The social security system administered by the Commonwealth Government; Payments for war veterans and their dependants; A mix of compulsory and voluntary occupational superannuation; The health care system; Compensation arrangements for work injuries and deaths; Compensation arrangements for road accident injuries and deaths; Life and contingency insurance; Paid sick leave; and Other cash and in-kind welfare benefits.
06_Joeri Van Speybroek_Dell_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pdf
Social Protection in Australia
1. David Stanton
Visiting Fellow
Crawford School of Public Policy
david.stanton@anu.edu.au
Social Protection in Australia
Presentation to
DFAT Social Protection Workshop
10 and 11 June 2014
2. Background to Presentation
• My background
• Structure of Presentation
– Concepts and Terms
– Social Protection in Australia
– Australia in International Context
– Some Lessons
3. Social Protection
Whiteford and Angenent (2001) consider that social protection in Australia
comprises:
• The social security system administered by the Commonwealth
Government;
• Payments for war veterans and their dependants;
• A mix of compulsory and voluntary occupational superannuation;
• The health care system;
• Compensation arrangements for work injuries and deaths;
• Compensation arrangements for road accident injuries and deaths;
• Life and contingency insurance;
• Paid sick leave; and
• Other cash and in-kind welfare benefits.
4. Social Security: Various Definitions
• US Social Security Act 1935. Coverage for risks of old age, death,
disability and unemployment. ”Welfare” different.
• William Beveridge (Nov 1942). Securing income in the event of
unemployment, sickness or accident, retirement, widowhood and other
exceptional circumstances.
• Tom Kewley (1973). Focussed on social security pensions, benefits and
allowances provided by the Commonwealth of Australia.
• ILO (1984). Protection against risks
4
5. Social Protection
• My focus will be on social security, which
Directly affects almost every Australian at some time
Accounts for the largest component of spending by the
national government
Outlays on social security and welfare are estimated to be
$145.8 billion in 2014-15, representing 35% of total outlays
and 8.9% of GDP.
Is even more significant when allowance is made for
mandated superannuation and “tax expenditures”
5
7. Social protection
Australian social security system different to most other countries.
Europe and some other countries - most government benefits are financed
by contributions from employers and insured employees, and benefits are
often related to past earnings.
The “social insurance approach” has a lineage going back to Chancellor
Bismark (The Iron Chancellor) who introduced social legislation to inhibit
unrest in Germany in the 1880’s.
7
8. Social protection in Australia
• Most government benefits are flat-rate entitlements financed from
general government revenue, and there are no explicit social
security taxes.
• Most benefits are income-tested or asset-tested, so that entitlements
reduce as resources increase.
• Eligibility is based on residence and coverage of the population is
broad.
• Duration of payment receipt is not time limited.
8
9. Social protection
• What guides policy decisions: the Seven Es
Equity - horizontal, vertical (including adequacy, keeping a fair share of personal
income, taking account of earning capacity)
Effectiveness – practicality, simplicity, ‘take-up’, achieving social goals (family stability,
well-being of children etc)
Employment – work incentives, link to education, social participation.
Efficiency - economic, administrative, ‘target’ (and maybe ‘churning’)
Economy – costs (benefits and administration)
Environment – the sixth E
• Expediency – the seventh E, ‘the elephant in the room’.
• See Stanton and Herscovitch (2013).
9
10.
11. Centenary of the Australian Age Pension
On 6 July 2009, the Hon. Jenny Macklin MP, unveiled a plaque and
memorial commemorating the centenary of the first payments of the Age
Pension.
It is located near the Department of the Treasury building in the
Parliamentary Triangle in Canberra.
The memorial refers to three key aspects the contribution of the age
pension : Security, Dignity, and Support.
11
12.
13. History of social protection
• In the beginning
Before 1900 –mostly charitable relief but no Poor Law.
