This presentation is in accordance to the study carried out at Dar es salaam University College of Education (DUCE) in Tanzania.

1. Practical Use of ICT in Science and Mathematics Teachers Training at DUCE: An Analysis of Prospective Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Ayoub C Kafyulilo Master Thesis Supervisors Dr. Petra Fisser Dr. Joke Voogt

7. Research design (1/7): Action Research

8. Research Design (2/7): Participants 2 0 1 1 34-42 1 3 4 Instructors 8 1 6 14 20-36 3 26 29 Students Bio Chem Ph Mat F M No. Teaching Subject Age Gender Participants

13. Results (Qn 1): What competencies do preservice teachers have in ICT integration? Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=not sure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 X 0.58 3.46 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge 0.67 4.03 Technological Pedagogical Knowledge 0.53 3.54 Technological Content Knowledge 0.57 4.17 Pedagogical Content Knowledge 0.48 4.55 Content knowledge 0.46 4.29 Pedagogical Knowledge 0.65 3.18 Technological Knowledge SD M Competency area

14. Results (Qn 1): What competencies do preservice teachers have in ICT integration? Scale: 1 = No and 2 = Yes 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 X 0.33 1.41 Technological Content Knowledge 0.32 1.74 Pedagogical Content Knowledge 0.22 1.41 Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge 0.41 1.54 Technological Pedagogical knowledge 0.27 1.38 Pedagogical knowledge 0.20 1.68 Content Knowledge 0.28 1.50 Technological Knowledge SD M Competency

17. Results (Qn2): Effective practices (Relevance) Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=agree, 3=not sure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree 26 26 26 26 X 0.58 4.42 Presentation and peers’ appraisal were relevant to my profession 0.57 4.38 Lesson design was relevant to my profession 0.51 4.46 Training was relevant to my profession 0.51 4.50 Microteaching was relevant to my profession SD M Intervention activity

18. Results (Qn 2): Effective Practices (Knowledge) Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=agree, 3=not sure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree 26 26 26 26 X 0.60 4.27 I attain sufficient TPACK during lesson design 0.64 4.38 I attain sufficient TPACK during Peers’ appraisal 0.71 4.46 I attained sufficient TPACK during training 0.50 4.42 I attained sufficient TPACK during microteaching SD M Intervention

19. Results (Qn 2): Effective practices (Skills) Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=not sure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree 26 26 26 26 X 0.51 4.50 I attained sufficient skills in peer appraisal 0.60 4.27 I attained sufficient skills Lesson Design 0.58 4.42 I attained sufficient skills in training 0.59 4.23 I attained sufficient skills in microteaching SD M Intervention

20. Results (Qn 2): Effective practices (Competency) Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=agree, 3=not sure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree 26 26 26 X 0.89 4.35 The intervention activities enhanced my competency in content 0.51 4.46 The intervention activities enhanced my pedagogical competency 0.71 4.04 The intervention activities enhanced my technological competency SD M Intervention

21. Results (Qn3): Impacts of interventions (survey) 0.51 3.85 TPACK1 0.02 0.38 4.17 TPACK2 Pair 7 0.76 4.03 TPK1 0.05 0.43 4.35 TPK2 Pair 6 0.57 3.98 TCK1 0.04 0.43 4.27 TCK2 Pair 5 0.61 4.20 PCK1 0.38 0.45 4.34 PCK2 Pair 4 0.14 4.55 CK1 0.64 0.24 4.59 CK2 Pair 3 0.43 4.34 PK1 0.95 0.32 4.35 PK2 Pair 2 0.67 3.24 TK1 0.05 0.50 3.66 TK2 Pair 1 P SD M

22. Results (Qn3): Impacts of Interventions (observation) 0.28 1.60 TPCK2 0.00 0.22 1.41 TPCK1 Pair 7 0.38 1.60 TPK2 0.00 0.32 1.54 TPK1 Pair 6 0.35 1.61 TCK2 0.00 0.33 1.41 TCK1 Pair 5 0.36 1.82 PCK2 0.00 0.27 1.74 PCK1 Pair 4 0.39 1.61 CK2 0.10 0.41 1.54 CK1 Pair 3 0.19 1.59 PK2 0.00 0.20 1.38 PK1 Pair 2 0.26 1.68 TK2 0.00 0.28 1.50 TK1 Pair 1 P SD M

23. Results (Qn3): Impacts of Interventions Scale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=not sure, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree 26 26 26 26 X 0.72 3.95 I can provide leadership in helping others on the use of TPACK 0.57 4.32 I can choose technology to use in my classroom that enhances what I teach 0.66 4.18 I can use strategies that can combine content, technology and pedagogy 0.66 4.18 I can teach a lesson that combine science/math, technology and pedagogy SD M Competencies