Submitting for review
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•284 views
Submitting for Review in Taskstream allows an author to request informal feedback on an assignment from reviewers, rather than a formal evaluation. There are two ways to submit for review: by submitting an artifact like a lesson or portfolio, or by submitting individual or multiple requirements. The author checks the box next to the desired reviewer(s) and clicks submit for review. This allows reviewers to provide comments, and the author to respond, in a discussion board format. Submitting for review requires the author and reviewer(s) to be enrolled in a program that allows reviewing.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Reviewer role
The document describes the reviewer role when a student submits an assignment for review, noting that reviewers receive an email notification and provide feedback by adding comments to submitted work rather than a formal evaluation, and outlines the reviewer interface showing submitted assignments sorted by student for line-by-line or overall commenting.
Rubric wizard
The Rubric Wizard is a tool for creating and uploading rubrics that can be used to evaluate student assignments. It allows educators to build rubrics from scratch, upload an existing rubric from a Word document, or adapt an existing rubric from a database. Rubrics are typically created by coordinators and teachers to establish evaluation criteria and standards for assignments.
New employee -Author Guide
1) The document provides instructions for authors (students) submitting work through a Directed Response Folio (DRF) program on Taskstream. It explains how to access the DRF, add attachments, change the order of content, submit work for evaluation, and view evaluation results.
2) Authors can add various types of content to their DRF requirements including text, images, slideshows, videos, links and attachments from their computer. They can also submit a completed form if the requirement includes one.
3) To submit a requirement, the author clicks the Submit Work button and selects their evaluator if given a choice. They can then view the evaluation results by clicking the Scores/Results tab to access the
Submitting for review
Submitting for Review in Taskstream allows an author to request informal feedback on an assignment from reviewers, rather than a formal evaluation. There are two ways to submit for review: by submitting an artifact like a lesson or portfolio, or by submitting individual or multiple requirements. The author checks the box next to the desired reviewer(s) and clicks submit for review. After submitting, the author can view and respond to comments from reviewers in a discussion board format.
Form and survey builder training
Form & Survey Builder allows users to create surveys in two steps: building the form elements in Form & Survey Builder, and then distributing the survey to recipients in Launch and Manage Surveys. The document outlines the steps to build a survey form including adding section headers, open-ended text boxes, multiple choice, and rating scale questions. It also describes customizing the survey design, adding recipients, setting preferences like reminders, and launching the live survey.
Guide for Evaluators
This document provides instructions for evaluators on how to use the Taskstream platform. It outlines how to find programs, access student work, and use the rubric to provide evaluations. Evaluators can search for students, view submitted work, and evaluate it using a rubric or other evaluation method. They can also add optional files and feedback as part of the evaluation process before submitting it.
Running an evaluation form responses report
The Evaluation Form Responses Report allows administrators to generate reports on evaluations completed using custom forms. It provides aggregated results for entire groups of respondents and individual respondents, comparing submission responses. The report can only aggregate data from forms used for evaluations, not author submissions. To run the report, an administrator selects a form, respondents, and evaluation date range. The report displays summary statistics and details, including all individual responses.
Quick start guide - performance by standards reports
This document provides instructions for creating a Performance by Standards report in Taskstream. The report allows users to generate assessment performance reports based on selected standards and rubric criteria. It provides steps for selecting standards, templates, rubric criteria, users/filters, and programs. The report then displays performance results for each criterion and standard, and allows drilling down into standard group and author details.
Recommended
Reviewer role
The document describes the reviewer role when a student submits an assignment for review, noting that reviewers receive an email notification and provide feedback by adding comments to submitted work rather than a formal evaluation, and outlines the reviewer interface showing submitted assignments sorted by student for line-by-line or overall commenting.
Rubric wizard
The Rubric Wizard is a tool for creating and uploading rubrics that can be used to evaluate student assignments. It allows educators to build rubrics from scratch, upload an existing rubric from a Word document, or adapt an existing rubric from a database. Rubrics are typically created by coordinators and teachers to establish evaluation criteria and standards for assignments.
New employee -Author Guide
1) The document provides instructions for authors (students) submitting work through a Directed Response Folio (DRF) program on Taskstream. It explains how to access the DRF, add attachments, change the order of content, submit work for evaluation, and view evaluation results.
2) Authors can add various types of content to their DRF requirements including text, images, slideshows, videos, links and attachments from their computer. They can also submit a completed form if the requirement includes one.
3) To submit a requirement, the author clicks the Submit Work button and selects their evaluator if given a choice. They can then view the evaluation results by clicking the Scores/Results tab to access the
Submitting for review
Submitting for Review in Taskstream allows an author to request informal feedback on an assignment from reviewers, rather than a formal evaluation. There are two ways to submit for review: by submitting an artifact like a lesson or portfolio, or by submitting individual or multiple requirements. The author checks the box next to the desired reviewer(s) and clicks submit for review. After submitting, the author can view and respond to comments from reviewers in a discussion board format.
Form and survey builder training
Form & Survey Builder allows users to create surveys in two steps: building the form elements in Form & Survey Builder, and then distributing the survey to recipients in Launch and Manage Surveys. The document outlines the steps to build a survey form including adding section headers, open-ended text boxes, multiple choice, and rating scale questions. It also describes customizing the survey design, adding recipients, setting preferences like reminders, and launching the live survey.
Guide for Evaluators
This document provides instructions for evaluators on how to use the Taskstream platform. It outlines how to find programs, access student work, and use the rubric to provide evaluations. Evaluators can search for students, view submitted work, and evaluate it using a rubric or other evaluation method. They can also add optional files and feedback as part of the evaluation process before submitting it.
Running an evaluation form responses report
The Evaluation Form Responses Report allows administrators to generate reports on evaluations completed using custom forms. It provides aggregated results for entire groups of respondents and individual respondents, comparing submission responses. The report can only aggregate data from forms used for evaluations, not author submissions. To run the report, an administrator selects a form, respondents, and evaluation date range. The report displays summary statistics and details, including all individual responses.
