The campaign which puts paid to Napoleon's chances for ultimate victory. The Army of England is stymied by the Royal Navy in1803-1805. So Napoleon develops his Grand Design. With negative results.
Sea power 2-session 7-napoleon and nelsonJim Powers
Horatio Nelson and Napoleon Bonaparte were two ambitious military leaders who came to symbolize their respective nations of Britain and France in the late 18th century. In 1798, Bonaparte led a French expeditionary force in invading Egypt, hoping to establish a base to threaten British control of India. Unbeknownst to Bonaparte, the British admiral Nelson was searching the Mediterranean for the French fleet. Nelson's and Bonaparte's fleets narrowly missed encountering each other off the coast of Egypt. Nelson then departed Alexandria, allowing Bonaparte's forces to land unopposed. A few weeks later, Nelson received word of where the French fleet was anchored and prepared for a decisive battle.
Sea power 2 session 10-decline and fall of the French EmpireJim Powers
1) Pitt, the British Prime Minister, died in January 1806 after sacrificing his health to lead Britain against Napoleon. His death left a void, as his opponent Fox recognized.
2) Fox became Foreign Secretary and initiated peace talks with France, but Napoleon's increasing control over Europe and hostility towards Britain ended any chances for peace. Fox died six months later, realizing the depths of Napoleon's opposition.
3) At Tilsit in July 1807, Napoleon and the Russian Czar Alexander agreed to divide influence in Europe between France and Russia, with other countries expected to align with them. This threatened to give Napoleon control of naval forces that could challenge British sea power.
First of the final Sea Power series. While Britain was concluding her struggle with France America was creating a navy destined to be the most powerful the world has ever seen. Enjoy!
The Anglo-French struggle for empire continues. The last of Louis xiv's wars of aggression. Marlborough and Prince Eugene on land and the Royal Navy at sea bring France to the peace table. Revised
France joins the war on the side of the Americans in 1778 after providing them secret aid for two years. Vergennes, the French foreign minister, saw this as an opportunity to weaken Britain by depriving them of their North American colonies and trade. While Turgot warned against intervention that could damage French finances, Vergennes and others were eager to take revenge on Britain for losses in the Seven Years War. The stage was set for direct naval conflict between France and Britain in support of their respective allies in the American War of Independence.
The French and Indian War was a conflict between France and Britain over land in North America from 1754 to 1763. The war began with skirmishes over territory in the Ohio Valley between French and English colonists and their respective Indian allies. Though the French initially had success, the tide turned when William Pitt became British Prime Minister in 1757 and increased funding and troops. The British went on to capture Quebec in 1759 and Montreal in 1760, eliminating French control in North America. The war ended with the 1763 Treaty of Paris, in which France ceded its North American territories to Britain and Spain. Native Americans grew unhappy with the British after the war, leading to Pontiac's Rebellion from 1763 to 1766
Napoleon rose to power during the French Revolution. He had a successful early military career leading victories in Italy and Egypt. However, he was defeated in Egypt by the British navy. Returning to France as a hero, Napoleon launched a coup and became the First Consul, consolidating his power over time. He established himself as Emperor and expanded French control over much of Europe through military campaigns, while also instituting reforms like the Napoleonic Code. However, campaigns in Spain and Russia proved difficult and contributed to his eventual defeat.
Sea power 2-session 7-napoleon and nelsonJim Powers
Horatio Nelson and Napoleon Bonaparte were two ambitious military leaders who came to symbolize their respective nations of Britain and France in the late 18th century. In 1798, Bonaparte led a French expeditionary force in invading Egypt, hoping to establish a base to threaten British control of India. Unbeknownst to Bonaparte, the British admiral Nelson was searching the Mediterranean for the French fleet. Nelson's and Bonaparte's fleets narrowly missed encountering each other off the coast of Egypt. Nelson then departed Alexandria, allowing Bonaparte's forces to land unopposed. A few weeks later, Nelson received word of where the French fleet was anchored and prepared for a decisive battle.
Sea power 2 session 10-decline and fall of the French EmpireJim Powers
1) Pitt, the British Prime Minister, died in January 1806 after sacrificing his health to lead Britain against Napoleon. His death left a void, as his opponent Fox recognized.
2) Fox became Foreign Secretary and initiated peace talks with France, but Napoleon's increasing control over Europe and hostility towards Britain ended any chances for peace. Fox died six months later, realizing the depths of Napoleon's opposition.
3) At Tilsit in July 1807, Napoleon and the Russian Czar Alexander agreed to divide influence in Europe between France and Russia, with other countries expected to align with them. This threatened to give Napoleon control of naval forces that could challenge British sea power.
First of the final Sea Power series. While Britain was concluding her struggle with France America was creating a navy destined to be the most powerful the world has ever seen. Enjoy!
The Anglo-French struggle for empire continues. The last of Louis xiv's wars of aggression. Marlborough and Prince Eugene on land and the Royal Navy at sea bring France to the peace table. Revised
France joins the war on the side of the Americans in 1778 after providing them secret aid for two years. Vergennes, the French foreign minister, saw this as an opportunity to weaken Britain by depriving them of their North American colonies and trade. While Turgot warned against intervention that could damage French finances, Vergennes and others were eager to take revenge on Britain for losses in the Seven Years War. The stage was set for direct naval conflict between France and Britain in support of their respective allies in the American War of Independence.
The French and Indian War was a conflict between France and Britain over land in North America from 1754 to 1763. The war began with skirmishes over territory in the Ohio Valley between French and English colonists and their respective Indian allies. Though the French initially had success, the tide turned when William Pitt became British Prime Minister in 1757 and increased funding and troops. The British went on to capture Quebec in 1759 and Montreal in 1760, eliminating French control in North America. The war ended with the 1763 Treaty of Paris, in which France ceded its North American territories to Britain and Spain. Native Americans grew unhappy with the British after the war, leading to Pontiac's Rebellion from 1763 to 1766
Napoleon rose to power during the French Revolution. He had a successful early military career leading victories in Italy and Egypt. However, he was defeated in Egypt by the British navy. Returning to France as a hero, Napoleon launched a coup and became the First Consul, consolidating his power over time. He established himself as Emperor and expanded French control over much of Europe through military campaigns, while also instituting reforms like the Napoleonic Code. However, campaigns in Spain and Russia proved difficult and contributed to his eventual defeat.
Admiral Nelson and the Battle of TrafalgarPeter Hammond
The Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 was a decisive British naval victory over the combined French and Spanish fleets. Lord Nelson employed innovative tactics by breaking the enemy line and raking their ships with devastating broadsides from British ships manned by highly trained crews. Despite being outnumbered, the Royal Navy prevailed due to superior seamanship and gunnery. Nelson was fatally wounded during the battle but the decisive defeat ended Napoleon's plans to invade Britain and established British naval supremacy for the rest of the 19th century.
The document summarizes the key events that led to the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914. It discusses the rise of imperialism and nationalism in European powers in the late 19th century which increased tensions. It also describes the system of alliances between European countries and how the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand resulted in Austria-Hungary declaring war on Serbia and led Germany and their allies to join the war against Russia, France and their allies.
Napoleon Bonaparte rose through the ranks of the French military, gaining victories in Italy. This boosted his reputation and appeal as a strong leader to end turmoil in France. In 1799, Napoleon was named First Consul of the newly established French Consulate. As leader, he established order and stability through important compromises like the Concordat of 1801 with Catholic Church and Civil Code of 1804. However, he betrayed revolutionary ideals by restricting civil liberties. Napoleon's numerous military campaigns made France dominant in Europe, but this dominance was short-lived as the disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812 marked the beginning of his decline and eventual defeat at Waterloo in 1815.
1) Napoleon was a young artillery officer who gained fame for his role in liberating the port city of Toulon from British forces in 1793.
2) Over the next decade, through a series of victories over Austria and others, Napoleon rose to power in France becoming the First Consul in 1799 and later crowning himself Emperor in 1804.
3) Napoleon conquered much of Europe but his invasion of Russia in 1812 proved disastrous, contributing to his eventual defeat at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 and exile to Saint Helena, where he died in 1821.
US Navy in WW II; session iv; the struggle for the MedJim Powers
In many ways this battle is the turning point in the European Theater. The story is a real cliffhanger. I also use the visual material in my Annapolis textbook to demonstrate the interpretation of charts and graphs.
General Christiaan De Wet was a highly successful and respected Boer general during the Anglo-Boer War. He repeatedly outmaneuvered and evaded much larger British forces, becoming their most formidable enemy. Through his tactics of mobile warfare and ability to strike unexpectedly, he inflicted numerous defeats on the British and prolonged the war for over two years, despite being outnumbered. Even in defeat, De Wet was seen as a hero among the Boers for his leadership, perseverance, and refusal to surrender against overwhelming odds.
This document provides a summary of Napoleon Bonaparte's plan to secretly transport 60,000 troops across the Alps to surprise the Austrian forces in Italy. It describes the difficult terrain of the mountain passes and Napoleon's meticulous preparations, including collecting supplies, repair shops, and hospitals along the route. On May 7th, 1800, Napoleon departed Paris to begin the movement of troops across the Alps, hoping to descend into Italy and cut off the Austrians from reinforcements.
The document discusses the opposing naval strategies and command structures of Britain and Germany at the outbreak of World War 1. Britain had recently established a War Council to make strategic decisions, led by Prime Minister Asquith and including Churchill and Kitchener. Germany's naval command was fragmented without a clear strategic vision. Both nations entered the war with strong navies but lacked coordination in naval planning and operations. The lack of unified command and strategic thinking would hamper the effectiveness of both navies early in the war.
Napoleon Bonaparte rose to power in France during the French Revolution. He established himself as the Emperor of France and expanded French territory across Europe through military conquest. At the height of his power, Napoleon controlled a vast empire stretching from France to Russia. However, his invasion of Russia in 1812 proved disastrous and marked the beginning of his decline in power. After being defeated at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, Napoleon was exiled to St. Helena, where he died in 1821. His reign significantly influenced the development of nationalism and the modernization of legal codes across Europe.
Napoleon Bonaparte rose to power in France after proving himself as a military leader. In 1804 he crowned himself Emperor of France in a ceremony where he took the crown from the Pope, demonstrating his supremacy. As Emperor, Napoleon conquered much of Europe through decisive military victories. However, his failed invasion of Russia in 1812 marked the beginning of his decline in power. After being defeated by an international coalition, Napoleon was exiled to Elba in 1814, but briefly retook power in 1815 before his final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo.
Napoleon rose to power through his military successes against the First Coalition that opposed the French Revolution. As a general leading the French army in northern Italy, Napoleon achieved victory after victory against the Austrians through inventive tactics and discipline. This made him extremely popular in France and elevated his status and influence. Napoleon then seized power in France through the Coup of 18 Brumaire, which overthrew the French Directory government and established the French Consulate with Napoleon as First Consul, marking his rise to become the leader of France.
The last presentation for this part of the USN's rise to the leading maritime power. The period 1919-1945 was treated earlier in the posts titled USN in WW II. Next I plan to take the story from 1945.
The document discusses the 18th century European empires and their colonial ambitions. It describes how empires used mercantilism to promote their economic interests and gain control over trade. This led to increasing tensions and rivalry over colonies in North America and India between France and Britain. The Seven Years' War from 1756-1763 resulted in major territorial changes that strengthened Britain's hold on North America and India at the expense of France and Spain.
Napoleon rose to power through his military successes in Italy and Egypt in the late 18th century. After returning to France, he launched a coup in 1799 and became the First Consul. He later proclaimed himself Emperor in 1804. As leader, Napoleon reformed many French institutions, established the Napoleonic Code, and expanded French territory across Europe through military campaigns. However, his invasion of Russia in 1812 proved disastrous, leading to the collapse of his empire and his eventual exile on St. Helena, where he died in 1821.
The document summarizes transformations in 19th century Spain, focusing on the reigns of Carlos IV from 1788-1808 and Fernando VII from 1814-1833. It describes Spain allying with France under Carlos IV and the outbreak of the War of Independence in 1808 after French troops invaded. The Cortes of Cádiz established a liberal constitution in 1812, but Fernando VII restored absolutism and repression of liberals upon returning to power in 1814. Liberal forces briefly reinstated the 1812 constitution during the "Liberal Triennium" from 1820-1823.
The Estates-General of 1789 was the first meeting of the French Estates-General in over 150 years. Summoned by King Louis XVI to address France's financial problems, it represented the clergy, nobles, and commoners. Disagreements arose over voting procedures that favored the first two estates. In response, the Third Estate formed the National Assembly against the king's wishes, marking the start of the French Revolution.
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848Jim Powers
Beginning with the Vienna settlement, 1814-15, we follow the efforts of the Concert of Europe to preserve the peace and prevent revolutionary disturbances.
This document contains a summary of key concepts in organizational behavior and management. It discusses topics like organizational behavior as a field focused on understanding group and individual behavior in organizations. It also covers scientific methods for linking causes and outcomes, the three levels of cultural analysis in organizations, and how managers can modify visible aspects of culture. Additional topics summarized include the nature of managerial work, ethics and morality distinctions, characteristics of high-performance teams, conflict management styles, motivation theories, stress and burnout, and power and authority in organizations.
Admiral Nelson and the Battle of TrafalgarPeter Hammond
The Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 was a decisive British naval victory over the combined French and Spanish fleets. Lord Nelson employed innovative tactics by breaking the enemy line and raking their ships with devastating broadsides from British ships manned by highly trained crews. Despite being outnumbered, the Royal Navy prevailed due to superior seamanship and gunnery. Nelson was fatally wounded during the battle but the decisive defeat ended Napoleon's plans to invade Britain and established British naval supremacy for the rest of the 19th century.
The document summarizes the key events that led to the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914. It discusses the rise of imperialism and nationalism in European powers in the late 19th century which increased tensions. It also describes the system of alliances between European countries and how the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand resulted in Austria-Hungary declaring war on Serbia and led Germany and their allies to join the war against Russia, France and their allies.
Napoleon Bonaparte rose through the ranks of the French military, gaining victories in Italy. This boosted his reputation and appeal as a strong leader to end turmoil in France. In 1799, Napoleon was named First Consul of the newly established French Consulate. As leader, he established order and stability through important compromises like the Concordat of 1801 with Catholic Church and Civil Code of 1804. However, he betrayed revolutionary ideals by restricting civil liberties. Napoleon's numerous military campaigns made France dominant in Europe, but this dominance was short-lived as the disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812 marked the beginning of his decline and eventual defeat at Waterloo in 1815.
