PPlantlant DDiseaseisease RResistanceesistance GGenes andenes and
CCroprop BBreedingreeding
Janarthanan .P
qRT-PCR Lab
1
Of 77 billionbillion
peoplespeoples
11 billions arebillions are
Hungry..Hungry..
World Food Demand Scenario
We need to increase food
production by 50% by 2030
and by 70–100% by 2050.
2
Global harvest initiative -2011Global harvest initiative -2011
FAO -2010FAO -2010
Constrains in Food Production
 Plant diseases
 Major Threat to global food security
 Also reduces the Crop quality
3
Jia et al., 2000
Plant Immune System
R-genes – Essential for Disease Resistance Breeding
Jones & Dangl (2006)
 Genes in plant genomes that convey
plant disease resistance against
pathogens by producing R proteins
 Encode putative receptors that
respond to the products of ‘Effector
genes’ expressed by the pathogen
during infection.
 Majority contains conserved domains
(essential for perception/signal
transduction activity)
• Nucleotide binding site (NBS),
• leucine rich repeats (LRR), and a
• Serine /threonine protein kinase.
What are Resistance Genes (R-Genes)
5
(NBS: nucleotide-binding site; LRR: leucine-rich repeat; TIR: Toll-interleukin-1 receptor; CC: coiled-
coil; TM: transmembrane domain; PK: Protein Kinase; WRKY: WRKY domain; B-lectin: bulb-type
mannose specific binding lectin domain).
Classes of R-Genes
6
Martin et al., 2003
7
Plant proteins belonging to
the nucleotide-binding site–
leucine-rich repeat (NBS-
LRR) family are used for
pathogen detection.
(R-PROTEIN)
Harmful organism
Recognition by
resistance protein
Signal to cell
nucleus
Genetic
material
Defense
Response Defense protein
(R-PROTEIN)
Outsideplantcell
Insideplantcell
Diagram of a plant disease resistance protein in action. A portion of the protein
(MAROON) lies outside the cell and specifically recognises the harmful organism.
The remaining portion of the protein (RED) resides inside the cell and
communicates a signal to the plant’s genetic material, which in turn stimulates a
defense response against the invading organism.
R-Gene in Action
NBS-LRR
PROTEIN
(R-GENE)
 It has concerted responses can efficiently Halt the pathogen
growth with minimal collateral damage to the plant
 Dozens of R genes, against many different pathogens, have now
been cloned from a variety of plants
 The vast majority of genes cloned so far belong to the NBS-LRR,
LRR, or LRR-Kinase super families
 These super families were initially identified in tomato, tobacco
and Arabidopsis by map-based cloning or transposon tagging.
8
GENE PLANT PATHOGEN YEAR ISOLATED
Pto Tomato Pseudomonas syringae
pv. tomato (avrPto)
1993
PBS1 Arabidopsis Pseudomonas syringae
pv. phaseolicola(avrPphB)
2001
RPS2 Arabidopsis Pseudomonas syringae
pv. maculicola (avrRpt2)
1994
N Tobacco Tobacco Mosaic virus 1994
Bs2 Pepper Xanthomonas campestris pv.
vesicatoria (avrBs2)
1999
RRS-1 Arabidopsis Ralstonia solanacearum 2002
Pi-ta Rice Magnaporthe grisea(avrPita) 2000
Cf-9 Tomato Cladosporium fulvum(Avr9) 1994
Ve2 Tomato Verticillium albo-atrum 2001
Xa-21 Rice Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae 1995
Gururani et.al.,2012
Cloned R genes
9
Features of R genes
 Follows gene for gene hypothesis
 Co-evolve
 predominantly inherited
 Highly polymorphic
 Majority of them code for specific receptors
(Proteins, enzymes, antimicrobial compounds)
10
R gene – discovery approachesR gene – discovery approaches
Map based cloning
Molecular markers map + BAC libraries screening
Transposon tagging
Mutational R gene Enrichment Sequencing
(MutRenSeq)
11
Map based cloning
 It otherwise called as
Positional Cloning.
