This document discusses science as a rhetorical enterprise rather than an objective pursuit of facts. It outlines Thomas Kuhn's model of scientific revolutions as an alternative to seeing scientific work as a linear progression of discoveries. The key premises are that scientists aim to gain assent for their claims within their discourse community and that cultural narratives shape how scientists view and operate in their work. Specific rhetorical aspects of Charles Darwin's work are then examined, focusing on how he managed to publish his ideas with the help of supporters who vouched for him.