Quick start guide - performance by standards reports
This document provides instructions for creating a Performance by Standards report in Taskstream. The report allows users to generate assessment performance reports based on selected standards and rubric criteria. It provides steps for selecting standards, templates, rubric criteria, users/filters, and programs. The report then displays performance results for each criterion and standard, and allows drilling down into standard group and author details.
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to access and use the TaskStream platform for evaluating student work. It outlines the multi-step login process through the university's single sign-on system. It then guides faculty through navigating to the evaluation tasks, selecting student submissions to review, using rubrics to provide scores, and generating reports on completed evaluations. The document includes screenshots to illustrate each step of the process.
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate secondary education students' work. It outlines the multi-step login and navigation process. Key steps include selecting programs and assessments to evaluate, accessing student submissions and rubrics, scoring student work, and generating evaluation reports. The goal is to guide faculty evaluators efficiently through the TaskStream interface and evaluation workflow.
D2L Rubrics Guidelines
This document provides instructions for creating two types of rubrics in D2L: analytic rubrics and holistic rubrics. Analytic rubrics assess criteria in rows and achievement levels in columns, allowing for multiple criteria to be assessed. Holistic rubrics assess overall achievement based on a single predefined criterion using achievement levels. The document outlines the steps to create each rubric type, including adding criteria, levels, descriptions, feedback, and scoring methods.
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty homepage, select programs and folios to evaluate, and use the evaluation tools to score rubrics and submit scores. It also describes how to generate reports on completed evaluations.
Ed admin ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides a training guide for using TaskStream, a platform for submitting and evaluating student work. It outlines the steps for faculty to log in to TaskStream, access submitted student work, evaluate assessments using rubrics, and generate reports on evaluation results. Key functions covered include searching for student work, selecting assessments to evaluate, reviewing student submissions and scoring rubrics, and viewing a summary of completed evaluations. The guide is intended to assist faculty with navigating TaskStream and effectively utilizing it to evaluate program-level student assessments.
Elem ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty evaluation homepage, search for and select student work to review, use rubrics to provide scores and feedback, and generate reports on completed evaluations. The goal is to guide instructors through evaluating program assessments and individual student submissions within the TaskStream platform.
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream, navigate to evaluations, select assessments to score, and use the rubrics to provide scores. It also describes how to generate reports on completed evaluations. The key steps are logging in to GWeb, accessing TaskStream through the faculty menu, selecting assessments to evaluate, using the rubrics to enter scores, and generating reports on evaluation results.
Ssets ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides a training guide for instructors on how to use the GWeb Info System and TaskStream platform to evaluate student work and assessments. It outlines the steps to access assessment tools, search for student groups, select rubrics to score, and generate reports on evaluation results. Key functions covered include evaluating student work individually or through a quick score method, submitting evaluation scores, and viewing faculty submitted results on a demo evaluation grid. The guide aims to demonstrate the full evaluation workflow and reporting capabilities within the TaskStream platform for secondary special education assessment.
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the following steps:
1) Log in to TaskStream via the university's single sign-on system using your username and pin.
2) Access the TaskStream link from the faculty menu once logged in.
3) Select the program and semester you need to evaluate student work for and click the appropriate link to see student submissions.
4) Choose the submissions to evaluate, select the "Evaluate" button, and enter scores on the rubric criteria before submitting your evaluation.
The document also describes the QuickScore evaluation method that allows scoring multiple student submissions simultaneously.
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to use the GWeb Info System and TaskStream platform to evaluate students' work. It outlines how to log in to the systems, access evaluation rubrics and student submissions, score student work, and generate reports on evaluation results. The goal is to help faculty efficiently evaluate program assessments and provide feedback to students.
How to evaluate and select vendors with TransparentChoice software
This document provides instructions for using TransparentChoice software to evaluate and select vendors. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) create a project, 2) add vendors manually or by importing from a file, 3) define evaluation criteria in a hierarchy with pairwise comparisons or scales, 4) complete a survey to score vendors and prioritize criteria, and 5) view prioritized ranking and sensitivity analysis results. The document walks through setting up a sample project importing vendors from a spreadsheet, defining financial and credibility criteria, and generating results comparing the top-ranked vendor.
Ecse ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides a training guide for faculty to evaluate student work submissions and assessments using the TaskStream platform. It outlines the steps to access TaskStream through the faculty portal, navigate to evaluation tools, select student work to review using different methods, score rubrics, view reports, and get additional assistance. The guide demonstrates how faculty can efficiently evaluate multiple students' submissions simultaneously or individually using the QuickScore or regular evaluation features in TaskStream.
The VLE @ GSA - assessment tools
The document provides an overview of various assessment tools available in the VLE (virtual learning environment) at GSA (presumably Glasgow School of Art). It discusses how to create assignment uploads, use the grade centre to view submissions and enter grades, and utilize Turnitin for originality checking and leaving feedback. Specific functions covered include creating Turnitin assignments, interpreting originality reports, and using GradeMark to add comments and feedback on student submissions. The document offers step-by-step instructions on setting up and using these various assessment features within the VLE.
Cebd ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides an instructor training guide for using the Taskstream platform to evaluate student work for the Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities program. It outlines how to access Taskstream through the faculty portal, navigate to program assessments, select student work to evaluate, and submit evaluation scores and feedback. Faculty can evaluate individual submissions or use the QuickScore method to evaluate multiple students at once. The guide also explains how to generate reports on completed evaluations.
(Sept.7)
This document provides instructions for using the Text tool in Adobe Animate to add different types of text to a stage. The Text tool allows users to add static, dynamic, or input text with options to set the font, size, and direction. Users can select the Text tool, adjust settings in the Property Inspector, click on the stage to add text, and then select the Arrow tool when finished.
Grade book Guideline
The document provides instructions for setting up and using the grade book tool in D2L. It discusses setting up the grade book with the grade setup wizard which allows selecting a grading system (weighted, points, formula) and default settings. It also covers creating grade items (numeric, select box, pass/fail, etc.), grade schemes, entering grades by user, category or item, importing/exporting grades, and calculating final grades. Setup includes choosing whether to release calculated or adjusted final grades to students.
