The iterative engagement between curation and evaluation in an open research project: A utilization-focused approach Presentation for the AVU Conference 1-3 July 2015 by Sarah Goodier
Ethics, Openness and the Future of LearningRobert Farrow
What difference does openness make to ethics' This session will examine this question both from the perspective of research into OER and the use of open resources in teaching and learning. An outline of the nature and importance of ethics will be provided before the basic principles of research ethics are outlined through an examination of the guidance provided by National Institutes of Health (2014) and BERA (2014). The importance and foundation of institutional approval for OER research activities is reiterated with a focus on underlying principles that can also be applied openly.
I argue that with a shift to informal (or extra-institutional) learning there is a risk that we lose some clarity over the nature and extent of our moral obligations when working outside institutional frameworks – what Weller (2013) has termed "guerilla" research activity. Innovations of this kind could be free of licensing permissions; they could be funded by kickstarter or public-private enterprise; or they could reflect individuals working as data journalists. But we might also speak of "guerilla" education for innovations taking place on the fringes of institutional activity – from using social media to going full-blown "edupunk" (Groom, 2008). These innovations which employ variants of opennesss can also bring out morally complex situations.
I show how the principles underlying traditional research ethics can be applied openly while noting that, whether working within or outside institutions, there is almost no existing guidance that explains the ethical implications of working openly. Similar issues are raised with MOOC, which operate outside institutions but while drawing on institutional reputations and values. With this in mind I sketch out scenarios we are likely to encounter in the future of education:
- Issues around privacy, security and big data
- Intellectual property conflicts
- Ensuring fair treatment of class students and equivalent online students
- Meeting obligations to content creators
- The ethical status of MOOCs and their obligations to their students
- Moral dimensions of open licenses
- The ethics of learning analytics and the data it produces
I argue that, while models for ethical analysis have been proposed (e.g. Farrow, 2011) more attention should be paid to the ethics of being open. I conclude with an examination of the idea that we have a moral obligation to be open, contrasting prudential and ethical approaches to open education. At the heart of the OER movement, I argue, is a strong moral impulse that should be recognized and celebrated rather than considered the preserve of the ideologue: openness is not reducible to lowering the marginal cost of educational resources. Openness is a diverse spectrum and to leverage its true potential we need to reflect deeply on how technology has the power to challenge the normative assumptions we make about education.
Community College Consortium for OER Panel: Increasing Student Retention and ...Una Daly
Presentation at the Online Teaching Conference Jun 18, 2015 in San Diego, CA:
The cost of textbooks has been identified as a major barrier for students completing their education. Colleges seeking to increase student retention and success are promoting the use of open educational resources and open textbooks to reduce costs and improve pedagogy. A key strategy for college adoption campaigns has been participating in communities of practice. Members of the Community College Consortium for OER (CCCOER) will share their best practices and other tactics for nurturing a national community of practice focused on open education.
Etienne Wenger defines communities of practice as “groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.” With over 250 member colleges in 19 states and provinces, CCCOER encourages collaboration between members and invites OER project presentations at monthly online meetings. Experienced members advise those who are just getting started on OER and best practices are freely shared. Access to a community of college OER experts through our advisory listserve allows new members to quickly find and adopt the highest quality OER available. Meetups at regional and national conferences provide an opportunity to share and promote the OER adoption successes of our members with colleagues in higher education.
Hear from this panel of OER experts about how they promote open textbooks and OER adoption at their colleges:
Una Daly, Director of CCCOER and Curriculum Design at the Open Education Consortium. Panel facilitator.
Katie Datko: Interim Associate Dean of Distance Education and Instructional Designer, Pasadena City College.
James Glapa-Grossklag, Dean of Educational Technology, Learning Resources, and Distance Learning, College of the Canyons, President of CCCOER Advisory
Barbara Illowsky: Dean of Basic Skills & OER, CCC Online Ed Initiative and Mathematics professor at De Anza College.
Cherylee Kushida: Distance Education Coordinator and Computer Science professor at Santa Ana College.
Ramirez-Montoya (2020) recently presented a review of literature pertaining OER and educational innovation, noting that although definitions of openness vary across sectoral spaces, the crossover between openness and innovation is an area of increasing interest. A core part of the story of open educational resources is that they can be used to create spaces for innovation in teaching and learning (Orr et al., 2015; Pitt & Smyth, 2017; Weller et al., 2015). As Coughlan et al. (2018) argue, there has been a lack of detailed analysis of the specific function of OER as a driver of innovation, and a single model has not yet captured the multi-faceted relationship between openness and innovation.
This presentation will present an overview of several major theories of innovation as they relate to contexts of open education, making clear connections to open educational practice and showing how innovation theories can apply to OER. The presentation is likely to be of interest to practitioners wishing to have a stronger theoretical and practical understanding of how OER can support innovative practice.
• Task-Artefact Cycle (Carroll, Kellog & Rosson, 1991)
• The diffusion of innovations theory (Rogers, 2010)
• SAMR framework (Puentedura, 2006; Orr et al., 2015)
• Cyclic Innovation Model (Berkhout, 2007)
• Forms of innovation in OER (Coughlan, Pitt & Farrow, 2018)
This work contributes to the European Network for Catalysing Open Resources in Education (ENCORE+). ENCORE+ is a pan-European Knowledge Alliance funded under the Erasmus+ programme. The project will run from 2021 to 2023 to support the modernisation of education in the European area through OER.
