Research 1st Hypothesis Discussion (II)
Abstract
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets is a theater of puppets connecting together by one trajectory of energy through Space
- Space Is Energy
- Space is a medium can't be independent from the moving physical point in it – that means – Space Nature can be effected by a moving particle through it
- Uranus Orbital Distance is created based on light motion for 1 second.
Research 1st hypothesis Discussion
Abstract
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
This is my first and old hypothesis – the solar group is one body and each planet is member of this same body – so solar planets aren't similar but complementary to each other
Any way – the basic point depends on the motion definition – that means – if the solar system is a theater of puppets – as I suggest- where one thread connects all puppets together and push them to move according to each puppet geometrical structure – based on this description- may we have a way to prove this hypothesis
Now we have no escape to avoid the space definition – for that- this paper provides a deep discussion to see the data real direction more than to dictate any conclusions…
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
-The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
-The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
-Because
-The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
-Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
-The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theoryGerges francis
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
The solar system design disproves newton theory (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions For Discussions)Gerges francis
Paper objective
- The paper provides (100) questions without their answers (for discussions) concerning the solar system motion analysis.
- The questions aim to modify the solar system classical description and replace it with a new vision. Whose summary is in following:
- The solar system classical description tells, the solar planets are separated rigid bodies independent from each other in their motions, revolving around the sun by masses gravity forces.
- The new vision tells that,
o The solar group is a machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. the solar group is one creature body and each planet is a member in it. or it's one building and each planet is a part of this same building.
o The solar group is crated based on one geometrical design.
o The planets data is created complementary one another, because of that, there's one equation only controls all solar planets data.
o The complementary meaning can be understood from the double production experiment. While n electron and a positron be created from Gamma ray, the electron and positron charges are crated complementary with each because of the charge reservation law, and the 2 particles move depend on their charges.
o Based on this vision,
o The solar planets motions be cooperated together and create one complementary unified motion. by that, the solar planets move one unified motion similar to the train carriages motion.
o The unified motion necessitates to transport the motion among the solar planets.
o Because the (1 second a period of time) be defined as a function in a planet motion features, so this period (1 second) is different from a planet to another, but the unification of planets motions in one unified motion causes to create one unified rate of time used by the unified motion.
- The questions are provided with different data to support the suggested new vision.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research 1st hypothesis Discussion
Abstract
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
This is my first and old hypothesis – the solar group is one body and each planet is member of this same body – so solar planets aren't similar but complementary to each other
Any way – the basic point depends on the motion definition – that means – if the solar system is a theater of puppets – as I suggest- where one thread connects all puppets together and push them to move according to each puppet geometrical structure – based on this description- may we have a way to prove this hypothesis
Now we have no escape to avoid the space definition – for that- this paper provides a deep discussion to see the data real direction more than to dictate any conclusions…
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
-The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
-The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
-Because
-The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
-Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
-The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theoryGerges francis
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
The solar system design disproves newton theory (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions For Discussions)Gerges francis
Paper objective
- The paper provides (100) questions without their answers (for discussions) concerning the solar system motion analysis.
- The questions aim to modify the solar system classical description and replace it with a new vision. Whose summary is in following:
- The solar system classical description tells, the solar planets are separated rigid bodies independent from each other in their motions, revolving around the sun by masses gravity forces.
- The new vision tells that,
o The solar group is a machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. the solar group is one creature body and each planet is a member in it. or it's one building and each planet is a part of this same building.
o The solar group is crated based on one geometrical design.
o The planets data is created complementary one another, because of that, there's one equation only controls all solar planets data.
o The complementary meaning can be understood from the double production experiment. While n electron and a positron be created from Gamma ray, the electron and positron charges are crated complementary with each because of the charge reservation law, and the 2 particles move depend on their charges.
o Based on this vision,
o The solar planets motions be cooperated together and create one complementary unified motion. by that, the solar planets move one unified motion similar to the train carriages motion.
o The unified motion necessitates to transport the motion among the solar planets.
o Because the (1 second a period of time) be defined as a function in a planet motion features, so this period (1 second) is different from a planet to another, but the unification of planets motions in one unified motion causes to create one unified rate of time used by the unified motion.
- The questions are provided with different data to support the suggested new vision.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun GravityGerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets motions data analysis shows that the planets motions use different rates of time. As a result (for example) 1 h of Mercury motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter motion.
- The planets motions use different rates of time because they revolve their revolutions around the sun in equal periods of time.
- They need to revolve around the sun in equal periods of time because the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion and the equal periods of time is necessary for the planets motions timing adjustments.
- This Vision Is Different From Newton Theory
- Based on that, we have a reason to refute Newton theory of the sun mass gravity.
- The situation is a complex because
- Newton theory is lived since four centuries and has a great effect.
- On the other side, The Planets Motions Data Analysis Shows A Complete Different Vision From Newton Theory And Ideas.
- I have used this paper Introduction to put the theoretical comparison between the 2 visions, trying to make them as clear as possible.
- The Paper Is Divided Into 3 Basic Subjects
- (1st Subject)
- The Theoretical Comparison Between The 2 Visions Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planets Motions Data Analysis – This Comparison Is Provided In This Paper INTRODUCTION. And This Comparison Summarizes The Paper Theoretical Argument
- (2nd Subject)
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis Be Provided In Part No. (I) Of This Paper
- (3rd Subject)
- The Solar Planets Creation Theory Be Provided In Part No. (II) Of This Paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun gravity concept is incorrect (newton was wrong) (revised)Gerges francis
The Sun Gravity Concept is Incorrect (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Don't Move By The Sun Masses Gravity Force.
The Hypothesis Explanation
Newton Was Wrong Because Of The Following Reasons:
- (First Reason)
- The Planets Motions Provide Energy, And This Energy be seen in a clear trajectory shows the real motion trajectory. The energy starts from the inner planets, then transports to Jupiter and from Jupiter to the outer planets till reach to Pluto and then the energy be reflected from Pluto to Neptune and then from Neptune to the inner planets again. This trajectory of energy is defined by directed data and proved the motion trajectory.
- That shows Why Newton is wrong. Because Planet Motion doesn't depend on the sun but depend on another planet motion. by that the solar group is a network connected each point with its neighbor point and by that the line between the sun and the planet has no any effect or role in the planet motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
I suppose that,
The whole solar group is consisted from light beams and these light beams are reflected into Earth Moon Orbit with smaller rate (as the convex mirror), so each light beam is reflected inside the moon orbit in smaller form. Based on that, the moon orbit is consisted of the reflected light beams (Energy),
If this energy is similar to a sea water, so the moon is similar to a paper boat moves on this water. (i.e. the moon is indicator of Energy Passing Process)
This provides us with 2 important conclusions
1. The Moon motion shows all actions and motions in the solar group (as a mirror shows all the room furniture)
2. The Moon motion changes shows greater changes are found in the solar group
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 4)Gerges francis
Solar Group General Principle
Solar Group Geometrical Structure Depends On Energy Of Light Motion For 1 Second Period
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No.1
Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period
Hypothesis No.2
1 second period of light motion causes the planet to move for a solar day period
Hypotheses Explanation
- The whole solar group depends on energy = light beam motion for 1 second only – that means – planets masses, diameters, orbital distances and all other data all of them are created depending the energy of 1 second motion done by light beam
- Light motion for one 1 second period provides energy enough to move the planet for a period = 1 solar day
i.e.
- The Solar Group Building Unit Depends On The Solar Day Period
This paper tries to prove this fact
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The Solar Group Geometrical Basic Features:
1- The Solar Group is One Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is A point on it
2- The sun light is produced by accumulation of planets motions energies and transformation the mechanical waves into light waves
3- Solar Planets Data are created relative to each other
4- There Are relativistic effects in the solar group
5- The unit definition is relative and can change according to the observer situation
This paper discusses and tries to prove the previous features
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun GravityGerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets motions data analysis shows that the planets motions use different rates of time. As a result (for example) 1 h of Mercury motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter motion.
- The planets motions use different rates of time because they revolve their revolutions around the sun in equal periods of time.
- They need to revolve around the sun in equal periods of time because the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion and the equal periods of time is necessary for the planets motions timing adjustments.
- This Vision Is Different From Newton Theory
- Based on that, we have a reason to refute Newton theory of the sun mass gravity.
- The situation is a complex because
- Newton theory is lived since four centuries and has a great effect.
- On the other side, The Planets Motions Data Analysis Shows A Complete Different Vision From Newton Theory And Ideas.
- I have used this paper Introduction to put the theoretical comparison between the 2 visions, trying to make them as clear as possible.