Markbookhowto
Mark transfers student comments from one system to another in 3 steps:
1) Select comments from a bank and copy them over
2) Set up a report by selecting the correct report type and starting a new file
3) Save the report file and drag and drop it into the correct folder to complete the transfer
Lesson Builder Guide
This document provides instructions for using the LessonBuilder tool in Taskstream:
1. The LessonBuilder can be accessed from the Lessons, Units & Rubrics page and used to create new standards-based lessons, search existing lessons, and edit or delete lessons.
2. To create a new lesson, users select a template and provide a title, then add and save content for each lesson element on the Build Lesson page.
3. Existing lessons can be adapted by copying them or converting between formats like Quick Form and more detailed formats. Archived lessons can also be viewed.
Unit Builder guide
The Taskstream Unit Builder allows users to create and manage instructional units by organizing existing lessons and activities. Users can create new units using templates, search existing units, and edit or delete units. When building a unit, the Unit Builder provides elements to add details like learning objectives, assessments, and attached lessons. Lessons can be created in the Lesson Builder and then associated with units. The Unit Builder helps teachers organize and sequence lessons into cohesive instructional units.
Creating a folio/webpage
This document provides instructions for creating and customizing folios and webpages in Taskstream. It explains how to start, choose between a folio or webpage, name the work, select a template and theme. It also details how to structure the pages, move/copy/add/delete elements, and add various types of content like text, images, slideshows, attachments, standards, and videos. Finally, it covers how to share the work by email, publish it online, or generate a printable PDF.
AMS FAQ's
This document provides answers to common questions about using the AMS (Assessment Management System). It explains how to edit content, check in requirements, add affiliations, create accounts, submit work for review, email usernames and passwords, attach documents, and enroll participating areas in a workspace. Force checking in of requirements by an AMS Coordinator and the check out/check in process to allow editing by one user at a time are also described.
AMS glossary
The document defines various terms related to the Taskstream accountability management system (AMS). Key terms include AMS Coordinator which provides administrative access and tools to set up workspaces and templates. Workspaces group participating areas and reviewers to share and assess plans and artifacts. Templates provide the structure for accountability processes and link assessment tools to requirements. Outcomes must be measurable and can be mapped to goals and assessed in plans.
More Related Content
What's hot
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to access and use the TaskStream platform for evaluating student work. It outlines the multi-step login process through the university's single sign-on system. It then guides faculty through navigating to the evaluation tasks, selecting student submissions to review, using rubrics to provide scores, and generating reports on completed evaluations. The document includes screenshots to illustrate each step of the process.
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate secondary education students' work. It outlines the multi-step login and navigation process. Key steps include selecting programs and assessments to evaluate, accessing student submissions and rubrics, scoring student work, and generating evaluation reports. The goal is to guide faculty evaluators efficiently through the TaskStream interface and evaluation workflow.
D2L Rubrics Guidelines
This document provides instructions for creating two types of rubrics in D2L: analytic rubrics and holistic rubrics. Analytic rubrics assess criteria in rows and achievement levels in columns, allowing for multiple criteria to be assessed. Holistic rubrics assess overall achievement based on a single predefined criterion using achievement levels. The document outlines the steps to create each rubric type, including adding criteria, levels, descriptions, feedback, and scoring methods.
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty homepage, select programs and folios to evaluate, and use the evaluation tools to score rubrics and submit scores. It also describes how to generate reports on completed evaluations.
Ed admin ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides a training guide for using TaskStream, a platform for submitting and evaluating student work. It outlines the steps for faculty to log in to TaskStream, access submitted student work, evaluate assessments using rubrics, and generate reports on evaluation results. Key functions covered include searching for student work, selecting assessments to evaluate, reviewing student submissions and scoring rubrics, and viewing a summary of completed evaluations. The guide is intended to assist faculty with navigating TaskStream and effectively utilizing it to evaluate program-level student assessments.
Elem ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty evaluation homepage, search for and select student work to review, use rubrics to provide scores and feedback, and generate reports on completed evaluations. The goal is to guide instructors through evaluating program assessments and individual student submissions within the TaskStream platform.
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream, navigate to evaluations, select assessments to score, and use the rubrics to provide scores. It also describes how to generate reports on completed evaluations. The key steps are logging in to GWeb, accessing TaskStream through the faculty menu, selecting assessments to evaluate, using the rubrics to enter scores, and generating reports on evaluation results.
Ssets ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides a training guide for instructors on how to use the GWeb Info System and TaskStream platform to evaluate student work and assessments. It outlines the steps to access assessment tools, search for student groups, select rubrics to score, and generate reports on evaluation results. Key functions covered include evaluating student work individually or through a quick score method, submitting evaluation scores, and viewing faculty submitted results on a demo evaluation grid. The guide aims to demonstrate the full evaluation workflow and reporting capabilities within the TaskStream platform for secondary special education assessment.
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the following steps:
1) Log in to TaskStream via the university's single sign-on system using your username and pin.
2) Access the TaskStream link from the faculty menu once logged in.
3) Select the program and semester you need to evaluate student work for and click the appropriate link to see student submissions.
4) Choose the submissions to evaluate, select the "Evaluate" button, and enter scores on the rubric criteria before submitting your evaluation.
The document also describes the QuickScore evaluation method that allows scoring multiple student submissions simultaneously.
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to use the GWeb Info System and TaskStream platform to evaluate students' work. It outlines how to log in to the systems, access evaluation rubrics and student submissions, score student work, and generate reports on evaluation results. The goal is to help faculty efficiently evaluate program assessments and provide feedback to students.
How to evaluate and select vendors with TransparentChoice software
This document provides instructions for using TransparentChoice software to evaluate and select vendors. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) create a project, 2) add vendors manually or by importing from a file, 3) define evaluation criteria in a hierarchy with pairwise comparisons or scales, 4) complete a survey to score vendors and prioritize criteria, and 5) view prioritized ranking and sensitivity analysis results. The document walks through setting up a sample project importing vendors from a spreadsheet, defining financial and credibility criteria, and generating results comparing the top-ranked vendor.