Ethics, Openness and the Future of LearningRobert Farrow
What difference does openness make to ethics' This session will examine this question both from the perspective of research into OER and the use of open resources in teaching and learning. An outline of the nature and importance of ethics will be provided before the basic principles of research ethics are outlined through an examination of the guidance provided by National Institutes of Health (2014) and BERA (2014). The importance and foundation of institutional approval for OER research activities is reiterated with a focus on underlying principles that can also be applied openly.
I argue that with a shift to informal (or extra-institutional) learning there is a risk that we lose some clarity over the nature and extent of our moral obligations when working outside institutional frameworks – what Weller (2013) has termed "guerilla" research activity. Innovations of this kind could be free of licensing permissions; they could be funded by kickstarter or public-private enterprise; or they could reflect individuals working as data journalists. But we might also speak of "guerilla" education for innovations taking place on the fringes of institutional activity – from using social media to going full-blown "edupunk" (Groom, 2008). These innovations which employ variants of opennesss can also bring out morally complex situations.
I show how the principles underlying traditional research ethics can be applied openly while noting that, whether working within or outside institutions, there is almost no existing guidance that explains the ethical implications of working openly. Similar issues are raised with MOOC, which operate outside institutions but while drawing on institutional reputations and values. With this in mind I sketch out scenarios we are likely to encounter in the future of education:
- Issues around privacy, security and big data
- Intellectual property conflicts
- Ensuring fair treatment of class students and equivalent online students
- Meeting obligations to content creators
- The ethical status of MOOCs and their obligations to their students
- Moral dimensions of open licenses
- The ethics of learning analytics and the data it produces
I argue that, while models for ethical analysis have been proposed (e.g. Farrow, 2011) more attention should be paid to the ethics of being open. I conclude with an examination of the idea that we have a moral obligation to be open, contrasting prudential and ethical approaches to open education. At the heart of the OER movement, I argue, is a strong moral impulse that should be recognized and celebrated rather than considered the preserve of the ideologue: openness is not reducible to lowering the marginal cost of educational resources. Openness is a diverse spectrum and to leverage its true potential we need to reflect deeply on how technology has the power to challenge the normative assumptions we make about education.
Community College Consortium for OER Panel: Increasing Student Retention and ...Una Daly
Presentation at the Online Teaching Conference Jun 18, 2015 in San Diego, CA:
The cost of textbooks has been identified as a major barrier for students completing their education. Colleges seeking to increase student retention and success are promoting the use of open educational resources and open textbooks to reduce costs and improve pedagogy. A key strategy for college adoption campaigns has been participating in communities of practice. Members of the Community College Consortium for OER (CCCOER) will share their best practices and other tactics for nurturing a national community of practice focused on open education.
Etienne Wenger defines communities of practice as “groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.” With over 250 member colleges in 19 states and provinces, CCCOER encourages collaboration between members and invites OER project presentations at monthly online meetings. Experienced members advise those who are just getting started on OER and best practices are freely shared. Access to a community of college OER experts through our advisory listserve allows new members to quickly find and adopt the highest quality OER available. Meetups at regional and national conferences provide an opportunity to share and promote the OER adoption successes of our members with colleagues in higher education.
Hear from this panel of OER experts about how they promote open textbooks and OER adoption at their colleges:
Una Daly, Director of CCCOER and Curriculum Design at the Open Education Consortium. Panel facilitator.
Katie Datko: Interim Associate Dean of Distance Education and Instructional Designer, Pasadena City College.
James Glapa-Grossklag, Dean of Educational Technology, Learning Resources, and Distance Learning, College of the Canyons, President of CCCOER Advisory
Barbara Illowsky: Dean of Basic Skills & OER, CCC Online Ed Initiative and Mathematics professor at De Anza College.
Cherylee Kushida: Distance Education Coordinator and Computer Science professor at Santa Ana College.
Ramirez-Montoya (2020) recently presented a review of literature pertaining OER and educational innovation, noting that although definitions of openness vary across sectoral spaces, the crossover between openness and innovation is an area of increasing interest. A core part of the story of open educational resources is that they can be used to create spaces for innovation in teaching and learning (Orr et al., 2015; Pitt & Smyth, 2017; Weller et al., 2015). As Coughlan et al. (2018) argue, there has been a lack of detailed analysis of the specific function of OER as a driver of innovation, and a single model has not yet captured the multi-faceted relationship between openness and innovation.
This presentation will present an overview of several major theories of innovation as they relate to contexts of open education, making clear connections to open educational practice and showing how innovation theories can apply to OER. The presentation is likely to be of interest to practitioners wishing to have a stronger theoretical and practical understanding of how OER can support innovative practice.
• Task-Artefact Cycle (Carroll, Kellog & Rosson, 1991)
• The diffusion of innovations theory (Rogers, 2010)
• SAMR framework (Puentedura, 2006; Orr et al., 2015)
• Cyclic Innovation Model (Berkhout, 2007)
• Forms of innovation in OER (Coughlan, Pitt & Farrow, 2018)
This work contributes to the European Network for Catalysing Open Resources in Education (ENCORE+). ENCORE+ is a pan-European Knowledge Alliance funded under the Erasmus+ programme. The project will run from 2021 to 2023 to support the modernisation of education in the European area through OER.
