DISEASE
FORECASTING
FORECASTING
Forecasting involves all the activities in ascertaining and
notifying the growers of community that conditions are
sufficiently favourable for certain diseases,that
application of control measures will result in economic
gain or on the other hand and just as important that the
amount expected is unlikely to be enough to justify the
expenditure of time, energy and money for control
Miller and O’Brien (1952 )
Disease Triangle
The plant disease triangle represents the
factors necessary for disease to occur
Pre-requisites for developing a Forecast System
 The crop must be a cash crop(economic yield)
 The disease must have potential to cause damage(yield
losses)
 The disease should not be regular (uncertainty)
 Effective and economic control known (options to
growers)
 Reliable means of communication with farmers
 Farmer should be adaptive and have purchase power
The principles of disease forecasting
based on
• The nature of the pathogen (monocyclic or polycyclic)
• Effects of the environment on stages of pathogen
development
• The response of the host to infection (age-related
resistance)
• Activities of the growers that affect the pathogen or
the host
6
Models for disease prediction
1. Empirical models-based on experience of growers
,the scientist or both.
2. Simulation models -based on theoretical
relationships
3. General circulation models (GCM)- based on fixed
changes in temperature or precipitation has been
used to predict the expansion range of some
diseases- not successful
Problems with use of such models:
o Model inputs have high degree of uncertainty
o Nonlinear relationships between climatic variables and
epidemic parameters
o Potential for adaptation of plants and pathogens
Uses of disease forecasts
Forewarning or assessment of disease important for crop
production management
 for timely plant protection measures
information whether the disease status is expected to be
below or above the threshold level is enough, models based
on qualitative data can be used – qualitative models
 loss assessment
forewarning actual intensity is required - quantitative model
 For making strategic decision-
Prediction of the risks involved in planting a certain crop.
Deciding about the need to apply strategic control measures
(soil treatment, planting a resistant cultivar, etc)
 For making tactical decision-
Deciding about the need to implement disease
management measure
 Plant pathologists and meteorologists have often
collaborated to develop disease forecasting or warning
systems that attempt to help growers make economic
decisions for managing diseases.
 These types of warning systems may consist of
supporting a producer’s decision making process for
determining cost and benefits for applying pesticides,
selecting seed or propagation materials, or whether to
plant a crop in a particular area.
History of forecasting systems
• 1911- One of the first attempts at predicting LB was
made by Lutman who concluded that epidemics were
favoured in wet and cold conditions.
• 1926- Van Everdingen in Holland proposed the first
‘model’ based on four climatic conditions necessary
for LB development:
 night temperatures below dew point for at least four
hours
 minimum temperature no lower than 10°C
 cloud cover the following day .
 rainfall in excess of 0.1 mm.
• 1933 -In England, Beaumont and Stanilund
emphasized the importance of humidity for late
blight occurrence. They considered a day humid when
the relative humidity at 3:00pm was higher than 75%
Conditions were even more favourable for LB
development with two consecutive humid days and
when the minimum temperature was not lower than
10°C.
• 1953- Burke described the ‘Irish rules’ that minimum
temperature no less than 10°C and relative humidity
no lower than 90% for 12 hours
• 1956- Smith period that the two consecutive days
with minimum temperatures above 10°C and at least
10 hours with relative humidity above 90%
• BLITECAST perhaps the best-known prediction
model, is a combination of two LB prediction models.
• SimCast is derived from a simulation model
describing the effects of climate, fungicide and host
resistance on Phytophthora infestans development.
• The latest generation of forecast systems includes
more factors and interactions for predicting LB (such
as the pathogen life cycle, weather conditions,
fungicides and host resistance. Among this type of
model are PROGEB, PhytoPRE, Negfry ,Prophy and
SIMPHYT .
successful plant disease forecasting
system
 Reliability -use of sound biological and environmental
data
 Simplicity - The simpler the system, the more likely it
will be applied and used by producers
 Importance -The disease is of economic importance
to the crop, but sporadic enough that the need for
treatment is not a given
 Usefulness -The forecasting model should be applied
when the disease and/or pathogen can be detected
reliably
 Availability -necessary information about the
components of the disease triangle should be
available
 Multipurpose applicability -monitoring and decision-
making tools for several diseases and pests should be
available
 Cost effectiveness -forecasting system should be
cost affordable relative to available disease
management tactics.
