CASE FORMULATION1: BRON 
I CASE HISTORY 
Bron is a 39-year-old woman, professionally qualified as a specialised nurse. She is 
married and has two children, 2 and 7 years of age. She has had several periods of 
depression dating back to her later teens. 
Her present depression began about six months ago when she attempted to return to work 
after taking maternity leave for her second child. Additionally, her father-in-law had a 
serious illness and came to live with the family. Her symptoms included: 
· depressed mood, crying, anxiety and worry, 
· lack of feeling of pleasure, 
· a pervasive sense of worthlessness, 
· poor sleep, 
· fatigue, 
· poor concentration. 
Her BDI score was 33. She scored 2 on the hopelessness question (Q2) and 1 on the 
suicidal ideas question (Q9). She reported occasional suicidal thoughts but did not think 
she would carry them out and had no plan for doing so. 
Previous treatment was by anti-depressant medication, with one abortive attempt at 
counselling. Her response to anti-depressives tended to be quite slow, although successful 
in the end. At this time, her response to medication had been minimal and her doctor 
switched medication and encouraged her to take up CBT via her occupational health 
scheme. 
Bron did not have any health problems likely to influence her psychological problems. 
1 This format for formulation adapts the guidelines of the Academy of Cognitive 
Therapy. See material for professionals at www.academdyofcognitivetherapy.
Likely diagnosis: Major depressive episode, recurrent, severe. 
II: CASE FORMULATION 
A. Precipitants: Although Bron described her husband as a good man whom she 
loved she did not think that he offered her enough support, especially with the 
youngest child and with looking after his father. When she tried to return to work, 
she became preoccupied with the risk of making mistakes with patients and of 
being charged with malpractice. She felt that this played into an incipient lack of 
self-esteem. She was ‘struggling’ with looking after the children, trying to work 
and dealing with her worries. She thought that if she could have some time off 
work, she could ‘steady the ship’ and get back later. Having her father-in-law was 
the tipping point when she realised that even this plan was doomed. She felt that 
she could not refuse to look after such a ‘poor old man who was so ill’. At this 
point her lack of self-esteem was combined with her ‘superwoman’ style of 
coping and this combination led to depletion and near collapse. 
B. Cross-sectional view of cognitions and behaviours: Bron’s days were very 
similar, consisting of a cycle of getting the children to school and nursery, nursing 
her father-in-law and attending to household chores. During brief times on her 
own, she would become preoccupied both with a sense of failure (about not 
returning to work) and resentment (of having to look after everyone else in the 
family). Neither she nor her husband seemed to have time for each other and they 
had not had sex for many months. Bron had some good friends and seeing them 
was one of the few pleasurable points in her week. 
C. Longitudinal view of cognitions and behaviours: Bron’s mother had died when 
Bron was a teenager. When her mother became ill, Bron moved in with an aunt 
and rarely saw her mother. She was shielded from going to the funeral. Her aunt 
was a caring if rather severely religious person. Bron’s father kept clear of her and 
remarried quite quickly – never resuming anything other than very minimal 
contact with Bron. Bron thinks that her aunt probably resented having to look
after her and Bron developed the belief that she was ‘burden’ to others and was 
not really worthy or loveable. During her early adulthood, Bron developed the 
idea that she might prove her worth by selfless service, as a wife and mother or 
nurse, or both – ‘If people need me then this makes me worth something.’ Her 
husband was quite a moody and needy person. Their relationship was based on 
recognising how each other felt and responding to needs. Problems arose, 
however, when they both felt needy at the same time. The husband was himself in 
a downturn – most likely because his own career seemed stuck at this time. 
D. Strengths and assets: Bron was actually a superb nurse and a more than ‘good 
enough’ mother. She was intelligent and sensitive and inspired fiercely loyal 
friendship from her peers. When she cared to show it, she had an engaging ironic 
sense of humour. 
E. Working hypothesis: The core of Bron’s problems lay in her chronic lack of 
self-esteem resulting from the circumstances of her mother’s death and its 
aftermath. She solved her lack of self-confidence by working very hard and 
dedicating herself to looking after the needs of others, often neglecting her own 
needs. This pattern, twinned with a lack of appropriately assertive behaviours, 
lend to periods of depletion, collapse and depression. In this instance, the pattern 
was exacerbated by the unusual circumstances of having to look after her father-in- 
law and of her ‘failure’ to return to work after her second child. 
III TREATMENT PLAN 
A. Problem list: 
1 Lack of pleasurable activities in the week. 
2 Depression and negative thinking about the self. 
3 Lack of appropriately assertive behaviours. 
4 Over-commitment to the needs of others. 
5 Lack of a ‘lower gear’ in her working style. 
B. Treatment goals:
1 Learn to consciously plan the week to include a balance of work and 
pleasure. 
2 Learn to think about the self in a more balanced way. 
3 Learn appropriately assertive behaviour. 
4 Learn to negotiate meeting others’ needs more on her own terms. 
5 Learn to vary work behaviour according to energy levels and other 
commitments. 
C. Plan for treatment 
Given the prominence of the marital relationship in connection with certain goals 
(especially goals 3 and 4), it is necessary to think about which elements of this 
work may be done in the context of individual work and which in relation to 
couples work. The client’s and her husband’s view of this will determine what 
actually happens but a viable sequence would be that: 
· Treatment will begin with cognitive therapy of depression in relation to 
goals 1 and 2. 
· If this is successful, then it may be appropriate to consider cognitive 
therapy couples work in relation to goals 3 and 4. 
