This document provides an overview of somatoform disorders, including their history, conceptualization, theories, and specific disorders. It discusses somatization disorder, conversion disorder, pain disorder, hypochondriasis, and body dysmorphic disorder. It covers theories of abnormal illness behavior and deficits in cognitive processing of emotion. It also presents a signal filtering model of somatoform symptoms and explores the psychobiological theories involving the endocrine system, immune system, neurotransmitters, and brain mechanisms.
This presentation is about geriatric Psychiatry awareness. it contains basic information about what is geriatric psychiatry, which are the main psychiatry disorder found in elderly and how to manage them?. it contains some detailed information about late life depression, delirium and dementia in geriatric population.
Classification in Psychiatry
The concept, reliability, validity, advantages and disadvantages of different classification systems, controversies in psychiatry classification
This presentation is about geriatric Psychiatry awareness. it contains basic information about what is geriatric psychiatry, which are the main psychiatry disorder found in elderly and how to manage them?. it contains some detailed information about late life depression, delirium and dementia in geriatric population.
Classification in Psychiatry
The concept, reliability, validity, advantages and disadvantages of different classification systems, controversies in psychiatry classification
This slide contains information regarding Psychosomatic Disorders. This can be helpful for proficiency level and bachelor level nursing students. Your feedback is highly appreciated.
The somatoform disorders are a group of psychological disorders in which a patient experiences physical symptoms that are inconsistent with or cannot be fully explained by any underlying general medical or neurologic condition. Medically unexplained physical symptoms account for as many as 50% of new medical outpatient visits. [1] Physical symptoms or painful complaints of unknown etiology are fairly common in pediatric populations. [2] Many healthy young children express emotional distress in terms of physical pain, such as stomachaches or headaches, but these complaints are usually transient and do not effect the child's overall functioning. The somatoform disorders represent the severe end of a continuum of somatic symptoms.
Somatization in children consists of the persistent experience and complaints of somatic distress that cannot be fully explained by a medical diagnosis. They can be represented by a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from mild self-limited symptoms, such as stomachache and headache, to chronic disabling symptoms, such as seizures and paralysis. These psychological disorders are often difficult to approach and complex to understand. It is important to note that these symptoms are not intentionally produced or under voluntary control.
In somatoform disorders, somatic symptoms become the focus of children and their families. They generally interfere with school, home life, and peer relationships. These youngsters are more likely to be considered sickly or health impaired by parents and caretakers, to be absent from school, and to perform poorly in academics. Somatization is often associated temporarily with psychosocial stress and can persist even after the acute stressor has resolved, resulting in the belief by the child and his or her family that the correct medical diagnosis has not yet been found. Thus, patients and families may continue to seek repeated medical treatment after being informed that no acute physical illness has been found and that the symptoms cannot be fully explained by a general medical condition. When somatization occurs in the context of a physical illness, it is identified by symptoms that go beyond the expected pathophysiology of the physical illness.
Recurrent complaints often present as diagnostic and treatment dilemmas to the primary care practitioner (PCP) who is trying to make sense of these symptoms. The PCP may feel poorly prepared and/or may have little time to assess or treat the somatic concerns. While the more disabling somatic complaints are more likely to be referred to a mental health professional, these youngsters presenting with these disabling physical symptoms bridge both medical and psychological domains and present a puzzling quandary for professionals from either field if working with them alone. [3] The nature of these symptoms requires an integrated medical and psychiatric treatment approach to successfully decrease the impairment caused by these disorders.
This slide contains information regarding Psychosomatic Disorders. This can be helpful for proficiency level and bachelor level nursing students. Your feedback is highly appreciated.
The somatoform disorders are a group of psychological disorders in which a patient experiences physical symptoms that are inconsistent with or cannot be fully explained by any underlying general medical or neurologic condition. Medically unexplained physical symptoms account for as many as 50% of new medical outpatient visits. [1] Physical symptoms or painful complaints of unknown etiology are fairly common in pediatric populations. [2] Many healthy young children express emotional distress in terms of physical pain, such as stomachaches or headaches, but these complaints are usually transient and do not effect the child's overall functioning. The somatoform disorders represent the severe end of a continuum of somatic symptoms.
Somatization in children consists of the persistent experience and complaints of somatic distress that cannot be fully explained by a medical diagnosis. They can be represented by a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from mild self-limited symptoms, such as stomachache and headache, to chronic disabling symptoms, such as seizures and paralysis. These psychological disorders are often difficult to approach and complex to understand. It is important to note that these symptoms are not intentionally produced or under voluntary control.
In somatoform disorders, somatic symptoms become the focus of children and their families. They generally interfere with school, home life, and peer relationships. These youngsters are more likely to be considered sickly or health impaired by parents and caretakers, to be absent from school, and to perform poorly in academics. Somatization is often associated temporarily with psychosocial stress and can persist even after the acute stressor has resolved, resulting in the belief by the child and his or her family that the correct medical diagnosis has not yet been found. Thus, patients and families may continue to seek repeated medical treatment after being informed that no acute physical illness has been found and that the symptoms cannot be fully explained by a general medical condition. When somatization occurs in the context of a physical illness, it is identified by symptoms that go beyond the expected pathophysiology of the physical illness.
Recurrent complaints often present as diagnostic and treatment dilemmas to the primary care practitioner (PCP) who is trying to make sense of these symptoms. The PCP may feel poorly prepared and/or may have little time to assess or treat the somatic concerns. While the more disabling somatic complaints are more likely to be referred to a mental health professional, these youngsters presenting with these disabling physical symptoms bridge both medical and psychological domains and present a puzzling quandary for professionals from either field if working with them alone. [3] The nature of these symptoms requires an integrated medical and psychiatric treatment approach to successfully decrease the impairment caused by these disorders.