1) Napoleon was a young artillery officer who gained fame for his role in liberating the port city of Toulon from British forces in 1793.
2) Over the next decade, through a series of victories over Austria and others, Napoleon rose to power in France becoming the First Consul in 1799 and later crowning himself Emperor in 1804.
3) Napoleon conquered much of Europe but his invasion of Russia in 1812 proved disastrous, contributing to his eventual defeat at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 and exile to Saint Helena, where he died in 1821.
US Navy in WW II; session iv; the struggle for the MedJim Powers
In many ways this battle is the turning point in the European Theater. The story is a real cliffhanger. I also use the visual material in my Annapolis textbook to demonstrate the interpretation of charts and graphs.
General Christiaan De Wet was a highly successful and respected Boer general during the Anglo-Boer War. He repeatedly outmaneuvered and evaded much larger British forces, becoming their most formidable enemy. Through his tactics of mobile warfare and ability to strike unexpectedly, he inflicted numerous defeats on the British and prolonged the war for over two years, despite being outnumbered. Even in defeat, De Wet was seen as a hero among the Boers for his leadership, perseverance, and refusal to surrender against overwhelming odds.
This document provides a summary of Napoleon Bonaparte's plan to secretly transport 60,000 troops across the Alps to surprise the Austrian forces in Italy. It describes the difficult terrain of the mountain passes and Napoleon's meticulous preparations, including collecting supplies, repair shops, and hospitals along the route. On May 7th, 1800, Napoleon departed Paris to begin the movement of troops across the Alps, hoping to descend into Italy and cut off the Austrians from reinforcements.
The document discusses the opposing naval strategies and command structures of Britain and Germany at the outbreak of World War 1. Britain had recently established a War Council to make strategic decisions, led by Prime Minister Asquith and including Churchill and Kitchener. Germany's naval command was fragmented without a clear strategic vision. Both nations entered the war with strong navies but lacked coordination in naval planning and operations. The lack of unified command and strategic thinking would hamper the effectiveness of both navies early in the war.
Napoleon Bonaparte rose to power in France during the French Revolution. He established himself as the Emperor of France and expanded French territory across Europe through military conquest. At the height of his power, Napoleon controlled a vast empire stretching from France to Russia. However, his invasion of Russia in 1812 proved disastrous and marked the beginning of his decline in power. After being defeated at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, Napoleon was exiled to St. Helena, where he died in 1821. His reign significantly influenced the development of nationalism and the modernization of legal codes across Europe.
Napoleon Bonaparte rose to power in France after proving himself as a military leader. In 1804 he crowned himself Emperor of France in a ceremony where he took the crown from the Pope, demonstrating his supremacy. As Emperor, Napoleon conquered much of Europe through decisive military victories. However, his failed invasion of Russia in 1812 marked the beginning of his decline in power. After being defeated by an international coalition, Napoleon was exiled to Elba in 1814, but briefly retook power in 1815 before his final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo.
Napoleon rose to power through his military successes against the First Coalition that opposed the French Revolution. As a general leading the French army in northern Italy, Napoleon achieved victory after victory against the Austrians through inventive tactics and discipline. This made him extremely popular in France and elevated his status and influence. Napoleon then seized power in France through the Coup of 18 Brumaire, which overthrew the French Directory government and established the French Consulate with Napoleon as First Consul, marking his rise to become the leader of France.
The last presentation for this part of the USN's rise to the leading maritime power. The period 1919-1945 was treated earlier in the posts titled USN in WW II. Next I plan to take the story from 1945.
The document discusses the 18th century European empires and their colonial ambitions. It describes how empires used mercantilism to promote their economic interests and gain control over trade. This led to increasing tensions and rivalry over colonies in North America and India between France and Britain. The Seven Years' War from 1756-1763 resulted in major territorial changes that strengthened Britain's hold on North America and India at the expense of France and Spain.
Napoleon rose to power through his military successes in Italy and Egypt in the late 18th century. After returning to France, he launched a coup in 1799 and became the First Consul. He later proclaimed himself Emperor in 1804. As leader, Napoleon reformed many French institutions, established the Napoleonic Code, and expanded French territory across Europe through military campaigns. However, his invasion of Russia in 1812 proved disastrous, leading to the collapse of his empire and his eventual exile on St. Helena, where he died in 1821.
The document summarizes transformations in 19th century Spain, focusing on the reigns of Carlos IV from 1788-1808 and Fernando VII from 1814-1833. It describes Spain allying with France under Carlos IV and the outbreak of the War of Independence in 1808 after French troops invaded. The Cortes of Cádiz established a liberal constitution in 1812, but Fernando VII restored absolutism and repression of liberals upon returning to power in 1814. Liberal forces briefly reinstated the 1812 constitution during the "Liberal Triennium" from 1820-1823.
The Estates-General of 1789 was the first meeting of the French Estates-General in over 150 years. Summoned by King Louis XVI to address France's financial problems, it represented the clergy, nobles, and commoners. Disagreements arose over voting procedures that favored the first two estates. In response, the Third Estate formed the National Assembly against the king's wishes, marking the start of the French Revolution.
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848Jim Powers
Beginning with the Vienna settlement, 1814-15, we follow the efforts of the Concert of Europe to preserve the peace and prevent revolutionary disturbances.
This document contains a summary of key concepts in organizational behavior and management. It discusses topics like organizational behavior as a field focused on understanding group and individual behavior in organizations. It also covers scientific methods for linking causes and outcomes, the three levels of cultural analysis in organizations, and how managers can modify visible aspects of culture. Additional topics summarized include the nature of managerial work, ethics and morality distinctions, characteristics of high-performance teams, conflict management styles, motivation theories, stress and burnout, and power and authority in organizations.
1. The document is a lesson plan for an English class discussing favorite musicians and singers.
2. The lesson aims to review vocabulary about music, develop students' argumentation skills, and practice using clauses of time and condition to express future actions.
3. The plan includes warming up students with a guessing game about music terms, reviewing homework, practicing target grammar through exercises and group work, listening to and discussing music pieces, reading a text to inspire composition, and having students prepare and present stories about their favorite singers.
La marcha desde Zamora, Ecuador busca proteger los territorios indígenas y campesinos de la destrucción causada por las mineras. Los pueblos indígenas y campesinos comenzarán una larga caminata desde Zamora hasta Quito para exigir que sus territorios no sean destruidos por las mineras chinas y canadienses. La minería afecta negativamente las fuentes de agua, los suelos agrícolas y los bosques.
This training certificate was presented to Maurice Dixon for successfully completing a course in Raiser's Edge database administration on Tuesday, October 20, 2015. The certificate was issued on October 21, 2015 and signed by Terry Vyas, the General Manager of Educational Services.
http://remax-valencia-ca-paris911.com/the-8-x-cop-rules-of-a-safe-open-house/ How are you having your open houses conducted. Make sure you search for them all at http://SantaClaritaOpenHouses.com to see which ones are being held open and why you should care. I'm Connor MacIvor with REMAX and looking forward to being of great service.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like depression and anxiety.
The document provides a historical overview of several important religious buildings in Iasi, Romania. It describes Saint Nicolas Church, founded in 1491 by Stephen the Great, which later housed a printing press and school. It also outlines the architectural and cultural significance of Galata Church, Three Hierarchs Church, Golia Church and Monastery, and the Metropolitan Cathedral. These churches and monasteries played important roles in Moldavian history and culture over centuries.
O documento propõe a implementação de uma Sala de Situação para a Gestão Pública, estruturada em três fases e com o objetivo de subsidiar processos de planejamento, tomada de decisão e integração entre objetivos e órgãos governamentais por meio do monitoramento de políticas, processos e projetos.
Suporte visual da apresentação descrevendo a aplicação da metodologia METRICS para a definição dos principais fatores que influenciam a Experiência do Cliente, a arquitetura de um Centro de Controle e Comando da Experiência do Cliente e o seu processo de operação, realizada no evento DMC LATAM 2014.
Este documento describe los tipos y usos de los blogs en la educación. Explica que los blogs pueden ser usados por profesores para mantener a los estudiantes actualizados sobre el material y reflexiones del curso, y también pueden ser usados por estudiantes como portafolios para mostrar sus proyectos y progreso a lo largo del tiempo. Además, discute brevemente las tecnologías clave como etiquetas y feeds que permiten la comunicación y expansión de los blogs.
Розвантаження та оновлення програм початкової школи.Якість Освіти
Шкільні програми початкової школи розвантажені з 13 предметів. У цих програмах знято фіксовану кількість годин на вивчення кожної теми, вчитель самостійно їх визначає, а також дублювання змісту у навчальних предметах «Основи здоровʼя», «Я у світі», «Природознавство». Ключовими змінами також є те, що процес навчання приведено у відповідність до вікових можливостеймолодших школярів, а термінологію програм уніфіковано.
The Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 was a decisive British naval victory over the combined French and Spanish fleets. Lord Nelson employed innovative tactics by breaking the enemy line of battle and raking their ships with devastating broadsides from his own ships. Despite being outnumbered, Nelson's well-trained crews defeated the enemy, securing British naval supremacy for the rest of the century. This victory prevented Napoleon's planned invasion of Britain and allowed British trade to flourish globally, establishing Britain as an economic superpower.
The Battle of Trafalgar was a decisive naval victory for the British Royal Navy over the combined fleets of the French Navy and Spanish Navy on October 21, 1805 off the coast of Cape Trafalgar in Spain. The battle resulted in a loss of 22 ships for the Franco-Spanish fleet without any British ships lost. British Admiral Lord Nelson aboard HMS Victory led the British fleet to victory over the 33 French and Spanish ships of the line commanded by French Admiral Pierre-Charles Villeneuve. Nelson was fatally wounded during the battle, but the Royal Navy was able to defeat the enemy fleet within three hours, securing British naval supremacy for the remainder of the Napoleonic Wars.
Britain emerged from the Napoleonic Wars as the dominant global power, with colonies and bases around the world supporting its naval power and trade dominance. Its empire expanded significantly in this period, most notably in India, where the British East India Company gained control of large territories and became a powerful political entity, transitioning control of India to the British government over time. By 1815 Britain had established colonies in Australia, the Caribbean, southern Africa, and was firmly in control of India and Canada, marking the rise of its "Second Empire" as compensation for the recent loss of the American colonies.
We Shall Fight on the Beaches June 4, 1940House of C.docxcelenarouzie
We Shall Fight on the Beaches
June 4, 1940
House of Commons
The position of the B. E.F had now become critical As a result of a most skillfully conducted retreat and German errors, the bulk of the British Forces reached the Dunkirk bridgehead. The peril facing the British nation was now suddenly and universally perceived. On May 26, "Operation Dynamo "--the evacuation from Dunkirk began. The seas remained absolutely calm. The Royal Air Force--bitterly maligned at the time by the Army--fought vehemently to deny the enemy the total air supremacy which would have wrecked the operation. At the outset, it was hoped that 45,000 men might be evacuated; in the event, over 338,000 Allied troops reached England, including 26,000 French soldiers. On June 4, Churchill reported to the House of Commons, seeking to check the mood of national euphoria and relief at the unexpected deliverance, and to make a clear appeal to the United States.
From the moment that the French defenses at Sedan and on the Meuse were broken at the end of the second week of May, only a rapid retreat to Amiens and the south could have saved the British and French Armies who had entered Belgium at the appeal of the Belgian King; but this strategic fact was not immediately realized. The French High Command hoped they would be able to close the gap, and the Armies of the north were under their orders. Moreover, a retirement of this kind would have involved almost certainly the destruction of the fine Belgian Army of over 20 divisions and the abandonment of the whole of Belgium. Therefore, when the force and scope of the German penetration were realized and when a new French Generalissimo, General Weygand, assumed command in place of General Gamelin, an effort was made by the French and British Armies in Belgium to keep on holding the right hand of the Belgians and to give their own right hand to a newly created French Army which was to have advanced across the Somme in great strength to grasp it.
However, the German eruption swept like a sharp scythe around the right and rear of the Armies of the north. Eight or nine armored divisions, each of about four hundred armored vehicles of different kinds, but carefully assorted to be complementary and divisible into small self-contained units, cut off all communications between us and the main French Armies. It severed our own communications for food and ammunition, which ran first to Amiens and afterwards through Abbeville, and it shore its way up the coast to Boulogne and Calais, and almost to Dunkirk. Behind this armored and mechanized onslaught came a number of German divisions in lorries, and behind them again there plodded comparatively slowly the dull brute mass of the ordinary German Army and German people, always so ready to be led to the trampling down in other lands of liberties and comforts which they have never known in their own.
I have said this armored scythe-stroke almost reached Dunkirk-almost but not quite. Boulogne a.
The document provides background information on the main powers in Europe prior to World War 1, including Britain, France, Russia, Austria-Hungary and Germany. It describes their overseas empires, political situations, alliances and rivalries. It then outlines some of the key events that increased tensions between the powers and ultimately led to the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914.
Gallipoli is a significant site in Australian and New Zealand history that is commemorated annually on Anzac Day. In 1915, Allied forces including Australian and New Zealand troops attempted to capture the Gallipoli Peninsula in order to control the Dardanelles Strait and open a route to attack Istanbul. However, the campaign was a failure due to underestimating Turkish resistance, poor planning and execution by British commanders. Over 8,000 Australian and New Zealand troops were killed during the eight-month campaign, giving rise to the nations' identity and sense of mateship. While both sides suffered heavy casualties, the Allied forces were ultimately forced to withdraw in defeat, cementing Gallipoli's place as a symbol of
Gallipoli is a significant site in Australian and New Zealand history that is commemorated annually on Anzac Day. In 1915, Allied forces including Australian and New Zealand troops attempted to capture the Gallipoli Peninsula in order to control the Dardanelles Strait and open a route to attack Istanbul. However, the campaign was a failure due to underestimating Turkish resistance, poor planning and execution by British commanders. Over 8,000 Australian and New Zealand troops were killed during the eight-month campaign, giving rise to the nations' identity and traditions of ANZAC spirit and mateship. A century later, Gallipoli remains an important site of remembrance and pilgrimage for Australians and New Zealand
The document discusses naval warfare during World War 1, which took place globally in every ocean. It describes early German raider successes like the SMS Emden in the Indian Ocean. It also discusses major battles like Germany's defeat of British cruisers off Chile and Britain's subsequent victory over Germany at the Falkland Islands. The blockade strategies of both sides are outlined, as well as the large naval encounter at the Battle of Jutland. Germany turned to submarine warfare with U-boats, launching an unrestricted campaign in 1917 against merchant ships from any nation. New convoy tactics and technology like depth charges helped turn the tide for the Allies. Naval losses were enormous, with over 57,000 British and Commonwealth casualties
The Age of the Democratic Revolution, R.R. Palmer's phrase, begins with the British North American colonies in the 1760s. This session will take the story from origins to the first turning point, the Battle of Saratoga, 1777.
