Εγκληματίες Οριενταλιστές Αποικιοκράτες κι Αμόρφωτοι Μεροληπτικοί Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει στον Αέρα τα Σάπια Θεμέλια της Νεώτερης Δύσης
ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”
Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 14η Φεβρουαρίου 2019
First published on 27th April 2007 in Buzzle, American Chronicle, and AfroArticles
Extensively republished ever since, and recently mentioned in my article:
https://www.academia.edu/43433032/Sudan_Ethiopia_Abyssinia_Egypt_Somalia_Yemen_and_the_Anti-African_Plans_of_the_Colonial_Orientalists_and_of_their_local_stooges
Isang presentasyong tumatalakay sa mga naiambag o naging impluwensiya ng rome na hanggang sa kasalukuyang panahon ay nililinang at ginagamit pa rin ng mga tao.
Contents
Introduction
I. A fictional concept: the origin of the fraud
II. A construct based on posterior textual sources
III. The deceitful presentation
IV. 5th century BCE texts found in 15th c. CE manuscripts do not make 'History'.
V. Abundant evidence of lies and deliberate distortions attested in the manuscript transmission
VI. Darius I the Great, the Behistun inscription, and Ctesias
VII. The historical Assyrian Queen Shammuramat and the fictional Queen Semiramis of the 'Ancient Greek sources'
VIII. The malignant intentions of the Benedictine liars: from the historical Darius I the Great to the fictional Semiramis
IX. The vicious distortions of the Benedictine liars: from Ctesias to Herodotus
Aramaeans, and not Arabs, are all the Arabic-speaking People of the Middle East - the Greek Orientalist Prof. M. S. Megalommatis deletes the False History of the Anglo-French Colonials
ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”
Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 7η Φεβρουαρίου 2019.
First republished on 18th September 2021 here:
https://profmegalommatistextsingreek.wordpress.com/2021/09/18/αραμαίοι-κι-όχι-άραβες-είναι-όλοι-οι-αρ/
First published on 27th April 2007 in Buzzle, American Chronicle, and AfroArticles
Extensively republished ever since, and recently mentioned in my article:
https://www.academia.edu/43433032/Sudan_Ethiopia_Abyssinia_Egypt_Somalia_Yemen_and_the_Anti-African_Plans_of_the_Colonial_Orientalists_and_of_their_local_stooges
Isang presentasyong tumatalakay sa mga naiambag o naging impluwensiya ng rome na hanggang sa kasalukuyang panahon ay nililinang at ginagamit pa rin ng mga tao.
D. Mustilli: the Greek population has always constituted a minority in Epirus
Similar to Εγκληματίες Οριενταλιστές Αποικιοκράτες κι Αμόρφωτοι Μεροληπτικοί Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει στον Αέρα τα Σάπια Θεμέλια της Νεώτερης Δύσης
Contents
Introduction
I. A fictional concept: the origin of the fraud
II. A construct based on posterior textual sources
III. The deceitful presentation
IV. 5th century BCE texts found in 15th c. CE manuscripts do not make 'History'.
V. Abundant evidence of lies and deliberate distortions attested in the manuscript transmission
VI. Darius I the Great, the Behistun inscription, and Ctesias
VII. The historical Assyrian Queen Shammuramat and the fictional Queen Semiramis of the 'Ancient Greek sources'
VIII. The malignant intentions of the Benedictine liars: from the historical Darius I the Great to the fictional Semiramis
IX. The vicious distortions of the Benedictine liars: from Ctesias to Herodotus
Aramaeans, and not Arabs, are all the Arabic-speaking People of the Middle East - the Greek Orientalist Prof. M. S. Megalommatis deletes the False History of the Anglo-French Colonials
ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”
Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 7η Φεβρουαρίου 2019.
First republished on 18th September 2021 here:
https://profmegalommatistextsingreek.wordpress.com/2021/09/18/αραμαίοι-κι-όχι-άραβες-είναι-όλοι-οι-αρ/
Arabs do not exist! The far-reaching revelation of the Orientalist Historian Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”
Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 14η Αυγούστου 2018.
First republished on 24th September 2021 here:
https://profmegalommatistextsingreek.wordpress.com/2021/09/24/άραβες-δεν-υπάρχουν-η-ανατρεπτική-απο/
亞里斯多德作為歷史偽造品,西方世界的虛假歷史和腐爛的基礎,金灿荣和他敏銳的評論
Аристотель как историческая подделка, фальшивая история и гнилые основы западного мира, и проницательные комментарии профессора Цзинь Канронга
Contents
I. Aristotle: a Major Founding Myth of the Western World
II. When, where and by whom was the Myth of Aristotle fabricated?
III. The Myth of Aristotle and its first Byproducts: Scholasticism, East-West Schism, the Crusades & the Sack of Constantinople (1204)
IV. Aristotelization: First Stage of the Westernization and the Colonization of the World
V. Aristotelization as Foundation of all the Western Forgeries: the so-called Judeo-Christian Heritage and the Fraud of Greco-Roman Civilization
VI. The Modern Western World as Disruption of History
VII. The Myth of Aristotle and the Monstrosity of Western Colonialism
The Western World hates Egypt terribly; that's why all the administrations of the country -pseudo-royal (khedivial), presidential (military) or Islamist (republican)- were always appointed after French, English and/or American decision or active involvement and with Western support only to function as local ignorant servants definitely unable to fathom the deeply self-destructive nature of the acts that their foreign masters force them to implement, and absolutely unsuspicious of the venomous hatred that their beastly superiors harbor against the Holy Land that is the Valley of the Nile down to Khartoum.