Stewart’s disease forecasting system
Stewart’s disease of corn, or
‘Stewart’s wilt,’ caused by is
Erwinia stewartii economically
important because its presence
within seed corn fields can prevent
the export of hybrid seed corn to
countries with phytosanitary
(quarantine) restrictions.
The corn flea beetle (Chaetocnema pulicaria ) plays an
important role in this pathosystem for two reasons:
• the bacterium survives the winter period in the gut of
adult corn flea beetles
• that are overwintering at the soil surface in grassy areas
surrounding fields
• the corn flea beetle is the primary means for
dissemination of the bacterium from plant to plant
• Warmer winter temperatures
during December, January, and
February generally allow
greater numbers of the insect
vector to survive, thereby
increasing the risk of Stewart’s
disease epidemics due to higher
levels of initial inoculum
(infested beetles) that will be
present during the ensuring
growing season.
Stevens-Boewe Stewart’s disease forecasting system
The development of an accurate and precise pre-plant
warning system that would identify high-risk seasons
and geographical locations within the corn belt would
be of tremendous economic benefit to hybrid corn
growers and companies.
Sclerotinia Stem Rot
forecasting
• Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) is
one of the most important diseases on spring-sown
oilseed rape.
• forecasting method of Sclerotinia stem rot has
been developed in Sweden.
• The method is mainly based upon a number of risk
factors, such as crop density, crop rotation.
• Level of previous Sclerotinia infestation (estimation
of inoculum in soil), time for apothecia formation
from sclerotia, rainfall during early summer and
during flowering and weather forecast.
Prediction of a monocyclic pathogen that complete only
one disease cycle in a growing season - direct prediction
No. of sclerotia in soil sample
Diseaseseverity
Soil sample
Sclerotia
Soil
Wilt disease in sugar beat induced by Sclerotium rolfsii
Consequences from predicting the severity of S.
rolfsii in sugar beat on grower’s actions
Many sclerotia in
the soil sample
Do not sow sugar
beat at all
Sow only resistant
cultivars
Apply soil
treatment
Few sclerotia in the
soil sample
Sow sugar beat as
planned
Temperature (o C)
DurationofRH>90%(hrs)
No disease
Severe disease
Apple scab induced by Venturia
inaequalis
1. Amount of initial
inoculum is high
(ascospores)
2. Only young leaves
are susceptible
3. Film of water on the
leaves and proper
temperatures are
needed for infection
Prediction of a polycyclic pathogen that complete
very few disease cycles in a growing season
Consequences from predicting the occurrence of infections
of apples by V. inaequalis on grower’s actions
Temperature (oC)
DurationofRH>90%(hrs)
No disease
Severe disease
No control
Protectant fungicide
Systemic fungicide
High dose of systemic
fungicide
Decision concerning the need for fungicide spraying is
made daily during the beginning of the season
Time
Diseaseseverity
(%)
Prediction of a polycyclic pathogen
1. Amount of initial
inoculum is very low
(infected tubers)
Potato late blight induced
by Phytophthora infestans
5. The time of disease
onset is governed by the
environment.
2. Disease progress rate
may be very high.
3. Potential loss - high.
4. Preventive sprays are
highly effective.
Prediction of the time of late blight onset
Hyre’s system
Late blight appears 7-14 days after
accumulation of 10 “rain favorable-days” since
emergence.
Average Temp. in the
last five days 7.2oC25.5o
C
“A rain-favorable day”
Rain quantity in the last
five days 30 mm
and
Prediction of the time of late blight onset
Wallin’s system
Late blight appears 7-14 days after
accumulation of 18-20 “severity values”
since emergence.