The document provides an overview of Georgian Britain from the early 18th century to the early 19th century. It discusses key events and developments, including:
1) The rule of the first three King Georges and the rise of Robert Walpole as the first Prime Minister.
2) Scientific and technological advances during this period, including discoveries in chemistry and the emergence of the Industrial Revolution.
3) Britain's increasing global power through territorial expansion and military victories over France during the Napoleonic Wars.
The document discusses the French capture of Minorca during the Seven Years' War. It describes how the French assembled ships and troops at Toulon to launch a diversionary attack on Minorca that became their main operation. The French landed on Minorca in mid-April 1756 and drove the British garrison into the fort at Port Mahon. The British sent Admiral Byng with ships to relieve Minorca, but his instructions were complicated by other potential contingencies. The French were ultimately able to take control of Minorca from the British.
1 Winston Churchill (1874-1965) Speech 4 June 1940,.docxcroftsshanon
1
Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Speech 4 June 1940, House of Commons
From the moment that the French defenses at Sedan and on the Meuse were broken at the end of
the second week of May, only a rapid retreat to Amiens and the south could have saved the British
and French Armies who had entered Belgium at the appeal of the Belgian King; but this strategic
fact was not immediately realized. …
However, the German eruption swept like a sharp scythe around the right and rear of the Armies
of the north. Eight or nine armored divisions, each of about four hundred armored vehicles of
different kinds, but carefully assorted to be complementary and divisible into small self-contained
units, cut off all communications between us and the main French Armies. It severed our own
communications for food and ammunition, which ran first to Amiens and afterwards through
Abbeville, and it shore its way up the coast to Boulogne and Calais, and almost to Dunkirk. Behind
this armored and mechanized onslaught came a number of German divisions in lorries, and behind
them again there plodded comparatively slowly the dull brute mass of the ordinary German Army
and German people, always so ready to be led to the trampling down in other lands of liberties and
comforts which they have never known in their own.
…Thus it was that the port of Dunkirk was kept open. When it was found impossible for the Armies
of the north to reopen their communications to Amiens with the main French Armies, only one
choice remained. It seemed, indeed, forlorn. The Belgian, British and French Armies were almost
surrounded. Their sole line of retreat was to a single port and to its neighboring beaches. They
were pressed on every side by heavy attacks and far outnumbered in the air.
….The enemy attacked on all sides with great strength and fierceness, and their main power, the
power of their far more numerous Air Force, was thrown into the battle or else concentrated upon
Dunkirk and the beaches. Pressing in upon the narrow exit, both from the east and from the west,
the enemy began to fire with cannon upon the beaches by which alone the shipping could approach
or depart. They sowed magnetic mines in the channels and seas; they sent repeated waves of hostile
aircraft, sometimes more than a hundred strong in one formation, to cast their bombs upon the
single pier that remained, and upon the sand dunes upon which the troops had their eyes for shelter.
Their U-boats, one of which was sunk, and their motor launches took their toll of the vast traffic
which now began. For four or five days an intense struggle reigned. All their armored divisions-
or what Was left of them-together with great masses of infantry and artillery, hurled themselves in
vain upon the ever-narrowing, ever-contracting appendix within which the British and French
Armies fought.
Meanwhile, the Royal Navy, with the willing help of countless merchant seamen, strain.
Introducing the second series on the growth of the US Navy, post-Civil War. This is an introduction to the second half of the 19th century when Britain still ruled the waves. The focus is on Imperialism.
The document summarizes the origins and key events of the Anglo-Dutch wars between England and the Netherlands in the 17th century over control of global trade. It describes how England built a powerful navy after its civil wars to challenge Dutch maritime dominance. The first Anglo-Dutch war began in 1652 after England passed the Navigation Acts to restrict Dutch shipping and trade. The initial naval battles were inconclusive, but revealed weaknesses in the Dutch fleet compared to the larger, more powerful English warships. The wars established England as the dominant naval power and allowed it to displace the Dutch in global commerce.
The document discusses the United Irishmen rebellion from the late 18th century. It summarizes the key events leading up to the rebellion including the American and French Revolutions. It then describes the two failed French invasions of Ireland in 1796 and 1798 aimed at supporting the United Irishmen. Both attempts resulted in battles between the French and British navies in Bantry Bay, Ireland. The document concludes by noting that rebellions often occur in response to tyrannical powers.
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General ObservationsJim Powers
The introduction to this twenty-two part series on nineteenth century Europe, 1815-1914. It also describes the college textbook which I have chosen to illustrate and annotate.
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...Jim Powers
This document summarizes political developments in Eastern Europe from 1815-1848, focusing on Russia, Prussia, and Austria. It describes how absolutism dominated these states and led to repression of revolutionary and liberal ideas. In Russia, Tsar Alexander I initially promised reforms but failed to deliver, and repression increased under Nicholas I and his minister Arakcheyev. Serfdom remained the dominant economic system, stifling development and leading to peasant revolts. Absolutism sought to maintain control and resist new ideas, as philosophers like de Maistre argued, but change was occurring beneath the surface that would challenge this control.
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July MonarchyJim Powers
This document provides an overview of the economic and social organization of France following the Napoleonic era. It discusses how the French Revolution permanently changed France by abolishing the feudal system and creating a more centralized state. Economically, France modernized its agriculture and industries like textiles expanded, while socially the nobility's power declined and the middle class rose politically. The majority of French people remained rural farmers or urban workers who faced difficult living and working conditions.
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromiseJim Powers
This document provides an overview of economic and social conditions in Great Britain following the Napoleonic Wars from 1815 to 1848. It describes the postwar economic depression, the enclosure movement that displaced many rural workers, rising social unrest and violence between 1815-1819 due to high unemployment and poverty. It also discusses the conservative government under Lord Liverpool that took a repressive approach to dealing with unrest rather than reform, and moderate reformers like William Cobbett who advocated for making parliament more representative through legal means.
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General ObservationsJim Powers
Between 1850-1871, industrial production in Europe saw unprecedented growth. The application of machinery to coal mining doubled French coal production and tripled Germany's in ten years. This drove growth in metallurgy, with the introduction of the Bessemer and Siemens-Martin processes doubling European iron and steel production by 1860. Transportation was also revolutionized through new technologies like screw propellers and compound engines, as well as infrastructure projects like the Suez Canal. Overall, this period saw Europe in the midst of the Industrial Revolution and rapid economic expansion.
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean warJim Powers
The document summarizes the breakdown of the Concert of Europe and the causes of the Crimean War in the 19th century. It discusses how the revolutions of 1848 weakened the Concert by introducing a new generation of statesmen who were less inclined to restraint and compromise in diplomacy. The Crimean War was briefly fought from 1853 to 1856 between Russia on one side, and an alliance of France, Britain, the Ottoman Empire and Sardinia on the other. The war resulted from Russia's ambitions to gain territories from the declining Ottoman Empire, and was one of the final conflicts of the Concert system of international relations established after the Napoleonic Wars.
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66Jim Powers
Now we look at the question which had faced Germans since the great upheaval of 1848, should Germany be unified with or without the Austrian Empire. It will be decided in the Seven Weeks War.
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871Jim Powers
We conclude Part Two of this mid-century survey with Great Britain from Palmerston to Gladstone, Russia under Alexander II, and the showdown between France and Germany.
19 c Europe, Part 3; General ObservationsJim Powers
The document discusses several key developments in 19th century Europe from 1871-1914. It notes that liberalism, which was ascendant in the 1870s, was in retreat by the end of the period as new intellectual tendencies emphasized irrational factors in human behavior. Economic trends also weakened liberal parties and philosophy. New problems from population growth, urbanization, and unemployment crises emerged without a shared faith that reason could solve them, increasing the potential for domestic conflict and international insecurity during this era.
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic Jim Powers
The French Republic from humiliating defeat, the Paris Commune, and the end of royalism to republican success and three crises, to the coming of the Great War.
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second ReichJim Powers
The document discusses the political structure and development of Germany from 1871 to 1914. It describes how Germany under Bismarck and Wilhelm II had a pseudo-constitutional system where parliamentary processes existed but real power was held by unelected authorities. Under Bismarck from 1871-1890, political parties emerged but had limited power. Wilhelm II's rule from 1890-1914 saw economic growth but a turn toward absolutism that failed to adapt to rising democratic ideals in Europe. This pseudo-constitutional system ultimately contributed to Germany's defeat in World War I.
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and TurkeyJim Powers
The document discusses political and social developments in Central and Southeast Europe from 1871-1914. It focuses on the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary, describing the rise of nationalist parties in both the Austrian and Hungarian parts. It also examines the Balkan states of Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece, and the declining Ottoman Empire's role in the Balkans. Key figures and events discussed include the Christian Social Party in Austria, Zionism founder Theodor Herzl, and tensions between Austria-Hungary and the Balkan states that contributed to World War I.
The document discusses economic conditions in Imperial Russia between 1871-1914. It notes that while industry grew during this period, led by the textile and metallurgical industries supporting railway expansion, it did not grow enough to relieve pressure from agricultural overpopulation. Agriculture continued to struggle with low yields due to outdated practices, lack of credit, and the continuation of the commune system. Efforts at reform were sporadic and aimed more at relieving misery temporarily rather than enacting fundamental change, for fear of alienating the landed classes. The condition of the peasantry continued to be one of deepening poverty.
The document discusses the Jameson Raid of 29 December 1895 to 2 January 1896 in South Africa. It provides context about conflicts between British capitalists and Boers in the 1870s following the discovery of diamonds. It notes that Gladstone's government recognized the independence of the Transvaal following the First Boer War in 1884, though a gold rush occurred there two years later, exacerbating tensions. The Jameson Raid itself saw British forces invade the Transvaal in an attempt to overthrow the Boer government.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
3. Churchill remarked in his 1942 speech following the Second Battle of El Alamein:
‘The Germans have received back again that measure of fire and steel which they
have so often meted out to others. Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning
of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.’
Just so, Trafalgar didn’t end the Franco-Spanish threat at sea. But it certainly was a
bright ray of hope in a year of heightened fear of French invasion and her invincibility
in the land war on the Continent. ‘Boney’ will continue to threaten maritime action
and the long blockade will still require great sacrifice.
But Nelson’s shining victory, burnished by his death, like Wolfe before Quebec in
1759, will continue to inspire the British people to this day.
jbp
The End of the Beginning
4. In Birmingham, the [Trafalgar Day] anniversary is
celebrated by a ceremony at the statue of Lord Nelson in
the Bull Ring.• The statue is the oldest statue [1809] to
Lord Nelson in the United Kingdom. The ceremony is led
by the Lord Mayor of Birmingham and involves men and
women of HMS Forward, Sea Cadet Units from across the
West Midlands and various civic organizations including
The Nelson Society and The Birmingham Civic Society.
Afterwards there is a wreath laying by naval and civic
organizations and a parade marches off to Victoria
Square, the public square in front of the seat of local
government, where the Lord Mayor takes the salute.—
Wikipedia
6. If blood be the price of admiralty,
Lord God, we ha' paid in full!
Rudyard Kipling, “Song of the Dead”
The Admiralty Arch, looking from Trafalgar Square toward Buckingham Palace
7. “NELSON’S COMMAND of the Med squadron from Jul 1803 to Aug 1805 was as
extraordinary as his achievements in battle. Lacking a suitable base from which to
watch Toulon…he remained at sea, never putting into port or setting foot ashore himself
until the end of the period, sheltering for provisioning and making what repairs could be
made in open roadsteads, chiefly on the coast of Sardinia. His favorite anchorage was in
the Maddalena Islands off the NE coast of Sardinia….
Peter Padfield, Maritime Power and the Struggle for Freedom.(2006), p. 217.
10
Trafalgar, 1805
8. “…of Sardinia.
“He made his summer station and rendezvous in the Gulf of Lion 30 to 40 miles W of
Toulon,• sufficiently far, he hoped, to entice the French out, yet in a position to prevent a
Spanish squadron joining them.• He was very aware of the importance of keeping the
French from Egypt, Sicily and Naples, and, for his own purposes, Sardinia, and ensuring
the safe convoying of British merchantmen and supply ships throughout the Med and past
Gib as far as Cadiz, but his prime object, as he put it, was ‘to keep the French fleet in
check, and if they ever put out to sea, to have force enough to annihilate them…’”
Peter Padfield, Maritime Power and the Struggle for Freedom.(2006), p. 217..
10
Trafalgar, 1805
9. “… annihilate them. Annihilation was a curious concept for an officer brought up in the
eighteenth century; it id doubtful if any other fleet commander in any navy thought in this
way, let alone, formulated the idea, but Nelson meant it, and was to repeat it constantly. It
sprang from his deep hatred of the French, intense patriotism and craving for personal glory
—and a realistic appraisal of the weakness of his enemy. He knew it was possible. He had
proved it at the Nile, the first true naval annihilation. As the eminent nineteenth-century
French admiral and naval historian, Jean-Baptiste Jurien de la Gravière, summed it up
later,’Le genie de Nelson c’est d’avoir compris notre faiblesse.’ [Nelson’s genius was to
understand our weakness completely].”
Padfield, Maritime Power, pp. 217-218..
10
Trafalgar, 1805
10. I. Peace Ruptured
II. The Third Coalition
III. Bonaparte’s Grand Design
IV. The Crisis
V. The Battle of Trafalgar
12. “Englishmen rejoiced at the treaty signed in Amiens in the spring of 1802, ending the nine-
year-old war with France.• Prime Minister Henry Addington was hailed as the peacemaker….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Sea Power, p. 149.