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ...ROER4D
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji and Sarah Goodier
ROER4D Communications and Evaluation Advisors
Presentation for DECI-2 workshop
Cape Town, 4 May 2016
The Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN): Engaging Doctoral Research with Open...Robert Farrow
This workshop was led by the Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN) team (http://go-gn.net/). GO-GN is a network of PhD candidates around the world whose research projects include a focus on open education. These doctoral researchers are at the core of the network while around them, experts, supervisors, mentors and interested parties connect to form a community of practice. Considering the growth of open research and the commitment of research funders to follow this approach, there is a need to understand what open research practices imply. This involves understanding the benefits and challenges of making research more visible to increase impact and opportunities for collaboration with other researchers when doing a PhD and when pursuing a career in academia.
The workshop will focus on introducing the network possibilities for PhD students, including worldwide support to those researching in the different areas of open education. We will expose the values of the network promoting equity and inclusion in the field of open education research and introduce the different types of events we host such as an annual face-to-face workshop and online events. As well, we will discuss the support for alumni and members with a funded fellowship scheme and the acknowledgement of our members’ achievements through our annual awards. At the second part of the workshop, we will have a practical exercise with the audience to promote the co-authoring of research publications with our members. Two examples of those which will be disclosed are the research methods handbook, awarded with the 2020 Open Education Award for Excellence Winner, and the Research Review Summer 2020.
Engaging with audiences early: the role of social media and networks in deve...ROER4D
Engaging with audiences early:
the role of social media and networks in developing a communications strategy for a global research project
Association of Business Communications (ABC) Regional Conference, Cape Town,
6-8 Jan 2016
Developing a communications strategy for ROER4D - insights for the South Afri...ROER4D
Developing a communications strategy for ROER4D - insights for the South African Institute for Distance Education
Seminar presented by Sukaina Walji, 22 May, 2017, Johannesburg
Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D p...ROER4D
Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project
Thomas King, Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams, Michelle Willmers, Sukaina Walji
University of Cape Town
OE Global Conference 2016, 14-16 April, Krakow, Poland
Uncovering what enables and constrains 'open practices' in the Global South: ...ROER4D
Uncovering what enables and constrains 'open practices' in the Global South: Reflections from the ROER4D Project. Keynote for the AVU Conference 1-3 July 2015 by Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Innovation with Open Educational Resources: The State of the ArtRobert Farrow
Keynote presentation at the OpenLang Network Multiplier Event, 10th December 2021. This presentation reflects on more than a decade of innovation in open education.
Scoping: The GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks Robert Farrow
Slides from a webinar on the forthcoming GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks. This presentation discusses the rationale for a Handbook to guide doctoral students and reviews some literature on theories, theoretical frameworks, conceptual frameworks, models, and other constructs. This webinar is part of the scoping process for a forthcoming publication.
Slides presented at Open Education 2016. The Open Research Agenda is an international consultation exercise on research priorities in open education which combines online surveys and focus group interactions. This presentation summarises thematic analysis of the data set and indicates future directions for research in the field of open education.
A introduction and overview of Open Educational Resources (OER): what they are; how open licences work; how OER are used; and how they support innovation
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams' Keynote presentation slides for 2nd Regional Symposium on Open Educational Resources (OER). Presentation title: Degrees of ease: Adoption of OER, Open Textbooks and MOOCs in the Global South
Making MOOCs and changing open educational practicesROER4D
Making MOOCs and changing open educational practices
Laura Czerniewicz, Andrew Deacon, Sukaina Walji, Michael Glover
9 March 2017
Presentation at Open Education Global Conference 2017
Research methods in open education: insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...Robert Farrow
Presentation from the ALT Summer Summit 2020 describes the GO-GN Research Methods Handbook which supports researchers working in the field of open education
Critical issues in contemporary open education researchRobert Farrow
This presentation outlines some key considerations for researchers working in the fields of open education, OER and MOOC. Key lines of debate in the open education movement will be described and critically assessed. A reflective overview of the award-winning OER Research Hub project will be used to frame several key considerations around the methodology and purpose of OER research (including 'impact' and 'open practices'). These will be compared with results from a 2016 OER Hub consultation with key stakeholders in the open education movement on research priorities for the sector. The presentation will conclude with thoughts on the potential for openness to act as a disruptive force in higher education.
The Potential Contribution of Open Educational Resources to e-Learning and Di...ROER4D
The Potential Contribution of Open Educational Resources
to e-Learning and Distance Education.
A/Prof Patricia B. Arinto
3rd e-Learning and Distance Education Conference
Lahore, Pakistan, 14-15 March 2016
ROER4D Update March 2016 - Presentation to the Hewlett FoundationROER4D
Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) in the Global South:
Update March 2016
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams with the ROER4D team's presentation to the Hewlett Foundation, UCT, Cape Town
14 March 2016
The growing adoption of open educational resources (OER) has identified the need for easy-to-use authoring platforms for the development and delivery of openly licensed digital content. Please join the Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources (CCCOER) for this free, open webinar on authoring platforms that support faculty authoring and adaption of open educational resources and institutional delivery of these resources.
Our speakers will share platforms used by faculty to develop open textbooks and deliver openly licensed digital content to faculty and students in an easy and accessible manner.
Date: Wednesday, April 8
Time: 10 am PST; 1:00 pm EST
Featured speakers:
Clint Lalonde, Open Education Manager, BCcampus
Judy Einstein, VP Business Development and Etienne Pelaprat, User Experience Director, Courseload Inc.