Temperature Hours with RH>90%
7.2 - 11.6
11.7 - 15.0
15.1 - 26.6
15
12
9
16-18
13-15
10-12
19-21
16-18
13-15
22-24
19-21
16-18
25+
22+
19+
Severity
values 0 1 2 3 4
Prediction of the subsequent development of
late blight and determining the need for
spraying
N
W
7d
5d
<3 3 4 5 6 >6
<4
>4
Severity values during the last 7 days
N N W 7d 7d 5d
N W 7d 5d 5d 5d
No. rain-favorable days
during the last 7 days
No spray
late blight warning
7-day spraying schedule
5-day spraying schedule
Recommendation
for action
Time
Hostresistance
1. Amount of initial inoculum
is very high (infected plant
debris)
2. The pathogen develops at
a wide range of conditions
3. Potential loss - low
4. Disease progress is
governed by the response of
the host
Prediction of disease development in
relation to host response to the pathogen
Potato early blight induced by
Alternaria solani
Botrytis rot in basil induced by Botrytis cinerea
2. The wounds are healed within
24 hours and are not further
susceptible for infection.
3. A drop of water is formed
(due to root pressure) on the cut
of the stem.
1. The pathogen invades the
plants through wounds that are
created during harvest.
Time
Diseaseseverity(%)rain
Harvests
Botrytis rot in basil induced by Botrytis cinerea
4. If humidity is high, the drop
remains for several hours.
5. During rain, growers do not
open the side opening of the
greenhouses.
6. Disease outbreaks occur
when harvest is done during a
rainy day.
Consequences from predicting grey mold
outbreaks in basil on disease
management
Time
Diseaseseverity(%)rain
Harvests
If harvesting is done during
rainy days, apply a fungicide
spray once, soon after harvest
To minimize the occurrence of
infection, harvesting should be
avoided during rainy days.
Geographic information system
• A GIS is a computer system designed to capture,
store, manipulate, analyze, manage and present all
types of spatial or geographical data
• GIS provide important tools that can be applied in
predicting, monitoring and controlling diseases
• GIS can be used to determine the spatial extent of a
disease, to identify spatial patterns of the disease
and to link the disease to auxiliary spatial data
• Use of GIS tools on data collected to identify critical
intervention areas to combat the spread of Banana
Xanthomonas wilt (BXW)
Infrastructure to calculate risk maps
met.
data
Geo.
data
combine with
GIS
Interpolation
Calculation of forecasting models with
interpolated input parameters
Presentation of results
step1
step 2
step 3
step 4
Wheat rust surveillance & monitoring methods
For effective control of wheat rusts, it is essential to carry out disease
surveillance and monitoring to obtain the information on the incidence of
the disease timely and accurately. Following three approaches are
generally used and being developed for wheat rust monitoring and crop
protection.
1. Phenotypic rust assessments
2. Biochemical and molecular detection
3. Remote sensing technology
 Monitoring of rust diseases is mainly done through field surveys by
human power, which is time-consuming, energy consuming and error
prone. The subjectivity of the monitoring results seriously affect the
accuracy of disease forecast.
 Biochemical and molecular detection is focusing on very early stage of
pathogen detection.
 Development and implementation of remote sensing technologies have
facilitated the direct detection of foliar diseases quickly,
conveniently, economically and accurately under field conditions.
Receiving station
processing
Archiving
Distribution
Levels of wheat rust monitoring using remote sensing technologies
In recent years, significant progress is made in
remote sensing technologies for monitoring
wheat rust at following four levels
 Single Leaf scale (ground based)
 Canopy scale (ground based)
 Field crop scale (aerial)
 Countries/regional scale (satellite based)
Remote sensing data at single leaf, canopy and
field crop scale levels provide local and limited
experimental information.
While satellite based remote sensing can
provide a sufficient and inexpensive data base
for rust over large wheat regions or at spatial
scale. It also offers the advantage of
continuously collected data and availability of
immediate or archived data sets..
