Psychodynamic Formulation

 A Critical Tool For Managing The
        Therapeutic Alliance
Defenses
   Mature Defenses         Borderline Defenses
   Suppression             Splitting
   Sublimation             Projective
   Reaction Formation       Identification
                            Idealization
                            Devaluation
                            Projection
Defenses
   Mature Defenses         Borderline Defenses
   Suppression             Splitting
   Sublimation             Projective
   Reaction Formation       Identification
                            Idealization
                            Devaluation
                            Projection
Defenses
   Denial
   Repression
   Projection
   Undoing
   Intellectualization
   Rationalization
   Externalization
Components of the
Psychodynamic Formulation
   1. Differential Diagnosis on Axis I
   2. Differential Diagnosis on Axis II
   3. Ego Function Assessment
   4. Adult Attachment Pattern
   5.Transference Predictions
   6. Counter-transference
   7. Transference Resistance
   8. Therapeutic Strategies and Tactics
   9. Prognostic Predictions
Attachment Patterns
   Ainsworth Attachment Patterns
   1. Secure
   2.Insecure
   3. Ambivalent
   4. Disorganized
   Adult Attachment Styles
   1.Secure
   2.Preoccupied
   3.Fearful Avoidant
   4.Dismissing
Ego Function Assessment
   1. Object Relations        8. Adaptive Regression in
   2. Affect Regulation          the Service of the Ego
                                9. Reality Testing
   3. Frustration Tolerance
                                10. Sense of Reality
   4. Impulse Control          11. Stimulus Barrier
   5. Judgment                 12. Synthetic Integrative
   6 Thinking                    Functions
   7. Defenses                 13 Ego Autonomous

                                  Functions ( Hard Wired)
Transference
   Positive                  Negative
   Maternal or Paternal      Maternal or Paternal
Countertranference
   Positive                   Negative
   Maternal                   Maternal
   Paternal                   Paternal
   Emerging from ones         Emerging from ones
    own conflict                own conflicts
   Emerging from              Emerging from
    patient’s projections       patient’s projections
Transference Resistance
   Focus on extra-transferential situations
    and relationships in the here and now
   Focus on relationships in the there and
    then
Therapeutic Strategy and
Tactics
Supportive Psychotherapy
Expressive-Insight Oriented Psychotherapy
Interpersonal Psychotherapy
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Dialectical Behavioral Therapy
Pharmacotherapy
Psycho-education Patient and Family Centered
Prognosis
   Outcome is determined by a GAS score
    that seeks the highest level of
    functioning in love work and play.
    Factors complicating this goal involves
    adherence, motivation, supports, pre-
    morbid level of functioning etc. All
    factor allow for a prognostic prediction
Psychodynamic Formulation Revised

Psychodynamic Formulation Revised

  • 1.
    Psychodynamic Formulation ACritical Tool For Managing The Therapeutic Alliance
  • 2.
    Defenses  Mature Defenses  Borderline Defenses  Suppression  Splitting  Sublimation  Projective  Reaction Formation Identification  Idealization  Devaluation  Projection
  • 3.
    Defenses  Mature Defenses  Borderline Defenses  Suppression  Splitting  Sublimation  Projective  Reaction Formation Identification  Idealization  Devaluation  Projection
  • 4.
    Defenses  Denial  Repression  Projection  Undoing  Intellectualization  Rationalization  Externalization
  • 5.
    Components of the PsychodynamicFormulation  1. Differential Diagnosis on Axis I  2. Differential Diagnosis on Axis II  3. Ego Function Assessment  4. Adult Attachment Pattern  5.Transference Predictions  6. Counter-transference  7. Transference Resistance  8. Therapeutic Strategies and Tactics  9. Prognostic Predictions
  • 7.
    Attachment Patterns  Ainsworth Attachment Patterns  1. Secure  2.Insecure  3. Ambivalent  4. Disorganized  Adult Attachment Styles  1.Secure  2.Preoccupied  3.Fearful Avoidant  4.Dismissing
  • 8.
    Ego Function Assessment  1. Object Relations 8. Adaptive Regression in  2. Affect Regulation the Service of the Ego  9. Reality Testing  3. Frustration Tolerance  10. Sense of Reality  4. Impulse Control  11. Stimulus Barrier  5. Judgment  12. Synthetic Integrative  6 Thinking Functions  7. Defenses  13 Ego Autonomous Functions ( Hard Wired)
  • 9.
    Transference  Positive  Negative  Maternal or Paternal  Maternal or Paternal
  • 10.
    Countertranference  Positive  Negative  Maternal  Maternal  Paternal  Paternal  Emerging from ones  Emerging from ones own conflict own conflicts  Emerging from  Emerging from patient’s projections patient’s projections
  • 11.
    Transference Resistance  Focus on extra-transferential situations and relationships in the here and now  Focus on relationships in the there and then
  • 12.
    Therapeutic Strategy and Tactics SupportivePsychotherapy Expressive-Insight Oriented Psychotherapy Interpersonal Psychotherapy Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavioral Therapy Pharmacotherapy Psycho-education Patient and Family Centered
  • 13.
    Prognosis  Outcome is determined by a GAS score that seeks the highest level of functioning in love work and play. Factors complicating this goal involves adherence, motivation, supports, pre- morbid level of functioning etc. All factor allow for a prognostic prediction

Editor's Notes

  • #2 The data collection required to synthesize a dynamic formulation is derived from a comprehensive psychiatric history with emphasis on development. Reconstruction of the factors influencing the initial or primary attachment will be critical in understanding the pre-morbid personality organization and ego functions.
  • #6 This template is to the clinician managing a therapeutic alliance as the instrument panel is to a pilot flying an aircraft. The formulation allows for a structured therapeutic frame and goal with tactical interventions to navigate the vicissitudes of change as doctor and patient negotiate the mercurial currents of the mind.
  • #8 Ainsworth researched Bowlby’s concept of attachment and developed a research paradigm utilizing the stranger situation in a controlled setting with mother and toddler. Her research suggested four patterns of reaction to separation from the primary care taker. Researchers have extended this work and now conceptualize four adult attachment patterns that emerge from the synergy of anxiety and defensive avoidance over a spectrum from no aniety to extreme anxiety and no avoidance to extreme avoidance.