Biological Approach in explaining Abnormality & Psychological DisordersSandra Arenillo
Following the Biopsychosocial Model of Psychological Disorders. The presentation will discuss the Biological Basis for Abnormality & Psychological Disorders
Psychiatry is the branch of medicine focused on the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of mental, emotional and behavioral disorders
Schizophrenia , psychosis, bipolar disorder are different type of psychiatric disorder
Features of schizophrenia are delusions and hallucinations
Bipolar affective disorder is one of the most common psychiatric illness
elevated mood and pressured speech are clinical features of bipolar disorder
Cutting (1997) provided a framework wherein he classified emotional disorders based on intensity, duration, timing, quality of experience, expression and appropriateness to the object or social setting.
Concept of Neurosis and Psychosis. Differences between these psychiatric disorders. It is an important topic for students belongs disciplines such as psychiatry, psychology, psychiatric nursing and psychiatric social work.
This is a ppt explaining the symptoms and diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia, along with possible treatment methods. The information provided is based entirey on DSM-5.
This PPT aims to help learner about mental health, Causes of Mental health, Types of Mental illness, Anxiety disorder, Mood disorder, Personality Disorder, schizophrenia, Eating Disorder, substance use Disorder, obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...University of Maribor
Slides from talk:
Aleš Zamuda: Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intelligent Systems.
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Inter-Society Networking Panel GRSS/MTT-S/CIS Panel Session: Promoting Connection and Cooperation
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
2. OVERVIEW
HISTORICAL EVOLUTION AND CURRENT CONCEPTUALISATION
THEORIES OF SOMATOFORM DISORDER
A SIGNAL FILTERING MODEL OF SOMATOFORM SYMPTOMS
SOMATIZATION DISORDER
CONVERSION DISORDER
PAIN DISORDER
HYPOCHONDRIASIS
BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER
FICTITIOUS DISORDER
3. HISTORY OF SOMATOFORM
DISORDERS
• Somatoform disorders are the borderland between ‘medicine and psychiatry’.
In neuroscience it is referred to as ‘body-brain interface’.
• Lipowsky (1986) stated that somatization is a tendency to experience and
express psychological distress in the form of somatic concerns.
• Kellener (1986) is of the opinion that somatization is not a single entity but they
are found in different diagnostic categories such as depression, anxiety and
somatoform disorders.
4. TERMS
Illness: It is a
subjective perception
of being unwell and
maybe unrelated to
the presence of an
objectifiable disease.
Disease: It is defined as
the presence of objective
biological abnormalities
in the structure and/or
function of the bodily
organs or system.
Sick role: A sociological
construct referring to a
role granted to an
individual by society
with accompanying
privileges and
obligations.
5. CONCEPTUALIZATION
It is conceptualized as a process of responding to stress.
An important concept to focus here is on somatosensory amplification where the symptoms
are experienced as intense and disturbing.
It consists of 3 elements
(1) hypervigilance
(2) selecting out some sensations and focusing on them
(3) intensification of this by cognition and affect.
6. Somatization
disorders
clinical and public
health problem
social dysfunction
occupational
difficulties
As a masked psychiatric disorder: depression, anxiety.
Amplified personal perceptual style: as a result of a personality trait or it can be
because of abnormal psychological processing
Seeking care for emotional distress
Somatization disorder can be viewed in 3 ways
7. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PSYCHOSOMATIC,
SOMATOFORM AND SOMATIZATION
DISORDERS
PSYCHOSOMATIC
Psychosomatic
disorders deals with the
relation between
psychological and
physiological factors in
the causation or
maintenance of disease
states
SOMATOFORM
Somatoform disorders
have in common the
presence of one or more
physical complaints for
which an adequate
physical explanation
cannot he found
8. Psychosomatic illnesses can be classified in
three general forms.
1) Mental illness
and a medical
one
2)Psychiatric
issue
3) Somatoform
disorders
9. There is a mental aspect to every physical disease.
There may be physical effects from mental illness.
Some physical diseases are thought to be especially prone to be worsened by
mental factors such as anxiety and stress
The term, 'psychosomatic disorder,' when mental factors cause physical
symptoms, but where there is no physical disease.
10. THEORIES OF SOMATOFORM
DISORDERS
1. ABNORMAL ILLNESS BEHAVIOUR
• Pillowsky defined this concept of abnormal illness behavior as the
“persistence of a maladaptive mode of experiencing, perceiving and
evaluating one’s own health status despite the fact that the doctor has
provided a lucid and accurate appraisal of the situation and
management to be followed with opportunities for discussion,
negotiation and clarification based on relevant biological, social and
cultural factors”
• Abnormal illness behavior that is somatically focused is divided into
1. ILLNESS-AFFIRMING
2.ILLNESS-DENYING
12. TABLE 1: Somatically focused abnormal
illness behavior
A. Motivation predominantly
conscious
• Malingering
• Chronic factitious syndrome with
physical symptoms (Munchausen
syndrome)
• Factitious disorder with physical
symptoms
B. Motivation predominantly
unconscious
• Neurotic (somatoform disorder)
• Somatization disorder
• Conversion disorder
• Somatoform pain disorder
• Hypochondriasis
• Body dysmorphic disorder
2.Hypochondriacal delusions
associated with
• Major depressive disorder with
mood congruent psychotic features
• Schizophrenic disorder
• Monosymptomatic hypochondriacal
psychoses
ILLNESS AFFRIMING
13. TABLE 2: Somatically focused abnormal
illness behavior.
A. Motivation predominantly
conscious
• Denial to obtain employment
• Denial to avoid feared therapies
• Denial of illness (e.g.VD)due to
shame and guilt
B. Motivation predominantly
unconscious
1.Neurotic e.g.:
• Non-compliance following
myocardial infarction
• Counterphobic behavior in
hemophilia
• Non-compliance with
antihypertensive therapy
2. Psychotic:
• Denial of somatic pathology.e.g. as
part of hypomanic or schizophrenic
disorder
3.Neuropsychiatric
• Anosognosia
ILLNESS DENYING
14. TABLE 3: Psychologically abnormal
illness behavior
ILLNESS AFFRIMING
A. Motivation predominantly
conscious
• Malingering
• Factitious disorder with
psychological symptoms (Ganser
syndrome)
B. Motivation predominantly
unconscious
1. Neurotic
• Psychic hypochondriasis
• Phrenophobia
• Dissociative reactions
• Psychogenic amnesia
2. Psychotic
• Delusions of memory loss or loss of
brain function
15. TABLE 4: Psychologically Focused Abnormal
Illness Behavior
A. Motivation predominantly
conscious
• Denial of psychotic symptomatology
to avoid stigma, hospital admission,
to gain discharge from care.
