.S. adults do not go online, the percentage of health information seekers is lower
when calculated as a percentage of the total population: 59% of all adults in the U.S. look online for
health information.
Women, non-Hispanic whites, younger adults, and those with higher levels of education and income are
more likely than other demographic groups to gather health information online.
14
“Health Topics” (2011). See: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/HealthTopics.aspx
pewinternet.org 13
14. There are two forces at play in the data: access to the internet and interest in health information. For
example, women and men are equally likely to have access to the internet, but women are more likely
than men to report gathering health information online, which explains the gender gap in the chart
below. For the other groups, their overall lower rate of internet adoption combined with lower levels of
health information seeking online drives their numbers down significantly when compared with other
adults.
Looking online for health information: Demographics
Percentage who
Percentage who go
look online for
online
health information
All adults in the U.S. 74% 59%
Gender
Male 73 53
Female 75 65
Race
White 77 63
African American 66 47
Latino 62 45
Age
18-29 92 71
30-49 79 66
50-64 71 58
65+ 40 29
Education
Some high school 38 24
High school 64 45
Some college 84 70
College graduate 91 81
Household income
< $30,000 57 41
$30,000 - $49,999 80 66
$50,000 - $74,999 86 71
$75,000+ 95 83
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September
13, 2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for
the full sample. Margins of error for sub-populations are higher.
pewinternet.org 14
15. As we have reported in the past, people who are living with chronic disease or disability are likely, if they
have internet access, to be highly interested in online health information.15 For those two groups, it is
their lack of access to the internet which holds them back from parity with people who report no
chronic conditions or disability.
Two other groups with higher rates of online health information gathering include caregivers and people
who went through a recent medical emergency.
Looking online for health information: Health status
Percentage who look
Percentage who
online for health
go online
information
All adults in the U.S. 74% 59%
Caregiver status
Currently caring for a loved one (N=860) 79 70
Not a caregiver 71 54
Recent medical crisis
Experienced within past year – self or someone
76 65
close (N=982)
No recent experience 72 55
Recent personal health change
Experienced within past year (N=499) 68 56
No recent experience 75 59
Chronic disease status
One or more chronic conditions (N=1488) 64 53
No conditions 81 62
Disability status
One or more disabilities (N=906) 54 42
No disabilities 81 65
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September 13, 2010 Survey.
N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for the full sample. Margins of error
for sub-populations are higher.
15
“Chronic Disease and the Internet” (Pew Internet Project: March 24, 2010). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Chronic-Disease.aspx
pewinternet.org 15
16. Health information is going mobile.
Eighty-five percent of adults in the U.S. own a cell phone. Of those, 17% have used their phone to look
up health or medical information. By comparison, seven in ten cell phone owners send or receive text
messages; seven in ten use their phones to take pictures; four in ten access the internet on their
phones; and 35% have software applications or “apps” on their phones.16
Percentage who own a Percentage who use a cell phone
cell phone to look for health info
All adults in the U.S. 85% 15%
Gender
Male 88 15
Female 82 13
Race
White 85 13
African American 79 15
Latino 84 21
Age
18-29 96 28
30-49 90 16
50-64 85 6
65+ 58 5
Education
Some high school 69 16
High school 82 10
Some college 91 19
College graduate 90 18
Household income
< $30,000 75 11
$30,000 - $49,999 90 15
$50,000 - $74,999 93 16
$75,000+ 95 18
Language
English 85 15
Spanish (N=197) 74 10
Community type
Rural 77 9
Suburban 86 14
Urban 84 18
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September 13, 2010
Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for the full sample.
Margins of error for sub-populations are higher.
16
“The Rise of Apps Culture” (Pew Internet Project: September 14, 2010). Available at: http://
pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/The-Rise-of-Apps-Culture.aspx
pewinternet.org 16
17. The typical search for health information is on behalf of someone else.
Half of internet users (48%) who go online for health information say their last search was on behalf of
another person, 36% say their last search was on behalf of themselves, and 11% say it was both for
themselves and someone else. Thus, while eight in ten internet users go online for health information,
the impact of their inquiries may be even broader. And while some groups, such as the chronically ill and
those living with disability, are less likely to be online and searching for health information, it does not
mean that this information does not reach them through a surrogate of some kind.
pewinternet.org 17
18. Peer-to-peer Healthcare
One in five adult internet users have gone online to find others with health
concerns similar to their own.
The internet connects people who share interests of all kinds and health is no exception. Eighteen
percent of internet users have gone online to find others who might have health concerns similar to
theirs. 17 Twenty-three percent of internet users living with at least one of five chronic conditions named
in the survey have looked online for someone with similar health concerns, compared with 15% of those
who report no conditions.