13. “…the peacemaker. Seamen again pursued their trade without fear of the press gang or French
privateers, and Englishmen for the first time in over a decade resumed acquaintance with the
divertissements of Paris. To win this peace, England had to pay, but the price seemed reasonable.
To prove their good faith and desire for everlasting peace, Addington’s negotiators had ceded all
overseas conquests except Ceylon and Trinidad. Thus Spain regained Minorca; Holland, the
Cape Colony, the Spice Islands, Malacca, Demerera, and Berbice. Egypt was to be returned to
Turkey, and Malta to the Knights of St. John. To France the treaty restored her WI, African, and
Indian colonies. In return for all this,• the First Consul promised the status quo in Europe.
“Confident that Napoleon had been appeased, the English disarmed in haste. The income tax
law was the first to go. The navy was reduced from over 100 ships of the line to not quite 40.
Over 40,000 experienced seamen were paid off, and half-pay officers by the hundred vied for the
few vacancies in the peacetime fleet….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Sea Power, p. 149.
14. “…peacetime fleet. Army cuts were as vigorous as those inflicted on the navy.
“Visitors to France proclaimed themselves charmed by the fine, handsome, statesmanlike
First Consul. The caricatured “Boney”disappeared from men’s ken; in his place appeared Consul
Bonaparte, suave, Byronic, brooding, good humored, and intelligent. He deliberately set out to
captivate the visiting English by a grand whirl of balls, reviews, and Te Deums. These were
followed by more than a hint offings to come, foreshadows of imperial grandeur—levées, and
his habit of calling himself by his first name alone: Napoleon.”
Ibid.
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
15. “…alone: Napoleon.
“Only briefly were the English deceived. They had disarmed; Napoleon had not. His
shipyards hummed with activity. He had planned to build 25 ships of the line a year. In a few
years, with two hundred of the line, he could laugh at England’s domination of the sea….”
Ibid.
The Rupture of the
Peace of Amiens
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
16. “…the sea. He had signed a treaty to accomplish by peace what he had been unable to win at
war, for he had been unable to break the British stranglehold on his overseas lines of supply.
With his new ships he need no longer fear the crushing blockade of the RN. All he needed was
time. Had Napoleon been content to wait, it is possible that England would have become so
entrenched in the ways of peace that it would have been difficult for her to meet the vastly
greater challenge that Napoleon was preparing. But Napoleon was a vain man. For various
reasons insulting stories and caricatures began appearing in the British papers [print shops].
These infuriated Napoleon and he was even more enraged to learn that the British government
could do nothing about them To him it seemed ‘would not’ for he could not conceive of a free
press….”
Ibid.
The Rupture of the
Peace of Amiens
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
17.
18.
19.
20. “…free press.
“Vastly more important to the British, Napoleon promptly began to violate the terms of the
Treaty of Amiens. The only concession he had given was to promise to respect territorial
boundaries in Europe and overseas. Yet even before the treaty had been signed, he had sent a
force to the WI, ostensibly to put down a rising of the Negroes in Haiti, but actually to claim
Louisiana under provisions of a secret treaty with Spain. In Europe he took the bloodless
offensive, becoming President of what he called the Republic of Italy. To secure the
independence of Italy, Britain had yielded Porto Ferraro and Minorca and agreed to evacuate
Egypt and Malta. During the autumn, Piedmont, Parma, and the Canton of Valois became a part
the dominions of the Corsican. French troops remained in Holland in spite of his promise, and
agents there stirred disaffection against the British.
“Britain at first made no protest. Emboldened, Napoleon set his designs on Switzerland, and
taking as an excuse violence that his own agents stirred up in the Cantons, he decided he was
under no further obligations to respect the territorial integrity of the Swiss….”
op. cit,, pp. 149-150.
21. “…the Swiss. Ordering General Ney to invade, he called upon the Helvetic Republic to submit.
The Swiss promptly turned to England for assistance,• Well-meaning but weak-willed, the
Addington Government sent a remonstrance to Paris claiming the right of the Swiss to settle
their affairs ‘without the intervention of any foreign Powers.’ The only result of this note was to
drive Napoleon to further exertions for the conquest of Switzerland. Realizing that the RN could
not help them, and receiving no support from continental powers, the Swiss submitted….”
op. cit,, p. 150.
22. “…Swiss submitted.
“England’s vain espousal of the Swiss cause cast grave doubts on Addington’s policy of
‘Peace and Plenty.’• Men who, a few months before, tired of the ‘confounded men of genius’ of
Pitt’s party, had eagerly welcomed Addington’s cabinet of nonentities, now seriously questioned
his ability to preserve the peace he had bought with ‘unnecessary and degrading
concessions.’ [remind you of anybody?] As Napoleon hastened from one outrage to another,
thoughts of Englishmen turned to Pitt,• now almost retired from politics. ‘Whether Pitt will save
us, I do not know:’ wrote George Canning,• ‘but surely he is the only man that can.’….”
op. cit,, p. 150.
23.
24. “…that can.’ Pitt however had promised loyalty to Addington’s ministry, and he intended to
keep his promise. He refused to allow a coalition plot to unseat the PM.• But enough of the
background rumblings reached Addington, so that, faced with new ominous intelligence of
Napoleon’s activity, he was forced to stiffen his position. New instructions went to Lord
Whitworth, Ambassador in Paris, that henceforth Britain would insist on her right to intervene in
the affairs of the Continent. At the same time Whitworth hinted at reparations for breaches of the
status quo already committed by France.•
“These representations could not have come as a surprise to Napoleon, for he had always
known that a point would be reached where the British government would be forced to take a
stand. Even so, the timing was awkward. He had not had sufficient time to fill his storehouses
depleted by years of blockade, and his ambitious naval building program was barely underway.
His effective ships were mostly in the Caribbean dealing with the Haitian revolt,• and troops
which had sailed with them had succumbed in huge numbers to yellow fever [including
Napoleon’s brother-in-law, commanding general Charles Leclerc]….”
Ibid.
25.
26. “…yellow fever.
“To play for time, Napoleon turned to the counter-offensive demanding the British evacuation
of Egypt and Malta under the terms of Amiens. The British made no objections over Egypt, but
over Malta, Napoleon encountered the traditional British bulldog tenacity. To evacuate Malta
while the French had violated every provision for which the British had agreed to yield the
island was impossible. Until Britain had received guarantees from other continental powers that
Malta would be independent, the British garrison would remain.
“The inhospitable island was of no possible value to Napoleon except to deny its use to the
British, to whom it was of inestimable worth as a base. So long as England had to maintain a
fleet in the Med, she needed a base nearer to the scene of action than Gib. Minorca, a possible
alternate, had already been given up. No government faced with gathering war clouds could
agree to evacuate the island that gave them the means to command the Med. In a stormy
interview with Lord Whitworth, Napoleon threatened war, gibing at the division of English
politics….” Ibid.
27.
28. “…English politics. Nothing could have been more calculated to unite the British. While
Whitworth played the game out to the last, the British began to rearm. On 16 May 1803, Britain
declared war.
“The Addington ministry had no plans for the strategic direction of the war. It had come to
power to conclude a peace, and when events again forced war, the program collapsed. Yet there
was one thing that any British Cabinet would do almost automatically; it issued orders to the
Navy to re-establish the blockade of French ports. Upon the declaration of war, five of the line
sailed from Tor Bay under veteran VAdm Sir William Cornwallis.• Three days later they
appeared at their old station off Ushant. Also on the 16th,• Keith hoisted his flag at the Nore, and
that same evening Nelson boarded the Victory at Portsmouth and was quickly away to take
command of the Med station.”
op. cit,, pp. 150-151.
30. “At the resumption of war, Napoleon found himself in a difficult position. On land he was as
formidable as ever, but at sea his evasions of the Treaty had left him badly over-extended. In
addition to his fever-racked army at Haiti, there were more than 50 French ships in the
Caribbean and others scattered over the oceans of the world. His ships in port were few, ill-kept,
ill-found, and manned by ill-disciplined and untrained crews. When, on the 18th, the British
captured two ships at sea, Napoleon ordered the imprisonment of all British civilians caught in
France by the sudden outbreak of hostilities. He closed the Continent to British ships, including
the free towns of Hamburg and Bremen, recently overrun by his troops. Yet nothing but invasion
could satisfy the First Consul. A blow at Britain’s very heart was the proper reply to Perfidious
Albion, and this could only be done by crossing the Channel. ‘They want us to jump the ditch,
and we will jump it!’ he cried….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 151.
Napoleon’s Strategy
31.
32. “…he cried.
“Napoleon, though a military genius, was no naval strategist. He made the fundamental
mistake of assuming that naval forces could be handled like armies, and that they could seize
and hold positions at sea. He believed he could force Britain to act in accordance with his plans
rather than in support of her own strategy and national policy. Admirals of the RN had been so
long at the game they played and possessed such a sure habit of thought that routine actions to
preserve sea communications and guard the homeland and overseas possessions came
automatically. This was fortunate,• for Addington’s ministry was unable to give directions to the
British war aims. Obsessed with fear of Napoleon, the government made no plans at all for the
offensive, instead directing their energies toward repelling the French legions in the Kentish and
Sussex meadows. Impatient, improvident, ill-considered directives went out urging men to enlist
in the Volunteers, but the chief result was to dry up the source of men for the regular army, the
only force that could be used abroad. The reconstituted ‘Sea Fencibles,’ coast-guard militia, ate
into the store of men who might have manned the ships of the navy. The Volunteers enrolled
some of the most illustrious names in the land: Sir Walter Scott, Pitt, Fox, and the Duke of
Clarence. Addington himself wore a uniform into the Commons….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 151-152.
Napoleon’s Strategy
33. “…the Commons.
“Across the Channel Napoleon sneered pityingly at these preparations.
Not for a minute could these enthusiastic amateurs withstand the victors at
Marengo. All that remained was to ‘jump the ditch.’ All this time, almost
forgotten by both attackers and defenders alike, the ditch was defended by
the ships of the RN,• which controlled the situation so thoroughly that all
preparations on both sides were futile.•
“At Boulogne and Calais, at Dunkirk and Le Havre, at every Channel
port and inland river town, French shipwrights toiled at building the
invasion flotilla of 2,000-odd craft. Odd indeed they were, of several types,
but generally flat-bottomed, so that in the tideway they became
unmanageable. Tides in the Straits of Dover are notorious. These barges
were designed to carry the maximum load without regard for sea-keeping
qualities. The preparations were so frenzied that everyone hourly expected
Bonaparte to make the attempt….”
op. cit,, p. 152.
37. n this diagram from the period shows the different types, generally flat-bottomed, of the
2,000 invasion barges nested in the basin which was dredged out for them
n the caption reads :
Disposition of the Equipment
of the Imperial Flotilla
at the port of Boulogne
Thermidor (July-August) year 13 (1805)
38. “…the attempt. The blockading fleet off Brest looked for the
opportunity to close action with the invasion barges. Yet the summer,
fall, and winter dragged on, and still Napoleon did not come. Several
things stood in his way: he was not able to get his flotilla built fast
enough, and everywhere the British navy foiled him. Watchful frigates
noted what went on and snapped up his craft as they moved from their
building ways to the Boulogne area for assembly and staging. The
harbor at Boulogne needed extensive dredging and enlarging. This
being accomplished at tremendous cost in time and effort, it was found
impossible to effect sortie of the whole flotilla on a single tide. Thus
something over twelve hours would elapse before the second part could
follow the first. The French would be committed piecemeal. The delay
would permit British forces to concentrate in order to wipe out the
crowded barges laden with the seasick victors of Marengo….” Ibid.
39.
40. “…of Marengo. So preposterous was the flotilla that keen-minded
naval officers such as Pellew • and St. Vincent wondered whether the
whole thing were not a gigantic feint designed to cover a real threat
elsewhere.•
“But Napoleon was not feinting. He was deadly serious; he meant to
invade with those barges. Yet he stood helpless gazing across the
Channel at the chalk cliffs near Dover so long as the British squadrons
mounted blockade. And these ships kept station through winter and
summer, stations dictated by the enemy’s bases, not by his invasion
flotilla. As Napoleon’s ships struggled back from the Caribbean and
took refuge in the neutral Spanish port of Ferrol, Adm Alexander
Cochrane • quietly sealed them in. The English battleships checked
Napoleon’s every move at sea. As Mahan put it:.….”
op. cit,, pp. 152-153.
41. “Those far distant, storm-beaten ships upon which the Grand Army
never looked stood between it and the dominion of the world.”
— Capt. Alfred Thayer Mahan, USN, The Influence of Sea Power upon the French
Revolution and Empire, 1793–1812 (2 vols., 1892)
42. “I do not say the French will not come; I only say they
will not come by sea.”—Admiral John Jervis, First Earl of St Vincent,
quoted in Padfield, p. 249.
43. “…the world.’
“In spite of this, the capabilities of the British navy were only partially employed. The
blockade required the utmost exertion,• but as Pitt the Elder had shown in the Seven Years
War,• and as his son had shown before the Treaty of Amiens, the navy’s mobility gave
unequalled opportunity for sudden, damaging blows at the enemy. The navy could support,
supply and cooperate with continental allies, and could wrest overseas possessions from a foe
that depended on land communications. For England to remain on the defensive was to
abandon the Continent to Napoleon and possibly risk her whole position in the Orient. To
assume the offensive at this moment of greatest danger was her most prudent course.
“It was to grasp this flower safety out of the nettle danger that Pitt once again assumed the
reins of government….”
op. cit,, p. 153.
Pitt Returns as Prime Minister
45. “…of government.’ He had loyally supported his friend Addington during the year that had
elapsed since the declaration of war. But concluding at length that Addington’s policies gave
no prospect of victory, Pitt reluctantly, on 26 April, St. George’s Day,• assailed in the
Commons the dragon of despair….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Pitt Returns as Prime Minister
England’s historic flag,
the cross of St. George,
the patron saint of England
46. “…of despair. Addington resigned, and on 7 May the King sent for Pitt. Thus the human
embodiment of the offensive spirit was once more leading the British.
