TPACK development in teacher design teams: assessing the perceived and observ...Ayoub Kafyulilo
This paper was presented at the Society for Information Technology in Teachers Education In New Orleans (Louisiana) USA. An international conference held from 25th to 29th March 2013.
Symposium on TPACK at SITE 2014
TPACK is recognized by many as a useful conceptual framework to help define the knowledge base teachers’ need to know to effectively integrate technology in their educational practice. However, determining whether teachers indeed have developed the knowledge and skills required for effective technology integration – or in short whether they have developed TPACK – is a much more complicated issue. This symposium discusses how artifacts are being used in assessing pre-service and practicing teachers technology integration competencies. TPACK calls for coherence between content, pedagogy and technology. The assumption is that having TPACK also implies teachers’ being able to demonstrate technology integration competencies. This assumption implies a fit between (pre-service) teachers’ TPACK (often measured through self-report instruments) and the artifacts they produce.
In this symposium we discuss how different kinds of artifacts, e.g. lesson plans and lesson practice as demonstrated in video clips can be used as an indicator of a teacher’s technology integration competencies. In this symposium we discuss different artifacts (pre-service) teachers produce in order to demonstrate that they have TPACK. In the symposium different artifacts will be discussed, such as lesson plans and video clips that show technology use in classroom practice. The symposium deals with the potential and restrictions of artifacts as indicator for technology integration, the assessment of artifacts and the relation with other TPACK measures, such as the TPACK survey from Schmidt et al. (2010). Examples from different educational contexts will be presented and discussed.
This presentation focuses on technology integration and the effective use of the ET in DoDEA classes based on a framework created by Punya Mishra and Michael Koehler of Michigan State University.
Presentation on large-scale e-Learning for Educators online professional development program and research with online training and courses by EdTech Leaders Online at EDC.
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation edna bravomohamed elsyed
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation Edna Bravo, Department of Management Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain edna.bravo@upc.edu Beatriz Amante, Department of engineering projects Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain beatriz.amante@upc.edu Pep Simo, Mihaela Enache, Vicenc Fernandez Department of Management Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain Abstract— The main objective
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation edna bravomohamed elsyed
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation Edna Bravo, Department of Management Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain edna.bravo@upc.edu Beatriz Amante, Department of engineering projects Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain beatriz.amante@upc.edu Pep Simo, Mihaela Enache, Vicenc Fernandez Department of
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and attitudes are important for understanding and improving educational processes, because they are closely linked to teachers’ challenges in their daily professional life. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) seems to play a major role in this. In this study we look at teachers' self-efficacy towards the domain of science education and towards technology integration in this domain. Since most students who enter pre-service elementary school training in the Netherlands graduated from secondary school without science-related courses, many lack any foundational science knowledge. This contributes to their (absence of) confidence to teach science, and it also delimits their science-teaching related PCK. In a recent study Fisser, Ormel and Velthuis (submitted) measured teachers' beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to science education in primary education, based on a Dutch version of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI) (Riggs & Enochs, 1990). The results for the pre-service teachers showed that the more pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience actual teaching in the science domain, the higher the sense of self-efficacy is. Combining science education with technology integration offers even more challenges for teachers. Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy towards technology integration will be done by using a Dutch version of the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009). This survey will be complimented with the STEBI survey and, because the TPACK survey does not take into account teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards technology, questions related to the attitude of teachers towards using technology in education will be added. The combined TPACK-STEBI survey will be distributed to Dutch pre-service primary education students and the results will be presented at the SITE symposium.
TPACK development in teacher design teams: assessing the perceived and observ...Ayoub Kafyulilo
This paper was presented at the Society for Information Technology in Teachers Education In New Orleans (Louisiana) USA. An international conference held from 25th to 29th March 2013.
Symposium on TPACK at SITE 2014
TPACK is recognized by many as a useful conceptual framework to help define the knowledge base teachers’ need to know to effectively integrate technology in their educational practice. However, determining whether teachers indeed have developed the knowledge and skills required for effective technology integration – or in short whether they have developed TPACK – is a much more complicated issue. This symposium discusses how artifacts are being used in assessing pre-service and practicing teachers technology integration competencies. TPACK calls for coherence between content, pedagogy and technology. The assumption is that having TPACK also implies teachers’ being able to demonstrate technology integration competencies. This assumption implies a fit between (pre-service) teachers’ TPACK (often measured through self-report instruments) and the artifacts they produce.