 First plant resistance
gene (Pto) isolated using
Map Based cloning
 Using the genetic
relationship between a
gene and a marker as the
basis of Map based cloning.
12
 Tomato Pto gene
 Provides resistance against
bacterial speck disease
 Pseudomonas syringa pv
 Rice Xa21 gene
 Resistance to Bacterial blight
disease
 Xanthomonas oryzae pv.
Rice pi9,pi2 gene
 Resistance to Rice blast disease
 Mangnaporthe grisea
Examples
Laborious,
Time Consuming
Expensive
Skilled man power
required
Infra structure
Limitations
13
Transposon Tagging
 It was first recognized by McClintock
 It is an insertion based technique.
 Transposon mutagenesis in plants has become an increasingly
useful tool for gene discovery.
 A transposable element is a DNA sequence that has the ability to
change its location in the genome, i.e., it can transpose from one
location to another in the genome.
14
Transposon tagging describes isolation of genes using transposable
elements as gene tags.
 When a transposon integrates within a gene, the gene function is
lost.
 The inserted fragment is usually a well characterized transposable
element, most of which has been sequenced
Gene can be easily recognize by sequence of the inserted fragment.
15
16
Steps involved in Transposon tagging
 Transposon tagging has been used to isolate several genes in
 Maize (e.g. A1, A2, BZ2, C1, C2, opaque2, R, P, etc.),
 Tomato (cf-9, Dem, etc.)
 Tobacco (cf-4A, N)
A major limitation of the method is the low frequency
of transposition.
Most species lack active transposons
Limitations:
Examples :
17
Mutational R gene ENrichment Sequencing
(MutRenSeq)
 Scientists at the John Innes Centre (JIC) and The Sainsbury
Laboratory (TSL) have pioneered a new gene detecting technology
called MutRenSeq
 It is used to accurately pinpoints the location of disease resistance
genes in large plant genomes.
 We can very quickly locate resistance genes from crops, clone them
and stack multiple resistance genes into our elite variety.
 It has reduced the time it takes to clone the genes into crops from 5
to 10 years down to 2 years.
18
MutRenSeqMutRenSeq -- 3 Step method
19
 Using Ethyl Methane Sulfonate, a chemical known for causing
genetic variations.
 Mutagenized seeds called M1 generation, the plants are generated
self pollinated and make M2 Families
 EMS mutagenesis of resistant plant, creation of independent M2
families and screening for susceptible mutants
EMS Mutagenesis
20
R gene ENrichment Sequencing
 RenSeq - involves capturing fragments from a genomic or cDNA
library using biotinylated RNA oligonucleotides designed to be
complementary to the NBS-LRR-encoding genes of a reference
genome
Target enrichment using a NBS-LRR–specific bait library and
sequencing of the wild-type and susceptible mutants
Sequences sources were derived from publicly available gene
annotations
21
A de novo assembly of the enriched sequences of the resistant
wild type is used as a reference for mapping.
Subsequent SNV and presence/absence calls are integration and
scoring.
Data analysis and candidate calling
22
Wild type Resistant Plant
Clear phenotype associated with single gene
EMS screen and identify loss-of-function mutants
Assumption of the structure of target gene (e.g. NB-LRR)
 Advantages:
No reference required
No fine mapping
No BAC library
No problems due to suppressed recombination
Time saving
 Requirement
23
Case StudyCase Study
Wheat RustWheat Rust
(Puccinia triticina)
(Puccinia striiformis)
(Puccinia graminis)
24
Burkhard et al., Apr 2016.