Ecse ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides a training guide for faculty to evaluate student work submissions and assessments using the TaskStream platform. It outlines the steps to access TaskStream through the faculty portal, navigate to evaluation tools, select student work to review using different methods, score rubrics, view reports, and get additional assistance. The guide demonstrates how faculty can efficiently evaluate multiple students' submissions simultaneously or individually using the QuickScore or regular evaluation features in TaskStream.
The VLE @ GSA - assessment tools
The document provides an overview of various assessment tools available in the VLE (virtual learning environment) at GSA (presumably Glasgow School of Art). It discusses how to create assignment uploads, use the grade centre to view submissions and enter grades, and utilize Turnitin for originality checking and leaving feedback. Specific functions covered include creating Turnitin assignments, interpreting originality reports, and using GradeMark to add comments and feedback on student submissions. The document offers step-by-step instructions on setting up and using these various assessment features within the VLE.
Cebd ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
This document provides an instructor training guide for using the Taskstream platform to evaluate student work for the Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities program. It outlines how to access Taskstream through the faculty portal, navigate to program assessments, select student work to evaluate, and submit evaluation scores and feedback. Faculty can evaluate individual submissions or use the QuickScore method to evaluate multiple students at once. The guide also explains how to generate reports on completed evaluations.
(Sept.7)
This document provides instructions for using the Text tool in Adobe Animate to add different types of text to a stage. The Text tool allows users to add static, dynamic, or input text with options to set the font, size, and direction. Users can select the Text tool, adjust settings in the Property Inspector, click on the stage to add text, and then select the Arrow tool when finished.
Grade book Guideline
The document provides instructions for setting up and using the grade book tool in D2L. It discusses setting up the grade book with the grade setup wizard which allows selecting a grading system (weighted, points, formula) and default settings. It also covers creating grade items (numeric, select box, pass/fail, etc.), grade schemes, entering grades by user, category or item, importing/exporting grades, and calculating final grades. Setup includes choosing whether to release calculated or adjusted final grades to students.
Markbookhowto
Mark transfers student comments from one system to another in 3 steps:
1) Select comments from a bank and copy them over
2) Set up a report by selecting the correct report type and starting a new file
3) Save the report file and drag and drop it into the correct folder to complete the transfer
What's hot (17)
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Ed admin ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Ed admin ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Elem ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Elem ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Ssets ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Ssets ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
How to evaluate and select vendors with TransparentChoice software
How to evaluate and select vendors with TransparentChoice software
Ecse ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Ecse ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Cebd ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Cebd ts faculty instructional guide revised 10.18.13
Viewers also liked
Lesson Builder Guide
This document provides instructions for using the LessonBuilder tool in Taskstream:
1. The LessonBuilder can be accessed from the Lessons, Units & Rubrics page and used to create new standards-based lessons, search existing lessons, and edit or delete lessons.
2. To create a new lesson, users select a template and provide a title, then add and save content for each lesson element on the Build Lesson page.
3. Existing lessons can be adapted by copying them or converting between formats like Quick Form and more detailed formats. Archived lessons can also be viewed.
Unit Builder guide
The Taskstream Unit Builder allows users to create and manage instructional units by organizing existing lessons and activities. Users can create new units using templates, search existing units, and edit or delete units. When building a unit, the Unit Builder provides elements to add details like learning objectives, assessments, and attached lessons. Lessons can be created in the Lesson Builder and then associated with units. The Unit Builder helps teachers organize and sequence lessons into cohesive instructional units.
Creating a folio/webpage
This document provides instructions for creating and customizing folios and webpages in Taskstream. It explains how to start, choose between a folio or webpage, name the work, select a template and theme. It also details how to structure the pages, move/copy/add/delete elements, and add various types of content like text, images, slideshows, attachments, standards, and videos. Finally, it covers how to share the work by email, publish it online, or generate a printable PDF.
AMS FAQ's
This document provides answers to common questions about using the AMS (Assessment Management System). It explains how to edit content, check in requirements, add affiliations, create accounts, submit work for review, email usernames and passwords, attach documents, and enroll participating areas in a workspace. Force checking in of requirements by an AMS Coordinator and the check out/check in process to allow editing by one user at a time are also described.
AMS glossary
The document defines various terms related to the Taskstream accountability management system (AMS). Key terms include AMS Coordinator which provides administrative access and tools to set up workspaces and templates. Workspaces group participating areas and reviewers to share and assess plans and artifacts. Templates provide the structure for accountability processes and link assessment tools to requirements. Outcomes must be measurable and can be mapped to goals and assessed in plans.
AMS
This document provides an overview of the Accountability Management System (AMS) for faculty, administrators, and staff. AMS is a portal designed to help institutions manage outcomes assessment and continuous improvement processes. It allows users to define objectives and outcomes collaboratively and track assessments. Users are assigned to workspaces corresponding to their roles to add and review content, and discuss requirements with colleagues. The purpose is to improve learning, not evaluate individuals. Technical support is available through help documents or by contacting the vendor.
Attributes of Great Mentors
The document discusses attributes of great mentors, including having a professional attitude in how you speak, listen, and follow through. Specifically, mentors should be courteous, respectful, dedicated, and thorough. They should make clients feel respected, address their needs, and treat colleagues well. Mentors must get work done thoroughly and follow up to ensure issues are resolved. When helping clients, mentors should use respectful language and avoid blame. Key attributes for mentors also include being inquisitive, knowledgeable, responsive, and focused. Mentors should ask clarifying questions, seek to improve their knowledge, help clients get to the point efficiently, and use common language with newer users.