“On the same day that Pitt undertook his duties, Napoleon had himself declared Emperor of
the French….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Pitt Returns as Prime Minister
47. “… the French. He immediately made use of his
new power by executing on trumped up charges
of treason the young • Duc d’Enghien. [Either
the comte de la Meurthe or Napoleon's chief of
police, Joseph Fouché,[ said about his execution
"C'est pire qu'un crime, c'est une faute.” (It was
worse than a crime; it was a blunder). The
statement is also sometimes attributed to
Talleyrand]. This murder opened the eyes of the
monarchs of Europe to the fact that they were
dealing with a Jacobin in ermine, a Terror in
purple. They were prepared to listen when Pitt’s
ambassadors proposed an alliance against the
bloody Corsican….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Pitt Returns as Prime Minister
48. “…bloody Corsican. Thus was conceived the Third Coalition. Never completely successful,
it nevertheless seized the initiative from Napoleon. Pitt’s first act was to open negotiations
with Russia, hoping for joint Anglo-Russian activity in the Med. With Austrian assistance, he
planned to attack what Winston Churchill was later to call the ‘soft underbelly of Europe.’
“In the meantime Napoleon had realized that he could not cross the Channel by barges
alone. Hence he conceived the notion of massing ships in the English Channel to drive off or
destroy the blockading fleets. During the summer of 1804, he attempted to ready his ships for
this enterprise. He ordered his most skilled admiral, Latouche-Tréville, to escape from Toulon,
release the French ships at Ferrol and Rochefort, evade Cornwallis at Brest, and appear at
Boulogne in Sept with the combined fleet, which by this time would consist of 16 of the line
and 11 frigates. This scheme seemed so plausible to him that he had a victory medal struck
which bore the inscription: ‘Descente en Angleterre, frappé à Londres en 1804.’….”
Ibid.
49.
50. “It takes small reflection to see the inherent weakness of Napoleon’s plan. First Latouche-
Tréville had to evade Nelson. This was perhaps the easiest task, since Nelson favored a loose
blockade in the hope of drawing his enemy out to destruction. Next the French admiral had to
release blockaded ships at Ferrol and Rochefort; this certainly meant a battle with the
blockaders. In addition, a wind that would be fair for him to force the blockade would be foul
for the blockaded ships to come out of port. Finally, at Brest he had to evade Cornwallis, who
had the advantage of interior position, and if he succeeded in escaping him, he would be
subject to almost certain destruction with an vastly superior, undefeated enemy across his line
of retreat. He would find himself in the position of Medina-Sidonia 216 years before. He
would be too busy fighting for his life to protect the invasion flotilla. Napoleon never realized
that the principal objective of Cornwallis and the others was not blockade but protection of the
Channel. In time of crisis they headed there like iron drawn to a magnet.
“Once that summer Latouche-Tréville did emerge from Toulon, but realizing that he was
running into a trap, hastily returned to port. This was the only result of Napoleon’s first naval
scheme. By Sept, the Emperor realized that the attempt would have to be deferred until the
next year.”
op. cit,, pp. 153-154.
51. “ All summer Pitt had worked to create the new coalition against Napoleon. By Nov, the
Russians, in conjunction with Austria, were prepared to sign a treaty for an Armed League to
be led by Russia but paid for by Britain. This league was to insist on the evacuation of Italy,
Germany and Holland. In return for this support on the Continent, Britain had to make a show
of force in the Med, and this show of force had to be one comprehensible to the land-minded
rulers of Europe. Accordingly, Pitt began to prepare for an army to be sent to that area.
“However, before he could risk an army so far from home, he had to insure the safety of his
communications between England and her bases at Gib and Malta. The position of Spain was
anomalous. Few Spaniards desired another war with England. On the other hand Manuel de
Godoy,….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 154.
The Third Coalition
52. “ All summer Pitt had worked to create the new coalition against Napoleon. By Nov, the
Russians, in conjunction with Austria, were prepared to sign a treaty for an Armed League to
be led by Russia but paid for by Britain. This league was to insist on the evacuation of Italy,
Germany and Holland. In return for this support on the Continent, Britain had to make a show
of force in the Med, and this show of force had to be one comprehensible to the land-minded
rulers of Europe. Accordingly, Pitt began to prepare for an army to be sent to that area.
“However, before he could risk an army so far from home, he had to insure the safety of his
communications between England and her bases at Gib and Malta. The position of Spain was
anomalous. Few Spaniards desired another war with England. On the other hand Manuel de
Godoy, whose title was Prince of the Peace, but who in actuality was dictator of Spain, was
little more than a puppet of Napoleon. When the British cabinet learned that the Corsican had
demanded the active support of the Spanish navy, they knew it would be forthcoming. In Sept,
with Godoy’s consent, 1,500 French troops marched from Bayonne into Spain to man the
French ships at Ferrol….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 154.
The Third Coalition
53.
54. “…at Ferrol.
“Immediately Pitt decided on action. He directed his ambassador in Madrid to demand an
accounting and the demobilization of the Spanish fleet. At the same time he ordered
Cornwallis • to send four frigates to intercept the homecoming Spanish treasure fleet from
Mexico. Both schemes fell afoul of Spanish pride, for Godoy rejected Britain’s
representations, and the small size of the attacking frigate force led the admiral of the treasure
fleet to believe he could not surrender with honor. In the ensuing fight, the Spanish flagship
blew up with a loss of 300 lives. As a consequence the Spaniards declared war on 12 Dec 04.
At once the British blockade was extended to cover Cadiz and Cartagena.
“Turning his eyes on Britain’s colonial possessions, Napoleon directed Adm Comte de
Missiessy, in command of the fleet at Rochefort, and Adm Villeneuve, who had succeeded to
the command of the Toulon fleet on the death of Latouche-Tréville, to raid British colonies
and commerce in the WI….” Ibid.
55. “…the WI. On 11 Jan 05, in the temporary absence of the blockading squadron of Sir Thomas
Graves,• Missiessy sailed with five of the line and an equal number of frigates for Martinique.
Six days later Villeneuve attempted to depart Toulon but was driven back by weather.
As Missiessy approached the WI,• Napoleon’s fertile brain produced a new invasion
scheme. He now conceived what he called his ‘Grand Design.’ Austria’s growing
subservience seemed to him to have wrecked Pitt’s coalition. He felt he could afford to make
the year 1805 the great year for crushing England. Hence he turned definitively and seriously
to his task.”
Ibid.
58. “Invasion had failed in 1803 and again in 1804 because British sea power controlled the
Channel. These failures caused Napoleon to look foolish in the eyes of the world. English wits
jested about Don Quixote ‘de la Manche.’ Now it would be different. Since British sea power
in the Channel blocked his schemes, let the sea power be removed. This, as Bonaparte saw it,
could be accomplished in either of two ways or both ways in combination. His navy could
defeat Britain’s, or the British sea dogs could be tricked into sending their fleets to the wrong
place.
“In barest outline, the plan was to work as follows:….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Napoleon’s Grand Design
59.
60. “…the invasion.
“Such was the Grand Design. It failed for many reasons, but its inherent weakness was that
it did not appreciate a fact that the British understood well—the the English Channel was
Britain’s strategic center, and that whatever other dispositions they might make, the British
would never fail to make provisions for the control of its waters. There, enjoying the
advantage of interior position, they were able to move rapidly to counter any threat to the
strategic center.•
“Orders to implement the Grand Design went forth from Paris to the various commanders
concerned.• Missiessy was instructed to remain in the WI to await the reinforcement of
Villeneuve. At Toulon Villeneuve received his instructions near the end of March 1805, and
taking advantage of Nelson’s loose blockade, sailed for Gib on 30 Mar….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 156.
Napoleon’s Grand Design
Villeneuve Escapes from Toulon
61. “…30 Mar.
“Nelson’s shortage of scouting frigates left him in darkness as to his enemy’s movements. He
could not be sure whether Villeneuve’s destination lay to the E or the W. It was a situation which
reveals Nelson’s appreciation for Britain’s strategy. His mission called for the protection of the
Med station and he knew that its most vulnerable points lay to the E—Naples, Malta and Egypt.
Additionally he knew that Pitt planned ops in the central Med. Nelson has been accused by
detractors of allowing Lady Hamilton to fix his mind on Naples so that it excluded all else….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Villeneuve Escapes from Toulon
62. “…all else. Lady Hamilton was now in
England, but the King of Naples was
Britain’s only ally in the area. It was
further evident that if Villeneuve were
bound for the Channel, Nelson’s decision
to protect his station could have no
serious consequence, for the Combined
[Franco-Spanish] Fleet would have to
pass successively the forces of Sir John
Orde off Cape St. Vincent, Calder off
Ferrol, Graves off Rochefort, and finally
Gardner off Brest,1 before he could reach
his destination….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Villeneuve Escapes from Toulon
______
1 Gardner had temporarily relieved Cornwallis in
command of the Channel fleet.
63. “…his destination. The only other
point of danger would be the WI;
thither Nelson intended to go once
he was sure that his primary
responsibility was secured.
Accordingly he took station off the
island of Ustica,• in position to
guard the approaches to both the
Straits of Messina and the Sicilian
Channel.…”
Ibid.
64.
65. “…Sicilian Channel.
“Meanwhile Villeneuve made his way westward. On 7 Apr he was becalmed off Cartagena
He signaled the Spanish ships in port to join him, but they were not ready for sea, and the
specter of Nelson would not allow him to wait. The next day he passed through the Straits of
Gib, and making the most of an easterly breeze, rounded Cape Trafalgar and set his course for
Cadiz. There he was joined by eight ships under Adm Gravina.• Together they took departure
for the Canary Islands to pick up the easterly trade winds for a swift passage to the Caribbean.
“His passage by Gib did not go unobserved. Sir John Orde, heavily outnumbered, watched
him pass, and then set out for Ushant to warn Gardner and the Admiralty. On the way he
looked into Cadiz, but it was empty. Villeneuve had made good his escape, disappearing into
the Atlantic.”
Ibid.
66.
67.
68. “In England the situation had been complicated by two new developments. The first
resulted from Pitt’s attempt to assume the offensive. On 19 Apr, a force, known as the
‘Secret Expedition,’ under the command of LGen • Sir James Craig sailed from England in
45 transports, guarded by two ships of the line, bound for Malta, to release the garrison
there for conjunct expeditions in the Med. With Villeneuve loose and unaccounted for, this
force was in grave danger, for it was more than possible that Villeneuve had sailed with the
express intention of intercepting and destroying Britain’s only army then available for
overseas ops.
“The decision called for by the new peril had to be made by a man who had just taken
over the Admiralty, for administrative scandals had brought about a Cabinet crisis, forcing
Melville to resign as First Lord.• Hourly Pitt’s own resignation was expected. Yet the PM
held on against all opposition, determined to see the fruition of his plans against Napoleon.
For two weeks the Admiralty was leaderless; then, ignoring the wishes of the King and
most of his own cabinet, Pitt named Admiral Charles Middleton, Lord Barham, to this
most demanding of positions.…”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 156-157.
Britain Takes the Offensive
69.
70. “…of positions.
”On 25 Apr, as Barham, vigorous and keen-minded as ever, assumed his duties, news
reached London of the escape of Villeneuve. Barham quietly issued the necessary orders. •
Since no one knew where Nelson had gone, Barham took steps to reinforce the W Indian
station and also to insure the safety of Craig’s Secret Expedition.• Gardner was ordered to
give VAdm Collingwood • a Flying Squadron of five ships which was to cross to Jamaica to
bring the forces there to 18 of the line. At the same time, forced by the news Orde had
brought, Barham took measures to reinforce Calder and Graves.• He laid down as a policy
that, come what might, the force off Ushant should never be brought below 18 ships, and that
all other instructions might receive were to be conditional on this requirement. The situation
was only slightly eased by the surprise return of Missiessy to Rochefort. He had come back
to Europe on the false assumption that Villeneuve had abandoned the WI op. Already the
machinery of the Great Design was beginning to creak.”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 157.
Britain Takes the Offensive
71. ”Nelson in the meantime was fuming in his station near Ustica.• With every passing day it
became more evident that Villeneuve had designs to the W, not the E. On 10 Apr he chanced to
learn that the Secret Expedition was actually about to sail, and he realized that it was in grave
danger.• Immediately he began to beat his way westward against head winds. In nine days he
made good only 200 miles. On the 18th he learned from a neutral vessel of Villeneuve’s
rendezvous with Gravina • off Cadiz and realized that something important was in the air. He
decided that if he got no further information he would take his ships to join those of Gardner.
When he finally arrived at Gib on 8 May, he received dispatches from the Admiralty informing
him in detail about the Secret Expedition, and to his vast relief, he learned that it had taken
shelter in Lisbon. Once again Nelson began to believe that Villeneuve’s destination was the
WI. The Allies had been on a westerly course when last seen; this was suggestive but not
conclusive, for they would have had to make considerable westing to clear Cape St.
Vincent….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 157-158.
Nelson’s Pursuit of Villeneuve
72. ”…St. Vincent. Still in a quandary, Nelson
took his 11 ships to Lagos Bay to provision
against a long voyage. There he learned
from a frigate just out of England that
Villeneuve had not been reported to the N.
Nelson was now convinced, and on 9 May,
he made his famous decision to cross the
Atlantic in pursuit of his quarry. On the 11th,
after completing arrangements for the
security of his station and the safety of the
Secret Expedition, Nelson, more than a
month behind his enemy, set out in pursuit.”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 158.
Nelson’s Pursuit of Villeneuve
73.
74. “On 14 May Villeneuve reached Martinique. Here he grappled
with the problem of useful employment while he waited his required
40 days before returning to Europe. French military authorities urged
action against British colonies, but now Villeneuve began to
appreciate the dilemma his orders placed him in. If he undertook
actions in the WI, he risked casualties that would weaken him for his
primary task, forcing the blockade at Brest if Ganteaume had been
unsuccessful in making good his escape. But unless he did something
no pressure would be put on the British navy to reinforce the WI
area, and hence no weakening of the Channel fleet could be expected.
It was a knotty problem. To make matters worse, word reached him
of a powerful British fleet operating near Santo Domingo and Puerto
Rico.• This was Cochrane’s six of the line, far inferior to Villeneuve’s
19. The first action Villeneuve undertook was the reduction of a small
island called Diamond Rock, garrisoned by the RN [it controlled the
strait between St. Lucia and Martinique].• This proved harder than
had been expected and took him 15 days….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Operations in the West Indies
75. « Capture of the Diamond Rock»
by Auguste Mayer(1815)
76. “…15 days. Then he learned that he was to operate against British colonies in conjunction with
Adm Magon, who had escaped from Rochefort with 800 troops. Thirty-five days after Magon’s
arrival, if not joined by Ganteaume, Villeneuve was to sail back to Ferrol. When Magon
arrived, Villeneuve decided to do the best he could and departed Martinique to attack Antigua
or Barbuda.