In this symposium we discuss how different kinds of artifacts, e.g. lesson plans and lesson practice as demonstrated in video clips can be used as an indicator of a teacher’s technology integration competencies. In this symposium we discuss different artifacts (pre-service) teachers produce in order to demonstrate that they have TPACK. In the symposium different artifacts will be discussed, such as lesson plans and video clips that show technology use in classroom practice. The symposium deals with the potential and restrictions of artifacts as indicator for technology integration, the assessment of artifacts and the relation with other TPACK measures, such as the TPACK survey from Schmidt et al. (2010). Examples from different educational contexts will be presented and discussed.
This presentation focuses on technology integration and the effective use of the ET in DoDEA classes based on a framework created by Punya Mishra and Michael Koehler of Michigan State University.
Presentation on large-scale e-Learning for Educators online professional development program and research with online training and courses by EdTech Leaders Online at EDC.
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation edna bravomohamed elsyed
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation Edna Bravo, Department of Management Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain edna.bravo@upc.edu Beatriz Amante, Department of engineering projects Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain beatriz.amante@upc.edu Pep Simo, Mihaela Enache, Vicenc Fernandez Department of Management Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain Abstract— The main objective
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation edna bravomohamed elsyed
Video as a new teaching tool to increase student motivation Edna Bravo, Department of Management Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain edna.bravo@upc.edu Beatriz Amante, Department of engineering projects Technical University of Catalonia Barcelona, Spain beatriz.amante@upc.edu Pep Simo, Mihaela Enache, Vicenc Fernandez Department of
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and attitudes are important for understanding and improving educational processes, because they are closely linked to teachers’ challenges in their daily professional life. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) seems to play a major role in this. In this study we look at teachers' self-efficacy towards the domain of science education and towards technology integration in this domain. Since most students who enter pre-service elementary school training in the Netherlands graduated from secondary school without science-related courses, many lack any foundational science knowledge. This contributes to their (absence of) confidence to teach science, and it also delimits their science-teaching related PCK. In a recent study Fisser, Ormel and Velthuis (submitted) measured teachers' beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to science education in primary education, based on a Dutch version of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI) (Riggs & Enochs, 1990). The results for the pre-service teachers showed that the more pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience actual teaching in the science domain, the higher the sense of self-efficacy is. Combining science education with technology integration offers even more challenges for teachers. Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy towards technology integration will be done by using a Dutch version of the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009). This survey will be complimented with the STEBI survey and, because the TPACK survey does not take into account teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards technology, questions related to the attitude of teachers towards using technology in education will be added. The combined TPACK-STEBI survey will be distributed to Dutch pre-service primary education students and the results will be presented at the SITE symposium.
The TPACK framework has been used to prepare prospective science teachers at the Public Authority of Applied Education and Training (PAAET) in Kuwait for technology integration in education. Prospective science teachers worked in teams to design a technological solution for a pedagogical problem that teachers usually face. Prospective science teachers were separated in two groups. The first group was coached by technology, pedagogy, and content experts (human support condition). The second group (blended support condition) was supported by using a blended approach, by which they had access to an online portal with different tutorials and examples and they also had the opportunity to meet with the technology, pedagogy and content experts whenever needed. From the literature there is strong evidence that a positive teacher attitude towards technology plays a critical role in the success of the technology integration process, but only a positive attitude to use technology in education is pointless if it is not supported with the necessary skills to use technology (Christensen & Knezek, 2008). In a pre-test post test design data were collected of prospective science teachers’ attitude toward ICT, their ICT skills, and their TPACK. The study showed that the attitude towards ICT, Technological Knowledge (TK) and technological skills were increased. This implies that the prospective teachers became more competent and confident in using technology. It was also found that there was significant growth in TPACK. However, it was found that the blended support condition had a higher increase in their Technological Knowledge (TK) and Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), and their attitude toward computer as a tool for productivity and enjoyment compared to the human support condition. This indicates that the blended approach for supporting design teams could be a suitable method to enhance the development of TPACK.