• Denial of psychotic illness to avoid
discrimination by health care
professionals or employers.
B. Motivation predominantly
unconscious
• Neurotic: refusal to accept
'psychological' diagnosis or treatment
in the presence of neurotic illness,
personality disorder of dependency
syndromes (alcohol, opiates, etc.)
• Psychotic: Denial of illness ('lack of
insight') in psychotic depression,
manic states and schizophrenia
syndromes
• Neuropsychiatric: Confabulatory
reaction in Korsakoff s psychosis and
other organic brain syndromes.
ILLNESS DENYING
16. In neurotic abnormal illness behavior the major forms of recognized patterns
are hypochondriacal reactions, and conversion reactions.
The main difference between Hypochondriacal and conversion disorder is that
in the former the patient shows concern or worry about his/her symptoms
where in the latter the patient presents no worry or anxiety about the
symptoms and presents it blandly.
Pilowsky maintains that abnormal illness behavior is not a diagnosis but a
disagreement between the doctor and the patient about the sick role to which
the patient feels entitled.
17. DEFICITS IN COGNITIVE
PROCESSING OF EMOTION
An important concept of focus here is ‘Alexithymia’. This concept was coined by
Sifenos in 1973.
18. This specific disability is due to a combination neurophysiological of and psychological defects rather
than purely psychological ones. (Sifneos,1973)
Key features of Alexithymia according to Sifneos
a relative constriction of emotional functioning
poverty of fantasy of life
inability to find appropriate words to describe their emotions
neurophysiological psychological defects
19. According to a research carried out (Taylor,2000; Taylor, Bagby and Parker,1997) Alexithymia is a
specific disturbance in the affective-emotional processing which has 3 salient features
(a) Difficulty in identifying and describing feelings and emotions verbally
(b) Difficulty in distinguishing between feelings and somatic sensations
that accompany emotional arousal
(c) External oriented thinking and symbolic activity
20. Because of the deficit in cognitive processing of emotions , the emotions remain undifferentiated
and poorly regulated.
It has been hypothesized that the limited emotional awareness and cognitive processing of affects
lead to prolonged and amplifies the physiological and neurovegetative reactivity to stress which in
turn can potentially disturb the autonomic, pituitary-adrenal and immune system ( Infrasaca,1997:
Martin &Phil, 1986: Martinez-Sanchez, 1999: Papciak, Feuerstein & Spiegel, 1985)
Alexithymia individual’s have deficit cognitive functioning which makes it difficult for them to
differentiate the emotions that they are experiencing as well as the intensity of the emotion.
The disturbance in the cognitive processing of emotional awareness interferes with the subjects
ability to express and experience emotions.
21. Earlier Alexithymia was seen as a psychodynamic concept which has now evolved into a
deficit in the cognitive processing of emotions. (Taylor, Bagby & Parker, 1990)
Apart from being a concept of ‘psychosomatic’ problems alexithymia can also be a secondary
feature of any kind of psychological trauma.
PROLONGED STATES OF
EMOTIONAL AROUSAL
INCREASES LIKELIHOOD
OF DISEASES
22. PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL THEORIES
The psychobiological theory of chronic pain proposed by Flor et.al in 1990
helps us in understanding the complex interactions between the various
systems that leads to the onset and maintenance of somatoform disorders.
Somatoform disorders are not strictly mental events but they are associated
with a diversity of biological processes.
Endocrine system, amino acids, immune system, neurotransmitters is involved
in the onset and maintenance of somatoform disorders.
23. SOMATOFORM SYMPTOMS AND IMMUNOLOGY
Some immune parameters seem to be associated with the subjective feeling of being ill.
Activation of the immune system seems to induce behavior patterns that are similar to the illness
behavior seen in depression and somatization.
A study conducted by Danzter on rats showed that injecting the proinflammatory cytokine induced
sickness behavior in the rats such as withdrawal and reduced social activity.
IMMUNE
STIMULATION
ACTIVATES
ANALGESIA -
HYPERALGESIA
CIRCUITRY
24. AUTONOMIC PHYSIOLOGICAL AROUSAL
Heightened physiological activity can result in somatoform symptoms. When there is an increase
in the physiological activity it can lead to a misattribution of bodily signals.
Though it is evident that perception is largely influenced by psychological factors, physiological
activation of factors such as a variation in the heart rate can have an independent role.
Based on this theory Pennebaker suggests that there is a direct relationship between the intensity
of physiological signals and the severity of somatoform symptoms.
25. ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
The endocrine system, in particular the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA), is activated by stress and
also influences pain perception. Stress and pain perception are both relevant to somatoform disorders.
Cortisol in particular was studied and it was found that distressed patients with ‘unexplained’ physical
symptoms showed a tendency for hypercortisolism.
Cushing’s syndrome or hypercortisolism is a hormonal disorder caused by prolonged exposure of the body's
tissues to high levels of the hormone cortisol.
Whereas another study carried out by Gaab and others confirmed normal cortisol concentrations in
somatoform-associated disorders (chronic fatigue syndrome).
26. MONOAMINO ACIDS AND NEUROTANSMITTERS
The concentration of branched chain amino acids such as valine , leucine differs in patients with
somatoform disorders with reduced concentrations which was more pronounced in people with
somatization than depression.
These amino acids are competing with other amino acids such as tryptophan in the blood-brain barrier.
These are relevant for energy metabolism in the muscles which might be responsible for the subjective
feeling of weakness which is one of the most common symptom of not just somatization but somatoform
associated disorders.
27. BRAIN MECHANISMS
The conscious perception of symptoms takes place in the brain.
Evoked potentials reflect both attention and filtering processes.
Modern imaging techniques have been used in pain research. These include the spinal cord, brain
stem, hippocampus, amygdala It can be expected that some of these areas are involved in the
perception of somatoform symptoms.