Viewers also liked (7)
Similar to Submitting for review
The reviewerrole
Reviewers receive email notifications when students submit work for review. Reviewers provide feedback by adding comments to submitted assignments rather than filling out formal evaluations. Reviewers can access submitted work from the reviewer tab and see if new feedback has been requested or added. They can filter the work by student, title, and type. Comments are entered line by line for lessons and units, while individual comments are added for each requirement in DRF programs. Additional information about programs and students can be found in program links.
Sec ed esl fl_ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform for evaluating student work and assessments. It outlines the login process through GWeb, navigating to the faculty menu and TaskStream link, searching for student work, evaluating assessments using rubrics, and generating reports on completed evaluations. The instructions are accompanied by screenshots to illustrate each step of the process.
Creating your DRF program
1. The document provides instructions for creating a Degree Review Framework (DRF) program in Taskstream to distribute a portfolio template to students. This includes entering a program title and description, selecting program options and permissions, enrolling participants, and making the program active.
2. Key steps include selecting the reviewer and evaluator permissions, choosing a template, generating a self-enrollment code for students, and manually enrolling reviewers and evaluators through the member locator.
3. The last sections cover grouping authors with reviewers/evaluators, optionally attaching resources, and changing the program status to active once setup is complete.
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to access and use the TaskStream platform for evaluating student work. It outlines the multi-step login process through the university's single sign-on system. It then guides faculty through navigating to the evaluation tasks, selecting student submissions to review, using rubrics to provide scores, and generating reports on completed evaluations. The document includes screenshots to illustrate each step of the process.
Elem faculty training guide
This document provides instructions for faculty on accessing and using TaskStream at the university. It outlines two ways for faculty to log into TaskStream - directly through the TaskStream website or via single sign-on through the university system. It then explains how to access submitted student work and rubrics to provide evaluations. Faculty can search for individual students or view submissions by program. The instructions describe how to view student responses and score rubrics simultaneously on a split screen. Once scoring is complete, faculty submit their evaluation. Rubrics can also be exported from TaskStream to Microsoft Word.
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to use the GWeb Info System and TaskStream platform to evaluate students' work. It outlines how to log in to the systems, access evaluation rubrics and student submissions, score student work, and generate reports on evaluation results. The focus is on evaluating program-level assessments through the Learning Achievement Tools (LAT) in TaskStream.
Bil sped ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty on how to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream, select a student group and assessment to evaluate, access and score student rubrics using either individual or QuickScore evaluation methods, and generate evaluation reports. The goal is to guide faculty through evaluating program assessments and student work submitted within the TaskStream platform.
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty on how to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream through the university portal, navigate to evaluation tools, select assessments to score, and use different methods like individual evaluation or QuickScore to enter ratings on rubrics. It also describes how to view submission statuses, generate reports on evaluation results, and find additional support resources.
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty on how to access and use the TaskStream system to evaluate student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty menu, select assessments to evaluate, score student work using rubrics, and generate reports on evaluation results. Key functions covered include evaluating individual submissions, using quick score to evaluate multiple students at once, and accessing evaluation summaries.
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate secondary education students' work. It outlines the multi-step login and navigation process. Key steps include selecting programs and assessments to evaluate, accessing student submissions and rubrics, scoring student work, and generating evaluation reports. The goal is to guide faculty evaluators efficiently through the TaskStream interface and evaluation workflow.
Ssets ebd ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform for evaluating student work. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty homepage, select assessments to evaluate, score student work using rubrics, and generate reports on evaluation results. The instructions are accompanied by screenshots to illustrate each step of the process.
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform for evaluating student work and assessments. It outlines the steps to log in to TaskStream via single sign-on, navigate to the faculty homepage, select programs and student work to evaluate, and use the rubrics and quick scoring features to provide feedback and finalize evaluation submissions. Generating reports on completed evaluations is also described.
Evaluation Managers
The Evaluation Manager role oversees and manages program evaluations. There are five permission levels for Evaluation Managers - Oversee Evaluations, All Access Evaluator, Reconcile Evaluations, Program Setup, and Generate Reports. When enrolling an Evaluation Manager, the permissions they receive can be customized. Common support issues include Evaluation Managers looking in their Evaluator tab instead of Manager tab, or not having the requisite permissions even in the Manager tab.
Assessment Tools
This document provides an overview and instructions for using various assessment tools in the VLE, including creating assignments, using the grade center, and Turnitin for originality checking and leaving feedback. It discusses how to create assignments and student submission links, access and grade submissions in the grade center, set up Turnitin assignments for students to submit work, interpret Turnitin originality reports to check for plagiarism, and use GradeMark to leave comments and feedback on student submissions.
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_2
This document provides instructions for faculty at GW University to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate secondary education English students' work. It outlines a 12-step process for faculty to log in to GWeb, access the TaskStream link, search for students, select assessments to evaluate, access and score student work and rubrics, and submit evaluations. It also describes an alternate QuickScore method for simultaneously evaluating multiple students' work using a single online form.
Reading and literacy TS faculty instructional guide
This document provides instructions for faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate student work. It outlines the multi-step process for logging into TaskStream via the university's information system, navigating to the evaluation tools, selecting specific assessments or students to review, and using either the individual evaluation or QuickScore method to provide feedback and scores for student submissions. Faculty are directed to contact the university's TaskStream administrators or the platform's support team if they need additional help using TaskStream.
Working with app - example vacation request
The document provides an overview of working with apps in the Ribily Platform. It describes the key sections and functions, including navigating to apps, submitting a vacation request form, the approval workflow process that routes tasks to managers and HR with status updates, and the form and comment fields available at each stage. The process allows managers to approve, comment or reassign tasks, and routes approved requests to HR for final approval and audit tracking throughout the stages.
Working with app example vacation request
Creating an app on Ribily Part 1
Create business apps essential for your business within hours. No IT skills needed.
