This document discusses setting and assessing learning standards in higher education. It outlines the regulatory context for learning standards and discusses how standards are being set through engagement with discipline communities. It also discusses options for assessing learning standards, including perceptions surveys, common tests, and external moderation initiatives. The document analyzes several moderation projects currently taking place, including the Achievement Matters project which involves benchmarking assessment tasks across several Australian universities. It addresses challenges in implementing learning standards for higher education institutions and regulatory bodies.
Best Works Processes For Using E Portfolios And A Wiki To Showcase, Exchange,...WCET
ePortfolios and Wikis both allow collection of best works and information, continuous updating, and easy peer feedback.
Northwestern State University adopted guidelines for ePortfolios by adult students to showcase their work. The ePortfolios, are evaluated by faculty to award credit.
Kansas State University developed the ELearning and Teaching Exchange (ELATE) Wiki to provide a platform for faculty and other interested individuals to share teaching and learning best practices and to build upon each others contributions.
This panel will demonstrate the uses of these applications and how they can enhance information sharing.
MACRO & INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF OCCUPATIONAL BASED LEARNING CIMAP
The power of institutionalized education despite national acceptance of the NQF
Inherent resistance to change in societies.
The impact of how we have all experienced education
How much has fundamentally changed in education ?
The perceived social value of formal education.
Best Works Processes For Using E Portfolios And A Wiki To Showcase, Exchange,...WCET
ePortfolios and Wikis both allow collection of best works and information, continuous updating, and easy peer feedback.
Northwestern State University adopted guidelines for ePortfolios by adult students to showcase their work. The ePortfolios, are evaluated by faculty to award credit.
Kansas State University developed the ELearning and Teaching Exchange (ELATE) Wiki to provide a platform for faculty and other interested individuals to share teaching and learning best practices and to build upon each others contributions.
This panel will demonstrate the uses of these applications and how they can enhance information sharing.
MACRO & INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF OCCUPATIONAL BASED LEARNING CIMAP
The power of institutionalized education despite national acceptance of the NQF
Inherent resistance to change in societies.
The impact of how we have all experienced education
How much has fundamentally changed in education ?
The perceived social value of formal education.
Proving to improve - UA Summit of Deans CouncilsMark Freeman
We report a positive benefit-cost ratio for a model of external assurance of learning uncovered by a project called Achievement Matters. It critically relies on and elevates reviewers first developing shared understandings of standards through calibration forums which include practitioners.
Perfecting Impactful Presentations - ACE 2015Josh Paine
Perfecting Impactful Presentations by Josh Paine and Cindy Allen, University of Georgia. Given at Association of Communication Excellence Conference in June 2015.
Get the RoI: Maximise Business Impact with eLearning24x7 Learning
Read this presentation to know:
-Ways to build product knowledge among your front-line employees
-How to consistently train your entire workforce with same level of rigor and application
- How to address key priorities such as training man-days, budget-cuts and coverage
-How to ensure a direct link between your business objectives & your training agenda
- How to include a blended approach in your training initiative for maximum impact
Visit www.24x7learning.com/resources.html To download the presentation
Or
Write to vinita.tyagi@24x7learning.com if you want a copy of this presentation
Connect to Us:
Facebook: facebook.com/24x7LearningIndia
Twitter: twitter.com/24x7learning
LinkedIn: lnkd.in/6qD2pY
Proving to improve - UA Summit of Deans CouncilsMark Freeman
We report a positive benefit-cost ratio for a model of external assurance of learning uncovered by a project called Achievement Matters. It critically relies on and elevates reviewers first developing shared understandings of standards through calibration forums which include practitioners.
Perfecting Impactful Presentations - ACE 2015Josh Paine
Perfecting Impactful Presentations by Josh Paine and Cindy Allen, University of Georgia. Given at Association of Communication Excellence Conference in June 2015.