Determining practicing and prospective teachers’ self-efficacy in TPACK in the science domain
Petra Fisser, Joke Voogt, Bart Ormel, Chantal Velthuis & Jo Tondeur, University of Twente, The Netherlands, Edith Stein University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands, University of Ghent, Belgium
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and attitudes are important for understanding and improving educational processes, because they are closely linked to teachers’ challenges in their daily professional life. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) seems to play a major role in this. In this study we look at teachers' self-efficacy towards the domain of science education and towards technology integration in this domain. Since most students who enter pre-service elementary school training in the Netherlands graduated from secondary school without science-related courses, many lack any foundational science knowledge. This contributes to their (absence of) confidence to teach science, and it also delimits their science-teaching related PCK. In a recent study Fisser, Ormel and Velthuis (submitted) measured teachers' beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to science education in primary education, based on a Dutch version of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI) (Riggs & Enochs, 1990). The results for the pre-service teachers showed that the more pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience actual teaching in the science domain, the higher the sense of self-efficacy is. Combining science education with technology integration offers even more challenges for teachers. Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy towards technology integration will be done by using a Dutch version of the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009). This survey will be complimented with the STEBI survey and, because the TPACK survey does not take into account teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards technology, questions related to the attitude of teachers towards using technology in education will be added. The combined TPACK-STEBI survey will be distributed to Dutch pre-service primary education students and the results will be presented at the SITE symposium.
preparing student teachers to integrate ICT in classroom practice: a synthesi...Vrije Universiteit Brussel
The need to better align teachers’ preparation in the integration of ICT with pedagogical issues and curriculum integration is well understood. Practical experiences from across the world sustain such viewpoints while at the same time emphasising the difficulties and challenges faced in the implementation of such programmes. Therefore, it is of great importance to understand the effectiveness of strategies to prepare student teachers. Given the lack of a comprehensive review about these strategies, the purpose of this study is to reveal the most useful strategies for contemporary ICT integration in student teacher education programmes. More specifically, a synthesis of qualitative research was used to locate, critically appraise and synthesise the evidence base (cf. Petticrew, 2001) for interventions to effectively prepare student teacher to integrate ICT in classroom practices.
Technology, Pedagogy And Content Knowledgeteacherlara247
This is an interactive training in TPACK (technology, pedagogy and content knowledge: Mishra and Koehler, 2006) I did for a local university faculty retreat.
Also within are links to Karl Fleisch\'s "Did You Know?" versions from teachertube.
Presentation at SITE 2010 by Kristen Kereliuk based on research by Kristen, Mete Akcaoglu, and myself on preservice teacher implementation of technology in their lesson plan artifacts, coded using a TPaCK model.
Preparing Pre-service Primary Teachers to Teach with Technology: A Case of En...Dr. İpek Saralar-Aras
how to cite: Saralar-Aras, İ., & Firat, K. (2021, September). Preparing Pre-service Primary Teachers to Teach with Technology: A Case of England. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER) Emerging Researchers’ Conference 2021. Geneva, Switzerland & Online, ECER.
This is the slide show that will be presented at ECER 2021. It is based on a multiple case study with six PGCE students about their technology integration.
). Reflections on methodology used in assessing teachers´perceptions of colle...University of Iceland
Title:
Reflections on methodology used in assessing teachers´perceptions of collective efficacy. Working with emerging curriculum areas and action competence
Abstract/ Introduction
In many countries new curriculum areas are emerging in response to societal changes. This calls for enhanced efficacy and success depends on whether teachers trust themselves and their colleagues to meet new demands. Further, learners are expected to develop agency for change and teachers to develop collective teacher efficacy (CTE).
Increased emphasis on competences and global comparative studies…. Children of today may have fewer opportunities to challenge and solve open ended problems. The power concept CTE enables educators to identify their own weaknesses and strengths in relation to the challenges of the 21st century. Research identified four new curriculum areas in the EmergeCTE project where particular demands were made of teachers: sustainability, use of information and communication technology, innovation education and school science in the 21st century and focused on action competence (AC) as the teaching task. Key features of AC individuals are that they are participants capable of being critical actors in democratic processes.
The purpose of this symposium is to discuss selected issues from the EmergeCTE research. These include issues in the development of the questionnaires (paper 1), the role of case study in supporting questionnaire development (paper 2) and finally about mining the data and finding the factors (paper 3).
The citation (APA style)
Svanborg R. Jónsdóttir, Allyson Macdonald, Svanborg R. Jónsdóttir, Svava Pétursdóttir og Sigurbjörg Jóhannesdóttir. (2017, 23. November). Reflections on methodology used in assessing teachers´perceptions of collective efficacy. Working with emerging curriculum areas and action competence. Á SERA Scottish Education Research Association Annual Conference. University of Dundee, Scotland.Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/sibba/reflections-on-methodology
Presented at the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT C) "In dreams begins responsibility" ‐ choice, evidence, and change. Manchester, UK, 8 -10 September 2009.