Ed admin ts faculty instructional guide
This document provides instructions for GW faculty to access and use the TaskStream platform to evaluate student work. It outlines the following steps:
1) Logging into the GWeb info system single sign-on as faculty
2) Accessing the TaskStream link through the faculty menu
3) Navigating to different areas within TaskStream to either evaluate previous or current student work
4) Searching for and selecting students' assessments to evaluate
5) Using the rubric to provide scores and feedback on students' work
6) Submitting evaluations either one by one or simultaneously for multiple students using the QuickScore method
7) Contact information for assistance
Reviewing requirements
This document provides an overview of conducting reviews in IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation. It describes preparing for a review by creating either a formal or informal review from a collection or individual artifacts. It outlines the review lifecycle and roles. Participants can complete a review by approving, disapproving, or abstaining from artifacts. Once all participants are finished, the review creator can finalize the review. The goal of reviews is to catch errors early and reduce rework through collaboration and feedback on requirements.
Similar to Submitting for review (20)
Sec ed esl fl_ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed esl fl_ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed math ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed social studies ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Bil sped ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Bil sped ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Rdg lit ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed english ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Ssets ebd ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Ssets ebd ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Sec ed science ts faculty instructional guide_revised 10.18.13
Reading and literacy TS faculty instructional guide
Reading and literacy TS faculty instructional guide
More from taskstream
Customer service prof dev 2015
The document discusses the importance of customer service and provides tips for effectively handling difficult customers. It emphasizes being responsive, reliable, and respectful. When dealing with rude customers, the key is to remain calm, not take things personally, actively listen and sympathize, apologize gracefully, and find a solution. The document also discusses different customer personality types and avoiding common errors like making assumptions without considering context. Good customer service requires understanding situations from the customer's perspective.
AMS support tiers
Tier 1 provides support for basic account creations, adding affiliations, and checking out areas to add content to workspaces. Tier 2 assists with single sign-on account creations, hierarchy changes, coordinator permissions, special site processes, canceling reviews, troubleshooting non-bug issues, organizational goal sets, and general workspace management. Tier 3 handles organizational area creations by creating batches and manager accounts, setting up sandboxes for guest accounts, and developing custom guides, and requires requests to go through the AMS implementation team.
AMS coordinators
This document outlines activities for an Assessment Coordinator role in AMS. It describes creating templates for assessment plans and workspaces to structure how degree programs document their assessment processes. It also covers distributing goal sets, running reports, and reviewing faculty submissions. The coordinator role ensures an institution complies with accreditation standards by demonstrating a cyclical assessment process for academic and non-academic programs through AMS documentation.
Integration Document
This document provides troubleshooting tips for various single sign-on (SSO) methods in Taskstream, including Blackboard SSO, LTI SSO, SAML SSO, Shibboleth SSO, CampusCruiser SSO, CAS SSO, TS API SSO, and Web Service Token SSO. For each method, it identifies what attribute is used to determine SSO (e.g. PK ID for Blackboard, name and email for LTI/SAML) and recommends checking for duplicate accounts or ensuring attribute values match between the portal and Taskstream if SSO fails. It also provides tips for specific processes like updating PK IDs in Blackboard or handling duplicate CampusCruiser Person
The taskstream enterprise data hub moodle
The document describes how Moodle, a learning management system, can connect to Taskstream, an assessment management system. The Moodle administrator sets up the initial connection, while the assessment program manager links specific Moodle course sections to Taskstream assignments. Students access and submit Taskstream assessments through their Moodle courses, and faculty evaluate the submissions and send grades back to the Moodle gradebook.
The taskstream enterprise data hub canvas
Canvas and Taskstream allow students to access and complete assessments in Taskstream directly from their Canvas course. Faculty can then evaluate student submissions in Taskstream and send grades back to the Canvas gradebook. The connection between the two systems is set up by the institution's administrators and coordinators.
The taskstream enterprise data hub blackboard
The document describes the connection between Blackboard and Taskstream, allowing students to access and complete Taskstream assessments from their Blackboard course. Faculty can then evaluate student submissions in Taskstream and send grades back to the Blackboard gradebook. The Blackboard administrator and Taskstream coordinator set up the connections between courses, assignments, and systems.
Quick start guide field placement
This document provides a summary of a quick-start guide for field placement database administration in Taskstream. It discusses setting up a new field placement database or editing an existing one. Key areas covered include permissions, terminology, selecting fields, and establishing associations between placements and academic programs/courses. The guide provides instructions for customizing the database to meet an organization's specific needs and terminology.
Resetting the submit to pearson button
There have been increased requests from leads to allow edTPA students to resubmit work to Pearson if they uploaded corrupted files or want to change files before final submission. The submit to Pearson button for a student can be re-enabled in the student administration system by selecting the student and choosing to reset the submission button, which allows further uploads as long as the student has not fully submitted to Pearson.
Quick start program activity reports
The document provides instructions for running Program Activity Reports in Taskstream. It describes how to generate reports for all authors, a single author, or authors grouped by evaluator. The report displays authors' progress and status in different areas of a program. It can show details on individual authors' submissions and evaluations for a given area. The report data can be filtered and exported to Excel for further analysis.
Quick start guide - multi-program status reports - copy
The document provides instructions for generating a Multi-Program Status Report in Taskstream. It describes how to generate a report for a single individual or group of individuals to view their enrollment status, submission counts, and evaluation completion across one or more programs. The report displays summary and detailed information about requirements submitted, evaluated, and pending evaluation for each program an individual is enrolled in. It also indicates their overall completion status.
Performance by DRF category report
This document provides instructions for running and saving a Performance by DRF Category Report in Taskstream. The report shows performance for each requirement and category in a DRF and can be generated for individual participants, all participants, or subgroups. The report results include a main summary, individual category/requirement details, and author performance details. Saved reports can be given a name and description and shared with other coordinators.
Creating a DRF template
The document provides instructions for using the Directed Response Folio (DRF) Assessment System to design assessment templates. It discusses how to create and customize DRF templates which define work requirements and methods of evaluation. Templates are organized in a three-level structure of general information, categories, and requirements. The DRF Template Builder allows customizing this structure and assigning evaluation methods.