Looking online for someone like you: Health status
Percentage of internet users in
each group who have looked
online for others with similar
health concerns
All internet users 18%
Caregiver status
Currently caring for a loved one 26*
Not a caregiver 15
Recent medical crisis
Experienced within past year –
23*
self or someone close
No recent experience 16
Recent personal health change
Experienced within past year 24*
No recent experience 17
Chronic disease status
One or more chronic conditions 23*
No conditions 15
Disability status
One or more disabilities (N=439) 20
No disabilities 18
* indicates a significant difference
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-
September 13, 2010 Survey. N=2065 internet users age 18+. Margin of error is
+/- 3 percentage points for the full sample. Margins of error for sub-
populations are higher.
17
“Peer-to-peer Healthcare” (Pew Internet Project: February 28, 2011). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/P2PHealthcare.aspx
pewinternet.org 18
19. Internet users who have experienced a recent medical emergency, their own or someone else’s, are also
more likely than other internet users to go online to try to find someone who shares their situation:
23%, compared with 16%. This fits the pattern observed in Pew Internet’s other research that people
going through a medical crisis are voracious information consumers: 85% say they look online for health
information, compared with 77% of internet users who have not had that experience in the past year.
Internet users who have experienced a significant change in their physical health, such as weight loss or
gain, pregnancy, or quitting smoking are also more likely than other internet users to have looked online
for someone like them.
Health professionals, friends, family members, and fellow patients are all part of
the mix.
Even with the proliferation of mobile and online opportunities, however, most adults’ search for health
information remains anchored in the offline world. Most people turn to a health professional, friend, or
family member when they have a health question; the internet plays a growing but still supplemental
role – and mobile connectivity has not changed that.
Again, when asked about the last time they had a health issue, 70% of adults in the U.S. say they
received information, care, or support from a health professional. Fifty-four percent of adults say they
turned to friends and family. Twenty percent of adults say they turned to others who have the same
health condition.
The majority of these interactions happen offline: just 5% of adults say they received online information,
care, or support from a health professional, 13% say they had online contact with friends and family,
and 5% say they interacted online with fellow patients.
The last time you had a health issue, did
Total Yes, Yes, Yes, Not a
you get information, care, or support
yes online offline both source
from…
A doctor or other health care
professional 70% 1% 65% 4% 29%
Friends and family 54 1 41 12 44
Others who have the same health
condition 20 1 15 4 77
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-September 13,
2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for the full
sample. Margins of error for sub-populations are higher.
pewinternet.org 19
20. People turn to different sources for different kinds of information.
All adults were asked which group is more helpful when they need certain types of information or
support: health professionals like doctors and nurses or peers like fellow patients, friends, and family.
The pattern of responses was pretty clear: When the item involved technical issues related to a health
issue, professionals held sway. When the item involved more personal issues of how to cope with a
health issue or get quick relief, then non-professionals were preferred by most patients.
Professional Fellow
Who is more helpful when you sources like patients, Both
need… doctors and friends, and equally
nurses family
Times when professionals matter most
An accurate medical diagnosis 91% 5% 2%
Information about prescription
drugs 85 9 3
Information about alternative
treatments 63 24 5
A recommendation for a doctor
or specialist 62 27 6
A recommendation for a
hospital or other medical facility 62 27 6
Times when non-professionals matter most
Emotional support in dealing
with a health issue 30 59 5
A quick remedy for an everyday
health issue 41 51 4
Times when the two groups are equally helpful
Practical advice for coping with
day-to-day health situations 43 46 6
Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, August 9-
September 13, 2010 Survey. N=3001 adults and the margin of error is +/- 3
percentage points for the full sample.
Many people find the internet to be a valuable tool, whether they are using it to search for a quick
answer or gain a deeper understanding of a new treatment option or prescription. The internet is also,
as this study shows, a way to tap into our instincts to gather together, help other people, and be helped
ourselves.
pewinternet.org 20
21. Methodology
National Telephone Survey
All numerical results in this report are based on data from telephone interviews conducted by Princeton
Survey Research Associates International between August 9 and September 13, 2010, among a sample
of 3,001 adults, age 18 and older. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. For results based
on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling is plus or
minus 2.5 percentage points. For results based on internet users (n=2,065), the margin of sampling
error is plus or minus 2.9 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and
practical difficulties in conducting telephone surveys may introduce some error or bias into the findings
of opinion polls.