Domi Enders, Founder and CEO, Open Assembly
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ...ROER4D
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji and Sarah Goodier
ROER4D Communications and Evaluation Advisors
Presentation for DECI-2 workshop
Cape Town, 4 May 2016
The Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN): Engaging Doctoral Research with Open...Robert Farrow
This workshop was led by the Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN) team (http://go-gn.net/). GO-GN is a network of PhD candidates around the world whose research projects include a focus on open education. These doctoral researchers are at the core of the network while around them, experts, supervisors, mentors and interested parties connect to form a community of practice. Considering the growth of open research and the commitment of research funders to follow this approach, there is a need to understand what open research practices imply. This involves understanding the benefits and challenges of making research more visible to increase impact and opportunities for collaboration with other researchers when doing a PhD and when pursuing a career in academia.
The workshop will focus on introducing the network possibilities for PhD students, including worldwide support to those researching in the different areas of open education. We will expose the values of the network promoting equity and inclusion in the field of open education research and introduce the different types of events we host such as an annual face-to-face workshop and online events. As well, we will discuss the support for alumni and members with a funded fellowship scheme and the acknowledgement of our members’ achievements through our annual awards. At the second part of the workshop, we will have a practical exercise with the audience to promote the co-authoring of research publications with our members. Two examples of those which will be disclosed are the research methods handbook, awarded with the 2020 Open Education Award for Excellence Winner, and the Research Review Summer 2020.
Engaging with audiences early: the role of social media and networks in deve...ROER4D
Engaging with audiences early:
the role of social media and networks in developing a communications strategy for a global research project
Association of Business Communications (ABC) Regional Conference, Cape Town,
6-8 Jan 2016
Developing a communications strategy for ROER4D - insights for the South Afri...ROER4D
Developing a communications strategy for ROER4D - insights for the South African Institute for Distance Education
Seminar presented by Sukaina Walji, 22 May, 2017, Johannesburg
Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D p...ROER4D
Dimensions of open research: critical reflections on openness in the ROER4D project
Thomas King, Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams, Michelle Willmers, Sukaina Walji
University of Cape Town
OE Global Conference 2016, 14-16 April, Krakow, Poland
Uncovering what enables and constrains 'open practices' in the Global South: ...ROER4D
Uncovering what enables and constrains 'open practices' in the Global South: Reflections from the ROER4D Project. Keynote for the AVU Conference 1-3 July 2015 by Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Innovation with Open Educational Resources: The State of the ArtRobert Farrow
Keynote presentation at the OpenLang Network Multiplier Event, 10th December 2021. This presentation reflects on more than a decade of innovation in open education.
Scoping: The GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks Robert Farrow
Slides from a webinar on the forthcoming GO-GN Guide to Conceptual Frameworks. This presentation discusses the rationale for a Handbook to guide doctoral students and reviews some literature on theories, theoretical frameworks, conceptual frameworks, models, and other constructs. This webinar is part of the scoping process for a forthcoming publication.
Slides presented at Open Education 2016. The Open Research Agenda is an international consultation exercise on research priorities in open education which combines online surveys and focus group interactions. This presentation summarises thematic analysis of the data set and indicates future directions for research in the field of open education.
A introduction and overview of Open Educational Resources (OER): what they are; how open licences work; how OER are used; and how they support innovation
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams' Keynote presentation slides for 2nd Regional Symposium on Open Educational Resources (OER). Presentation title: Degrees of ease: Adoption of OER, Open Textbooks and MOOCs in the Global South
Making MOOCs and changing open educational practicesROER4D
Making MOOCs and changing open educational practices
Laura Czerniewicz, Andrew Deacon, Sukaina Walji, Michael Glover
9 March 2017
Presentation at Open Education Global Conference 2017
Research methods in open education: insights from the Global OER Graduate Ne...Robert Farrow
Presentation from the ALT Summer Summit 2020 describes the GO-GN Research Methods Handbook which supports researchers working in the field of open education
Critical issues in contemporary open education researchRobert Farrow
This presentation outlines some key considerations for researchers working in the fields of open education, OER and MOOC. Key lines of debate in the open education movement will be described and critically assessed. A reflective overview of the award-winning OER Research Hub project will be used to frame several key considerations around the methodology and purpose of OER research (including 'impact' and 'open practices'). These will be compared with results from a 2016 OER Hub consultation with key stakeholders in the open education movement on research priorities for the sector. The presentation will conclude with thoughts on the potential for openness to act as a disruptive force in higher education.
The Potential Contribution of Open Educational Resources to e-Learning and Di...ROER4D
The Potential Contribution of Open Educational Resources
to e-Learning and Distance Education.
A/Prof Patricia B. Arinto
3rd e-Learning and Distance Education Conference
Lahore, Pakistan, 14-15 March 2016
ROER4D Update March 2016 - Presentation to the Hewlett FoundationROER4D
Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) in the Global South:
Update March 2016
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams with the ROER4D team's presentation to the Hewlett Foundation, UCT, Cape Town
14 March 2016
The growing adoption of open educational resources (OER) has identified the need for easy-to-use authoring platforms for the development and delivery of openly licensed digital content. Please join the Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources (CCCOER) for this free, open webinar on authoring platforms that support faculty authoring and adaption of open educational resources and institutional delivery of these resources.
