Privacy Undertood

Privacy Undertood
"Privacy Understood or Ignored" Privacy has become a prominent topic in academic and social
debates. People are gradually sharing more and more personal information as their dependence on
the Internet and online services. After all, privacy is the state or condition of being free from being
observed or disturbed by other people. In combination, these qualities may lead to a safer and
prosperous standard of living. The same notion can be applied to social media particularly
Facebook. In general, the understanding of privacy is different in every age group, from teenagers
(13–17), young adults (18–24), and adults (25 and older) each feel differently about the outcome of
posting personal information online. Teenagers are sharing more personal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The idea that privacy has been pushed aside by adolescents is remarkable. It is the responsibility of
every individual to be well informed and not trust cooperation's privacy policy to protect them. Even
if privacy is of less concern to individuals during their adolescence, their enthusiastic sharing of
online information will leave their privacy vulnerable in the current online environment. A possible
step that could be taken would be to offer adolescents, like teenagers, the opportunity for additional
protection online concerning their personal information. However, whether they choose to use these
forms of protection by all ages well depend on the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay On Privacy Vs American Privacy
America vs. Europe: Liberty v. Dignity
Privacy is valued as a most important sphere of personal life by all human beings. They value some
control over information of their life and who knows what about them. No one wants their personal
information to be accessed by anyone at any time. But nowadays due to the advancements in
information technology people's privacy is threatened. Talking about the concept of privacy, there is
always broad distinction between American and European society. In the context of system of
privacy, American versus European is just like liberty versus dignity. American enjoys right to
freedom whereas European prefers right to respect and personal dignity. They prefer rights to ones
image, name and reputation rather than freedom.
Running a business in this dynamic competitive world is not an easy task to do but if I was CEO or
owner of any company, I would have preferred the European system of privacy rather than the
American system and it is because, though Americans have right to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They never want to lose their information and disclose their personal data in front of the public. The
leakage of any data or document of my organization will cost me the unbearable loss and I won't
take any chance. Nevertheless, I won't even want the wrong information leakage about my
organization in the market and news. No matter what, I would always prefer to secure the privacy of
my company and let the people know only what I want them to know. Not only this, but the
European system of privacy also let me have control over what and how much I want to reveal my
information. With the use of this system any organization, institution and government authority can
use the information collected about my company only for the purpose for which it was collected,
and can be processed only with my consent and when it is actually required by

A Brief Note On Privacy And The Privacy
Jennifer Danh
English 2010
Dr. Panko
4 Dec. 2014
A Right to Privacy Technology has proposed a variety of different options to support the privacy
rights of people. At the same time, technology has also done the opposite, making it almost
impossible for anyone to have secured privacy. Nowadays, there are multiple hacking programs or
devices that can help protect private information; however, they can also be used to invade privacy.
Modern–day society has records of incidents and events involving the invasion of privacy, including
those not only in private homes, but as well as national and international levels. Is it possible to
sustain our privacy to levels that are deemed safe when you are on your cellphone, computer, or
even in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the article, "Shopping for Privacy on the Internet," James P. Nehf states that "... [Our] consumer
privacy in the United States is largely the responsibility of individuals who are expected to guard
their personal information and take steps to minimize the risk that it will be used in an unauthorized
way" (Nehf, 351). Fortunately, there are multiple routes you can take to help protect and preserve
your personal information, such as doing something as simple as changing passwords and double
checking all the links we click or be cautious of websites we encounter that has strange behavior.
However, technology also has a small catch: putting your private information at risk for invasion.
Just when you believe our personal materials are guaranteed safety, the same content can be hacked
or tapped into by a person or group of individuals with the knowledge of how to work a computer,
they can use this skill for negative intentions. Knowing that technology is constantly changing, we
must understand just how much our personal information is at threat. In many cases it seems as if
you need to be a step ahead of the criminal. In order to determine the best course of action, we must
think like one to increase our confidential information. This is another route to take to deepen our
understanding of the elements within privacy. In 1997, the U.S government passed the consumer
Internet Privacy Protection Act. (Nehf) This bill provided the consumer the right to all information
that an

Technology And Privacy
The internet provides us with a vast amount of information right at our finger tips but manages to
not display the negative effects that it has. The internet can be utilized in ways that assist our
everyday lives as well as making simple tasks even easier. How has technology altered our daily
lives? Individually there is an excessive reliance on technology to function daily, but has this
adjustment been beneficial or are we positioning too much reliance on the Internet? Nevertheless, it
is essential that we are cautious with how frequently our dependence is on the internet considering it
is not as secure as it may appear. The value of our privacy requires a tradeoff that we must continue
if the desired utilization our technology will continue.
As daily internet users, we surf the Internet thinking that the websites and security ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
As humans, we detect that we are unable to function without the use of our technology. Does this
excessive usability of technology affect how we analyze and operate daily? Nora Volkow, the
director of National on Drug Abuse, states "The technology is rewiring our brains" (Ritchel 2).
Individuals have demonstrated how this has become a valid statement in society today. In Ritchel's
article "Attached to Technology and Paying the Price" Mr. Campbell, an active technology user on
and off the job, suffers from being incapable of detaching himself from his technology. Mr.
Campbell falls asleep every night with his cell phone on his chest and initially rises in the morning
to flee to the Internet. His lack of disengaging himself with his technology not only affects himself,
but his family as well. His wife states that "I would love for him to unplug, to be totally engaged"
(Ritchel 3). As shown in the lifestyle of Mr. Campbell and his family, technology has not only
dominated his life but his families as