“It was well for Villeneuve that he moved off when he did, for as Magon dropped anchor in
Martinique harbor,• Nelson arrived at Barbados. It was almost as if the ships had responded to
their leader’s eagerness, for they had made an almost record crossing of 24 days, averaging 135
miles a day. Wasting no time, Nelson embarked troops, and adding to his command two ships
of Cochrane’s which he found at Barbados, was off the next day—on a false scent as it
happened, for he received intelligence that Villeneuve would be found at Trinidad. On arrival
he learned the truth—that Villeneuve’s destination had been Antigua. Thither Nelson bent his
course.…”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Operations in the West Indies
77. “…his course.
“In the meantime Villeneuve chanced upon and captured a British convoy of sugar ships and
learned the appalling news that Nelson was on his heels. He made up his mind immediately.
Gone was any idea of waiting for a concentration in the WI. Gone was his plan of cooperation
with the Grand Design. All that Villeneuve could think of was his terrible pursuer. He had been
the only flag officer to escape from the Battle of the Nile, and he had never forgotten that
holocaust.• Now the victor of the Nile was once again on his track. He could endure no more.
The next morning he transferred his troops to frigates and set sail for Ferrol.…”
Ibid.
78.
79. “…for Ferrol.
“At Antigua Nelson found no sight of Villeneuve.• He was four days too late. Once again
indecision tormented him. Then the schooner Netley settled his doubts. She had been one of the
escorts for the captured convoy, and powerless to interfere, had shadowed the Combined Fleet,
now 23 strong as they took departure for Europe. At last Nelson could act. Whether Villeneuve
was headed for the Channel or Cadiz, Nelson’s responsibilities lay at his station. The night
before sailing he wrote, ‘I am going toward the Med after Gravina and Villeneuve, and hope to
catch them.’ He had already dispatched the brig Curieux to England with a warning that the
believed the Combined Fleet was heading for Europe. At noon on 13 Jul, Nelson, having spent
little more than a week in the WI, took his fleet out of harbor and set course for Gib.…”
op. cit,, pp. 158-159.
80. “…for Ferrol.
“At Antigua Nelson found no sight of Villeneuve.• He was four days too late. Once again
indecision tormented him. Then the schooner Netley settled his doubts. She had been one of the
escorts for the captured convoy, and powerless to interfere, had shadowed the Combined Fleet,
now 23 strong as they took departure for Europe. At last Nelson could act. Whether Villeneuve
was headed for the Channel or Cadiz, Nelson’s responsibilities lay at his station. The night
before sailing he wrote, ‘I am going toward the Med after Gravina and Villeneuve, and hope to
catch them.’ He had already dispatched the brig Curieux to England with a warning that the
believed the Combined Fleet was heading for Europe. At noon on 13 Jul, Nelson, having spent
little more than a week in the WI, took his fleet out of harbor and set course for Gib.
“In her passage, the Curieux justified her name.• On 10 Jun, in position 33º 12’ N, 58º 00’
W, she sighted Villeneuve’s fleet still standing northward. She shadowed them long enough to
be sure of her enemy’s course, and then made all possible speed for Plymouth.…”
op. cit,, pp. 158-159.
81.
82. “…for Plymouth. On arrival there, her captain had rushed by post to London, only to be told
that Lord Barham had retired and no one dared wake him. Early in the morning of 8 Jul,
Barham awoke and was furious, so the story goes, that he had not been informed immediately.
The meaning of the Curieux’s intelligence was plain. From that position, and from the northerly
course, Villeneuve could not be heading for Cadiz. His objective must be either the Channel or
Ferrol. It became imperative to strengthen Calder • at Ferrol, for there lay the point of greatest
weakness. Accordingly Barham sent orders to Cornwallis to send Stirling from the Rochefort
blockade with eight ships to strengthen Calder off Cape Finisterre. On 15 Jul, Stirling joined
Calder.
“The junction was none too soon. A week later, with a heavy mist and a gentle westerly
swell, Calder’s lookouts discerned a strange fleet to westward. It was the Combined Fleet
making for Ferrol. It was the business of Calder and Stirling to stop them. Calder had found the
opportunity Nelson had twice crossed the Atlantic to win.”
op. cit,, p. 159.
83. “Sir Robert Calder had the chance Nelson later exploited at Trafalgar. Had he been
successful, he might have gone down in history as one of England’s truly great admirals. In
London the area between the Mall and the Strand might have been named Finisterre Square,
and the Prince of Wales rather than the Victory have been preserved in the Portsmouth Naval
Base. Trafalgar would never have been fought. Instead Villeneuve and Gravina escaped almost
scot-free and reached Ferrol, while Calder was left to face court-martial on the same charge that
had cost Byng his life half a century earlier—failure to do his utmost.
“There was no question of Calder’s courage. He did not hesitate to seek action against the
Combined Fleet when he sighted it through the mist. His weakness was in lack of imagination,
in ability to force the enemy’s hand. He was indefatigable, but his perceptions did not keep
pace with his energies. He could not cope with the unexpected.…”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Calder’s Battle with Villeneuve
84. “…the unexpected.
“Calder’s plan of action was a simple one.
He was sailing in two divisions, close-hauled
on the starboard tack on a southwesterly course.
Villeneuve was on the opposite course in three
divisions in order of sailing. Although the fleets
sighted each other about noon, neither was able
to make out much about the other for nearly
two hours. Then Villeneuve formed line of
battle in a single line. Calder in the meantime
maneuvered to get between Ferrol and the
enemy to cut off his line of retreat. Like Nelson,
later at Trafalgar, he planned to mass on the
enemy’s center and rear, leaving the Spanish
van unengaged but, unlike Nelson, he made no
provision to contain the van….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 159-160.
Calder’s Battle with Villeneuve
PRINCE OF WALES
85. “…the van.Though Calder could count from 20
to 22 of the line opposing his 18, there was no
thought in his mind but attack. About 1530
[3:30 pm] he formed in line of battle on a
course that led him to the leeward, thus giving
the initiative to the Allies, but retaining his
position to intercept a dash for Ferrol. Visibility
then deteriorated, and the two fleets lost sight
of one another. When visibility improved, 15
minutes later, the two fleets were on opposite
tacks, nearly parallel and just out of range.
“Villeneuve believed that Calder intended to
double his rear, and to counter such a maneuver
he ordered Gravina • to lead the fleet in wearing
in succession the moment he heard firing from
the rear….” op. cit,, p. 160.
ARGONAUTA
86. “…the rear. Whether by misunderstanding or
perception, Gravina, unchecked as a result of
Calder’s failure to hold the Allied van, wore
immediately. Simultaneously the Hero,• leading
the British line, reached the center of the Allied
fleet. Calder ordered his ships to tack in
succession and engage on the same tack as the
enemy from leeward. Six ships had tacked and
were on a northerly course paralleling the
enemy when the Hero beheld a strange ship
looming up out of the mist ahead of her. Calder
could not see what was happening. It was
entirely up to Capt Gardner [2nd Bart. Gardner,
son of Adm Gardner], commanding the
Hero….”
Ibid.
ARGONAUTA
87. “…the Hero. If he held on, the two fleets would
pass on opposite courses and nothing decisive
could be accomplished. In addition, the Allied
fleet would have a free run for Ferrol. On his
own responsibility Gardner tacked to port,•
leading the fleet on a SWerly course and
forcing Gravina • to adopt this course also. By
the time Calder • was able to perceive what had
happened, six ships had followed the Hero, and
Calder had no choice but to accept the massing
on the Allied van and center to which Gravina’s
early turn had committed him. Before any
decisive results could be obtained, fog closed
in, so that gunners fired at flashes and the sound
of guns….”
Ibid.
ARGONAUTA
88. Admiral Sir Robert Calder's action off Cape Finisterre, 23 July 1805, by William Anderson. The captured Spanish prizes
Firme and San Raphael, are under tow on the right and the damaged HMS Windsor Castle, on the left.—Wikipedia
89. Sir Robt Calder's Action, July 22nd 1805. Defiance, Windsor Castle, Prince of
Wales, Repulse, Raisonable; Ferrol 23 July 1805; aquatint, coloured.
Whitcombe, Thomas (artist); Sutherland, Thomas (engraver) — 1 Mar 1817—Wikipedia
90. “…of guns. This game of blind man’s death continued until after nightfall. About 2100, the action
finally over, the British discovered that they had captured two Spanish ships and had one of their
own crippled by the loss of a foretopmast.
“There is little to criticize in Calder’s action. Considering the conditions, he did as well as he
could. He was not one to force a melee. The diagram showing the position of the ships at the outset
of the battle looks surprisingly like that of Trafalgar turned upside down….”
Ibid.
91.
92.
93. “…upside down. But Calder elected to fight in a formal line of battle, and this decision gave
Gravina his opportunity to succor the rear. Once Gravina had turned, there was little Calder could
have done, even had he been able to see and so control his fleet. And it was not for the battle that
Calder was called to face his court martial….”
Ibid.
94. “…court martial. It was his action, or rather, lack of it the next day. Secondary considerations, such
as preserving his prizes and repairing and reforming his fleet, took precedence over rejoining battle.
In his defense, Calder claimed that Villeneuve’s possession of the weather gage made it impossible
for the British fleet to close. But the following day, the 24th, the wind shifted, giving Calder the
weather gage, and still he made no attempt to come to grips. He later claimed he feared the 16 ships
at Ferrol would come out to support Villeneuve. If they had been coming out, it would have been
better for Calder to have fought the two fleets piecemeal before they could unite against him.
“Villeneuve was content to leave well enough alone. At the first opportunity, he gave up the
attempt to reach Ferrol and set his course for Cadiz. As the weather worsened, on Gravina’s advice,
Villeneuve decided to run for Vigo, which he reached on 28 Jul. There he found that the Ferrol fleet
was still at its base, so he made up his mind to join it.”
Ibid.
96. “Meanwhile Nelson had bent on all sail in his crossing of the Atlantic and made landfall on Cape
St. Vincent on 17 Jul, entering Gib two days later. Here, setting foot ashore for the first time in
over two years, he sought intelligence of Villeneuve. Receiving none, Nelson gradually came to the
conclusion that Villeneuve’s destination lay to the northward, either Ireland or the Channel. While
Lord Barham was penning orders directing him to return to England, Nelson made up his mind to
go place his ships at the disposal of Cornwallis.•
“The crisis was at hand. Napoleon believed that the time was ripe for the crossing. He had
collected his invasion forces and had prepared the barges. He ordered his Imperial Guard to
Boulogne and proceeded there himself. Now if ever was the time. Yet the day after he summoned
the Guard, he countermanded the order. News had reached him that Nelson was back in Europe.
Then, on the same day, 8 Aug, he received word from Villeneuve, claiming victory over Calder and
reporting that he was in Vigo. Napoleon at once proclaimed a victory and sent imperative orders for
Villeneuve to go N, not to enter Ferrol, but to press on to the Channel to carry out the destiny of
empire….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 160-161.
The Crisis
97. “…of empire.
“By chance Villeneuve had already left Vigo, but not with the high purpose of his Emperor. He
was discouraged; his ships’ stores were short, and his crews weakened by dysentery and scurvy. He
left, not to fight, but to creep into Ferrol, which afforded facilities not available in Vigo.• When he
arrived, half his fleet had entered the port before Napoleon’s prohibition reached him. He anchored
his remaining ships in Corunna Bay and waited for his chance. On 10 Aug, anxious to repair the
damage done by his unwitting disobedience of orders, Villeneuve, heartsick and discouraged, sailed
with 14 fresh ships from Ferrol, bringing his force up to 29 of the line. ‘I am sailing,’ he wrote to
Decrès, the French Naval Minister, ‘and I shall make for Brest or Cadiz according to
circumstances. The enemy observe us too closely here to leave any hope of concealing our
movement.’•
“As Villeneuve was struggling to leave Ferrol, the RN was concentrating, true to the reflex
action of centuries, at the mouth of the Channel.• Calder, finding his station vacant, raised the
blockade and headed for Ushant, joining Cornwallis with ten ships a few hours after Stirling had
come in with seven. ”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 161.
The Crisis
98. “…with seven. To the fleet of 27 then assembled, Nelson the next day added his 12, bringing the
total to 39. This was the outcome of Napoleon’s plan to disperse the British fleet.•
“For a few days after leaving Ferrol, Villeneuve held on to the NW, as though to gain westing for
a run to the Channel. But as his letters show, as early as 13 Aug, he had decided to go instead to
Cadiz. After two days of desultory movements, of shying at the sight of every strange sail,
Villeneuve lost heart. On the evening of 15 Aug he gave the order which put his fleet on the course
for Cadiz.•
“At the mouth of the Channel the extraordinary concentration prepared for his reception was
already breaking up. Since no danger immediately threatened, it should be possible to go out from
the interior position to intercept trouble at its source. On his own initiative and just as Barham was
ordering him to do that very thing, Cornwallis sent Calder with 18 of the line back to Ferrol. These
provided the backbone of the force that was to blockade Villeneuve at Cadiz and that Nelson was to
employ at Trafalgar.• At the same time Cornwallis detached Nelson in the Victory to proceed to
Portsmouth….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
The Crisis
99. “…to Portsmouth. The latter arrived there on 18 Aug 05 and struck his flag. He had been concerned
about his reputation after his fruitless 14,000 mile pursuit of Villeneuve. But the warmth of the
crowds reassured him. The drama of his relentless chase had fired the imagination of the British
public so that they made the most of ‘our hero of the Nile.’ Only in London was there a sign of
coolness.• Barham, apparently distrusting this impetuous young admiral—Nelson was 47—had
made the almost unprecedented move of asking for his journal, a request he scarcely would have
made of a man he trusted. Whatever it was Barham read, it converted him, and Nelson’s personal
reception by the First Lord on his arrival in London was all that he could have asked. There, too, by
chance, he met a soldier who,• though generally unknown at the time, was to be forever linked with
his name. There the future victor at Trafalgar exchanged views on the war with the future victor in
Spain and at Waterloo—Arthur Wellesley, later the Duke of Wellington.•
“On 20 Aug, Villeneuve entered Cadiz. This ended once and for all Napoleon’s Grand Design.