Contents
I. Western Hatred against Egypt and Plans against Mankind
II. The End of Egypt may be very close
III. Egypt and the Pulverization of Sudan and Libya
IV. The Renaissance Dam in the light of the Abyssinian 'Prophecy' against Egypt and Sudan
Article first published in Buzzle, American Chronicle, and AfroArticles on 21 October 2007
An introduction into the pre-history of a Western European legend, which only later was extrapolated and associated with Eastern Africa; the legendary 'kingdom of Prester John' has nothing to do with Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians.
Greece historically in Katharevousa and Ancient Greek, Hellas, officially the Hellenic Republic is a country in Southern Europe, politically considered part of Western Europe.
Initially published on 18th October 2006 in Buzzle
Excerpt:
Focus must be made on the long fight between civilization and barbarism within Islam (a phenomenon that occurred in all milieus and environments throughout History):
1. the conflict between the Aramaeans (the indigenous nation of Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, Southeastern Anatolia, Southwestern Iran and Persian Gulf coasts) and the nomadic, uncivilized and only superficially Islamized Arabs of Hejaz and the desert. The Aramaeans, by accepting Islam, transferred within the context of the early caliphates their civilization, knowledge and wisdom, sciences, Letters and Arts, as they were the real heirs of the Mesopotamian – Babylonian cultural and scientific achievements. It is known that Bayt al Hikmah (House of Wisdom) in Abbasid Baghdad was mainly formed out of the library, the scholars and the scientists of Sassanid Academy of Jond-e Shapur (also spelled as Gondishapur), but few are aware that the outright majority in both institutions were Aramaeans.
2. the fact that Islam's diffusion among the Arabs was rather tantamount to cultural, intellectual and religious Aramaization of the Arabs; and this is exactly the reason for which the barbarian elements of Mecca (Abu Sufyan, Abu Bakr, Omar ibn al Khattab) reacted against Islam in diverse manners.
3. the conflicts between Muslim Copts, Muslim Iranians, and Muslim Berbers with Arabs as attested in national, spiritual and intellectual polarizations of the Islamic times (examples: the Shu'ubiyah movement and their historical interpretations; the role of the Brethren of Purity in transferring within the context of Early Islam a plethora of Gnostic spiritual, moral, religious and intellectual topics; the part played by the Iranian Barmakid family in transforming the Abbasid Caliphate into an Iranian Renaissance; etc)
Iran: an Orientalist Fabrication of the Colonial Powers - the Orientalist Historian Prof. M. S. Megalommatis explains why in reality Iran 'is' Azerbaijan
ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”
Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 23η Σεπτεμβρίου 2018.
First republished on 21st September 2021 here:
https://profmegalommatistextsingreek.wordpress.com/2021/09/21/ιράν-οριενταλιστικό-παρασκεύασμα-τω/
Similar to Εγκληματίες Οριενταλιστές Αποικιοκράτες κι Αμόρφωτοι Μεροληπτικοί Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει στον Αέρα τα Σάπια Θεμέλια της Νεώτερης Δύσης (20)
Мировая политика как черное и белое: Иран и Израиль, или как люди становятся жертвами намеренно проецируемых на них заблуждений
Содержание
Введение
I. Каждый сектантский подход и каждая сектантская мысль являются порочной ошибкой и нетерпимым поступком
II. Политическая ситуация и международные отношения не определяют природу режимов, правительств и государств
III. Когда дело касается мировых дел, не существует шахматной доски с «черными» и «белыми» клетками
IV. Все СМИ сообщают одну и ту же ложь, меняя только «шахматные наборы»
V. Достоинство иранцев и палестинцев является наиболее спорным вопросом
VI. Вера в обещания, данные врагами, замаскированными под друзей, может оказаться смертельной
VII. Военные и фермеры против королевской семьи и аятолл
VIII. Нет никакой разницы между Ираном и Египтом, когда дело доходит до раболепия по отношению к крупным колониальным схемам
Contents
Introduction
I. Every sectarian approach and every sectarian thought are a vicious mistake and an intolerable act.
II. Political situations and international relations do not define the nature of regimes, governments, and states.
III. When it comes to world affairs, there is no such thing as a chessboard with "black" and "white" squares.
IV. All mass media report the same lies, changing only the «chess sets».
V. The dignity of the Iranians and the Palestinians is a most controversial subject.
VI. Believing promises given by enemies disguised as friends may be lethal.
VII. Military and farmers against the royals and the ayatollahs
VIII. There is no difference between Iran and Egypt when it comes to servility toward major colonial schemes.
За пределами афроцентризма: предпосылки для того, чтобы Сомали возглавила африканскую деколонизацию и девестернизацию
Содержание
Введение
I. Деколонизация и отказ афроцентрической интеллигенции
II. Афроцентристским африканским ученым следовало бы отобрать египтологию у западных востоковедов и африканистов.
III. Западная узурпация африканского наследия должна быть отменена.
IV. Афроцентризм должен был включать в себя резкую критику и полное неприятие так называемой западной цивилизации.
V. Афроцентризм как форма африканского изоляционизма, проводящая линию разделения между колонизированными странами Африки и Азии.