Attention and perception processes in somatoform disorders have been studied ( Gordon et.al,1986
James et.al; 1990). The results showed that there might be deficits in the filtering process.
Only recently, brain imaging techniques have been used to somatoform disorders.
28. A SIGNAL FILTERING MODEL OF
SOMATOFORM SYMPTOMS
Somatoform disorders can be understood as the disorders in the perception of bodily signals.
A signal filtering model can be used to understand the development of the signal, filtering and processing.
The assumption is that most body parts send sensory signals to the brain but due to the neural filtering most of the
signals are evaded from the conscious of a healthy person.
In somatoform disorders physical sensations are perceived and interfere with planned behavior and intentional
thinking.
Consequently, reasons for these perceptions can be either amplified sensory signals, reduced filtering capacities or
even further factors influencing the strength of the signal or the capacity of sensory filters.
30. SOMATIZATION DISORDER
Multiple physical symptoms without clear or known physical causes are the
main feature of somatization disorder.
This condition may last for many years and in some cases the entire adult life
span.
DSM-IV requires at least 4 pain symptoms, 1 sexual symptom and 1 pseudo
neurological symptom to make the diagnosis.
31. CONTEMPORARY THEORETICAL
PERSEPCTIVES
Patients with somatization disorder are considered to constitute a relatively small subset of patients with
multiple functional symptoms.
Selective perception of and attention to somatic symptoms
Somatosensory amplification.
Means of communication.
32. Self-handicapping strategy
An important factor that contributes to the maintenance of somatic symptoms is the reinforcement of
the sick role.
Iatrogenic factors
Perceptual, behavioral mechanisms
33. ETIOLOGY AND COURSE
The onset of somatization disorder lies in early adulthood and the course of problem is often chronic.
Sexual abuse and traumatization are frequently cited as precursors of somatization disorder.
Somatization is often correlated with frequent absences from work or school, overuse of medical care
and excessive use of drugs and alcohol.
34. CONVERSION DISORDER
Patients with conversion disorder present symptoms that suggest neurological
disorder although appropriate medical investigations fail to identify a
neurological.
These symptoms are inconsistent with general neurological knowledge.
A classic example is ‘ glove anesthesia’ in with the patient complains of
numbness of the hand however such sensation does not conform with the
body’s innervation pattern.
DSM-IV describes 4 types of conversion disorder
Motor symptoms or deficits
Seizures or convulsions
Sensory symptom or deficit
A mixed presentation
35. An important requirement for the diagnosis is the temporal relation between conversion symptoms and a
psychological stressor such as acute grief or victimization.
Although most patients with CD express acute distress over their symptoms, some manifest an indifference or
lack of worry about their symptoms. This is called as la belle indifference.
36. CONTEMPORARY THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
There are few theoretical accounts of CD that are supported by research
evidence.
Behavioral model
Sociocultural influences.
Fail to habituate to stressful stimuli
Show more anxious arousal
37. Conversion symptoms occur more on the left rather than the right side of the body showing they could be
linked to neurophysiological emotional arousal. (refer notes)
According to the psychodynamic model, the symptoms are a consequence of emotional conflict, with the
repression of conflict into the unconscious.
Other theory - attachment theory as a means to understanding conversion disorder in terms of the freeze
response and the appeasement defense behavior seen in animal subjects.
38. The patient has been postulated to derive primary and secondary gain.
With secondary gain, symptoms allow the patient to avoid unpleasant situations or garner support from
friends, family, and the medical system that would otherwise be unobtainable.
According to sociocultural theories, the direct expression of emotions is impermissible and somatization
takes its place.
In behavioral models, conversion symptoms are viewed as a learned maladaptive behavior that is
reinforced by the environment.
UNCONSCIO
USLY
SUPPRESSED
CONFLICTS
ALLOWS
PATIENTS
TO EXPRESS
PRIMARY
GAIN
39. Preexisting neurologic disease.
The simultaneous occurrence of organic brain disease with conversion symptoms is also observed,
most notably in observation of high rates of organic seizure syndromes associated with psychogenic
nonepileptic seizures (PNES).
Familial studies have also shown that conversion symptoms in first-degree female relatives are up to
14 times greater than in the general population.
40. ETIOLOGY AND COURSE
. Although conversion disorder can occur at any age the onset is typically in late childhood
or early adulthood.
Onset is sudden and in response to conflicts or stressful situations such as unresolved grief
and sexual trauma.
The course of CD is believed to be vary from very brief to several weeks but longitudinal
studies showing the same is scarce.
41. PAIN DISORDER
In pain disorder, severe acute or chronic pain in one or more body parts is not
entirely or adequately explained by a known medical condition.
Pain is a subjective phenomenon and psychological factors such as mood,
anxiety, and attention maybe involved in the onset, maintenance and
exacerbation of pain and complicate differential diagnosis.
Chronic Pain in particular is associated with major changes in behavior such as
decreased activity and somatic preoccupation.
ACUTE PAIN- LESS THAN 6 MONTHS
CHRONIC PAIN- PERSISTS MORE THAN 6 MONTHS
43. Respondent and operant conditioning in pain disorder
The two may interact from the onset of pain behavior though its development.
For example, Avoidance of physical activity can lead to muscle fibers loosing elasticity and
shortening. This can be very painful and as a result people tend to avoid physical activity.
Such avoidance is negatively reinforced when they lead to the short-term decrease of pain.
Long term cost is frequently incurred because avoidance and escape may exacerbate the
physical condition of the individual thus resulting in a vicious cycle.
Pain behavior is
reinforced with
alternative behavior
Future pain behavior
increases
Future healthy
behavior decreases.
44. Cognitive-behavioral conceptualization of pain
Pain behavior is due to negative or unrealistically high expectations about experiencing pain as
well as low levels of perceived competence to deal with pain.
These cognitions often lead to avoidance of particular situations which may result in further
negative expectations regarding the ability to control future onset and cope with pain
Differences in the coping styles are particularly important for the resultant perception of pain
and associated mood states and this may also affect the impact of the pain stimulus.