Denmark(1891) and New Zealand (1898)
Age and invalid (disability) pensions came first in Australia (NSW
and Victoria in 1900 and Queensland in 1907, then the
Commonwealth in 1909 and 1910)
13
14. History of social protection
Set the pattern – funded from tax revenue, no social insurance
contributions, no link to previous earnings, means-tested
Experience of other countries, particularly in Europe, had been studied
closely
Maternity allowance in 1912 – also funded from tax revenue, no link to
earnings (but no means test)
Comprehensive schemes (social insurance) proposed at
Commonwealth level in 1928 and 1938, but fell by the wayside
14
15. History of social protection
• The 1940s: a defining decade
New provisions introduced –children, widows, unemployed
Commitment to full employment
The Social Services Contribution (later integrated with income tax)
Uniform income tax, the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Social
Security
Constitutional change in 1946. Earlier successful challenge on
pharmaceutical payments.
Governance – a new department and the consolidated Social Services
(later Social Security) Act
15
16. History of social protection
• The 1950s and 1960s: consolidation and means test easing
• The 1970s and 1980s: the pace quickens
Means testing, new benefits, family allowances, indexation,
carers, child support.
Commissions of inquiry into national superannuation and
national compensation.
Poverty Inquiry (Henderson) and Social Security Review (Cass)
Health insurance (1972) and personal services
16
17. History of social protection
• The 1990s: relentless change
Budget restraint
Many changes (disability, families, individual income testing,
pension rates, carers)
Tax reform
Governance: the creation of Centrelink (1997) and Family and
Community Services (1998)
• Superannuation grows (1992 changes)
• New Social Security Act
17
18. History of social protection
• The new century – taxation and retirement incomes
Superannuation liberalised
Rises in rates of pension
Means test on pensions liberalised, but sustainability and
affordability concerns then led to tightening
Age pension age to rise to 67, but superannuation benefits still to
be normally payable at 60
• The Henry and Harmer reviews
• CLASS EXERCISE
18
19. History of social protection
• Why did Australia’s system develop as it has?
State precedents (particularly NSW and before that N.Z.)
Seen as fairer to base rights on present needs rather than past
contributions
Australia’s sense of itself as a pioneer
Social insurance protections embedded in other ways such as
minimum wages, paid sick leave, workers’ compensation and
(more recently) superannuation. “Wage earners welfare state”.
System seen as having the advantage of flexibility to deal with
emerging issues.
Inertia can’t be discounted either – ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’
19
20. Abbott Coalition Government (2013- )
Re-establishment of the Ministry and Department of Social Services.
Welfare Review established under Patrick McClure to examine working age
payments, including Newstart Allowance and the Disability Support
Pension. (McClure undertook a similar review for the Howard Government
in 1999-2000).
Debate on the affordability and sustainability of the existing social protection
system. Joe Hockey and “end of the age of entitlement”
20
21. Abbott Coalition Government (2013- )
Commission of Audit established in October 2013 chaired by Mr Tony
Shepherd, President of the Business Council of Australia. Reported in May
2014.
The Committee made wide ranging recommendations for
changes/efficiencies in the social security system to ensure it was “more
sustainable and better targeted”.
The 2014-15 Budget was presented by the Treasurer, the Hon. Joe Hockey
M.P., on Tuesday 13 May 2014. The Budget picked up a number of the
recommendations of the Commission of Audit.
21
22. Future of social protection in Australia
Dealing with economic storms and short-term cost pressures
Long-term sustainability issues/ageing of the population
Need to raise benefit rates for unemployed people and sole
parents
Reform of superannuation, including superannuation tax
concessions.
Double dipping - poverty targetting and non-mandatory
annuitisation
Examining the system as a whole. A life cycle approach.
More integrated administration and a simpler system.
22
23. Australia’s tax/benefit system and the OECD
Australia has:
the most progressive structure of benefits and as a percentage of household income, net
benefits to the poorest 20% of the population are among the highest in the OECD.
one of the most progressive systems of direct taxes in the OECD, and has low and very
progressive taxes on retirement age households.
less “middle class welfare” than any other country, lower churning than nearly all other
countries, and the highest level of transfer efficiency in reducing inequality and poverty.
many strengths – it targets the poor effectively at lower budgetary cost than many other
systems, so is more likely to be sustainable in the medium to long term.