Get the RoI: Maximise Business Impact with eLearning24x7 Learning
Read this presentation to know:
-Ways to build product knowledge among your front-line employees
-How to consistently train your entire workforce with same level of rigor and application
- How to address key priorities such as training man-days, budget-cuts and coverage
-How to ensure a direct link between your business objectives & your training agenda
- How to include a blended approach in your training initiative for maximum impact
Visit www.24x7learning.com/resources.html To download the presentation
Or
Write to vinita.tyagi@24x7learning.com if you want a copy of this presentation
Connect to Us:
Facebook: facebook.com/24x7LearningIndia
Twitter: twitter.com/24x7learning
LinkedIn: lnkd.in/6qD2pY
Leading workforce development and planning solutions v0.2 wp 20.8.12Workforce BluePrint
Move from VET to Workforce Development, Workforce Productivity theory, business case, definitions, 5 step model, case studies and examples, RTOs leading, common workforce development gaps and strategies, skills and competencies vs. capabilities, links and info.
How are Quality Assurance Agencies Evaluating and Supporting the Quality of D...Mark Brown
Opening presentation at International Quality Assurance Standards, Practices and Supports for Digital Higher Education, Online Conference, OECD, 14th June
Richard Moulds discussed business IT strategies. How to lead multi functional teams and sevarl case studies within the public and particular healthcare sector were used.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
1. Setting and assessing standards
Status, options and challenges
Mark Freeman
mark.freeman@sydney.edu.au mark.freeman@abdc.edu.au
2. Outline
1. Regulatory context
2. Setting learning standards
3. Assessing learning standards
4. Evaluating moderation options
5. Q & A
Support for this project has been provided by the Australian Business Deans Council, the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in Australia, CPA Australia and the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. The
views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of any of these stakeholders.
3. I have I can‟t I said that I had
taught hear him taught him, not
Snoopy whistle that he had
to whistle learned
4. Definitions
Standards
“a definite level of excellence or attainment, or a definite degree of any
quality viewed as a prescribed object of endeavour or as the recognised
measure of what is adequate for some purpose, so established by
authority, custom, or consensus” (Sadler, 2009)
Learning outcomes
“the expression of the set of knowledge, skills and the application of the
knowledge and skills a person has acquired and is able to demonstrate as
a result of learning” (AQF, 2011)
Learning standards
“the explicit levels of attainment required of and achieved by students and
graduates, individually and collectively, in defined areas of knowledge and
skills” (DEEWR, 2011)
7. Provider
Threshold
Qualifications
TEQSA Teaching and Learning
Research
Information
“At this point [the learning and teaching
standards] are not threshold standards [but] (ie. internal
„Fitness-for-purpose‟ „standards‟ external)
what the government may choose to do in the
Higher Education Standards Panel consult Ministers
future remains to be seen.“
Commissioners
Teaching standards separate from learning standards
The Australian 24 Aug 2011
8. TEQSA legislation
...take account of external standards.. e.g. published discipline standards...
...standards intended ...and ..actually achieved ....are benchmarked
...awards ...meet the corresponding specifications ...described in the AQF
TEQSA regulatory risk framework
9. T & L Standards Discussion Paper - principle 3 & 5
“TEQSA is not the only custodian of standards, nor are
higher education institutions. This responsibility is
distributed and shared more widely, including with
disciplinary communities and professional associations”
“Institutional standards for teaching and learning will differ
but all institutions must meet or surpass national standards”
10. Setting learning standards
“Discipline communities will „own‟ and
take responsibility for implementing
teaching and learning standards (working
with professional bodies and other
stakeholders where appropriate) within
the academic traditions of collegiality,
peer review, pre-eminence of disciplines
and, importantly, academic autonomy”
DEEWR (2009, p. 32)
11. 9 discipline groups in 4 waves – 11 sets defined
Jul’09 Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities
Business, Management & Economics
Engineering & ICT
Feb’10 Creative & Performing Arts
Health, Medicine & Vet Science
Law
Jul’10 Architecture, Design & Building
Science