EPIPRE
EPIPRE (EPidemics PREdiction and PREvention) is a system of
supervised control of diseases and pests in winter wheat.
The participating farmers do their own disease and
pest monitoring, simple and reliable observation and sampling
techniques.
Farmers send their field observations to the central team,
which enters them in the data bank. Field data are updated
daily by means of simplified simulation models. Expected
damage and loss are calculated and used in a decision system,
that leads to one of three major decisions :
• treat
• don't treat
• make another field observation
The start of EPIPRE in 1978 was promoted by the heavy
epidemics of yellow rust in 1975 and 1977 (Puccinia
striiformis Westend.
Rust development of epidemics
(RustDEp) is a dynamic simulator of the daily progress
of brown rust severity on wheat .
 the proportion of spores able to establish new
infections influenced by temperature and leaf
wetness
 the fact that the latent period depends on
temperature
 the fact that the infectious period depends on
temperature and host growth stage
In the RustDEp model, the inputs of meteorological
data are recorded by a weather station, allowing
more accurate simulation of the disease progress
Forecast of Phythphthora-blight (Pigeonpea) - Kanpur
0
20
40
60
80
100
2000-01 2001-02
Year
Average%incidence
observed forecast
Forecast of Bacterial blight in Akola (Cotton) - 2001 in different
SMW
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001
42 43 44
Year & Weeks
BacterialBlight(%)
Observed Forecast
Forecast of LLS and Rust (Groundnut) - Tirupati
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LLS
Kharif
LLS
Kharif
LLS
Kharif
LLS
Kharif
LLS
Kharif
LLS
Rabi
LLS
Rabi
LLS
Rabi
LLS
Rabi
Rust
Kharif
Rust
Kharif
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 2002 2003
DiseaseIndex
observed forecast
success of a forecasting
The success of a forecasting system depends,
among other things, on
The commonness of epidemics (or need to intervene)
The accuracy of predictions of epidemic risk (based on
weather in this example)
The ability to deliver predictions in a timely fashion
The ability to implement a control tactic (fungicide
application, for example)
The economic impact of using a predictive system
Thanks

Disease forcasting

  • 1.
  • 2.
    FORECASTING Forecasting involves allthe activities in ascertaining and notifying the growers of community that conditions are sufficiently favourable for certain diseases,that application of control measures will result in economic gain or on the other hand and just as important that the amount expected is unlikely to be enough to justify the expenditure of time, energy and money for control Miller and O’Brien (1952 )
  • 3.
    Disease Triangle The plantdisease triangle represents the factors necessary for disease to occur
  • 4.
    Pre-requisites for developinga Forecast System  The crop must be a cash crop(economic yield)  The disease must have potential to cause damage(yield losses)  The disease should not be regular (uncertainty)  Effective and economic control known (options to growers)  Reliable means of communication with farmers  Farmer should be adaptive and have purchase power
  • 5.
    The principles ofdisease forecasting based on • The nature of the pathogen (monocyclic or polycyclic) • Effects of the environment on stages of pathogen development • The response of the host to infection (age-related resistance) • Activities of the growers that affect the pathogen or the host
  • 6.
    6 Models for diseaseprediction 1. Empirical models-based on experience of growers ,the scientist or both. 2. Simulation models -based on theoretical relationships 3. General circulation models (GCM)- based on fixed changes in temperature or precipitation has been used to predict the expansion range of some diseases- not successful Problems with use of such models: o Model inputs have high degree of uncertainty o Nonlinear relationships between climatic variables and epidemic parameters o Potential for adaptation of plants and pathogens
  • 7.
    Uses of diseaseforecasts Forewarning or assessment of disease important for crop production management  for timely plant protection measures information whether the disease status is expected to be below or above the threshold level is enough, models based on qualitative data can be used – qualitative models  loss assessment forewarning actual intensity is required - quantitative model  For making strategic decision- Prediction of the risks involved in planting a certain crop. Deciding about the need to apply strategic control measures (soil treatment, planting a resistant cultivar, etc)
  • 8.