Wild type Resistant plant
EMS 6 Susceptible
mutants (1300
M2 Plants)
RenSeq
Wild-type & 6
mutants
Data
Analysis
 Total mutations ~ 44 to 84
 23 contigs that were mutated in 2 mutants
 3 contigs that were mutated in 3 mutants
 Single 3,408-bp contig, that contained
independent mutations in 5 of the 6 mutants
Wild-type assembly
&
Identified a contig
carried mutation in N-
terminal region of the
same gene
Joined the contigs to obtain the
full-length sequence of the
predicted open reading frame
CandidateCandidate
genegene (Sr22(Sr22))
25
Work flow
26
Susceptible Transgenic (Sr22)
Sr22 & Sr45 Validation
Introgression (Sr45)
 Pesticides can control these diseases but they are harmful to
environment and very expensive.
 Wild relatives of domesticated crops contain many useful disease
resistance (R) genes. Introducing this natural resistance is an smart way
of managing disease.
 Benefits of using the plant resistance genes in resistance breeding
programs include
 Efficient reduction of pathogen growth,
 Minimal damage to the host plant,
 Zero input of pesticides from the farmers (Economical)
Eco friendly nature of such crops
 We have to adapt new technologies that helps to enhance the
disease resistance and productivity.
Conclusion
27
28

R genes in Plants

  • 1.
    PPlantlant DDiseaseisease RResistanceesistanceGGenes andenes and CCroprop BBreedingreeding Janarthanan .P qRT-PCR Lab 1
  • 2.
    Of 77 billionbillion peoplespeoples 11billions arebillions are Hungry..Hungry.. World Food Demand Scenario We need to increase food production by 50% by 2030 and by 70–100% by 2050. 2 Global harvest initiative -2011Global harvest initiative -2011 FAO -2010FAO -2010
  • 3.
    Constrains in FoodProduction  Plant diseases  Major Threat to global food security  Also reduces the Crop quality 3 Jia et al., 2000
  • 4.
    Plant Immune System R-genes– Essential for Disease Resistance Breeding Jones & Dangl (2006)
  • 5.
     Genes inplant genomes that convey plant disease resistance against pathogens by producing R proteins  Encode putative receptors that respond to the products of ‘Effector genes’ expressed by the pathogen during infection.  Majority contains conserved domains (essential for perception/signal transduction activity) • Nucleotide binding site (NBS), • leucine rich repeats (LRR), and a • Serine /threonine protein kinase. What are Resistance Genes (R-Genes) 5
  • 6.
    (NBS: nucleotide-binding site;LRR: leucine-rich repeat; TIR: Toll-interleukin-1 receptor; CC: coiled- coil; TM: transmembrane domain; PK: Protein Kinase; WRKY: WRKY domain; B-lectin: bulb-type mannose specific binding lectin domain). Classes of R-Genes 6 Martin et al., 2003
  • 7.
    7 Plant proteins belongingto the nucleotide-binding site– leucine-rich repeat (NBS- LRR) family are used for pathogen detection. (R-PROTEIN) Harmful organism Recognition by resistance protein Signal to cell nucleus Genetic material Defense Response Defense protein (R-PROTEIN) Outsideplantcell Insideplantcell Diagram of a plant disease resistance protein in action. A portion of the protein (MAROON) lies outside the cell and specifically recognises the harmful organism. The remaining portion of the protein (RED) resides inside the cell and communicates a signal to the plant’s genetic material, which in turn stimulates a defense response against the invading organism. R-Gene in Action NBS-LRR PROTEIN (R-GENE)
  • 8.
     It hasconcerted responses can efficiently Halt the pathogen growth with minimal collateral damage to the plant  Dozens of R genes, against many different pathogens, have now been cloned from a variety of plants  The vast majority of genes cloned so far belong to the NBS-LRR, LRR, or LRR-Kinase super families  These super families were initially identified in tomato, tobacco and Arabidopsis by map-based cloning or transposon tagging. 8
  • 9.