- The Paper Is Divided Into 3 Basic Subjects
- (1st Subject)
- The Theoretical Comparison Between The 2 Visions Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planets Motions Data Analysis – This Comparison Is Provided In This Paper INTRODUCTION. And This Comparison Summarizes The Paper Theoretical Argument
- (2nd Subject)
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis Be Provided In Part No. (I) Of This Paper
- (3rd Subject)
- The Solar Planets Creation Theory Be Provided In Part No. (II) Of This Paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun gravity concept is incorrect (newton was wrong) (revised)Gerges francis
The Sun Gravity Concept is Incorrect (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Don't Move By The Sun Masses Gravity Force.
The Hypothesis Explanation
Newton Was Wrong Because Of The Following Reasons:
- (First Reason)
- The Planets Motions Provide Energy, And This Energy be seen in a clear trajectory shows the real motion trajectory. The energy starts from the inner planets, then transports to Jupiter and from Jupiter to the outer planets till reach to Pluto and then the energy be reflected from Pluto to Neptune and then from Neptune to the inner planets again. This trajectory of energy is defined by directed data and proved the motion trajectory.
- That shows Why Newton is wrong. Because Planet Motion doesn't depend on the sun but depend on another planet motion. by that the solar group is a network connected each point with its neighbor point and by that the line between the sun and the planet has no any effect or role in the planet motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
I suppose that,
The whole solar group is consisted from light beams and these light beams are reflected into Earth Moon Orbit with smaller rate (as the convex mirror), so each light beam is reflected inside the moon orbit in smaller form. Based on that, the moon orbit is consisted of the reflected light beams (Energy),
If this energy is similar to a sea water, so the moon is similar to a paper boat moves on this water. (i.e. the moon is indicator of Energy Passing Process)
This provides us with 2 important conclusions
1. The Moon motion shows all actions and motions in the solar group (as a mirror shows all the room furniture)
2. The Moon motion changes shows greater changes are found in the solar group
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 4)Gerges francis
Solar Group General Principle
Solar Group Geometrical Structure Depends On Energy Of Light Motion For 1 Second Period
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No.1
Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period
Hypothesis No.2
1 second period of light motion causes the planet to move for a solar day period
Hypotheses Explanation
- The whole solar group depends on energy = light beam motion for 1 second only – that means – planets masses, diameters, orbital distances and all other data all of them are created depending the energy of 1 second motion done by light beam
- Light motion for one 1 second period provides energy enough to move the planet for a period = 1 solar day
i.e.
- The Solar Group Building Unit Depends On The Solar Day Period
This paper tries to prove this fact
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The Solar Group Geometrical Basic Features:
1- The Solar Group is One Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is A point on it
2- The sun light is produced by accumulation of planets motions energies and transformation the mechanical waves into light waves
3- Solar Planets Data are created relative to each other
4- There Are relativistic effects in the solar group
5- The unit definition is relative and can change according to the observer situation
This paper discusses and tries to prove the previous features
Paper Hypotheses
(I)
2737 is A Real Astronomical Phenomenon
(II)
2737 cycle depends on Pluto Motion Concept
(III)
2737 Cycle is effected by Uranus Motion
Pluto Motion Concept (Revision)
- Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second only
- This light motion energy causes a planet to move for 1 solar day
- (Specifically) Light Motion for 1 second causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
- Pluto motion for 1 solar day causes Solar Planets Creation Process
- Pluto moves -during a solar day- a distance = 406000 km
- That's why Pluto Motion Daily =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
Based on this description …
A = (light motion for 1 second) /(Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
Conclusion
The Rate (A=2.8571) Controls Solar Group Basic Data
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
Precession Cycle Effect
Earth orbital distance =149.6 mkm – the light (0.3mkm/sec) needs around 500 seconds to pass this distance… Why?
Paper Hypotheses
Because
(1) Solar Group is one Trajectory of Energy – through which the Energy transports from point to another
(2) Pluto sends The Energy To Earth
(3) Pluto motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(4) Earth motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =0.3 mkm/sec
(5) The period 500 seconds is sent with Pluto energy to Earth
(6) The sending energy causes Pluto and Earth data harmony
The paper tries to prove these facts
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass GravityGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Earth Be Found Before The Sun Creation
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, The Earth is Older Than The Sun
- The ages question provides an essential modification for the physics basic theories,
- Because,
- If Earth be found and moving before the sun creation, that disproves clearly and decisively Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- As a result, Earth and all other solar planets must move by a force different from the sun mass gravity.
- But, how to prove that, the Earth is older than the sun? The event be found before millions of years!
- Because the sun circles Earth and gives it one face only, that may prove the sun data be created depending on Earth orbital period (365.25 days) which proves that the sun must be created after the Earth creation.
Paper Objective
- The paper analyzes Earth orbital period to know Why The Sun Circles Earth.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
Planet Velocity shows, Planet Motion is a part of A Greater Motion-
(2)
Planet Velocity shows, Planets motions are similar to a train motion- it's one unified motion – and as a train moves with its carriages – the solar system moves one general motion with all planets. ("Train Motion Concept")
(3)
Planets different velocities can't disprove "Train Motion Concept".
(4)
Space is NOT nothingness but a geometrical player in the solar system geometry
(5)
Space & Matter are created relative (and complementary) to each other
Solar System Motion Analysis (I)
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No. (1)
"Solar System has One Unified Motion-
i.e.
All Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion"
This motion is similar to a train motion –as the train moves with all carriages together
The Solar System moves With All Planets Together One Unified General Motion. Although the Planets Velocities are different from each other – that can't disprove the hypothesis – where we see simply in any machine of gears how the gears move with different velocities but all gears together produce one general cooperative motion.
Hypothesis No. (2)
Energy is transported Through the Solar system
Resulting of Solar System Energy Transportation
(1) Planets data is created
(2) Planets Motions became one unified motion
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry Gerges francis
Paper Hypotheses
(I) Light Velocity
1- There are 2 light velocities work in the solar system. Which are light known velocity (= 0.3mkm/sec) and light supposed velocity (=1.16 mkm/sec)
2- Light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) creates the distance by its motion (where Space = Energy) –
3- Planet Matter is created from the distance energy – that explains the relationship between Planet Matter (diameter or mass) with its orbital distance
4- Planet Matter is created from distance energy (Space =Energy) by relativistic effects help (specifically based on length contraction effect the distance energy give a birth for a matter)
5- Matter is relative to Light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec), (equation E=mc2 supports that). That's why our 5 senses (material senses) can't discover or realize any other light velocity than the known one (0.3mkm/sec) – and that's why the light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) is the highest in our universe (Matter Universe)
6- Means… the light supposed velocity (1.16mkm/sec) is always around us but we can neither discover nor realize it because our senses are limited to the known one (0.3 mkm/sec)
7- Light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) is produced from the original one (1.16 mkm/sec)
(II) Energy Transportation
8- The Solar Group is created from one energy- this energy (light with supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) creates Planets matters, orbital distances and the light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec)
9- The solar group is one trajectory of energy – and each planet is a point on this same trajectory –
10- That means the Energy is transported from point to another point through the solar system – and that explains Planets Data Dependency where all solar planets data is created relative to each other because they are created from one source (one energy)
11- Energy Transportation process should be a crucial proof for this theory –in this paper we should follow energy transportation process details to prove it.
Primary Conclusion
All Solar Planets Data Is Controlled By One Equation Only
Because all planets data is created relative to each – where all data is created from the same source (the same energy) –
i.e.
All data is relative to each other and one Equation only controls all of them –
i.e.
(If I know this Equation and I know just Earth Diameter – as example-, based on this Equation I can conclude Uranus diameter, Mars axial tilt or even Pluto mass…. Any other data I can conclude this equation)
In this Paper we follow the Energy Transportation process to prove it's a fact
Also the paper tries to prove all previous hypotheses
Definition Of Motion (III)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar System Motion
1- Light travels before any other motion – because by this light motion energy the solar system moves.
2- Solar planets motions are followers the leading light motion
3- Light Motion is One and Planets Motions is One
i.e.
4- Solar Planets cooperate together to produce one unified motion
5- Planets Data proves that solar system moves one unified motion by all planets – as a train moves with all carriages together- (Planet = A Train Carriage)
Also
Solar System has relativistic effects which prove the one motion claim
Because
(1) All distances are contracted by the same rate which means there's One Unified Motion Behind
(2) the contraction rate is transported from point to another which proves the energy transportation through the solar system, makes it as one Trajectory of Energy.
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbitGerges francis
1- Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit
2- The Sun Also Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (The Sun And Uranus Are On The Same Horizontal Level)
3- The Rest Planets Are Found On Stair Steps Relative To Each Other – (Graduated Horizontal Levels).
4- The Solar Planets revolve around the perpendicular line from the Sun to Earth.
5- The Solar Planets doesn't revolve around the sun herself.
