I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal people of the Euroa nation and pay my respects to Elders past and present.
I have been asked to start a conversation today about reablement and wellness and what that means for Regional Assessment Services. As I am talking to an audience of leaders and managers I thought I would use a leadership lense to explore with you the challenges you face in your work.
Today I am going to start a conversation with you about why I think the changes in assessment practices as well as the explicit focus on reablement and wellness has elements of both technical problems ( for example, portal issues, or not being able to send referrals to service providers) and an adaptive leadership issue.
It is not only an adaptive leadership issue for all of you as sub contractors but all the other stakeholders or actors in the sector. We are in the process of significant reform that requires the dismantling of elements of Australia’s aged care system. This takes time, changes in attitude and significant changes in practices and ways of working and why I think it is an adaptive leadership challenge
I am hoping to introduce an adaptive leadership framework and have some conversations with you about some of these changes. I will pose some questions from a leadership lense to get you to get on the balcony and look down at the last 3 months and see where things are heading for you and your team
Within your role as assessors and managing assessors it is expected that your staff are able to understand and articulate the difference between these areas.
I think there is some blurred line between restorative and re-ablement given that allied health workers are often involved in re-ablement and wellness.
Talk about gaps in the research
Identify the potential gaps in the research
Research paper by Caroline Glendinning ‘If they’re helping me then how can I be independent?’ The perceptions and experience of users of home-care re-ablement services identified how carers and some users of home care are not aware of these concepts of re-ablement.
I would like to see some research on the experience of regional assessment services and how they approach wellness and reablement, what stops them? Is the system supporting them to implement this approach?
How does reablement work for people with cognitive impairment?
What does it mean for people from different cultural backgrounds or for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
My father passed away 8 months ago of a rare aggressive form of Parkinson’s disease called Multiple System Atrophy. It is aggressive and effects the brain stem and is a bit like motor neurone disease. His journey and our families journey through this disease was a story of wellness and re-ablement because we made the system work him and for us as his supporters and allies.
My father’s journey through the aged care system was a story of wellness and at times reablement. He had access to a level 4 home care package, we had palliative care, carer respite support all of it and made the system work for him to support our family, friends and him through his journey.
He had an wellness approach to life and did not want to let the disease stop him and kept fighting to the end.
He had a home based exercise program which staff did with him twice a day as well as with family and friends encouraging him. We had hoists, wheelchairs, an accessible bathroom and a hospital bed and he did as much for himself as possible. This picture was on his 72nd birthday and all he wanted to do was to go surfing. If only I had a wheelchair that you could use in the sand he would have gone surfing.
Despite all of this we could not honour his wish of wanting to die at home because in the last four months of his life his support needs were too great for us to manage at home and he spent the last four months of his life in a nursing home.
More Stories
This is Bob. He had contacted his local neighbourhood centre in the last couple of weeks because he heard about a lunch that one of his mates attended run by the local neighbourhood centre. He wanted to attend. They referred him to My Aged Care and he was sent to the RAS for an assessment. Bob said it took me 40 minutes waiting on the phone to get to speak to someone at the contact centre. Then a couple of weeks after this “this lady came out with a computer and saw me today” – she asked me all these questions and “I am going to have some one come and clean my house” and “I am going to be able to drive again so I can get back to what I used to do”. I said to him I thought you told me that you wanted to go to the lunch group or the men’s shed or no the lady told me that I did not need that….
Story two
A neighbourhood centre who had been trying to get an Auskey to interact with the My Aged Care. They were told the organisation already had an Auskey. The manager thought that maybe it was someone from the board. She checked the board records for the last 3 years and yes it was a board member. However, the board member had died and they then had to prove to the government agency that the person had died and that the auskey needed to be changed to the manager. What appeared to be a technical problem became an adaptive leadership problem because of the systems and processes of government.
So how do we know if something is a technical problem or an adaptive leadership challenge?
Technical problems have solutions that are known.
Heifetz and Linksy talk about the ways in which you know if you have an adaptive leadership challenge.
If the solution requires working in a different way than you do now…
If the problem AND the solution require learning…
If the solution requires shifting the authority and responsibility to the people who are affected….
If the solution requires some sacrifice of your past ways of working or living.. (eg losses)
If the solution requires experimenting before you’re sure of the answer…
If the solution will take a long time…
If the challenge connects or challenges people’s deeply held values….
One of the challenges of personalisation is to appreciate and understand the historical forces or structures that have created the different service systems in this country.
If you look at history we have come a long way, however, we are in the process of dismantling a whole service infrastructure and moving from a block funded to individualised funding system with different stages occurring for older people, people with disabilities and their carers.
This picture shows some of the drivers of personalisation for older people in Australia. It contends that for older people they were largely invisible and the system was created in the interests of professionals, providers and with older people institutionalised. However, with the economic costs of ageing combined with the changing expectations and the emergence of the concept of active ageing we are seeing changing models.
However, moving from the Old to New system takes time is a complex process of dismantling and transitioning not only funding but the practices, values of people in your organisations. It also requires people to lead organisations through significant changes – It is an adaptive leadership challenge.
There are significant changes happening in the policy landscape in age care and disability policy in Australia as part of the agenda of personalisation. The assumptions that underpin these shifts include the changing role of people who use public services shifting from being ‘passive’ clients to ‘active consumers’. It is assumed that people who use disability services or aged care services will become active ‘consumers’. Rather than being passive clients relying on professionals for support and advice people are assumed to be active engaged ‘consumers’ who will make informed choices about their care.
Flowing from this assumption is the need for changes in the how agencies are funded from block funded to individually funded. It is assumed that individualised funding will provide more mechanisms for service users to get their needs met. We are seeing this funding system emerging as part of the launch sites of the NDIS as well as the emergence of the concept of ‘consumer directed care’ in packaged care in aged care in Australia.
As part of this changing landscape there are significant challenges for small, medium to large organisations in being able to thrive and survive in this changing landscape? As well as considering the structures that are in place to enable the participation and engagement of service users in your service.
Underpinning these changes are competing tensions between human rights of people on the one hand and economic positioning and arguments about the costs of ageing.