Feb’11 Education
12. Business, Management and Economics
Accounting Degrees
Banking, Finance & Related Fields
• Bachelor
Business Information Studies • Management
Business Master (Entry)
• Master (Advanced)
Economics and Econometrics Hospitality Management
Cycles
Human Resource Industrial Relations setting
1. Agenda
Management 2. Awareness raising
3. Consultation
International Business Organisation Management
4. Dissemination
Marketing Sport and Recreation
Engagement
• 2,100 participants nationally
Tourism Management Missing• (eg. Australian universities
38 Logistics)
• 21 private/other providers
• 20 others (eg professional
and peak bodies)
13. Provider A Provider B Provider C Provider D
Judgement Judgement Judgement Judgement +
Knowledge Knowledge Knowledge Knowledge +
Application Application Application Application +
Communication Communication Communication + Communication +
& Teamwork & Teamwork & Teamwork & Teamwork
Self Self Self Self +
Management Management Management Management
Small business
Quantitative Professional
Public sector Regional
Chalk + talk Online learning Problem-based Team-based
learning learning learning
19. Assessing learning standards
1. Perceptions – employers, graduates, professional bodies
eg. AGS/CEQ; professional body accreditation
2. Common test – ACER, CLA, AHELO
“many graduates already subjected to skills testing for employment”
3. External moderation – UK, Go8, Krause, ABDC-Prof Bodies
“Assessment is largely dependent upon professional judgement and
confidence in such judgement requires the establishment of appropriate
forums for the development and sharing of standards within and between
disciplinary and professional communities” (Tenet 6: Price et al, 2008)
20. Moderation initiatives
QVS Krause-Scott et al Achievement Mat
Scope Multiple Multiple Accounting
Level Bachelor Bachelor Bach + Mast
HEI grouping Go8 11 across Start 10 across
Reviewers 1 academic 1 academic 2 aca/professionals
Data selection Stratified Stratified Randomised
Sample size 5% HD/D/C/P/F 1 HD/D/C/P/F per partner 5
Products All unit‟s tasks All unit‟s tasks Specific threshold
Intent Verification (QA) Qlty assurance & Qlty QA & QE
Enhancement (QE)
Authority Top-down Top-down Bottom-up
21. Achievement Matters Project
Aims
1. Evidence of accounting academic standards
• External, double-blind, peer-reviewed
• Benchmark against national consensus (Bachelor & Master)
• All HEP types
2. A model process for obtaining and using evidence
• Assessing inputs & outputs
• Quality enhancement & assurance
3. Professional learning and capacity building
Rationale: Improve, self-regulate, avoid perverse options
Pilot: Adelaide, Curtin, Deakin, Griffith, Monash, RMIT, Southern Cross,
Sydney, USQ, UWA, UWS
22. Pilot cycle: Threshold standard written communication
Graduates of a Bachelor/Master (Entry) degree would be
expected to justify and communicate accounting advice and
ideas in straightforward/diverse collaborative contexts
involving both accountants and non-accountants.
Master (entry): Diverse = Several competing or new qualitative
perspectives and/or quantitative perspectives characterised by
considerable data items, over multiple variables and known
relationships between them.
Bachelor: Straightforward = few qualitative perspectives and/or
quantitative perspectives characterised by considerable data items
over multiple variables and known relationships between them
23. Reaching consensus on assessment task validity
Assess Enter Compare
Pre-F2F
Consensus Agree
F2F
Implement
Post-F2F
2
24. Calibrating and grading to the standard
Assess Enter Compare
Pre-F2F
Consensus Agree
F2F
Apply
• to assignment if student
Post-F2F • to marking if faculty
2
26. Calibration – task validity
Individual results pre-workshop
• Min & max (n=26)
NA A
• Mean ±1 SD
Group results at workshop
• Small groups (n=5)
NA A
• Consensus
27. Calibration – UG student 1
Individual results pre-workshop
• Min & max (n=26) NM M
• Mean ±1 SD
Group results at workshop
• Small groups (n=5)
NM M
• Consensus
28. Calibration – PG student 1
Individual results pre-workshop
• Min & max (n=26)
NM M
• Mean ± 1 SD
Group results at workshop
• Small groups (n=5)
NM M
• Consensus
29. Confirmation – PG student 5
Individual results at workshop
• Min & max (n=20)
NM M
• Mean ±1 SD
Group results at workshop
• Small groups (n=5)
NM M
• Consensus
30. Participant feedback
Having to enter my feedback into SPARK
caused me to reflect on the reasons for my
judgement
I expect this project will help establish
national agreement on academic standards
between accounting degree providers and
with employers
35. Challenges
TEQSA
1. How will standards be set and monitored in a way that is
sensible, fair, accepted and still economic?