At first the port could not be said to be blockaded, for Collingwood had but four ships to watch
Villeneuve’s 27….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
The Crisis
100. “…Villeneuve’s 27. But Calder, finding Ferrol empty, had sailed on and closed Cadiz in tight on 29
Aug. Villeneuve’s timidity had frustrated the Grand Design, but had saved him [and the Army of
England!] from annihilation. Now affairs were back to normal, with the relentless British
blockading Napoleon’s naval strength.• The concentration of the Marine Imperiale in the Channel
would never occur.
“Toward the end of Aug, for the first time since taking office,• Pitt could look around with some
degree of satisfaction; the naval threat had diminished the danger of invasion was at an end, and,
best of all, his plans on the Continent were bearing fruit. The things Napoleon had believed
impossible had come to pass, partly because of Pitt’s endeavors and partly because Napoleon’s own
actions had so roused the fears of the Continent that some governments at last were showing a
desperate courage and turning to face the Emperor. Russia, which had raised difficulties in the
negotiations with Britain, fell into line when she received news of Napoleon’s seizure of the crown
of Italy and of his annexation of Genoa….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 161-162.
The Crisis
101. “…of Genoa. Austria and Prussia both prepared to make a stand, and Craig’s Secret Expedition had
safely entered Valetta in Malta. Now England had in the Med a force that could exploit the mobility
of sea power to strike in conjunction with Russia, Austria and Prussia against the French in the
Italian peninsula.•
“Inexorably the forces of circumstance were turning Napoleon’s back on the English Channel
and his face toward Central Europe. He still clung to the hope of a quick victory over England, but
he knew it had to be quick. As early as 13 Aug,• the Emperor had informed Talleyrand that they
would be in Vienna by Nov, prepared to deal with Russia if need arose.• Believing Villeneuve to be
enroute to Brest to raise the blockade, Napoleon dispatched an optimistic order • to Ganteaume to
be prepared to sortie. ‘Never,’ he wrote, ‘will my soldiers of the land and sea risk their lives for a
greater goal.’ And to Villeneuve: ‘I hope you are at Brest. Sail without losing a moment and enter
the Channel with my reunited squadrons. England is ours! We are ready. Everything is embarked.
Appear but for twenty-four hours and all will be finished.’….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 162.
The Crisis
102. “…be finished.
“At this point, when all depended on the French navy, Napoleon received Villeneuve’s letter from
Ferrol stating that he would make for Brest or Cadiz. It was rankest treachery,• Napoleon raged, that
Villeneuve could even consider Cadiz. Yet on Villeneuve’s decision hung his own. If his admiral
appeared off Ushant, Napoleon would invade and crush England. If he had gone to the S of Spain,
then Napoleon would lead 200,000 men into Austria.”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
The Crisis
103. “For two days Napoleon kept an anxious eye on the waters of the Channel. A letter from Decrès
bore that minister’s conviction that Villeneuve had indeed gone to Cadiz. Summoning his secretary,
• Napoleon ranted for five minutes, expressing his disgust for navies in general and Villeneuve in
particular. Suddenly he exclaimed, ‘Sit! Write!’ Then for several hours he poured out with great
detail and precision his whole plan for the campaign against Austria, a plan that was to lead to the
victories of Austerlitz and Ulm. For a few days he held his position at Boulogne, largely to deceive
the British while preparations were made, and it was during this time, on 1 Sept,• that he received
final word from Villeneuve that he was in fact at Cadiz.
“In view of his new plans, Napoleon had a new use for his naval forces, and fresh orders went
out to Villeneuve, directing him to leave Cadiz and enter the Med to support the Austrian campaign
by attacking Naples. At the same time, having had enough of Villeneuve’s lack of determination,he
secretly dispatched Adm Rosily to relieve him.
“As Napoleon was setting his face toward the Austerlitz campaign,• Nelson was taking leave of
his friends in London, before departing to resume his old command….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 162.
New Decisions
104. “…old command. Gone were the suspicions Barham had had of him. Nelson had completely won
the old man over. He spent much time at the Admiralty planning steps in the campaign in the Med.
On 13 Sept,• after taking leave of his beloved Emma, Nelson proceeded to Spithead where,the next
day, he was met by cheering crowds. Many wept, and not a few knelt and blessed him as he passed.
That afternoon he once more hoisted his flag in the Victory, which sailed the next morning in
company with a frigate. By 23 Sept he was off Lisbon. He sent urgent messages to the British
Consul there and to Collingwood not to disclose his coming, for, as he wrote, ‘I hope to see the
enemy at sea.’ As a result when, on 28 Sept, the Victory joined Collingwood’s fleet, not a gun
saluted, and not a flag was broken.
“Although Nelson’s arrival was not marked with outward show, his spirit quickly permeated the
fleet. Never had Nelson’s leadership shown itself more inspired. These were not the ships of his old
Med command. Few of the officers had served under him before, but he began to work to inspire
others with the will to serve….”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 162-163.
New Decisions
105. “…to serve. Every officer and man who came under his influence soon realized that this admiral
was no autocrat to demand blind obedience. He was rather a leader who inspired his subordinates to
work with a will, with intelligence, and with freedom to exercise initiative to achieve a common
goal. He expected his subordinates to exercise their professional competence in carrying out a
plan.It was in this spirit that the famous Memorandum was written. It was in this spirit that he
allowed Calder to go home in his own flagship, the 98-gun Prince of Wales, to face court martial,
thereby depriving himself of a three-decker on the eve of action.”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 163.
New Decisions
106. “On taking command off Cadiz, Nelson had as his primary objective luring Villeneuve to sea
that he might destroy him. To this end he adopted the loose blockade that he had favored at Toulon.
Watchful frigates kept Cadiz under observation while the main fleet cruised some distance to the
westward. Knowing that Villeneuve could command from 30 to 35 of the line, and further realizing
that it might be a long wait before Villeneuve emerged, Nelson had to make plans for provisioning
his fleet in relays while at all times remaining ready to fight. To this end he dispatched Adm Louis
with five ships to Tetuan Bay to replenish. Having no opportunity for the informal discussions with
his captains that had preceded the Battle of the Nile, he set his ideas on paper as a guide for his
officers. The Memorandum is worth quoting in part as an example of Nelson’s tactical thinking and
of his trust and confidence in subordinates.…”
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 163.
Nelson’s Memorandum
107. “…in subordinates.
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
Nelson’s Memorandum
Thinking it almost impossible to bring a fleet of forty sail of the line into line of battle in
variable winds thick weather and other circumstances which must occur, without such a loss
of time that the opportunity would probably be lost of bringing the enemy to battle in such a
manner as to make the business decisive—
I have therefore made up my mind…that the order of sailing is to be the order of battle….
The second in command will after my intentions are made known to him have the entire
direction of his line to make the attack upon the enemy and to follow up the blow until they
are captured or destroyed.
The whole impression of the British fleet must be to overpower from two to three ahead of
their commander-in-chief, supposed to be in the center, to the rear of their fleet….Something
must be left to chance; nothing is sure in a sea fight above all others. Shot will carry away
the masts and yards of friends as well as foes but I look with confidence to a victory before
the van of the enemy could succor their rear….
The second in command will in all possible things direct the movements of his line by
keeping them as compact as the nature of the circumstances will admit. Captains are to look
to their particular line as their rallying point. But in case signals can neither be seen or
perfectly understood no captain can do very wrong if he places his ship alongside that of an
enemy….”
109. “…the enemy.
8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 163-164.
Nelson’s Memorandum
. “This memorandum is noteworthy especially for its spirit of aggressiveness, its trust of juniors,
its simplicity, and its confidence in victory. While it in no way abandoned the Admiral’s control
of his ships,• it left complete initiative to Collingwood, his second in command, ‘after my
intentions are made known to him.’ The plan provided for flexibility and for the greatest freedom
of action on the part of each captain. Briefly, Nelson’s plan was to divide his fleet into three
divisions, Collingwood ’s to leeward to deliver the principal thrust on the enemy rear,• Nelson’s
own windward division to contain the van and then strike at the center and force a decision
before the enemy van could get back to take part in the battle. He also planned for a reserve
division of eight ships to give support as needed..”
The Battle of Trafalgar
. “On the morning of 19 Oct, the inshore frigate hoisted Signal Number 370: ‘The enemy’s ships
are coming out of port or getting under sail.’…”
110. 8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
op. cit,, p. 164.
.“…under sail. By 0930 the news had reached Nelson. The opportunity he had worked for so
long had arrived.•
“What caused Villeneuve to go out to face the implacable opponent who had so long
blockaded him and who had twice pursued him across the Atlantic? Napoleon’s orders to proceed
to Naples had been most peremptory. On 17 Oct, Villeneuve had heard that Rosily was in Madrid
and on his way to take command of the Allied fleet. Rather than endure the disgrace of being
relieved under conditions that suggested cowardice, Villeneuve decided he would try to make the
Straits of Gib before he was intercepted. If not, well then, death with honor was preferable to the
alternative.• He hoisted anchor the next day, but it was not until the 20th that he was able to get
his ships out and formed up. Then he began a dash for the Straits….”
The Battle of Trafalgar
111. “So, it seems it was Napoleon’s disgust with a navy he
never understood and an admiral he despised that finally
led to a purposeless fleet action which both Villeneuve
and Gravina knew could not be won.”—Padfield, p. 230
“When Nelson heard of Villeneuve’s departure, he guessed it could mean only that he was
bound for the Straits, and he took a course to intercept. He did not wish Villeneuve to sight
him too soon and retreat to Cadiz. On 20 Oct, the British fleet was near Gib, but there was no
sight of the Allies. Nor was there sign of Louis and his four ships which Nelson hoped to see
there….”
op. cit,, p. 164.
112. Ibid.
.“…see there. Beating back toward Cadiz, the British learned from a scouting frigate that
Villeneuve had only just completed his sortie from the port. Nelson was jubilant. That night he
invited several midshipmen to dinner, promising them that the morrow would bring something
for them to talk about all the rest of their lives.
“Villeneuve, his ships at length formed up, set sail for the Straits of Gib at noon on 20 Oct. He
did not really expect to make it without a fight, but he was determined to press on. During the
night, Nelson who had come back to within 25 miles of Cadiz had opened out again toward the
SW to allow the Allies to gain sea room, but most especially to keep them from running to Cadiz
before he could force an engagement. Villeneuve seems to have predicted the tactics Nelson
would employ; at least he foresaw a concentration on his center and rear. During the night he
held on for the Straits, expecting to receive the smashing broadsides of the ‘fougueux
amiral,’ [fiery] as the French called Nelson. Out of the dark they had struck at the Nile, and out
of the dark they might strike again. But the night passed without incident.
“As the dawn broke on 21 Oct, the sea was smooth, with a gentle breeze from the WNW….”
113. Ibid.
.“…the WNW. Cape Trafalgar lay to the E about 20 miles. To anxious lookouts on the British
ships came the welcome sight of white patches of canvas on the eastern horizon. A little after
0600, Nelson began to implement his Memorandum. Because of the absence of Louis’ ships, he
discarded the idea of a reserve division and sent a signal for his fleet of 27 sail to form two
columns on an easterly course. He, in the Victory, led the northern or windward column, while
Collingwood in the Royal Sovereign headed the southern or leeward column.•
“About this time Villeneuve, realizing that he could not reach the Strait without engagement,
gave the order to wear together and form a column of battle in inverse order. This had the effect
of turning the Allied fleet into a single line on a northerly course, the Third Squadron under
Dumanoir leading. Yet the order came too late for the Allies to retreat to Cadiz. There was no
hope of avoiding engagement. As he saw the situation, one of the Spanish captains snapped his
telescope shut and exclaimed, ‘Perdidos!’
“As Villeneuve’s ships made their turn the line became slightly bowed, concave towards the
British….”
114.
115.
116. op. cit,, pp. 164-165.
.“…the British. The handier ships were
forced to back sail to wait for the laggardly
ones. Thus for nearly two hours the Allied
fleet made good no distance at all, while the
British, their two columns at an oblique
angle to the Franco-Spanish line, advanced
with all sails set, including studding-sails.
As a result, the rearmost vessels in both
columns tended to lag behind. •
Collingwood, in compliance with the
Memorandum, was heading to cut the Allied
line at the twelfth ship from the rear,• while
Nelson was on a course for a point two
miles ahead of the enemy van. Since the
Allied ships were heading N, the relative
movement put the Victory on a collision
course with the Neptuno….”
117. op. cit,, p. 165.
.“…the Neptuno. The psychological pressure
on the waiting French and Spanish was
tremendous. No one could tell where the blow
would fall. So long as Nelson held his course,
the Allied van had to brace to receive the
onslaught of Nelson’s 12 juggernauts. Yet by
simply putting the helm over, Nelson could
deliver his thrust at Villeneuve’s center, with
the van held out of action by the wind and by
the necessity of reversing course. Thus was
concentration achieved at Trafalgar, for
Nelson’s squadron acted as a holding force on
the Allied center and van to support
Collingwood’s attack on the rear, while
Nelson’s own course held the Allied van to
cover his smash into the center. In this double
role for his own squadron lay Nelson’s
brilliance….”
118. 8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
Ibid.
.“…Nelson’s brilliance. Where Calder had failed to hold the Allied van until he could force a
decision, Nelson, by his knowledge of the enemy’s psychology and by his threat to the van,
insured that it would be out of action while he and Collingwood disposed of the center and rear.
“As the morning wore on, the British continued their implacable closing on the Allies. The
two British columns, their black and yellow hulls somber under their clouds of canvas, their guns
run out and double-shotted, were forbidding indeed.• Nelson had given considerable attention to
the order of his ships in the columns. Anticipating that his leading ships might be in action before
the rearmost ones could catch up, he had headed each column with his heaviest ships. Leading
his own were the three three-deckers, the Victory, 100 guns, and the Téméraire and Neptune, 98
guns each. Leading Collingwood’s squadron were the Royal Sovereign, 100, and the Prince, 98.
As the fleets neared one another, several of Nelson’s officers pleaded with him to allow another
ship to lead the column lest Nelson himself be uselessly killed or disabled. Nelson appeared to
acquiesce, and signals were made for the Téméraire to take the lead. But when the Téméraire,
slightly handier than the Victory, began to edge forward, Nelson ordered her back into position
second in line….”