A combination of landline and cellular random digit dial (RDD) samples was used to represent all adults
in the continental United States who have access to either a landline or cellular telephone. Both samples
were provided by Survey Sampling International, LLC (SSI) according to PSRAI specifications. The
landline sample for this survey was designed to generalize to the U.S. adult population and to
oversample African Americans and Hispanics. To achieve these objectives in a cost effective manner, the
design uses standard list-assisted random digit dialing (RDD) methodology, but telephone numbers are
drawn disproportionately from telephone exchanges with higher than average density of African
American and/or Hispanic households. The cellular sample was not list-assisted, but was drawn through
a systematic sampling from dedicated wireless 100-blocks and shared service 100-blocks with no
directory-listed landline numbers.
New sample was released daily and was kept in the field for at least five days. The sample was released
in replicates, which are representative subsamples of the larger population. This ensures that complete
call procedures were followed for the entire sample. At least 7 attempts were made to complete an
interview at a sampled telephone number. The calls were staggered over times of day and days of the
week to maximize the chances of making contact with a potential respondent. Each number received at
least one daytime call in an attempt to find someone available. For the landline sample, half of the time
interviewers first asked to speak with the youngest adult male currently at home. If no male was at
home at the time of the call, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult female. For the other
half of the contacts interviewers first asked to speak with the youngest adult female currently at home.
If no female was available, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult male at home. For the
cellular sample, interviews were conducted with the person who answered the phone. Interviewers
verified that the person was an adult and in a safe place before administering the survey. Cellular
sample respondents were offered a post-paid cash incentive for their participation. All interviews
completed on any given day were considered to be the final sample for that day.
Disproportionate sampling and non-response in telephone interviews can produce biases in survey-
derived estimates. The dataset was weighted in two stages. The first stage of weighting corrected for
the disproportionate landline sample design and also accounted for the overlapping landline and cellular
sample frames as well as different probabilities of selection associated with the number of adults in the
household. The second stage of weighting matched overall sample demographics to population
parameters. The demographic weighting parameters are derived from a special analysis of the most
recently available Census Bureau’s March 2009 Annual Social and Economic Supplement. This analysis
produces population parameters for the demographic characteristics of adults age 18 or older. These
pewinternet.org 21
22. parameters are then compared with the sample characteristics to construct sample weights. The
weights are derived using an iterative technique that simultaneously balances the distribution of all
weighting parameters. Following is the full disposition of all sampled telephone numbers:
Table 1:Sample Disposition
Landline Cell
53,160 17,075 Total Numbers Dialed
2,613 441 Non-residential
2,430 32 Computer/Fax
21 --- Cell phone
27,936 6,428 Other not working
4,308 311 Additional projected not working
15,852 9,863 Working numbers
29.8% 57.8% Working Rate
1,436 104 No Answer / Busy
2,734 2,370 Voice Mail
84 17 Other Non-Contact
11,598 7,372 Contacted numbers
73.2% 74.7% Contact Rate
1,020 1,027 Callback
8,303 4,597 Refusal
2,275 1,748 Cooperating numbers
19.6% 23.7% Cooperation Rate
158 60 Language Barrier
--- 646 Child's cell phone
2,117 1,042 Eligible numbers
93.1% 59.6% Eligibility Rate
116 42 Break-off
2,001 1,000 Completes
94.5% 96.0% Completion Rate
13.6% 17.0% Response Rate
The disposition reports all of the sampled telephone numbers ever dialed from the original telephone
number samples. The response rate estimates the fraction of all eligible respondents in the sample that
were ultimately interviewed. At PSRAI it is calculated by taking the product of three component rates:
Contact rate – the proportion of working numbers where a request for interview was made
pewinternet.org 22
23. Cooperation rate – the proportion of contacted numbers where a consent for interview was at
least initially obtained, versus those refused
Completion rate – the proportion of initially cooperating and eligible interviews that were
completed
Thus the response rate for the landline sample was 13.6 percent. The response rate for the cellular
sample was 17.0 percent.
pewinternet.org 23
24. Questions
August Health Tracking Survey 2010 Final Topline 9/17/10
Data for August 9 – September 13, 2010
Princeton Survey Research Associates International
for the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project
Sample: n= 3,001 national adults, age 18 and older, including 1,000 cell phone interviews
Interviewing dates: 08.09.10 – 09.13.10
Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on Total [n=3,001]
Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on internet users [n=2,065]
Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone users [n=2,485]
Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on online health seekers [n=1,655]
Q1 Overall, how would you rate the quality of life for you and your family today? Would you say it
is… excellent, very good, good, fair or poor?
CURRENT
% 17 Excellent
26 Very good
34 Good
16 Fair
6 Poor
* Don’t know
* Refused
Q6a Do you use the internet, at least occasionally?
