Download to read offline
Uploaded byForth
Terry O'Day, Expaning Fast Charging, November 2017
The document discusses the growth and challenges of fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles (EVs) in Seattle as of November 2017. It highlights funding sources from state programs, usage statistics, and the importance of equitable distribution of charging locations. The operational costs, including electricity and maintenance, are explored to emphasize the need for a sustainable network model.
More Related Content
Similar to Terry O'Day, Expaning Fast Charging, November 2017
Terry O'Day, Expaning Fast Charging, November 2017
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 2012 2013 20142015 2016 2017 Fast Charging Locations and Sessions total chargers total sites sessions NETWORK GROWTH • Average of 10 sessions per site per day at 244 sites statewide • As many as 70 sessions per site per day (Lucky Fremont, 18 sessions/charger)
- 4. Existing EVgo Stations ForthEVIPP Locations
- 5. VW DIESEL SETTLEMENT $17billion nationwide $2.0 Billion to Electrify America Intercity / Interstate $2.9 Billion to Environmental Mitigation Trust (EMT) for State Programs States can allocate a maximum of 15% to EV Charging 28 states have shown commitment or likelihood to commit the max 15% Washington value $17 million EMT covers 80% of construction and installation of publicly accessible stations As of 0ctober, 2017
- 6. Next Generation -Fast Charge Network Source: BNEF 8/16 • Multiple new capital funding sources – is it enough? • Why do we need public fast charging • Operating Costs are the NEW Chicken And Egg • What should be learned from early investments and pilots? • Owner Operator Model • How can we ensure equity in distribution and cost of EV charging? • What is the growth model for infrastructure that leverages the new investments?
- 7. SAMPLE NETWORK UTILIZATION •Providing a network inherently means that some sites will be high utilization and some will be low • Even the low utilization sites are important
- 8. • TNC drivershave logged an as much as 50% of total sessions in the Chicago market • TNC sessions provide a steady increase in utilization while exposing more people to EVs • Some sites (Las Americas) in San Diego are experiencing a 100% increase in utilization, with 50% of sessions from TNC drivers EMERGING USE CASE IMPACT ON UTILIZATION
- 9.
- 10. EVgo Not-O/O BlinkNot O/O Other National Average DC Network PlugScore 9.0 7.7 5.5 6.8 7.0 # DC Charging Sites - Los Angeles 64 24 6 17 28 Average DC PlugScore - Los Angeles 9.3 8.2 5.6 7.7 7.9 # DC Charging Sites - San Francisco 52 19 30 8 10 Average DC PlugScore - San Francisco 8.5 8.3 5.6 6.3 7.4 PlugScoreComparison April 30, 2016 OWNER OPERATOR MODEL
- 11. DC Fast Charging OperationalCosts Breakdown Electricity is only 40% of operational costs Electricity 40% Maintenance Expenses 30% Account Related Expenses 10% Site Related Expenses 20% Capital Recovery?