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Paper Hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels from Pluto to Earth Axis which creates the connection between Pluto on one side and Earth with her Moon on the other Side
Based on this connection Pluto and the Moon orbit effect on Solar Planets Creation Process
This hypothesis depends on
Solar System General Principle
-Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light beam motion (its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) for one second period
-Light motion (1.16 mkm/sec) for 1 second period causes Planet to move for 1 solar day..
Similar to Research 1st Hypothesis Discussion (II) (20)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Research 1st Hypothesis Discussion (II)
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Research 1st hypothesis Discussion (II)
Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
Course Student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com / georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Abstract
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.1111
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of
this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets is a theater of puppets connecting together by one trajectory of
energy through Space
- Space Is Energy
- Space is a medium can't be independent from the moving physical point in it –
that means – Space Nature can be effected by a moving particle through it
- Uranus Orbital Distance is created based on light motion for 1 second.
References
My Research hypotheses http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0406
Research 1st hypothesis Discussion http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0562
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary.
Written in Cairo – Egypt
29th
September 2019 (S. George)
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Paper Contents
Subject Page
Abstract 1
Content 2
1- Introduction 3
2- Methodology 4
3- Solar System moves As A Train 6
4- Space Definition and Creation 10
5- Earth Moon Motion Discussion 25
6- Earth Saturn relationship effect on Pluto Data 29
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
1-Introduction
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
Research 1st
Hypothesis Discussion http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0562
1st
Hypothesis tells that – Solar Group is one building (or one machine of gears) and
each planet is a part of this same building – this is the main and oldest hypothesis in
my research and I provide a short description for it with paper methodology
Any way – this hypothesis gives 2 extending points – the first is how the space
prevents or allows the solar planets integration and unification- in this point we
discuss Space Definition and Creation – as I have referred in Paper Abstract
The second point is that – what the most simple proof for this claim?
If the solar system is one machine –the most near idea is - this machine moves one
motion – One Unified Motion -
i.e.
The Solar Planets are puppets in the puppets theater and there's one great force
(energy) causes all these puppets to move together as one train
Means
Solar planets are carriages in one train and this train moves with all carriages together
This idea is discussed in my research 2nd
hypothesis –
HypotheHypotheHypotheHypothesis No.sis No.sis No.sis No.2222
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together,
similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion
i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions
(I call this idea "Train Motion Concept")
i.e.
To prove research 1st
hypothesis we have to review the 2nd
hypothesis because it's the
most simple method to prove the claim
That's why we review the 2nd
hypothesis in Point no.3 of this paper before to start our
discussion to define the space and discover how it's created.
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
2- Methodology(Methodology In Repeated In All My Papers)
Planetary Fact Sheet – Metric
MERCUR
Y
VENUS EARTH MOON MARS JUPITER SATURN URANUS NEPTUNE PLUTO
Mass (1024
kg) 0.330 4.87 5.97 0.073 0.642 1898 568 86.8 102 0.0146
Diameter (km) 4879 12,104 12,756 3475 6792 142,984 120,536 51,118 49,528 2370
Density (kg/m3
) 5427 5243 5514 3340 3933 1326 687 1271 1638 2095
Gravity (m/s2
) 3.7 8.9 9.8 1.6 3.7 23.1 9.0 8.7 11.0 0.7
Escape
Velocity (km/s)
4.3 10.4 11.2 2.4 5.0 59.5 35.5 21.3 23.5 1.3
Rotation
Period (hours)
1407.6 -5832.5 23.9 655.7 24.6 9.9 10.7 -17.2 16.1 -153.3
Length of
Day (hours)
4222.6 2802.0 24.0 708.7 24.7 9.9 10.7 17.2 16.1 153.3
Distance from
Sun (106
km)
57.9 108.2 149.6 0.384* 227.9 778.6 1433.5 2872.5 4495.1 5906.4
Perihelion (106
k
m)
46.0 107.5 147.1 0.363* 206.6 740.5 1352.6 2741.3 4444.5 4436.8
Aphelion (106
km) 69.8 108.9 152.1 0.406* 249.2 816.6 1514.5 3003.6 4545.7 7375.9
Orbital
Period (days)
88.0 224.7 365.2 27.3 687.0 4331 10,747 30,589 59,800 90,560
Orbital
Velocity (km/s)
47.4 35.0 29.8 1.0 24.1 13.1 9.7 6.8 5.4 4.7
Orbital
Inclination (degrees)
7.0 3.4 0.0 5.1 1.9 1.3 2.5 0.8 1.8 17.2
Orbital
Eccentricity
0.205 0.007 0.017 0.055 0.094 0.049 0.057 0.046 0.011 0.244
Obliquity to
Orbit (degrees)
0.034 177.4 23.4 6.7 25.2 3.1 26.7 97.8 28.3 122.5
Mean
Temperature (C)
167 464 15 -20 -65 -110 -140 -195 -200 -225
Surface
Pressure (bars)
0 92 1 0 0.01 Unknown*
Unknown
*
Unknown* Unknown* 0.00001
Number of Moons 0 0 1 0 2 79 62 27 14 5
Ring System? No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Global Magnetic
Field?
Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Unknow
n
MERCUR
Y
VENUS EARTH MOON MARS JUPITER SATURN URANUS NEPTUNE PLUTO
https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/
The previous table is Nasa Planetary Fact Sheet – Metric – it's the only source I use for
Solar Planets Data
1. I analyze Solar Planets Data to reach the geometrical rules on which this data is created
– for example – If we have a right triangle its dimensions 3,4 and 5, can we use these
dimensions to conclude the Pythagoras rule? Yes we can – similar to that I analyze the
planets data to reach their geometrical rules
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
2. I depend on Data Direction
This equation is hard to explain – but what's the basic idea here? There's a dependency
between these 4 planets axial tilts… this conclusion is the Data Direction
3. I suppose there's one Equation only controls all solar planets data – that means – the
previous table is controlled by one Equation only…(my Basic Hypothesis)
To explain this hypothesis I provide the following solar system alternative description –
which is a part of my methodology…
Solar System alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same
trajectory…….
i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also the solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also the solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
means
6- When a planet moves –it doesn't mean this planet moves individually and independently
from the other planets- NOT TRUE – Planet moves with all other planets together as a
train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets Cooperation And Integration Is The Reason Of Their Existence
And Motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2
) – but How The Space Is Created? I
suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Based on that the solar
group can be one trajectory of Energy
Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and
dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input
is used (light)– the outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates planet matter and orbital distance – so this
same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital
distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to
each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are
created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data
analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
0725.1
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailNeptune28.3
tiltaxailMars25.2
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailEarth23.4
tiltaxailMars25.2
===
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
3- Solar System moves As A Train (2nd
Hypothesis)
3-1 Research hypotheses (Short Revision)
3-2 "Train Motion Concept" Explanation
3-1 Research hypotheses (Short Revision)
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.1111
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of
this same building.
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.2222
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together,
similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion
i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions
(I call this idea "Train Motion Concept")
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.3333
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1
second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. –
Planet motion shows double motions – (1st
) Light Motion (2nd
) Its
Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.4444
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.5555
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means
– Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main
components
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
3-2 "Train Motion Concept" Explanation
Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.Hypothesis No.2222
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together,
similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion
i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions
(I call this idea "Train Motion Concept")
Preface
We have discussed this hypothesis frequently before – it's important and clear idea
which can prove easily that – the solar system is one building and each planet is a
part of it
My claim is clear
The current description tells that – each planet moves independently from others
My idea contradicts this concept
I suppose the solar planets are carriages in one train – the train moves and all
carriages move together
Not necessary for all carriages to move by the same velocity – because – as in any
machine of gears – the gears move by different velocities but only one motion is
transported from gear to another which is considered the whole machine unified
motion.
This idea doesn't contradicts kepler laws – because – for example - kepler told that –
each planet motion trajectory is an ellipse – it's correct – because the motion is one –
the form is similar
Kepler all laws can be used by this same description
Also
All planets revolve around the sun in the same direction – this fact also supports the
claim
Now
There's no proof that – each solar planet moves independently from others motions –
but there are many features and data can prove strongly that solar planets motions
almost are depending on each other which supports "The Train Motion Concept"
We have discussed many of this data before and there's no room for this discussion
here – I will add just 2 proves in the next point (3-2) as examples for many other
proves we have discussed in my previous paper
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion
http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0135
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
(I) Earth & Moon Motions supports "The Train Motion Concept"
I-Data
1. Earth daily moves a distance =2.58 mkm = 0.985 degrees to complete 360 degrees
in 365.25 days… i.e. Earth during 29.53 days move 29.2 degrees
And
2. The moon moves daily 2.58 mkm but the moon during the day moves 13.18
degrees to perform 360 degrees during 27.3 days
Means
- The moon during 29.53 days move a distance = 389.2 degrees
- 389.2 degrees – 360 degrees = 29.2 degrees
Why 29.2 degrees is equal in both motions?