A system that has become increasingly complex over time.
23
24. Trends in social spending in Australia relative
to OECD average, 1980 to 2013 Source: Whiteford 2014
24
26. 26
Net redistribution to the poor is high
Net transfers received by poorest quintile as % of household disposable income
Source: Whiteford 2014
27. The Australian Model and Other Countries: ILO and World Bank
Traditional views of the ILO and the World Bank.
Now recognise diversity and the importance of context. No “one size fits all” model.
World Bank “three pillar model”.
The World Bank and “basic” or “zero” pillar (or perhaps a “foundation” for the other
pillars) to protect the poor.
The ILO now supports a basic floor approach to ensure a least a widespread basic
level of social security for all. June 2012 Rec. 202 on National Floors on Social
Protection.
Interest in “social pensions”. Increasing interest in Australian experience with general
revenue financed system.
27
28. The Australian Model and Other Countries
The two main system designs amongst developed nations:
Some, like Australia, New Zealand and the UK, have long given more
weight to poverty alleviation, providing flat-rate government pensions
and benefits (or minimum income guarantees), often means-tested;
Others, such as most European nations and the US, have long given
more weight to ‘social insurance’, providing earnings-related benefits
linked to compulsory contributions.
Robin Hood versus Piggy Bank.
28
29. The Australian Model and Other Countries: Observations
History, culture and social values, as well as economic capacity.
Once you start down a particular path it can have a significant influence on
the future. Issues of “path dependency”.
Can also get to an end point by various paths. Superannuation in Australia
and social insurance objective of income replacement.
“Off the shelf” models or “one size fits all” schemes and policies rarely
have lasting impact
29
30. The Australian Model and Other Countries: Observations
Need to examine social protection systems in context. e.g. the “age
pension” versus the overall system of retirement incomes.
Social security reform needs to be integrated with economic reform.
Be conscious of the implications of complexity
Policy implementation, administrative efficiency and service delivery.
Bring others with you, including staff, customers and citizens.
CLASS EXERCISE
30
31. The wisdom of others
Chinese sayings:
• “Only he who has travelled the path knows where the holes are deepest”
• “Cross the stream by feeling the pebbles with your toes”
• “The mountains are high and the Emperor is far away”
• “ It doesn’t matter if the cat is white or black as long as it catches the mouse”
Arab saying: “The camel driver has a plan but so does the camel”
George Santayana:” Those who cannot remember the past are condemned
to repeat it”
Winston Churchill: “History will be kind to me for I intend to write it”
Wellington NZ. On the wall of the Te Papa Museum. Maori instruction to the
young: “Embrace the past. Prepare now to shape the future”.
31
32. Source Material
• Herscovitch A. and Stanton D. 2008, ‘History of Social Security in Australia’, Family Matters, No.
80, pp. 51-60.
• Jackson L. and Bozic S. 1997, ‘The Australian Social Security Model: Revisiting the International
Debate’, Social Security Journal, Department of Social Security, Commonwealth of Australia,
September, pp 32-35.
• Andrew Podger A, Stanton D. and Whiteford P. 2014, ‘Designing Social Security Systems:
Learning from Australia and Other Countries’, Public Administration and Development
(Forthcoming)
• Stanton D. and Herscovitch A. 2013,”Social Policy and Programs: From Principles to Design”,
Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies (APPS) Working Paper Series, 01/2013, April.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=22588099
32
33. Source Material (Continued)
• Whiteford P. Stanton D. and Gray M. 2001,‘Families and income security: Changing patterns of
social security and related policy issues’, Family Matters, Issue No. 60, Spring/Summer, pp. 24-
35).
• Whiteford P. 2014, Lecture to Principles of Social Policy Post Graduate Course at the Crawford
School of Public Policy, ANU, 7 March 2014.
• Whiteford P. and Angenent G. 2001, ‘The Australian System of Social protection - An Overview’,
Occasional Paper No 6, Department of Family and Community Services, Commonwealth of
Australia, Canberra.
33