This activity includes different ways to assess our students: self-assessment, peer's assessment and a rubric.

1. 1. TEACHER’S ASSESSMENT: RUBRIC
Class Debate : WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF EATING JUNK FOOD?
Teacher Name: Ms. Collado
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
Information All information
presented in the debate
was clear, accurate and
thorough.
Most information
presented in the debate
was clear, accurate and
thorough.
Most information
presented in the debate
was clear and accurate,
but was not usually
thorough.
Information had several
inaccuracies OR was
usually not clear.
Rebuttal All counter-arguments
were accurate, relevant
and strong.
Most counter-
arguments were
accurate, relevant, and
strong.
Most counter-
arguments were
accurate and relevant,
but several were weak.
Counter-arguments
were not accurate
and/or relevant
Presentation
Style
Team consistently used
gestures, eye contact,
tone of voice and a
Team usually used
gestures, eye contact,
tone of voice and a
Team sometimes used
gestures, eye contact,
tone of voice and a
One or more members
of the team had a
presentation style that

2. level of enthusiasm in a
way that kept the
attention of the
audience.
level of enthusiasm in a
way that kept the
attention of the
audience.
level of enthusiasm in a
way that kept the
attention of the
audience.
did not keep the
attention of the
audience.
Organization All arguments were
clearly tied to an idea
(premise) and
organized in a tight,
logical fashion.
Most arguments were
clearly tied to an idea
(premise) and
organized in a tight,
logical fashion.
All arguments were
clearly tied to an idea
(premise) but the
organization was
sometimes not clear or
logical.
Arguments were not
clearly tied to an idea
(premise).
Understanding of
Topic
The team clearly
understood the topic in-
depth and presented
their information
forcefully and
convincingly.
The team clearly
undestood the topic in-
depth and presented
their information with
ease.
The team seemed to
understand the main
points of the topic and
presented those with
ease.
The team did not show
an adequate
understanding of the
topic.
Respect for
Other Team
All statements, body
language, and
responses were
respectful and were in
Statements and
responses were
respectful and used
appropriate language,
Most statements and
responses were
respectful and in
appropriate language,
Statements, responses
and/or body language
were consistently not
respectful.

3. appropriate language. but once or twice body
language was not.
but there was one
sarcastic remark.
2. PEER’S ASSESSMENT
Name of presenter: My name:
As a team, decide which answer best suits the way your team worked together.
ASPECT YES NO
We finished our task on time, and we did
a good job.
We encouraged each other and we
cooperated with each other.
We each shared our ideas, then listened
and valued each other’s ideas.
All instructions were well explained and

4. we could do the task without difficulties.
Now complete these sentences with your group.
- We did best at…
- We are good at…
- Next time we could improve at…

5. 3. SELF-ASSESSMENT
4.I can
elaborate a
healthy diet
I can describe what we studied
with my own words
Team work
Participation High level of understanding
I understand and I
apply Jigsaw’s
technique
I can classify food in 5 different food
groups
I learnt new vocabulary
I respect other ideas different from mines
I enjoyed a lot doing the tasks
I recognise my mistakes and my right
answers
Presentation