     For makingtactical decision- Deciding about the need to implement disease management measure  Plant pathologists and meteorologists have often collaborated to develop disease forecasting or warning systems that attempt to help growers make economic decisions for managing diseases.  These types of warning systems may consist of supporting a producer’s decision making process for determining cost and benefits for applying pesticides, selecting seed or propagation materials, or whether to plant a crop in a particular area.
  • 9.
    History of forecastingsystems • 1911- One of the first attempts at predicting LB was made by Lutman who concluded that epidemics were favoured in wet and cold conditions. • 1926- Van Everdingen in Holland proposed the first ‘model’ based on four climatic conditions necessary for LB development:  night temperatures below dew point for at least four hours  minimum temperature no lower than 10°C  cloud cover the following day .  rainfall in excess of 0.1 mm.
  • 10.
    • 1933 -InEngland, Beaumont and Stanilund emphasized the importance of humidity for late blight occurrence. They considered a day humid when the relative humidity at 3:00pm was higher than 75% Conditions were even more favourable for LB development with two consecutive humid days and when the minimum temperature was not lower than 10°C. • 1953- Burke described the ‘Irish rules’ that minimum temperature no less than 10°C and relative humidity no lower than 90% for 12 hours • 1956- Smith period that the two consecutive days with minimum temperatures above 10°C and at least 10 hours with relative humidity above 90%
  • 11.
    • BLITECAST perhapsthe best-known prediction model, is a combination of two LB prediction models. • SimCast is derived from a simulation model describing the effects of climate, fungicide and host resistance on Phytophthora infestans development. • The latest generation of forecast systems includes more factors and interactions for predicting LB (such as the pathogen life cycle, weather conditions, fungicides and host resistance. Among this type of model are PROGEB, PhytoPRE, Negfry ,Prophy and SIMPHYT .
  • 12.
    successful plant diseaseforecasting system  Reliability -use of sound biological and environmental data  Simplicity - The simpler the system, the more likely it will be applied and used by producers  Importance -The disease is of economic importance to the crop, but sporadic enough that the need for treatment is not a given  Usefulness -The forecasting model should be applied when the disease and/or pathogen can be detected reliably
  • 13.
     Availability -necessaryinformation about the components of the disease triangle should be available  Multipurpose applicability -monitoring and decision- making tools for several diseases and pests should be available  Cost effectiveness -forecasting system should be cost affordable relative to available disease management tactics.
  • 14.
    Stewart’s disease forecastingsystem Stewart’s disease of corn, or ‘Stewart’s wilt,’ caused by is Erwinia stewartii economically important because its presence within seed corn fields can prevent the export of hybrid seed corn to countries with phytosanitary (quarantine) restrictions. The corn flea beetle (Chaetocnema pulicaria ) plays an important role in this pathosystem for two reasons: • the bacterium survives the winter period in the gut of adult corn flea beetles • that are overwintering at the soil surface in grassy areas surrounding fields
  • 15.
    • the cornflea beetle is the primary means for dissemination of the bacterium from plant to plant • Warmer winter temperatures during December, January, and February generally allow greater numbers of the insect vector to survive, thereby increasing the risk of Stewart’s disease epidemics due to higher levels of initial inoculum (infested beetles) that will be present during the ensuring growing season.
  • 16.
    Stevens-Boewe Stewart’s diseaseforecasting system The development of an accurate and precise pre-plant warning system that would identify high-risk seasons and geographical locations within the corn belt would be of tremendous economic benefit to hybrid corn growers and companies.
  • 17.
    Sclerotinia Stem Rot forecasting •Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) is one of the most important diseases on spring-sown oilseed rape. • forecasting method of Sclerotinia stem rot has been developed in Sweden. • The method is mainly based upon a number of risk factors, such as crop density, crop rotation. • Level of previous Sclerotinia infestation (estimation of inoculum in soil), time for apothecia formation from sclerotia, rainfall during early summer and during flowering and weather forecast.
  • 18.