· The client may then be ready to tackle a return to work in conjunction with 
working on goal 5 as either on-going CBT or as an element of follow-up 
maintenance therapy.

1 case formulation bron

  • 1.
    CASE FORMULATION1: BRON I CASE HISTORY Bron is a 39-year-old woman, professionally qualified as a specialised nurse. She is married and has two children, 2 and 7 years of age. She has had several periods of depression dating back to her later teens. Her present depression began about six months ago when she attempted to return to work after taking maternity leave for her second child. Additionally, her father-in-law had a serious illness and came to live with the family. Her symptoms included: · depressed mood, crying, anxiety and worry, · lack of feeling of pleasure, · a pervasive sense of worthlessness, · poor sleep, · fatigue, · poor concentration. Her BDI score was 33. She scored 2 on the hopelessness question (Q2) and 1 on the suicidal ideas question (Q9). She reported occasional suicidal thoughts but did not think she would carry them out and had no plan for doing so. Previous treatment was by anti-depressant medication, with one abortive attempt at counselling. Her response to anti-depressives tended to be quite slow, although successful in the end. At this time, her response to medication had been minimal and her doctor switched medication and encouraged her to take up CBT via her occupational health scheme. Bron did not have any health problems likely to influence her psychological problems. 1 This format for formulation adapts the guidelines of the Academy of Cognitive Therapy. See material for professionals at www.academdyofcognitivetherapy.
  • 2.
    Likely diagnosis: Majordepressive episode, recurrent, severe. II: CASE FORMULATION A. Precipitants: Although Bron described her husband as a good man whom she loved she did not think that he offered her enough support, especially with the youngest child and with looking after his father. When she tried to return to work, she became preoccupied with the risk of making mistakes with patients and of being charged with malpractice. She felt that this played into an incipient lack of self-esteem. She was ‘struggling’ with looking after the children, trying to work and dealing with her worries. She thought that if she could have some time off work, she could ‘steady the ship’ and get back later. Having her father-in-law was the tipping point when she realised that even this plan was doomed. She felt that she could not refuse to look after such a ‘poor old man who was so ill’. At this point her lack of self-esteem was combined with her ‘superwoman’ style of coping and this combination led to depletion and near collapse. B. Cross-sectional view of cognitions and behaviours: Bron’s days were very similar, consisting of a cycle of getting the children to school and nursery, nursing her father-in-law and attending to household chores. During brief times on her own, she would become preoccupied both with a sense of failure (about not returning to work) and resentment (of having to look after everyone else in the family). Neither she nor her husband seemed to have time for each other and they had not had sex for many months. Bron had some good friends and seeing them was one of the few pleasurable points in her week. C. Longitudinal view of cognitions and behaviours: Bron’s mother had died when Bron was a teenager. When her mother became ill, Bron moved in with an aunt and rarely saw her mother. She was shielded from going to the funeral. Her aunt was a caring if rather severely religious person. Bron’s father kept clear of her and remarried quite quickly – never resuming anything other than very minimal contact with Bron. Bron thinks that her aunt probably resented having to look
  • 3.
    after her andBron developed the belief that she was ‘burden’ to others and was not really worthy or loveable. During her early adulthood, Bron developed the idea that she might prove her worth by selfless service, as a wife and mother or nurse, or both – ‘If people need me then this makes me worth something.’ Her husband was quite a moody and needy person. Their relationship was based on recognising how each other felt and responding to needs. Problems arose, however, when they both felt needy at the same time. The husband was himself in a downturn – most likely because his own career seemed stuck at this time. D. Strengths and assets: Bron was actually a superb nurse and a more than ‘good enough’ mother. She was intelligent and sensitive and inspired fiercely loyal friendship from her peers. When she cared to show it, she had an engaging ironic sense of humour. E. Working hypothesis: The core of Bron’s problems lay in her chronic lack of self-esteem resulting from the circumstances of her mother’s death and its aftermath. She solved her lack of self-confidence by working very hard and dedicating herself to looking after the needs of others, often neglecting her own needs. This pattern, twinned with a lack of appropriately assertive behaviours, lend to periods of depletion, collapse and depression. In this instance, the pattern was exacerbated by the unusual circumstances of having to look after her father-in- law and of her ‘failure’ to return to work after her second child. III TREATMENT PLAN A. Problem list: 1 Lack of pleasurable activities in the week. 2 Depression and negative thinking about the self. 3 Lack of appropriately assertive behaviours. 4 Over-commitment to the needs of others. 5 Lack of a ‘lower gear’ in her working style. B. Treatment goals:
  • 4.
    1 Learn toconsciously plan the week to include a balance of work and pleasure. 2 Learn to think about the self in a more balanced way. 3 Learn appropriately assertive behaviour. 4 Learn to negotiate meeting others’ needs more on her own terms. 5 Learn to vary work behaviour according to energy levels and other commitments. C. Plan for treatment Given the prominence of the marital relationship in connection with certain goals (especially goals 3 and 4), it is necessary to think about which elements of this work may be done in the context of individual work and which in relation to couples work. The client’s and her husband’s view of this will determine what actually happens but a viable sequence would be that: · Treatment will begin with cognitive therapy of depression in relation to goals 1 and 2. · If this is successful, then it may be appropriate to consider cognitive therapy couples work in relation to goals 3 and 4. · The client may then be ready to tackle a return to work in conjunction with working on goal 5 as either on-going CBT or as an element of follow-up maintenance therapy.