Broadview Call Center Agent Guide
This document provides an agent quick start guide for OfficeSuite call center services. It outlines how agents can sign in and out of queue duty to receive calls either from their phone using an ACD sign in/out button or through a web browser by selecting "Go Ready" to sign in and "Sign Out" to sign out. Agents should sign in and out of queue duty at least once per day in order to receive or stop receiving calls.
More from taskstream (14)
Quick start guide - multi-program status reports - copy
Quick start guide - multi-program status reports - copy
Recently uploaded
UI5con 2024 - Bring Your Own Design System
How do you combine the OpenUI5/SAPUI5 programming model with a design system that makes its controls available as Web Components? Since OpenUI5/SAPUI5 1.120, the framework supports the integration of any Web Components. This makes it possible, for example, to natively embed own Web Components of your design system which are created with Stencil. The integration embeds the Web Components in a way that they can be used naturally in XMLViews, like with standard UI5 controls, and can be bound with data binding. Learn how you can also make use of the Web Components base class in OpenUI5/SAPUI5 to also integrate your Web Components and get inspired by the solution to generate a custom UI5 library providing the Web Components control wrappers for the native ones.
Hand Rolled Applicative User Validation Code Kata
Could you use a simple piece of Scala validation code (granted, a very simplistic one too!) that you can rewrite, now and again, to refresh your basic understanding of Applicative operators <*>, <*, *>?
The goal is not to write perfect code showcasing validation, but rather, to provide a small, rough-and ready exercise to reinforce your muscle-memory.
Despite its grandiose-sounding title, this deck consists of just three slides showing the Scala 3 code to be rewritten whenever the details of the operators begin to fade away.
The code is my rough and ready translation of a Haskell user-validation program found in a book called Finding Success (and Failure) in Haskell - Fall in love with applicative functors.
openEuler Case Study - The Journey to Supply Chain Security
openEuler Case Study - The Journey to Supply Chain Security
How Can Hiring A Mobile App Development Company Help Your Business Grow?
ToXSL Technologies is an award-winning Mobile App Development Company in Dubai that helps businesses reshape their digital possibilities with custom app services. As a top app development company in Dubai, we offer highly engaging iOS & Android app solutions. https://rb.gy/necdnt
Atelier - Innover avec l’IA Générative et les graphes de connaissances
Atelier - Innover avec l’IA Générative et les graphes de connaissances
Allez au-delà du battage médiatique autour de l’IA et découvrez des techniques pratiques pour utiliser l’IA de manière responsable à travers les données de votre organisation. Explorez comment utiliser les graphes de connaissances pour augmenter la précision, la transparence et la capacité d’explication dans les systèmes d’IA générative. Vous partirez avec une expérience pratique combinant les relations entre les données et les LLM pour apporter du contexte spécifique à votre domaine et améliorer votre raisonnement.
Amenez votre ordinateur portable et nous vous guiderons sur la mise en place de votre propre pile d’IA générative, en vous fournissant des exemples pratiques et codés pour démarrer en quelques minutes.
Neo4j - Product Vision and Knowledge Graphs - GraphSummit Paris
Dr. Jesús Barrasa, Head of Solutions Architecture for EMEA, Neo4j
Découvrez les dernières innovations de Neo4j, et notamment les dernières intégrations cloud et les améliorations produits qui font de Neo4j un choix essentiel pour les développeurs qui créent des applications avec des données interconnectées et de l’IA générative.
Oracle Database 19c New Features for DBAs and Developers.pptx
Oracle Database 19c New Features for DBAs and Developers. This video you can watch from my youtube channel at https://youtu.be/m-F-mZA3MkU
How to write a program in any programming language
How to write a program in any programming language
Odoo ERP Vs. Traditional ERP Systems – A Comparative Analysis
When it is all about ERP solutions, companies typically meet their needs with common ERP solutions like SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft Dynamics. These big players have demonstrated that ERP systems can be either simple or highly comprehensive. This remains true today, but there are new factors to consider, including a promising new contender in the market that’s Odoo. This blog compares Odoo ERP with traditional ERP systems and explains why many companies now see Odoo ERP as the best choice.
What are ERP Systems?
An ERP, or Enterprise Resource Planning, system provides your company with valuable information to help you make better decisions and boost your ROI. You should choose an ERP system based on your company’s specific needs. For instance, if you run a manufacturing or retail business, you will need an ERP system that efficiently manages inventory. A consulting firm, on the other hand, would benefit from an ERP system that enhances daily operations. Similarly, eCommerce stores would select an ERP system tailored to their needs.
Because different businesses have different requirements, ERP system functionalities can vary. Among the various ERP systems available, Odoo ERP is considered one of the best in the ERp market with more than 12 million global users today.
Odoo is an open-source ERP system initially designed for small to medium-sized businesses but now suitable for a wide range of companies. Odoo offers a scalable and configurable point-of-sale management solution and allows you to create customised modules for specific industries. Odoo is gaining more popularity because it is built in a way that allows easy customisation, has a user-friendly interface, and is affordable. Here, you will cover the main differences and get to know why Odoo is gaining attention despite the many other ERP systems available in the market.
Introducing Crescat - Event Management Software for Venues, Festivals and Eve...
Crescat is industry-trusted event management software, built by event professionals for event professionals. Founded in 2017, we have three key products tailored for the live event industry.
Crescat Event for concert promoters and event agencies. Crescat Venue for music venues, conference centers, wedding venues, concert halls and more. And Crescat Festival for festivals, conferences and complex events.
With a wide range of popular features such as event scheduling, shift management, volunteer and crew coordination, artist booking and much more, Crescat is designed for customisation and ease-of-use.
Over 125,000 events have been planned in Crescat and with hundreds of customers of all shapes and sizes, from boutique event agencies through to international concert promoters, Crescat is rigged for success. What's more, we highly value feedback from our users and we are constantly improving our software with updates, new features and improvements.
If you plan events, run a venue or produce festivals and you're looking for ways to make your life easier, then we have a solution for you. Try our software for free or schedule a no-obligation demo with one of our product specialists today at crescat.io
Microservice Teams - How the cloud changes the way we work
A lot of technical challenges and complexity come with building a cloud-native and distributed architecture. The way we develop backend software has fundamentally changed in the last ten years. Managing a microservices architecture demands a lot of us to ensure observability and operational resiliency. But did you also change the way you run your development teams?
