The Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations (NATA) was established in 2011 to facilitate collaboration between higher education associations. NATA partners included ACODE, ascilite, CADAD, HERDSA, ODLAA, AARNet, and NetSpot. The network aimed to disseminate best practices, support network leadership, and promote Office for Learning and Teaching activities. Key outcomes included research on network leadership, resources on academic networking, and promotion of Good Practice Reports. By bringing together leaders from different associations and supporting collaboration, NATA helped foster sharing of expertise to enhance teaching practices across the sector.

1. A network of networks: supporting
good practice in network leadership
and the dissemination of good practice
in tertiary education
The Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations
(NATA)
Final Report 2014
Host institution: University of Southern Queensland
Network partners: ACODE, ascilite, CADAD, HERDSA, ODLAA,
AARNet, NetSpot
Project team and partner representatives: Mike Keppell (network
leader), Gordon Suddaby (network leader), Natasha Hard (project
manager), Karen Halley (administration/ACODE), Tom Prebble
(project evaluator), Helen Carter (ACODE), Caroline Steel (ascilite),
Kylie Readman (CADAD), Shelda Debowski (HERDSA), Som Naidu
(ODLAA), James Sankar (AARNet), Kim Edgar (NetSpot)
Report authors: Mike Keppell, Gordon Suddaby, Natasha Hard
<www.nataonthenet.blogspot.com>
Funding for the production of this report has been provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and
Teaching. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government
Office for Learning and Teaching.

2. Network summary
The Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations (NATA) was established in August 2011
under the original title of the National Networking Initiative (NNI). The Australian Learning
and Teaching Council (ALTC) legacy project aimed to facilitate a sustainable collaborative
network between established higher education associations.
Network of Australasian Tertiary Association partners:
• Lead associations: Australasian Council on Open, Distance and E-Learning (ACODE),
Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ascilite)
• Collaborative partners: Council of Australian Directors of Academic Development (CADAD),
Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), Open and
Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA)
• Enabling partners: Australia's Academic and Research Network (AARNET), NetSpot, Office for
Learning and Teaching (OLT).
The project included two network leaders, a project manager, an external evaluator and
partner association representatives. Partner association representatives were nominated by
their association, however, they predominantly consisted of the leader or president of the
respective association. This role was critical to ensuring that the direction and activities of
the network were shared within their association and that NATA related news was
communicated back to individual partner associations. NATA objectives focused on bringing
together kindred associations to develop an integrated higher education network. This
network would support these kindred associations to work together to promote OLT/ALTC
activities, disseminate good practice and support each other to meet their objectives with
respect to learning and teaching. The development of 8 NATA Key Objectives provided
tangible foci for network activities such as the NATA research project, partner projects and
dissemination of the Good Practice Reports. As the project developed, network leadership,
member engagement, the effective use of technology, promotion of sectoral issues and
possibilities around dissemination of good practice emerged as the key value propositions
for network partners.
NATA outcomes and deliverables:
• NATA Blog <http://www.nataonthenet.blogspot.com> and Twitter account
(@NATAonthenet).
• Keppell, M., Suddaby, G. & Hard, N. (2014). 10 Principles for Good Practice in Network
Leadership. NATA network leadership research output (see page 5).
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwrLxADj8ERfYzZNS3R0QkNPemM/edit>
• ALTC / OLT Good Practice Report eResources.
• Debowski, S. (2013). Tips for Leading Academic Networks. HERDSA Partner project output.
<http://www.slideshare.net/SheldaDebowski/tips-for-leading-academic-networksdeboswki-2013>.
• Debowski, S. with Keppell, M. & Hard, N. (in press). Leading Academic Networks. Milperra,
NSW: HERDSA.
• A range of other outputs from NATA partner projects that are being undertaken by ACODE,
ascilite, CADAD and ODLAA are currently being developed. These resources will address
issues and/or practices in engaging with and supporting association members in the digital
age.
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
2

