Descriptive statistics are methods of describing the characteristics of a data set. It includes calculating things such as the average of the data, its spread and the shape it produces.
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS: AN INTRODUCTIONJohn Labrador
For instance, we use inferential statistics to try to infer from the sample data what the population might think. Or, we use inferential statistics to make judgments of the probability that an observed difference between groups is a dependable one or one that might have happened by chance in this study.
Qualitative analysis of data. STRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING OBSERVATIONSselvaraj227
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION METHODS CHARACTERISTICS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS APPROACHES TO QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSISPRINCIPLES OF QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSISSTRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING OBSERVATIONS
Descriptive statistics are methods of describing the characteristics of a data set. It includes calculating things such as the average of the data, its spread and the shape it produces.
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS: AN INTRODUCTIONJohn Labrador
For instance, we use inferential statistics to try to infer from the sample data what the population might think. Or, we use inferential statistics to make judgments of the probability that an observed difference between groups is a dependable one or one that might have happened by chance in this study.
Qualitative analysis of data. STRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING OBSERVATIONSselvaraj227
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION METHODS CHARACTERISTICS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS APPROACHES TO QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSISPRINCIPLES OF QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSISSTRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING OBSERVATIONS
Inferential statistics are techniques that allow us to use these samples to make generalizations about the populations from which the samples were drawn. ... The methods of inferential statistics are (1) the estimation of parameter(s) and (2) testing of statistical hypotheses.
This presentation explains the concept of ANOVA, ANCOVA, MANOVA and MANCOVA. This presentation also deals about the procedure to do the ANOVA, ANCOVA and MANOVA with the use of SPSS.
Statistics for Anaesthesiologists covers basic to intermediate level statistics for researchers especially commonly used study designs or tests in Anaesthesiology research.
Inferential statistics are techniques that allow us to use these samples to make generalizations about the populations from which the samples were drawn. ... The methods of inferential statistics are (1) the estimation of parameter(s) and (2) testing of statistical hypotheses.
This presentation explains the concept of ANOVA, ANCOVA, MANOVA and MANCOVA. This presentation also deals about the procedure to do the ANOVA, ANCOVA and MANOVA with the use of SPSS.
Statistics for Anaesthesiologists covers basic to intermediate level statistics for researchers especially commonly used study designs or tests in Anaesthesiology research.
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)DSilvaGraf83
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)
Discussion Forum Instructions:
1. You must post at least three times each week.
2. Your initial post is due Tuesday of each week and the following two post are due before Sunday.
3. All post must be on separate days of the week.
4. Post must be at least 150 words and cite all of your references even it its the book.
Discussion Topic:
Describe how the lives of students with disabilities from culturally and/or linguistically diverse backgrounds have changed since the advent of IDEA. What do you feel are some things that can or should be implemented to better assist with students that have disabilities? Tell me about these ideas and how would you integrate them?
ANOVA
ANOVA
• Analysis of Variance
• Statistical method to analyzes variances to determine if the means from more than
two populations are the same
• compare the between-sample-variation to the within-sample-variation
• If the between-sample-variation is sufficiently large compared to the within-sample-
variation it is likely that the population means are statistically different
• Compares means (group differences) among levels of factors. No
assumptions are made regarding how the factors are related
• Residual related assumptions are the same as with simple regression
• Explanatory variables can be qualitative or quantitative but are categorized
for group investigations. These variables are often referred to as factors
with levels (category levels)
ANOVA Assumptions
• Assume populations , from which the response values for the groups
are drawn, are normally distributed
• Assumes populations have equal variances
• Can compare the ratio of smallest and largest sample standard deviations.
Between .05 and 2 are typically not considered evidence of a violation
assumption
• Assumes the response data are independent
• For large sample sizes, or for factor level sample sizes that are equal,
the ANOVA test is robust to assumption violations of normality and
unequal variances
ANOVA and Variance
Fixed or Random Factors
• A factor is fixed if its levels are chosen before the ANOVA investigation
begins
• Difference in groups are only investigated for the specific pre-selected factors
and levels
• A factor is random if its levels are choosen randomly from the
population before the ANOVA investigation begins
Randomization
• Assigning subjects to treatment groups or treatments to subjects
randomly reduces the chance of bias selecting results
ANOVA hypotheses statements
One-way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
Hypotheses statements
Test statistic
=
𝐵𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
Under the null hypothesis both the between and within group variances estimate the
variance of the random error so the ratio is assumed to be close to 1.