Our speakers will share platforms used by faculty to develop open textbooks and deliver openly licensed digital content to faculty and students in an easy and accessible manner.
Date: Wednesday, April 8
Time: 10 am PST; 1:00 pm EST
Featured speakers:
Clint Lalonde, Open Education Manager, BCcampus
Judy Einstein, VP Business Development and Etienne Pelaprat, User Experience Director, Courseload Inc.
Domi Enders, Founder and CEO, Open Assembly
UCT, Fort Hare or UNISA: Which university is OER ready?ROER4D
UCT, Fort Hare or UNISA: Which university is OER ready? Presentation at UCT Teaching and Learning Conference 2015/16
Glenda Cox & Henry Trotter
30 March 2016
Working a conference: a presentation from ROER4DROER4D
Working a conference. A presentation from the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) in the Global South project. Author: Sukaina Walji, ROER4D Communications Advisor.
Understanding "Openness" in Research on Open Educational Resources: Deliberat...ROER4D
Understanding "Openness" in Research on Open Educational Resources: Deliberations of the ROER4D Project
Presentation for eLearning Africa, 10th International Conference on ICT for Development, Education & Training, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 20-22 May 2015
Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) in the Globa...ROER4D
Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) in the Global South:
An overview for Dutch HBO-I Academic Visit to the University of Cape Town on March 2015
OER in and as MOOCs: impact on Educators’ practices in African-developed high...ROER4D
Presentation for OER15, Cardiff, 14 April 2014. OER in and as MOOCs: impact on Educators’ practices in African-developed higher education courses.
This is a ROER4D Impact Study (sub-project 10.3). The impact studies are researching In what ways, and under what circumstances can OER adoption impact upon the increasing demand for accessible, relevant, high-quality, and affordable education in the Global South?
ROER4D Cape Town Workshop Overview 9 Dec 2013ROER4D
Overview of 1st ROER4D Workshop by Professor Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams held 9 December 2013. ROER4D is a Research project on Open Educational Resources for Development in the Global South, focussing on post-secondary education. The project is funded by the IDRC, Canada and hosted at the University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa.
Open Education for a Multicultural World:
A report from the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project
in the Global South
Copyright & Creative Commons: with regards to Open Educational Resources (OER) ROER4D
Presentation: Copyright & Creative Commons: with regards to Open Educational Resources (OER). By: Glenda Cox
Delivered at the University of South Africa (UNISA) on 18 March 2015
Openness in Education: Teacher perspectives through Concept MappingROER4D
Openness in Education: Teacher perspectives through Concept Mapping
Presentation at the 29th AAOU Conference-2015 -30 November - 03 December, 2015, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
S. P. Karunanayaka, S. Naidu, S. Kugamoorthy, A. Ariyaratne,L.R. Gonsalkorala, T.D.T.L. Dhanapala
Open educational practices and resources in the Global South: Recommendations...ROER4D
Open educational practices and resources in the Global South: Recommendations for government from the ROER4D project
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Africa Regional Consultation on OER, 2-3 Mar 2017, Mauritius
How and where to find Open Educational Resoures (OER)ROER4D
How and Where to find Open Educational Resources (OER)
Presentation by Henry Trotter
Delivered at the University of South Africa (UNISA) on 18 March 2015
MOOCs and open practices Teaching and Learning 2016 MG abridgedmichaelgloveresearch
Michael Glover presentation at Teaching and Learning Conference, 30 March, University of Cape Town, 2016. Link to research project: http://roer4d.org/sp10-3-impact-of-oer-in-and-as-moocs-in-south-africa
The adoption and impact of OEP and OER in the Global South: Theoretical, conc...ROER4D
The adoption and impact of OEP and OER in the Global South: Theoretical, conceptual & methodological framework for the ROER4D project meta-synthesis
Presentation at Open Education Global 2017
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
OER, Open Access and Scholarship in Portuguese Higher EducationPaula Cardoso
Presentation at OpenEd14, Washington, November 19-21, 2014.
PhD research at the Open University of Lisbon, supported by GO-GN (Global OER Graduate Network).
Evaluating an open research project: Benefits and challenges from the ROER4D ...SarahG_SS
Presentation made at the Open Education Global 2017 Conference held at the CTICC from 8-10 March 2017. This presentation looked at the the evaluation of the ROER4D project, a project that is committed to open research. The open approach in the project work informed the evaluation approach used and has highlighted considerations around the ethical sharing of evaluation findings and outputs, including at which stage and with whom. Some of the benefits and challenges of evaluating such an open project are presented.
Researching OER in the Open: developments and deliberations in the ROER4D pro...ROER4D
Researching OER in the Open: developments and deliberations in the ROER4D project.
Seminar for Centre for Higher Education Development (CHED) Research Seminar series, University of Cape Town
9 March 2016
A/Prof Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
ROER4D Overview Brown Bag Session for CILT 6 March 2014v6finalROER4D
An overview of ROER4D's activities presented to colleagues at the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching at the University of Cape Town. ROER4D is a Research project on Open Educational Resources for Development in the Global South. The project is funded by the IDRC, Canada and hosted at the University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa.
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the R...SarahG_SS
A joint presentation given at the DECI-2 Workshop held in Cape Town on 3-5 May 2016. This presentation briefly outlines the ROER4D project and then briefly explores the evaluation and communications strategy. This presentation also gives feedback to the DECI-2 project on what worked and some sugestions for improvement in their mentoring process of the ROER4D project.