Q6b Do you send or receive email, at least occasionally?
DOES NOT USE
USES INTERNET INTERNET
74 26
Current
Q7 Did you happen to use the internet YESTERDAY?
Based on all internet users [N=2,065]
YES, USED INTERNET NO, DID NOT USE
YESTERDAY INTERNET YESTERDAY DON’T KNOW REFUSED
76 24 * 0
Current
pewinternet.org 24
25. Q8 About how often do you use the internet or email from … *INSERT IN ORDER+ – several times a
day, about once a day, 3-5 days a week, 1-2 days a week, every few weeks, less often or never?
Based on all internet users [N=2,065]
SEVERAL ABOUT EVERY
TIMES A ONCE A 3-5 DAYS 1-2 DAYS FEW LESS DON’T
DAY DAY A WEEK A WEEK WEEKS OFTEN NEVER KNOW REFUSED
a. Home
Current 43 21 13 12 3 3 5 * *
b. Work
Current 34 7 4 4 1 2 48 * 1
There is no Question Q9.
Q10 As I read the following list of items, please tell me if you happen to have each one, or not. Do
you have… *INSERT ITEMS IN ORDER]?
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. A desktop computer
Current 59 40 * *
b. A laptop computer or netbook
Current 52 48 * *
c. A cell phone or a Blackberry or
iPhone or other device that is
also a cell phone
Current 85 15 * *
d. An electronic book device or e-
Book reader, such as a Kindle or
Sony Digital Book
Current 5 95 * *
e. An iPod or other MP3 player
Current 47 53 * *
f. A game console like Xbox or
Play Station
Current 42 57 * *
g. A tablet computer like an iPad
Current 4 96 * *
pewinternet.org 25
26. Q11 Does anyone in your household have a working cell phone?
Based on non-cell phone users
CURRENT
% 33 Yes
67 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
[n=516]
Q12 On your laptop computer or netbook, do you ever use a wireless connection such as WIFI or
mobile wireless broadband to access the internet?
Based on internet users who have a laptop or netbook
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
Current [N=1,327] 84 16 1 *
Q13 Thinking now just about your cell phone… Please tell me if you ever use your cell phone to do
any of the following things. Do you ever use your cell phone to [INSERT ITEMS; ALWAYS ASK a-b
FIRST in order; RANDOMIZE c-e]?
Based on cell phone users
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Send or receive email
34 66 * 0
Current [N=2,485]
b. Send or receive text messages
74 26 * 0
Current
c. Send or receive Instant Messages
30 70 * *
Current
d. Access the internet
39 61 * 0
Current
e. Participate in a video call, video
chat or teleconference
7 93 * *
Current
pewinternet.org 26
27. 18
WIRELESS Wireless internet use
WIRELESS INTERNET INTERNET USER BUT
USER NOT WIRELESS ALL OTHERS
Current 57 20 23
Q14 On your cell phone, do you happen to have any software applications or “apps” that help you
track or manage your health, or not?
Based on cell phone users [N=2,485]
CURRENT
% 9 Yes
90 No
1 Don’t know
* Refused
Q15 Do you ever use your cell phone to look up health or medical information?
Based on cell phone users [N=2,485]
CURRENT
% 17 Yes, do this
83 No, do not do this
* Don’t know
0 Refused
WEB1 Next... Please tell me if you ever use the internet to do any of the following things. Do you ever
use the internet to…? / Did you happen to do this yesterday, or not?
Based on all internet users [N=2,065]
TOTAL HAVE
EVER DONE ---------- DID HAVE NOT
THIS YESTERDAY DONE THIS DON’T KNOW REFUSED
Send or read e-mail
Current 91 61 9 * *
Get news online
Current 72 39 28 * 0
Research a product or service online
Current 78 28 22 * *
Take part in chat rooms or online
discussions with other people
18
Definitions for wireless internet use may vary from survey to survey.
pewinternet.org 27
28. Current 22 7 78 * 0
Play online games
Current 36 13 64 0 *
Search online for a map or driving
directions
Current 82 14 18 * *
PAY to access or download digital content
online, such as music, video, or
newspaper articles
Current 43 10 56 * 0
Pay bills online
Current 57 15 43 * *
Use a social networking site like
MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn.com
Current 62 39 38 * 0
Categorize or tag online content like a
photo, news story or blog post
Current 33 11 66 1 *
Post a comment or review online about a
product you bought or a service you
received
Current 32 4 67 * *
Use Twitter or another service to share
updates about yourself or to see updates
about others
Current 24 13 76 * 0
Participate in a video call, video chat or
teleconference
Current 23 4 77 * 0
Use a service such as Foursquare or
Gowalla that allows you to share your
location with friends and to find others
who are near you
Current 4 1 96 * 0
Q16 In general, how would you rate your own health — excellent, good, only fair, or poor?