Null Hypothesis
Alternate Hypothesis
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA Excel Output
Treatme
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)DMoseStaton39
(Individuals With Disabilities Act Transformation Over the Years)
Discussion Forum Instructions:
1. You must post at least three times each week.
2. Your initial post is due Tuesday of each week and the following two post are due before Sunday.
3. All post must be on separate days of the week.
4. Post must be at least 150 words and cite all of your references even it its the book.
Discussion Topic:
Describe how the lives of students with disabilities from culturally and/or linguistically diverse backgrounds have changed since the advent of IDEA. What do you feel are some things that can or should be implemented to better assist with students that have disabilities? Tell me about these ideas and how would you integrate them?
ANOVA
ANOVA
• Analysis of Variance
• Statistical method to analyzes variances to determine if the means from more than
two populations are the same
• compare the between-sample-variation to the within-sample-variation
• If the between-sample-variation is sufficiently large compared to the within-sample-
variation it is likely that the population means are statistically different
• Compares means (group differences) among levels of factors. No
assumptions are made regarding how the factors are related
• Residual related assumptions are the same as with simple regression
• Explanatory variables can be qualitative or quantitative but are categorized
for group investigations. These variables are often referred to as factors
with levels (category levels)
ANOVA Assumptions
• Assume populations , from which the response values for the groups
are drawn, are normally distributed
• Assumes populations have equal variances
• Can compare the ratio of smallest and largest sample standard deviations.
Between .05 and 2 are typically not considered evidence of a violation
assumption
• Assumes the response data are independent
• For large sample sizes, or for factor level sample sizes that are equal,
the ANOVA test is robust to assumption violations of normality and
unequal variances
ANOVA and Variance
Fixed or Random Factors
• A factor is fixed if its levels are chosen before the ANOVA investigation
begins
• Difference in groups are only investigated for the specific pre-selected factors
and levels
• A factor is random if its levels are choosen randomly from the
population before the ANOVA investigation begins
Randomization
• Assigning subjects to treatment groups or treatments to subjects
randomly reduces the chance of bias selecting results
ANOVA hypotheses statements
One-way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
Hypotheses statements
Test statistic
=
𝐵𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒
Under the null hypothesis both the between and within group variances estimate the
variance of the random error so the ratio is assumed to be close to 1.
Null Hypothesis
Alternate Hypothesis
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA Excel Output
Treatme
univariate and bivariate analysis in spss Subodh Khanal
this slide will help to perform various tests in spss targeting univariate and bivariate analysis along with the way of entering and analyzing multiple responses.
This is a lecture on "Hypothesis Testing, Research Questions and Choosing a Statistical Test". It was presented at the Colombo Institute for Research and Psychology. The lecture covers key topics including the different types of data, the process of testing a hypothesis, key forms of inferential statistical tests and how to chose a test based on your research question and sample.
In this presentation, you will differentiate the ANOVA and ANCOVA statistical methods, and identify real-world situations where the ANOVA and ANCOVA methods for statistical inference are applied.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
4. Experimental design
• Between subjects design: Different participants in
each group, e.g. males & females.
• Within subjects design: Same participants in each
group, meaning the same participants perform the
conditions in each of the groups. Also called
“Repeated Measures” design.
4
5. Checking assumptions
You are making assumptions (Annahmen) when you
are performing a statistical test. For a parametric
test your data needs to be:
• Normally distributed
• Homogeneity of variance
• Measured on interval niveau (data is continuous
and equal intervals on the scale represent equal
differences in the measurement) (Scale)
• Independent measurements (no influencements)
5
6. Normal distribution
• Shapiro-Wilk / Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests the
“Nullhypothese” that:
the variabele is normally distributed.
The moment the test is significant…
…your data is significantly not normally distributed.
• Test the normality of the score of each group (e.g. score
females & score males; multiple normality tests).
• If your analysis involves comparing groups, what’s
important is not the overall distribution but the
distribution in each group.
6
7. Normal distribution
• In a big sample size (N>30 per group), use Kolmogorov-
Smirnov. Because Shapiro-Wilk will get significant easy
with little deviations.
• In a small sample size, use Shapiro-Wilk.