VI. Общая оценка человеческих ресурсов, времени и необходимых затрат
VII. Деколонизация означает, прежде всего, деанглификацию и дефранкизацию.
Contents
Introduction
I. Decolonization and the failure of the Afrocentric Intelligentsia
II. Afrocentric African scholars should have been taken Egyptology back from the Western Orientalists and Africanists
III. Western Usurpation of African Heritage must be canceled.
IV. Afrocentrism had to encompass severe criticism and total rejection of the so-called Western Civilization
V. Afrocentrism as a form of African Isolationism drawing a line of separation between colonized nations in Africa and Asia
VI. General estimation of the human resources, the time, and the cost needed
VII. Decolonization means above all De-Anglicization and De-Francization
What was Ordinary in the Antiquity looks Odd today, due to the Greco-centric Fallacy of the Biased European Colonial 'Academics'
Contents
Introduction
I. Fayoum, Al Bahnasa (Oxyrhynchus), and Ancient Egyptian Papyri
II. Karl Wessely and his groundbreaking research and publications
III. Papyrus fragment 1224 of Karl Wessely's SPP VIII
IV. Βουλγαρικ- (Vulgarik-)
V. Eastern Roman Emperor Maurice's Strategicon and the Bulgarian cloaks
VI. Historical context and the Ancient History of Bulgars
VII. Historical context, the Silk Roads, and Bulgarian exports to Egypt
VIII. Academic context and the Western falsehood of a Euro-centric World History
i- the conceptualization of World History
ii- the contextualization of every single document newly found here and there
iii- the stages of historical falsification that were undertaken over the past 500 years
iv- the forgers themselves and their antiquity
v- and last but not least, several points of
a) governance of modern states
b) international alliances, and
c) the ensuing captivity of all the targeted nations, each one well-adjusted into the preconceived role that the forgers invented for it
Introduction
I. Chinese as the First Foreign Language in Egypt
II. Systematic Dissociation and Separation from Western Europe and North America
III. The Egypt - Sudan - Libya Confederation
IV. How the Chinese-Egyptian Alliance will reshape Africa into Five Mega-States
Contents
Introduction
I. Toshka or New Valley Project
II. Water Desalination Plants
III. Relocation of a Sizeable Part of Egypt's Population
IV. The Rafah-Taba Canal
V. Twenty (20) Chinese Universities to operate in Egypt
--------
First published on 18th January 2024 here:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/01/18/a-special-military-alliance-with-china-is-egypts-only-chance-for-survival-iv/
Contents
I. Grave Threats for Egypt's Existence and Serious Danger for China's Expansion
II. Perspectives of the Strategic Alliance between Egypt & China
III. Two Chinese Military Bases in Egypt: One Million Chinese Military on African Soil
IV. Joint Chinese-Egyptian Military Operations in Sudan and the Perspectives of a Chinese-Egyptian-Sudanese Alliance
V. Joint Chinese-Egyptian Military Operations in Libya and the Perspectives of a Chinese-Egyptian-Libyan Alliance
----------
First published on 16th January 2024 here:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/01/16/a-special-military-alliance-with-china-is-egypts-only-chance-for-survival-iii/
The rise of China as a world superpower has hitherto been a long path marked with several successes and advances, but also significant drawbacks and failures. The Arab Spring can be seen from many viewpoints and interpreted as per its impact on diverse states, but it was indisputably a severe impediment to China's attempt to penetrate in Africa and offer the numerous African nations a trustworthy perspective and a valuable support in terms of nation building and sustainable development. It goes without saying that, if the Chinese establishment truly intends to bring forth a groundbreaking change at the worldwide level, Beijing must carefully take the lesson of those circumstances before 13 years and overwhelmingly modify China's understanding of perplex situations and approach to long standing problems, notably the European colonialism in Africa and elsewhere.
In the first part of this series of articles, I expanded on a) the centuries-old Western hatred of Egypt, b) the existing historical threats against the Valley of the Nile, c) the gradual process of decomposition that the criminal Western gangsters applied to Libya and the Sudan over the past 12 years, and d) the direct relationship between the otherwise worthless Renaissance Dam (also known as GERD), which has been built in the Occupied Benishangul land (currently province) of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), and the Abyssinian 'Prophecy' against Egypt and Sudan. This is the link:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/01/01/a-special-military-alliance-with-china-is-egypts-only-chance-for-survival/
In the present article, I will complete the presentation of the Egyptian approach to the need of the Egyptian-Chinese Military Alliance and I will expand on the Chinese perspective towards the topic.
Contents
I. The War in Gaza and the Destabilization of the Red Sea Region
II. The Rise of China as a World Super-power
III. The Irrevocable Prerequisites of China's Worldwide Predominance
Περιεχόμενα
Α. Πνευματικότητα, Θρησκείες, Θεολογίες και Ιδεολογίες
Β. Αποδοχή μιας άλλης θρησκείας και δράση προσηλύτων
Γ. Εγκλήματα προσηλυτιστών
Δ. Αλλαγή θρησκείας, προσηλυτισμός και πολυπολιτισμικότητα
Ε. Δεν υπάρχει το Ισλάμ ως θρησκεία χωρίς τις ιστορικές ισλαμικές επιστήμες
Επίλογος
Προτάσεις για την Υπέρβαση της Θράκης, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη: Εξόρμηση, 5 Μαρτίου 1990; Πολιτικά Θέματα, 2-8 Μαρτίου 1990; Οικονομικός Ταχυδρόμος, Ιούλιος 1990
Proposals to transcend the problem in Thrace, by Cosmas Megalommatis: Exormisi (Sortie), 5 March 1990; Politika Themata (Political Matters), 2-8 March 1990; Oikonomikos Tahydromos (Economic Courier), July 1990
Предложения по преодолению проблемы во Фракии, автор Космас Мегаломматис: Exormisi (Вылазка), 5 марта 1990 г.; Политика Фемата (Политические вопросы), 2–8 марта 1990 года; Ойкономикос Тагидромос (Экономический курьер), июль 1990 г.