3. All resources will be accessible on the NATA blog with the exception of the HERDSA Guide,
which will be available through HERDSA in early 2014.
Contribution to learning and teaching
The Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations operates at a macro level several steps
removed from the lecture teacher-student interface. However each partner association
consists of members who are practitioners in learning and teaching in tertiary education.
The NATA has contributed to learning and teaching in the following ways.
By supporting partner associations to improve their networking practices specifically in
the areas of network leadership and communication technologies, NATA sought to
improve the experiences and professional development opportunities afforded to partner
associations members (educators).
Whilst all NATA partners have a general learning and teaching focus, network leadership
and the effective use of communication technologies emerged as the key issues of mutual
interest and potential value. By working collaboratively to explore and address these
common concerns, the collective actions of NATA enhanced the ability of partner
associations to effectively cooperate in addressing these issues. Consequently, partner
associations have been assisted in meeting their learning and teaching objectives.
NATA promoted a wide range of learning and teaching related materials across the sector
through an openly accessible website, Twitter profile and use of network partner
communication channels.
The NATA blog and Twitter communication has emphasised project based information,
however, NATA has effectively utilised its communication channels to highlight a variety of
learning and teaching resources such as publications, OLT supported networks, webinars,
conferences, calls for papers and OLT funding opportunities. With approximately 12,000
views since March 2012, and a growing audience, the NATA blog has validated its use as a
dissemination vehicle. In combination with the NATA Twitter profile and access to partner
association communication channels, the NATA widely promoted learning and teaching.
By supporting new connections between people, organisations and networks, NATA
helped foster the sharing of experiences, expertise and resources.
The NATA brought together the leaders of a range of learning and teaching associations who
had not previously engaged with each other in a focussed and sustained way. Due to the
underlying similarities of these associations this collaborative project provided scope for the
sharing of experiences, expertise and resources of common relevance. New relationships,
resources and independent collaborations between partners have emerged which support
learning and teaching.
The active dissemination of the ALTC / OLT Good Practice Reports (GPRs) aimed to
improve the practice of educators by increasing awareness and engagement with Good
Practice in Learning and Teaching.
The GPRs were designed to foster the sharing of experiences and outcomes from ALTC / OLT
funded projects. However, these reports remained significantly underutilised. As such, NATA
adopted a multidimensional approach to their promotion. Webinars, conference
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
3

4. presentations and workshops were conducted whilst short promotional eResource videos
were developed to enhance engagement with the GPRs. By extending engagement with the
reports and communicating the value they afford, NATA sought to improve educational
practices.
Factors contributing to productive networking
Network achievements
1. NATA brought together a range of stakeholders in the Australasian Tertiary sector who
had not previously collaborated in a sustained way by enabling them to explore synergies.
2. NATA established an active website and Twitter profile which promoted the NATA and its
activities along with a wide range of learning and teaching related material.
3. NATA successfully supported network partners to engage in projects that would deliver
value to their associations and members whilst offering general value to NATA partners.
4. NATA has supported the development of a range of freely accessible resources on
effective network communications including social media and digital technologies.
5. NATA activities expanded the understanding of network leadership and developed
practical resources to support future network leaders.
6. The network was not limited by the disparate nature of members as a virtual project
management approach was successfully developed and enacted.
7. The NATA enhanced awareness of the ALTC / OLT Good Practice Reports within the
Australasian Tertiary sector through adopting a multimodal approach.
Effective methods of networking: Lessons learnt
• It is important to take the time and work with network partners to ensure that there is a
clear and shared vision for the network. This was a particular challenge to the NATA as it
brought together diverse stakeholders and independent groups for the first time.
• The role of a critical friend is highly important as networks involve various parties, interests
and tensions. A credible evaluator or critical friend is able to bring an objective
perspective to network discussions.
• Establishing regular and appropriate communication with key stakeholders is essential. For
NATA it took considerable time to establish the correct balance between engaging
partners and overwhelming them with content and time demands.
• Relevant communication and activity are vital for member engagement. To foster network
engagement you need to be proactive and persistent if you wish to engage people with
your vision.
• An effective and current web presence is essential. Developing a readily accessible and
active web presence that provides a means for people to better understand and engage
with your network is fundamental to establishing a robust identity.
• Effective dissemination underpins the success of networks. Finding an ideal balance of
dissemination remains problematic. Supranets (networks of networks) such as NATA have
access to large audiences and effectively communicating what is needed remains a critical
challenge and opportunity.
• Effective networks are based on collaboration. It is important to reflect upon the ongoing
value of collaboration at key points as the context in which networks are established
continually changes. Understanding how such changes impact upon the network and key
stakeholders is important for network sustainability.
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
4