In SPSS:
Analyze Descriptive statistics Explore
Variable = Dependent
Plots: Histogram & Normality plots with tests
7
8. Homogeneity of variance
• What is variance?
Variance is a measurement for dispersion
(verbreitung) i.e. how much values differ mutually.
The bigger the variance, the more values differ from
each other and from the mean.
4 – 5 – 6 Mean: 5 Variance: Small
1 - - - 4 - - - - - 10 Mean: 5 Variance: Big
• The sample variance S² is an estimation of the
population variance. The square root out of
sample variance is called standard deviation (SD),
auf Deutsch: “Standardabweichung”.
8
9. Homogeneity of variance
Levene’s tests the “Nullhypothese” that:
the variance (verbreitung) between groups is equal.
When Levene’s test is significant…
… the variances are significantly not equal.
In SPSS: Analyze Descriptive statistics Explore
Variable = Dependent value
Factor list: Predictor / Group
Plots: Spread vs level with Levene Test:
Untransformed
9
10. What if…
My data is not normally distributed and/or
the variances between groups are not
equal?
Deal with
outliers
Data
transformation
N>30 per group,
parametric tests
are quite robust
12. Which test should I choose?
12
Source: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Andy Field, 3rd edition, 2009, SAGE Publications Ltd.
13. The t-test
• The t-test tests whether there is a difference
between the means of two groups
• The independent t-test test whether there is a
difference between two different groups of
participants (between subjects).
Asumptions: your data is normally distributed and
the variances between groups is equal.
• In SPSS: Analyze Compare Means
Independent samples t-test
13
14. The paired t-test
• The dependent t-test, also called paired t-test,
tests whether there is a difference between the
means of two groups with the same participants
(within subjects, repeated measures design).
• Assumption: your data is normally distributed.
You don’t need to check for homogeneity of
variance, since it’s the same group of people.
• In SPSS: Analyze Compare Means Paired
samples t-test
14
15. ANOVA
• What does ANOVA stand for?
ANalysis Of VAriance
Tests whether means of three or more groups differ
from each other.
15
16. One-Way Independent ANOVA
• Between subjects, different participants in each group.
• Asumptions: your data is normally distributed and the
variances between groups is equal.
• In SPSS: Analyze Compare Means One-Way ANOVA
Options: Descriptive, homogeneity of variance test &
means plot.
16
17. One-Way Repeated Measures
ANOVA
• Within subjects design, meaning the same participants
perform the conditions in each of the groups.
• Asumptions: your data is normally distributed and the
variances between groups is equal. However, since we have
the same participants in each group, this variance is now
called “Sphericity” (denoted by ε).
17
18. Factorial Mixed ANOVA
• When you have both a within and between subjects design,
this is called a Factorial Mixed ANOVA.
• For example, you want to test whether there is an blocked /
unblocked effect between subjects (different participants in
each group) AND you want to test whether there is an effect
on old/new/lure words within subjects (same participants in
each group).
• Then you perform an Factorial Mixed ANOVA.
• In SPSS: Add the group as a between-subjects factor
(Nominal) in the Repeated-Measures ANOVA.
Analyze General Linear Model Repeated Measures.
Number of levels = number of groups. Each group should be
it’s own variable. Click define. Between factor = groups.
18
20. Which test should I choose?
20
• I want to test whether females get a higher grade than
males on the Expra exam.
• Outcome variable?
• 1, continous: grade (test score)
• Predictor variable?
• 1: Sex.
• Type & amount of predictor?
• 2 Categories: Male & Female.
• Same or different participants in each category?
• Different.
• Which test? Independent t-test.
21. Which test should I choose?
21
• I want to test whether new words are correctly recognized
as new more often compared to learned words.
• Outcome variable?
• 1, continous: amount pressed new (test score)
• Predictor variable?
• 1: Learning category
• Type & amount of predictor?
• 2 Categories: Learned & New.
• Same or different participants in each category?
• Same.
• Which test? Paired t-test.
22. Which test should I choose?
22
• I want to test whether students in the psychology
department sleep more than students in the medicin and
law department.
• Outcome variable?
• 1, continous: amount of sleep (in minutes)
• Predictor variable?
• 1: Department
• Type & amount of predictor?
• 3 Categories: Psychology, Medicin & Law.
• Same or different participants in each category?
• Different.
• Which test? One-way independent ANOVA.