II- More Data
Metonic Cycle Period 6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (Sidereal Days)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Lunar Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
Saros Cycle Period 6585.321 days = 241 x 27.32 days (Lunar Sidereal Month)
= 19 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 223 x 29.53 days (Lunar Synodic Month)
Why motions of Earth, Moon and Moon orbit regression are in harmony as the data
shows? Why these 3 cycles are in such harmony?
II-Discussion
The Data is clear before our eyes
We have 3 motions (Earth, moon and moon orbit regression)
And these three motions are in clear harmony as Metonic and Saros Cycles show
With some analysis – we see that – Earth Motion degrees corresponds with Moon
motion degrees
That tells simply
The motion formation process is in harmony and for that the motion cycles also be in
harmony
Simply these 3 motions must be integrated to produce One Motion only
Earth, Moon and moon orbit - these 3 players are moving depending on each other
This conclusion supports clearly "The Train Motion Concept"
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
(II) Planet Velocity Analysis
I-Data
Group No. 1
Equation No. 1
Equation No. 2
Equation No. 3
Equation No.4
Note Please (1.16)2
=1.345 and 1.345 = 1.0725 x 1.254 (where 1.0725 we know clearly)
Group No. 2
No.5
Mercury Velocity daily 4.095 mkm x Ceres Velocity Daily 1.5434 mkm = 2π mkm2
No.6
Venus Velocity daily 3.02 mkm x Mars Velocity Daily 2.082 mkm = 2π mkm2
No.7
Earth Velocity daily 2.58 mkm x Moon Velocity Daily 2.082 mkm = 2π mkm2
Group No. 3
No.8
Mars Velocity Daily 2.082 mkm = 1/ (Neptune Velocity Daily 0.4665mkm)
No.9
Moon Velocity Daily 2.41 mkm = 1/ (Pluto Velocity Daily 0.406 mkm)
No.10
Earth Velocity Daily 2.58 mkm = Pluto Velocity Daily 0.406 mkm x 2π
I-Discussion
We have discussed this data before frequently –
Planet velocity – based on the previous analysis – can't be created independently from other
planets velocities – simply we deal with one machine and these planets are its gears –where
the motion is transported from point to another through the solar system
The data clearly supports "The Train Motion Concept"
For detailed discussion please review
Solar Planet Velocity Analysis (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0361
16.1
km/s4.7VelocityPLuto
km/s5.4VelocityNeptune
km/s24.1VelocityMars
km/s27.9VelocityMoon
km/s29.8VelocityEarth
km/s35VelocityVenus
===
345.1
km/s9.7VelocitySaturn
km/s13.1VelocityJupiter
km/s13.1VelocityJupiter
km/s17.8VelocityCeres
km/s17.8VelocityCeres
km/s24.1VelocityMars
km/s35VelocityVenus
km/s47.4VelocityMercury
====
254.1
km/s5.4VelocityNeptune
km/s6.8VelocityUranus
km/s27.9VelocityMoon
km/s35VelocityVenus
km/s24.1VelocityMars
km/s29.8VelocityEarth
===
6.3
km/s6.8VelocityUranus
km/s24.1VelocityMars
km/s9.7VelocitySaturn
km/s35VelocityVenus
km/s13.1VelocityJupiter
km/s47.4VelocityMercury
===
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
4-Space Definition and Creation
4-1 Previous Paper Conclusion Revision
4-2 Space Main Equation (90000mkm = 2872.5 mkm x π3
)
4-3 Solar System Main Equation (Z= 2X +1 Y)
4-1 Previous Paper Conclusion Revision
The previous paper argued that – if the solar system is one machine moves as one
train with all carriages
So must be there's one velocity for this system motion
So
It supposed that Saturn orbital distance =1433.5 mkm is the required distance which
the solar system (all solar planets together) have to pass per solar day (86400 seconds)
So the velocity = 1433.5 million km /86400 seconds = 16591.5 km /second
But
Solar planets velocities total per second =204 km /sec
i.e.
16591.5 km = 204 km x 81.3
511.1 degrees = 2π x 81.3 degrees (where 511.1 degrees= Planets Axial Tilts Total)
Please Note
In Research 1st
hypothesis Discussion (I) (http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0562) – I did a
mistake and didn't write the rate 2π Please forgive my inadvertence
Conclusion
The supposed velocity =16591.5km/sec but the real velocity 204 km where the rate
between both is (511/2π) – then I have concluded that – the velocity 204 km/sec is
created depending on the velocity 16591.5 km by help of Planets Axial Tilts Total
Based on that I have accepted the hypothesis as a fact –
But
This discussion was short because I wanted to prove the data direction and had to add
more data to support it – so the theoretical discussion was short as possible – and
even somehow unclear
In current paper – we need to see the theoretical reasoning of this process – simply –
to see if the solar planets velocities total can be considered as one value only – and if
this value can effect on the solar system geometrical structure
No clear start point more than the Space Main Equation which we have discussed
shortly in that paper- let's review this equation and see what depth it can moves to
(Note Please – in solar planets velocities total =204 km/sec – I added Earth Moon
velocity = Earth Velocity- that because the moon has to move by velocity = Earth
velocity otherwise they will be separated)
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
4-2 Space Main Equation
I-Data
90000 mkm = π3
x 2872.5 mkm (Uranus Orbital Distance)
II-Discussion
What's the idea behind this equation?
The space is created (firstly) as a distance =2872.5 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance
This is the 1st
created distance …! Let's review the idea in following
(I)
Light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec travels during 1 second a distance =0.3mkm=C
But C2
= (0.3mkm/sec)2
= 0.32
/sec2
If time = 1 second so sec2
=1 …………………C2
= 90000 mkm2
So we see a distance =90000 mkm but this value is equivalent to C2
(Note Please/ 90000 mkm is a rectangle its length =90000 km, its breadth =1 mkm)
(II)
π3
= (Uranus Axial Tilt 97.8 degrees / Jupiter Axial Tilt 3.1 degrees)
So C2
depending on π3
produces Uranus Orbital Distance 2872.5 mkm – and because
90000mkm = C2
for 1 SECOND – because of that – Uranus orbital distance 2872.5 mkm =
Space is produced for 1 second (from Light Motion Vision) (Note Uranus orbital distance
and axial tilt are my idea origin)
(III)
But we know light motion for 1 second causes solar planets motion for 1 solar day
(3rd
Hypothesis)
That means ……….2872.5 mkm Is Produced Space For 1 Solar Day (I)
But we know that
Saturn Orbital Distance Is The Required Distance To Be Passed By The Solar
System During One Solar Day (II)
How to understand that??
We have one motion (solar system motion) during one specific period of time (solar
day period) – and this motion produces 2 Different Distances!! How that?
There's an answer for this question – that – there's a gear found between these 2
distances – which causes to create one Distance Depending On The Other
Shortly
Earth Moon Motion uses Uranus Orbital Distance 2872.5 mkm and produce
Saturn orbital distance 1433.5 mkm (or vice versa) where Earth Moon works as
a gear between these 2 planets!!
Is it a sufficient answer?! How the moon can do this effect on 2 great planets at great
distances?! But if someone thinks we swims in dreams – he may review the Cycle 2737
years in which Saturn himself (a great planet) follows Earth Moon Motion Trajectory
and be perpendicular in Earth- which is an astronomical phenomenon (Proof)
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one? (II) http://vixra.org/abs/1908.0583
But the answer tells no explanation what's going here – we need to see the geometrical
depth based on which these relationships were created and by what mechanism (to some
extent) such great process can be done – let's discuss that in following…
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
7.14
Diameter)(Plutokm2390
2)Diameter x(Satrunmkm0.241
Dis)Orbital(Mercurymkm57.9
Dis)Orbital(Plutomkm5906
Daily)Velcoity(PLutomkm0.406
Dis)Venus(Earthmkm41.4
===
7.14
0.3mkm
nce)CircumfereSun(themkm4.37
Diameter)(Uranus51118km
nce)Circumfere(Saturnmkm0.377
Diameter)(Moonkm3475
Diameter)(Uranuskm51118
===
4-2-1 Why Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distance?