CURRENT
% 30 Excellent
49 Good
16 Only fair
5 Poor
* Don’t know
* Refused
pewinternet.org 28
29. Q17 Are you now living with any of the following health problems or conditions — [INSERT;
RANDOMIZE a-e; ASK f LAST]?
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Diabetes or sugar diabetes
Current 11 89 * *
b. High blood pressure
Current 24 75 1 *
c. Asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, or other
lung conditions
Current 12 88 * *
d. Heart disease, heart failure or heart attack
Current 6 94 * *
e. Cancer
Current 2 97 * *
f. Any other chronic health problem or
condition I haven’t already mentioned
Current 17 82 * 1
Q18 In the last 12 months, have you personally faced a serious medical emergency or crisis?
CURRENT
% 12 Yes
88 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
Q19 And in the last 12 months, have you experienced any other significant change in your physical
health, such as gaining or losing a lot of weight, becoming pregnant, or quitting smoking?
CURRENT
% 17 Yes
83 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
Q20 Is there anyone close to you who has a CHRONIC medical condition, such as asthma, diabetes,
heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer, or another chronic condition?
CURRENT
% 47 Yes
53 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
pewinternet.org 29
30. Q21 In the last 12 months, has anyone close to you faced a serious medical emergency or crisis?19
CURRENT DEC 2008 AUGUST 2006
% 27 Yes 31 34
72 No 69 65
* Don’t know * 1
* Refused * --
19
Trend question wording was “And in the last 12 months, have you or has someone close to you faced a serious
medical emergency or crisis?”
pewinternet.org 30
31. 22 Now, we’d like to ask if you’ve looked for information ONLINE about certain health or medical
issues. Specifically, have you ever looked online for… *INSERT ITEM; ASK a-d IN ORDER;
RANDOMIZE e-n; ASK o LAST]?
Based on all internet users [N=2,065] YES, HAVE NO, HAVE NOT
DONE THIS DONE THIS DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Information about a specific disease or
medical problem
Current 66 34 * *
December 2008 66 34 * 0
August 2006 64 36 * --
November 23-30, 2004 66 34 * --
December 2002 63 37 * --
b. Information about a certain medical
treatment or procedure
Current 56 44 * *
December 2008 55 45 * *
August 2006 51 48 1 --
November 23-30, 2004 51 48 * --
December 2002 47 53 0 --
c. Information about doctors or other health
professionals
Current 44 56 * *
December 2008 47 53 * *
d. Information about hospitals or other
medical facilities
Current 36 64 * *
December 2008 38 62 * *
e. Information related to health insurance,
including private insurance, Medicare or
Medicaid
Current 33 67 * *
December 2008 37 63 0 *
August 200620 33 67 * --
Q22 continued…
20
August 2006 trend was recalculated to reflect combined responses for two separate items: “Information related
to health insurance” and “Information about Medicare or Medicaid”
pewinternet.org 31
32. Q22 continued…
YES, HAVE NO, HAVE NOT
DONE THIS DONE THIS DON’T KNOW REFUSED
f. Information about environmental health
hazards
Current 22 77 * *
August 2006 22 78 * --
November 23-30, 2004 18 82 0 --
December 2002 17 83 * --
g. Information about pregnancy and
childbirth
Current 19 81 * *
h. Information about end-of-life decisions
Current 7 93 * *
i. Information about long-term care for an
elderly or disabled person
Current 12 88 * *
j. Information about food safety or recalls
Current 29 70 * *
k. Information about drug safety or recalls
Current 24 76 * *
l. Information about how to manage chronic
pain
Current 14 86 * *
m. Information about medical test results
Current 16 83 * *
n. Information about memory loss,
dementia, or Alzheimer’s
Current 17 83 * *
o. Information about any other health issue
Current 28 72 * *
December 2008 26 73 1 *
Total yes to any item above 80
Total no to all items 20
pewinternet.org 32
33. Q23 Thinking about the LAST time you went online for health or medical information… Did you go
online to look for information related to YOUR OWN health or medical situation or SOMEONE
ELSE’S health or medical situation?