23. Which test should I choose?
23
• I want to test whether lure words are more often recognized
as old compared to learned words and new words.
• Outcome variable?
• 1, continous: amount pressed old (test score)
• Predictor variable?
• 1: Learning category
• Type & amount of predictor?
• 3 Categories: Old, New & Lure.
• Same or different participants in each category?
• Same.
• Which test? One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA.
24. Which test should I choose?
24
• I want to test whether lure words are more often recognized
as old compared to learned words and new words in the
blocked design.
• Outcome variable?
• 1, continous: amount pressed old (test score)
• Predictor variable?
• 2: Categorical, Learning category + Blocked group
• Type & amount of predictor?
• Within: 3 Categories: Old, New & Lure.
• Between: 2: Blocked and unblocked
• Same or different participants in each category?
• Both
• Which test? Factorial Mixed ANOVA.
25. Break
Sources: Discovering Statistics Using
SPSS, Andy Field, 3rd edition, 2009,
SAGE Publications Ltd.
Discovering Statistics Using R,
Andy Field, 1st edition, 2012, SAGE
Publications Ltd.
29. Post Hoc tests
• When can you perform a post hoc test and why
would you want to do one?
• When your ANOVA is significant, you can perform
a post hoc test (afterwards) to see between which
groups there is a significant difference.
• This post hoc test will perform multiple
comparisons (mc) (t-tests) between all
combinations of groups (with 3 groups, these are
1-2, 2-3 & 1-3).
29
30. Fisher’s LSD
• Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) computes
multiple t-tests between groups, using the pooled
standard deviation from all groups. This increases
statistical power.
• You only perform this test when the main effect is
significant. Otherwise, you could get significant
results in the post hoc without having an overall
effect.
• Fisher's LSD does not correct for multiple
comparisons (mc)!
30
31. The dead salmon effect
• In 2009, Bennett et al. placed a dead salmon in an
fMRI scanner and reported brain activity in the
hippocampus. What happened?
• Performing 100 t-tests without correction, using
the <0.05 significance threshold, 5 tests are
expected to falsely reported as significant. This is
called a type 1 error or «Alpha-Fehler» (False
Positive).
• To avoid this, you should correct for multiple
comparisons. There are loads of post hoc tests to
correct for those multiple comparisons.
31
32. Bonferroni
• Bonferroni is the most strict correction. It will lower
the significance level by deviding with the amount of
tests performed, for example α=0.05/3=0.017.
• This makes sure there is no false positive (type 1 error
/ α-Fehler) possible, thus you can say that a significant
difference found with Bonferroni is truely there.
• However, with Bonferroni there is a chance of a false
negative (type 2 error / β-Fehler): failing to find a
significant difference between groups when in fact
there is one.
32
33. Post Hoc in a One-Way
Independent ANOVA
• Click Post Hoc and then LSD, Bonferroni & Tukey.
• Bonferroni is the most strict correction. You can say
that a significant difference found with Bonferroni is
truely there.
• Fisher’s LSD is not correcting for multiple comparisons.
• To use a test correcting for both type 1 & 2 errors, you
can use the Tukey correction.
In this course we only use the Bonferroni correction.
• This Bonferroni correction is also the post hoc test for
Mixed & Factorial ANOVA’s
33
34. Contrasts
• Compares groups, using the variance and degrees of
freedom of all your data
• Therefore, the statistical power is higher than using a t-
test
• It is also more flexible,
you can compare more than
2 groups with each other
• Disadvantage: you can only perform contrasts in a One-
Way Repeated Measures ANOVA
34
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 1 2 3
Coffee
35. Contrasts
• Polynomial (default): Tests polynomial patterns in
data with more than two means.
• Simple contrast: Compares each experimental
group with the control. Default: control is the last
group. Change by clicking «First».
• Repeated: Levels of UV have a meaningful order, for
example from low to high.
• Contrasts are not Post Hoc and you can’t do a mc
correction to them. Contrast performs an F-test
between groups to compare the variation.
35
36. Interaction effects
• Only with ≥ 2 UV’s.
• Distance between task 1 & 2 in control condition is
significantly smaller than in the treatment
condition
36
39. Performing the One-Way Repeated
Measures or Mixed ANOVA in SPSS
• In SPSS: Analyze General Linear Model Repeated
Measures. Number of levels = number of groups. Each
group should be it’s own variable. Click define. Put each
scale variable in the Within-Subjects variables (Alt – Kritisch
– Neu).