I-Data
Group No.1
- Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
- Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mercury Orbital Circumference
= Saturn Uranus Distance
= Pluto Eccentricity Distance
More Data
- Mercury Jupiter Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π
- Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Distance x π
- Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Distance x π
- Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Distance x π
- Uranus Pluto Distance = Earth Orb. Circumference x π
- Neptune Orb. Distance = Saturn Orb. Distance x π
- Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orb. Circumference x π
Group No.2
(1)
(2)
2 Jupiter Circumferences - 2 Saturn Circumferences = 1 Jupiter Diameter (error 1.3%)
(3)
(Jupiter Diameter)2
+ (Saturn Diameter)2
= 0.5 (Saturn Circumference)2
(1.2%)
(4)
2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total (No Error)
(5)
Saturn Diameter – Jupiter Radius = Neptune Diameter x 0.99 (No Error)
Group No.3
Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds =84 minutes to be 176 solar days
During 5040 seconds
- Mercury moves a distance = 2 Saturn Diameter
- Mars moves a distance = Saturn Diameter
- Saturn moves a distance = Neptune Diameter x0.99
- Pluto moves a distance = Pluto Diameter x π2
Group No.4
12
2
km120536diameterSaturn
km142984diameterJupiter
−
=
π
π
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
I-Discussion
It's just a simple question – why Uranus orbital distance = 2 Saturn orbital distance?
Why to answer we need all this data?!
Data group No. 1
Data tells that the distances equality is not limited to Uranus and Saturn orbital
distances but it contains many other distances – as we see –but – the great part of
equal distances depend on Saturn Orbital Distance- Why??
Data group No. 2
Data tells that – all equations use double values – that means – the double value using
is one of the solar system geometrical features
For example
(5)
Saturn Diameter – Jupiter Radius = Neptune Diameter x 0.99
The equation tells that
2 Saturn diameters should be used because Jupiter uses its radius and not diameter
That means ….the double using isn't created by any pure coincidence but based on
geometrical reasons…
Data group No.3
(Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds =84 minutes to be 176 solar days)
Data tells us some complex puzzle – Mercury moves a distance = 2 Saturn Diameters
during 5040 seconds!! Why?
Pluto during 5040 seconds moves a distance = Pluto diameter x π2
What geometrical role is done by this value π2
? The geometrical mechanism is still
unclear – my hard job depends on the values using discovery
π2
is used frequently in the solar group –
For example
The sun diameter = Jupiter diameter x π2
Saturn Diameter = Venus diameter x π2
These 2 equations are important because – as we see in group no.2 –that
Solar planets diameters total = 2 Jupiter diameters +1 Saturn diameter
What we understood from these 3 groups of Data? Why we need them here?
Conclusion
The solar system is created based on a geometrical mechanism – this mechanism uses
2 B (double value of variable B) to produce 1A (one value of veritable A)
We know that from The Solar System Main Equation is created – we remember it
Z = 2 x +1 y
Why Uranus Orbital distance = 2 Saturn orbital distance? Because both are used in
this equation…
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
7.14
Diameter)(Plutokm2390
2)Diameter x(Satrunmkm0.241
Dis)Orbital(Mercurymkm57.9
Dis)Orbital(Plutomkm5906
Daily)Velcoity(PLutomkm0.406
Dis)Venus(Earthmkm41.4
===
7.14
0.3mkm
nce)CircumfereSun(themkm4.37
Diameter)(Uranus51118km
nce)Circumfere(Saturnmkm0.377
Diameter)(Moonkm3475
Diameter)(Uranuskm51118
===
Group No. 4
This discussion aims basically to discuss the 2 equations of Group No. 4 –let's do it
(I)
(II)
Equation (I)
0.241 mkm =2 Saturn diameters = a distance passed by Mercury during 5040 seconds
2390 km = Pluto diameter = a distance passed by Pluto during 5040 seconds /π2
(0.241 mkm/2390 km) =( 5906 mkm Pluto orb. dis/57.9 Mercury orb. dis) =14.7
What does this equation tell us?
Mercury motion during 5040 (s) divided by Pluto motion during 5040 (s) = a rate
defines the distance between Pluto and Mercury
Why?
Why their motions during 5040 seconds – defines the distance between them?!
More Data
1.16 mkm/sec (light supposed velocity) x 5040 seconds = 5846.4 mkm (Mercury
Pluto Distance)
How to understand this equation??
The distance between Mercury and Pluto is defined by light motion
Mercury and Pluto data are created based on this fact– for that – their data shows the
light motion effect on their orbital distances
It's another vision concerns the solar system
Solar planets are puppets in puppets theater – one trajectory of energy connects all of
them together – and causes all of them to move together as carriages of one train –
now planets velocities are different from each other because of their geometrical
structure difference –
So light motion is a companion to planet motion
that makes the solar system geometry study more clear & more complex in the same
time.
Conclusion
Mercury Pluto Distance depends on light motion during 5040 seconds – means – light
motion is a companion to planet motion – Planet & Light move together but with
different rates of time
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
More Discussion
What does mean Different Rate of time?
5040 seconds – this period is used by light velocity to produce 5846.5 mkm (Mercury
Pluto Distance)
What 's the other rate of time??
The period 5040 seconds can be used as 5040 minutes, 5040 hours or even 5040 days
The unit choice depends on the solar system geometrical necessities
Let's use one example only …
Example
The value can be used as 5040 minutes – as in following
5040 minutes x 0.99 = 4989.6 minutes
4989.6 minutes x 60 = 299376 seconds
299376 seconds x 0.3mkm/sec = 89813 mkm
89813 mkm – 86400 mkm = 3413 mkm
(i.e. Light passes a distance =89813 mkm during 4989.6 minutes-the reflected energy
from Jupiter = 86400 km- so the difference =3413 mkm )
Now we know this Value 3413 mkm
Where
3413 mkm = 360 mkm (Mercury Orbital Circumference) +680 mkm (Venus Orbital
Circumference) +940 mkm (Earth Orbital Circumference) +1433.5 mkm (Mars
Orbital Circumference)
i.e.
3413 mkm = Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
If We add only 1433.5 mkm (Mars orbital circumference) (again) +3413 mkm = 4900
mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
Why? What geometrical mechanism behind these values? I still search – but the data
tells that the value 5040 minutes is used as equal to the original one 5040 seconds
I wish to explain my idea as clear as possible
The solar system (solar group) is one building (one body) and each planet is a part of
this same building- now these planets are connected to each other through the space
to form one great machine (One Train) – and so the solar plants move together – the
connection between the solar planets depends on the geometrical necessities which
are created based on the integration concept…
Each planet is a complementary to another (as positron is complementary to electron
and both of them together create a gamma rays 1.2 Mev)- so the connection can be
changed from one planet to another according to each planet job in the solar system
and the planet geometrical structure –
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
But the solar system is strong system and built based on deep geometrical necessities
– for that reason – the connection between any 2 planets is a deep connection and
strong relationship –
The basic difficulty is that – we don't know the geometrical rules on which the solar
system are created – how the second period can be used as minute period? Also can
Time & Distance Values be equivalent??
(Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125 )
So to explain clearly how these connections work we need to know all geometrical
rules used in the solar system geometry –where the supposition that – we already
know them – this supposition is almost disproved frequently in our discussions
Spite of that- I can explain how 1 solar day motion can be 1 second motion
1 Solar Day Motion Is Transformed Into 1 Second Motion:
Shortly
To understand correctly the solar system we have to define 3 expressions as clear as
possible which are
(1) What's the time?
(2) What's the space and how to create it?
(3) How the matter is created?
These 3 questions contain inside hundreds of puzzled question which we can't solve
and have no source of knowledge to help us
What I'm doing here is that – I analyze Planets data as deep as possible to see what
physical or geometrical concepts can create such data – based on this analysis – I
show Data can be source of knowledge to discover solutions for these 3 questions and
the hundreds puzzles related to them
Now before to start the 1 second and 1 solar day discussion in the next point we have
to complete our Equation discussion
Let's see Equation no (II) in following
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
7.14
0.3mkm
nce)CircumfereSun(themkm4.37
Diameter)(Uranus51118km
nce)Circumfere(Saturnmkm0.377
Diameter)(Moonkm3475
Diameter)(Uranuskm51118
===
Equation (II)
Please Note
The rate 14.7 is the same in both equations – they are one equation – but I can't write
it in one line – so I have to divide it into 2 parts
Also there are many other values can be added to these equations – such as
(Uranus Mass / Earth Mass) = 14.7
(Jupiter Radius / Mercury Diameter) = 14.7
(511.1 degrees /17.4 degrees) = 14.7 x 2
Where (511.1 degrees = Solar Planets Axial Tilts Total and 17.4 degrees = Inner Planets
Orbital Inclinations Total) (please not – the value 2 means we need 2 values of 17.4 degrees
to produce the value 511.1 degrees which follow the solar system main equation Z =2X +1
Y which we will discuss later)
What does Equation (II) tell us?
We have 3 players in it which are Saturn circumference – Uranus diameter and Earth
moon diameter –
Simply this is my claim – let's remember the question –
Why Uranus orbital distance = 2 x Saturn orbital distance ??