Coping behavior seems to be directly influenced by a person’s perceived level of competence and
indirectly through pain intensity and pain related anxiety and depression.
45. Example:
Conversely, individuals who trust in their abilities to cope adequately with pain are more likely to
engage in adaptive behavior irrespective of how anxious they are and such persons do not suffer as
much as individual's with low perceived competence.
Decrease in competence
Increases pain intensity
Increases pain emotion
Leads to maladaptive behavior.
46. BIOPSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL
A model proposed by Flor et.al (1990) is a particularly promising example of a comprehensive
psychobiological theory of chronic pain.
Psychological
Motor-behavioral
Physiological
47. Flor and her colleagues proposed that stress may precipitate and facilitate a particular pain disorder to which
the individual is already predisposed on an unlearned and learned basis.
The learned aspect of this predisposition consists of reduced threshold for nociceptive activation due to
previous trauma or social learning experiences resulting in physiological response stereotype of a specific
body system or group of muscles
Example:
Individuals with heart focused anxiety and noncardiac chest pain may habitually respond to stress and pain
with increases in muscular tension and sympathetic activation that may over time lead to learned changes in
nociceptive sensitivity and input of chest muscles.
49. ETIOLOGY AND COURSE
Among pain patients there is a high frequency of prior physical abuse, sexual abuse and other
personality traits.
According to Engel(1959) individuals with pain disorder involve in frequent depression, pessimism
and an unconscious belief that happiness is not deserved.
Occupational factors can also lead to pain when there is the overuse of a single body part.
There is no data yet to show pain patients to be a homogenous group of individuals. So, instead many
researchers have been looking for subgroups with different psychological profiles.
50. HYPOCHONDRIASIS
It is characterized by unjustified fears or convictions that one has a serious and
often fatal illness such as heart disease, cancer or AIDS.
Patients frequently seek reassurance, check their bodies and avoid illness-related
situations.
Merely informing the patients about the lack of any diseases or the benign nature
of their symptoms only causes temporary reassurance and that is followed by
renewed worry over symptoms
Patients continue the overuse of medical services.
Should at least last 6 months and should not be of delusional intensity.
It is currently known as Illness Anxiety Disorder
52. Cognitive perspective
Previous experience
Assumptions can also lead the patient to selectively attend to information which appears to confirm the idea of having
an illness, and to selectively ignore or discount evidence indicating good health.
Thus, particular assumptions often lead to a confirmatory bias in the patient’s thinking once a critical incident has
resulted in the misinterpretation of bodily symptoms and signs as being indications of serious illness.
Situations which constitute critical incidents and activate previously dormant assumptions include unfamiliar bodily
sensations, hearing details of illness in a friend of a similar age, or new information about illness.
Further bodily sensations may then be noticed as a consequence of increased vigilance arising from anxiety. In patients
who become particularly anxious about their health, such situations are associated with thoughts which represent
personally catastrophic interpretations of the bodily sensations or signs.
53. Assumptions can also lead the patient to selectively attend to information which appears to confirm the idea of having
an illness, and to selectively ignore or discount evidence indicating good health.
Thus, particular assumptions often lead to a confirmatory bias in the patient’s thinking once a critical incident has
resulted in the misinterpretation of bodily symptoms and signs as being indications of serious illness.
Situations which constitute critical incidents and activate previously dormant assumptions include unfamiliar bodily
sensations, hearing details of illness in a friend of a similar age, or new information about illness.
Further bodily sensations may then be noticed as a consequence of increased vigilance arising from anxiety. In
patients who become particularly anxious about their health, such situations are associated with thoughts which
represent personally catastrophic interpretations of the bodily sensations or signs.
54. CATASTROPHIC INTERPRETATIONS
SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS DO NOT
INCREASE BECAUSE OF
ANXIETY
HYPOCHONDRIACAL ANXIETY
SYMPTOMS THAT OCCUR AS A PART OF
ANXIETY
PANIC ATTACK
55. Previous Experience
Formation of dysfunctional
assumption
Critical Incident- Incident or symptom
which suggest illness
Activation of Assumption
Negative automatic thought or
imagery
Hypochondriasis, Health Anxiety
BEHAVIORAL
AFFECTIVE
COGNITIVE
PHYSIOLOGICAL
56. According to a study conducted by Pennebaker found that deficient external stimulation and low levels of distraction
increase the likelihood that individuals pay attention to somatic symptoms and bodily changes.
Studies of anxiety disorders have revealed that anxious patients show an attentional bias toward threat-stimuli.
In somatoform disorders empirical evidence for this type of bias has been studied less. Nearly, all studies relate to the
role of attentional bias in hypochondriacal patients or normal subjects with high scores on the hypochondriasis scale.
Results at present are inconclusive in that normal patients show an attentional bias but others do not.
57. SOMATOSENSORYAMPLIFICATION
Hypochondriacs, may experience a broad range of somatic sensations as more intense, more noxious, more ominous,
and more disturbing than non hypochondriacs.
They may be unusually sensitive to, and intolerant of, bodily sensations in general, and be more likely to attribute
them to disease.
The hypochondriac may amplify a wide range of sensations: normal physiological functions; the benign symptoms of
trivial and self-limited ailments; the somatic concomitants of emotional arousal; as well as the symptoms of serious
disease.
He or she may thus be characterized as having an amplifying perceptual style entailing a hypervigilance or
heightened attentional focus upon bodily sensation, a tendency to select out and attend to certain relatively weak and
infrequent bodily sensations, and a propensity for responding to them with affect and cognitions which make them
more disturbing and intense.
58. Because his or her bodily sensations are so intense and so disturbing, the hypochondriac then tends to
misinterpret them and incorrectly attribute them to a serious disease rather than to a more benign cause such as
overwork, insufficient sleep, inadequate exercise, etc.
Thus, for example, a normal irregularity in the consistency of breast tissue is mistaken for a ‘lump’, or a
stomach-ache is attributed to an ulcer rather than to a recent dietary indiscretion.
Having hypothesized that he or she is sick, the hypochondriac becomes increasingly vigilant and apprehensive
This heightens somatic symptoms further, via two mechanisms.