Privacy Law
1. What is the difference between privacy law and information systems security? How are they
related?
Privacy law stipulates what is public and what is private data. IS Security is required to comply with
the laws, which is how they are related.
2. Was the employee justified in taking home official data? Why or why not?
Uncertain. The employee had taken the work home for 3 years, and being as this is very likely to
have gone unnoticed for this period of time, although unauthorized, it was apparently considered
normal at that particular office.
3. What are the possible consequences associated with the data loss?
At worst, identity theft on an unprecedented level, with 26.5 million records of PII of Veterans and
Active Duty personnel. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
11. What information system security and privacy security policies do you think would help mitigate
this breach and loss of privacy data?
Obviously, requiring all assets containing PII or PHI to be secured at the VA, with removal of those
assets being a violation of employment and cause for termination.
Modification of their Acceptable User Policy to reflect these requirements.
Conducting training for all personnel that have access to sensitive information.
12. What or whom was the weakest link in this chain of security and protection of privacy data?
Administration. With proper policies and requirements in place this incident would likely not have
happened.
13. If the VA had performed a security and information assurance audit for compliance, what can the
VA do on an annual basis to help mitigate this type of loose policy conformance?
By identifying deficiencies in policies or practices they can address the issues directly and ensure
that all policies are sufficient for information security compliance. Also, personnel with access to
sensitive information must be made aware of the consequences of non–compliance, ensuring that
accountability is in

Privacy In America
Americans privacy is a very controversial topic in today's society. Many individuals believe that
they cannot share information about themselves. However, all Americans should be willing to share
everything about themselves. Sharing all information about he or she may help another person. Also,
sharing all information can make you a better person. In addition, sharing all personal information
shows that persons true personality. One reason Americans should be willing to share everything
about themselves is hiding information does not show that persons true personality. A major part of
individuals personality is their past experiences and thoughts on those experiences. For instance,
"Personal information, be it biographical, biological, genealogical, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In particular, "Facebook is the leading social media site that promotes information sharing, and part
of the company's mission is to "make the world more open." In his book The Facebook Effect,
David Kirkpatrick explains that Facebook finder's believe that "more visibility makes us better
people. Some claim, for example, that because of Facebook, young people today have a harder time
cheating on their boyfriends or girlfriends"" (Tapscott 117) Sharing information is helping the
younger generation learn valuable life lessons. With many young Americans on Facebook it reveals
who you are in a relationship with. If one individual sees that another has a relationship with
someone else, most likely they will not try to start a new relationship with that same person and
wreck the previous one. Additionally, revealing all information helps society as well. For example,
"When we reveal personal information we can help society too. Every time a gay person comes out
or someone with depression opens up about his condition, it helps break down the stigma and
prejudice. Fully 20 percent of all patients with the fatal disease ALS share intimate information
about their treatment and condition on the network PatientsLikeMe.com. And tens of thousands of
others with rare diseases who use that website report that sharing has helped them manage their
illness." (Tapscott

Snowden And Privacy
EDWARD SNOWDEN EXPLAINS HOW TO RECLAIM YOUR PRIVACY Snowden is a firm
believer in the importance of privacy, surveillance reform, and encryption. In interviews with Micah
Lee, he talks about the importance of these features, but rarely went into details about them.
Snowden believes we should encrypt are phones, encrypt are hard drives, use a password manager,
and use two factor authentication. This will help give us a level of privacy. Snowden says in the
interview that Tor is the most important privacy enhancing technology used today. Operational
security is to think about vulnerability. Operational security prevents people from knowing sensitive
information about us. Snowden believes we should all use ad blockers to protect are privacy since

Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy Information we collect How we use information we collect Transparency and choice
Information you share Accessing and updating your personal information Information we share
Information security When this Privacy Policy applies Compliance and cooperation with regulatory
authorities Changes Specific product practices Other useful privacy and security related materials
Self Regulatory Frameworks Key terms Partners Updates
Welcome to the Google Privacy Policy
When you use Google services, you trust us with your information. This Privacy Policy is meant to
help you understand what data we collect, why we collect ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
We also use these technologies to collect and store information when you interact with services we
offer to our partners, such as advertising services or Google features that may appear on other sites.
Our Google Analytics product helps businesses and site owners analyze the traffic to their websites
and apps. When used in conjunction with our advertising services, such as those using the
DoubleClick cookie, Google Analytics information is linked, by the Google Analytics customer or
by Google, using Google technology, with information about visits to multiple sites.
Information we collect when you are signed in to Google, in addition to information we obtain about
you from partners, may be associated with your Google Account. When information is associated
with your Google Account, we treat it as personal information. For more information about how you
can access, manage or delete information that is associated with your Google Account, visit the
Transparency and choice section of this policy.
Back to

Wiretapping And Privacy
What does it feel like using a mobile device everyday of your life knowing that there is someone on
the other side of the screen monitoring your actions? NSA (National Security Agency) surveillance
is a controversial topic in the United States today. Some may say that government surveillance is
used for our safety, but others argue that it violates our rights. Wiretapping has been an issue with
the NSA, where conversations through phones or other source of electronic communication can
secretly be monitored. According to John Gibson's article from Fox News, "NSA Wiretapping
Program Not Strictly Legal but Strictly Necessary," he states how without wiretapping, terrorist
activities can and will become a threat because terrorist will be able to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This bias is most relevant in the Gibson's article. His article is more opinionated and he does bring
in outside sources to say that NSA surveillance is necessary. He does not touch on the liberal side of
his arguments and proceeds with his statements that we need NSA surveillance. He uses his
examples of two Arabs being arrested due to terrorist activities and they were not monitored by
wiretapping. In Watkins's article there is not so much bias by placement because she recognizes the
problems with NSA surveillance and refers to both sides. She acknowledges the different sections of
the Patriot Act that affect both sides. There is bias placement because the more information and
outside sources given in the article, we will tend to believe it is valid without seeing the other side of
the

Invasion Of Privacy
Privacy Paper I believe that everyone should have their privacy to a certain degree, no matter what
they are using, whether it is their phone, smart TV, or any other electronic device. Some of the
things that they look up are for their own use and their use only. The reasons into why I believe
privacy should be invaded would be during an official investigation, something along the lines of
fraud, murder or a terrorist attack. I believe this should only be done by the person or people
investigating the crime. These people would be people from the FBI, CIA or the police. This is the
only time that I feel privacy should be invaded so that the police can find the person or people
responsible. As for Google and Facebook and other such places

