Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it (r=413000 km)!
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagorean triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level. So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit. And by that the total (real) displacements will be less than 2.598 mkm and the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits than apogee.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it (r=413000 km)!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (2nd Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Moon Orbit Is Created In A Triangle Form
The hypothesis explanation
- The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques because the moon daily displacement =88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total distance will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference…. But
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- Based on that, if the moon uses its displacement as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only along month.
- The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), and will be shorter than 88000 km enables the moon to revolve around Earth through more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form. (The paper hypothesis)
- The using of Pythagorean triangle is a proved fact otherwise the moon apogee radius should be (r=0.413 mkm) in place of (r=0.406 mkm).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (3)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it (r=413000 km)!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (2nd Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Moon Orbit Is Created In A Triangle Form
The hypothesis explanation
- The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques because the moon daily displacement =88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total distance will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference…. But
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- Based on that, if the moon uses its displacement as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only along month.
- The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), and will be shorter than 88000 km enables the moon to revolve around Earth through more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form. (The paper hypothesis)
- The using of Pythagorean triangle is a proved fact otherwise the moon apogee radius should be (r=0.413 mkm) in place of (r=0.406 mkm).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (3)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motion (part no.3)Gerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Part No. 3)
Abstract
Paper Argument:
- There are 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion study and analysis, where these 3 tools can help to figure the moon motion trajectory and define the moon position in its orbit, these 3 tools are
1. The concept (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
2. The equation which can define the moon position in its orbit, where this equation depends on the previous concept.
3. The Moon Orbital Triangle which is created as a result of the moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique as one of the moon motion techniques
Paper objective:
- The paper summarizes the advantages of these 3 tools and how they can help to define the moon position in its orbit as near s possible.
- Also
- The paper provides the basic difficulties to figure the moon motion trajectory and the solutions which are provided by the 3 new discovered tools.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions using of different rates of time provides a basic progress in the solar system motion understanding, because
- The solar planets no longer be considered as rigid bodies move by the sun mass gravity effect, Instead
- The solar planets be similar to waterwheels built on one canal, they all rotate by the water motion.
- The matter is created out of light, but the born matter isn't separated from its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time.
- Based on this vision.
- The solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam, and the planets move one unified general motion in parallel to its parent light beam.
- This theory is proved
- The planets motions different rates of time prove that the planets move one unified general motion.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the planets motions using of different rates of time. And use the theory to explains how the motions data of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn be created.
- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time Is A Feature Resulting By Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
- Because of that,
- The Planets Motions Different Rates Of Time Theory Depends On The Solar System Creation Theory.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The moon orbital motion geometry (revised) (2)Gerges francis
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (2)
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motion (part no.3)...Gerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Part No.3) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument:
- There are 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion study and analysis, where these 3 tools can help to figure the moon motion trajectory and define the moon position in its orbit, these 3 tools are
1. The concept (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
2. The equation (theta= theta + 1.7 degrees) which can define the moon position in its orbit, where this equation depends on the previous concept.
3. The Moon Orbital Triangle which is created as a result of the moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique as one of the moon motion techniques
Paper objective:
- The paper summarizes the advantages of these 3 tools and how they can help to define the moon position in its orbit as near s possible.
- Also
- The paper provides the basic difficulties to figure the moon motion trajectory and the solutions which are provided by the 3 new discovered tools.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation and Motion. The Sun Can't Be The Solar Planets Motions Reason.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By The Fact That (The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece).
- Newton had told us (The Solar Planets Motions Reason Is The Sun Mass Gravity). This Idea Newton had created out of imagination. But
- This idea be considered as a fact during 400 years! No doubt be raised against it, and no one suggested that (The Idea Is Wrong In Its Principle)
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity will cause serious problem for the physics book. Specifically because of The General Theory of Relativity which is created to explain how the sun mass gravity can cause a solar planet motion.
- The fact is powerful than any imaginary idea.
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation.
- This fact forces to modify basic theories in the physics book (Mechanics Branch). Clearly we have to correct our theories according to the facts if these facts be proved.
Paper Objective
- The Paper provides 3 basic proves against Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. Which Are:
(1) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
(2) The Solar Planets Move Types Of Motions Can't Be Provided By The Sun Mass Gravity If Found.
(3) The Sun Rays Velocity (Light known velocity 0.3 mkm/s) proves that, The Sun Is Created after The Solar Planets Creation and Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The solar group is created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar planets matters and their distances are created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light velocity 1.16 mkm/s can be proved by The planets orbital and internal distances analysis where the distances are created and distributed based on a geometrical design depends on a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity, because
- The sun light velocity (0.3 mkm/s) proves that, this light be produced as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/).
Paper conclusion
- The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion. which disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity Decisively.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques
-The moon displacement = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference.
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- According to this data, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only during a month.
- The moon solves this dilemma by creating an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), where (L) will be less than 88000 km and the moon can revolve around Earth through more orbits than its apogee orbit
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why The Moon Orbital Circumference At Apogee Orbit = 2.55 Mkm?
The Question Explanation
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
Paper answer
- The moon uses a geometrical interaction depends on the difference between these 2 distances (2.55 mkm &2.598 mkm) to create the moon orbital inclination5.1 deg.
Paper hypotheses
(1st) There's a 2nd force effects on the moon motion in addition to Earth gravity
(2nd) Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion and cause Metonic Cycle
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motion (part no.3)Gerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Part No. 3)
Abstract
Paper Argument:
- There are 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion study and analysis, where these 3 tools can help to figure the moon motion trajectory and define the moon position in its orbit, these 3 tools are
1. The concept (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
2. The equation which can define the moon position in its orbit, where this equation depends on the previous concept.
3. The Moon Orbital Triangle which is created as a result of the moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique as one of the moon motion techniques
Paper objective:
- The paper summarizes the advantages of these 3 tools and how they can help to define the moon position in its orbit as near s possible.
- Also
- The paper provides the basic difficulties to figure the moon motion trajectory and the solutions which are provided by the 3 new discovered tools.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions using of different rates of time provides a basic progress in the solar system motion understanding, because
- The solar planets no longer be considered as rigid bodies move by the sun mass gravity effect, Instead
- The solar planets be similar to waterwheels built on one canal, they all rotate by the water motion.
- The matter is created out of light, but the born matter isn't separated from its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time.
- Based on this vision.
- The solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam, and the planets move one unified general motion in parallel to its parent light beam.
- This theory is proved
- The planets motions different rates of time prove that the planets move one unified general motion.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the planets motions using of different rates of time. And use the theory to explains how the motions data of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn be created.
- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time Is A Feature Resulting By Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
- Because of that,
- The Planets Motions Different Rates Of Time Theory Depends On The Solar System Creation Theory.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The moon orbital motion geometry (revised) (2)Gerges francis
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (2)
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Paper Conclusions
(1st)
Earth Cycle 1461 days is created as a result of the moon orbit regression
(2nd)
Uranus Motion effect on the moon orbital motion and causes to create Metonic Cycle.
(3rd)
A 2nd force effect on the moon orbital motion.
Paper Question
How can the far planets effect on the moon orbital motion spite of the huge distance?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motion (part no.3)...Gerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Part No.3) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument:
- There are 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion study and analysis, where these 3 tools can help to figure the moon motion trajectory and define the moon position in its orbit, these 3 tools are
1. The concept (the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion)
2. The equation (theta= theta + 1.7 degrees) which can define the moon position in its orbit, where this equation depends on the previous concept.
3. The Moon Orbital Triangle which is created as a result of the moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique as one of the moon motion techniques
Paper objective:
- The paper summarizes the advantages of these 3 tools and how they can help to define the moon position in its orbit as near s possible.
- Also
- The paper provides the basic difficulties to figure the moon motion trajectory and the solutions which are provided by the 3 new discovered tools.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation and Motion. The Sun Can't Be The Solar Planets Motions Reason.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By The Fact That (The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece).
- Newton had told us (The Solar Planets Motions Reason Is The Sun Mass Gravity). This Idea Newton had created out of imagination. But
- This idea be considered as a fact during 400 years! No doubt be raised against it, and no one suggested that (The Idea Is Wrong In Its Principle)
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity will cause serious problem for the physics book. Specifically because of The General Theory of Relativity which is created to explain how the sun mass gravity can cause a solar planet motion.
- The fact is powerful than any imaginary idea.
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation.
- This fact forces to modify basic theories in the physics book (Mechanics Branch). Clearly we have to correct our theories according to the facts if these facts be proved.
Paper Objective
- The Paper provides 3 basic proves against Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. Which Are:
(1) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
(2) The Solar Planets Move Types Of Motions Can't Be Provided By The Sun Mass Gravity If Found.
(3) The Sun Rays Velocity (Light known velocity 0.3 mkm/s) proves that, The Sun Is Created after The Solar Planets Creation and Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The solar group is created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar planets matters and their distances are created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light velocity 1.16 mkm/s can be proved by The planets orbital and internal distances analysis where the distances are created and distributed based on a geometrical design depends on a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity, because
- The sun light velocity (0.3 mkm/s) proves that, this light be produced as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/).
Paper conclusion
- The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion. which disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity Decisively.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The moon uses Pythagorean triangle as one of its motion techniques
-The moon displacement = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference.
- (2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km) (the moon apogee radius =0.406 mkm) (1%)
- According to this data, the moon would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only during a month.
- The moon solves this dilemma by creating an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that, the real displacement through the orbit be (L =88000 km cos (θ)), where (L) will be less than 88000 km and the moon can revolve around Earth through more orbits than its apogee orbit
- The moon using of Pythagorean triangle technique creates the moon orbit in a triangle form.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why The Moon Orbital Circumference At Apogee Orbit = 2.55 Mkm?
The Question Explanation
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
Paper answer
- The moon uses a geometrical interaction depends on the difference between these 2 distances (2.55 mkm &2.598 mkm) to create the moon orbital inclination5.1 deg.
Paper hypotheses
(1st) There's a 2nd force effects on the moon motion in addition to Earth gravity
(2nd) Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion and cause Metonic Cycle
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Creation And Motion (Question And Answers) (Part 1).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Creation And Motion (Question And Answers) (Part 1)
Abstract
A Question No. 1
Is There A Simple Proof For Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion?
A Question No. 2
Can The Planets Velocities Be Distributed Based On A Geometrical Design?
A Question No. 3
Is There A Simple Proof For The Solar System Distances Creation In A Network Form?
A Question No. 4
What Proves Are Available For The Existence of The Light Supposed Velocity (1.16mkm/sec)
A Question No. 5
How does Planet velocity be defined? Is There an Equation can be used for all planets velocities?
A Question No. 6
(Planets Velocities Are Created Complementary To One Another)
How to prove this statement?
A Question No. 7
Can Jupiter and Uranus Velocities Be Defined Based On One Another?
A Question No.8
What Basic Points Be Provided By The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius Analysis.pdfGerges francis
The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis no. (1)
- The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design
Paper hypothesis no. (2)
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam
- This Light Beam Travels With A Velocity 1.16 Million Km Per Second
Paper hypothesis no. (3)
- The moon Metonic Cycle be created by an effect of Uranus motion on the moon motion which necessitates to decrease the moon orbital apogee radius from 413600 km to 406000 km.
Paper hypotheses Explanation
- The paper provides a new vision tells that (The Solar System Be Built Based On One Geometrical Design)
- The design can be in any form as a cube or triangle ……etc
- Means,
- The solar planets and their distances integrate their motions into one design.
- Let's ask
- What does prove this vision? (question no. 1)
- What's the result of this design? (question no. 2)
- How this one design be created? (question no. 3)
- (1st Question)
- The solar system one design be proved by my 3 equations which are
- (1st Equation)
- d2= 4d0 (d- d0) where (d =planet orbital distance) and (d0 = previous planet orb. dis.)