HEI
1. How should we engage in disciplines setting standards?
2. How should agreed disciplinary learning standards be
implemented into our curriculum?
3. How can we best participate in collaborative initiatives
assessing achievement against national benchmarks?
4. How should evidence from our participation in national
moderation projects be reported and used?
5. What systems changes and professional development are
needed here to prepare for the standards agenda?
Linus has the blanket and is talking to Charlie Brown
TEQSA - will be a statutory authority of the Federal Government established in the second half of 2010 and >AUQA functionsProvider standards – National protocols and ESOS (eg. appro staffing profile to deliver educational niche; academics undertaking scholarship, and research if supervising HDR students) ……http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/national_protocols_for_higher_education_mainpage,15212.html Qualification standards: Australian Qualifications FrameworkLearning and Teaching Standards: Academic Standards, Learning outcomesResearch standards: Excellence in Research in AustraliaInformation standards – for the market and regulatorsQA model not yet finalized, but it is likely it more expansive and have a stronger remit over AUQA. From 2012 TEQSA will: build upon self-regulation processes and will accredit providers unis in 2012 and 2013 VETevaluate the performance of institutions and programs against nationally-agreed standards (measured by minimum learning outcomes); evaluate at-risk areas using a proportionate model; use a range of sanctions to promote high quality encourage best practiceprovide greater national consistency
The course of study meets the Qualification Standards.1.2 There are robust internal processes for design and approval of the course of study, which:• provide realistic projections of the demand and resources required for the course of study;• take account of external standards and requirements, e.g. published discipline standards, professional accreditation, input from relevant external stakeholders, and comparable standards at other higher education providers; and,• provide for appropriate development of key graduate attributes in students including English language proficiency.2.1 Resourcing for the course of study is adequate to meet the higher education provider’s projected enrolments for the course of study and for students to achieve the expected learning outcomes3.1 Admission criteria for the course of study:• are appropriate for the Qualification Standards level of the course of study and required learning outcomes;3.2 The higher education provider ensures that students who are enrolled are sufficiently competent in the English language to participate effectively in the course of study and achieve its expected learning outcomes, and sets English language entry requirements accordingly.4.2 The higher education provider ensures that staff who teach students in the course of study:• are appropriately qualified in the relevant discipline for their level of teaching (qualified to at least one Qualification Standards level higher than the course of study being taught or with equivalent professional experience);• have a sound understanding of current scholarship and/or professional practice in the discipline that they teach;• have an understanding of pedagogical and/or adult learning principles relevant to the student cohort being taught;• engage students in intellectual inquiry appropriate to the level of the course of study and unit being taught; and,• are advised of student and other feedback on the quality of their teaching and have opportunities to improve their teaching.5.4 The higher education provider maintains, monitors and acts on comparative data on the performance of students in the course of study, including information on the performance of student cohorts by entry pathway, mode of study and place of study, such data to include: student attrition; student progress; course completions; and grade distributions.5.5 The academic standards intended to be achieved by students and the standards actually achieved by students in the course of study are benchmarked against similar accredited courses of study offered by other higher education providers.5.6 The higher education provider is able to demonstrate appropriate progression and completion rates and that students who complete the course of study have attained key graduate attributes including an appropriate level of English language proficiency.