Privacy Cost Of Privacy
In our technology growing world, we are confronted with exposing our privacy every second of the
day. From as easy as taking pictures from an iPhone to downloading a game on the App Store,
personal information, no matter how well one tries to hide, the material can be released for dozens
to see. Honan writes, "iPhone shots can be automatically placed on a map... Clicking on them
revealed photos of an apartment interior... Now I know where she lives" (3). When taking a picture,
thinking of whether other people will see it somewhere else usually does not enter our brain. If the
picture is not shared on any website then the picture should be safe, right? Wrong. From reading
through Honan's essay, he encounters several ways that our privacy is no longer private. Finding fun
and entertaining new apps keeps us interested in our technology and also keeps the app creators
linked to our personal information. It is surprising that some of the most popular apps that have
nothing to do with our personal information is somehow getting a hold of our info. For example,
Pandora has been a popular app for several years now, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When this app first came out, almost every person had this game and to this day, many people still
have this game on their phones or computers. Ball states "The data pouring onto communication
networks from the new generation of iPhone and Android apps ranges from phone model and screen
size to personal details such as age, gender and location" (2). Angry Birds has nothing to do with
sharing this kind of information while playing the game and there is no possible way a person can
tell the sex of the player unless they hack other information. Phone apps are not the only problem,
though. Even if one does not own a phone or a computer, their information is still out there. They
could be completely singled out from the world and somehow people can find their info of where
they live, what age they are, etc. (Ball

Privacy In Australia
Privacy uses the theory of natural rights, in relation to new information and communication
technologies. It is an essential human right that retrains both government and private party action
that threatens the privacy of individuals. Although there is no publicity or personal rights in
Australia – no rights to privacy that protects a person's image – there have been many rules
introduced when taking or uploading photographs or film.
Photography or film can be classed as a criminal offence, especially if it construed as child
pornography – a form of sexual exploitation of a "child" whom is 17 and younger. The recording or
photographing of schoolyard fights is also considered an illegal offence, especially when it is posted
to social media.

The Evolution Of Privacy
Privacy is a concept idea that could be understood on a certain level. However, according to "The
Evolution (Or Devolution) of Privacy by Debbie V.S Kasper, the definition of the word itself
changes dramatically base on variety of social institution and the situation that that the term is
referring to. There are countless ways to interpret the meaning of privacy, but unfortunately, due to
the broad nature of the conceptual structure of the idea, none of the statement has proven to be
adequate to use as an official definition. Because of this reason, I strongly believe that privacy in
today's society does not exist anymore. Many studies have suggested that technological
advancement is the main factor that leads to the dissolution of privacy, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Surveillances and interceptions for the purpose of security has been a huge debate for many decades
in regards to whether or not it causes harm to privacy. In this day and age, public surveillance can be
found almost everywhere from street corner all the way to atm machine. According to the statistic
provide by CCS international, an average person in New York City could be spotted on camera at an
alarming rate of 73–75 times a day (Murphy, 2002). In addition to this, communication interception
such as wiring, telephone, mobile phone or even email is consider as privacy invasion, and it has
been carry out mainly by the government agency (NSA) and corporations discretely. The problem to
this issue is that although people know that they "could" be watched, they have no idea for what
purpose will the record be use for. Many people strongly believe that they should be free to do
whatever they want, and although security camera is necessary in certain places, it is not necessary
everywhere. Being in constant surveillance is similar to being in confinement, and that people are
losing their freedom of being in private due to these

Privacy In Citizenfour
I am more willing to risk imprisonment [...] than I am to risk the curtailment of my intellectual
freedom and that of those around me. (Edward Snowden)
True privacy in our modern age is nearly impossible. Although we have freedom of mobility (to
travel nearly anywhere in the world), we are constantly watched. In Laura Poitras's 2014
documentary Citizenfour, which takes place in 2013 when whistleblower and former infrastructure
analyst for the NSA (National Security Agency), Edward Snowden released information that
revealed the mass state surveillance of American citizens by the NSA after the September 11
terrorist attacks (or 9/11) as a method to detect terrorists. During an interview with American
journalist Glenn Greenwald, Snowden states that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Originally an architectural model for a prison (Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon), American
philosopher Michel Foucault applies the panopticon's characteristics – which include: the lack of
privacy; the forced conformity and changes in behaviour to cope with the lack of privacy; and lack
of knowledge of who is watching you, why they are watching you, how, or whether you are being
watched or not– to our modern world (Simon 2–3). Bart Simon argues, "To know one is being seen
without being able to see carries with it uncertainty that becomes a source of anxiety, discomfort and
terror" (Simon 4). In other words, feeling that you are being watched causes stress, which ultimately
leads to "normalization" and "conformity" – changing our behaviour (which mimics the behaviour
of those around us) to adapt (Simon 4–5, 7; Langlois). Furthermore, in the panoptic prison of our
everyday world, we are inmates who try to adapt to the slow deterioration of our right to privacy.
Citizenfour, presents the concepts of privacy and surveillance following the September 11 Terrorist
Attacks, along with the behavioural effects of knowing one is relentlessly being watched by the
state. Through the behaviour of Edward Snowden and the director's use of symbolism, Citizenfour
reveals the panoptic prison present in our modern

