1

BUSINESS POLICY TERM PROJECT

SERVICE INDUSTRIES
LIMITED
(TYRES & TUBES)
Presented By:
M. A. Hanan Rasool

6/22/2012

Presented To: Prof. F. A. Fareedy
The Company
2

Established in 1953

Went Public in 1968

Service
Industries
Limited
Manufacturing

Tyres &
Tubes

Plant Capacity 28,500,000
Tyres per year

Annual Turnover around
Rs. 12 billion for 2011

Service Sales
Corporation

Retail
Outlets

Shoes

Distribut
ors
Wholesal
e / Retail

6/20/2012
Project Objective
3

Devise a comprehensive business strategy for
Service Industries Limited (SIL), with a view to
GAINING AND MAINTAINING a sustainable

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

6/20/2012
Industry Analysis
Market Share

4

60%

MC Tyres

20%

51%
39%

50%
40%

40%

• Panther
• Servis
• Diamond

46% 44%

0%
2009
Servis

2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Average Growth Rate

10%

10%

10%

2010

2011

Panther

OEM Tyres Demand
1,040,248
934,534
1,321,186
1,018,108
1,473,722
1,677,100
1928665 (forecasted)

Others

Growth Rate
25%
-10%
41%
-23%
45%
14%
15%

Note: The figures do not include the production companies who are not members of the Association.
Internal Factor Analysis Summary
5

Industry’s Internal Factors

Weight

Rating

Weighted Score

Comments

Economies of scale and
volume based business

0.2

5

1

High level of fixed costs

Only a few competitors

0.05

4

0.2

Defines the nature of competition

Increasing demand trend

0.1

3

0.3

More motorcycles produced, more
tyre demand

Higher barriers of entry

0.1

4

0.4

Very high start-up costs

Export potential

0.05

2

0.1

Pakistani tyre costs less to produce

0.15

2

0.3

Decreases the chance of survival

Limited number of skilled labor

0.1

5

0.5

Increases emphasis on employee retention

Capital intensive in nature

0.1

4

0.4

Difficulty in expansion plans

Requires Technical Expertise

0.05

5

0.25

Technical staff required to run factory

High intensity of competition

0.1

3

0.3

High marketing and promotional
costs

1

-

3.75

-

Strengths

Weaknesses
Low profit margins

Total
External Factor Summary Analysis
6
Industry’s External Factors

Weight

Rating

Weighted Score

Comments

Strategic alliances

0.2

4

0.8

Market is yet to be
segmented

0.2

3

0.6

Diversification
manufacturing

0.05

1

0.05

Concentric diversification - related product

Retreading of tyres to save costs

0.05

2

0.1

Save costs on raw materials

Government lobbying for tax rebates

0.1

4

0.4

Important incentive to export

0.05

4

0.2

Increasing market competition in industry

0.15

3

0.45

Reducing overall demand from OEMs

0.2

4

0.8

Raises cost of production

1

-

3.4

-

Opportunities

into

car

tyres

Alliances with OEMs for long-term
contracts
Opportunity to breakdown the market
and position product accordingly

Threats
Tyre Imports from China

Imports of Chinese
motorcycles
Electricity crisis
Total

6/20/2012
Strategic Factor Summary Analysis
7

Weight

Rating

Weighted
Score

Comments

(O) Strategic alliances

0.2

3

0.6

Alliances with OEMs for long-term
contracts

(O) Market is yet to be
segmented

0.2

3

0.6

Opportunity to breakdown the market
and position product accordingly

(S) Government lobbying for tax
rebates

0.1

4

0.4

Important incentive to export

(T) Electricity crisis

0.1

4

0.4

Raises cost of production

(S) Increasing demand
trend

0.15

3

0.45

More motorcycles produced, more tyre
demand

(W) Low profit margins

0.1

2

0.2

Decreases the chance of survival

(W) High intensity of competition

0.15

2

0.3

High marketing and promotional costs

1

-

2.95

-

Strategic Factors

Total

6/20/2012
The New Strategy
8

Marketin
g STP

• Product
Differentiation
• Promotions
and
Advertising
• Need Based
Segmentation
Strategi
c
Alliance
s–
OEM’s