- this equation uses the planets order because each planet orbital distance depends directly on its previous neighbor
- The equation tells, the distance from the sun to Pluto be distributed geometrically in order regardless the planets data – neither their masses nor their diameters –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By 2 Facts Which Are:
- (1st Fact) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
- (2nd Fact) The Solar Planets Move A Type Of Motion Different Completely From The Planet Motion Be Described By Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Paper Proves
- The (2nd Fact) is proved by The Solar Planets Motions Analysis.
- While Newton had supposed that, Each planet moves independently from the other planets. The fact is that, the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. by that, The Planets Motions Be similar to The Train Carriages Motion. or similar to A Machine Of Gears Motion.
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis disproves the Motion Independency Concept, showing that, the planets motions be different completely from Newton Motion Description.
- The (1st Fact) which is (The Sun is Created after all Planets Creation and Motion). This Fact disproves Newton Theory decisively. This fact proves are discussed in this paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The SpaceGerges francis
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Be Created By A Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 mkm.Sec (Revise...Gerges francis
The Solar System Be Created By A Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 mkm/Sec (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System is created out of One light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The matter is created out of light beam, and the produced matter moves with its parent light beam by using different rates of time.
- The Solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam its velocity be 1.16 million per second.
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) is registered in the planets creation and motions data.
The Solar System Description
- Light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) travels a distance = The Planet Orbital Circumference in a period (T seconds)
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s) travels during this period (Ts) a distance = D
- The same planet moves a distance d in a period (=P hours) where
- D = 2π d (Proved by the planets motions data)
- P days = The Same Planet Orbital Period
- And
- The rate between the time (Ts) and this planet orbital period P (in seconds units) be used to define this same planet velocity-
- Where
- (P/ Ts) = (1.16 mkm /V)
- V = the Same Planet Velocity during a solar day
- Shortly
- The planet moves on a circle radius in a period (=P hours) while the light (0.3 mkm/s) travels a distance = This same circle circumference in (Ts).
- The rate between (P and T) periods be used to define this same planet velocity in a solar day, by that both motions be accompanying.
- Where
- The period (Ts) be defined by light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) passing this same planet orbital circumference.
- As a result the planet motion depends on the 2 light beams motions and the planet motion data analysis proves both light velocities are facts
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the solar planets motions data to prove that their motions depend on Light beam Motion and a light beam its velocity be 1.16 mkm/sec is found and effective on the solar system motion.
- Notice
- This revised version of the paper adds only 4 points of discussion which are (4-4, 4-5, 4-6, 4-7) (from Page No. 48 to Page No. 59) – nothing else is changed
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Why Jupiter diameter =142984 km?
We have asked this question before … so why we need a new paper concerning this same question?!
I would write some theory in consistency with the physics book, But I can't!
While the big bang theory tells that the solar planets are created based random actions and events, I provide data proving that, no planet data can be created by any random process, on the contrary, planet data is created depending on each other and complementary to one another.
While the solar system current description tells that, each planet is a separated planet found independent from the other planets data. I provide crucial proves that the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building, and each planet data is created based on the other planets data – as in any creature body its leg data should be proportional to its hand data
While the current theory tells that, the sun is a star produces the sun rays based on nuclear interactions, I prove that, the sun is a mirror and the sun rays energy is produced by planets motion energies total. where Earth motion concentrates the planets motions energies total and produce the rays which is reflected to us as the sun rays…
While the current theory tells that, the matter data is created independently from any factors, I prove that, the matter dimensions are created in proportionality with space dimensions, both are created by light motion.
While the current theory tells us that, Jupiter is a common planet similar to many others, I prove that, Jupiter energy is the origin by which the solar planets are created
While the physics book tells that, the sun is created independently from the planets data, I prove that, The Sun Is Created Depending On Jupiter And Earth Specifically…
The question is, from where I brought these strange ideas?! From the planets data… i.e. I brought these ideas from the Truth.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
-The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design
(As a result the planets data can be concluded theoretically without observation)
The hypothesis proves
Equation No. (1)
d2 = 4d0 (d-d0)
d = the planet orbital distance
d0 = The direct previous neighbor planet orbital distance
(Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus – Pluto depends on Uranus )
Equation No. (2)
(d1/d2) = (v2¬/v1)2
d1= Planet Orbital Distance (its velocity v1)
d2= Another Planet Orbital Distance (Not Neighbor) (its velocity v2)
Equation No. (3)
(v1/ v2) = s/r
r = Planet Diameter
s = The Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
The Proves Explanation
- Let's summarize the idea in following
- By Equation no. (1) we can conclude all planets orbital distances by using Mercury orbital distance (57.9 mkm) – if we know this data only – we can conclude by Equation no. (1) all planets orbital distances – means planet orbital distance depends n its neighbor orbital distance
- Equation no. (2) gives a extension for our knowledge – because – by Equation no. (2) we can conclude all planets velocities rates – that can help to define the planets orbital periods –
- We notice that, Equation no. (1) depends on planets order – but equation no. (2) doesn't depend on the planets order.
- Equation no. (3) can define planets diameters and rotation periods based on their velocities rate.
- Why do we need these equations?
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm) we can conclude theoretically (1) All Planets Orbital Distances (2) All Planets Velocities Rates and their orbital periods and (3) All Planets Diameters And Rotation Periods
- Why do we need that?
- Because the solar group data proves another vision for it – the planets aren't rigid bodies separated from one another – on the contrary- the planets be similar to parts in one geometrical design or members in one creature body – in more accurate – the planets be similar to stories in one building - they are created based on one another – as you see a child and discovers that its face is similar to its parent – or its eyes are similar to its mother – the persons are separated from one another but the data shows that they are created based on each other –when you look at them and decide they are separated persons – that means you are wrong – Newton is Mistaken –
- Based on this vision, the solar system motion must depend on One Geometrical Design,
- means
- The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages move together. Or similar to ships sail over a sea move by this sea waves
- Also the solar group can be similar to 9 waterwheels be built on one canal and this canal water causes to rotate the 9 waterwheels. (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Moon Orbit Design
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –31st
January 2021
Abstract
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day
Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon
orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from
Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve
around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it
(r=413000 km)!
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagorean triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000
km) and its orbit horizontal level. So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ))
by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit. And by that the total
(real) displacements will be less than 2.598 mkm and the moon can revolve around
Earth through more near orbits than apogee.
- This technique solves the moon motion dilemma and the paper tries to answer the
question (Why the moon apogee orbital circumference doesn't =2.598 mkm)?
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Contents
Subject Page N
1- Introduction 3
2- The Moon Orbital Triangle Description
2-1 Preface
2-2 The Moon Orbital Triangle Description
2-3 The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Analysis
5
3- The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-1 Why Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
3-2 How Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-4 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
26
4-1 Preface
4-2 The Necessity Of Pythagorean Triangle (1, 2, 51/2)
4-3 Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?
4-4 The moon motion angle (12.195 deg) Analysis
4-5 Why The Moon Displacement Daily =88000 km?
4-6 The angle 71.9 degrees
4-7 Why The Moon Day Period =29.53 days?
4-8 The Perpendicular Line BC (=86000 km)
42
5- The Moon Orbital Triangle Benefits
5-1 Preface
5-2 The Moon orbital triangle shows that (2nd
force effect on the moon motion)
5-3 The Moon orbital triangle shows that (There's 2nd
Orbit for the moon motion)
5-4 The Moon orbital triangle shows that Uranus effects on the moon motion
75
6- Metonic Cycle Is A Proof of Uranus Effect On The Moon Motion
6-1 Preface
6-2 Uranus Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion
6-3 Uranus, The Moon And Pluto Motions Interaction
6-4 The Moon Orbital Triangle Angles Discussions
6-5 Moon Day Period Analysis (29.53 Solar Days)
80
7- Uranus Motion Analysis
7-1 Uranus Motion During 1440 Of Its Days Period
7-2 Uranus Motion During 8 Pluto Days period
7-3 Uranus 144 Days Cycle
101
8- Appendix No.1 122
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
1- Introduction
- The paper discusses 3 new discovered tools can be used in the moon orbital motion
study and analysis which are
o The concept of Pythagorean rule using by the moon orbital motion
o The moon orbital motion equation
o The moon orbital triangle.
- The moon has to use Pythagorean triangle technique in its orbital motion to be able
to revolve around Earth in more near orbits than apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm).
- By the moon using of Pythagorean technique, the moon orbital motion almost be
controlled by the angle (θ) where (L=88000 km cos (θ)), and this angle defines the
moon daily real displacement and the distance from the moon to the apogee or
perigee point (it defines its position as a ship between 2 river banks)
- Because of that, the moon orbital motion equation depends on the angle (θ), where
the equation is … (θ1 = θ0+ 1.7 degrees) , θ0= the triangle angle before motion and
θ1 the triangle angle after where 1.7 degrees is used to express the moon daily
motion. this equation we should use and test in Point no. (3).
- The moon orbital motion equation depends on the concept which supposes that ,
the moon uses Pythagorean triangle technique in its orbital motion.
- In the point no. (2) the paper introduces the moon orbital triangle basic data and in
the point no. (4) the paper analyzes the moon orbital triangle geometrical design.
- The moon motion 4 basic points were the way to discover the moon using of
Pythagorean triangle where these 4 points are
o Perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm), the most near point the moon can reach to
Earth.
o Apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm), the most far point the moon can reach from
Earth
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
o Total Solar Eclipse radius (r= 0.373 mkm), the moon creates A total solar
eclipse when the moon be at this distance from Earth or Shorter.
o The Moon Orbital distance (r=0.384 mkm), this value is the registered one
in the moon data sheet as the moon orbital distance.
- These 4 points are defined based on each other by Pythagorean rule:
o (363000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (373000 km)2
o (373000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (384000 km)2
o (384000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (393000 km)2
o (393000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (406000 km)2
(Error 1%)
- Based on this data, the concept is discovered that, The Moon Uses Pythagorean
Triangle As One Of The Moon Motion Techniques
- But 2 questions are raised with this concept
o (1st
question) Why does the moon use Pythagorean triangle? The answer is
in the Point No. (3)
o (2nd
question) What's this dimension (86000 km) which is used frequently in
the previous data? The answer is in the Points No. (2 and 4)
- Let's discuss these tools in following in addition to discover how the moon uses
Pythagorean triangle and what benefits the moon receives for this using…
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
2- The Moon Orbital Triangle Description
2-1 Preface
2-2 The Moon Orbital Triangle Description
2-3 The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Analysis
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
2-1 Preface
- The moon orbital triangle is created by its base (EA) creation between the Earth
Ecliptic & the moon equator lines, where there's an angle 1.543 degrees is found
between these 2 lines, the triangle base (EA) is created between these 2 lines,
above it the ecliptic with and angle 0.443deg and under it the equator with 1.1 deg.
- Then the perpendicular line BC is created perpendicular on the base (EA)
- The perpendicular line (BC) is created above the moon position, and because the
moon moves from perigee to apogee, this line BC should be used 2 times one on
the Perigee Point and one on the apogee point.
- By that we have 2 forms of the moon orbital triangle, we should discuss them as 2
cases for the same triangle, these 2 cases will be discussed individually.
- The 2 cases are inserted here for reference.
1st
Case
2nd
Case
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
2-2 The Moon Orbital Triangle Description
2-2-1 The 1st
Case (The Perigee Point).
- This is the suggested moon orbital triangle for the 1st
case
- In following we discuss how this triangle is created
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
The Moon Orbital Triangle Building
(1st
Point) The Earth Position (Point E)
- The Point (T) refers to The Earth Center
- The Point (M1) refers to The Moon Center (The moon in Perigee Point).