Is Privacy Overrated By David Schinke's Personal Privacy?
Private privacy is personal information that people keep secret from public; it also means to refrain
people from knowing about them or their situations. Many companies and businesses wants to
protect people from hackers and thieves from using their information, such as Social Security and
credit card barcodes; consequently, hackers use people's information to buy illegal products or to
expose explicit information from their social media pages to the public. Other suggested that
personal privacy does not exist when the government is watching people, stopping terrorists and
criminals from plotting attacks against their communities. David Plotz, a writer and deputy editor of
Slate, wrote an essay entitled "Privacy is Overrated" to talk about ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They both encourage people to talk about this matter in order to gain the insight from these essays.
However, the question is about which paper made a convincing argument about personal privacy.
The essay who made a convincing argument is the one that understands people's struggle about
personal privacy; he designs his essay with real–life scenarios to exemplify the meaning of personal
privacy. Then, he uses these scenarios to speak his message. Finally, he leaves the readers with a
breathtaking conclusion to relieve their anxieties. David Plotz used his own life to persuade the
audience that personal privacy is an individual problem where no one cares for one another. In
contrast, David Schinke used two different scenarios and people's quotes in order convince that too
much dependency on social media will cause people to invade their own privacy; in other words,
people put themselves at risk if they expose what they did or who they are online. Based on the
information given from the essays and the stylish appeals they used to share the message, David
Plotz's essay makes a better convincing argument about personal privacy; his message may have
stern criticism about people's remarks on personal privacy, but he concludes a moral message to help
people to think about others rather than to live as

A Brief Note On Hipaa Privacy And The Privacy
Ethel Carew
HIPAA Privacy Assignment– 1/20/15
How would the HIPPA Privacy policy be structured?
As the Compliance Officer, I would choose the single 'all or nothing' approach when structuring a
policy for applying the Privacy Rules. Though most cases are complex and are not as 'cut and dry' in
the application of the privacy rules, at the end of the day, the single approach ensures simplicity and
uniformity. The institution's privacy notice will inform patients that the hospital may talk to family
members and other individuals involved in their care and that minimal information about them
included in the hospital's directory can be provided to individuals that ask for the patient by name.
The patient will however be giving the option to opt out of this. If they opt out, no information will
be disclosed, if they do not then the hospital will use its discretion and professional judgment in
making a decision that in the best interest of the patient as to who to disclose to. Hospital staff will
be train on how to obtain use judgment on how to informally obtain information based on
circumstances about a patient preference for disclosure of their PHI.
Case #1
From whom would you likely receive requests for information about these children and their
condition?
On a single approach privacy. I would prioritize as to who and what PHI will be disclose based on a
need to know basis. In this case, I would expect the following individuals to reach out to the hospital
for information

The Privacy Of The Hipaa Privacy Laws
The Right to Keep It Hidden
Everyone hides behind a mask of what they want others to know, but when that mask is removed,
the private information nobody wants leaked spills out. Until 2003, there was no mask protecting the
confidentiality of peoples' most private information, their private medical history. Before this time,
patients had no right to protect their medical information, and no control over who could access it.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule locked away the once open book of patients' medical information in a safe
solely controlled by the patient. This federal law, created by the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, became the "first federal healthcare information privacy law", and addresses
patients' rights pertaining to their medical information (Solove 5). In order for patients to continue to
have medical privacy and control over their medical records, the HIPAA Privacy Rule needs to
remain a strongly enforced federal law.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule allows patients to be the dominant controller of their personal medical
information by giving them the choice to limit the accessibility of their medical record to others, and
the opportunity to obtain their medical record at any time (Solove 1). By giving the patient access to
his or her personal medical record, he or she is able to become aware of what information is inside.
This gives the patient the opportunity to address a mistake in the medical information with his or her
doctor. If the doctor disagrees with the

Privacy In Australia
The essence of this contention is that presently, privacy is not considered a legal tort and journalists
and journalism practice are currently exempt from the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). This is the case
provided "the practice is engaged in by the organisation...(and) deal with privacy in the context of
the activities of a media organisation" (The Privacy Act (Cth) s7B(4)). The basis of the concept of
privacy leads to speculation over whether current laws must be tightened to secure the privacy of
Australian individuals. However, this in turn may be seen to compromise the basic principles of
journalism. It has the potential to restrict the journalists' freedom and prevent them from gaining
information by means that they have previously. If the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is clearly explicated in the Australia Journalists' Association Code of Ethics. Journalists are
expected to commit to respecting privacy of the individual under this code (Chadwick, p. 1, 2003). It
is contended by Paul Chadwick, former Victorian Privacy Commissioner that there is compatibility
between the notions of journalism and privacy due to the fact that even the journalists see
themselves as having the ability to complete their work whilst respecting privacy of the individual
through the clear adoption of this notion of privacy in their own code of ethics (Chadwick, p.1,
2003). Further, the Australian Press Council which governs the print media and the Australian
Communications and Media Authority – the agency which oversees all media entities in the country
also have their own codes of ethics to which Australian journalists must adhere. These measures
seek to ensure that privacy of the individual is respected and that journalists do not act in such a way
which is contrary to these codes with respect to privacy. The notion of privacy can however be
waived if the story is considered to be in the public interest. Keating (2010) defined this somewhat
amorphous notion of 'public interest' as "what is in the interest of the public as a

Privacy Rights And The Privacy
How different countries and organizations are approaching privacy issues along with my predictions
how it will unfold the future
There is a concern about many users privacy worldwide. Technology is constantly upgrading and
internet is being used daily worldwide. Laws are constantly changing and there are many concerns
about this. In this essay, I will be talking about why
Companies are collecting data, laws regarding privacy policies and I will give prediction on how
privacy issues will unfold in the future.
What can be done Today
Technology is constantly upgrading everyday and it creates unique challenges for individuals
privacy rights while there are regulators looking to preserve both privacy rights and technological
innovation. For awhile now society has been struggling on how to balance privacy rights and
emerging technologies. For example, early as 1890, Newspapers and Photographs were on the rise
and legal scholars called for added privacy protections, including enshrining those rights in criminal
law. As people have a right to protect their privacy, it is still a struggle while promoting innovation
in this fast increasing technology world we live in today.
Today, we can send information all over the world instantly; however movement and activities can
be tracked through computers and cell phones. With new and improved technology, it can improve
lives, increase public safety, build wealth and promote efficiencies in how we use scarce resources.
Researchers,

