RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) is a technology allowing a higher level of storage reliability and performance from disk-drive components via the technique of arranging them into arrays.
A RAID array is a configuration with multiple physical disks set up to use RAID architecture like RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, etc. While the RAID array distributes data across multiple disks, it is considered as a single disk by the server operating system.
Learn more...
RAID (originally redundant array of inexpensive disks, now commonly redundant array of independent disks) is a data storage virtualization technology that combines multiple physical disk drive components into a single logical unit for the purposes of data redundancy, performance improvement, or both.
RAID (originally redundant array of inexpensive disks, now commonly redundant array of independent disks) is a data storage virtualization technology that combines multiple physical disk drive components into a single logical unit for the purposes of data redundancy, performance improvement, or both.
RAID, short for redundant array of independent (originally inexpensive) disks is a disk subsystem that stores your data across multiple disks to either increase the performance or provide fault tolerance to your system (some levels provide both).
Performance evolution of raid is a presentation slide about RAID, Its classification, Importance,Concept about RAID,Standard Raid Level,Implementation of Raid, Performance and Advantages Comparison among RAID Levels.
Hope It will be helpfull..................
RAID (originally redundant array of inexpensive disks, now commonly redundant array of independent disks) is a data storage virtualization technology that combines multiple physical disk drive components into a single logical unit for the purposes of data redundancy, performance improvement, or both.
A technology which is used for increasing the storage reliability and performance.It is a redundant array of inexpensive disks.It is an important aspect of computer science,which is little hard for undergrads to understand.
RAID, short for redundant array of independent (originally inexpensive) disks is a disk subsystem that stores your data across multiple disks to either increase the performance or provide fault tolerance to your system (some levels provide both).
Performance evolution of raid is a presentation slide about RAID, Its classification, Importance,Concept about RAID,Standard Raid Level,Implementation of Raid, Performance and Advantages Comparison among RAID Levels.
Hope It will be helpfull..................
RAID (originally redundant array of inexpensive disks, now commonly redundant array of independent disks) is a data storage virtualization technology that combines multiple physical disk drive components into a single logical unit for the purposes of data redundancy, performance improvement, or both.
A technology which is used for increasing the storage reliability and performance.It is a redundant array of inexpensive disks.It is an important aspect of computer science,which is little hard for undergrads to understand.
RAID is a data storage
virtualization technology that
combines multiple physical
disk drive components into
one or more logical units for
the purposes of data
redundancy, performance
improvement, or both.
RAID (redundant array of independent disks) is a way of storing the same data in different places on multiple hard disks or solid-state drives (SSDs) to protect data in the case of a drive failure.
RAID (redundant array of independent disks) is a way of storing the same data in different places on multiple hard disks or solid-state drives (SSDs) to protect data in the case of a drive failure
Exercise 3-1 This chapter’s opening scenario illustrates a specific .docxnealwaters20034
Exercise 3-1 This chapter’s opening scenario illustrates a specific type of incident/disaster. Using a Web browser, search for information related to preparing an organization against terrorist attacks. Look up information on (a) anthrax or another biological attack (like smallpox), (b) sarin or another toxic gas, (c) low-level radiological contamination attacks. Exercise 3-2 Using a Web browser, search for available commercial applications that use various forms of RAID technologies, such as RAID 0 through RAID 5. What is the most common implementation? What is the most expensive?