Additional LO and higher standards beyond threshold LO quite possible and very much encoruaged as part of Total number of meetings held: 489Total number of attendees at meetings: 7090 Number of persons on your email contact list: 3579
Diversity protectedIndividual HEI choose additional LO (eg. 9 if 7 threshold LO and wish to emphasise something like behavioural or quantiative outcomes); higher learning outcomes (eg. a pass at Uni XXX might be far in excess of the threshold)Autonomy protectedIndividual HEI choose how deliver (eg. PBL, lect/tutes; WIL; TBL) & assess (capstones; e-portfolio)Reputations protected Sample graded work is reviewed by registered peer experts who review HEP standards against threshold LOSupports accreditation & benchmarkingAcademics and professionals working together (extending prof and international accreditation)HOME – Opportunity for 1 or 2 questions before moving on?
Beverley What capabilitiesshould be(lots)How design to implement and map (some)How do we evidence them ( a few)How improve from benchmarking (almost none)Participating providers nominate their peer reviewers and implement the necessary processes to identify and collect the relevant inputs and outputs. Five pieces of student sample work for each learning outcome under review from each HEP will be randomly selected, de-identified and sent to the Independent Assessment Data Coordinator (IADC). Related assessment requirements and supporting documentation will also be submitted. The required number of pieces is considered sufficient to gauge standards without making the process too onerous, but will be re-evaluated after the pilot. Prior to peer review, each participant will undergo training in the software (SPARKPLUS) used to collect peer reviews and grade exemplars to calibrate standards. The first national face-to-face workshop is in Darwin immediately following the AFAANZ conference.The IADC will oversee anonymity of sample work (and assessment requirements) and allocate two peers for (double blind) review of the work. Each item sampled will be graded online as ‘meeting’ or ‘not meeting’ the threshold learning outcomes. Each HEP will submit their own grading of meeting/not meeting benchmarked against the specific national thresholds under review. The latter could well be different to the grade the piece received originally when all assessment criteria were considered. There will be no change to the mark awarded to the student by the HEP arising from any peer review feedback.The IADC will oversee tracking, aggregation and return of confidential anonymous reviews to the relevant HEP, together with the aggregate results. Only individual qualitative comments are returned initially to promote internal quality enhancement discussions at each HEP.Participants discuss possible intended quality enhancements to their respective programs at a face-to-face forum and clarify explanations for grade variances from national standards allocated by peer reviewers (distributed at the forum).
Beverley What capabilitiesshould be(lots)How design to implement and map (some)How do we evidence them ( a few)How improve from benchmarking (almost none)Participating providers nominate their peer reviewers and implement the necessary processes to identify and collect the relevant inputs and outputs. Five pieces of student sample work for each learning outcome under review from each HEP will be randomly selected, de-identified and sent to the Independent Assessment Data Coordinator (IADC). Related assessment requirements and supporting documentation will also be submitted. The required number of pieces is considered sufficient to gauge standards without making the process too onerous, but will be re-evaluated after the pilot. Prior to peer review, each participant will undergo training in the software (SPARKPLUS) used to collect peer reviews and grade exemplars to calibrate standards. The first national face-to-face workshop is in Darwin immediately following the AFAANZ conference.The IADC will oversee anonymity of sample work (and assessment requirements) and allocate two peers for (double blind) review of the work. Each item sampled will be graded online as ‘meeting’ or ‘not meeting’ the threshold learning outcomes. Each HEP will submit their own grading of meeting/not meeting benchmarked against the specific national thresholds under review. The latter could well be different to the grade the piece received originally when all assessment criteria were considered. There will be no change to the mark awarded to the student by the HEP arising from any peer review feedback.The IADC will oversee tracking, aggregation and return of confidential anonymous reviews to the relevant HEP, together with the aggregate results. Only individual qualitative comments are returned initially to promote internal quality enhancement discussions at each HEP.Participants discuss possible intended quality enhancements to their respective programs at a face-to-face forum and clarify explanations for grade variances from national standards allocated by peer reviewers (distributed at the forum).
INTERACTION 2: HWO MIGHT YOU APPLY THIS PROCESS IN YOUR CONTEXT?
TEQSA will have best practice database – but what else?Questions for GU?Eg. how will GU disciplines provide valid and reliable evidence of LS and TS? How will GU undertake curriculum renewal processes to ensure PLO are achieved?