Invasion Of Privacy
Surveillance Cameras as an Invasion of Privacy
The book 1984 by George Orwell is one of the most powerful warnings ever issued to caution the
dangers of a totalitarian society. The book features the worst type of society ever imagined, in the
hopes of convincing readers to avoid all paths that would lead to such an invasion of privacy. Until
recently, many have overlooked George Orwell's warning. Today, surveillance cameras are used not
only by the government, but also by individuals and businesses as well. They can be seen going
anywhere, and they affect everyday lives in one way or another. The growing use of surveillance
cameras has led to a large rise in privacy issues. Surveillance cameras are an invasion of privacy and
cause more ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The NGA (National Geospatial–Intelligence Agency) started moving toward a White Center, or a
census designed place, for statistical purposes. A document from the NGA was released in 2012
stating their new focus on human geography, which is defined as a "discipline that looks for
interconnection between people and places." This includes how people use physical landscape and
how it evolves over time. By analyzing human geography, it can be determined where the next
pandemic will likely occur, where transnational criminal activity spread, or when the next mass
migration will occur. In 2014, when the Ebola virus broke out in Africa, the NGA launched an
unclassified public website containing geospatial imagery. This included computerized mapping
tools, which were used to combat the disease and prevent it from spreading from West Africa. This
allowed any onlooker to pinpoint people with the virus and relocate them to a nearby hospital or
airfield (Bamford,

Privacy And Its Effects On The Privacy
but as new technologies arise in combination with the interest of corporations the ability to stay
informed is putting at risk another important aspect of life, which is our privacy. We have become
increasingly dependent on the internet and its applications to get through our days, to find the
information we need, to store and send information, as well as, for entertainment. Privacy can range
from what is contained within email, to what searches you made last night regarding that back pain
you have been suffering for in the past few days. The selfishness behind the decisions corporations
such as googles have taken upon in order to suffice their own financial goals, does not compare to
the discomfort of not having any cyber privacy. Upon the many users Google serves each one has
the right to feel violated, because all are being targeted. While corporations gain, we lose. The
advantage of having information a search away is less pleasing when knowing this information is
being stored for the use of another. Just as recent as May, a ruling in a court of Europe ruled that if
users have the ability to search for the name of a person and their information (ie. Social media
sites) the search engine will be made responsible for the information disbursed, as well as, for
deleting the links to such information in certain circumstances. Such regulations could be
implemented in the United States, what is taking these companies so long? Is it the financial gains
from marketing

Privacy Is An American Invasion Of Privacy
Introduction
Privacy is an especially equivocal idea, in particularly because invasion of privacy is a concept that
is arguably questionable. Privacy has been defined as the right to be left alone without unwarranted
intrusion by government, media, or other institutions or individuals. While this definition serves as a
quick start to the right of privacy, there are still several interpretations as to what may or may not
constitute as an invasion of privacy. What one person may believe to be an innocent curiosity,
another may feel as though it is a deliberate invasion of privacy. Often these disputes make their
way into courtrooms and are subjected to controversy and evaluation. This essay will focus on
appropriation of name or likeness for commercial purposes. First, it will define the right of privacy,
and right of publicity. Next, the evaluation and discussion of four cases in which appropriation of
name or likeness for commercial gain was assessed in courtrooms. Then after, thoughts on current
developments in this area of law will be discussed, as well as suggestions for current working
journalists. Finally, closing and concluding statements will be addressed.
Background
In the mid twentieth century, the tort of appropriation experienced a shift. Courts reoriented the tort
so that it no longer exclusively protected a person's interest in dignity or "privacy," but rather the
pecuniary interest in the commercial exploitation of one's identity, or one's

Privacy Of Personal Privacy
The issue with one's personal privacy coexisting with society's public safety is that it cannot occur.
This controversy is a complex situation due to the large amount of cameras and microphones
installed throughout everywhere you go today. It is almost impossible to not be invasive of one's
privacy. The topic has silently existed for decades, however with technology enhancing at a rapid
rate, the discussion has surfaced and several writers have decided to explore the matter in–depth. In
the "The Anonymity Experiment" written by Catherine Price, she tests this idea of invisibility of
living "off the radar" for an entire week. She withdrew a week's worth of cash, purchased an
untraceable cell phone, cut off all ties that required a name, address and phone number and
proceeded to other numerous amounts of extremes. However, after being anonymous for an entire
week, Price soon discovered that "no matter what you do, you'll never really know if you're
successful at keeping private," (Price 395). She states this because there is no possibility of figuring
out whether you are being tracked or not when it comes to the resources that available out there.
Nonetheless, the measures and the lengths she went to be extreme were necessary to achieve
complete privacy and she believes she "did a pretty good job" (Price 395). Aside from Price's
perspective of this successful privacy, lawyer and writer Wendy Kaminer, communicates a different
view of public safety with privacy. Kaminer writes

Security Of Privacy
Security for Liberty
For the sake of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, American citizens crumple up their own desires
and follow laws such as the speed limit and paying taxes. These laws are given by the government,
created by citizens to protect all residences. After all, you would give up a few priorities for the
name of common good too, right? But there is a borderline between what you should give up and
shouldn't give up. For example, privacy rights. In most cases, people would claim that they have
nothing to hide, but the definition of privacy is not covering the atrocious. Privacy is a fundamental
value of human right; it is our defense and space permitted to us of being ourselves. The right to
privacy is to prevent the invasion ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is similar to Thin Threat, however more abusive to privacy rights. The new Trailblazer project was
" stripped of privacy control." This project was approved by the "Bush White House." A member of
the NSA mentioned that " domestic data mining "could have been done legally" if the N.S.A. had
maintained privacy protections. "But they didn't want an accountable system."" according to the
article "The Secret Sharer" from The New Yorker by Jane Mayer. This clearly confesses that privacy
laws are now disregarded. Privacy laws that protected "domestic without a warrant" was known as
the "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act." Define by the article "The Secret Sharer" from The New
Yorker by Jane Mayer. Was examined by federal judges and has said that the Bush administration
had "legalized certain aspects of the program." In the presidential election of 2008, senator Barack
Obama has voted for this new law and his "administration now relies heavily on such surveillance"
according to New York Times Article, "Federal Judges Find NSA Wiretaps were Illegal" by Charlie
Savage and James Risen. This new program is now approved and in use instead of Thin Threat.
Which implies that the government has neglected our fourth amendment, which "protect people
from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government" defined by the administrative office of
U.S courts. This is unconstitutional. Privacy laws