Because Earth moon works as a gear between these 2 planets (Saturn and Uranus)
and the moon as a gear transports the motion with 1/2 rate (which we will explain
later) – so Uranus Orbital distance 2872.5 mkm will be transported by the moon to
Saturn in half value only to be 1433.5 mkm – which causes Saturn Orbital Distance =
Saturn Uranus Distance
So in this story the players are – Uranus , Saturn and the moon –
Also in Equation (II) these are the same players (Uranus – Saturn and Earth Moon)
The data supports the direction clearly
So we have some confidence that – the claim may be supported – and we should wait
till discuss it clearly to see why and how the moon transports the motion based on it's
rate of motion (1/2 half value)
But the equation still has a great secret – it's the sun equation
(The Sun Circumference 4.37 mkm / 0.3mkm) =14.7
By the same rate the sun Circumference is related to light known velocity motion for
1 second.
I wish we see our orchestra plays the same song –
1 second for light motion (for 0.3mkm/sec and 1.16 mk/sec….)
1 day for planet motion (all solar planets)
But why the sun circumference depends on light motion (0.3mkm/sec) for 1 second?
this question need to wait till we discuss the sun rays origin later in this paper
Please Note: Mercury Pluto Relationship –again – defines the previous data –
supporting the deep relationship between both.
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
4 -2-2 How 1 second of light motion can cause planet motion for 1 solar day
To generalize our question …. We have to ask
Are there many rates of time in the solar system? Yes …..Why?
Because there are 3 types of velocities pass through the solar system which are:
(1) Light velocity 1.16 mkm/sec (Supposed Velocity)
(2) Light velocity 0.3 mkm/sec (Known Velocity)
(3) Solar system velocity (16591.5 km/sec) (low velocity)
3 types of velocities create relativistic effects between each other which causes the
different rates of time
Accordingly we have 3 rates of time which are:
(1st
) Solar Day = 86400 seconds
(2nd
) The Sun Day = 365.25 solar days
(3rd
) Light one Second = one Solar Day =86400 seconds
Let's try to prove that in following
(3rd
) Light rate of time
Light one Second = one Solar Day =86400 seconds
How that can be possible? To answer we have to accept the following
(1)
Time and distance values can be equivalent in higher velocity –
that depends on the equation x =ct where c= light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec
distance will be equivalent to time if C=1
we suppose that C=1
So we accept firstly that – the time and distance can be equivalent
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125
(2)
There are relativistic effects in the solar system
There are 2 relativistic velocities – which are
v1=0.99 c and produces lorentz length contraction effect with rates 7.1 (and 1.0725
with some complex geometrical process)…and
v2 = 0.9999 c and produces lorentz length contraction effect with rate = 71
A Summary Of My Research -Part 3- (Relativistic Effects Discussion)
http://vixra.org/abs/1907.0523
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
Please Note
(A)
It's hard to discuss the data and details which prove these claims here (especially
because we deal with a heavy discussion already) – Earth & Moon Data provides
hundreds of proves for relativistic effects claim
For example
Earth moves during 27.3 days (Moon orbital period) a distance =71 million km (we
may consider the moon orbit diameter =1 million km which show the value 71 mkm
and its contracted value 1 mkm both are working in the solar system geometry)
(B)
The hard question is what's the relativistic effects geometrical role – for example –
we know there's lorentz length contraction effect – and we consider that particle
length can be contracted with higher velocity – but what effect this contraction can do
on the geometrical structure- how the contracted length will contribute in the
geometrical structure –
Imagine we have a cube – its diameter is contracted by length contraction effect – so
it becomes shorter than the square diagonal diameter – but if it becomes equal to the
cube side – can it work in the new case as a side of the cube (a side of square) –
I wish I explain my idea clearly… because the length contraction causes change for
the dimensions- but these dimensions before the contraction consist a geometrical
structure – so what's happening for this geometrical structure (a cube – a square – a
triangle ..etc)? what changes are done for this structure resulting of the length
contraction effect? That because the solar system is one machine and includes
relativistic effects - means the relativistic effects don't cause the geometrical structure
destruction but some changes only by which the system can still survive
Based on this vision
The solar system provides us a great treasure to extend Special Theory of relativity
Still the argument creditability needs more discussion- because what proves we have
to claim that – there are relativistic effects in the solar system? Based on what proves
I provided this claim?
I claim that – we can't observe the velocity by which these relativistic effects are
created – instead we can conclude its effects by analyze the planets data …
For example
I have found many distances (around 50% of all solar system orbital and internal
distances)- these distances are rated with each other with the same rate (1.0725) –and
I had no explanation why this rate is used so widely? also it's clear that this rate using
can't be specific using because it's used for huge number of distances! So it much be a
general effect- from where we can find this number 1.0725
V1=0.99c can create relativistic effects with rate =7.1 …..So
(7.1/100)+1 = 1.071 this equation almost provides a solution- so the rate 1.0725 is
found by relativistic effect but isn't used directly but by a complex geometrical
structure which causes the equation (7.1/100)+1 = 1.071
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
(C )
86400 seconds –
We will use the value 86400 mkm
86400 mkm = (71)2
x 17.2 mkm
71= lorentz length contraction effect produces by v2 =0.9999 C
(71)2
= we can call Double Contraction
So the distance 86400 mkm will contracted (in double) to produce 17.2 mkm
We know 1 mkm= 1 degrees
(Because Mercury orbital circumference =360 mkm=360 degrees)
So 17.2 mkm =17.2 degrees = Pluto orbital inclination
Also
(71)2
=5041
Where Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
How 1 solar day be 1 second?
The value 86400 mkm is contracted double (71)2
(=5040 approximately) to produce
17.2 mkm
The double contraction process is done based on the rate (71)2
= 5040 approximately
which is seen by us as a required period 5040 seconds to make Mercury day =176
solar days
The produced value 17.2 mkm is equivalent to 17 degrees
Where Pluto orbital inclination =17.2 degrees –
So the first value 17.2 degrees (the contraction result) moves in opposite direction to
second value 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination) and both together produces the
result 1
Based on that
86400 mkm will be seen as 1 mkm
But
Note please 17.2(degrees) /17.2 (degrees) = 1
1 Without any unit – it's a rate and doesn't equal 1mkm
This is not problem …
Because all solar system distances are areas (rectangles their length = the distance
and their breadth = 1mkm)
So the length unit of 17.2 mkm which creates 17.2 degrees - is removed by Pluto
orbital inclination effect
But it's breadth (1mkm) will provide the required unit to be 1 mkm and that will help
to know this process effect direction
Conclusion
86400 mkm will be contracted to be 1 mkm
Accordingly 86400 seconds will be contracted to be 1 second
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
(2nd
) The Sun Day = 365.25 solar days
By the same method
1 Day on the sun = 1 year on Earth
We start with 365.25 days
365.25 days = 71 x 5.14
(Moon Orbital Inclination =5.1 degrees)
So
71 mkm will be transported as 365.25 mkm –
And we know that
71 mkm can be contracted by v2=0.9999c and produced 1 mkm
So the main machine is the rate 71
Here we don't use double contraction (71)2
but use a simple contraction (71)
365.25 mkm will be seen by us as 365.25 solar days
So
1 mkm will be seen as 1 solar day
71 mkm is a wide used value in Earth and moon motions
For example
Earth move during 27.3 days a distance =71 mkm
Moon moves during 29.53 days a distance =71 mkm
(moon velocity will be discussed later)
Based on the previous explanation
1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth
This information we know from long time from the moon circumference
Let's remember it here
10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day) = 940 mkm
(Earth orbital circumference)
This Equation tells us that – If Earth revolves a complete revolution around the sun in
1 solar day only – so the moon circumference will be equal a distance of motion for 1
second period
This equation importance extends behind the sun rate of time proving process – it
tells that – the matter is created based on a period of time
i.e.
the time is a player in matter creation process and dimensions definition (This is the
research 5th
hypothesis Discussion)
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
4-2-3 Uranus Saturn Relationship
I - Data
2.5 degrees (Saturn orbital inclination) = 3.1 degrees (Jupiter axial tilt) x 0.8 degrees
(Uranus orbital inclination)
(116.7 degrees / 97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) ) = (Jupiter diameter / Saturn
diameter) –
Where 116.7 degrees =90 degrees +26.7 degrees (Saturn Axial Tilt)
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) /26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) =3.66
Where
(Earth Diameter / Moon Diameter) =3.66 =(Sun Diameter /Earth Moon distance TSE)
(TSE = total solar Eclipse)
I – Discussion
The previous data is added to the others showing that the relationship between
Saturn, Uranus and Earth Moon is a great is so deep relationship and effective in
three planets data
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
4-3 Solar System Main Equation
Solar System Main Equation
Z = 2X +1 Y
I-Data
Group No.1
Saturn orbital distance 1433.5 mkm = 9.42 x Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm
Saturn Diameter 120536 km = 9.42 x Earth Diameter 12756km
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees =9.42 x Saturn orbital inclination 2.5 degrees
Saturn Mass = 9.42 x 10 x Earth Mass
9.42 = 3π =2π + π
Group No.2
5906 mkm (Pluto Orbital Distance) = 9.42 x 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
Group No.3
6π x 41.4 mkm (Venus Earth Distance) = 778.6 mkm (Jupiter Orbital distance)
6π x 50.3 mkm (Venus Mercury Distance) = 940 mkm (Earth Orbital Circumference )
6π x 170 mkm (Mercury Mars Distance) = 1622 mkm (Uranus Neptune Distance)
I-Discussion
The solar system moves as a train – we accept this concept-
So there's one velocity for this system motion –velocity means one distance and one
period of time – the one distance =1433.5 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) – and one
period of time – 86400 seconds (solar day period) – so the solar system velocity
=16591.5 km/sec but the real =204 km and 16591.5 = 204 x (511/2π) – we have
discussed that before here in this paper
So …….this velocity depends on Saturn & Earth Data
Accordingly
There's a relationship between Saturn and Earth Data
As data group No.1 tells us that
Between Saturn and Earth data the rate 9.42 is used frequently – why?