The following sections discuss the RAID configurations that are most commonly used in the IT industry. RAID Level 0 This is not a form of redundant storage. RAID 0 creates one larger logical volume across several available hard disk drives and stores the data using a process known as disk striping, in which data segments, called stripes, are written in turn to each disk drive in the array. When this is done to allow multiple drives to be combined in order to gain large capacity without data redundancy, it is called disk striping without parity. Unfortunately, failure of one drive may make all data inaccessible. In fact, this level of RAID does not improve the risk situation when using disk drives; instead, it rather increases the risk of losing data from a single drive failure. RAID Level 1 Commonly called disk mirroring, RAID 1 uses twin drives in a computer system. The computer records all data to both drives simultaneously, providing a backup if the primary drive fails. This is a rather expensive and inefficient use of media. A variation of mirroring is called disk duplexing. With mirroring, the same drive controller manages both drives; with disk duplexing, each drive has its own controller. Mirroring is often used to create duplicate copies of operating system volumes for high-availability systems. Using this technique, a plan can be developed that mirrors and then splits disk pairs to create highly available copies of critical system drives. This can make multiple copies of critical data or programs readily available when needed for high-availability computing environments. RAID Level 2 A specialized form of disk striping with parity, RAID 2 is not widely used. It uses a specialized parity coding mechanism known as the Hamming code to store stripes of data on multiple data drives and corresponding redundant error correction on separate error-correcting drives. This approach allows the reconstruction of data if some of the data or redundant parity information is lost. There are no commercial implementations of RAID 2. Failure-Resistant Disk Systems (FRDS) Failure-Tolerant Disk Systems (FTDS) Disaster-Tolerant Disk Systems (DTDS) Protection against data loss due to replaceable unit failure Replaceable unit and environmental failure warning Protection against loss of access to data due to zone failure Replaceable unit monitoring and failure indication Protect.
Chapter 8 - Multimedia Storage and RetrievalPratik Pradhan
This is the subject slides for the module MMS2401 - Multimedia System and Communication taught in Shepherd College of Media Technology, Affiliated with Purbanchal University.
The Cisco IP Phone 8800 Key Expansion Module adds extra programmable buttons to the phone. The programmable buttons can be set up as phone speed-dial buttons, or phone feature buttons.
Cisco catalyst 9200 series platform spec, licenses, transition guideIT Tech
The Cisco Catalyst 9200 Series switches are Cisco’s latest addition to the fixed enterprise switching access platform, and are built for security, resiliency, and programmability.
The 900 ISRs offer easy management and pro-visioning capabilities through Cisco Configuration Professional Express, Cisco DNA Center, and Cisco IOS Software, with full visibility into and control of network configurations and applications.
Hpe pro liant gen9 to gen10 server transition guideIT Tech
HPE ProLiant Gen10 servers offer a secure, high-performing, and highly affordable platform to run Big Data workloads and the most demanding applications.
They provide a complete infrastructure that supports both your business objectives and your business growth.
Cisco ISR 4461 is the newest number of Cisco 4000 Family Integrated Services Router. Now the Cisco 4000 Family contains the following platforms: the 4461 ISR, 4451 ISR, 4431 ISR, 4351 ISR, 4331 ISR, 4321 ISR and 4221 ISR.
New nexus 400 gigabit ethernet (400 g) switchesIT Tech
Cisco unveils new 400 Gigabit Ethernet (400G) switches.
Meeting modern data center network challenges demands high scale and high bandwidth. Large cloud and data center customers require a flexible, reliable solution that efficiently manages, troubleshoots and analyzes their IT infrastructure. They need security, automation, visibility, analytics and assurance. Yes, the new Cisco Nexus 400G Switches can help large cloud and data center customers stay ahead of these demands.
Tested cisco isr 1100 delivers the richest set of wi-fi featuresIT Tech
Cisco ISR 1000 offers a branch-in-a-box solution with various types of uplink connectivity, multiple Power over Ethernet (PoE) and PoE+ capable Gigabit-Ethernet ports, and built-in Cisco Mobility Express Solution for WLAN access and SD-WAN capability.
Aruba’s modern, programmable switches easily integrate with our industry leading network management solutions, either cloud-based Aruba Central or on premise Aruba AirWave.
Cisco IOS XE opens a completely new paradigm in network configuration, operation, and monitoring through network automation. Cisco’s automation solution is open, standards-based, and extensible across the entire lifecycle of a network device. The various automation mechanisms are outlined here.