The Right to Privacy
Personal interest in the right to privacy has intensified in recent years along with the rapid
development of new technologies. A century later, these concerns remain, but many others have
joined them. Advances in information and communications technology have increased our ability to
collect, store and transmit data about individuals. While these advances could be considered useful,
some see them as a situation where anyone can watch and record the actions of every individual, and
where the individual has lost control over information about herself and thus over her very life. As a
reaction to these concerns, new regulations have been formulated to define the rights of individuals
and the limits on the use of technology with respect to personal information.
Among the categories of personal information, health information is of particular interest for a
number of reasons including their sensitivity and serious risks for personal privacy. Also referred to
as Protected Health Information, Personal Health Information (PHI) is a set of data collected by a
health care professional to identify an individual and determine appropriate care. Specifically, these
data include demographic information, medical history, test and laboratory results, and insurance
information. Names, social security numbers, addresses, and birth dates are common identifiers of
health information. Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA), revised in 2009,

Privacy And The Privacy Of Privacy
In today's society, the word "privacy" has become ubiquitous. When discussing whether government
surveillance and data collection pose a threat to privacy, the most common retort against privacy
advocates – by those in favor of databases, video surveillance, spyware, data mining and other
modern surveillance measures – is this line: "If I'm not doing anything wrong, what would I have to
hide?" The allowance of the government's gathering and analysis of our personal information stems
from an inadequate definition of what privacy is and the eternal value that privacy possesses. The
adherents of the "nothing–to–hide" argument say that because the information will never be
disclosed to the public, the "privacy interest is minimal, and the security interest in preventing
terrorism is much more important." 1 In an era where the patterns we leave behind will inevitably
become the focus for whatever authority, the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals
hiding a wrong. In this essay, I will explore the state of online privacy in wake of the government's
warrantless data collection. Respectively, the nothing–to–hide argument and its key variants in more
depth. At the surface, discussions about government data surveillance focuses primarily on the
information collection, use, storage and processing associated with these programs. In Britain, for
example, the government has installed millions of public–surveillance cameras in cities and towns,
which are watched by

Privacy In America
Surveillance cameras are needed for public places in order to ensure safety of all individuals. The
government, for the most part, is on Americans side and wants to ensure Americans protection.
Safety in shopping centers, in traffic, and on the streets is a huge issue in America today. Despite
what the majority of Americans believe, officers do care about the people in the cars and want to
ensure their safety at all times. Privacy is not dead in America, people have violated the trust of
others and as a result have lost complete privacy. Privacy is an issue in shopping centers, traffic, and
on the streets. Shopping centers have become a playing field for kidnappers, shoplifters, and
attackers. It is so easy for a parent to look

Privacy Is An Invasion To Privacy
The right to privacy is granted to all American citizens under the fourth amendment. However, this
rule doesn't seem to apply to us anymore in modern times. The main purpose of technology and the
internet are to give people more 'freedom', and to connect us with the world much faster. But this
freedom comes with a price; that is privacy. Privacy is being invaded in numerous ways through
everyday devices since an enourmous are being surveillanced. The use and advancements of
technology has invaded privacy greatly because of social media and trackers on people's everyday
devices, therefore citizens should be educated on technology use. A main reason that tech
surveillance is an invasion to privacy is because of the use of social media.
On the one hand, some argue that social media is a main factor of the disturbance of privacy. Social
media, especially popular ones such as Facebook or Twitter are known to leak and collect personal
data without the user even knowing. Despite the fact that there are large amounts of privacy settings
that are offered on these sites, they are not much help to protect a user's privacy. A great deal of job
applicants, students, and employees are being demanded to hand over their Facebook and other
social media passwords over. The American Civil Liberties Union, which is an organization whose
stated mission is "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every
person in this country" claims that "The privacy line should

Privacy Policy : Our Privacy
Privacy Policy
Our Privacy Policy was last updated and posted on March 16, 2016. It governs the privacy terms of
our Website, located at http://TourEgypt.co.uk, sub–domains, and any associated web–based and
mobile applications (collectively, "Website"), as owned and operated by New Winner Tours. Any
capitalized terms not defined in our Privacy Policy, have the meaning as specified in our Terms of
Service.
Your privacy is very important to us. Accordingly, we have developed this Policy in order for you to
understand how we collect, use, communicate and disclose and make use of personal information.
We use your Personal Information only for providing and improving the Site. By using the Site, you
agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise
defined in this Privacy Policy, terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our
Terms and Conditions, accessible at http://TourEgypt.co.uk. The following outlines our privacy
policy.
Before or at the time of collecting personal information, we will identify the purposes for which
information is being collected.
We will collect and use of personal information solely with the objective of fulfilling those purposes
specified by us and for other compatible purposes, unless we obtain the consent of the individual
concerned or as required by law.
We will only retain personal information as long as necessary for the fulfillment of those purposes.
We will collect personal

Privacy At Workplaces
As indicated by some people, the privacy right ought to be extended to workplaces. In the
meantime, other individuals feel that this extension would encompass an unnecessary incursion into
the managing rights of the management. In a working environment, the right to privacy of
employees is a primarily controversial legal topic. This is even more of a concern or of an issue
during this age of increased dependence on electronic mail and computers to do business. Because
of innovation technology, employers have been enabled to monitor working environment
correspondence that happens by means of PCs, for example, messages and Internet utilization. A
majority of the employees feel that such observing abuses their privacy rights. Nevertheless, the law
does permit it. Some employee activities like private discussions and actual physical spaces at the
workplace such as the locked desk drawers are under more privacy protections. Hence, there is a
great need for the employers to consider circumstances under which he or she wants to conduct an
investigation.
Another issue that requires watchful adjusting between legitimate business concerns and employee
privacy is romance in the workplace. People have always dated others at work. Truth be told, a 2013
study demonstrated that 38 percent of employees said they had dated a coworker at least once during
their careers, and of these relationships almost a third had led to marriage. But it could be possible
for office romance to pose