5. • It is important not to underestimate the importance of face-to-face meetings for developing
relationships. The NATA had three opportunities for face-to-face meetings between
network partners which were invaluable in streamlining processes, building collegial
rapport and advancing network discussion.
• Understand and account for partner differences and similarities. Despite operating in the
same context and having similar foci, on occasions network partners appeared more
dissimilar than similar. This often required strong but considered facilitation.
• Succession planning is integral to maintaining continuity for network engagement. To reduce
discontinuity and knowledge slippage, appropriate succession planning and induction
practices need to be in place to minimise the inevitable changes of those involved in the
network.
Networking recommendations
The recommendations below are derived from the small-scale research project conducted
by the NATA titled ‘An investigation into network leadership within established Australasian
tertiary education associations’. These 10 principles are designed for tertiary education
networks, especially academic associations due to the scope of the study and NATA
experience. However, it is hoped that they will be applicable to a wide range of educational
networks which face similar challenges and contextual issues.
10 principles for good practice in network leadership
1. Network leaders need to have strong personal networks to help inform/contextualise
network practices and assist network dissemination.
2. Leaders need to have a clear understanding of, and focus on the priorities and challenges
for their association now and into the future.
3. The leaders of networks need to be cognisant of the needs and interests of their members
so that activities and communication are relevant and offer value.
4. Network leaders need to understand the capacity of executive members and have realistic
expectations regarding workloads and timeframes given the volunteer nature of their
involvement.
5. Executive members need to have clearly defined roles and responsibilities in order to
foster ownership and provide a specific focus to their association-based activities.
6. The development of rapport between executive members is critical for effective
functioning: face-to-face interaction can assist the establishment of working relationships
which can be strengthened through the use of communication technologies.
7. Systems need to be in place to ensure that association knowledge and experience is
maintained whilst new and innovative ideas are supported.
8. Networks require a culture of vibrancy and transparency if they are to be sustainable and
maintain a healthy and engaged membership.
9. Communication needs to be fit for purpose both in mode and message: consistency and
the appropriate use of technology can support a sense of connection and the
development of a community of trust.
10. Establishing financial security enables strategic allocation of funds for activities aligned
with association priorities.
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
5