Because This Rate Is Produced As A Form Of Solar System Main Equation
i.e.
The data shows that Saturn and Earth relationship is so deep and consist a basic
column for the solar system geometry
Why we need this point to discuss here? Because
(1) We need to review the solar system main equation (which we will do in
following)
Most Important
(2) We need to discuss data Group No. 2 which shows the relationship between Pluto
orbital distance and Earth Jupiter Distance – which we should in point no. 6 of this
paper (Earth Saturn Relationship Effect On Pluto Data)
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
Solar System Main Equation (Revision)
Solar System Main Equation
Z = 2X +1 Y
The basic equation
1.16 mkm = 0.406 mkm +2 x 0.377 mkm
We know this equation
Light (with supposed velocity 1.16mkm/sec) travels for 1 second to pass 1.16 mkm
Pluto motion per solar day = 0.406 mkm
Saturn Circumference = 0.377mkm
We have noticed that the Equation uses 2 values of Saturn Circumferences
So the using of 2 Saturn diameters, circumferences or orbital distances – this using is
one of the solar system geometrical features
The previous equation tells us that
Pluto motion per solar day depends on light motion for 1 second which proves the 3rd
hypothesis –
Neptune Velocity perfumes this same idea also – let's review it now
1.16 mkm = light motion for 1 second of (light supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec)
0.3 mkm = light motion for 1 second of light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec)
Total = 1.46 mkm
Pluto motion per solar day =0.4665 mkm
But
1.46 mkm =0.4665 mkm x π
The previous data supports the data same direction clearly
Please review
There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 mkm per sec (My Claim)
http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0236
Also
Definition Of Motion (I) http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0263
Definition Of Motion (II) http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0281
Definition Of Motion (III) http://vixra.org/abs/1909.0301
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
5- Earth Moon Motion Discussion
5-1 Moon Orbital Motion
5-2 Moon motion & diameter relationship
5-3 Matter Creation depends on the time
5-1 Moon Orbital Motion
Moon moves daily =2.58 mkm= Earth motion daily otherwise they will be separated
from each other
This value 2.58 mkm doesn't express the moon real motion
That because the relativistic effects make cause motion daily 2.58mkm to be2.41
mkm because of the length contraction effect 1.0725 (we have discussed it before)
So
The difference 2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm = 2 x 88000 km
Moon Daily Displacement =88000 km
So
The distance is contracted to be 2.41 mkm and need 2 x 88000 km
But the moon moves only 88000 km and this displacement is enough to make 2.41
mkm =2.58 mkm!
How that?
This is the moon motion effect on Uranus and Saturn orbital distances
He moves only 88000 km but it produces 88000 km x 2
How we know that??
Because if the distance still =2.41 mkm – that means – the moon motion distance
daily is less than Earth daily motion and they should be separated
But that doesn't happen why? Because the difference 2x88000 km is recovered and so
based on that moon motion daily =2.58 mkm= Earth Motion daily
But how we know the value 2.41 mkm?!
both values are used as moon orbital circumferences but for 2 different radiuses
Note please
By this same method Moon motion transports Uranus Energy to Saturn creating the
equality between distances
Note please
The moon moves 88000 km and produce 88000 x 2 -
By this same method Earth Moon motion transports Uranus distance to Saturn based
on the rate 50% (or vice versa)
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
5-2 Moon motion & diameter relationship
Outer planets diameters total =366500 km = Perigee radius (363000 km) (%1)
Solar planets diameters total =406000 km = Apogee Radius
Apogee perigee distance =43000km
Now
Outer Planets Diameters Total = perigee radius 363000 km +moon diameter 3475 km
That means
If the moon be at perigee point – so the distance from Earth to it = outer planets
diameters total and in the same time the rest distance to apogee after the moon will be
40000 km = inner planets diameters total
The previous data tells us that –the moon diameter is created relative to these
different distances …why?
The data tells that
Planet motion is related to its diameter (or circumference)
Let's try to support that
(1)
10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day) = 940 mkm
(Earth orbital circumference)
This Equation tells us that – If Earth revolves a complete revolution around the sun in
1 solar day only – so the moon circumference will be equal a distance of motion for 1
second period
(2)
10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 27.3 days seconds (solar day) = 0.3 mkm
This Equation Tell that - if the moon rotates around his axis once daily –so
during his orbital period – the moon pass a distance =0.3mkm= 1 second of
light motion –
I try only to show that planet motion depends on or related to this planet
diameter or circumference effect
Please review
The Moon Orbit Analysis http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0422
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I) http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0091
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
5-3 Matter Creation depends on the time
Pluto moves a distance = Pluto Diameter x π2
Group No.4
7.14
0.3mkm
nce)CircumfereSun(themkm4.37
Diameter)(Uranus51118km
nce)Circumfere(Saturnmkm0.377
Diameter)(Moonkm3475
Diameter)(Uranuskm51118
===
I-Discussion
This equation tells that clearly
10921 km (Moon Circumference) x 86400 seconds (solar day) = 940 mkm
(Earth orbital circumference)
This Equation tells us that – If Earth revolves a complete revolution around the sun in
1 solar day only – so the moon circumference will be equal a distance of motion for 1
second period
Also
I-Data
Table No. 1 Why Earth Circumference = 40080 km?
If Earth diameter = 12756 km, is considered to be = 1
Earth Circumference = 40080 km, will be just =Π - the Following is Correct Error
Earth Circumference =Π -
Solar Inner Planets Diameters Total =Π -
Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total =9Π -
Moon Orbit Radius (At Perigee Point) =9Π -
All Solar Planets Diameters Total =10Π 1%
Moon Orbit Radius (At Apogee Point) =10Π 1.2%
2 Jupiter Diameter + Saturn Diameter =10Π
Moon Orbit Radius (At Total Solar eclipse Point) =9.5Π -
Saturn Circumference =9.5Π -
Discussion
Earth rotates around her axis daily – means – Earth moves during this rotation a
distance = 40080 km – so the value 40080 km is not Earth Circumference but Earth
Motion during a solar day
So based on this distance 40080 km
All these values (in the table) are created?!
7.14
Diameter)(Plutokm2390
2)Diameter x(Satrunmkm0.241
Dis)Orbital(Mercurymkm57.9
Dis)Orbital(Plutomkm5906
Daily)Velcoity(PLutomkm0.406
Dis)Venus(Earthmkm41.4
===
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
28
No geometrical or physical explanation for this table we have – simply we don't
know why these values are rated with Earth Circumference!
The data tells us there's some relationship between this table values and the value
40080 km which Earth rotates daily
Again
We have no geometrical or physical explanation – but –data tells that there's
a relationship between Earth Circumference (earth rotation distance) and these value!
How? To answer that may we need to discover new geometrical rules
Please Note
(1)
We here don't discuss what can be created as pure coincidences – we try to
understand why this data is created as such - so we don't accept the pure coincidences
claims we analyze the data to its depth may we reach to fact can help us to understand
how this data is created…
(2)
In most of my papers I use the data depending on solar day period – for example – I
use "Mercury Velocity 4.095 mkm per Solar Day" – So the data which depends on
solar day period is spreading widely in my papers – in this paper I try to concentrate
some of them to make the picture clear as possible
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
29
6- Earth Saturn Relationship Effect On Pluto Data
6-1 Data Discussion
6-2 The Distances Interaction 6-3 Earth Jupiter Distance (627mlm)
6-1 Data Discussion
I-Data
Equation (A)
5906 mkm (Pluto Orbital Distance) = 9.42 x 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
Equation (B)
5092 mkm (Jupiter Pluto Distance) = 17 x 2 x 149.6 mkm (Earth Orbital Distance)
I-Discussion
We here discuss Equation No. (A) which we have seen among Data in (4-3) Solar
System Main Equation – but because this equation is extending one we have to used a
separated point for it..