• To make this a Factorial Mixed ANOVA, add the grouping
variable (Nominal) in the Between-Subjects factor box.
• Options: display means for factor1, compare main effects,
adjustment Bonferroni, descriptive statistics, transformation
matrix
• Auf Deutsch: Analysieren Allgemeines lineares Modell
Messwiederholung. Anzahl der Stufen = Anzahl Gruppen /
Konditionen. RM: Innersubjektvariabeln (Within).
Mixed: Zwischensubjektfaktoren (Between) hinzufugen. 39
40. Interpreting SPSS Output
What is Mauchly doing in my output?
• Mauchly tests the sphericity. When Mauchly’s test is
significant, the variances of the differences between levels
are significantly unequal. Now, we need a correction to still
use the ANOVA.
• When the Greenhouse-Geisser estimate Epsilon (ε) > 0.75,
report the ANOVA values with Huyn-Feldt correction.
• Otherwise, use the ANOVA values with the Greenhouse-
Geisser correction.
• The Pairwise Comparisons table is your post hoc output.
40
44. Interpreting SPSS Output
The polynomial contrast test whether there is
a linear or a quadratisch pattern in your data.
44
45. Interpreting SPSS Output
This is the output of your posthoc test.
These are t-tests between all possible
combinations of groups, corrected for
multiple comparisons with Bonferroni
correction (b).
45
46. Standard Error of the Mean (SEM)
• Standard Error of the Mean (SEM)
«Standardfehler» displays the standard
deviation (SD) of the sample mean.
• You use this to display error bars
«Fehlerbalken» in your plots.
• It is calculated as:
• Standard deviation sample / 𝑁
• In Excel: =Stdev.s(values) /
sqrt(count(values))
• Deutsch: =STABW.S(Datenzellen) /
WURZEL(ANZAHL(Datenzellen))
46
47. How to make figures
In SPSS:
• Your data (old/new/lure) should each be a seperate
variable (column) which is set to scale «metrisch»
• The blocked / unblocked group should be one
variable saying for each values to which group it
belongs. You should set this to «Nominal
messniveau».
• Go to Grafik Diagrammerstellung Gruppierte
balken X-achse blocked group Y-achse select
3 old/new/lure variables with shift
• Fehlerbalken anzeigen, Statistik: Mittelwert,
Standardfehler Multiplikator 1.
47
48. How to make figures
In Excel: make custom error bars.
Calculate SEM as standardeviavtion.sample /
𝑁
=Stdev.s / sqrt(count(values))
48
50. Overview writing a report
• Abstract is a mini report. It has the most
important information on the introduction,
methods, results and discussion.
• You normally write this the last.
• It is the most important part, while most
persons only read the abstract.
50
51. Overview writing a report
• Introduction starts with giving an overview
on the literature, theoretical background.
What do we already know?
• State research question (RQ).
• Hypothesis, what do you expect the answer
on RQ is and why? Support with literature.
• Expectations: which direction do you think
the data results will be and why? (support
with literature).
• Very short (~3 sentences) how you are
going to test your RQ. This is a little bridge
to the methods.
51
52. Overview writing a report
• Methods has little subsections
• Subjects, amount m/f, mean age ± SD, for
the total and in between subjects also for
each group
• Procedure: Short overview of the
experiment
• Task: Detailed explanation of the learning
and recall task
• Statistics: How did you perform statistics,
what was AV/UV, which test did you use,
which significance level did you use
52
53. Overview writing a report
• Results
• All your results in graphs / tables
• Also in text! Without looking at the figures,
I should know your results.
53
54. Overview writing a report
• Discussion
• Interpret the results
• What does this mean for your RQ and
hypothesis?
• What does this mean to the literature? Use
sources!
• Conclusion
• Future Research proposal
• Last sentence should be strong summary,
make your point (take home message for
the reader)
• References: APA Style 54
55. Sources
Bennett, C. M., Miller, M. B., & Wolford, G. L. (2009). Neural
correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem
Atlantic Salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons
correction. Neuroimage, 47, S125.
Discovering Statistics Using R, Andy Field, 1st edition, 2012,
SAGE Publications Ltd.
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Andy Field, 3rd edition, 2009,
SAGE Publications Ltd.
effectsizefaq.com, retrieved on 30.10.2017