60. Neurochemical deficits associated with illness anxiety disorder appear similar to those of mood and anxiety disorders.
A more recent article highlights the effectiveness of fluoxetine (a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and a mainstay in the
treatment of OCD), as effective in the treatment of hypochondriasis.
Encountering a patient with more than one of the anxiety spectrum disorders comorbid with illness anxiety disorder is
not unusual.
Findings of neurochemical deficits in patients with illness anxiety disorder are only preliminary, but such deficits may
explain why symptoms overlap, why the disorders are commonly comorbid, and why effective treatments for OC
spectrum disorders are also effective for illness anxiety disorder (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]).
61. ETIOLOGY AND COURSE
The onset of Hypochondriasis is frequently in early adulthood.
Although symptoms may wax and wane the course is typically chronic and the condition and it takes on a dominant
role in a person’s life and relationships.
In children somatic complaints have been shown to be influenced by attention received from parents.
Adults having hypochondriasis said parents were more caring and overprotective than parents with other psychiatric
disorders.
Hypochondriacal symptoms in children and adults are influenced
62. BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER
The preoccupation with an imagined or exaggerated body disfigurement or an
excessive concern that there is something wrong with the shape or appearance
of body parts.
This presumed abnormality is generally not noticeable to others.
Objects of concern typically include the face, head, sexual characteristics and
the general body appearance.
Cognitive features of BDD are excessive preoccupation, intrusive thoughts and
sometimes ideas of reference.
63. CONTEMPRARY THEORETICAL
PERSPECTIVE
Cognitive behavioral formulation of BDD
According to this formulation cognitive and affective features involve a perceptual disturbance in body
image, plus a preoccupation with the imagined defect especially in social situations.
Thinking maybe obsessional or delusional about the presumed abnormality in features including the
avoidance of social situations, camouflaging, checking and undertaking beauty remedies.
This model has clinical backing but it seems to lack further specification and empirical scrutiny.
64. Neuroanatomic approach
One study detected that orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex volumes of BDD
patients were significantly smaller than healthy individuals. It means that their brain has more
white substance than the control group.
Besides, there is a tendency of an increase of thalamic volume in BDD patients compared with
that in the control group.
Neuroanatomic evidence in the limbic system was also found, more specifically in the
amygdalas, between BDD, anxiety, and self-evaluating visual process.
Self-image is captured by ventral visual system, which is later interpreted by the brain’s
amygdala.
That structure is involved in emotional control in a higher level, like companionship, love,
affection, mood swings, fear, rage, and hostility. They are involved in some anxiety
manifestations too.
Interestingly, only the right amygdala volume has shown a significant correlation with BDD
symptom severity, which suggests a different lateral involvement of these brain regions
65. One study conducted by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, shows that
people with BDD may process visual information differently than people without the disorder.
Researchers showed 25 people, half with BDD and half without the disorder, three different
images of faces in high, regular, and low resolutions.
Magnetic resonance image (MRI) results showed that participants with BDD used the left side
of the brain (the analytical side) to process all three images.
The other participants used the brains’ left hemisphere for only the high-resolution images.
This could mean that the minds of people with BDD strive to acutely process visual details,
even when there is nothing to process.
This might be why they can see flaws in themselves, even when those flaws might not exist.
66. Another biological factor under consideration is that people with BDD seem to have a chemical
imbalance of the neurotransmitter serotonin, because they often respond well to the selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class of antidepressants.
Many of these are based on evidence that illustrates the effectiveness of selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of BDD.
Overall, the exact role for serotonergic transmission in the etiology of BDD remains the subject of
continuing research.
67. ASSESSMENTS
The most commonly used diagnostic interviews are the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and
the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).
Somatoform Disorders Schedule (SDS)
International Diagnostic Checklists (IDCL)
68. As an alternative approach to diagnostic interviews, Hiller et al. developed the International Diagnostic Checklists
(IDCL) which exist in separate versions for DSM-IV and ICD-10.
These checklists are recommended by the WHO for use in research and everyday patient examinations.
The basic IDCL assessment method is very similar to the above-mentioned diagnostic interviews except that the
reading of preformulated questions and a forced step-by-step procedure are not necessary.
Instead, the diagnostic criteria are listed in a clinically useful order allowing the diagnostician quickly to decide
whether or not a suspected diagnosis can be given.
The IDCL are to be administered by trained and experienced clinicians. There exists one checklist for all disorders
related to somatic symptoms and another one for hypochondriacal disorder.
69. TREATMENT OF SOMATOFORM
DISORDERS
Psychotherapy
Since physical symptoms can be related to psychological distress and a high level of health anxiety, psychotherapy — specifically,
cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) — can help improve physical symptoms.
CBT can help you:
•Examine and adapt your beliefs and expectations about health and physical symptoms
•Learn how to reduce stress
•Learn how to cope with physical symptoms
•Reduce preoccupation with symptoms
•Reduce avoidance of situations and activities due to uncomfortable physical sensations
•Improve daily functioning at home, at work, in relationships and in social situations
•Address depression and other mental health disorders
Family therapy may also be helpful by examining family relationships and improving family support and
functioning.
70. Antidepressants in somatoform and related
disorders
Several reviews indicate that medically unexplained symptoms and functional somatic syndromes respond to
psychological interventions and antidepressants.
However, fewer studies have focused on somatoform disorders and its subgroups in their own right.
The studies have examined newer antidepressants such as SSRIs and SNRIs more often than other classes of
antidepressants such as tricyclics, mirtazapine or other antidepressants.
Open label trails have reported positive outcome with nefazodone and fluvoxamine.
Significant improvement was noted in somatization disorder with nefazodone 300 mg twice a day (bd) (Menza et al.,
2001).
Although multiple measures were used to detect the outcome, the trial was short term (8 weeks) and with a small
number (15 patients). Similarly Fluvoxamine 300 mg per day was found to be effective and well tolerated in an 8 weeks
trial on 29 patients.
Editor's Notes
Concepts relating to somatization and somatoform disorders are ill-defined in research and clinical practice.