- The Points (T, Q and Y) are on the Ecliptic Line
- The Red Line (TM) is the moon orbit plane with an inclination 5.1 degrees on the
Earth ecliptic line.
- The Green Line (BE) is the moon triangle base, the distance BE = 363000 km, I
choose it and accordingly I have to define the point (E) position.
- The line BC is a perpendicular on the triangle base (BE), its length =86000 km
- The line BC is perpendicular on the triangle base (BE) on the moon perigee point.
(The 1st
Case)
- The angle CBE =90 degrees but the angle CYT = 89.557 degrees.
- The points (Q and P) are the intersection points of CE with the ecliptic and the
moon orbit plane respectively.
- The line TX is a perpendicular from the Earth Center on the base BE
- K is the intersection point between the triangle base (BE) & the moon orbit plane.
- The angle is Zero between the points ( A, B , K , X and E).
- The line EC connects between the points C & E where BC =86000 km and BE =
363000 km (As The Triangle Creation Requirements).
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
(2nd
Point) The Moon Motion (From Perigee To Apogee)
- The moon moves on its orbit planet (MT) with an inclination 5.1 degrees on the
ecliptic, from Perigee (M1) (r=363000 km) to Apogee (M2) (r=406000 km).
- The distance M1 M2 = 43000 km (=The Perigee Apogee Distance)
- The line M1B is perpendicular on the triangle Base (EA) on The perigee point.
Notice
- M1B and M2D are perpendicular on the moon orbital triangle base (EA) (the
Green Line) …… BUT
- M1B and M2D are perpendicular on the triangle Base EA on (x-y plain) but the
line BC is perpendicular on the base (EA) on the (z-axis)
- Based on that
- The distance BD is parallel to M1R, and the moon motion from perigee to apogee
(M1M21) can be expressed on the triangle base by the distance (BD) where the
distance (M1M2) =43000 km and the distance BD =42800 km (error 0.4%)
- The blue line is the moon equator line, where the triangle Base (EA) has 1.1
degrees above the moon equator and has 0.443 degrees under the ecliptic.
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
- Let's define the Earth Point in following:
(1) In the Triangle ATK
o The angle ATK = 5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination)
o The angle TAK =0.443deg (an angle between the base and ecliptic)
o The angle AKT = 174.457 degrees
o The angle BKM1 = 5.543 degrees
(2) In the Triangle M1BK
o The angle M1KB = 5.543 degrees
o The angle KM1B = 84.457 degrees
o The angle RM1M2 = 5.543 degrees
o The distance M1B = 31604 km
o The distance M1K = 327188 km
o The distance BK = 325658 km
o The distance KT = 35812 km
o The distance BX = 361300 km
(3) In the Triangle RM1M2
o The angle M2M1R = 5.543 degrees
o The angle RM2M1 = 84.457 degrees
o The angle M1M2N = 6.643 degrees
o The distance M2R = 4153 km
o The distance M1R = 42800 km
(4) In the Triangle KTX
o The angle XKT = 5.543 degrees
o The distance KT = 35812 km
o The distance TX = 3460 km
o The distance KX = 35644 km
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
(5) In the Triangle TM1Y
o The angle TM1Y = 84.457 degrees
o The angle TYM1 = 90.443 degrees
o The angle M1TY =5.1 degrees
o The distance TM1 = 363000 km
o The distance YT = 361313 km
o The distance M1Y = 32269.5 km
o The distance YB = 665 km
o The distance M1B = 31604 km
(6) In the Triangle KTE
o The angle E = 63.87 degrees
o The angle ETK = 110.6 degrees
o The angle ETQ = 115.7 degrees
o The distance TX = 3460 km
o The distance TE = 3854 km
o The distance XE = 1700 km (to make the distance BE =363000 km)
o The distance KT = 35812 km
o The distance KE = 37344 km (= 35644+1700)
(7) In the Triangle EPK
o The angle EPK = 161.1 degrees
o The angle EKP = 5.543 degrees
o The angle PEK = 13.328 degrees
o The distance PK = 26604 km
o The distance PE = 11147 km
(8) In the Triangle EPT
o The angle TEP = 50.54 degrees
o The angle ETP = 110.57 degrees (84.457+26.12)
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
o The angle EPT = 18.89 degrees
o The distance TP = 9190 km
(9) In the Triangle QTP
o The angle TPQ = 161.1 degrees
o The angle T = 115.72 degrees
o The angle PTQ = 5.1 degrees
o The angle TQP = 13.78 degrees
o The distance TQ = 12491 km
o The distance QP = 2529 km
o The distance EQ = 13673 km = 11144 + 2529
Data Analysis
(1)
o The Triangle TXE
o The distance TX = 3460 km The distance XE =1700 km
o The moon diameter =3475 km and the moon radius =1737.5 km, both are
equal the triangle 2 dimensions (error around 2%). That shows geometrical
interaction in this distances definition.
(2)
o The Point (E) is found inside the Earth but a far from its center with 3854
km with an angle 63.8 degrees where its level is far from the Earth center
with a perpendicular distance =1700 km.
(3)
o The line M1B has an angle 90 degrees (M1BK) but the angle M1YT
=90.443 degrees.
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
(3rd
Point) The Point (A)
- The Point (A) is a point on the Ecliptic Line I have choose and caused to create it
with an angle =0.443 degrees under the ecliptic line. By that the triangle base (AB)
be found under the Ecliptic with 0.443 degrees and above the moon equator line
(the blue line) with 1.1 degrees.
- That means, the triangle base (AB) depends on the Earth ecliptic line.
- The triangle ABC is a closed triangle where the point (A) is the intersection point
between the ecliptic line, the triangle base AB and the triangle dimension AC
- I choose the distance AB =86000 km. (in the 1st
Case)
- The line BC is a perpendicular on the point B, (which is parallel to the perigee
point M1 with a radius r=363000 km). (1st
Case)
- The line BC length =86000 km (I choose it).
Notice
- The moon equator line (the blue line) doesn't interest neither with the ecliptic nor
the moon orbital triangle AB on the point (A),
- The moon equator line (the blue line) will interest the ecliptic line beyond the
point (A) with a long distance
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
- Let's define this intersection point position in following:
o The moon orbit plane declines on the Ecliptic line with 5.1 degrees, means,
far distance be found between the Earth and moon will cause longer
perpendicular distance between the moon center and the ecliptic line
o For that, we use the moon distance on a apogee because it's the most far
point the moon can reach from Earth
o ON APOGEE …
o Earth moon distance on apogee point = 406000 km
o The perpendicular distance from the moon center to the ecliptic line = 36091
km, because of the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
o But
o The angle between the ecliptic line and the moon equator line =1.543 deg
o So these 2 lines will be intersected each other at a distance =1340318 km
o i.e.
o The ecliptic line will intersect with the moon equator line after the apogee
point with a distance =1340318 km
o but the distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km
o i.e. The ecliptic line will intersect with the moon equator line after the
perigee point with a distance =1383318 km
o Notice, the lunar eclipse umbra length =1392000 km (error 0.6%)
The Useful Result :
The triangle base (AE) has an angle = 1.1 degrees with the moon equator line.
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
(4th
Point) The Line BC
- The line BC is perpendicular on the triangle base on the point (B), so, the angle
ABC =90 degrees. The blue line is the moon equator line and the red line is the
moon orbit plane – the green line is the triangle Base (BA).
- Based on that,
o The angle BYA =89.557 degrees
o The angle CYA =90.443 degrees
o The angle M1NV =91.1 degrees
o The angle M2NM1 =88.9 degrees
o The angle M1NM2 =6.643 degrees
o The angle between the blue line (the moon equator) and the green line
(the triangle Base BA) = 1.1 degrees
o The distance BC = 86000 km (I have choose it)
o The distance AB = 86000 km (I have choose it)
o The distance AY = 86009 km
o The distance YB = 665 km
o The distance MB = 31604 km
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
2-2-2 The 2nd
Case (The Apogee Point).
- The Change Is In The Following:
- The line BC is perpendicular on the triangle Base (AE) on the point (D) which is
parallel to the point (Apogee) of the moon motion. (apogee r =406000 km).
- The 2nd
Case causes no more changes in the moon orbital triangle. The only
change is that, the perpendicular line position is changed from perigee point (in the
1st
Case) to the apogee point (in this 2nd
Case).
- In following w should discuss the changed data in the triangle as a result to change
the line BC position.
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
(Point No. I) The Triangle ABC
Under the Ecliptic
- The angle CDA = the angle EDB =90 degrees
- The angle DCA = the angle DCB =26.46 degrees
- The angle ACB = the angle DCB =52.92 degrees
- The angle CAD = the angle CBD =63.54 degrees
- The line CD = 86000 km
- AD = DB = 43000 km (equal to M1R =42800 km error 0.4%).
- AC =AB = 96151 km
- The distance EA =449197 km
The Ecliptic
- The angle ydC = 89.557 degrees
- The angle DAd =0.443 degrees
- The distance Dd =333 km
- The distance BY =665 km
- The distance By =740 km
- The distance Cy =95411 km
- The distance dy =42664 km
- The distance Ay = 85350 km
- The perimeter of the triangle ACB = 278302 km
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
(Point No. II) The Triangle CBX
Under the Ecliptic
- The distance DX = BX 361300 km + BD 43000 km =404300 km
- The distance AX = DX 404300 km + AD 43000 km =447300 km
- The line BC = 86000 km
- The hypotenuse CX = 413345 km
- The angle CXB = 12 degrees
- The angle BCX = 51.44 degrees
- The angle CBE =116.46 degrees
The Ecliptic
- The distance AT = 447313 km
- The distance yT = 361963 km
- The distance Tq = 12491 km
- The distance yq = 349472 km
- The distance Td = 404630 km
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
2-3 The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Analysis (1st
Case)
- This figure of 2 circles I have brought from internet to use in the Explanation -
- We have supposed, the inner circle is the Perigee orbit and the outer circle is the
apogee orbit, And we have calculated the tangent DB = 181843 km
- AB = 363686 km (= Perigee Radius Approximately)
- Perigee radius r =0.363 mkm
- Apogee radius r =0.406 mkm
- Based on that,
- The triangle (ODB) angles are 26.564 deg. and 63.435 deg.
But
- The triangle (BCD) in the moon orbital triangle is a similar to this triangle (ODB)
where their dimensions are rated and their angles are equal, both are created as a
specific Pythagorean triangle (1, 2 and 51/2
)
- In the triangle data analysis we should answer the question (What's the
geometrical necessity for which the specific Pythagorean triangle (1, 2 and
51/2
) is used for the moon orbital motion?)
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
The Triangle BCD
- Please remember, the green line (the triangle base EA) has a n angle 1.1 degrees
with the moon equator line, and an angle 0.443 degrees with the Earth Ecliptic
- The triangle (BCD) should be the basic triangle in the moon orbit, because
1. The distance BD refers to the moon motion distance from perigee to apogee.
That tells this triangle expresses the basic part of the moon orbital motion.
2. The triangle (BCD) is similar to the triangle (ODB) and both are specific
type of Pythagorean triangle (1,2, 51/2
)
Data
- The angle (BCD) = 26.46 degrees, the angle (CDB)= 63.54 degrees
- The hypotenuse CD = 96151 km the distance AC = 121622 km
- The distance BD = 85600km (85600 km) where AD=BD =42800 km
Data Analysis
o The perimeter of triangle (BCD) = 225151 km
o Sin (5.1) x 225000 km x 2 = 40000 km (Earth Circumference)
o (5.1 degrees = The Moon Orbital Inclination).