Σουννίτες και Σιίτες: στη ρίζα της διαφοράς, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη – Εποπτεία 119, Ιανουάριος 1987, σελ. 29-37
Sunnis and Shiites: at the root of the dispute, by Cosmas Megalommatis: Epopteia (‘Overview’) 119, January 1987, p. 29-37
Сунниты и шииты: в основе спора, (автор:) Кузьма Мегаломматис: Эпоптея («Обзор») 119, январь 1987 г., с. 29-37
Η διεθνής αντιμετώπιση της ισλαμικής Περσίας, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη: Εποπτεία 119, Ιανουάριος 1987, σελ. 38-48
How the international community treated the Islamic Republic of Iran, by Cosmas Megalommatis: Epopteia (‘Overview’) 119, January 1987, p. 38-48
Как международное сообщество относилось к Исламской Республике Иран, (автор:) Кузьма Мегаломматис: Эпоптея («Обзор») 119, январь 1987 г., стр. 38-48
Η Πολιτική Ζωή στην Ισλαμική Περσία, του Κοσμά Μεγαλομμάτη: Εποπτεία 119, Ιανουάριος 1987, σελ. 19-28
Political Life in Islamic Iran, by Cosmas Megalommatis: Epopteia (‘Overview’) 119, January 1987, p. 19-28
Политическая жизнь в исламском Иране, (автор:) Кузьма Мегаломматис: Эпоптея («Обзор») 119, январь 1987 г., с. 19-28
——————————–
Συνήθεις αναγνώστες μου θα παραξενευθούν επειδή χρησιμοποιώ τον όρο ‘Περσία’ αντί ‘Ιράν’ στο συγκεκριμένο άρθρο, καθώς και σε πολλά άλλα άρθρα, εγκυκλοπαιδικά λήμματα, επιστημονικ΄ά άρθρα, και βιβλία δημοσιευμένα στην δεκαετία του 1980 και στις αρχές του 1990. Αυτό οφείλεται στο γεγονός ότι ο όρος αυτός είναι περισσότερο γνωστός και αγαπητός στο ελληνόφωνο αναγνωστικό κοινό, ενώ ο όρος ‘Ιράν’ ακούγεται μάλλον ξενικός. Τότε έγραφα για να πληροφορήσω και να κατατοπίσω σχετικά με θέματα ιστορικού, πνευματικού, θρησκευτικού και πολιτιστικού ενδιαφέροντος σχετιζόμενα με το Ιράν, καθώς και για υποθέσεις επιμελώς αποκρυμμένες σε όλο τον δυτικό κόσμο, όπως επίσης και για δημιουργήσω συμπάθεια προς το Ιράν εναντίον του οποίου στρέφονταν η Δυτική Ευρώπη, το σοβιετικό μπλοκ, οι ΗΠΑ, άλλες δυτικές χώρες, και τα τρισάθλια σκουπίδια των εθελόδουλων κυβερνητών του ανύπαρκτου και ανυπόστατου “αραβικού” κόσμου. Βεβαίως και τότε γνώριζα πολύ καλά ότι ο εξεπίτηδες προτιμώμενος από την μεροληπτική, αποικιοκρατική, δυτική βιβλιογραφία όρος ‘Περσία’ είναι ολότελα λαθεμένος, επειδή το Φαρς (Περσία) αποτελεί μόνον ένα μικρό τμήμα του ιστορικού Ιράν.
Several of my readers may be astounded because I use the term ‘Persia’ instead of ‘Iran’ in this article, as well as in many other articles, entries to encyclopedias, scholarly articles and books published in the 1980s and the early 1990s. This is due to the fact that this term is better known and preferred by the Greek-speaking readership, while the term ‘Iran’ sounds rather foreign to them. At the time, I was writing in order to inform and enlighten about historical, spiritual, religious and cultural topics pertaining to Iran, as well as about matters carefully hidden throughout the Western world, and in order to generate sympathy for Iran against which Western Europe, the Soviet bloc, the USA, other Western countries, and the wretched, docile and useless rulers of the non-existent “Arab” world had formed an alliance. Of course, even then, I was fully aware of the fact that the term ‘Persia’, which is intentionally supported by the biased colonial Western scholarship, is wrong; this is so because Fars (Persia) is only a small part of historical Iran.
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ουροβόρος: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989
Кузьма Мегаломматис, Уроборос (свернувшийся в кольцо змей или дракон, кусающий себя за хвост): мировая мифология, Греческая педагогическая энциклопедия, 1989
Kosmas Megalommatis, Ouroboros oder Uroboros (‘Selbstverzehrer’ oder ‘Schwanzverzehrender’ / eine zusammengerollte Schlange oder ein Drache, der sich in den Schwanz beißt): Weltmythologie, Griechische Pädagogische Enzyklopädie, 1989
Kosmas Gözübüyükoğlu, Ouroboros (kendi kuyruğunu ısıran bir yılan): Dünya Mitolojisi, Yunan Pedagoji Ansiklopedisi, 1989
قزمان ميغالوماتيس، اوروبروس (دُنبخوار/مار یا اژدهایی است که دماش را میخورد): اساطیر جهانی، دایره المعارف آموزشی یونانی، 1989
Côme Megalommatis, Ouroboros (un serpent ou un dragon qui se mord la queue): Mythologie mondiale, Encyclopédie pédagogique grecque, 1989
1989 قزمان ميغالوماتيس، الأوربوروس (الثعبان أو التنين وهو يأكل ذيله.) : الأساطير العالمية، الموسوعة التربوية اليونانية،
Cosimo Megalommatis, Urobòro (chiamato anche uroburo o uroboros o ancora ouroboros / un serpente o un drago che si morde la coda, formando un cerchio senza inizio né fine): mitologia mondiale, Enciclopedia pedagogica greca, 1989
Cosimo Megalommatis, Uróboros (uróboro o ouroboro o uroboro / serpiente que se come la cola): mitología mundial, Enciclopedia pedagógica griega, 1989
Cosmas Megalommatis, Ouroboros (or Uroboros / a serpent or dragon eating its own tail): World Mythology, Greek Pedagogical Encyclopedia, 1989
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Εγκληματίες Οριενταλιστές Αποικιοκράτες κι Αμόρφωτοι Μεροληπτικοί Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει στον Αέρα τα Σάπια Θεμέλια της Νεώτερης Δύσης
2. Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής –
Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή
Αυτοκρατορία
Εγκληματίες
Οριενταλιστές
Αποικιοκράτες κι
Αμόρφωτοι
Μεροληπτικοί
Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ.
Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει
στον Αέρα τα Σάπια
3. Θεμέλια της
Νεώτερης Δύσης
Οι αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές, φιλόλογοι,
καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες, φιλόσοφοι κι
ιστορικοί ήταν εντελώς αμόρφωτοι σχετικά
με την ιστορία, τις γλώσσες και τους
πολιτισμούς σχεδόν όλων των αρχαίων
ανατολικών εθνών κι αυτοκρατοριών, όλων
των χριστιανικών εθνών, και των
μουσουλμανικών λαών της εποχής
τους. Και μέσα στη θλιβερή αυτή
αμορφωσιά τους νόμισαν ότι με λίγα
λατινικά κι αρχαία ελληνικά θα μπορούσαν
να ανασυνθέσουν την Ιστορία της
Ανθρωπότητας.
Χωρίς να γνωρίζουν αρχαίες (νεκρές)
γλώσσες και γραφές των μεγάλων αρχαίων
ανατολικών πολιτισμών και χωρίς να
ενδιαφέρονται να μάθουν σύγχρονές τους
4. γλώσσες και γραφές των χριστιανικών,
μουσουλμανικών κι άλλων εθνών, οι
αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές,
φιλόλογοι, καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες,
φιλόσοφοι κι ιστορικοί είχαν όλη την
απροσμέτρητη αλαζονεία ενός αμόρφωτου
ξερόλα, την άρρωστη νοοτροπία
ενός θρασύδειλου απατεώνα, και την
διανοητική ανωμαλία ενός ημιμαθούς
καυχησιάρη.
Διαβάζοντας λατινικά κι αρχαία ελληνικά
νόμιζαν οι γελοίοι αναγεννησιακοί ότι
μαθαίνουν επίσης και για άλλους λαούς και
πολιτισμούς, επειδή αρχαίοι Έλληνες και
Ρωμαίοι είχαν προσπαθήσει να πάρουν τα
φώτα των μεγάλων αρχαίων ανατολικών
πολιτισμών και να μορφωθούν από
εκείνους, αφήνοντας έτσι πολλές αναφορές
για την Αίγυπτο, την Μεσοποταμία, την
Φοινίκη, την Ανατολία, την Περσία κι
άλλες περιοχές όπου είχαν αναπτυχθεί
μεγαλύτεροι κι αρχαιότεροι πολιτισμοί.
5. Όμως οι αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές,
φιλόλογοι, καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες,
φιλόσοφοι κι ιστορικοί ούτε προς στιγμήν
διανοήθηκαν ότι τα αρχαία ελληνικά και
λατινικά κείμενα δεν αποτελούν τεκμήρια
αλήθειας παρά μόνον για την αρχαία Ελλάδα
και την Ρώμη, κι ότι δεν έχουν παρά μικρή
μόνον αξία ως δευτερεύουσες και
μεταγενέστερες πηγές για την Βαβυλώνα,
την Ασσυρία, την Αίγυπτο και το Ιράν.
Ανάξια λόγου συχνά, αληθινά αρκετές φορές,
λαθεμένα ως επί το πλείστον, τα αρχαία
ελληνικά και λατινικά κείμενα για τους
αρχαίους ανατολικούς πολιτισμούς δεν
ανασυστήνουν την Αρχαία Ιστορία της
Ανατολής και της Αρχής του Ανθρωπίνου
Γένους αλλά περιγράφουν μόνον τι από τους
αρχαίους πολιτισμούς κατάλαβαν οι Αρχαίοι
Έλληνες και Ρωμαίοι.
Οπότε, οι αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές,
φιλόλογοι, καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες,
φιλόσοφοι κι ιστορικοί, παρασυρόμενοι από
την προχειρότητά τους και την μεγαλαυχία
6. τους, διαμόρφωσαν γνώμη σχετικά με τους
αρχαίους ανατολικούς πολιτισμούς, όταν δεν
είχαν τα κατάλληλα στοιχεία, τις
πρωτογενείς πηγές αποκρυπτογραφημένες,
για να διαμορφώσουν γνώμη.
Έτσι, προϊδεασμένες απόψεις και λάθος
γνώμες για το αντικείμενό τους
επικρατούσαν μέσα στα μυαλά των πρώτων
οριενταλιστών που προσπάθησαν να
ανεύρουν, να αποκρυπτογραφήσουν, και να
μελετήσουν τα υπολείμματα των αρχαίων
ανατολικών πολιτισμών 300 ολόκληρα
χρόνια μετά τους αναγεννησιακούς.
