erer

1. Support to school
governance and
operations

2. MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE
Weight per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Ave SCORE
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
20%
Basic
Education
Services
Support to
school
governance
and
operations
1.To establish a
mechanism for
effective
implementation
of PPAs in the
SDO
*SDO units
adapting the
established
mechanism
*Number of
accomplished
PAPs M & E tool
*Number of
approved DMEA
Report
• Budget
• WFP
January -
December
2024
5 – Operationalized 91-100% of
the established mechanism in the
implementation of the PPAs with
the regular monitoring and
evaluation through the conduct of
PIRPA
91-100% of the (______)
PPAs were implemented by
the 19 sections of the SDO.
PPAs were implemented on
time and PIRPA syntheses
were approved within the time
frame.
4 - Operationalized 81-90% of the
established mechanism in the
implementation of the PPAs with
the regular monitoring and
evaluation through the conduct of
PIRPA
81-90% of the (______)
PPAs were implemented by
the 19 sections of the SDO.
PPAs were implemented on
time and PIRPA syntheses
were approved 1-10 days after
the time frame.
3 - Operationalized 71-80% of the
established mechanism in the
implementation of the PPAs with
the regular monitoring and
evaluation through the conduct of
PIRPA
71-80% of the (______)
PPAs were implemented by
the 19 sections of the SDO.
PPAs were implemented on
time and PIRPA syntheses
were approved 11-20 days
after the frame.
2 - Operationalized 61-70% of the
established mechanism in the
implementation of the PPAs with
the regular monitoring and
evaluation through the conduct of
PIRPA
61-70% of the (______)
PPAs were implemented by
the 19 sections of the SDO.
PPAs were implemented on
time and PIRPA syntheses
were approved 21-30 within
the time frame.
1 - Operationalized 51-60% of the
established mechanism in the
implementation of the PPAs with
the regular monitoring and
evaluation through the conduct of
PIRPA
51-60% of the (______)
PPAs were implemented by
the 19 sections of the SDO.
No PPAs were implemented on
time and No PIRPA syntheses
were approved within the time
frame.

3. MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE
Weight
per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Ave SCORE
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
20%
Basic
Education
Services
Support to
school
governance and
operations
2. To translate
the National
Education
Development Plan
and Regional
Basic Education
Plan (RBEP), and
framework to
operational plan
that is
aligned to the
context and
situation
of the SDO
*Copy of signed and
approved
DEDP
January -
December
2024
5 - Managed the implementation of
the approved DAIP(Division
Annual Implementation Plan) with
91-100% alignment of the PPAs
through the SDO Context.
91-100% (367-403) schools translate
the plans for DAIP(Division
Annual Implementation Plan) ,
and framework through the SDO
Context.
PPAs were approved and
implemented within the
time frame.
4 - Managed the implementation of
the approved DAIP with 81-90%
alignment of the PPAs through the
SDO Context.
81-90% (326-366) schools translate
the plans for DAIP, and framework
through the SDO Context.
PPAs were approved and
implemented 1-10 days
after the time frame.
3 - Managed the implementation of
the approved DAIP with 71-80%
alignment of the PPAs through the
SDO Context.
71-80% (286-325) schools translate
the plans for DAIP(Division Annual
Implementation Plan), and framework
through the SDO Context.
PPAs were approved and
implemented 11-20 days
after the frame.
2 - Managed the implementation of
the approved DAIP with 61-70%
alignment of the PPAs through the
SDO Context.
61-70% (245-285) schools translate
the plans for DAIP(Division Annual
Implementation Plan), and framework
through the SDO Context.
PPAs were approved and
implemented 21-30 within
the time frame.
1 - Managed the 51-70%
implementation of programs
anchored on the National
Education Development Plan and
Regional Basic Education Plan
(RBEP), and framework to
operational plan.
51-60% (206-244) schools translate
the plans for DAIP(Division
Annual Implementation Plan), and
framework through the SDO
Context.
No PPAs were approved and
implemented within the
time frame.

4. MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES MOVs TIME LINE
Weight per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Ave SCORE
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
20%
Basic
Education
Services
Support to
school
governance and
operations
3. To provide
strategic
directions on
support for
school
management and
operations
*Approved OPCRF,
DEDP/SIP/AIP
January -
December
2024
5 – Managed the
crafting of the Division
Annual Implementation
Plan aligned to 9 out of
9 components of BEDP
and MATATAG Agenda.
91-100% of PAPs
based on DAIP were
implemented.
Conducted planned PAPs in
the DAIP on the scheduled
date.
4 - Managed the
crafting of the Division
Annual Implementation
Plan aligned to 8 out of
9 components of BEDP
and MATATAG Agenda.
81-90% of PAPs based
on DAIP were
implemented.
Conducted planned PAPs in
the DAIP 11-20 days after the
scheduled date.
3 - Managed the
crafting of the Division
Annual Implementation
Plan aligned to 7 out of
9 components of BEDP
and MATATAG Agenda.
71-80% of PAPs based
on DAIP were
implemented.
Conducted planned PAPs in
the DAIP 21-30 days after the
scheduled date.
2 - Managed the
crafting of the Division
Annual Implementation
Plan aligned to 6 out of
9 components of BEDP
and MATATAG Agenda.
61-70% of PAPs based
on DAIP were
implemented.
Conducted planned PAPs in
the DAIP 31-40 days after the
scheduled date.
1 - Managed the
crafting of the Division
Annual Implementation
Plan aligned to 5 out of
9 components of BEDP
and MATATAG Agenda.
51-60% of PAPs based
on DAIP were
implemented.
No PPAs were approved and
implemented within the time
frame.
.

5. MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES MOVs TIME LINE
Weight per
KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
Ave SCORE
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
20%
Basic
Education
Services
Support to
school
governance
and
operations
4. To ensure the
operationalization
of
the L&D Systems
in the SDO.
*Number of
approved training
proposals/resour
ce package based
on LDNA reports
*Number of
implemented
programs on
rewards and
incentives for
service excellence
January -
December
2024
5 - Ensured the conduct
L&D programs and systems
and activities evaluated
Outstanding.
91-100% L&D
programs and
activities based on
L&D plan
implemented
Conducted planned L&D
programs and activities on
the scheduled date.
4 - Ensured the conduct
L&D programs and systems
and activities evaluated Very
Satisfactory.
81-90 L&D programs
and activities based
on L&D plan
implemented
Conducted planned L&D
programs and activities 11-
20 days after the scheduled
date.
3 - Ensured the conduct
L&D programs and systems
and activities evaluated
Satisfactory.
71-80% L&D
programs and
activities based on
L&D plan
implemented
Conducted planned planned
L&D programs and activities
21-30 days after the
scheduled date.
2 - Ensured the conduct
L&D programs and systems
and activities evaluated Poor.
61-70% L&D
programs and
activities based on
L&D plan
implemented
Conducted planned L&D
programs and activities 31-
40 days after the scheduled
date.
1 - Ensured the conduct
L&D programs and systems
and activities evaluated
Unsatisfactory.
51-60% L&D
programs and
activities based on
L&D plan
implemented
No L&D Programs and
activities were approved and
implemented within the time
frame.
.