New
Strategy

Reduce
Costs
Internall
y

• Pre-Selling

•
•
•
•

Inventory
Re-word
Operational Costs
COGS

Develop
Export
Markets

Penetrat
ion
Pricing

• Put financial
Strain on
Panther

6/20/2012
Thank You

6/20/2012

Business Policy MBA Term Project Service Industries Limited - Tyres and Tubes

  • 1.
    1 BUSINESS POLICY TERMPROJECT SERVICE INDUSTRIES LIMITED (TYRES & TUBES) Presented By: M. A. Hanan Rasool 6/22/2012 Presented To: Prof. F. A. Fareedy
  • 2.
    The Company 2 Established in1953 Went Public in 1968 Service Industries Limited Manufacturing Tyres & Tubes Plant Capacity 28,500,000 Tyres per year Annual Turnover around Rs. 12 billion for 2011 Service Sales Corporation Retail Outlets Shoes Distribut ors Wholesal e / Retail 6/20/2012
  • 3.
    Project Objective 3 Devise acomprehensive business strategy for Service Industries Limited (SIL), with a view to GAINING AND MAINTAINING a sustainable COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE 6/20/2012
  • 4.
    Industry Analysis Market Share 4 60% MCTyres 20% 51% 39% 50% 40% 40% • Panther • Servis • Diamond 46% 44% 0% 2009 Servis 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Average Growth Rate 10% 10% 10% 2010 2011 Panther OEM Tyres Demand 1,040,248 934,534 1,321,186 1,018,108 1,473,722 1,677,100 1928665 (forecasted) Others Growth Rate 25% -10% 41% -23% 45% 14% 15% Note: The figures do not include the production companies who are not members of the Association.
  • 5.
    Internal Factor AnalysisSummary 5 Industry’s Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score Comments Economies of scale and volume based business 0.2 5 1 High level of fixed costs Only a few competitors 0.05 4 0.2 Defines the nature of competition Increasing demand trend 0.1 3 0.3 More motorcycles produced, more tyre demand Higher barriers of entry 0.1 4 0.4 Very high start-up costs Export potential 0.05 2 0.1 Pakistani tyre costs less to produce 0.15 2 0.3 Decreases the chance of survival Limited number of skilled labor 0.1 5 0.5 Increases emphasis on employee retention Capital intensive in nature 0.1 4 0.4 Difficulty in expansion plans Requires Technical Expertise 0.05 5 0.25 Technical staff required to run factory High intensity of competition 0.1 3 0.3 High marketing and promotional costs 1 - 3.75 - Strengths Weaknesses Low profit margins Total
  • 6.
    External Factor SummaryAnalysis 6 Industry’s External Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score Comments Strategic alliances 0.2 4 0.8 Market is yet to be segmented 0.2 3 0.6 Diversification manufacturing 0.05 1 0.05 Concentric diversification - related product Retreading of tyres to save costs 0.05 2 0.1 Save costs on raw materials Government lobbying for tax rebates 0.1 4 0.4 Important incentive to export 0.05 4 0.2 Increasing market competition in industry 0.15 3 0.45 Reducing overall demand from OEMs 0.2 4 0.8 Raises cost of production 1 - 3.4 - Opportunities into car tyres Alliances with OEMs for long-term contracts Opportunity to breakdown the market and position product accordingly Threats Tyre Imports from China Imports of Chinese motorcycles Electricity crisis Total 6/20/2012
  • 7.
    Strategic Factor SummaryAnalysis 7 Weight Rating Weighted Score Comments (O) Strategic alliances 0.2 3 0.6 Alliances with OEMs for long-term contracts (O) Market is yet to be segmented 0.2 3 0.6 Opportunity to breakdown the market and position product accordingly (S) Government lobbying for tax rebates 0.1 4 0.4 Important incentive to export (T) Electricity crisis 0.1 4 0.4 Raises cost of production (S) Increasing demand trend 0.15 3 0.45 More motorcycles produced, more tyre demand (W) Low profit margins 0.1 2 0.2 Decreases the chance of survival (W) High intensity of competition 0.15 2 0.3 High marketing and promotional costs 1 - 2.95 - Strategic Factors Total 6/20/2012
  • 8.
    The New Strategy 8 Marketin gSTP • Product Differentiation • Promotions and Advertising • Need Based Segmentation Strategi c Alliance s– OEM’s New Strategy Reduce Costs Internall y • Pre-Selling • • • • Inventory Re-word Operational Costs COGS Develop Export Markets Penetrat ion Pricing • Put financial Strain on Panther 6/20/2012
  • 9.