Πολλά προβλήματα που καθορίζουν
αρνητικά τις σημερινές παγκόσμιες
εξελίξεις έχουν την αρχή τους στα
αφετηριακά λάθη των οριενταλιστών του
18ου, του 19ου και του 20ου αιώνα. Και σ’
αυτά προστίθενται κι οι πολιτικές
σκοπιμότητες των αποικιοκρατικών
χωρών, κυρίως της Γαλλίας και της
Αγγλίας, στις οποίες οι πρώτοι
οριενταλιστές ως επί το πλείστον ανήκαν.
7. Αυτοί δεν είδαν στην Ανατολή παρά το τι
ήθελαν να δουν κι όχι την αληθινή
πραγματικότητα. Και δεν ανέπτυξαν τις
ανθρωπιστικές και τις ανατολιστικές
επιστήμες για να αναζητήσουν, ανεύρουν
και καταστήσουν γνωστή την αλήθεια αλλά
για να προωθήσουν τα αποικιοκρατικά
συμφέροντά τους, να επιβάλουν τις
διαστροφικές ιδέες τους και την άνομη κι
αντίχριστη εξουσία τους, και να βουλιάξουν
όλο τον υπόλοιπο κόσμο στην αμορφωσιά,
στον βαρβαρισμό, στην άγνοια, σε απώλεια
ιστορικής ταυτότητας, σε απεμπόληση
πολιτισμικής συνείδησης και σε μια
απερίγραπτη πολιτισμική διαστροφή.
Αλλού δημιούργησαν ανύπαρκτα έθνη,
αλλού έστησαν εξυπαρχής αποτυχημένα
κράτη, αλλού απέκρυψαν και προσπάθησαν
να καταστρέψουν πανάρχαια έθνη που
επιβίωσαν μέχρι τις μέρες μας, και σε
πολλές περιπτώσεις επέβαλαν ψευδέστατη
ταυτότητα και όνομα σε έθνη που τα
χρειάζονταν μόνον ως άβουλα πιόνια,
8. ταπεινά σκλαβάκια, κι απλά εργαλεία της
απάνθρωπης διεθνούς πολιτικής τους.
Αυτά και πολύ περισσότερα καταλογίζει ο
διακεκριμένος Έλληνας ανατολιστής
ιστορικός και πολιτικός επιστήμονας καθ.
Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης στους
Γάλλους, Άγγλους κι Αμερικανούς
ανατολιστές κι αποικιοκράτες και στους
αναγεννησιακούς προκατόχους τους.
Κάνει μάλιστα λόγο και για απαγορευμένες
επιστήμες, όπως η Αραμαιολογία – ένας
κλάδος ανατολιστικών επιστημών που δεν
υπήρξε ποτέ επειδή οι αποικιοκρατικές
δυνάμεις της Δύσης απλά δεν επιθυμούσαν
να δημιουργηθεί στην Μέση Ανατολή ένα
ανεξάρτητο χριστιανικό αραμαϊκό κράτος.
Έτσι τα τμήματα / περιεχόμενα αυτού του
κλάδου μοιράστηκαν σε άλλες ειδικότητες
έτσι ώστε να μην υπάρξει Αραμαιολογία
όπως υπάρχουν Ιρανολογία, Τουρκολογία,
Αιγυπτιολογία, Κοπτολογία, κοκ.
Αναδημοσιεύω ολόκληρο το άρθρο του
Έλληνα ανατολιστή που δίνει μόνον ένα
9. γενικό πλαίσιο των πολιτιστικών
εγκλημάτων που έγιναν από τους Γάλλους,
Άγγλους κι Αμερικανούς αποικιοκράτες
ανατολιστές στο όνομα της επιστήμης. Η
φωτογραφία κι ο υπότιτλος είναι από το
άρθρο του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη.
Oblivious Colonial
Orientalists and
Aramaeology, a
Prohibited Science
https://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Ara
maeology_And_Colonialims_8_6_2007.htm
10. The modern disciplines of Humanities
emanated out of Renaissance intellectuals’
interest for the Antiquity, and the reason
they mainly evolved around Classical
Antiquity is the fact that Latin and
Ancient Greek were the traditionally
known and preserved, among scholars,
languages of the Antiquity.
The Orient, as the Epitome of the Other,
had to be murderous, as if the West was
not; that is why Alexandre Cabanel
deployed great effort to depict Cleopatra
testing poisons on her prisoners, as if the
11. murderous Frankish kings carried out less
appalling crimes…
The modern disciplines of Humanities, as
developed by European universities first,
and through successive stages since the
17th century (and more notably during
the last two centuries), were a model that
expanded in universities throughout all
continents. They emanated out of
Renaissance intellectuals’ interest for the
Antiquity, and the reason they mainly
evolved around Classical Antiquity is the
fact that Latin and Ancient Greek were
the traditionally known and preserved,
among scholars, languages of the
Antiquity.
European Renaissance: indifferent for
Ancient Hebrew, Coptic, Aramaic Syriac,
Armenian, Georgian, Old Slavic, and
Arabic
12. Other languages were also known and
continually studied in Medieval and
Renaissance Europe, such as Ancient
Hebrew, Coptic, Aramaic Syriac,
Armenian, Georgian, Old Slavic, and
Arabic. But all these ‘marginal’ – for the
Europeans – languages were the
communication means of cultures and
civilizations that were not at the
epicenter of the Renaissance Search for
Antiquity.