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
The Triangle BCZ
- The triangle BCZ is a specific triangle in the moon orbit because
o BZ = 18586 km
o The Angle BCZ =12.195 degrees
o The hypotenuse CZ = 88000 km = the moon displacement daily
- The data is interesting because it tells that, there's some relationship between the
moon daily displacement (88000 km) and the angle (BCZ =12.195 degrees)
- The angle 12.195 degrees = 13.177 degrees – 0.9856262 degrees
- Where
o 13.177 degrees = The Moon Motion Degrees Daily
o 0.98562 degrees= Earth Moon Motion Degrees Daily
o Because of that
o 12.195 degrees x 29.53 days (the moon day period ) = 360 degrees
o Can we conclude that, the moon daily displacement is defined relative to
this angle (12.195 degrees)? We should discuss this question later.
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
The Point (A)
- The moon orbital triangle geometrical structure depends on 3 points (E, C and A),
- The Point (E) (found inside Earth)
- The point (C) (found on z-axis)
- But
- What's the point (A)? how this point can be created and effect on the moon orbital
motion and triangle?! Because this point is far from apogee radius with 43000 km
and the moon can't move beyond the apogee radius, means, this point (A) is found
in space and should have no effect on the moon orbital motion! so to find this point
(A) in the moon orbital triangle geometrical structure that creates a question needs
to be solved!
- But geometrically the point (A) is one pillar of the moon orbital triangle pillars,
means, the geometrical structure forces us to accept the massive importance of the
point (A) where no clear reason we have to explain why this point has such
massive importance?!
- The paper answers this question by the hypothesis: (Another force effects on the
moon orbital motion in addition to Earth gravity force and this point (A) refers to
this 2nd
force) –
- The paper tries to prove its hypotheses.
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Analysis (2nd
Case)
Data Analysis
- The Triangle ACB
- The perimeter of the triangle ACB = 278302 km = π x 88600 km (error 0.6%)
Accurately
o 88000 x π =86000 km +2 x 95230 km
o The hypotenuse AC = AB =96151 km
o 1% accurately the difference between 95230 km and 96151 km
o The data tells that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) must be defined
depending on this triangle ABC (Data).
- The Triangle TdM2
- The distance T M2 = 406000 km (the apogee radius)
- The distance M2 d = 36092 km
- The distance T d = 404630 km
- The angle dTM2 = 5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination)
- The angle TM2d = 84.457 degrees
- The angle M2dT = 90.443 degrees
- (Please remember 943819 km = the perimeter of the triangle ACE in the 1st
case)
- The perimeter of the triangle TM2d = 846722 km
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
Notice (1)
o 943819 km cos (26.22 degrees) = 846722 km
o By the angle 26.22 degrees (in the triangle ABD), the hypotenuse will be
=95900 km where 95900 km x cos (23.4 deg) = 88000 km.
Notice (2)
o (88000 x 29.53) + 61400 km = 846722 km x π
o 60800 km =1/2 the distance AC (121622 km) in the 1st
case triangle.
o This data tells that, there's 2 values of this triangle perimeter 846492 km…
Why? because the data uses a half of distance AC 121622 km?!
o 846492 km x 2 = 1.69 mkm ……………. If 1 degree = 1 mkm
o So this value 1.69 mkm is very near the value 1.7 degrees which is used in
the moon orbital equation…. That supports the claim (there are 2 values of
this triangle perimeter 846492 km).
o Note, 846722 km = π2
x 85790 km (equal 86000 km error 0.2%).
- The previous analysis is a simple analysis for the triangle data….
- But
- In the triangle design analysis we have to consider 2 basic questions, one question
for each triangle case …..
- For the 1st
Case the question is:
- Why the Pythagorean Triangle (1,2 and 51/2
) is a necessary tool for the moon
orbital motion?
- For the 2nd
Case the question is:
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee radius doesn't Equal 2.598 mkm
but is 2.55 mkm which is shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53
days?
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
The Moon Orbital Triangle Design Analysis
- The previous description of the moon orbital triangle in its 2 cases tried to
summarize the basic data found in this triangle
- This triangle should be the basic tool used by the moon in its orbital motion, for
that reason, we need to analyze this data as deep as possible
- Because of that, the paper dedicates the Point No. 4 to analyze the moon orbital
triangle data and to see its effect on the moon orbital motion
- But before to analyze this triangle data…
- We have to discuss how the moon uses Pythagorean triangle rule in its orbital
motion and how this using can be useful to produce the moon orbital motion
equation and then we have to test this equation accuracy with the moon motion
real data, this process we have to do in the point No. 3 of this paper (the next
Point) and then we should return to the moon orbital triangle design analysis in the
point no. 4.
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
3- The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-1 Why Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
3-2 How Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-4 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
3-1 Why Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
- Let's summarize this question answer in following:
o The moon uses Pythagorean triangle basically to decrease its displacement
daily through its orbit
o The moon daily displacement = 88000 km and the moon has to move this
distance every day without any decreasing (later we will know why!)
o But
o If the moon moves by this displacement as its orbital displacement the moon
would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only (r=0.406 mkm)
o For that reason
o The moon creates an angle between its motion direction and its orbit
horizontal level to create a displacement through its orbit less than (88000
km)
o As a result of this technique, the moon can revolve around Earth through
more near orbits than apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm)
o Simply, because the moon uses this technique the moon can revolve around
Earth through perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
o Let's explain this intelligent technique with some details to show the useful
result of using Pythagorean triangle by the moon orbital motion….
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
28
3-2 How Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
- The moon moves daily (88000 km) on the right triangle hypotenuse (AC), but the
moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal
level, by that the real displacement through the moon orbit will be (L= 88000 km
cos (θ)), and by that, spite the moon moves 88000 km, but the real orbital
horizontal displacement be less than (88000 km) and this is the objective for which
the moon uses Pythagorean triangle –
As an example,
- If (θ) =28.63 degrees, the real displacement (L== 88000 km cos (θ)) = 77237 km,
So, if the moon real displacement daily be (77237 km), during 29.53 days the
moon will pass a distance = 2.28 million km and this will be the moon orbital
circumference, where 2.28 mkm = 2π x (0.363 mkm)
- The Moon Orbital Perigee Radius =0.363 mkm
- That means, the moon by a real displacement =77237 km can move around Earth
through the perigee orbit (radius =0.363 mkm), this is the useful result the moon
performs by using Pythagorean triangle,
- Now let's suppose the moon doesn't use Pythagorean triangle, what would
happen?
- The moon daily displacement = 88000 km, during 29.53 days the moon moves a
distance = 2.598 mkm where 2.598 mkm = 2π x (0.413 mkm)
- The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius =0.406 mkm
- So the moon will move along month revolving around Earth through its apogee
orbit (or even far from apogee orbit) because the total distance can't be passed
through any more near orbit around Earth…
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
29
- The data shows how Pythagorean triangle is so useful for the moon orbital
motion.
The Angle θ
- The angle (θ) should get our attention for its specific effect…let's summarize the
idea in following
o The angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L = 88000 cos (θ)), through the
moon orbit..
o We know that, when the real displacement (L) be shorter the moon can
move through near orbits to Earth and by that the moon can be near or at
Perigee radius (0.363 mkm)
o When the real displacement (L) be greater the moon has to move through
orbits far from Earth and by that the moon can be near or at apogee orbit
(r=0.406 mkm)
o That means, the angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L) and also
changes the distance between the moon to perigee or to apogee, shortly, the
angle (θ) defines the moon position (as a ship) between 2 river banks….
- The angle (θ) defines the moon orbital motion basic features and we have to
discuss is deeply with the moon orbital motion equation (θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees),
but before we need to analyze the moon orbital motion
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
30
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion
- The moon moves per a solar day a motion typical to the Earth motion to avoid the
separation from Earth through their motions, based on this rule, the moon moves
per a solar day 2.573 million km with an angle declines on the horizontal level
0.98562 degrees as typical to Earth motion
- If there's no Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon effect on the moon motion,
the moon motion trajectory would to be a parallel line to Earth Motion Trajectory,
But Lorentz Length Contraction effects on the moon motion daily distance (2.573
mkm) with a rate 1.0725 and causes this distance to be contracted (2.399 mkm)
- The moon difficulties are started here, because the difference between both
distances (0.17 mkm) will cause the moon to be separated from Earth motion
inevitably
- We should notice that, these motions are done far from our observation, means, we
see nothing of this motion distance, because the moon moves on the Earth orbital
circumference revolving around the sun, but, even if we can't observe this motion
distance the motion is still fact and proved by its power, because the Earth moves
per a solar day 2.573 mkm and if the moon doesn't move this same distance every
solar day that necessities the moon to be separated from the Earth through their
motions course – based on that- the facts prove this motion regardless our
observation ability for it.
- Now the moon has an additional distance to be passed (0.17 mkm) and the moon
has to pass this distance on the same solar day to avoid the separation from the
Earth during their motions.
- Because of that, the moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on
Earth gravity force (by which we see the moon in the Earth sky), but the different
distance (0.17 mkm) to be covered still needs the moon to move one more
displacement (= 88000 km)
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
31
- The previous explanation tells that, the moon has to move 2 displacements each =
88000 km, while we see one displacement only because it's done through the
moon orbital motion around Earth but the other displacement should be done also
because this total distance (0.17 mkm) is required to cover the different distance
and create the total (2.573 mkm) which saves the moon and Earth motions
accompanying.
- Now we have 2 basic information about the moon orbital motion
o (1st
information) the moon uses Pythagorean triangle in its orbital motion
o (2nd
information) the moon has to move 2 displacements each =88000 km
and their total distance =0.17 mkm which is a required distance necessary to
cover the difference between the moon and Earth motions distances.
- This explanation helps us to understand why the moon uses Pythagorean triangle
in its motion, because the moon can't decrease its daily displacement (88000 km)
because the moon needs this distance to cover the different distance between its
contracted motion distance (2.399 mkm) and Earth motion distance (2.573 mkm),
So the moon needs to move this displacement perfectly, but if it's used as a
displacement through the moon orbit, the moon would be always a prisoner in the
apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm) as we have discussed before, because of that, the
moon creates Pythagorean triangle technique by which the moon moves actually
88000 km daily but the real displacement through the moon orbit became less (L =
88000 Cos θ) and by that the moon can achieve 2 objectives, First to pass the
required distance (88000 km) and Second to move in near orbits to Earth, that
shows the intelligent moon motion technique…
- (Notice, Lorentz Length Contraction Effect Discussion is in Appendix No. 1)
32. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
32
The Moon Orbital Motion Needs One More Orbit
- The previous explanation tells that, the moon moves 2 displacements each =88000
km, we see one of these 2 displacements but where's the other displacement?!
- We know that, the moon original motion (2.573 mkm) which is contracted to be
(2.399 mkm) isn't seen by us because the moon moves this distance revolving with
Earth around the sun along the Earth Orbital Circumference
- We may accept that, the 2nd
displacement the moon does on this same trajectory
and isn't seen by us.
- So,
- There must be one more orbit for the moon to move through this 2nd
displacement.
means,
- There's 2nd
Orbits For The Moon Motion
- But
- How can we discover this second orbit if we can't observe the 2nd
displacement
motion?
- We can discover this 2nd
orbit by the moon orbit data analysis. So we should
depend on the moon orbital triangle data analysis to define this 2nd
orbit position.
- For that we have to discuss the moon 2nd
orbit in our deep analysis of The Moon
Orbital Triangle Geometrical Structure.
33. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
33
3-4 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
3-4-1 The Equation Concept
3-4-2 The Equation Test and Accuracy
3-4-1 The Equation Concept
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- The moon orbital motion equation is created depending on the concept we have
discussed before which is (the moon uses Pythagorean triangle in its orbital motion)
- The moon uses Pythagorean triangle and by this intelligent technique the moon be
under control of the angle (θ) change
- The angle (θ) defines almost all the moon motion features.…
- The moon uses this technique, aiming to create a real displacement shorter than its
actual displacement (88000 km) based on the equation (L =88000 cos (θ)) and by
that while the moon moves a displacement =88000 km but the real displacement
(L) through its orbit be shorter than 88000 km and by that the moon can revolve
around Earth through more near orbits than its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm).
- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this concept and, the equation
uses (the constant) 1.7 degrees as the moon daily motion degrees, and the equation
uses the previous day angle (θ0) to produce the today angle (θ1)
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- We have 3 questions in this equation which are:
o How does this equation work?
o Is this equation trustee and correct?
o Why does the equation use the angle 1.7 degrees? Let's try to answer….
34. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
34
How to use this equation?
- Perigee Radius =0.363 mkm, so Its Orbital Circumference =2.28 mkm
- Suppose the moon will revolve around Earth through perigee orbit only during
29.53 days, so
- (2.28 mkm /29.53 days) = 77237 km
- This is (the real displacement = L = 88000 km Cos θ = 77237 km),
- What's the angle θ value? the angle θ = 28.63 degrees
- Suppose the moon stand on this point yesterday with the angle (θ) =28.63 degrees,
where the moon will move today?
- From Perigee (the most near point to Earth) the moon will move in Ascending
motion because it moves from perigee (0.363 mkm) to apogee (0.406 mkm)
- In Ascending motion we use (-1.7 degrees) because the angle (θ) is decreased
where the real displacement (L) is increased, So let's do that in following
o (θ1= θ0 - 1.7 degrees)
o (θ1= 28.63 degrees - 1.7 degrees) = 26.93 degrees
o L = 88000 Cos (26.93 degrees) = 78454 km
o During 29.53 days so (78454 km x 29.53 days = 2.316 mkm)
o 2.316 mkm = 2π x 368722 km
That means
o The moon was (before motion) on Perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm) and starts
its motion displacement 88000 km. For day motion the equation uses 1.7
degrees, that means, the moon on perigee uses Pythagorean triangle with
angle (28.63 degrees) and during one solar day the moon uses - 1.7 degrees
and by that the angle will be (26.93 degrees)…... The angle 1.7 degrees
expresses The Moon Daily Motion
o By using Pythagorean triangle its angle (θ) = 26.93 degrees, the
displacement (88000 km) will create a real displacement through the moon
orbit = 78454 km and the moon will finish its motion today at a distance
35. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
35
368722 km means the moon is far from perigee radius with (368722 km-
363000 km =5722 km )
o So, the moon after 1 day motion (tomorrow) will be at the point 368722 km
and will have the Pythagorean triangle its angle 26.93 degrees.
The Descending Motion
o When the moon moves from apogee (0.406 mkm) to perigee (0.363 mkm),
so the angle (1.7 degrees) will be positive (+1.7 degrees) because the angle
(θ) is increased and the real displacement (L = 88000 Cos (θ)) be shorter.
So
o If the moon in apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm), what's the angle (θ)?
o The apogee orbital circumference = 0.406 mkm x2π =2.55 mkm = 29.53
days x 86400 km, the angle (θ) = 10.96 degrees (=11 deg approx.)
o The moon moves from apogee to perigee (descending motion)
o (θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees) means (θ1= 11 degrees + 1.7 degrees) = 12.7 deg.
o L = 88000 Cos (12.7 degrees) = 85847 km
o During 29.53 days so (85847 km x 29.53 days = 2.535 mkm)
o 2.535 mkm = 2π x 403467 km
So
o After one day the moon will be on 403467 km far from apogee (406000 km)
with 2540 km
Now let's see this equation test and efficiency in following
36. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
36
3-4-2 The Equation Test and Accuracy
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- I have tested the Equation with real data for 2 months June 2020 and October 2020
- The results are very good and I provide the results here for better vision
concerning the equation efficiency
1st
Test June 2020
Day Registered Data The Results (1.7) Difference
6-6-2020 369418 km
7-6-2020 373729 km 374772.5 - 1044
8-6-2020 378917 km 378821.5 96
9-6-2020 384534 km 383667.7 867
10-6-2020 390096 km 388890 1206
11-6-2020 395156 km 394000 1156
12-6-2020 399345 km 398604.2 741
13-6-2020 402395 km 402361.3 34
14-6-2020 404153 km 405052.8 -900
15-6-2020 404574 km ---- ---
16-6-2020 403718 km 401848.5 1870
17-6-2020 401733 km 400876.1 857
18-6-2020 398840 km 398640.7 200
19-6-2020 395303 km 395417.4 115
20-6-2020 391409 km 391521.2 -113
21-6-2020 387432 km 387273.4 159
22-6-2020 383607 km 382968.4 639
23-6-2020 380110 km 378852 1258
24-6-2020 377044 km 375107 1937
25-6-2020 374451 km 371836.5 2615
26-6-2020 372338 km 369077 3262
27-6-2020 370703 km 366855.6 3847
[
37. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
37
The 1st
Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 20 Values
(1st
Category)
o 15 values, defines the moon position in range 1300 km (Error 3%)
(2nd
Category)
o 2 values, defines the moon position in range 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
(3rd
Category)
o 3 values, defines the moon position in range 2000-3500 km (Error 8 %)
- The Results Explanation
- The distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km…
o 1st
Category of results defines the moon position in error range (1300 km) =
error (3%), that means, (15 values of 20) defines the moon position with
error (3%) only (Small Error Range)
o 2nd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (1300
km to 2000 km) = error (4.5%), that means (2 values of 20) defines the
moon position with error (4.5%) (Average Error Range)
o 3rd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (2000
km to 3500 km) = error (8%), that means (3 values of 20) defines the moon
position with error (8%) (Great Error Range)
- The Equation Accuracy
o The previous explanation shows that, the equation has a good range of
accuracy and its error is in the acceptable error range
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
And
It's a useful tool to define the moon position daily
38. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
38
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
2nd
Test October 2020
Day Registered Data Results (1.7) Difference
5-10-2020 405,690 km --- ---
6-10-2020 404,171 km 403125.3 km 1046 km
7-10-2020 401,649 km 401390 km 259 km
8-10-2020 398,073 km 398545.6 Km - 473 km
9-10-2020 393,464 km 394568.8 km -1105 km
10-10-2020 387,944 km 389510 km -1567 km
11-10-2020 381,763 km 383520 km -1758 km
12-10-2020 375,302 km 376875.3km -1574 km
13-10-2020 369,063 km 369981km -919 km
14-10-2020 363,617 km 363363.4km 254 km
15-10-2020 359,530 km 357612 km 1918 km
16-10-2020 357,269 km 353307 km 3962 km
17-10-2020 357,105 km ---- --
18-10-2020 359,048 km --- --
19-10-2020 362,851 km 364979.7 km - 2129 km
20-10-2020 368,058 km 368579.3 km -522 km
21-10-2020 374,101 km 373492.4 km 609 km
22-10-2020 380,412 km 379168.3 Km 1244 Km
23-10-2020 386,497 km 385059.3Km 1438 km
24-10-2020 391,989 km 390694.3 km 1295 km
25-10-2020 396,659 km 395729.5 km 930 km
26-10-2020 400,395 km 399958.7 km 437 km
27-10-2020 403,181 km 403299 km 112 km
28-10-2020 405,059 km 405738.5 km -680 km
29-10-2020 406,104 km 407359.4 km -1256 km
[
39. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
39
The Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 22 Values
(1st
Category)
o 15 values, defines the moon position in range 1300 km (Error 3%)
(2nd
Category)
o 5 values, defines the moon position in range 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
(3rd
Category)
o 2 values, defines the moon position in range 2000-3500 km (Error 8 %)
- The Results Explanation
- The distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km…
o 1st
Category of results defines the moon position in error range (1300 km) =
error (3%), that means, (15 values of 22) defines the moon position with
error (3%) only (Small Error Range)
o 2nd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (1300
km to 2000 km) = error (4.5%), that means (5 values of 22) defines the
moon position with error (4.5%) (Average Error Range)
o 3rd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (2000
km to 3500 km) = error (8%), that means (2 values of 22) defines the moon
position with error (8%) (Great Error Range)
- The Equation Accuracy
o The previous explanation shows that, the equation has a good range of
accuracy and its error is in the acceptable error range
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
And
It's a useful tool to define the moon position daily
40. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
40
3-4-3 The Value 1.7 degrees
- The 3rd
question was, why the equation uses 1.7 degrees?
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
Because
1.7 degrees = 0.98562 degrees + 0.712 degrees
Where
- 0.98562 degrees = Earth motion daily degrees, and it equals the moon daily
motion degrees because the moon has to move an equal distance to Earth motion
daily distance to save their motions accompanying
- This question and the angle 0.712 degrees is discussed deeply (Metonic Cycle
Discussion Point No. 6)
41. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
41
The Moon Motion Difficulties
- There are 2 basic difficulties are observed in the moon orbital motions, let's refer
to them in following:
o (1st
Difficulty) The moon moves per day different distances from perigee to
apogee…..
o We know the moon moves from perigee to apogee (go and back) during
Anomalistic month (27.55 solar days)
o (43000 km x 2) / 27.55 days = 3122 km
o The moon doesn't use this rate (3122 km) in its motion, instead the moon
can move (6000 km) on one day only and on another day may move only
2500 km (or even less)!
o The moon orbital equation tries to solve this difficulty by using the rate 1.7
degrees in the equation (θ1 = θ0 + 1.7 degrees), the value 1.7 degrees is a
great number and enables the moon to move around (5000 km) per solar day
and by that if the moon moves per solar day 4000 km the different distance
will be 1000 km and if the moon moves 6000 km the different will be
– 1000 km, it’s the same difference, and by that, the error be more less
enables the equation to be more efficient..
o (2nd
Difficulty) The moon stays in perigee and apogee points long time….
o That means, while the moon be on perigee or apogee, the moon doesn't use
the equation and doesn't change its distance to perigee or apogee for long
days…we may notice that in the equation tests, when the moon reach to
perigee or apogee the equation stops its work and stays 2 or 3 days to return
to its work… because the moon consumes long time to leave the points
(perigee and apogee)…
42. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
42
4-The Moon Orbit Geometrical Design
4-1 Preface
4-2 The Necessity Of Pythagorean Triangle (1, 2, 51/2
)
4-3 Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?
4-4 The moon motion angle (12.195 deg) Analysis
4-5 Why The Moon Displacement Daily =88000 km?
4-6 The angle 71.9 degrees
4-7 Why The Moon Day Period =29.53 days?
4-8 The Perpendicular Line BC (=86000 km)
43. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
43
4-1 Preface
On What Facts This Study Depend?
On The Logical Geometrical Structure
- Please remember, the green line (the triangle base EA) has an angle 1.1 degrees with the
moon equator line, and an angle 0.443 degrees with the Earth Ecliptic
- Example.
- The moon orbital triangle base (The Green Line) (EA) = 449197 km
- In this distance, the point (A) I have concluded and was not found in the moon
motion data sheet, so Can be this point (A) a real point, or it's invented one?
o The distance EA causes the distance BD (43000 km) be = DA (43000 km)
o The distance EA 449197 km = Jupiter Circumference
o The distance BA = 86000 km = BC
o The triangle BCD is a Pythagorean specific triangle (1, 2, 51/2
)
o The perimeter of the triangle (ECA) = the distance from the point (A) to the
end on the lunar eclipse umbra length (1.392 mkm).
If I have invented the point (A), how can I created these relationships with it, where I
depend on the moon orbital motion real data? The main power behind this analytical
study is The Logical Geometrical Structure Of The Moon Orbital Motion Data.
44. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
44
4-2 The Necessity of Pythagorean Triangle (1, 2, 51/2
)
(1st
Point) The Moon Motion Limits Definition
- In this moon orbital triangle I have added the line CS to create a total angle =137
degrees – based on that
(A)
- The angle ECS =137 degrees
- The distance BS = 150628 km
- The distance SA = 64628 km
- The hypotenuse CS = 173450 km
- The perimeter of the triangle BCS = 173450 +150628 +86000 = 410080 km
- The triangle perimeter (BCS) =410080 km= the apogee radius (406000 km)
(error 1%)
(B)
- The perimeter of the triangle (ACS) = 121622 + 173450 +64628 = 359700 km
- Perigee radius = 363000 km (error 1%)
A Conclusion
- The triangle BCS defines the moon motion limits from perigee to apogee by a
geometrical mechanism depends on The angle 137 degrees……. Why & How?
45. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
45
(2nd
Point) The Rate 0.08
Why Pythagorean Triangle (1,2, 51/2
) Is Required?
This figure is discussed before.
- The inner circle refers to the perigee orbit
- The outer circle refers to the apogee orbit
- OB = 406000 km = Apogee Radius
- OR = 363000 km = Perigee Radius
- DB = 181843 km
- Perigee Orbital Circumference = 2.28 mkm
- Apogee Orbital Circumference = 2.55 mkm
I - Data
(1)
(DB / Perigee Orbital Circumference) = (181843 km/2.28 mkm) = 0.08
(2)
10.96 = 137 (The basic Angle) x 0.08
(3)
Sin (10.96 degrees) x 406000 km = 77237 km
(4)
Cos (10.96 degrees) 88000 km = 86400 km
(5)
Sin (10.96 degrees) 449197 km = 85403 km
II – Discussion
- Why is the Pythagorean triangle (1,2,51/2
) required for the moon orbital motion?
- Because, the rate (0.08) is required to create interaction with the angle (137 deg),
and based on this interaction, the valuable angle (10.96 degrees) will be created,
and based on this angle (10.96 degrees) most of the moon orbital motion data will
be created.
46. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
46
- That answers the question why the rates (1,2,51/2
) were required necessary for the
moon orbital motion? because based on these rates the rate (0.08) will be produced
which will be used to produce the angle (10.96 degrees)…… So
- Based on the angle (CSB =137 degrees), the moon orbital motion receives 3 basic
data which are
o The apogee point radius (r=0.406 mkm) which is defined by the triangle
BCS) Perimeter
o The Perigee point radius (r=0.363 mkm) which is defined by the triangle
ACS) Perimeter
o And the rate (0.08) which is defined between the tangent DB (181843 km)
and the perigee orbital circumference (2.28 mkm)…….. then
o 10.96 = 137 x 0.08
o The valuable angle (10.96 degrees) is created.
Equation No. (3)
Sin (10.96 degrees) x 406000 km = 77237 km
- This equation tells the story in more clear way….
- The value 77237 km is very important…. If the moon moves daily a displacement
= 77237 km, during 29.53 days, the total distance will be = 2.28 mkm = the moon
orbital circumference at perigee orbit (r= 363000 km)
- Means,
- The perigee orbital circumference = 29.53 displacements each =77237 km, that
tells the value (77237 km) is defined by perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm) and the
moon day period (29.53 solar days), whatsoever the moon apogee radius be ….
Now the angle (10.96 deg) is defined before (10.96 = 137 x 0.08), and by that the
apogee radius is defined….
- This explanation is not so correct because the apogee radius is defined before by
the triangle (BCS) Perimeter and (the rate 0.08) is defined based on it because we
use it in the circles figure.
47. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
47
- I try to show that, we deal here with few players are created depending on each
other , all of them has on origin which is the angle 137 degrees, and has one result
which is the angle (10.96 deg)… what I try to do here is to show how the data is
arranged in a clear direction, and by that, I may prove this is A Directed Data.
Equation No. (4)
Cos (10.96 degrees) 88000 km = 86400 km
- The analysis is still complex and we need to consider it deeply in following…..
- Where
o The moon orbital circumference at apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm) equals
only 2.55 mkm and this distance is short!
o Because
o The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 solar days the
total displacements will be = 2.598 mkm …..if this distance be the moon
orbital circumference the radius will be = 0.413 mkm
o Means, the apogee radius will not be 0.406 mkm but 0.413 mkm !
o Which proves the paper claim, that, the moon uses Pythagorean triangle in
its motion,
o But
o Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee is not = 2.598 mkm? Why
the moon orbital circumference at apogee =2.55 mkm and less with (1%)
than the total displacements during 29.53 days?
- Equation No. (4) tells us this story clearly, where the apogee orbit permits for a
moon daily displacement =86400 km and NOT 88000 km
Notice
- This is a theoretical analysis and not a practical one, the moon could use 88000 km
as its displacement without using Pythagorean triangle technique for any days
during the month BUT with a condition that, the total distance isn't greater than
2.55 million km (= the moon apogee orbital circumference).
48. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
48
- Why the apogee orbital circumference doesn't equal 2.598 mkm?
- Let's analyze the moon different motions in following to see this data as clear as
possible
More Data
(A)
The moon orbital circumference at apogee point = 2.55 mkm (100 %)
The Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.5734 mkm (101%)
The moon total displacements during 29.53 days = 2.598 mkm (102%)
Pluto motion distance during its day (153.3 h) = 2.5938 mkm (102%)
(B)
137 =95.1 x 1.44
More Discussion
Data No. A
- The first and third distances are the moon motion distances, where, it’s the moon
orbital circumference (2.55 mkm) and its total displacements (2.598 mkm)…
- The second distance is the moon motion distance also, because the moon moves
per solar day a distance equal Earth motion distance per solar day perfectly
otherwise the moon and Earth will be separated in the motions course.
- We have 3 motions are arranged in (100%, 101%, 102%) all of them are done by
the moon– There must be a geometrical mechanism behind this order-
- We deal with some gears, and these gears are required to be rated to each other to
enable to do their jobs –
- i.e.
- The moon orbital circumference at apogee (2.55 mkm) is NOT short distance, it's
created for some geometrical necessity to enable the machine of gears to work
- This discussion should be completed with the next point (4-3) because more data
analysis may help us greatly. We should do after the data discussion completion.
49. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
49
Equation No. (B)
137 =95.1 x 1.44
- We still don't know why this angle 137 degrees has so massive effect on the moon
orbital motion…?
- Equation no. (B) may help us, Let's discuss it
o 95.1 degrees = 90 degrees + 5.1 degrees (the moon orbital inclination)
o 1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression degrees per month
- So, the angle 137 degrees, is created by the moon orbit motion effect,
- 2 features of the moon orbit motion are unified together to produce this angle (137
degrees) which is the origin of the moon motion distance from perigee to apogee..
which are
o The moon orbital inclination 5.1 degrees
o The moon orbit regression 1.44 degrees per Month.
- These 2 features of the moon orbital motion creates together the angle 137 degrees
as their platform to create the moon orbital motion in harmony with these 2
features…
Notice
- 180 degrees -137 degrees = 43 degrees
- If 1 degree =1000 km, so
- The value 43 degrees expresses the distance 43000 km which is the distance
between Perigee and apogee….
- Also, the triangle (ACS) Perimeter =359700 km = 360000 km
- If 1 degree =1000 km, so this value 360000 km will be equivalent to 360 degrees.
- The data tells that, a geometrical mechanism is found behind it creates this data
based on each other geometrically.
50. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
50
(3rd
Point) The Angle 10.96 degrees
By this triangle we follow the moon motion data based on the angle 10.96 degrees.
We start from apogee radius (r=406000 km) on the AC as following
(1)
- AC =406000 km the angle C= 10.96 deg what's BC?
- BC = 398595 km
(2)
- AC =398595 km the angle C= 10.96 deg what's BC?
- BC = 391324 km
(3)
- AC =391324 km the angle C= 10.96 deg what's BC?
- BC = 384186 km
(4)
- AC =384186 km the angle C= 10.96 deg what's BC?
- BC = 377179 km
(5)
- AC =377179 km the angle C= 10.96 deg what's BC?
- BC = 370300 km
(6)
- AC =370300 km the angle C= 10.96 deg what's BC?
- BC = 363546 km
The 4 distances (in blue color) are the moon motion basic 4 points.
The moon motion depends on the angle 10.96 degrees.
51. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
51
Equation No. (5)
Sin (10.96 degrees) 449197 km = 85403 km
- Equation no. (5) tries to help the explanation,
o The distance 85403 km is very near to the line BC =86000 km (error 0.7%)
o Also the distance 86000 km = 2 x 43000 km ( Perigee apogee distance)
o But
o The distance 449197 km is created based on the point (A) which is invented
and not found in the moon data sheet….
o By what geometrical mechanism the angle 10.96 degrees uses the distance
449197 km to produce the line BC 86000 km?! The data tells that the
distance (449197 km) is a real one and isn't invented …. Also the line BC
(86000 km) is real data.
o That means, the moon orbital triangle is discovered and not invented.
o And the data which is concluded by it as real as the moon registered data by
observation.
52. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
52
4-3 Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?
(Point No. I)
- In the triangle DCX the hypotenuse CX = 413345 km
- Let's remember
o The moon displacement for a solar day = 88000 km
o During 29.53 solar days the total will be = 2.59864 mkm
o 2.59864 mkm = 2π x 413560 km
o means, the moon orbital triangle data considers the distance 2.598 mkm and
uses it in its geometrical structure but for some geometrical necessity the
moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't=2.598 mkm BUT= 2.55 mkm.
BUT
- What's this geometrical necessity for which the moon orbital circumference at
apogee radius be 2.55 mkm in place of 2.598 mkm? Let's try to answer in
following….
Notice
o Because XE =1700 km the hypotenuse CE will be =415000 km.
53. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
53
(Point No. II) The Moon total displacements 2.598 mkm
- In this moon orbital triangle I have used the distance 2.598
- Where
- The hypotenuse CE2 = 2598640 km = the moon total displacements during 29.53
solar days
- The point E2 is defined by this hypotenuse on the triangle base (AE)
- No more changes are done …. Let's consider what's happening as a result
o The angle E2 = 1.896 degrees
o The angle E2 CB = 88.1 degrees
o The hypotenuse CE2 = 2598640 km
o The distance DE2 = 2597217 km
o But
o BD = 42800 km
o BE2 = 2554417 km = 2π x 406550 km
o The moon apogee radius = 406000 km
- The data tells that
o (1st
) The moon displacements total (2.598 mkm) is considered as the basic
value in the moon orbital triangle because it's used as the hypotenuse
o (2nd
) the moon orbital apogee radius (406000 km) is produced based on the
moon orbital triangle geometrical interaction.
o But
o For what geometrical interaction the apogee circumference be 2.55 mkm?!
54. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
54
(Point No. III) The Moon & Mars Motions Interaction
- The basic result of this triangle is the angle 1.89 degrees based on which the
hypotenuse CE2 =2.598 mkm is created.
- 1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination
- The moon works as a gear to connect Earth Motion with Mars Motion, in more
clear words, Venus & Earth Motions interaction effect on Mars Motion and this
effect is done by the moon motion effect on Mars Motion! this idea we have to
analyze as deep as possible, let's see the data in following….
Notice
- The perimeter of the triangle CDE2 = 5281856.6 km
- The perimeter of the triangle CBE2 = 5249007.6m
- The difference = 32849 km
- The distance from the moon center and the ecliptic line will be =32849 km when
the moon be far from Earth with a distance = 369530 km (this value less 1% of the
distance CE =373000 km).
55. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
55
The Moon & Mars Motions Interaction Analysis
I-Data
(a)
1.883 deg = 1.44 deg + 0.443 deg
25.3 = 1.9 +23.4
(b)
137 deg -25 deg = 113.44 deg -1.44 deg
(c)
80 x 1.44 deg = 115.2 deg =17.4 +97.8
81 x 1.44 deg =116.6 deg
(d)
23.36 = 29.2 x 0.8
2.082 = 2.598 x 0.8
2.41 =3.02 x 0.8
1.44 = 1.8 x 0.8
(e)
1.44 x 17.4 = 25.06
1.44 x 12 = 17.34
II-Discussion
- The interaction between Mars and the Earth Moon Motions is known and can be
proved clearly from their data …. For example
o Mars orbital period 687 days = the moon orbital period 27.3 days x 25.2
o The moon daily motion (13.177 deg) / Mars daily motion (0.524 deg) =25.2
o Mars orbital period 687 days = 2 x 343.5 days (the nodal year =346.6 days)
o Mars orbital period 687 days = Earth orbital period 365.25 days x 1.9
o (1.9 deg = Mars orbital inclination) (25.2 deg = Mars Axial Tilt)
o The data shows the interaction between Mars on one side and the Earth with
its moon on the other side
56. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
56
o But, 2 questions are raised accordingly …
o (1st
question) what's the origin point of this interaction?
o (2nd
question) Why this interaction is seen more clear than Earth and its
moon interaction with Venus where Venus is more near than Mars?!
Let's consider the first question now, and the second we should interest for later
(1st
question) what's the origin point of this interaction?
Equation No. (a)
1.883 deg = 1.44 deg + 0.443 deg
1.9 degrees = Mars orbital inclination,
- This value is created by a direct effect of the moon orbit regression… where the
moon orbit regresses 1.44 degrees per a month and this value is added to the
difference 0.443 degrees (which is found between the moon orbital triangle and the
ecliptic line) to produce the value 1.883 degrees which can be considered as the
moon orbital inclination – this is the angle we have found in the triangle
(CE2D)…
- This angle is created based on the moon displacements total during a month…
the word month should be kept with us because it tells some very important
geometrical reference….
- If so, does the value 1.9 degrees (mars orbital inclination) is created based on a
month period? But Mars daily motion =0.524 degrees where
o (1/0.524 degree) =1.9 degrees
o For Mars the value 1.9 deg is used for the daily motion! it's also a period of
time, but why? what's for Month in the moon motion can be for a day in
Mars motion? how to understand that?!
o The value 1.9 degrees still needs more analysis.. Let's do it in following..
57. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
57
More Data (old)
1.3 degrees (Jupiter orbital inclination) = 1.9 degrees - 0.6 degrees
2.5 degrees (Saturn orbital inclination) = 1.9 degrees + 0.6 degrees
- Let's remember how the moon orbital triangle originally is created…
- Uranus axial tilt =97.8 degrees and the Earth moon axial tilt =6.7 degrees, the
difference between both =91.1 degrees
- The perpendicularity between Uranus and the moon axial tilt faces the problem of
the angle 1.1 degrees, how to produce this perpendicularity between them?
- The solution was to raise the triangle base with and angle 1.1 degrees and by
Uranus axial tilt will be perpendicular on the triangle base if this base depends on
the moon axial tilt and has an angle 1.1 degrees with it
- By this description the moon orbital triangle is created and developed
- That means, under the triangle bases there's 1.1 degrees and the moon diameter
consumes 0.5 degrees (the moon angular diameter) by that, the rest angle should
be =0.6 degrees
- Which we see in the data…
- By this data I suppose that Jupiter and Saturn do some interaction for this value 0.6
degrees and this interaction depends on the angle 1.9 degrees which ill be used as
Mars orbital inclination
So
- The angle 1.89 deg in the triangle CDE2 is found as one form of this same
interaction done by Jupiter and Saturn based on the angle 0.6 degrees where the
moon uses the other part 0.5 degrees for the total 1.1 degrees.
- That tells
- This interaction of Jupiter and Saturn effect also on the moon motion which is
absolute true, because under the triangle base we have a network of motions
interactions effect.
58. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
58
- To see that as deep as possible, we may remember the angle 137 deg
- 137 deg = 95.1 deg x 1.44 deg
o 95.1 degrees = 90 deg +5.1 deg (the moon orbital inclination)
o 1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression degrees per month
o How to understand this equation…?!
o The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during a year 365.25 days the
total displacement = 32142000 km = 32.142 mkm = 2π x 5.1 mkm
o If 1 degree = 1 mkm
o 5.1 mkm will be = 5.1 degrees = the moon orbital inclination.
That means
o The equation 137 deg = 95.1 deg x 1.44 deg uses the value of a year in
multiplication with a value of a month to produce 137 degrees
o And what's this 137?!
o What result we receive if we multiply a monthly value with a year value?!
o I have a similar data to create some confidence in this analysis …
o 10747 days = 365.25 days x 29.53 days where
o 365.25 days = A year
o 29.53 days = a month
o 10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
o It's a real interaction which is found clearly in all planets data
o What a result we have got from this analysis?! The moon orbital
circumference is created depending on a month value because of the moon
& Mars motions Interaction.
Notice
25.3 degrees = Earth axial tilt 23.4 deg + 1.9 deg Mars orbital inclination …But
25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt
59. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
59
Equation No. (b)
137 deg -25 deg = 113.44 deg -1.44 deg
- Equation No. (b) supports this same argument
- 113.44 degrees = 90 deg + 23.44 degrees (Earth Axial Tilt)
- 1.44 degrees = the moon orbit regression per month
- 137 degrees = the original angle on which the moon triangle is created
- 25 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt (25.2 deg), that puts Mars Motion inside the
deep interaction between Earth and the moon motions.
Equation No. (e)
1.44 x 17.4 = 25.06
1.44 x 12 = 17.34
- 17.4 degrees = The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
- 12 degrees = the angle CXD where the hypotenuse CX =413345 km
- That shows the moon orbit regression (per month) is defined by all inner planets
motions interactions effect.
- So based on 12 degrees the value 17.4 degrees is created and based on this last one
17.4 degrees the value 25.06 degrees (Mars axial tilt 25.2 deg) is created
- Mars motion interaction with the moon motion is done by a support from all inner
planets for the moon to perform this interaction.
60. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
60
Uranus effect on the inner planets motions
Equation No. (d)
23.36 = 29.2 x 0.8
2.082 = 2.598 x 0.8
2.41 =3.02 x 0.8
1.44 = 1.8 x 0.8
- 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
- Uranus motion effects on the inner planets motions strongly and clearly and by this
effect the moon orbit regresses by 1.44 degrees per month.
- This definition of regression per month is a definition done by Uranus and passes
through all inner planets from Uranus till reach to the moon motion
- It's one thread starts from Uranus, passes through Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars
till reach to the moon and by that this value 1.44 degrees effects on all inner
planets motions! Let's see the data in some details
o 23.36 = 29.2 x 0.8
o Earth moves during 29.53 days a value 29.2 degrees but the moon moves
during the same period 29.53 days a value = 360 deg + 29.2 degrees, by
Uranus orbital inclination effect Earth axial tilt 23.4 deg is created based on
this value 29.2 degrees (based on a month period of motion)
o 1.44 = 1.8 x 0.8
o 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination, by an effect of Uranus orbital
inclination 0.8 deg will produce 1.44 deg which is the moon regression per
month .
61. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
61
o 2.082 mkm = 2.598 mkm x 0.8
o The moon total displacements during 29.53 days 2.598 mkm by Uranus
orbital inclination 0.8 deg will produce Mars motion distance during a solar
day 2.082 mkm, (again what's for a month for the moon is used as a day
period for Mars!)
o 2.41 mkm =3.02 mkm x 0.8
o 3.02 mkm Venus motion distance during a solar day
o 2.41 mkm the moon motion distance during a solar day (after the contraction
where the moon moves per solar day 2.57 mkm = Earth motion per solar day
otherwise the moon and Earth will be separated from Each other but the
moon motion distance is contracted by the rate 1.0725 and the contracted
distance will be 2.41 mkm).
o Why Venus distance will be equivalent to the moon contracted distance by
Uranus effect? Why not the distance 2.57 mkm which is found before
contraction or after the addition of the 2 displacements (2 x 88000 km)?
o Venus has some relationship with the contraction! The data tells that,
o (2.57 mkm/2.41 mkm) = (29.53 days /27.3 days) = (243 days /224.7 days)
o 243 days = Venus rotation period
o 224.7 days = Venus orbital period
The 2nd
question may help us
(2nd
question) Why this interaction is seen more clear than Earth and its moon
interaction with Venus where Venus is more near than Mars?!
62. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
62
(Point No. VI) The Moon & Venus Motions Interaction
Data
(1)
(224.7 days /29.53 days) = (137 /18) = 10.96 /1.44)
243 = 8.9 x 27.3
(2)
5.1 deg =3 x 1.7 but 3.4 deg = 2 x 1.7
(3)
5040 seconds x 35 km/sec = 88200 km
(4)
177.4 deg =113.6 deg + 63.8 deg
(5)
2550973 km = 21.86 x 116664km
(6)
116.75 x π = 366.7
Discussion
- The question is clear …
- Venus is more near to the moon & Earth why we see more clear interaction
between Mars and the moon motions but we don't see that between Venus and the
moon motions?!
- Venus effects on the moon orbital motion more strong than Mars effect on it
- But
- Why the data doesn't show that?!
- It's almost related to Venus Language …. It takes another language!
- Let's try to explain that in following ….
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (58.66 solar days) a distance =243 mkm,
BUT Venus sees this number as 243 solar days (=Venus Rotation Period)
63. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
63
- The data tells that, because of Mercury motion during its rotation period Venus
rotation period be =243 mkm!
- The distance value for Venus is seen as a period time.... !!
- And the vice versa ….. it's a language between Venus and Mercury
- For that
- Venus moves during 365.25 solar days a distance =1103 mkm = 2π x175.5 mkm
- But
- Mercury day period =175.94 days (error 0.2%).
- It's a mutual language between both…
- Also
- Mars know this language and moves during 116.75 solar days (Venus Day Period)
a distance =243 mkm which Venus sees as (243 days also)!
- So, Venus has stronger effect on the moon motion but we don't understand its
language!
- For that reason, the moon daily displacement 88000 km became 88 days (Mercury
orbital period) and the moon needs 2 displacements per a solar day (176000 km)
for that reason Mercury day period be (175.94 solar days)…
- The data may help our discussion
Equation (3)
5040 seconds x 35 km/sec = 88200 km
- Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days
- But
- Venus moves during 5040 seconds a distance =88200 km = approximately =88000
km the moon daily displacement… that shows Mercury & Venus Motions
interaction to effect on the moon orbital motion.
64. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
64
Equation (3)
5.1 deg =3 x 1.7 but 3.4 deg = 2 x 1.7
- We remember the question why the equation uses 1.7 deg (θ1= θ0+1.7)
- The moon orbital inclination 5.1 deg is created depends on Venus orbital
inclination 3.4 deg as the same rate ….!
- Mercury day period = 2 Mercury orbital period = 3 Mercury rotation period
- Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days
Equation (1)
(224.7 days /29.53 days) = (137 /18) = 10.96 /1.44)
243 = 8.9 x 27.3
- 224.7 days = Venus Orbital Period
- 29.53 days = the moon day period
-
- inclination 3.4 deg as the same rate ….!
- Mercury day period = 2 Mercury orbital period = 3 Mercury rotation period
- Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days
- 137 deg = the original angle
- 10.96 = the valuable angle which we have discussed
- 1.44 = the moon orbit regression per month
What's the most clear effect of Venus Motion on the moon motion?
- The moon orbital circumference at apogee 2.55 mkm where the moon day period
=29.53 solar days =2.55 million seconds
65. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
65
4-4 The Moon Motion Angle (12.195 degrees) Analysis
I-Data
(I)
Sin (12.195 degrees) x 407300 km = 88000 km
And
13.177 degrees – 0.98562 degrees = 12.195 degrees
(II)
(10.96 degrees) + 1.25 degrees =12.195 degrees
Where
13.177 degrees = the moon daily motion degrees
0.98562 degrees = Earth daily motion degrees
0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
II- Discussion
- The Apogee Orbit (r=0.406 mkm) permits a displacement =86400 km only based
on the valuable angle (10.96 degrees), as maximum displacement during 29.53
days because (86400 km x 29.53 days = 2.55 mkm = 2π x 0.406 mkm)
- But
- What about the actual displacement 88000 km, which angle expresses it?