Based on online health seekers
CURRENT DECEMBER 2008 AUGUST 2006 DECEMBER 2002
% 36 Own 41 36 37
48 Someone else’s 43 48 49
11 Both (VOL.) 9 8 8
4 Don’t know 4 8 7
2 Refused 2 -- --
[1,655] [1,356] [1,594] [1,017]
pewinternet.org 33
34. Q24 Apart from looking for information online, there are many different activities related to health
and medical issues a person might do on the internet. I’m going to read a list of online health-
related activities you may or may not have done. Just tell me if you happen to do each one, or
not. (First,/Next,) have you… *INSERT ITEM; RANDOMIZE; ALWAYS ASK e-f TOGETHER, IN
ORDER]?21
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Signed up to receive email updates or alerts
about health or medical issues22
Current internet users [N=2,065] 14 86 * *
Current online health seekers [N=1,655] 17 82 * *
Dec 2008 online health seekers [N=1,356] 19 81 * *
b. Read someone else's commentary or
experience about health or medical issues on
an online news group, website or blog
Current internet users 34 66 * *
Current online health seekers 41 58 * *
Dec 2008 online health seekers 41 59 0 *
c. Watched an online video about health or
medical issues
Current internet users 25 75 * *
Current online health seekers 31 69 * *
d. Gone online to find others who might have
health concerns similar to yours
Current internet users 18 82 0 *
Current online health seekers 23 77 0 *
e. Tracked your weight, diet or exercise routine
online
Current internet users 15 84 0 *
Current online health seekers 19 81 0 *
f. Tracked any other health indicators or
symptoms online
Current internet users 17 83 * *
Current online health seekers 21 79 * *
21
Current question was asked of all internet users [N=2,065]. December 2008 trend question wording was “There
are many different activities related to health and medical issues a person might do on the internet. I’m going to
read a list of things you may or may not have ever done online related to health and medical issues. Just tell me if
you happened to do each one, or not. Have you… *INSERT ITEM; ROTATE+?” Question was asked of online health
seekers [N=1,356].
22
December 2008 trend item wording was “Signed up to receive updates about health or medical issues”
pewinternet.org 34
35. Q25 We’re also interested in any health-related material you may have posted online. Have you
posted comments, questions or information about health or medical issues… *INSERT;
RANDOMIZE; ALWAYS ASK e LAST]?
Based on all internet users
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. In an online discussion, a listserv, or
other online group forum
Current [N=2,065] 5 95 0 *
Dec 2008 [N=1,650] 5 94 * *
b. On a blog
Current 4 96 * *
Dec 2008 4 96 * *
Item C: Based on SNS users
c. On a social networking site such as
Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn
Current [N=1,202] 11 89 0 *
Dec 2008 [N=459] 15 85 * 0
Item D: Based on Twitter users
d. On Twitter or another status update
site23
Current [N=433] 8 92 0 *
Dec 2008 [N=128] 11 89 0 0
e. On a website of any kind, such as a health
site or news site that allows comments
and discussion
Current 6 94 * *
Dec 2008 6 94 * *
23
December 2008 trend item wording was “On Twitter or other status updates”
pewinternet.org 35
36. Q26 Thinking specifically about what you have done on social networking sites like Facebook and
MySpace… Have you ever used these sites to… *INSERT ITEM; RANDOMIZE+? (Next,) have you
ever used a social networking site to…*INSERT ITEM+?24
Based on SNS users
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Get health information25
Current [N=1,202] 15 85 * *
Dec 2008 [N=459] 11 89 0 0
b. Start or join a health-related group26
Current 9 91 0 *
Dec 2008 6 94 0 0
c. Follow your friends’ personal health
experiences or health updates27
Current 23 77 0 *
Dec 2008 20 80 * 0
d. Raise money or draw attention to a
health-related issue or cause
Current 14 86 0 *
e. Remember or memorialize others who
suffered from a certain health condition
Current 17 82 * *
24
December 2008 trend question wording was “Thinking about what you have done on social networking sites like
Facebook and MySpace, have you… *INSERT ITEM; ROTATE+?”
25
December 2008 trend item wording was “Gotten any health information on the sites”
26
December 2008 trend item wording was “Started or joined a health-related group on a social networking site”
27
December 2008 trend item wording was “Followed your friends’ personal health experiences or updates on the
site”
pewinternet.org 36
37. [ROTATE Q27-Q28]
Q27 Have you or has anyone you know been HELPED by following medical advice or health
information found on the internet? [IF YES: Would you say the information provided MAJOR
help, MODERATE help or MINOR help?]
CURRENT DECEMBER 2008
% 6 Yes, major help 10
15 Yes, moderate help 20
9 Yes, minor help 11
65 No 50
4 Don’t know 8
* Refused 1
Q28 Have you or has anyone you know been HARMED by following medical advice or health
information found on the internet? [IF YES: Would you say the information caused SERIOUS
harm, MODERATE harm or MINOR harm?]