Sven will talk about Atlassian’s journey from a monolith to a multi-tenanted architecture and how it affected the way the engineering teams work. You will learn how we shifted to service ownership, moved to more autonomous teams (and its challenges), and established platform and enablement teams.
LORRAINE ANDREI_LEQUIGAN_HOW TO USE ZOOM
Zoom is a comprehensive platform designed to connect individuals and teams efficiently. With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zoom has become a go-to solution for virtual communication and collaboration. It offers a range of tools, including virtual meetings, team chat, VoIP phone systems, online whiteboards, and AI companions, to streamline workflows and enhance productivity.
Neo4j - Product Vision and Knowledge Graphs - GraphSummit Paris
Dr. Jesús Barrasa, Head of Solutions Architecture for EMEA, Neo4j
Découvrez les dernières innovations de Neo4j, et notamment les dernières intégrations cloud et les améliorations produits qui font de Neo4j un choix essentiel pour les développeurs qui créent des applications avec des données interconnectées et de l’IA générative.
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - Introducción a Argo CD
Charla impartida en el evento de "KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara" para celebrar el 10mo. aniversario de Kubernetes #kuberTENes #celebr8k8s #k8s
socradar-q1-2024-aviation-industry-report.pdf
SOCRadar's Aviation Industry Q1 Incident Report is out now!
The aviation industry has always been a prime target for cybercriminals due to its critical infrastructure and high stakes. In the first quarter of 2024, the sector faced an alarming surge in cybersecurity threats, revealing its vulnerabilities and the relentless sophistication of cyber attackers.
SOCRadar’s Aviation Industry, Quarterly Incident Report, provides an in-depth analysis of these threats, detected and examined through our extensive monitoring of hacker forums, Telegram channels, and dark web platforms.
OpenMetadata Community Meeting - 5th June 2024
The OpenMetadata Community Meeting was held on June 5th, 2024. In this meeting, we discussed about the data quality capabilities that are integrated with the Incident Manager, providing a complete solution to handle your data observability needs. Watch the end-to-end demo of the data quality features.
* How to run your own data quality framework
* What is the performance impact of running data quality frameworks
* How to run the test cases in your own ETL pipelines
* How the Incident Manager is integrated
* Get notified with alerts when test cases fail
Watch the meeting recording here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbNOje0kf6E
Requirement Traceability in Xen Functional Safety
Using OpenFastTrace to trace requirements in Xen functional safety
Using Query Store in Azure PostgreSQL to Understand Query Performance
Microsoft has added an excellent new extension in PostgreSQL on their Azure Platform. This session, presented at Posette 2024, covers what Query Store is and the types of information you can get out of it.
Recently uploaded (20)
openEuler Case Study - The Journey to Supply Chain Security
openEuler Case Study - The Journey to Supply Chain Security
How Can Hiring A Mobile App Development Company Help Your Business Grow?
How Can Hiring A Mobile App Development Company Help Your Business Grow?
Atelier - Innover avec l’IA Générative et les graphes de connaissances
Atelier - Innover avec l’IA Générative et les graphes de connaissances
Neo4j - Product Vision and Knowledge Graphs - GraphSummit Paris
Neo4j - Product Vision and Knowledge Graphs - GraphSummit Paris
Oracle Database 19c New Features for DBAs and Developers.pptx
Oracle Database 19c New Features for DBAs and Developers.pptx
How to write a program in any programming language
How to write a program in any programming language
Odoo ERP Vs. Traditional ERP Systems – A Comparative Analysis
Odoo ERP Vs. Traditional ERP Systems – A Comparative Analysis
Introducing Crescat - Event Management Software for Venues, Festivals and Eve...
Introducing Crescat - Event Management Software for Venues, Festivals and Eve...
Microservice Teams - How the cloud changes the way we work
Microservice Teams - How the cloud changes the way we work
Neo4j - Product Vision and Knowledge Graphs - GraphSummit Paris
Neo4j - Product Vision and Knowledge Graphs - GraphSummit Paris
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - Introducción a Argo CD
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - Introducción a Argo CD
Using Query Store in Azure PostgreSQL to Understand Query Performance
Using Query Store in Azure PostgreSQL to Understand Query Performance
Submitting for review
- 1. Submitting for Review What does it mean? • In Taskstream, Submitting for Review means that you are requesting comments or informal feedback, as opposed to a formal evaluation. • With reviews, you do not receive a score or a formal indication of whether you passed an assignment. Submitting for review just enables the Reviewer to view the assignment and write comments on the work.
- 2. There are two ways to Submit for Review: • One way is to submit an artifact created in Taskstream such as a lesson or a portfolio. • The other way is submit a single requirement or multiple requirements in a DRF Program.
- 3. Submitting a Lesson or Unit For Review When the lesson or unit is open, the Request Feedback button is on the upper right-hand side of the area.
- 4. Check the box next to the reviewer(s) and click Submit for Review
- 5. Once the lesson or unit is submitted for Review, you are able to add comments to your review for each section of the lesson or unit
- 6. The comments are found in these sections.
- 7. To submit work for review in a DRF program, you would click the Request Comments button on the upper right-hand side of the requirement area
- 8. In the pop-up window, the assignment you’re working on will be checked by default, but you can submit some or all of the assignments. Then click continue.
- 9. Check the boxes next to the reviewer or reviewers that will be commenting on the assignment and click Continue.
- 10. After submitting for Review, the Author is taken to the Comments tab where they can receive comments from Reviewer(s) as well as respond to comments in a discussion board format.
- 11. What needs to happen for an Author to Submit for Review? • The Author must be enrolled in a program where Reviewing is enabled. • The Author and Reviewer(s) could also be enrolled in a Collaborative Program, which only has Reviewing enabled If the program uses Grouping, the Author must be grouped with a Reviewer in order to submit for Review.