Reviews the role of digital repositories in relation to the broader UK digital information environment, picks up on highlights, issues and trends. Intended to steer the work of JISC and others interested in furthering enhanced scholarly communication.
‘Open, ready and agile’: Developing a communications strategy for the Researc...ROER4D
Open, ready and agile: developing a communications strategy for the ROER4D project. Presented by Sukaina Walji at Open Education Global Conference 2015, Banff, Alberta
23 April 2015.
Mol, S.T. (2014, November). Learning Analytics: The good, the bad, the ugly. Presentation delivered as part of the UvA Faculty of Economics and Business Educational Innovation Seminar Series. University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Research, researchers, and research data management. Session 1.2 of the RDMRose v3 materials.
The JISC funded RDMRose project (June 2012-May 2013) was a collaboration between the libraries of the University of Leeds, Sheffield and York, with the Information School at Sheffield to provide an Open Educational Resource for information professionals on Research Data Management. The materials were revised between November 2014 and February 2015 for the consortium of North West Academic Libraries (NoWAL).
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/is/research/projects/rdmrose
Creating a UK-wide network of LIS researchersHazel Hall
Presentation delivered at the Library Research Symposium. McMaster University, Canada, 3 November 2015.
The aim of the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded Developing Research Excellence and Methods project, was to develop a formal UK-wide network of Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers (academic and practitioner). The project ran from January 2011 to August 2012, and was supported by the UK Library and Information Science Research Coalition.
The initial successes of the DREaM project were reported in a paper that Hazel Hall co-authored with Alison Brettle and Charles Oppenheim and presented at QQML 2012. Three years later in summer 2015, Hall and her colleague Bruce Ryan conducted further research to explore any lasting impacts of the project.
Those who attended three DREaM research methods workshops in 2011/12 were invited to complete a survey in June 2015. The survey questions focused on LIS work undertaken since the last DREaM workshop in April 2012. Respondents were asked to report on the use of the methods presented at the DREaM workshops; any new DREaM-inspired LIS research and publications, and their impacts; the influence of DREaM on individual career paths; and any on-going contact between those who developed relationships with one another over the course of the three workshops. Further data for the 2015 project – known as DREaM Again - were collected formally from focus groups and more informally through email contact with DREaM workshop participants.
In this presentation the main findings of DREaM Again are discussed.
Developing an evaluation strategy to gain insights into the ROER4D multi-nati...SarahG_SS
Presentation at the OE Global Conference held in Banff, Canada in April 2015. This presentation introduces the development of the evaluation strategy, using Utilization Focused Evaluation (UFE), for the ROER4D Project (http://roer4d.org/).
You can access the abstract here: http://conference.oeconsortium.org/2015/presentation/developing-an-evaluation-strategy-to-gain-insights-into-a-multi-national-project-roer4d/
The Ecology of Sharing: Synthesizing OER ResearchRobert Farrow
Arguably, Open Educational Resources (OER) are starting to enter the mainstream, though some fundamental questions about their value and impact remain to be answered or supported with appropriate evidence. Much early OER activity was driven by ideals and interest in finding new ways to release content, with less direct research and reflection on the process. Furthermore, the majority of OER studies are localised, making extrapolation problematic. At the same time there are considerable practical experiences and ideas that it would be valuable to share. This presentation introduces the 'hub' as metaphor for the kind of networked research that is needed by the OER movement. The Open University's OER Research Hub project (2012-2014) works across eight primary research collaborations augmented with additional fellowships and connections with organisation to collate and synthesize research into OER across a range of sectors and stakeholders (k12, College Entry, Higher Education, Informal). The guiding research hypotheses are grounded in preparatory work in discourse analysis and collective intelligence as part of the OLnet project (which was previously presented at OER12). We then describe the research methodology for OER Research Hub, showing how claims about 'openness' may be validated in different contexts. The argument presented is that through (1) integrating and co-ordinating research methods and (2) developing open data policies it is possible to build an evidence base for the kinds of claims that the OER movement wants to make. Thus, through an 'ecology of sharing' researchers can build and participate in a research network that is greater than the sum of its parts. We will also show how this is working in practice by highlighting some of the activities that are taking place within some collaborations, showing how harmonizing the questions we ask in surveys and interviews across the different collaborations enhances our ability to make both comparative claims which apply in the broadest range of educational contexts.
Open Educational Resources (OER) challenge the current storylines that steer higher education and publishers’ business models by providing students with access to alternative learning resources other than the traditional textbook or lecturer-generated teaching materials. To what extent students take up the opportunity to search for and find OER that are sufficiently authoritative and current to be considered worthwhile and suitably relevant to their context to be considered useful, is yet to be established in the Global South. Likewise it is also not fully understood to what degree lecturers take the time to explore the Internet to locate existing teaching materials to compare these to their own materials, to legally reuse, revise, remix and redistribute educational resources, and/or to contribute their original materials for others to reuse in specified ways. In fact it is not yet known to what extent students and lecturers are even aware of OER and how they are different from any other materials available on the Internet, let alone how they may practically access these materials in geographically remote or connectivity poor environments in countries in the Global South. Least of all, we have insufficient evidence about the actual impact of OER in the Global South on informal and formal students’ satisfaction or performance or lecturers’ pedagogical practices even though these benefits are widely touted.