CURRENT DECEMBER 2008
% 1 Yes, serious harm 1
1 Yes, moderate harm 1
1 Yes, minor harm 1
95 No 94
2 Don’t know 3
* Refused *
pewinternet.org 37
38. Q29 Thinking again about health-related activities you may or may not do online, have you… *INSERT
ITEM; ROTATE]?28
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Consulted online rankings or reviews of
doctors or other providers29
Current internet users [N=2,065] 16 84 0 *
Current online health seekers [N=1,655] 19 81 0 *
Dec 2008 online health seekers [N=1,356] 24 76 * *
b. Consulted online rankings or reviews of
hospitals or other medical facilities30
Current internet users 15 85 0 *
Current online health seekers 18 82 0 *
Dec 2008 online health seekers 24 76 * 0
c. Consulted online reviews of particular drugs
or medical treatments
Current internet users 24 76 * *
Current online health seekers 30 70 * *
d. Posted a review online of a doctor
Current internet users 4 95 0 *
Current online health seekers 6 94 0 0
Dec 2008 online health seekers 5 95 0 0
e. Posted a review online of a hospital
Current internet users 3 97 0 *
Current online health seekers 4 96 0 0
Dec 2008 online health seekers 4 96 * 0
f. Posted your experiences with a particular
drug or medical treatment online
Current internet users 4 96 0 *
Current online health seekers 4 96 0 0
28
Current question was asked of all internet users *N=2,065+. December 2008 trend question wording was “There
are many different activities related to health and medical issues a person might do on the internet. I’m going to
read a list of things you may or may not have ever done online related to health and medical issues. Just tell me if
you happened to do each one, or not. Have you… *INSERT ITEM; ROTATE+?” Question was asked of online health
seekers [N=1,356].
29
December 2008 trend item wording was “Consulted rankings or reviews online of doctors or other providers”
30
December 2008 trend item wording was “Consulted rankings or reviews online of hospitals or other medical
facilities”
pewinternet.org 38
39. Q30 Thinking about the LAST time you had a health issue, did you get information, care or support
from… *INSERT; RANDOMIZE+? *IF YES AND INTERNET USER: Did you interact with them ONLINE
through the internet or email, OFFLINE by visiting them in person or talking on the phone, or
BOTH online and offline?]
YES, NO, NOT A DON’T
YES, ONLINE OFFLINE YES, BOTH SOURCE KNOW REFUSED
a. A doctor or other health care
professional 1 65 4 29 * *
b. Friends and family 1 41 12 44 1 *
c. Others who have the same health
condition 1 15 4 77 2 *
DOC Do you have a personal or family doctor, or other health care professional such as a nurse that
you usually rely on if you need medical care?
CURRENT
% 74 Yes
25 No
* Yes, more than one (VOL.)
* Don’t know
* Refused
HHS1 [IF HAVE MORE THAN ONE REGULAR DOCTOR, READ: Thinking about the doctor or health care
professional you get MOST of your medical care from…+ Has this person ever provided you with
personalized health information about a condition or health issue you were facing, or have they
not done this?
Based on those who have a regular doctor [N=2,272]
CURRENT
% 69 Yes, they did this
29 No, they did not
1 Don’t know
* Refused
pewinternet.org 39
40. Q31 [IF HAVE MORE THAN ONE REGULAR DOCTOR, READ: Still thinking about the doctor or health
care professional you get MOST of your medical care from…+ How helpful is your doctor in…
[INSERT; RANDOMIZE] – very helpful, somewhat helpful, or not helpful at all?
Based on those who have a regular doctor [N=2,272]
SOME- (VOL.) DOES DON’T
VERY WHAT NOT AT ALL NOT APPLY KNOW REFUSED
a. Giving you an accurate medical
diagnosis 78 18 2 1 1 *
b. Providing emotional support 57 26 9 5 1 1
c. Providing the medical or health
information you need 76 19 2 1 * 1
d. Finding effective treatment
strategies for you 72 20 3 3 1 1
e. Coordinating your overall health care 71 24 3 1 1 *
Q32 Overall, who do you think is more helpful when you need… *INSERT FIRST ITEM+ – health
professionals like doctors and nurses, OR other sources, such as fellow patients, friends and
family? And who is more helpful when you need… *INSERT NEXT ITEM; RANDOMIZE+? READ AS
NECESSARY: Professional sources like doctors and nurses, OR other sources, such as fellow
patients, friends and family?