    Prediction of amonocyclic pathogen that complete only one disease cycle in a growing season - direct prediction No. of sclerotia in soil sample Diseaseseverity Soil sample Sclerotia Soil Wilt disease in sugar beat induced by Sclerotium rolfsii
  • 19.
    Consequences from predictingthe severity of S. rolfsii in sugar beat on grower’s actions Many sclerotia in the soil sample Do not sow sugar beat at all Sow only resistant cultivars Apply soil treatment Few sclerotia in the soil sample Sow sugar beat as planned
  • 20.
    Temperature (o C) DurationofRH>90%(hrs) Nodisease Severe disease Apple scab induced by Venturia inaequalis 1. Amount of initial inoculum is high (ascospores) 2. Only young leaves are susceptible 3. Film of water on the leaves and proper temperatures are needed for infection Prediction of a polycyclic pathogen that complete very few disease cycles in a growing season
  • 21.
    Consequences from predictingthe occurrence of infections of apples by V. inaequalis on grower’s actions Temperature (oC) DurationofRH>90%(hrs) No disease Severe disease No control Protectant fungicide Systemic fungicide High dose of systemic fungicide Decision concerning the need for fungicide spraying is made daily during the beginning of the season
  • 22.
    Time Diseaseseverity (%) Prediction of apolycyclic pathogen 1. Amount of initial inoculum is very low (infected tubers) Potato late blight induced by Phytophthora infestans 5. The time of disease onset is governed by the environment. 2. Disease progress rate may be very high. 3. Potential loss - high. 4. Preventive sprays are highly effective.
  • 23.
    Prediction of thetime of late blight onset Hyre’s system Late blight appears 7-14 days after accumulation of 10 “rain favorable-days” since emergence. Average Temp. in the last five days 7.2oC25.5o C “A rain-favorable day” Rain quantity in the last five days 30 mm and
  • 24.
    Prediction of thetime of late blight onset Wallin’s system Late blight appears 7-14 days after accumulation of 18-20 “severity values” since emergence. Temperature Hours with RH>90% 7.2 - 11.6 11.7 - 15.0 15.1 - 26.6 15 12 9 16-18 13-15 10-12 19-21 16-18 13-15 22-24 19-21 16-18 25+ 22+ 19+ Severity values 0 1 2 3 4
  • 25.
    Prediction of thesubsequent development of late blight and determining the need for spraying N W 7d 5d <3 3 4 5 6 >6 <4 >4 Severity values during the last 7 days N N W 7d 7d 5d N W 7d 5d 5d 5d No. rain-favorable days during the last 7 days No spray late blight warning 7-day spraying schedule 5-day spraying schedule Recommendation for action
  • 26.
    Time Hostresistance 1. Amount ofinitial inoculum is very high (infected plant debris) 2. The pathogen develops at a wide range of conditions 3. Potential loss - low 4. Disease progress is governed by the response of the host Prediction of disease development in relation to host response to the pathogen Potato early blight induced by Alternaria solani
  • 27.
    Botrytis rot inbasil induced by Botrytis cinerea 2. The wounds are healed within 24 hours and are not further susceptible for infection. 3. A drop of water is formed (due to root pressure) on the cut of the stem. 1. The pathogen invades the plants through wounds that are created during harvest.
  • 28.
    Time Diseaseseverity(%)rain Harvests Botrytis rot inbasil induced by Botrytis cinerea 4. If humidity is high, the drop remains for several hours. 5. During rain, growers do not open the side opening of the greenhouses. 6. Disease outbreaks occur when harvest is done during a rainy day.
  • 29.
    Consequences from predictinggrey mold outbreaks in basil on disease management Time Diseaseseverity(%)rain Harvests If harvesting is done during rainy days, apply a fungicide spray once, soon after harvest To minimize the occurrence of infection, harvesting should be avoided during rainy days.
  • 30.