Similar to The iterative engagement between curation and evaluation in an open research project: A utilization-focused approach (20)
This presentation draws from the experiences of the Research in Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project in discussing how open textbooks can address the demands for curriculum transformation and decolonialisation in South African higher education.
This presentation explores the meta-synthesis process undertaken in the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project through Archer's (2003) social realist theoretical perspective.
This presentation at OE Global 2018 discusses open educational resource and open eductional practice activities and projects in the Global South under Gidden's (2010) social inclusivity lens, with an eye to answering the question "Whether, why, and how do OEP and OER contribute to the social inclusion of underserved communities in the Global South?" It explores the idea that although OER and OEP may widen access to materials, they may also have an unintended consequence of reinforcing epistemic dependency on Global North pedagogies and theories.
The role of OER and OEP in promoting social inclusion in the Global SouthROER4D
This presentation explores whether or not Open Educational Resources and Open Educational Practices can be said to promote social inclusion in the Global South.
Factors enabling and constraining OER adoption and Open Education Practices: ...ROER4D
Factors enabling and constraining OER adoption and Open Education Practices: lessons from the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji & Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Centre for Innovation in Learning & Teaching, University of Cape Town
Presentation at World Conference for Online Learning,
Toronto, Canada, 15-19 October 2017
National, Provincial and Institutional Policy Influence on the Adoption of OE...ROER4D
National, Provincial and Institutional Policy Influence on the Adoption of OER in the Global South
Henry Trotter & Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
ICDE2017 / 17 October 2017 / Toronto, Canada
Degrees of social inclusion: Emerging insights from the ROER4D projectROER4D
Degrees of social inclusion: Emerging insights from the ROER4D project
Henry Trotter & Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Open Education 2017 / 12 October 2017 / Anaheim, CA, USA
Degrees of social inclusion: Perspectives from the ROER4D projectROER4D
Degrees of social inclusion: Perspectives from the ROER4D project
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams & Henry Trotter
2nd World OER Congress, 19 September 2017, Slovenia
The influence of institutional culture on lecturers’ agency in relation to OE...ROER4D
The influence of institutional culture on lecturers’ agency in relation to OER contribution.
Presentation at OER17, London, April 2017
Glenda Cox and Henry Trotter
Understanding the nature of OEP for OER adoption in Global South contexts: Em...ROER4D
Understanding the nature of OEP for OER adoption in Global South contexts: Emerging lessons from the ROER4D project
Presentation at OER17 London 5-6 April 2017
Sukaina Walji & Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
OER and OEP towards Equitable and Quality Education for AllROER4D
OER and OEP towards Equitable and Quality Education for All
Patricia B. Arinto
University of the Philippines - Open University
Open Education Global Conference, Cape Town, 8-10 March 2017
Development of the Open Educational Practices Impact Evaluation IndexROER4D
Development of the Open Educational Practices Impact Evaluation Index
Som Naidu
Monash University, Australia
Shironica P. Karunanayaka
The Open University of Sri Lanka
Open Education Global Conference 207
OER-INTEGRATED TEACHING AND LEARNING IN A POST-WAR NORTHERN SRI LANKAROER4D
OER-INTEGRATED TEACHING AND LEARNING
IN A POST-WAR NORTHERN SRI LANKA
Sasikala Kugamoorthy, M. Rajini, Shironica P. Karunanayaka and Som Naidu
The Open University of Sri Lanka
Monash University, Australia
Presentation at Open Education Global 2017
Exploring the cultural-historical factors influencing OER adoption in Mongoli...ROER4D
Exploring the cultural-historical factors influencing OER adoption in Mongolia’s higher education sector
Batbold Zagdragchaa & Henry Trotter
OE Global Conference 2017 Cape Town : 9 March 2017
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
The iterative engagement between curation and evaluation in an open research project: A utilization-focused approach
1. Sarah Goodier
Thomas King
Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
ROER4D Project, Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching,
University of Cape Town
2nd International Conference of the AVU
2 July 2015
The iterative engagement between curation and
evaluation in an open research project:
A utilization-focused approach
7/3/20151
2. Curation in research
Curation of research – usually commercial
e.g. journal articles; book chapters
Move towards researching in the open:
practice of releasing interim or draft outputs, early
data sets and project planning documents during the
course of project activity
Change in types of research products
being shared and when as well as ways of
engaging with these research products
3. in the Global South
In what ways, and under what circumstances can the adoption of OER
address the increasing demand for accessible, relevant, high-quality
and affordable education and what is its impact in the Global South?