Ancient Hebrew pertained to the Biblical
Antiquity, being related to a mostly
religious state, that of Israel, and its
successor Judah. It was later used for
writing down the Talmud and the other
original sources of Judaism, a religion
that was constantly and severely
persecuted either in Western Europe or in
the Eastern Roman Empire. Only the
successive Islamic Caliphates tolerated
Judaism, and Jews were influential in
Baghdad, Cordoba, Kairwan, Cairo,
13. Samarqand and Istanbul. Of course, this
has to be interpreted as a genuine Persian
influence on the Islamic Caliphatic
politics and political ideology and
practice; it goes back to the favourable
position the Jews enjoyed within the
Achaemenidian Iranian, (550 – 330
BCE), Arsacid Parthian (250 BCE – 224
CE) and Sassanid Persian (224 – 651
BCE) courts.
Coptic, Aramaic Syriac, Armenian,
Georgian and Old Slavic were relevant to
various Christian states and cultures,
either Orthodox, Monophysitic (we
employ the term conventionally here, as
we do not accept its veracity) or Nestorian
(another pejorative term introduced by
Constantinople and Rome four centuries
before their Schism about the followers of
Nestorius, leading Christian philosopher,
theologian and ideologist, who like Arius
provided a far more accurate approach to
Jesus than official Christianity down to
14. our days). All these states and cultures
were religious of nature, and in addition
they were viewed inimically by the
Catholic political power of Medieval
Europe.
Arabic was the language of the Coran and
Prophet Muhammad, whom Dante had
denigrated in an unprecedented way; it
was the official language of Catholic
Europe’s worst enemy, especially from the
times of the Crusades onwards. Holy
language for the followers of a religion
repeatedly depicted by Christian authors
as the quintessence of the Antichrist,
Arabic could hardly be a matter of study,
when wars were engaged in Iberia,
Western Mediterranean and Central
Europe.
Above all, Latin and Ancient Greek were
viewed by the Renaissance and Classicism
intellectuals as key to understanding
historical sources with reference to states,
cultures and civilizations whereby
15. religion did not shape the society
exclusively, and religious authorities
were separate from the executive – or this
was what these Renaissance and
Classicism intellectuals had preconceived
in their minds due to lack of adequate
and abundant information…..
Were there other civilizations and
cultures whereby the religious authority
did not impose its norms and principles
on the judiciary, the legislative and the
executive? Possibly, but the Renaissance
and Classicism intellectuals had not
access to original sources about Ancient
Carthage, Anatolia (in today’s Turkey),
Egypt, Phoenicia, Syria, Yemen, Ethiopia
(in today’s Sudan), Mesopotamia, Persia,
and India. All they could know about
these cultures and civilizations was due
to posterior and obviously distorting
sources: Hebrew, Greek and Latin.
16. This is the reason, until the end of the
18th century, Humanities meant mostly
Classical Studies, and Biblical Studies.
The rise of the Orientalist Disciplines
With the colonial expansion of Spain and
Portugal to the Indies, the subsequent
Anglo-French rivalry for India, and the
French expedition to Egypt, a small
number of researchers, explorers,
academicians, agents and adventurers
started being versed into various old texts,
undeciphered inscriptions and
manuscripts, antiquities and antiques
gathered from any corner of the areas
they were traveling through! The
military, political, economic competition
was transferred to the academic level, and
within a century from the moment
Anquetil Duperron disembarked at
Pondicherry, several ancient writings
were already deciphered. The 19th
century attested the rise of the Orientalist
17. disciplines, namely Egyptology,
Assyriology, Iranology, Indology, Sinology,
Islamology. This was not an easy process –
in any sense.
The Orientalist project went wrong from
the very beginning because of
preconceived ideas, concepts and schemes
that should have been eliminated first,
before the fresh discoveries determine the
historical truth in the most objective,
neutral and unbiased way it could be
possibly obtained. Because this was not
done, many discoveries have been kept for
more than 100 years under silence. The
average public in Europe and America,
and throughout the world, has not yet got
access to original sources discovered before
numerous decades, and their contents
have not been incorporated in Education
manuals as they should, if Truth and
True History of the Mankind are still
sought after. The world keeps living based
on erroneous descriptions, false (as
18. incomplete and mono-dimensional)
historical data, and even more disastrous
interpretations and fact perceptions. This
automatically guarantees ignorance,
wrong choices, and error repetition.
Even worse, there were numerous and
multifaceted political motivations and
shadowy ideological machinations
behind the Orientalist experiment; one of
them was the use of the discoveries in
order to shape the History model, and to
depict the course of the World History in
a way that would best suit the colonial
academia’s preconceived ideas and
undeniably biased concepts.
Another vast issue has been the political
use of the Orientalist discoveries in a way
to possibly corroborate the peremptory
division between West and East (which is
an artificial, Manichaean concept and a
ridiculous factoid) and, even more
strikingly, the fallacy of West’s
(Occident’s) superiority over the East
19. (Orient). ‘West’ meant mainly France and
England, whereas East was exclusively
the Ottoman Empire and Iran, as Mughal
India had already collapsed. It was a
sheer anti-Islamic action of deeply
preconceived and pre-arranged
machinations. It was only normal for it to
have political repercussions, cultural –
educational consequences, and economic
ramifications that sooner or later would
engulf the entire Mankind into a most
definite disaster.
A most inhuman machination and
practice consisted in the political decision
of the colonial powers to preserve the
unearthed and deciphered knowledge as a
hidden secret, far from the hands of the
political authorities of the areas where
the material record was collected. They
stored an incredible amount of
antiquities in the Paris and London
museums, therefore pulling a great
number of Europeans and Northern
20. Americans to compete and do the same,
although the real profit would go to the
Anglo-French colonial scheme. Even
worse, they deliberately caused vibrant
reactions among the most obscurantist and
extremist elements of those societies –
throughout the Ottoman Empire and Iran
– in order to further engulf the
populations and the elites of these
countries in deep and permanent
ignorance, perverse and unjustified
hatred, and definite weakness ensuing
precisely from the lack of knowledge, i.e.
the monuments and the associated data
that the Western explorers were first
unearthing and deciphering, and second
exploiting, altering and falsifying.