    Geographic information system •A GIS is a computer system designed to capture, store, manipulate, analyze, manage and present all types of spatial or geographical data • GIS provide important tools that can be applied in predicting, monitoring and controlling diseases • GIS can be used to determine the spatial extent of a disease, to identify spatial patterns of the disease and to link the disease to auxiliary spatial data • Use of GIS tools on data collected to identify critical intervention areas to combat the spread of Banana Xanthomonas wilt (BXW)
  • 31.
    Infrastructure to calculaterisk maps met. data Geo. data combine with GIS Interpolation Calculation of forecasting models with interpolated input parameters Presentation of results step1 step 2 step 3 step 4
  • 32.
    Wheat rust surveillance& monitoring methods For effective control of wheat rusts, it is essential to carry out disease surveillance and monitoring to obtain the information on the incidence of the disease timely and accurately. Following three approaches are generally used and being developed for wheat rust monitoring and crop protection. 1. Phenotypic rust assessments 2. Biochemical and molecular detection 3. Remote sensing technology  Monitoring of rust diseases is mainly done through field surveys by human power, which is time-consuming, energy consuming and error prone. The subjectivity of the monitoring results seriously affect the accuracy of disease forecast.  Biochemical and molecular detection is focusing on very early stage of pathogen detection.  Development and implementation of remote sensing technologies have facilitated the direct detection of foliar diseases quickly, conveniently, economically and accurately under field conditions.
  • 33.
    Receiving station processing Archiving Distribution Levels ofwheat rust monitoring using remote sensing technologies In recent years, significant progress is made in remote sensing technologies for monitoring wheat rust at following four levels  Single Leaf scale (ground based)  Canopy scale (ground based)  Field crop scale (aerial)  Countries/regional scale (satellite based) Remote sensing data at single leaf, canopy and field crop scale levels provide local and limited experimental information. While satellite based remote sensing can provide a sufficient and inexpensive data base for rust over large wheat regions or at spatial scale. It also offers the advantage of continuously collected data and availability of immediate or archived data sets..
  • 34.
    EPIPRE EPIPRE (EPidemics PREdictionand PREvention) is a system of supervised control of diseases and pests in winter wheat. The participating farmers do their own disease and pest monitoring, simple and reliable observation and sampling techniques. Farmers send their field observations to the central team, which enters them in the data bank. Field data are updated daily by means of simplified simulation models. Expected damage and loss are calculated and used in a decision system, that leads to one of three major decisions : • treat • don't treat • make another field observation The start of EPIPRE in 1978 was promoted by the heavy epidemics of yellow rust in 1975 and 1977 (Puccinia striiformis Westend.
  • 35.
    Rust development ofepidemics (RustDEp) is a dynamic simulator of the daily progress of brown rust severity on wheat .  the proportion of spores able to establish new infections influenced by temperature and leaf wetness  the fact that the latent period depends on temperature  the fact that the infectious period depends on temperature and host growth stage In the RustDEp model, the inputs of meteorological data are recorded by a weather station, allowing more accurate simulation of the disease progress
  • 36.
    Forecast of Phythphthora-blight(Pigeonpea) - Kanpur 0 20 40 60 80 100 2000-01 2001-02 Year Average%incidence observed forecast
  • 37.
    Forecast of Bacterialblight in Akola (Cotton) - 2001 in different SMW 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 2000 2001 2000 2001 2000 2001 42 43 44 Year & Weeks BacterialBlight(%) Observed Forecast
  • 38.
    Forecast of LLSand Rust (Groundnut) - Tirupati 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LLS Kharif LLS Kharif LLS Kharif LLS Kharif LLS Kharif LLS Rabi LLS Rabi LLS Rabi LLS Rabi Rust Kharif Rust Kharif 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 2002 2003 DiseaseIndex observed forecast
  • 39.
    success of aforecasting The success of a forecasting system depends, among other things, on The commonness of epidemics (or need to intervene) The accuracy of predictions of epidemic risk (based on weather in this example) The ability to deliver predictions in a timely fashion The ability to implement a control tactic (fungicide application, for example) The economic impact of using a predictive system
  • 40.