Researching in the open
The case of ROER4D:
Research on OER for Development
4. 1. Build an empirical knowledge base on the
use and impact of OER in education
2. Develop the capacity of OER researchers
3. Build a network of OER scholars
4. Communicate research to inform
education policy and practice
5. Curate output as open content
ROER4D Objectives
5. 1. Build an empirical knowledge base on the
use and impact of OER in education
2. Develop the capacity of OER researchers
3. Build a network of OER scholars
4. Communicate research to inform
education policy and practice
5. Curate output as open content
ROER4D Key Evaluation Areas
EVALUATION
Using Utilization
Focused Evaluation
(UFE) supported by
DECI-2
6. UFE in 12 steps:
1. Assessing program readiness
2. Assessing evaluator readiness
3. Identifying primary intended users
4. Situational analysis
5. Identification of primary intended uses
6. Focusing the evaluation
7. Evaluation design
8. Simulation of use
9. Data collection
10. Data analysis
11. Facilitation of use
12. Meta evaluation
Steps in the
Utilization
Focused
Evaluation
(UFE)
process
7. Curation in the ROER4D project
Outputs from the
project:
Open approach has a considerable influence on the
curation strategy and how it is shaped
8. Curation in the ROER4D project
Open approach has a considerable influence on the
curation strategy and how it is shaped
9. Curation platforms
Platform Function Capabilities
Content Management
System (Sakai - Vula)
Long-term, private and secure
storage of project document drafts,
raw data and confidential/internal
documentation
Security
Privacy
Long term curation
Open access repository
(OpenUCT)
Long-term, open access to project
outputs and linked data
Security
Metadata
Accessibility
Long-term curation
Curation spaces:
1. FigShare, Zenodo
2. SlideShare
Short to medium-term access to:
1. Project outputs and linked data
2. Presentations
Security
Various levels of metadata
Broader accessibility
Short to medium-
term curation
Cloud-based
Collaboration Platform
(Google Docs)
Collaborative creation and editing
of documents; sharing of interim
documents and documents under
development
Accessibility
Ease-of-use
Simultaneous creation,
editing and commenting on
documents
11. Extract from ROER4D evaluation plan for curation
Objective 5:
Curate output
as open
content
(outputs =
documents
and data)
Use(s) KEQ(s) Evidence What will
measured
To:
- better
curate the
content.
- ensure
ROER4D is
using the
best
metadata
standard
across
outputs.
5.1.1 How well is
our own
research curated
in order to be
shared?
5.1.2 Where is
the research
that has been
curated and
shared getting
the most hits?
Measure
against
metadata
standards
best practice
- process
review;
Views and
downloads
Measure
against the e.g.
Digital
Curation
Centre’s (DCC)
standards of
best practice:
Checklist for
data
management
plan, etc.
Process of
curation of
documents and
data against
checklist
Monitor
curation
spaces to
gather views
and
downloads
data
e.g. From the
OpenUCT
publically
available
statistics: Views
and downloads
12. Lessons Learnt: Opportunities & Challenges
Opportunities
Transparency & Adaptability:
Open and inclusive team dynamics
Capitalising on new insights
Reciprocity:
Connections between curation and
communication work and its
evaluation
Within the evaluation plan
Accessibility, Adaptability &
Discoverability:
Multiple platforms and outputs
Evaluation can inform which
platforms are the adequate
Challenges
Readiness & Adaptability :
When to be open
Evaluation needs to adapt to a
changing curation strategy
Cohesiveness:
Across platforms
Within the evaluation plan
Vulnerability/Instability:
3rd-party platforms
Extract analytics data regularly
13. Curation platforms & evaluation plan – an example
Curation
Platform
Platform
Function
Relevant KEQs
Evaluation
measures
Uses for the evaluation
results
Content
Management
System
(Sakai)
Long-term,
private and
secure storage
of project
document
drafts, raw data
and
confidential/
internal
documentation
5.1.1 How well
is our own
research
curated in
order to be
shared?
5.1.2 Where is
the research
that has been
curated and
shared getting
the most hits?
Measure
against the
e.g. DCC
standards of
best practice
Available
statistics:
Views and
downloads
- better curate the
content.
- ensure ROER4D is
using the best
metadata standard
across outputs.
- determine if it is
productive to produce
multiple formats of
outputs
- ensure cohesion
across platforms.
15. Further reading:
• DCC. (2013). Checklist for a Data Management Plan. v.4.0. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre.
Available online: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/data-management-plans [Last accessed 10 February
2015].
• Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2013). Research on Open Educational Resources for Development in Post-
secondary Education in the Global South (ROER4D) - Scoping Document. Available online:
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8430 [Last accessed 10 February 2015].
• Hodgkinson-Williams, C. and Arinto, P. (2014). Open Education for a Multicultural World: A report from
the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project in the Global South.
Available online: http://www.slideshare.net/ROER4D/roer4-d-hodgkinson-williams-arinto-ocwc-2014-
33930519 [Last accessed 11 February 2015].
• Hodgkinson-Williams, C. and Cartmill, T. (2014). Research on Open Educational Resources for
Development in the Global South: 1st Technical Report 23 June 2013 to 27 August 2014. Available
online: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9695 [Last accessed 11 February 2015].
• Monastersky, R. (2013). Publishing Frontiers: The Library reboot. Available online:
http://www.nature.com/news/publishing-frontiers-the-library-reboot-1.12664#/data (Accessed 10
February 2015)
• National Information Standards Organisation (NISO) (2004). Understanding Metadata. Bethesda:
National Information Standards Organisation. Available online: http://www.niso.org/
publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf [Last accessed 11 February 2015].
• Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. California: Sage Publications Inc.
• Ramirez, R. and Brodhead, D. (2013). Utilization Focused Evaluation: A Primer for Evaluators. Penang:
Southbound.
• Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. California: Sage Publications Inc.
• Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, et al. (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices
and Perceptions. PLoS ONE, Vol. 6, no. 6, e21101. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
16. Links and license
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Website: http://roer4d.org
sarah.goodier@uct.ac.za
@SarahGoodier
Excluding images,
screenshots and
logos and/or
unless otherwise
indicated on
content