    GENE PLANT PATHOGENYEAR ISOLATED Pto Tomato Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (avrPto) 1993 PBS1 Arabidopsis Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola(avrPphB) 2001 RPS2 Arabidopsis Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (avrRpt2) 1994 N Tobacco Tobacco Mosaic virus 1994 Bs2 Pepper Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (avrBs2) 1999 RRS-1 Arabidopsis Ralstonia solanacearum 2002 Pi-ta Rice Magnaporthe grisea(avrPita) 2000 Cf-9 Tomato Cladosporium fulvum(Avr9) 1994 Ve2 Tomato Verticillium albo-atrum 2001 Xa-21 Rice Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae 1995 Gururani et.al.,2012 Cloned R genes 9
  • 10.
    Features of Rgenes  Follows gene for gene hypothesis  Co-evolve  predominantly inherited  Highly polymorphic  Majority of them code for specific receptors (Proteins, enzymes, antimicrobial compounds) 10
  • 11.
    R gene –discovery approachesR gene – discovery approaches Map based cloning Molecular markers map + BAC libraries screening Transposon tagging Mutational R gene Enrichment Sequencing (MutRenSeq) 11
  • 12.
    Map based cloning It otherwise called as Positional Cloning.  First plant resistance gene (Pto) isolated using Map Based cloning  Using the genetic relationship between a gene and a marker as the basis of Map based cloning. 12
  • 13.
     Tomato Ptogene  Provides resistance against bacterial speck disease  Pseudomonas syringa pv  Rice Xa21 gene  Resistance to Bacterial blight disease  Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Rice pi9,pi2 gene  Resistance to Rice blast disease  Mangnaporthe grisea Examples Laborious, Time Consuming Expensive Skilled man power required Infra structure Limitations 13
  • 14.
    Transposon Tagging  Itwas first recognized by McClintock  It is an insertion based technique.  Transposon mutagenesis in plants has become an increasingly useful tool for gene discovery.  A transposable element is a DNA sequence that has the ability to change its location in the genome, i.e., it can transpose from one location to another in the genome. 14
  • 15.
    Transposon tagging describesisolation of genes using transposable elements as gene tags.  When a transposon integrates within a gene, the gene function is lost.  The inserted fragment is usually a well characterized transposable element, most of which has been sequenced Gene can be easily recognize by sequence of the inserted fragment. 15
  • 16.
    16 Steps involved inTransposon tagging
  • 17.
     Transposon tagginghas been used to isolate several genes in  Maize (e.g. A1, A2, BZ2, C1, C2, opaque2, R, P, etc.),  Tomato (cf-9, Dem, etc.)  Tobacco (cf-4A, N) A major limitation of the method is the low frequency of transposition. Most species lack active transposons Limitations: Examples : 17
  • 18.
    Mutational R geneENrichment Sequencing (MutRenSeq)  Scientists at the John Innes Centre (JIC) and The Sainsbury Laboratory (TSL) have pioneered a new gene detecting technology called MutRenSeq  It is used to accurately pinpoints the location of disease resistance genes in large plant genomes.  We can very quickly locate resistance genes from crops, clone them and stack multiple resistance genes into our elite variety.  It has reduced the time it takes to clone the genes into crops from 5 to 10 years down to 2 years. 18
  • 19.
  • 20.
     Using EthylMethane Sulfonate, a chemical known for causing genetic variations.  Mutagenized seeds called M1 generation, the plants are generated self pollinated and make M2 Families  EMS mutagenesis of resistant plant, creation of independent M2 families and screening for susceptible mutants EMS Mutagenesis 20
  • 21.
    R gene ENrichmentSequencing  RenSeq - involves capturing fragments from a genomic or cDNA library using biotinylated RNA oligonucleotides designed to be complementary to the NBS-LRR-encoding genes of a reference genome Target enrichment using a NBS-LRR–specific bait library and sequencing of the wild-type and susceptible mutants Sequences sources were derived from publicly available gene annotations 21
  • 22.
    A de novoassembly of the enriched sequences of the resistant wild type is used as a reference for mapping. Subsequent SNV and presence/absence calls are integration and scoring. Data analysis and candidate calling 22
  • 23.