Cisco's wireless solutions can be broadly classified into Standalone systems that operate Cisco Aironet Access Points individually and Controller-based systems that centrally manage multiple Cisco Aironet Access Points using a Cisco Wireless Controller. Multiple expansion modes are also supported in Controller-based systems.
Four reasons to consider the all in-one isr 1000IT Tech
For SMBs, Cisco’s 1000 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 1000) provides an affordable solution for switching, routing, and wireless all in one device.
The difference between yellow and white labeled ports on a nexus 2300 series fexIT Tech
What is the Difference between Yellow and White Labeled Ports on a Nexus 2300 Series FEX?
The Cisco Nexus 2300 platform provides two types of ports: ports for end-host attachment (host interfaces) and uplink ports (fabric interfaces). Both yellow and white colored fabric interfaces can be used to provide connectivity to the upstream parent Cisco Nexus switch. There is no difference between yellow labeled and white labeled uplink ports.
The Cisco 892F ISRs have an SFP port that supports auto-media-detection, auto-failover, and remote fault indication (RFI), as described in the IEEE 802.3ah specification.
The Nexus 7000 Series switches form the core data center networking fabric. There are multiple chassis options from the Nexus 7000 and Nexus 7700 product family. The Nexus 7000 and the Nexus 7700 switches offer a comprehensive set of features for the data center network.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Knowledge engineering: from people to machines and back
Raid the redundant array of independent disks technology overview
1. <Tags> RAID technology, various RAID architectures, RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID
5, types of RAID managers, hardware solutions
RAID/Redundant Array of Independent Disks Technology Overview
An overview of RAID technology
RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) is a technology allowing a
higher level of storage reliability and performance from disk-drive components
via the technique of arranging them into arrays.
A RAID array is a configuration with multiple physical disks set up to use
RAID architecture like RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, etc. While the RAID array
distributes data across multiple disks, it is considered as a single disk by the
server operating system.
The various RAID architectures are designed to meet at least one of these
two goals:
o increase data reliability
o increase Input/Output (I/O) performance
A RAID array is composed of two or more physical hard disks combined into a
single logical storage unit. To give RAID array additional features compared to
JBOD (Just a Bunch of Disk), three main concepts are used:
o Mirroring
o Striping
o Error correction
Mirroring is the writing of identical data to more than one disk. The basic
example of mirroring is a RAID 1 array formed by two disks. Both disks have
the same content at any time. If the first drive fails, read and write operation
can be done directly on the second disk. Read operations on mirrored arrays
is faster compared to a single disk since the system can fetch data from
multiple disks at the same time. However, write operations are slower since
the data must be written to all disks instead of only one. The reconstruction
of a failed mirror array is quite simple: data must be copied from the healthy
disk to the new one. During reconstruction, the read performance boost of
the mirror array is reduced since only the healthy disk is fully usable.
Striping is the splitting of data across multiple disks. For example, a RAID 0
array formed by two disks strips data to both disks. Striping does not provide
fault tolerance, only a performance boost. Read and write operations on a
striped array are faster compared to a single disks as both operation are split
between the available disks.
2. Error correction stores parity data on disk to allow the detection and possibly
the correction of problems. RAID 5 is a good example of the error correction
mechanism. For example, a RAID 5 array composed of three drive strips data
on the first two disks and stores parity on the third disk to provide fault
tolerance. The error correction mechanism will slow down performance
especially for write operation since both data and parity information needs to
be written instead of data only. Moreover, the reconstruction of a failed array
using parity information incurs severe performance degradation as data needs
to be fetched from all drives in the array to rebuild the information for the
new disk.
The design of any RAID scheme is a compromise between data protection
and performance. The comprehension of your server requirements in terms of
storage is crucial to select the appropriate RAID configuration.
Hardware vs. Software RAID
There are two types of RAID managers:
o hardware
o software
Hardware solutions are specialized hardware components connected to the
server motherboard. Most of the time, these components will provide a post-
BIOS configuration interface that can be run before booting your server
operating system. Each configured RAID array will present himself to the
operating system as a single storage drive. The RAID array can be partitioned
into various RAID volumes at the operating system level.