In spite of the significant comorbidity and overlapping between psychological and somatic disorders, Cartesian body-mind dualism is still used in clinical practice.
The first form includes those who experience both a mental illness and a medical one; these illnesses complicate the symptoms and management of each other.
The second form includes those who experience a psychiatric issue that is a direct result of a medical illness or its treatment; having depression due to cancer and its treatment for example.
The third form of psychosomatic illness is, 'somatoform,' disorders. Somatoform disorders are psychiatric ones that are displayed through physical issues. What this means is the physical symptoms people experience are related to psychological factors instead of a medical cause.
To some extent, most diseases are indeed psychosomatic; they involve a person's body and mind. The way a person reacts to and copes with disease varies widely from person to person. A rash of psoriasis; for example, might not bother some people too much. Yet the rash covering the same portions of the body in another person may make them feel depressed and more sick.
For example; some people with mental illnesses might not take care of themselves, eat appropriately, or take care of themselves - which can cause physical issues. The term, 'psychosomatic disorder;' however, is mainly used to mean a physical disease that is believed to be caused, or worsened, by mental factors.
Examples include eczema, psoriasis, high blood pressure, ulcers and heart disease. It is thought that the actual physical part of the person's illness might be affected by mental factors; something that is hard to prove.
Many people; however, with these and other physical diseases say their current mental state can affect how bad their physical disease is at any particular time. A chest pain; for example, might be caused by stress and no physical disease is found. It is well known that the mind can cause physical symptoms.
An important concept of focus here is ‘Alexithymia’. This concept was coined by Sifenos in 1973.
The term Alexithymia is derived from the Greek words a-lack, lexis- word and thymos- mood or emotion so it literally meant “no words for feelings”
Sifneos in his interactions with patients suffering from psychosomatic illness found that they showed a marked difficulty in communicating with the interviewer and they gave an overall impression of being dull.
These patients used actions to avoid conflicting or frustrating situations. There was a constriction in their emotional functioning but the most striking characteristic exhibited by these patients was their inability to find words to express their feelings.
A study conducted on 131 Belgian and Dutch women established strong negative correlations between Alexithymia and expression of emotions, daydreams, fantasies, planful and rational actions. (Van Heck, Grim, Vingerhoets, Bermond [1995])
The study also found out that alexithymia and problem focused coping do not go together instead patients with high alexithymia prefer passive coping like reluctantly accepting a problematic situation without any protest.
Another study undertaken by Bach& Bach ,1995 found that high Alexithymia scores can be an indicator of persistent somatization.
This went on to show that changes in the immune system may induce somatization behavior.
However, it remains unclear whether it contributes especially to the development and maintenance of somatoform symptoms in humans.
To summarize, the immunological findings, it is possible that somatization, may be associated with different biological phenomena in the immune system. However, these results have to be further confirmed.
It is evident that the somatosensory area is involved but the prefrontal cortex as well as the right parietal regions are thought to be components of disturbed neural networks that integrates processes of attention and concentration.
Haka et. al 2002; compared the Pet scans of 10 women with multiple somatoform disorders with healthy controls and found lower glucose metabolism rates in both caudate nuclei, left putamen and right precentral gyrus.
The patients showed bilateral enlargement of caudate nuclei volumes. Abnormalities of caudate has been found also in body dysmorphic disorder (Rauch et.al , 2003)
Patients with conversion symptoms show altered somatosensory evoked responses in specific forebrain areas, decreased flow to the thalamus and basal ganglia
Kellener (1986) concluded that selective perception of and attention to somatic symptoms may contribute to the acquisition of functional somatic symptoms.
Over time these processes are likely to improve a person’s skill to detect sensations that have previously remained below the threshold of perceptibility.
Barsky and Wyshak, 1990 gave the concept of somatosensory amplification. This concept has been used to describe the enhanced perceptions of non pathological bodily sensations and changes such as bodily changes accompanying anxiety and stress.
Somatization disorder has been described as a means of communication. More specifically as a somatic expression of failing to cope with one’s stress, sexual abuse, neglect, conflict and daily hassles.
This continuous presentation of somatic symptoms may become a self-handicapping strategy which means individuals mays use poor health as an excuse for poor performance.
An important factor that contributes to the maintenance of somatic symptoms is the reinforcement of the sick role.
Iatrogenic factors frequently help in the formation of somatic. For example, a physician may fail to recognize the psychological factors and prescribe unnecessary medical drugs which may help in the reinforcement of patients belief’s about illness.
Perceptual, behavioral mechanisms seem to play an important role along with the communicative function of autonomic arousal symptoms.
Morrison (1989) found a higher degree of unwanted sexual contact in women with somatization disorder when compared to women with affective disorder.
Pribor et. all; 1993 found more reports of sexual and physical abuse in female psychiatric patients with somatization disorder when compared to other diagnosis.
Ullmann and Krasner (1975) proposed a behavioral model where conversion symptoms are learned via modelling i.e observation of similar symptoms in others and are adopted by an individual for gain.
Folks et.all (1984) found CD to be more prevalent among rural residents and people belonging to low socio-economic status indicating sociocultural influences in the etiology of this condition.
Kellner (1991) summarized neurophysiological studies indicating that patients with CD generally fail to habituate to stressful stimuli and show more anxious arousal than other patients.
This assumption is based on findings that the right hemisphere is capable of generating more unpleasant emotions than the left hemisphere. (Davison, Neale, 1994)
In the late 1880s, Freud and Breuer suggested that hysterical symptoms resulted from the intrusion of "memories connected to psychical trauma" into the somatic innervation. This mind-to-body process was referred to as conversion.
The idea that conversion disorder does not have an organic basis has become entrenched.
However, some evidence supports the opposite notion. A review of imaging correlates in patients with motor and sensory conversion symptoms is referenced.
Studies on the natural history of conversion disorder indicate that many patients subsequently develop or are found to have
In fact, conversion disorders may be more frequently observed in patients with a past history of a central nervous system injury.
Fordyce formulated a behavioral theory of pain stating that maladaptive pain behavior is acquired through respondent conditioning (sensory pain) and maintained through operant conditioning. (psychological pain).