    Wild type ResistantPlant Clear phenotype associated with single gene EMS screen and identify loss-of-function mutants Assumption of the structure of target gene (e.g. NB-LRR)  Advantages: No reference required No fine mapping No BAC library No problems due to suppressed recombination Time saving  Requirement 23
  • 24.
    Case StudyCase Study WheatRustWheat Rust (Puccinia triticina) (Puccinia striiformis) (Puccinia graminis) 24 Burkhard et al., Apr 2016.
  • 25.
    Wild type Resistantplant EMS 6 Susceptible mutants (1300 M2 Plants) RenSeq Wild-type & 6 mutants Data Analysis  Total mutations ~ 44 to 84  23 contigs that were mutated in 2 mutants  3 contigs that were mutated in 3 mutants  Single 3,408-bp contig, that contained independent mutations in 5 of the 6 mutants Wild-type assembly & Identified a contig carried mutation in N- terminal region of the same gene Joined the contigs to obtain the full-length sequence of the predicted open reading frame CandidateCandidate genegene (Sr22(Sr22)) 25 Work flow
  • 26.
    26 Susceptible Transgenic (Sr22) Sr22& Sr45 Validation Introgression (Sr45)
  • 27.
     Pesticides cancontrol these diseases but they are harmful to environment and very expensive.  Wild relatives of domesticated crops contain many useful disease resistance (R) genes. Introducing this natural resistance is an smart way of managing disease.  Benefits of using the plant resistance genes in resistance breeding programs include  Efficient reduction of pathogen growth,  Minimal damage to the host plant,  Zero input of pesticides from the farmers (Economical) Eco friendly nature of such crops  We have to adapt new technologies that helps to enhance the disease resistance and productivity. Conclusion 27
  • 28.

Editor's Notes

  • #7 The plant resistance proteins are classified based on the presence of conserved domains, which contain 14 groups (a, b, c…n) corresponding to different R protein types in Table 1 respectively. Three novel R proteins (Xa13, Xa5 and Xa27) do not contain any conserved motifs that are known in R proteins.
  • #11 . R genes offer an economical and environmentally responsible solution to control plant disease, and cloning of these genes would enable durable R gene deployment strategies. Xa4,5,13,21 Xa 4, xa 21 domin Xa 5 paritial dominace Xa 13 recessive
  • #17 1.Clone a known a gene with scorable phenotypic effect 2. TE is transposed to this gene to get an unstable allele (Mutant) 3. This unstable allele is cloned and TE is isolated from this unstable allelei 4.The TE is transposed to a gene of interest with known phenotypic effect, to produce unstable allele 4.The DNA extracted from this mutant 5.TE sequence is used as a probe to isolate and clone the mutant gene (carrying Inserted TE)
  • #20 3 Step Method: Creating mutants from resistant wild type plants and identifying those with loss of disease resistance, Sequencing genomes of both wild type resistant plants and those which have lost resistance comparing these genes in mutants and wild types to identify the exact mutations responsible for the loss of disease resistance
  • #21 MutRenSeq begins with creating mutations in wildtype Resistant plants resulting in a variety without that resistance EMS produces random mutations in genetic material by nucleotide substitution The Ethyl group of EMS reacts with guanine in DNA, Forming the abnormal base O-6-ethylguanine G:C become A:T (transition Mutation)
  • #22 Briefly, 500 ng of the prepared libraries were hybridized in hybridization buffer (10× SSPE, 10× Denhardt’s solution, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS) to the biotinylated RNA baits for 40 h at 65 °C. After hybridization, bound DNA was recovered using magnetic streptavidin-coated beads The enriched libraries were paired-end sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq
  • #23 Primary data from wild type used as a reference, Raw data of each mutant and wild type was aligned to the wild-type assembly De novo assembled wild-type contigs were aligned to source sequences of the bait library using BLASTn26 Using the mpileup format, potentially mutated nucleotide positions were identified
  • #25 Triticum boeoticum T. boeoticum and T. monococcum