6. Barriers to productive networking
Key challenges and network responses
Turnover of network members.
The turnover of partner representatives often resulted in discontinuity and disengagement
of partner associations as new representatives needed to be familiarised with the purpose,
and foci of the NATA. This process of induction proved a particular challenge due to the
complex nature of the network and its activities. To streamline this process communication
regarding network activities was enhanced, especially through the use of the semi-regular
‘NATA Update’ on the network blog. This complemented the NATA news report by partner
representatives back to their executives and association members. NATA also adopted
greater inclusivity in regular meetings and developed a range of documents outlining the
NATA’s strategy and key objectives to increase transparency and minimise the disruption of
personnel changes.
Establishing and sustaining a shared network vision.
The NATA project proposal was developed over a short time frame and the project involved
the formation of a new network comprising a diverse range of stakeholders. This context
meant that there was a limited ability for the project leaders and network partners to fully
engage in conceptualising the network prior to the project commencement. Considerable
time during the project was dedicated to clarifying and developing a shared network
identity rather than actively pursuing project objectives and activities. Utilising time at the
face-to-face meetings to accelerate this process proved effective particularly in relation to
collaborative development of eight operational key objectives.
Maintaining the ongoing engagement of network partners.
Engaging partners who voluntarily donated their time to participate in network activities
was an ongoing challenge. Many of the partner representatives already volunteer their time
to support their respective association. By developing a supranet, such as NATA, it created
yet another responsibility on top of their already busy workloads. Throughout the project,
the NATA communicated and reinforced the value that participation in the NATA offered to
the individual involved as well as their respective partner association. Ownership and
responsibility regarding partner projects also assisted partner engagement and a sense of
commitment to NATA.
Timeframes and contextual changes in developing a model for a sustainable network.
The development of a sustainable model for NATA beyond the funded period was
complicated by the protracted phase of network establishment and clarification. Moreover,
the conclusion of the funded NATA project altered the context and parameters for future
engagement. A new network model needed to be collaboratively conceptualised and the
value proposition of ongoing involvement for key stakeholders needed to be made explicit.
Challenges of networking in general
• Competing priorities and available time of those actively involved in the network.
• Establishing a common identity that is clearly articulated and accepted by network partners.
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
6

7. • Developing an effective internal and external communication strategy that communicates
the value of the network.
• Ensuring that the network delivers sufficient value to key stakeholders in order to maintain
member engagement and be sustainable.
• Effectively managing the different perspectives, priorities and opinions of network members
and partner associations.
What the network offers
What the NATA offers to potential members and stakeholders continues to be an ongoing
consideration. In building clarity around network sustainability, a document based on a
revised network model was collaboratively developed at the end of 2013 outlining the value
proposition for an ongoing NATA.
This revised model centres on improving engagement through good practice in network
leadership. The key objectives of this revised model are provided below.
Key objective 1 - Improve network leadership
• Support tertiary association/network leaders (mentoring, processes and leadership skills).
• Improve executive functioning (processes, transitions, inductions).
• Enhance social media use and communication practices within networks and associations.
• Learn from and share related experiences and common challenges.
• Provide a forum for consensus building on key issues facing the sector.
Key objective 2 – Support OLT networking
• Improve connections between the sector and OLT.
• Engage a greater audience in the activities and outcomes of the OLT around learning and
teaching.
• Provide a forum for the dissemination of OLT outcomes and activities.
Potential value of ongoing collaboration for key stakeholders
• Network / tertiary association leaders (partner association leaders): Leaders would have
the opportunity to learn about good practice in networking and network leadership.
Additionally, they would be able to explore common challenges and possible solutions,
share resources and provide mutual support such as mentorship for new leaders.
• Networks / tertiary associations (partner associations): Partner associations would have a
stronger voice and greater influence in the sector. Avoiding potential risks, improving
executive functioning, benchmarking, coordinating and collaborating regarding events,
sharing resources and clarifying understandings of the spaces each association occupies
within the sector are all valuable outcomes of collaboration under this model.
• Tertiary education institutions: Leadership development and the enhanced profile of staff,
improved business intelligence, access to innovative developments in learning and
teaching and reputational currency are possible outcomes for tertiary education
institutions with staff involved in a continuing NATA.
• The office for learning and teaching and government: The revised model provides OLT with
the opportunity to gain access to early trends emerging in the sector and a forum for the
delivery of messages and efficient dissemination. It also promises to build an enhanced
profile for the OLT and provide a conduit for receiving comprehensive feedback from the
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
7

8. sector about issues and concerns arising.
• The Australasian tertiary education sector: The sector stands to benefit through the
provision of a cohesive and authoritative voice, engagement with senior executives,
‘crowd sourcing’ opportunities and an increased awareness of and ability to address
emerging issues and trends. It also promises to increase the profile of learning and
teaching, improve dissemination and increase linkages with international networks.
A network of networks: supporting good practice in network leadership and the dissemination of good practice
in learning and teaching
8