Privacy Or No Privacy Analysis
Privacy or no privacy in the work place? Ms. Nancy Flynn is the founder and executive directive of
the Theepollicy Institute, a training and consulting firm that helps employers limit email and internet
risk. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Flynn's complains that management has the right and
responsibility to observer how employees are using social media on and off work hours. Ms. Flynn
Advocates it is all too easy for employees to use social media to bring unwanted attention to
whatever company hired them. She believes that emails, social networking can lead to dangerous
work conditions and it's not as harmless as other might think. Ms. Flynn points out cases to do with
hospital employees ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sure the internet is a great wat to express our self, but other may misconstrue they see on our social
media sites. I sympathize with Mr. Lewis, because employers shouldn't have the right checkup or
screen employee's social media, which that would be their personal life. An employees shouldn't not
be judged on the lifestyle they life after workhours. Depending on what kind of job you have or
trying to acquire yes it may be required but you will be notified. The American is being so political
correct, that is hard to be our self if you have differences views from the majority of the any group
of people. In my opinion there should be laws dealing with cases when employees get fried do to
something they posted in social media. Billy Graham agrees when she writes, Once you've lost your
privacy, you realize you've lost an extremely valuable thing." Basically, Billy Graham is saying
losing your privacy is one of the worst things you can lose, it's a pieces of yourself that you can free
with no judgment. Many people me may disagree with me, but I stay with my opinion. Ms. Flynn
clam that employers have the right to monitor their employees anything they see fit, rests upon the
questionable assumption that would it be morally right. by doing all this would create a hostile work
environment, I do not agrees on employers having so a say on what can and not say on social media.
Being an American you have freedom speech that being said I truly believe that is a violation of my
civil right and nobody should be about to dictate what can you say or not

Should Privacy Be Careful Of Who Is Watching Privacy? Essay
Be Careful of who is Watching Privacy
Issues in Employment Monitoring
Employee monitoring has been on the rise since the boost for technology in the business world.
Different Organizations engage in monitoring of employee's to track performance and to avoid legal
liability, protect business secrets and to address other concerns such as security. Certain monitoring
practices are not upheld by employees because of the downfall it has on their satisfaction of privacy.
Employers typically must not show some of their private monitoring duties while in the workplace,
but how much monitoring they can do can become a huge issue when it's invading natural privacy
rights. There is a debate raging on whether it is moral, ethical and legal for employers to monitor the
actions of their employees. Employer's believe that monitoring is a sure thing because it encourages
positive behavior and discourage illicit activity and to limit liability. Although, with this problem of
monitoring of employees, many are experiencing a negative effect on emotional and physical stress
including fatigue and lack of motivation within the workplace. Employers might choose to monitor
employee's activities using surveillance cameras, or may wish to record employee's activities while
using company owned computers or telephones. Courts are finding that disputes between workplace
privacy and freedom are being complicated with the forward move in advance technology as
traditional rules that govern areas of

Surveillance On Privacy
This week's readings covered approaches to privacy through different disciplines, analyzed privacy
historically and conceptually, addressed negative views on technology's affect on privacy, and
explained what one should reasonable expect in terms of one's own privacy. Outside of these points
are also common themes. Philosophically, privacy has multiple functions, states, and approaches,
including communitarians who sometimes favor limiting privacy for the "greater good," or view
privacy as valuable to society as a whole. Economically, privacy has commercial and market value,
with financial tradeoffs. Sociologically, surveillance is viewed in terms of its affect on individuals
and society in a behavioral sense. Privacy does not have one definition,

Privacy
Running Head: THE EXISTENCE OF PRIVACY WITH TECHNOLOGY
THE EXISTENCE OF PRIVACY WITH TECHNOLOGY
Obediah Howard
Bellevue University THE EXISTENCE OF PRIVACY WITH TECHNOLOGY
Abstract
This research paper will discuss the relationship between privacy and technology. It will attempt to
ascertain if technology and privacy can share the same plane of existence. Benefits and deficiencies
of a particular technology are not hereditary to that technology, but are depend on their application.
The public insists on accountability of technological innovation and assurance that privacy will
remain intact. Striking a balance between enabling technology to enrich lives and restricting it from
invading privacy has to be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The convenience of communicating around the world in an instant or purchasing products and
services over the Internet, and even online banking is not without risk. In fact, any online activity
that involves sharing personal information is inherently risky.
In the social networking arena, users voluntarily divulge personal information online that, prior to
the digital age, would have been considered private and restricted. Without careful and fierce
examination of information prior to submitting it online, users unwittingly and certainly unwillingly
subject themselves to threat of privacy intrusion.
Personal data posted online could be retrieved to take advantage of users, adversely affecting their
lives. GPS coordinates embedded in photos taken from smartphones expose the location of where
the photo was taken and could be used for exploitation. Online identity theft can occur if users are
not more cognizant of online activities. Online social networking services and ecommerce websites
generally collect two types of information: personal details provided by a user and usage data
collected automatically as the user spends time on the internet visiting different areas.
The public is increasingly concerned about privacy protection but will accept a new technology if
the public is properly informed and understand what's happening to its data and the desired
convenience is delivered (Buckler, 2011). The public is aware that, in order to take advantage of
some

The Piracy of Privacy
Throughout history the world has seen significant decreases in privacies. Lately in the United States
of America, many citizens have expressed concern with the government's overreach in personal
privacy. The National Security Agency and other government administrations have been criticized
for their operations. With much criticism, the nation has been seeing a decrease in social networking
users and an increase in hacking abilities amongst citizens. Many have questioned how farther the
government and businesses will go but this can only be told through time.
During the Cold War, at the height of the 'Red Scare' FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover conducted mass
clandestine operations on US citizens. "Even before he became director of the FBI, Hoover was
conducting secret intelligence operations against U.S. citizens he suspected were anarchists, radical
leftists or communists." (NPR) The specifics of these programs were not completely released to
Congress or even the Supreme Court for rulings and oversight. Many politicians, journalists and
everyday citizens were subject to these 'bugs' which included wiretapping, stalking and finding your
day–to–day activities. These spying techniques relate with current internet operations in that the
government is able to track, see and hear everything we do, without our knowledge. On May 17th,
2013 the Washington Post reported that the Department of Justice and the FBI were conducting
surveillance on James Rosen. They soon labeled him a