The TPACK framework has been used to prepare prospective science teachers at the Public Authority of Applied Education and Training (PAAET) in Kuwait for technology integration in education. Prospective science teachers worked in teams to design a technological solution for a pedagogical problem that teachers usually face. Prospective science teachers were separated in two groups. The first group was coached by technology, pedagogy, and content experts (human support condition). The second group (blended support condition) was supported by using a blended approach, by which they had access to an online portal with different tutorials and examples and they also had the opportunity to meet with the technology, pedagogy and content experts whenever needed. From the literature there is strong evidence that a positive teacher attitude towards technology plays a critical role in the success of the technology integration process, but only a positive attitude to use technology in education is pointless if it is not supported with the necessary skills to use technology (Christensen & Knezek, 2008). In a pre-test post test design data were collected of prospective science teachers’ attitude toward ICT, their ICT skills, and their TPACK. The study showed that the attitude towards ICT, Technological Knowledge (TK) and technological skills were increased. This implies that the prospective teachers became more competent and confident in using technology. It was also found that there was significant growth in TPACK. However, it was found that the blended support condition had a higher increase in their Technological Knowledge (TK) and Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), and their attitude toward computer as a tool for productivity and enjoyment compared to the human support condition. This indicates that the blended approach for supporting design teams could be a suitable method to enhance the development of TPACK.
Determining practicing and prospective teachers’ self-efficacy in TPACK in the science domain
Petra Fisser, Joke Voogt, Bart Ormel, Chantal Velthuis & Jo Tondeur, University of Twente, The Netherlands, Edith Stein University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands, University of Ghent, Belgium
Teachers’ beliefs, practices and attitudes are important for understanding and improving educational processes, because they are closely linked to teachers’ challenges in their daily professional life. Self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977) seems to play a major role in this. In this study we look at teachers' self-efficacy towards the domain of science education and towards technology integration in this domain. Since most students who enter pre-service elementary school training in the Netherlands graduated from secondary school without science-related courses, many lack any foundational science knowledge. This contributes to their (absence of) confidence to teach science, and it also delimits their science-teaching related PCK. In a recent study Fisser, Ormel and Velthuis (submitted) measured teachers' beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to science education in primary education, based on a Dutch version of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument (STEBI) (Riggs & Enochs, 1990). The results for the pre-service teachers showed that the more pre-service teachers have the opportunity to experience actual teaching in the science domain, the higher the sense of self-efficacy is. Combining science education with technology integration offers even more challenges for teachers. Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy towards technology integration will be done by using a Dutch version of the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009). This survey will be complimented with the STEBI survey and, because the TPACK survey does not take into account teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards technology, questions related to the attitude of teachers towards using technology in education will be added. The combined TPACK-STEBI survey will be distributed to Dutch pre-service primary education students and the results will be presented at the SITE symposium.
preparing student teachers to integrate ICT in classroom practice: a synthesi...Vrije Universiteit Brussel
The need to better align teachers’ preparation in the integration of ICT with pedagogical issues and curriculum integration is well understood. Practical experiences from across the world sustain such viewpoints while at the same time emphasising the difficulties and challenges faced in the implementation of such programmes. Therefore, it is of great importance to understand the effectiveness of strategies to prepare student teachers. Given the lack of a comprehensive review about these strategies, the purpose of this study is to reveal the most useful strategies for contemporary ICT integration in student teacher education programmes. More specifically, a synthesis of qualitative research was used to locate, critically appraise and synthesise the evidence base (cf. Petticrew, 2001) for interventions to effectively prepare student teacher to integrate ICT in classroom practices.
Technology, Pedagogy And Content Knowledgeteacherlara247
This is an interactive training in TPACK (technology, pedagogy and content knowledge: Mishra and Koehler, 2006) I did for a local university faculty retreat.
Also within are links to Karl Fleisch\'s "Did You Know?" versions from teachertube.
Presentation at SITE 2010 by Kristen Kereliuk based on research by Kristen, Mete Akcaoglu, and myself on preservice teacher implementation of technology in their lesson plan artifacts, coded using a TPaCK model.
Preparing Pre-service Primary Teachers to Teach with Technology: A Case of En...Dr. İpek Saralar-Aras
how to cite: Saralar-Aras, İ., & Firat, K. (2021, September). Preparing Pre-service Primary Teachers to Teach with Technology: A Case of England. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER) Emerging Researchers’ Conference 2021. Geneva, Switzerland & Online, ECER.