The Battle of Trafalgar
119. Ibid.
.“…in line.
“About 1100, when it seemed battle would be joined in another hour, Nelson went below to
his cabin. Here he made a codicil to his will and composed a prayer which he left to his country:
“After he returned to the deck, Nelson was informed that Cape Trafalgar had been sighted.
He then announced that he would amuse the fleet with a signal. At 1135 there rose to the
Victory’s yardarm,• ’England expects that every man will do his duty’….”
May the great God whom I worship grant to my country, and for the benefit of Europe in
general, a great and glorious victory; and may no misconduct of anyone tarnish it; and may
humanity after victory be the predominant feature of the British fleet. For myself,
individually, I commit my life to Him who made me, and may His blessing light upon my
endeavours for serving my country faithfully. To Him I resign myself and the just cause
which is entrusted to me to defend.
120. Ibid.
.“…in line.
“About 1100, when it seemed battle would be joined in another hour, Nelson went below to
his cabin. Here he made a codicil to his will and composed a prayer which he left to his country:
“After he returned to the deck, Nelson was informed that Cape Trafalgar had been sighted.
He then announced that he would amuse the fleet with a signal. At 1135 there rose to the
Victory’s yardarm,• ’England expects that every man will do his duty’ There followed another,
which remained flying until it was shot away • —Number 16, ‘Engage the enemy more
closely.’….”
May the great God whom I worship grant to my country, and for the benefit of Europe in
general, a great and glorious victory; and may no misconduct of anyone tarnish it; and may
humanity after victory be the predominant feature of the British fleet. For myself,
individually, I commit my life to Him who made me, and may His blessing light upon my
endeavours for serving my country faithfully. To Him I resign myself and the just cause
which is entrusted to me to defend.
121. .“…more closely.’
“The moment was at hand. About noon,
while the Victory was still out of range and still
relentlessly steering for the Allied van,•
Collingwood’s division began the action. Instead
of steering, as the Memorandum directed, to
isolate the last 12 ships in the Allied line,
Collingwood decided to cut off the last 16, thus
opposing his 15 ships to a superior number. But
he relied on superior British seamanship and
gunnery, and in these he was not disappointed.•
Nelson apparently approved, for as Collingwood
bore down on the Santa Ana, he exclaimed, ‘See
how that noble fellow Collingwood carries his
ship into action!’ Collingwood’s division was by
this time no longer in column, but in line of
bearing to the SW….”
op. cit,, pp. 165-166.
122.
123. .“…the SW.’ As the enemy’s rear was curved
toward the SW, it made the two lines nearly
parallel and brought Collingwood’s ships into
action much more rapidly than was possible for
Nelson’s,• still in column. Within 15 minutes,
eight of Collingwood’s ships had broken
through the Allied rear, and soon all were
furiously engaging the enemy.•
“Meanwhile the French and Spanish admirals
had broken their colors. Satisfied that his feint
toward the van had prevented Villeneuve from
interfering with Collingwood, and that it was too
late for Dumanoir to counter his own attack,
Nelson directed • Hardy, captain of the Victory,
to turn to starboard and make for the
Bucentaure, Villeneuve’s flagship. About 1230,
the Victory put her helm over and bore down….”
op. cit,, p. 166.
124.
125. .“…bore down.’Finding the Redoubtable close astern of the Bucentaure, Hardy asked Nelson
which ship he should run down, and received the reply, ‘Take your choice, Hardy, it does not
much signify which.’ As the Victory passed astern of the Bucentaure she discharged her port
broadside, causing over a hundred casualties and unnerving Villeneuve. Behind the Victory in
quick succession followed the Téméraire, Neptune, Leviathan, Conqueror, Britannia, Ajax, and
Nelson’s old Agamemnon.
“Nelson, his task accomplished, having successfully brought his fleet into action, quietly
walked the quarterdeck of the Victory with his old friend Hardy. As was his custom in battle,
Nelson wore his medals, making himself a conspicuous target.….”
Ibid.
126.
127. .“…conspicuous target. All around were scenes of horror and destruction. Blood flowed across
the white decks and collected in streams in the scuppers. Nelson’s secretary, standing near him,
was smashed by a ball. ‘This is too warm work, Hardy,’ Nelson remarked, ‘to last long.’As they
continued their stroll, Hardy suddenly noticed that he was alone. Turning, he saw Nelson
collapsing on the deck….”
Ibid.
128.
129. .“…the deck.’’They have done for me at last, Hardy,’ Nelson murmured. As he was borne below,
he covered his medals with his handkerchief so that the men might not recognize him and be
disheartened….”
Ibid.
130.
131. .“…be disheartened. In the cockpit the surgeon could only confirm Nelson’s diagnosis. A
sharpshooter in the rigging of the Redoubtable had picked him off, the ball passing through his
shoulder, lung and spine, and lodging in his hip. Five minutes later, Villeneuve surrendered the
Bucentaure. By such a narrow margin was Nelson robbed of receiving the submission of his
rival.
“While the action continued, Nelson in Victory’s cockpit was kept informed of the progress of
the battle. By a little after 1400 the action in the center of the battle was nearly over. Eight French
and Spanish ships had surrendered. In another hour Collingwood’s division had won out in the
rear, and Hardy hastened below to speak to his dying leader. ‘I hope that none of our ships have
struck, Hardy,’ Nelson inquired when Hardy had informed him of the results.
‘No, my Lord, there is no fear of that.’
“Then Hardy was summoned back to the quarterdeck to repulse the counterattack of
Dumanoir, who had by almost superhuman efforts, using his ships’ boats as tugs to help him
around, had come down from the van….”
Ibid.
133. 8:
The Campaign of Trafalgar
.“…the van.Within 20 minutes this attack had failed, and Hardy once again went down to report
to Nelson that 14 or 15 of the enemy had struck. ‘That is well,’ whispered Nelson, ‘but I had
bargained for 20.’ Then Nelson’s seaman’s instinct came to the fore. He could feel from the
motion of the ship that the wind was freshening, and mindful of the crippled condition of the
ships, friend and foe alike, and of the proximity of the dangerous lee shore of Trafalgar, he gave
his last order. ‘Anchor, Hardy, anchor!’2 Then, growing weaker, he begged Hardy not to throw
his body overboard, and with some childhood’s affection, asked Hardy to kiss him. Shortly
afterward he murmured, ‘Thank God I have done my duty. God and my Country.’A moment later
he was dead.•
“About the same time the battle ended. Dumanoir with four ships and the mortally wounded
Gravina with ten pulled out of the fight, leaving the remainder prizes to the British. The Battle of
Trafalgar was over.”
The Battle of Trafalgar
op. cit,, pp. 166-167.
______
2 Collingwood did not see fit to carry out this order. As a result all but five of the prizes were lost in the gale that
sprung up after the battle.•
134.
135. “TRAFALGAR WAS the only major sea battle of the Napoleonic War. It was also the last major
battle under sail, and the most decisive. It did not end Napoleon’s naval ambitions; three
three-decker first rates, an 80-gun ship and six 74s had been laid down for the French service
that year, and over the eight years following the keels for a further fifty-nine French battle
ships would be laid. How much this was a serious naval program, how much an attempt to
break Great Britain financially by forcing her to compete in the building race is not clear.
“Nor, except in the short term, did Trafalgar banish British fears of invasion. Naval
opinion had never taken Napoleon’s plans too solemnly; Pitt’s First Lords were fond of
quoting St Vincent,• ‘I do not say the French will not come; I only say they will not come by
sea.’ Nonetheless a program authorized by Pitt for a chain of ‘Martello tower’ forts • to
command every feasible landing beach along the southern and eastern coasts of England …
went ahead as planned despite Trafalgar, and it was not until these were complete that British
governments felt truly secure… .”
Padfield, Maritime Power, pp. 248-249..
10
Trafalgar, 1805
136.
137. “…truly secure.
“For Spain, Trafalgar did mark the end. Her fifteen of the line in Villeneuve’s fleet were
fought as the French ships were, with great courage against fearsome point-blank fire, but
nine were lost and never replaced….She had never been able to man her magnificent ships
with a full compliment of sailors. Trafalgar not only broke her pretense to major naval status,
but broke her will to pretend….Her fleet withered and the British blockade severed her
trade and communications with her overseas possessions, ruining her already weak
economy and encouraging her American colonies to declare independence—as from
1810 they did. So she finally dropped from the ranks of the great powers….”
op. cit., p. 249.
10
Trafalgar, 1805
138.
139. “…great powers.•
“Trafalgar was equally decisive in the struggle for supremacy between Great Britain and
France.• British naval officers had assumed their service superior to the French—and all
others—since at least the middle 18th century. Trafalgar provided final proof. In terms of the
war it meant that Napoleon could neither break out from continental Europe, nor because of
British commercial and political influence could he subject the continent to his will. His
efforts to resolve this stubborn irregularity drew him into ever more hazardous adventures,
and final disaster. This was the true measure of Trafalgar, and of the British naval dominance
that produced the victory….”
op. cit., p. 249.
10
Trafalgar, 1805
140. “…the victory.
“For Great Britain it meant even freer use of the seas for trade and the transport of troops
and military supplies. Through the rest of the 19th and early 20th centuries French naval
strategists took it as an axiom that after Trafalgar the oceans passed into British
hands.•….Guerrilla attacks by privateers and small squadrons fitted out for the guerre de
course continued, but their depredations were contained; more than ever the creation of
wealth by trade on the high seas proved superior to pillage. In the longer term, for well
over the century during which Great Britain’s trading empire grew to encircle the
world, Trafalgar and Nelson stood as symbols of the invincibility of the Royal Navy.
“In tactical terms the inheritance is far from clear. Nelson’s achievement was to provide
maximum scope for his ships to display their superiority in seamanship and great gunnery.
For this purpose he gave his second in command complete freedom of action after pointing
him in the desired direction and so brought two overwhelming concentrations to bear on two
portions of the enemy line.• He and Collingwood effected this by example, cooly bringing
their flagships into murderous range of the enemy flagships and practically extinguishing
them with their initial raking broadsides….”
10
Trafalgar, 1805
op. cit., p. 249-250..
141. “…raking broadsides. The captains who followed placed their ships with marvelous skill in
the very light breeze off the stern or quarter or bow of their opponents and, crucially,
supported their colleagues. Villeneuve, as a prisoner afterwards in Blackwood’s frigate, said
he had never seen anything like the irresistible line of the British ships. The technical
superiority of flintlock over slow match [for firing the cannons], the speed of loading and
precision of horizontal aim attained in the British ships by continuous drill over months at
sea did the rest [train hard, fight easy]. The wrecked hulls of the French and Spanish vessels,
swept clear of masts, or with only one mast left standing, and the disparity in casualty
figures, some 5,860 against 1,695 in the British fleet—although the French figures included
many later drowned—provide the proof. Only three British ships were totally dismasted,
none was lost….”
10
Trafalgar, 1805
op. cit., p. 250.
142. Battle of Trafalgar — French and Spanish casualty rates by ship in sailing order, up to 84% for Fougueux
143. Battle of Trafalgar British casualty rates by ship, with 19% for Victory leading the weather column and greatest rate 35% for Colossus amidst the lee column
144. “…raking broadsides. The captains who followed placed their ships with marvelous skill in
the very light breeze off the stern or quarter or bow of their opponents and, crucially,
supported their colleagues. Villeneuve, as a prisoner afterwards in Blackwood’s frigate, said
he had never seen anything like the irresistible line of the British ships. The technical
superiority of flintlock over slow match [for firing the cannons], the speed of loading and
precision of horizontal aim attained in the British ships by continuous drill over months at
sea did the rest [train hard, fight easy]. The wrecked hulls of the French and Spanish vessels,
swept clear of masts, or with only one mast left standing, and the disparity in casualty
figures, some 5,860 against 1,695 in the British fleet—although the French figures included
many later drowned—provide the proof. Only three British ships were totally dismasted,
none was lost.
“Yet it is evident that bearing down at a large angle to the enemy exposed the leading
British ships to a destructive fire which they could not subdue with their own broadsides [in
effect, crossing the ’T’ on yourself!] ;…”
10
Trafalgar, 1805
op. cit., p. 250..
145. “…on yourself!] ;. and as Lt. Humphrey Senhouse of the Conquerer, fifth in Nelson’s line,
put it, ‘an enemy of equal spirit and equal ability in gunnery would have annihilated the
ships one after another in detail,’ particularly as they approached so slowly. Both the Victory
and the Royal Sovereign suffered heavy casualties, but many of these were sustained after
they had broken through the line and neither was disabled during the long approach. Then
again, if the enemy had possessed equal skill his van would have tacked directly it became
clear that Nelson had altered course towards Villeneuve in the center. It could then have
doubled the leading group of Nelson’s ships and brought a superior concentration to bear
before his rear ships reached the scene.•
“None of this implies criticism of Nelson’s design. His genius, as Jurien de la Gravure put
it, was to recognize the enemy’s weakness. He adapted his tactics accordingly and had the
nerve to execute them despite the light and fitful wind, and the naked courage to lead down
almost perpendicularly into Villeneuve’s fire until aboard his second astern. It was a rare
fusion of experience, planning, genius and audacity combined with resolution and the
physical bravery he had always displayed….”
op. cit., p. 250-251..
10
Trafalgar, 1805
146. “…always displayed. As such it was unique. Had this form of attack been copied by another
officer commanding a less well-honed fleet or against a more equal enemy, it should have led
to disaster. It might be said • that Duncan had triumphed at Camperdown with just such an
assault in two groups; but Duncan had brought his fleet into line just outside long gunshot,
the wind had been strong, ensuing a swift descent and above all his ships had been
individually more powerfully gunned than those of his Dutch opponents, and had spent a
long time at sea while the Dutch had been blockaded in harbor.• All in all, Nelson’s—and
Duncan’s—tactics were not the culminating achievement of the sailing era, but an anomaly
induced by their enemy’s decline. They were tactics of disdain.”
10
Trafalgar, 1805
Ibid.
The End of the Beginning
With hindsight we know that Britain has won the contest with this smashing victory. But
history has to be lived in the present. Almost a decade of hard fighting stands between
Trafalgar and Waterloo. The RN will fight on.
But that’s another story…
jbp