PRO- OTHER (VOL.) BOTH
FESSIONALS SOURCES EQUALLY DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. An accurate medical diagnosis 91 5 2 2 *
b. Emotional support in dealing with a
health issue 30 59 5 4 2
c. Practical advice for coping with day-
to-day health situations 43 46 6 3 1
d. Information about alternative
treatments 63 24 5 6 1
e. Information about prescription drugs 85 9 3 3 1
f. A quick remedy for an everyday
health issue 41 51 4 3 1
g. A recommendation for a doctor or
specialist 62 27 6 4 1
h. A recommendation for a hospital or
other medical facility 62 27 6 4 1
pewinternet.org 40
41. MODEMA At home, do you connect to the internet through a dial-up telephone line, or do you have
some other type of connection, such as a DSL-enabled phone line, a cable TV modem, a
wireless connection, a fiber optic connection such as FIOS or a T-1?
Based on those who use the internet from home
TOTAL --------- ---------
HIGH --------- CABLE --------- FIBER ---------
DIAL-UP SPEED DSL MODEM WIRELESS OPTIC T-1 OTHER DK REF.
Current [N=1,947] 7 86 29 31 20 6 1 2 4 1
Q33 Thinking about your high-speed internet service at home, do you subscribe to a basic broadband
service, or do you pay extra for a premium service that promises faster speed?
Based on internet users who have high-speed internet at home
CURRENT
% 49 Subscribe to basic service
37 Subscribe to premium service at
higher price
13 Don’t know
2 Refused
[n=1,657]
A few last questions for statistical purposes only…
VET1 Have you ever served on active duty in the United States Armed Forces, either in the regular
military or in a National Guard or military reserve unit? Active duty does not include training for
the Reserves or National Guard, but DOES include activation, for example, for the Persian Gulf
War.
CURRENT
% 13 Yes
87 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
pewinternet.org 41
42. VET2 In the past 12 months, have you received some or all of your health care from a V-A hospital or
clinic?
Based on veterans [N=354]
CURRENT
% 14 Yes, all of my healthcare
9 Yes, some of my healthcare
77 No, no VA healthcare received
0 Don’t know
1 Refused
INS1 Now I would like to ask you about any health insurance you CURRENTLY have that helps pay for
the cost of health care. I’m going to read a list of a few types of health insurance, and I’d like you
to tell me which of these you have, if any. (First,) are you now PERSONALLY covered by [INSERT
IN ORDER]?
[IF RESPONDENT NOT SURE WHICH INSURANCE IS INCLUDED: Please think about insurance
plans that cover the costs of doctor and hospital bills IN GENERAL, and NOT those that cover
ONLY dental or eye care or the costs of caring for specific diseases.]
*IF RESPONDENTS TRY TO TELL TYPE THEY HAVE INSTEAD OF GOING THROUGH THE LIST: I’m
sorry but I have to ask about each type of insurance for the survey. Just tell me ‘no’ if you don’t
have this type.]
YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED
a. Private health insurance offered through an
employer or union? *IF “NO”: This could be
insurance through a current job, a former job,
your job or someone else’s job.+ 52 46 1 1
b. A private health insurance plan that you bought
yourself 18 81 * 1
c. Medicaid, [IF STATE CALIFORNIA: Medi-Cal], or
some other type of state medical assistance for
low-income people 15 84 1 *
d. Medicare, the government program that pays
health care bills for people over age 65 and for
some disabled people 21 78 1 *
Item E based on those who are not insured through
private health insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare
[N=513]
e. Health insurance through ANY other source,
including military or veteran’s coverage 10 87 1 2
pewinternet.org 42
43. INS2 Medicare is health insurance coverage most people receive when they turn 65 and are eligible
for Social Security. This includes different kinds of health plans offered THROUGH the Medicare
program — like the plans called H-M-Os. Are you now covered by Medicare or by ANY Medicare
plan?
Based on those age 65 and older who are not covered by Medicare [N=91]
CURRENT
% 42 Yes, covered
48 No, not covered
8 Don’t know
1 Refused
INS3 Does this mean you personally have NO health insurance now that would cover your doctor or
hospital bills?
Based on those who are not covered by any health insurance or are undesignated [N=446]
CURRENT
% 89 I do NOT have health insurance
8 I HAVE some kind of health insurance
1 Don’t know
2 Refused
DIS001 Thinking again about your own health… Do you have serious difficulty hearing?
CURRENT
% 9 Yes
90 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
DIS002 Are you blind or do you have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses?
CURRENT
% 7 Yes
93 No
* Don’t know
* Refused
pewinternet.org 43