This is the slide show that will be presented at ECER 2021. It is based on a multiple case study with six PGCE students about their technology integration.
). Reflections on methodology used in assessing teachers´perceptions of colle...University of Iceland
Title:
Reflections on methodology used in assessing teachers´perceptions of collective efficacy. Working with emerging curriculum areas and action competence
Abstract/ Introduction
In many countries new curriculum areas are emerging in response to societal changes. This calls for enhanced efficacy and success depends on whether teachers trust themselves and their colleagues to meet new demands. Further, learners are expected to develop agency for change and teachers to develop collective teacher efficacy (CTE).
Increased emphasis on competences and global comparative studies…. Children of today may have fewer opportunities to challenge and solve open ended problems. The power concept CTE enables educators to identify their own weaknesses and strengths in relation to the challenges of the 21st century. Research identified four new curriculum areas in the EmergeCTE project where particular demands were made of teachers: sustainability, use of information and communication technology, innovation education and school science in the 21st century and focused on action competence (AC) as the teaching task. Key features of AC individuals are that they are participants capable of being critical actors in democratic processes.
The purpose of this symposium is to discuss selected issues from the EmergeCTE research. These include issues in the development of the questionnaires (paper 1), the role of case study in supporting questionnaire development (paper 2) and finally about mining the data and finding the factors (paper 3).
The citation (APA style)
Svanborg R. Jónsdóttir, Allyson Macdonald, Svanborg R. Jónsdóttir, Svava Pétursdóttir og Sigurbjörg Jóhannesdóttir. (2017, 23. November). Reflections on methodology used in assessing teachers´perceptions of collective efficacy. Working with emerging curriculum areas and action competence. Á SERA Scottish Education Research Association Annual Conference. University of Dundee, Scotland.Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/sibba/reflections-on-methodology
Presented at the Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT C) "In dreams begins responsibility" ‐ choice, evidence, and change. Manchester, UK, 8 -10 September 2009.
Meaningful use of ICT in education requires teachers to develop knowledge and skills that enables them to integrate ICT with a suitable pedagogical approach for teaching specific subject matter in a certain context. Koehler & Mishra (2008) introduced Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a conceptual framework to describe the knowledge base teachers need for effective teaching with technology. This symposium aims to present successful strategies to develop Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) as emerged from several studies in different countries around the world. Based on the studies, and a further in-depth analysis of the data we tried to further uncover the conceptual understanding and the empirical validation of the TPACK framework. Active collaboration of teachers seems to be an effective way to develop TPACK, but the question remains how TPACK as a conceptual framework can be understood.
Symposium at the 24th Annual International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, 27 March 2013.
This symposium discusses several ways in which (pre-service) teachers‟ TPACK can be measured. The first two studies unravel the TPACK survey (Schmidt et al., 2009), a self-report instrument to determine TPACK, and try to revalidate the survey in two different pre-service teacher education contexts: The US and the Netherlands. The third study triangulates findings from the TPACK survey with other instruments to better understand teachers‟ development of TPACK that resulted from teachers‟ collaborative design of technology integrated lessons. The last contribution focuses on measuring transfer of TPACK, as it studies how beginning teachers, who had TPACK training during their pre-service education, demonstrated TPACK in their practice. Similarities and differences in the ways TPACK were measured and its implications will be discussed.
Physics team at kibasila sec school made an animation on the Hooke's law of Elasticity. These teachers have never used a computer before for teaching purposes. This lesson is a result of a two days workshop and collaboration in design teams
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Teacher design team as a professional develoment arrangement to develop TPACK among science teachers in Tanzania
1. Teacher Design Team as a Professional Development Arrangement for Developing
TPACK among Science Teachers in Tanzania
Ayoub Kafyulilo Petra Fisser Joke Voogt
a.kafyulilo@utwente.nl p.h.g.fisser@utwente.nl j.m.voogt@utwente.nl
Abstract Introduction
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not, Teacher design team refer to a group of at least two teachers, from the same or
teacher design team is a promising professional development related subjects, working together on a regular basis, with the goal to (re)design and
arrangement for developing Technological Pedagogical enact (a part of) their common curriculum” (Handelzalts, 2009).