The verbal and nonverbal expressions of pain are maintained because of associated positive (financial benefits, attention, concern, sympathy) and negative reinforcers (avoidance of unpleasant situations like work/school)
Matching law –Proportion of pain behavior to healthy behavior should match the relative reinforcement for each of the two alternatives.
This is useful because it makes it possible to see how much reinforcement in necessary to sustain a particular level of given behavior.
Pain is viewed as a complex response that comprises subjective psychological, motor-behavioral and physiological components.
This account of chronic pain integrates concepts and findings from operant, respondent, observational and cognitive learning and relates them to biological concepts and physiological findings.
In other words stress and pain episodes may trigger a host of autonomic and muscular reactions particularly sympathetic activation and elevated muscle tension levels.
If such muscular tension conditions occur frequently a number of muscular and sympathetic reflexes lead to increase in muscle tension and to sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction.
If muscular contractions are of sufficient intensity , frequency and duration there will not be sufficient blood or oxygen in the affected muscles and pain-inducing substances will be released.
The ensuing pain experiences increases muscular and sympathetic hyperactivity may thus lead to a vicious circle.
As these processes also increase the sensitivity of chemo-nocireceptors the likelihood of future pain also increases.
Somatic complaints may lead to attention, sympathy and escape from undesirable situations or tasks.
As a result this can reinforce disingenuous symptom over reporting or it may reinforce hypochondriacal behavior through selective attention to somatic sensations.
If in case the somatic symptoms are ignored the hypochondriacal behavior in front of family and friends will be reduced but the individual will continue seeking medical support and focus on getting attention from the physician instead.
The above statements are all related to contingency-shaped hypochondriacal behavior but observers may also learn to exhibit through the process of modelling or rule-governed behavior
According to Kellner (1985) the hypochondriacal condition worsens as the conditioning process repeats
From a cognitive perspective, anxiety occurs because a particular situation or stimulus encountered is judged to involve an element of threat and one’s ability to effectively cope with the perceived threat is doubted (Beck, 1976).
The cognitive hypothesis of health anxiety and hypochondriasis proposes that bodily signs and symptoms are perceived as more dangerous than they really are, and that a particular illness is believed to be more probable than it really is (Salkovskis, 1989; Salkovskis & Warwick, 1986; Warwick & Salkovskis, 1989).
At the same time the patient is likely to perceive himself as unable to prevent the illness, and unable to affect its course. i.e. as having no effective means of coping with the perceived threat.
Knowledge, and past experiences, of illness (in self or others) leads to the formation of specific assumptions about symptoms, disease and health behaviors.
These are learned from a variety of sources, particularly from early experience (cf. Bianchi, 1971) but also from events in the patient’s social circle or the mass media.
Previous experience of physical ill-health in patients and in their families and previous experience of unsatisfactory medical management may be important (see Bianchi, 1971).
A further factor is the information carried by the media. A striking example is provided by the influx of cases of ‘AIDS phobia’ (Miller et al., 1985; Miller, Acton & Hedge, 1988) noted after the recent massive publicity campaign on this topic.
Examples of potentially problematic assumptions are “bodily changes are usually a sign of serious disease, because every symptom has to have an identifiable physical cause”; “if you don’t go to the doctor as soon as you notice anything unusual then it will be too late”.
Other beliefs relate to specific personal weaknesses and particular illnesses; for example, “there’s heart trouble in the family”, “I’ve had weak lungs since I was a baby”.
Such beliefs may be a constant source of anxiety and/or may be activated in vulnerable individuals by critical incidents.
Catastrophic interpretations can in turn lead to one of the two patterns of anxiety.
If the sensations or signs are not those which increase as a result of anxiety (as a consequence of autonomic arousal), or the patient does not regard the feared catastrophe as immediate, then the reaction will be hypochondriacal anxiety about health, with the cognitive, behavioural, physiological and affective correlates (e.g. “The pains in my stomach mean I have an undetected cancer”).
On the other hand, if the symptoms which are misinterpreted are those which occur as part of anxiety-induced autonomic arousal and the interpretation is that the symptoms are the signs of immediate catastrophe (e.g. “these palpitations mean that I am having a heart attack right now”), a further immediate increase in symptoms will result. If this process continues, then a panic attack is the more likely response (Clark, 1988; Salkovskis, 1988).
Despite the differences in type of symptoms and time course of feared illness, the ideation in panic and hypochondriasis is similar and the two presentations often overlap
For example, Hollander et al posited an "obsessive-compulsive spectrum" to include hypochondriasis, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), anorexia nervosa, and Tourette syndrome, all of which were believed to have similarities in responsiveness to serotonin reuptake inhibitors and to demonstrate "hyperactivity" in areas of the frontal lobes.
In a study of biological markers, subjects who met DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for hypochondriasis had decreased plasma neurotrophin 3 (NT-3) levels and platelet serotonin (5-HT) levels, compared to healthy control subjects. NT-3 is a marker of neuronal function and platelet 5-HT is a surrogate marker for serotonergic activity.
Both instruments cover all major mental disorders and include a separate section on SFDs.
Within this section, the criteria for each individual SFD diagnosis can be evaluated.
While the SCID is restricted to DSM-IV, the CIDI poly diagnostically covers DSM-IV as well as ICD-10 categories.
Another important difference is that the SCID is a strict expert rating instrument where the interviewer makes diagnostic decisions on the basis of the patients’ answers and all other available information (e.g. observations during the interview, third party information or available previous reports).
In contrast, the CIDI is administered in such a way that the patients’ answers are probed and scored without applying clinical judgement.
Therefore, the CIDI can be used by trained lay interviewers, which is an important methodological prerequisite for conducting large epidemiological studies
Somatoform Disorders Schedule (SDS) which covers all DSM-IV and ICD-10 categories of SFDs and is more differentiated than the CIDI with respect to the clinical information obtained.
The SDS was evaluated during the first phase of a WHO International Study of Somatoform Disorders and found to be a reliable tool for the assessment of SFDs in different cultures and settings.