On the other hand, software solutions are implemented at the operating
system level and directly create RAID volumes from entire physical disks or
partitions. Each RAID volume is seen as a standard storage space for the
applications running within the operating system. Both approaches have
advantages and disadvantages compared to each other.
Depending on the manufacturer, an hardware RAID card supporting up to 8
drives is usually sold between 400$ and 1200$ while a software RAID solution
is usually included free of charge with the operating system of your server.
Under Linux, the md RAID subsystem is able to support most RAID
configurations. Under Microsoft Windows, Software RAID is provided through
the use of dynamic disks in the disk management console.
The required processing power for RAID 0, RAID 1 and RAID 10 is relatively
low. Parity-based arrays like RAID 5, RAID 6, RAID 50 and RAID 60 require
more complex data processing during write or integrity check operations.
However, this processing time is minimal on modern CPU units as the
increase in speed of commodity CPUs has been consistently greater than the
increase in speed of hard disk drive throughput over history. Thus, the
3. percentage of server CPU time required to saturate an hard disk RAID array
throughput has been dropping and will probably continue to do so in the
future.
A more serious issue with software RAID array is how the operating system
deals with the boot process. Since the RAID information is kept at the
operating system level, booting a faulty RAID array is problematic. At boot
time, the operating system is not available to coordinate the failover to
another drive if the usual boot drive fails. Such systems may require manual
intervention to make them bootable again after a failure. A hardware RAID
controller is initialized before the boot process starts looking for information
on the disk drives. Therefore, hardware RAID controller will increase the
robustness of your server compared to software RAID.
A hardware RAID controller may also support hot swappable hard drives. With
such a feature, hard disks can be changed in a server without having to turn
off the power and open up server case. Removing a failed hard drive and
replacing it with a new one is a simple task with a hardware RAID controller
supporting hot swappable disks. Without this feature, the server needs to be
powered off before replacing the failed drive. This will lead to downtime
unless your web solution is properly clustered.
Finally, only hardware RAID controllers can carry a Battery Backup Unit (BBU)
to preserve the cache memory of the controller if the server is shut down
abruptly. Without such a protection, write-back cache should be disabled on
the RAID array to prevent data corruption. Turning off write-back cache
comes with a performance penalty for write operations on the RAID array.
The use of a BBU on your RAID controller is a solution to safely enable write-
back caching and improve write performance.
A RAID array is not a backup solution
Most RAID arrays provide protection in case of a disk failure. While such a
protection is important to protect yourself from data loss due to hardware
failure, it does not provide historical data. A RAID array does not allow to
recover a deleted or corrupted file due to a bug in your application. A backup
solution will allow you to go back in time to recover deleted or corrupted files.
Implementation
Note: images were adapted from those available on Wikipedia.
RAID 0
4. RAID 0 is a pure implementation of striping. A minimum of two (2) disks is
required for RAID 0. No parity information is stored for redundancy. It is
important to note that RAID 0 was not one of the original RAID levels and
provides no data redundancy. RAID 0 is normally used to increase
performance. RAID 0 is useful for setups where redundancy is irrelevant.
A RAID 0 array can be created with disks of differing sizes, but the total
available storage space in the array is limited by the size of the smallest disk.
For example, if a 450GB disk is striped together with a 300GB disk, the usable
size of the array will be 2 x min(450GB, 300GB) = 600GB.
For reads and writes operations dealing with small data blocks such as
database access, the data will be fetched independently on each disk of the
RAID 1 array. If the data sectors accessed are spread evenly between the two
disks, the apparent seek time of the array will be half that of a single disk.
The transfer speed of the array will be the transfer speed of all the disks
added together, limited only by the speed of the RAID controller. For reads
and writes operations dealing with large data blocks such as copying files or
video playback, the data will most likely be fetch on a single disk reducing the
performance gain of the RAID 0 array.