- The data shows that, the angle 12.195 degrees can define this displacement (88000
km) relative to the radius (407300 km) which is very near to apogee radius =
(406000 km) (error 0.3%).
- Equation No (II) tells that, Uranus orbital inclination 0.8 degrees is used as (1/0.8),
i.e.
- The angle (10.96 degrees) + (1/0.8 degrees) = 12.195 degrees
- The data shows Uranus effect on the moon orbital motion
NOTICE (1)
Uranus effect on the moon orbital motion will be discussed in the next point (no. 4-5,
why the moon daily displacement =88000 km?)
66. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
66
NOTICE (2)
The following explanation shows a new geometrical technique is using in the moon
geometrical structure, it's just example using the angle 12.195 deg in this technique
I-Data
- In the triangle ABC
- AB = 12.195 km
- AC = 2 x 29.53 km
- The Angle A = 78.081
- The Angle C = 11.919 degrees
- But
- Cos (12.195 degrees) x 12.195 degrees = 11.919 degrees
1- How This Triangle Is Created?
- The geometrical structure uses the angle 12.195 degrees as a distance= 12.195 km,
and creates the angle (C) depends on the angle 12.195 degrees as the data shows
- So this triangle is created depending on the angle 12.195 degrees
2- This Triangle Purpose
- The triangle aims to create the hypotenuse AC = 59.06 km = 2 x 29.53 km
3- Why This Triangle Is Created?
- To create the value (29.53 km) depends on the value 12.195 degrees geometrically,
both data is the moon motion data, but the triangle tries to connect both data
geometrically, why? because Nothing is independent (the geometrical concept),
because of that, the new data should be created based on the old data, and by that
there's always one line connecting all data
This simple example is for this technique explanation.. and the rate (1km=1degree) is
used here only and not a general rate, although the value (2x 29.53) is used more
widely than (29.53) in all data. (For example, Earth during 59 days moves a distance
= its orbital distance "Error 1%" ).
67. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
67
4-5 Why The Moon Displacement Daily =88000 Km?
Earth motion distance during its day period = the moon displacements total
during its day period = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
I - Data (Old Data)
The moon orbital circumference at apogee point = 2.55 mkm (100 %)
The Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.5734 mkm (101%)
The moon total displacements during 29.53 days = 2.598 mkm (102%)
Pluto motion distance during its day (153.3 h) = 2.5938 mkm (102%)
II - Data (New Data)
(1)
Earth moves during (6939.75 solar days) a distance = 17859.325 mkm
(2)
Pluto moves during (6939.75) x (153.3 hours) a distance = 18000.57 mkm
(3)
The moon displacements total during (6939.75) x (29.53 days) = 18034.278 mkm
(4)
Uranus Orbital Circumference = 18048.449 mkm
Where 153.3 hours = Pluto day period 29.53 days = the moon day period
The moon daily displacement =88000 km
III - Data Analysis
(4) – (1) = 189.124 mkm
(4) – (2) = 47.879 mkm
(4) – (3) = 14.171 mkm
(3) – (1) = 174.953 mkm
(3) – (2) = 33.708 mkm
(2) – (1) = 141.245 mkm
- Sin (17.2) x 47.879 mkm = 14.171 mkm
- Tan (10.96) x 174.953 mkm = 33.708 mkm
- Tan (13.3) x 141.245 mkm = 33.708 mkm (error 1%)
- 0.8 x 174.953 mkm = 141.245 mkm (error 1%)
- Sin (4.63) x 174.953 mkm = 14.171 mkm
68. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
68
o 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination. Sin (4.63) =0.08
o 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination
o 13.3 degrees = The angle of (E) in the moon orbital inclination
o 10.96 degrees (Cos 10.96 degrees x 88000 km = 86400 km)
VI –Discussion
- The previous 4 angles are the basics data for their planets, let's try to show that
o 0.8 degrees = Uranus Orbital Inclination
o 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt) x 0.8 = 97.8 deg (Uranus Axial Tilt)
o Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 degrees = 0.99 x 17.4 deg (The inner planets
orbital inclinations total) … also
o Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg x 7.1 = 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt)
o 13.3 degrees is the angle of point (E) (Earth) in the moon orbital triangle
(Earth Orb. Period 365.25 d = The moon Orb. Period 27.3 d x 13.3)
o The angle 10.96 degrees is the valuable angle we have discussed deeply
where (Cos 10.96 degrees x 88000 km = 86400 km).
o Sin (4.63) = 0.08 This rate effects on the moon orbit geometrical design
There's an interaction occurred here between these 4 planets (Uranus, Pluto, Earth and
its moon), and in this interaction, these 4 basic values are created and based on these 4
values many other data of these planets is created … means, this interaction forms the
geometrical structure of these planets motions …. And if we limited our discussion
for the moon orbit structure, that lead us to conclude that, the moon orbit geometrical
structure is effected by these 4 planets motions interaction as seen in the data.
i.e.
These 4 planets motions interaction effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to
create Metonic Cycle. (this discussion should be completed with Metonic Cycle
Discussion Point No. 6)
69. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
69
4-6 The angle 71.9 degrees
- Please remember, the green line (the triangle base EA) has an angle 1.1 degrees
with the moon equator line, and an angle 0.443 degrees with the Earth Ecliptic
The angle 71.9 degrees is an angle created by the interaction between the 4 planets
Motions (Earth, its moon, Pluto and Uranus).
(Why we need to discuss this angle 71.9 degrees?)
Because this angle can answer why the moon orbital motion equation uses the
constant 1.7 degrees for the moon daily motion (θ1= θ0 +1.7 degrees).
The Figure Description
- In this moon triangle, I added CM, where the angle ECM= 49.77 degrees
- And the angle MCA = 71.9 degrees
- The angle M1 N M2 =88.9 degrees
- AM = 129630 km
- CM = 96434 km
- EM = 319370 km
- The Perimeter of the triangle (MCA) = 347684 km
70. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
70
I- Data
(1)
The angle M1 N M2 =88.9 degrees
88.9 degrees – 71.9 degrees = 17 degrees
(2)
(17 degrees /0.8) = 21.25 degrees
(3)
21.25 degrees x 0.08 = 1.7 degrees (the moon motion equation constant)
(4)
17 degrees x 1.7 degrees = 29 degrees
(5)
23.4 deg = 1.8 deg x 13.177 deg x 0.98562 deg
II- Discussion
- Equations (from 1 to 3) give us a simple geometrical method to change the value
17 degrees into 1.7 degrees, but why this method is useful?
- Because the value 21.25 degrees is one of the moon motion angles which is
- 21.25 degrees = 11.8 degrees x 1.8 degrees
- Where
- 11.8 degrees = 5.1 deg (the moon orbital inclination) +6.7 deg (the moon axial tilt)
- But what's 1.8 degrees?! Let's discover in following…
o The moon moves from perigee to apogee and return back during its orbital
period.
o The distance from perigee to apogee on the moon orbital triangle (BD)
controlled by the angle (BCD =26.56 degrees)
o The moon go and return during the cycle (26.56 degrees x 2 = 53.12 deg)
o (53.12 degrees /29.2 solar days) =1.8 degrees
o Why I divide this angle 53.12 degrees on 29.2 days?
o Because
71. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
71
o The Earth moves during 29.53 solar days 29.2 degrees
o But
o The moon moves during 29.53 solar days (360 degrees + 29.2 degrees)
- The previous explanation shows that, the angle 21.25 degrees is used in the moon
orbital motion because it depends on 2 angles (11.8 deg) and (1.8 deg) are used in
the moon day motion. based on that, the interaction between the angle 17 degrees
and 21.25 degrees can be created because both angles are used in the same motion
- Then
- The last step is to change the angle 21.25 degrees into 1.7 degrees as following
- 21.25 degrees x 0.08 = 1.7 degrees
- We remember this rate (0.08) based on which the valuable angle (10.96 deg) is
created.
Notice
- The most 3 basic values in the moon motion are (137 deg, 10.96 deg and 0.08)
- As the valuable angle (10.96 deg) is created based on this rate (0.08), the moon
orbital motion equation angle (1.7 deg) is created based on it….BUT
- Why the data shows that, Uranus orbital inclination (0.8 degrees) is used in this
process? The data uses (17 degrees /0.8 degrees) = 21.25 degrees, showing clearly
the using of Uranus orbital inclination (0.8 degrees) Why? because the data tries to
show Uranus effect on the moon orbital motion…. the next points supports it.
Equation No. (4)
17 degrees x 1.7 degrees = 29 degrees
- We know both angles 17 and 1.7 degrees but what's this 29 degrees?!
- The major lunar standstill can be +28.5 = (23.4 deg + 5.1 deg)
- The moon angular diameter = 0.5 degrees, that means, when the moon orbital
inclination is measured above the moon diameter it will be =5.6 degrees
- So the angle 28.55 degrees +0.5 degrees = 29.05 degrees
72. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
72
- That shows Uranus effect on the moon motion during Metonic Cycle, which effect
on the moon daily orbital motion and effect on the moon motion equation by the
constant (1.7 degrees)
Equation No. (5)
23.4 deg = 1.8 deg x 13.177 deg x 0.98562 deg
Where
23.45 deg = Earth Axial Tilt 0.98562 deg = Earth motion daily degrees
13.177 deg = the moon daily motion degrees
1.8 degrees = is the angle we have discussed in the previous equation (no.3), the
angle of the moon motion from perigee to apogee during its day period (52.6/29.2)
Equation no. (6) shows that Earth axial tilt is created depending on the moon motion.
Planets Effect on Data
(1)
- Uranus (6.8 km/sec) moves during 51118 seconds a distance = 347603 km
- This distance = the triangle (MCA) perimeter accurately, showing Uranus effect
on the moon orbital geometrical structure by using the angle 71.9 degrees.
(2)
- Tan (71.9 deg) x 43000 km = 129630 km (error 1.5%)
- Where 43000 km = Perigee Apogee Distance and AM =129630 km
(3)
- 17 degrees = 0.99 x 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination)
- But , 17.2 degrees = 0.99 x 17.4 degrees (the inner planets orbital inclinations total)
- Also, 23.4 degrees = 0.99 x 23.6 degrees (the outer planets orbital inclinations total)
Notice
The angle 71.9 degrees is a very rich angle and the previous discussion is a small part
of it, for that, this discussion should be completed with Meronic Cycle Discussion
Point .6 and Uranus Motion analysis Point no. 7.
under the title ("The Interaction Angle 71.9 degrees" Continued)
73. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
73
4-7 The Perpendicular Line BC (=86000 km)
- Let's summarize how this triangle idea is created in following:
o Uranus Axial Tilt =97.8 deg and the Earth Moon Axial Tilt =6.7 deg. So
between them (97.8 – 6.7 = 91.1 degrees)
o The number 91.1 degrees gives a reference for some perpendicularity
between the moon axial tilt and Uranus axial tilt, but there's 1.1 deg!
o So, the solution was to decline the triangle base (EA) with 1.1 degrees on
the horizontal level and by that Uranus axial tilt will be perpendicular on the
triangle base (AE) if this triangle based depends on the moon axial tilt…
o This is the original idea of this triangle
o For that reason the line BC is perpendicular on the moon orbital triangle
- Based on this description
- The line BC shows Uranus motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- In Metonic Cycle Discussion we should discuss more effects done by this line BC
on the moon orbital motion trying to prove that Uranus Motion effect on the orbtial
motion is a real effect.