Thus, although Ancient Greek was
imposed as obligatory course in the
Secondary Education of the 1828 tiny
Greek state that was helped to separate
from the Ottoman Empire (according to
the Anglo-French plans for that state’s
21. further role), not a single Egyptian had
studied Egyptian Hieroglyphics 80 years
after Champollion deciphered that
writing, and never until today (2007) a
course of Egyptian Hieroglyphic was
introduced in the Egyptian Secondary
Education, contrarily to what has been
the common practice in Greece where
schoolchildren study, during the
Secondary Education, hundreds of pages
of Ancient Greek Literature.
The Orientalism of the criminal Anglo-
French colonials was the key tool used to
ensure the imposition of all sorts of false
dogmas and doctrines of History that have
been dictatorially imposed and widely
taught throughout all the former
Ottoman, Persian and Indian provinces
that became first colonized territories,
only to later turn to post-colonial
uneducated realms of Barbary, with the
only exception of Turkey, more recently
followed by India and Malaysia.
22. This reality, the mere fact that all the
educational systems from Greece to Sudan
and from Morocco to Indonesia have
practically been of Anglo-French
machination and inspiration, makes of
all these realms permanently colonized,
bogus-states prone to manipulation, and
genuinely unable to conceive – let alone
defend – their real national identity and
interests. However, it is not our intention
to discuss in this article the political
repercussions and ramifications of
Western Orientalism.
Structural problems of the Orientalist
disciplines
At the end, we should add that there were
also structural difficulties in the
formation of the Orientalist disciplines. In
many cases, scholars embarked into the
effort of deciphering a writing the
identity of which they did not know. In
some cases, inscriptions were found in a
23. language the very existence of which was
unknown to the best scholars of the
period. Like this, specialists penetrated
from one sector to another, unveiling the
mysteries of great civilizations and
cultures far more elaborate, sophisticated
and advanced than the Ancient Greeks
and Romans 2500 years before
Epameinondas and Caesar. Then, the new
discipline (for instance Sumerology) could
not be included within the earlier
shaped discipline (Assyriology), as the two
civilizations, cultures and languages
(Sumerian and Assyrian – Babylonian)
were more different one from another
than the Ancient Greek civilization from
the Roman civilization!
To give another – comparative – example,
the decipherment of the Egyptian
Hieroglyphics led to the formation of
Egyptology, as the Orientalist discipline of
Humanities that focuses on all things
Egyptian before the Christianization of
24. Egypt and until the twilight of the
Ancient Egyptian Civilization. But due to
the decipherment of the Old Persian
Cuneiform (the scripture in use at the
Achaemenidian times of Cyrus, Cambyses,
Darius, Xerxes and their successors) we
were not helped only to form the basics of
Iranology but we were also empowered to
go ahead for the decipherment of Ancient
Babylonian and Assyrian Cuneiform, and
consequently establish Assyriology.
Although slightly similar in the writing
system, Ancient Iranian – as Indo-
European language – was far closer to
Greek than to Assyrian. Assyriology
turned out to be the mainstream
discipline of the Orientalist sector that
focalizes on Ancient – mainly but not
exclusively Semitic – Mesopotamia. As a
tit for tat, the decipherment of the
Assyrian Babylonian Cuneiform opened
the way for the discovery of the worlds of
the Ancient Hurrians, the Ancient Hittites
25. and Hatti of Anatolia, the Ancient Elam,
and above all the spectacular discovery of
Sumer, the world’s most ancient
civilization. Sumer was actually the first
organized Human Society, but its name
was completely unknown to either
Hebrew, Greek or Latin sources. This
development broke Assyriology to
numerous sections that were first kind of
‘branches’ but have been so far developed
into absolutely independent Orientalist
disciplines, Elamology, Hittitology and
Sumerology.
Then, the issue of Area Studies and the
historical representation of modern
nations’ past and identity came to surface.
It was understood that the best way for
anyone to study German civilization,
culture, language and literature was to
include Latin since the Ancient History of
Germany is mostly known due to Latin
sources. No matter what you opt for in a
French university, Lettres Classiques or
26. Lettres Modernes, you take some courses of
Latin and Vieux Français.
When it comes to Classical Studies,
universities – beyond the mainstream
syllabus – offer Aeolian, Doric and
Ionian dialects, Linear II (deciphered and
identified as the earlier form of Achaean
Greek), Alexandrian Greek Koine,
Papyrology, and Medieval Greek.
And when a student wants to pursue Area
Studies with focus on Greece in an
American university, the syllabus does
not only encompass Ancient, Medieval
and Modern Greek, but also comprises
various courses in Philosophy, Literature,
History, Art History and Archeology that
cover either Antiquity or Middle Ages and
Modern Times.
The same practice is attested in
Departments focused in Area Studies on
Italy, Spain, and Russia. Quite contrarily,
and for reasons pertaining to the nucleus
of the perfidious forgery of History as
27. carried out by the colonial machinations,
this practice did not apply to the
historically most important people of the
last 3000 years: the Aramaeans. Why this
happened, and how this academic forgery
will be contravened we will analyze in a
separate article.
Μπορείτε να κατεβάσετε το άρθρο του κ.
Μεγαλομμάτη σε Word doc εδώ:
https://www.academia.edu/34785813/Ob
livious_Colonial_Orientalists_and_Aramae
ology_a_Prohibited_Science