RAID 1
5. RAID 1 is a pure implementation of mirroring. A minimum of two (2) disks is
required for RAID 1. This is useful when read performance or reliability are
more important than data storage capacity. A classic RAID 1 mirrored pair
contains two disks (see diagram), which increases reliability over a single disk.
Since each member contains a complete copy of the data, and can be
addressed independently, ordinary wear-and-tear reliability is raised.
A RAID 1 array can be created with disks of differing sizes, but the total
available storage space in the array is equal to the size of the smallest disk.
For example, if a 450GB disk is mirrored with a 300GB disk, the usable size of
the array will be min(450GB, 300GB) = 300GB.
The read performance of a RAID 1 array can go up roughly as a linear
multiple of the number of copies. That is, a RAID 1 array of two disks can
query two different places at the same time so the read performance should
be two times higher than the performance of a single disk. RAID 1 is a good
starting point for applications such as email and web servers as well as for
any other use requiring above average read I/O performance and hardware
failure protection.
RAID 5
6. RAID 5 array uses block-level striping with distributed parity blocks across all
member disks. The disk used for the parity block is staggered from one stripe
to the next, hence the term distributed parity blocks. A minimum of three (3)
disks is required for RAID 5. This RAID configuration is mainly used to
maximize disk space while providing a protection for your data in case of a
disk failure.
Given the diagram of the RAID 5 array, where each column is a disk, let
assume A1=00000101and A2=00000011. The parity block Ap is generated
by applying the XOR operator on A1 and A2: Ap = A1 XOR A2 = 00000110
If the first disk fails, A1 will no longer be accessible, but can be reconstructed:
A1 = A2 XOR Ap = 00000101
A RAID 5 array can be created with disks of differing sizes, but the total
available storage space in the array is limited by the size of the smallest disk.
The parity data consumes a complete disk, leaving N-1 disks for usable
storage space in an array composed of N disks. For example, on an array
formed of three 450GB disks and one 300GB disk, the usable size of the array
will be (4-1) x min(450GB, 300GB) = 900GB.
RAID 5 writes are expensive in terms of disk operations and traffic between
the disks and the RAID controller since both data and parity information need
to be written to disk. The parity blocks are not read on data reads, since this
would add unnecessary overhead and would diminish performance. However,
the parity blocks are read when a defective disk sector is present in the
required data blocks. Likewise, should a disk fail in the array, the parity blocks
7. and the data blocks from the surviving disks are combined mathematically to
reconstruct data from the failed drive in real-time. This situation leads to
severe performance degradation on the array for read and write operations.
RAID 6
RAID 6 extends RAID 5 by adding an additional parity block. Block-level
striping is combined with two parity blocks distributed across all member disks.
A minimum of four (4) disks is required for RAID 6. This RAID configuration is
mainly used to maximize disk space while providing a protection for up to two
disk failures.
Both parity blocks Ap and Aq are generated from the data blocks A1, A2 and
A3. Ap is generated by applying the XOR operator on A1, A2 and A3. Aq is
generated using a more complex variant of the Ap formulae. If the first disk
fails, A1 will no longer be accessible, but can be reconstructed using A2 and
A3 plus the Ap parity block. If both the first and the second disk fail, A1 and
A2 will no longer be accessible, but can be reconstructed using A3 plus both
Ap and Aq parity blocks. The computation of Aq is CPU intensive, in contrast
to the simplicity of Ap. Thus, a software RAID 6 implementation may have a
significant effect on system performance especially during the reconstruction
of a failed disk.
A RAID 6 array can be created with disks of differing sizes, but the total
available storage space in the array is limited by the size of the smallest disk.
The parity data consumes two complete disks, leaving N-2 disks for usable
storage space in an array composed of N disks. For example, on an array
formed of four 450GB disks and one 300GB disk, the usable size of the array
will be (5-2) x min(450GB, 300GB) = 900GB.