Invasion Of Privacy
Say Cheese Surveillance cameras are found in places all around the globe. As these cameras become
more popular, people have become concerned with their own privacy. Some common locations of
these cameras are in stores, restaurants, on streets, and in home security systems. When a crime is
committed, there can be verbal evidence provided by bystanders, but there is not more absolute
proof than the proof that is provided by these cameras. Even though some people argue that
surveillance cameras are an invasion of privacy, they definitely do more help than harm.
In 1986, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act was passed. This gave law enforcement the
power to use video surveillance technology. Ever since this was passed, surveillance cameras have
saved many lives and helped solve many crimes. One example of this is the bombing of the world
trade center. After the event, the FBI was able to use video surveillance to collect the evidence that
was needed to convict someone who was involved in the heinous crime. It is possible that if not for
the use of these cameras, this conviction may have never happened. This is just one of the many
instances where surveillance cameras have been extremely useful in providing proof ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is because they do not want the criminal to come after them for releasing information about
their crime. Luckily, the use of surveillance cameras can help when people are afraid to speak up. In
January 2017, two armed men robbed a jewelry store in San Antonio mall. An innocent shopper in
that store was shot and killed as the two robbers fled the scene. Also, six bystanders were injured by
the robbers during this incident. A surveillance camera in the store recorded the incident and help
the police identify the robbers (Absolutely Senseless). If not for the cameras in that store, the
gunmen could have gotten away with not only attempted robbery, but also with

Should Privacy Be Privacy? Essay
Is it possible to have privacy in this day in age? Is somebody watching every move we make? These
questions have been running through my mind ever since I got my iPhone. It's terrifying to believe
that someone could be watching me all the time. Although this isn't on my mind every second of the
day, it is something major to think about. Unfortunately this is an issue that we deal with today.
Whenever we expose ourselves to the public, ninety percent of the time we are being watched. I do
understand the need for surveillance but privacy is a must. Boundaries need to be set in order to
have some sort of rights. The Circle, however, does not understand this concept. These characters
don't believe in privacy, they live life differently. In todays digital age we need to have privacy to
live our lives to the fullest, keep secretes, and to have control of our actions. Everyone has their own
differences towards privacy. Yet at the end of the day privacy involves an important separation from
undesired material. I firmly believe that we have rights in todays digital age but they are constantly
being invaded. Big brother is always watching as many may say. We as civilians don't understand
that the government is taking our personal information without our consent. When you sign up to
any social media website you agree to the terms and conditions (that most people don't read) that go
with that website. When doing so you're agreeing to withdrawal your privacy. Next time you sign up
to a

Privacy Is One Of The Problems Of Media Privacy
Now a day, privacy is one of the problems of media ethics in our life. The Longman dictionary
defines privacy as the state of being able to be alone, not seen or heard by other people, and free
from public attention. We may recognize that it is simple to keep privacy; nonetheless, journalists
and people don't keep it even through they know that it is important.
Furthermore, the tendency that it will be fine even if you do not keep privacy is getting stronger year
by year. One of the reasons is because technology is developing rapidly in the world. This evidence
is that a lot of people bring with them their smart phones and computers to the evidence of this.
Stefano Taddei said, "The results suggest practical implications for online social network providers,
most of all with regard to privacy policies in online environments" (2013). In the future, the
providers will develop and affect us positive and negative through using technology.
I believe that privacy is most important for the future because privacy is the origin of the media
ethics, which is about indecency, control, and truthfulness. I think that privacy is a problem of
particular importance concerning human's virtue in this time.
First, the problem is indecency. Some argue that indecency in media encourages people to mimic the
behavior they see in the news stories from sensational movies. They are prevalent to even children
recently; moreover, these influences will remain strong even when the children became

Persuasive Paper On Privacy And Privacy
Crime has always been a problem in the world.... With the increasing crime rate and terrorist attacks,
as portrayed from the 9/11 attack to... and son on, this forced the government to have an electronic
surveillance to monitor and prevent such tragedies from happening. Even though security and safety
was the main goal for this solution, it still made the people uncomfortable with having the feeling of
being invaded of their privacy. Having surveillance does'nt mean safety, it can also mean .... Privacy
higher value By its very nature, law enforcement is an information–rich activity. One example of
this is the batlle between the FBI and Apple company in February 2016. The FBI called on Apple to
help them hack an iPhone belonging to Islamic State–inspired terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook, who
had opened fire on a local government office building in San Bernardino in December 2015, killing
14 people. This is for the FBI to be able to see and trace the motives and any other plans of the
terrorist. Although Apple had given some data about Farook's iphone activities, the FBI wanted
more from his iphone to the extent that they want his iphone encrypted. Yet, the Apple refused to
comply with the FBI's demand stating that they will not only expose Farook, but also the millions of
iphone users. While the government wanted to protect its citizens, they might also harm the citizen's
safety on the process of doing so. Data encryption can create a hole in the cyber world creating
opportunities for hackers and cyber–criminals. But Houston police chief Harold Hurtt once said, " I
know a lot of people are concerned about Big Brother, but my response to that is, if you are not
doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" While it may be true that one must not be
afraid if innocent, the main concern of the citizens is the security of their personal information such
as; bank accounts, passwords, private pictures, and health records which can be hacked and leaked
online. As California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, commented: "Once you have holes in
encryption, the rule is not a question of if, but when those holes will be exploited and everything
you thought protected

Privacy Undertood

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Divya Watson

More from Divya Watson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Privacy Undertood