Equation (A)
5906 mkm (Pluto Orbital Distance) = 9.42 x 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
We know the rate 9.42 = 3π =2π + π
9.42 is the rate between Earth and Saturn data – as we have discussed before
(Revision)
Saturn orbital distance 1433.5 mkm = 9.42 x Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm
Saturn Diameter 120536 km = 9.42 x Earth Diameter 12756km
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees =9.42 x Saturn orbital inclination 2.5 degrees
Saturn Mass = 9.42 x 10 x Earth Mass
So
9.42 = 3π expresses the relationship between Earth and Saturn
Based on this relationship – Pluto orbital distance is rated with Earth Jupiter
Distance! Why?! How Saturn can effect on this relationship?
Saturn here is used as a time player – simply – Saturn orbital distance 1433.5 mkm is
used as 1433.5 days
More Data
Table No.2 The Table uses 1433.5 mkm (Saturn orb. Distance) As 1433.5 Days error
-1433.5 days x Mercury velocity daily 4.095 mkm = 5906 mkm Pluto Orbital Distance 0.6%
-1433.5 days x Venus velocity daily 3.02 mkm = 4329 mkm Venus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = 3699 mkm Jupiter Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 2984.5 mkm Uranus Pluto Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Jupiter velocity daily 1.1318 mkm =1622.4 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Saturn velocity daily 0.838 mkm = 1201 mkm Mars Saturn Distance 0.3%
-1433.5 days x Uranus velocity daily 0.5875 mkm = 842 mkm
-1433.5 days x Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm = 670 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm = 580 mkm Mercury Earth distance
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
30
Deep Discussion
The previous table uses 1433.5 days as a basic period – and all planets move during
this period 1433.5 days defined distances
For example
Mercury during 1433.5 days moves a distance = Pluto Orbital Distance
(Please Note – for third time – Mercury Pluto Relationship)
What does the previous table tell us?
Saturn is found in Equation (A)
5906 mkm (Pluto Orbital Distance) = 9.42 x 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
Saturn is found as a period of time during which the planets moves defines distances
based on these distances interaction Equation (A) is created
Saturn orbital distance here is used as a time period –
How …..? because
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125
The previous table is so hard to discuss one by one – but for example
Pluto during 1433.5 days move a distance =580 million –
Do we know this value??
Of course – because
500 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec (light supposed velocity) =580 mkm
So
Pluto moves following a light beam motion
Please remember the number 580 mkm – because – we have discussed this value deeply
before and we have explained that
580 mkm a distance is passed by Pluto motion (during 1433.5 mkm) and by light motion
(During 500 seconds) and this 500 seconds is transported to Earth and defined Earth orbital
distance based on it – (149.6 mkm =500 seconds x 0.3 mkm/sec- that means – light known
velocity passes 149.6 mkm during 500 seconds)
Based on this 500 seconds the relationship between Pluto and Earth is created
Data
- Earth Velocity 2.58 mkm/ day = Pluto Velocity 0.406 mkm/ day x 2π
- Pluto Orbital Distance 5906 mkm =Earth orbital circumference 940 mkm x 2π
- Pluto Day 153 hours = Earth Day 24 hours x 2π
The previous data supports the claim clearly
For more details please review
Matter Creation Principle (Part V) http://vixra.org/abs/1908.0367
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
31
6-2 The Distances Interaction
Equation (A)
5906 mkm (Pluto Orbital Distance) = 9.42 x 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
This equation has 2 distances
5906 mkm Pluto orbital distance (distance between Pluto and the Sun)
627 mkm Earth Jupiter Distance (distance between Earth and Jupiter)
How to understand this Equation?
We have 4 players Sun, Pluto, Jupiter and Earth
Let's use the other distances between these 4 players
Equation (B)
5092 mkm (Jupiter Pluto Distance) = 17 x 2 x 149.6 mkm (Earth Orbital Distance)
We use the same players with different distances!
17.2 degrees (Pluto Orbital inclination) x 0.99 = 17 degrees
Jupiter Pluto Distance is rated with Earth orbital diameter by the rate 17
Why?
Again Jupiter Pluto distance is rated with Earth orbital distance x 2
Z=2x+1y
So data tells that – We move with the same phase – the 4 players are rated to each other by
any distance – that because we deal with a system – no pure coincidence here- the system
shows the relationship through any distance
Please Note
(1)
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Jupiter Energy, As we have discussed before that means this
distance is so specific in the solar system geometry
(2)
The rate 0.99 is discussed before frequently -
What's geometrical mechanism behind this rate 0.99 ?- it's still unclear
But we have seen that this rate is used frequently in the solar system –
The following data supports that clearly:
17.4 degrees (inner planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital
inclination)
23.6 degrees (outer planets orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degrees (Earth Axial Tilt)
(180 degrees /2π) x 0.99 = 28.3 degrees (Neptune Axial Tilt)
So the equation 17.2 x 0.99 = 17 is just one more example for many others
Which tell us that – there's a geometrical reason behind the using of 0.99 so frequently
Shortly
What does Equation (A) tell us? the distance 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) is defined
based on 2 factors which are 5092 mkm (Jupiter Pluto Distance) and 9.42 (Earth Saturn
relationship rate) where both factor are so important – and based on that- the distance 627
mkm is so specific distance in the solar system geometry – let's discover that in following:
32. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
32
6-3 Earth Jupiter Distance (627mkm)
I-Data
(a)
6939.75 seconds x 0.3 mkm/sec = 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance)
(b)
2088 seconds x 0.3 mkm/sec = 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
(c)
6939.75 seconds x c2
=627 mkm
(d)
3600 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 2 x 2088 mkm
(e)
627 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 727.3 mkm
(f)
6939.75 seconds = 71 x 97.8 seconds
97.8 seconds x 0.3mkm = 29.34 mkm
97.8 x 29.34 = 2872.5 mkm (Uranus orbital distance)
I-Discussion
(Please note 6939.75 days =Metonic Cycle)
Why 627 mkm is an important distance??
6939.75 seconds is the required period by light to pass the distance between Jupiter
and Uranus which is so important distance
Now 6939.75 seconds x c2
=627 mkm
C2
we consider frequently this value – where we remember that C2
=90000 mkm
when t=1 second
I wish we see clearly why 627 mkm is so important distance – it’s produced directly
based on c2
as similar to Uranus orbital distance (2872.5mkm)
But Uranus orb. Dis is related to 90000 mkm and our distance 627mkm is related to
2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus distance)
i.e.
2872.5 mkm is related to the sun position
But
2088 mkm is related to Jupiter position
Where we know that - the solar system energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto
That means these 2 distances express the 2 main energy trajectories in the solar
system – that makes the distance 627 mkm is the second one after 2872.5 mkm and
similar in importance to 2088 mkm
33. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
33
Saturn Table Discussion
Table No.1 The Table uses 1433.5 mkm (Saturn orb. Distance) As 1433.5 Days error
-1433.5 days x Mercury velocity daily 4.095 mkm = 5906 mkm Pluto Orbital Distance 0.6%
-1433.5 days x Venus velocity daily 3.02 mkm = 4329 mkm Venus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = 3699 mkm Jupiter Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 2984.5 mkm Uranus Pluto Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Jupiter velocity daily 1.1318 mkm =1622.4 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Saturn velocity daily 0.838 mkm = 1201 mkm Mars Saturn Distance 0.3%
-1433.5 days x Uranus velocity daily 0.5875 mkm = 842 mkm
-1433.5 days x Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm = 670 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm = 580 mkm Mercury Earth distance
We have discussed this table but
Uranus during 1433.5 days produce only 842 mkm which we don't know
Why? And what's this distance 842mkm??
842 mkm = 3.02 mkm/daily (Venus Velocity Daily) x 278.4 days
=2.58 mkm /daily (Earth Velocity Daily) x 327.6 days (lunar synodic year)
= 2.43 mkm/daily (Moon Velocity Daily) x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)
= 0.4665mkm / daily (Uranus Velocity Daily) x1800 days
= 0.406 mkm/ daily (Pluto Velocity Daily) x 2088 days
(Note 278.4 degrees = Outer Planets Axial Tilts Total)
i.e.
Uranus moves during 1433.5 days =842mkm = Pluto motion during 2088 days
But
(1433.5 mkm = Saturn orbital distance and 2088 mkm= Jupiter Uranus distance)
I wish we see the connection between Pluto and Uranus – which we have discussed
before in Uranus Day Period http://vixra.org/abs/1908.0637
Note Please
(842 mkm /57.9 mkm (mercury orbital diatance) )=14.7
14.7 is the same rate in Equations No. (I) and (II) page no.14