8. RAID 6 writes are even more expensive than RAID 5 writes in terms of disk
operations and traffic between the disks and the RAID controller since both
data and parity information need to be written to disk. The parity blocks are
not read on data reads, since this would add unnecessary overhead and
would diminish performance. However, the parity blocks are read when a
defective disk sector is present in the required data blocks. Likewise, should a
disk fail in the array, the parity blocks and the data blocks from the surviving
disks are combined mathematically to reconstruct data from the failed drive in
real-time. This situation leads to severe performance degradation on the array
for read and write operations.
RAID 10
RAID 10 is a combination of RAID 1 (mirroring) and RAID 0 (striping) where
4N mirrored disks are striped together. A minimum of four (4) disks are
required for RAID 10. One disk in each RAID 1 mirror can fail without
damaging the data contained in the entire array.
A RAID 10 array can be created with disks of differing sizes, but the total
available storage space in the array is limited by the size of the smallest disk.
The mirroring consumes half of disk space, leaving 2N disks for usable
storage space in an array composed of 4N disks. For example, on an array
9. formed of seven 450GB disks and one 300GB disk, the usable size of the
array will be (7+1)/2 x min(450GB, 300GB) = 1200GB.
RAID 10 provides better performance than all other redundant RAID
levels. It is the preferable RAID level for I/O intensive applications such as
database servers as well as for any other use requiring high disk performance.
RAID 50
RAID 50 is a combination of RAID 5 (striping and error correction)
and RAID 0 (striping) where RAID 5 sub-arrays are striped together.
A minimum of six (6) disks are required for RAID 50. One disk in each RAID 5
sub-array can fail without damaging the data contained in the entire array.
A RAID 50 array can be created with disks of differing sizes, but the
total available storage space in the array is limited by the size of the
smallest disk. The parity data consumes a complete disk in each RAID 5
sub-array, leaving N-2 disks for usable storage space in an array composed of
N disks. For example, on an array formed of seven 450GB disks and one
300GB disk, the usable size of the array will be (8-2) x min (450GB, 300GB) =
1800GB.
RAID 50 provides better performance than RAID 5 but requires more disks.
The performance gain is particularly observed for write operations. This level
10. is recommended for applications that require high fault tolerance along with
high capacity.
Hot spare disks
Both hardware and software redundant RAID arrays may support the use of
hot spare disks. Such disks are physically installed in the array and are
inactive until an active disk fails. The RAID controller automatically replaces
the failed drive with the spare and starts the rebuilding process for the
affected array. This reduces the vulnerability window of the array by providing
a healthy disk to the array as soon as a problematic disk is identified.
For example, a RAID 5 array with a single hot spare disk uses the same
number of disks as a RAID 6 array while providing a similar level of protection.
The use of hot spare disks is particularly important for RAID arrays formed by
multiple disks. For example, a RAID 10 array formed of 12 disks will most
likely have a higher disk failure rate than a RAID 10 array of 4 disks. Putting
aside one or two disks as hot spare for your large RAID array will provide
additional protection in case of disk failure.
RAID arrays allow a higher level of reliability and performance for your server
storage. While RAID 1 is a good starting point for applications such as email
and web servers, RAID 10 is recommended for database applications. RAID 5
or RAID 50 can be used for backup appliances where high fault tolerance
along with high capacity are needed.
Info from http://blog.iweb.com/en/2010/05/an-overview-of-raid-
technology/4283.html
More info
o Wikipedia article, RAID
o Art S. Kagel, RAID 5 vs 10 RAID
This article was written by Patrice Guay. It was originately published on his
blog at the address: http://www.patriceguay.com/webhosting/raid and
reprinted with permission. Patrice is a sales engineer at iWeb Technologies.
More Related
How to Buy a Server for Your Business?
A Guide for Storage Newbies: RAID Levels Explained
11. How to Buy a Server for Your Business?
How to Choose a Server for Your Data Center’s Needs?
Configuring the hpe proliant dl380 gen9 24 sff cto server as a vertica node
Use Cases: Cisco UCS S3260 Storage Server with MapR Converged Data
Platform and Cloudera Enterprise