Content Knowledge (TPACK) among science teachers in In Tanzania teachers are not yet working in design teams, instead there is a broad-
Tanzania. 12 science teachers participated in a workshop based collaboration designed to facilitate what are in the nature of tea-time meetings
about TPACK and joined in design teams for biology, chemistry where teachers would discuss the emerging issues at schools (Kafyulilo, 2012)
and physics lessons. A pre and post intervention assessment of The individualism approach has been hindering teachers from the opportunity to
teachers’ TPACK was done by using a TPACK survey, learn from each other and enhancemnet of students’ learning outcomes in science
teachers’ interview, an observation checklist and focus group subjects.
discussion. Results showed a significant change in teachers Thus, this study adopt teachers design team as a professional development
perceived and observed TPACK between pre and post arrangement to develop teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
intervention. (TPACK) for effective teaching with technology.
Research questions
The main research question in this study was; what is the impact of teachers’ collaboration in design team on their development of knowledge and skills of
integrating technology in science teaching? This main research question is answered by dividing it into four sub questions:
1. What is the in-service teachers’ perceived TPACK before and after the professional development arrangement?
2. What are the observed in-service teachers’ practices with technology-enhanced science teaching before and after the professional development arrangement?
3. What TPACK competencies do science teachers develop during collaborative lesson design in teacher design teams?
4. What are the teachers’ perceptions towards collaboration in teacher design teams as a professional development arrangement?
CK
PCK
TCK
TPCK
PK
TK TPK
Methodology Results: Qn 1 & 2
In this study we adopted the pre and post Table 1: Perceived teachers’ TPACK before and after the Intervention
intervention assessment of teachers’ perceived Pre intervention Post intervention
and observed knowledge and skills of integrating TPACK components M (SD) M (SD) Sig. Effect size
technology in science teaching. A total of 12 Technological Knowledge 3.13 (0.43) 4.18 (0.42) 0.002 2.47
teachers participated in the workshop about Pedagogical Knowledge 3.98 (0.69) 4.63 (0.39) 0.003 1.16
TPACK and joined in design teams for biology, Content Knowledge 4.00 (0.56) 4.40 (0.61) 0.035 0.68
Pedagogical Content Knowledge 3.82 (0.66) 4.40 (0.61) 0.020 0.91
chemistry and physics lessons. There were four Technological Pedagogical Knowledge 3.14 (0.59) 4.23 (0.58) 0.002 1.86
teachers in each team. Technological Content Knowledge 2.85 (0.67) 4.30 (0.56) 0.002 2.35
Data were collected by using a teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
2.97 (0.83) 4.27 (0.55) 0.002 1.85
questionnaire, teachers’ interview, teachers’
observation checklist and teachers’ focus group Table 2: Observed teachers’ TPACK before and after the Intervention
Pre Post
discussion. TPACK components intervention intervention Z Sig. Effect size
Data analysis was done by computing means M (SD) M (SD)
and standard deviations, and the difference Technology Knowledge 1.17 (0.17) 2.60 (0.23) ‐2.201 0.028 7.07
between pre and post intervention assessment Pedagogical Knowledge 2.19 (0.08) 2.79 (0.35) ‐2.226 0.026 2.36
Pedagogical Content Knowledge 2.43 (0.08) 2.83 (0.34) ‐2.032 0.042 1.62
was determined through a Wilcoxon signed
Technological Content Knoweldge 1.20 (0.15) 2.83 (0.40) ‐2.214 0.027 5.40
ranks test for two related samples Technological Pedagogical Knowledge 1.20 (0.15) 2.63 (0.31) ‐2.214 0.027 5.87
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge 1.40 (0.11) 2.70 (0.25) ‐2.214 0.027 6.73
Results: Qn 3 & 4 Conclusions
Teachers indicated from the interview and focus group discussion to have learned all the (1) Teacher design team offers an opportunity for enhancement of teachers’
TPACK components except Content Knowledge. However, majority indicated to have perceived and practiced technology integration knowledge and skills
learned more on how to use Power Point. In addition, more teachers reported to have (2) In a design team, teachers can develop not only the technology related
spent a lot of thier time in the design of animation by using a PowerPoint. components of TPACK but also CK, PK and PCK
All teachers indicated positive attitude towards collaboration in design teams for their (3) Teachers spend too much time in the design team meetings than it could
own learning and students’ learning outcomes. However, majority of teachers complains have been expected. For teachers to use their time more efficiently the y
about the time they were spending on the process of design in a lesson. Thus they need to get a support. The support could be collaboration guidelines, an
thought teacher design team was time inefficient for them expert , exemplary lessons, or ready made animation materials .