Pre-Program Evaluation Essay

Pre-Program Evaluation Essay
The purpose of our evaluation is to assess if the girls who participate in the GRL program, apply the
skills and knowledge they acquire upon completion of the program. To answer this question, we will
use a pre–experimental research design consisting of pre–test and post–test surveys, as well as a
post–test focus group for more in depth narratives. The purpose of the pre–test and the post–test is to
ascertain the types of behaviors and habits the girls have prior to their participation in the GRL
program and see how these change after the 16–week program.
To answer our main question we will first categorize the range of behaviors and habits as desirable
or undesirable. Then using descriptive statistics we will determine the frequency of ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Our findings will demonstrate the range of behaviors, habits, and understandings the girls have in
the areas of coping skills, life skills, professional pathways, and healthy relationships, prior to and
after their participation in GRL. Descriptive statistics will help us see if there is a change in the girls'
understanding and behaviors between the two points in time, the direction of the change.
Additionally, a paired sample t–test will help us understand if the change is statistically significant.
We will also be able to demonstrate in what areas the program was most impactful, and if any
demographic factors predicted the program's effectiveness. However, due to the small sample size
and the lack of a control group, we cannot control for the validity of the findings nor necessarily
assume generalizability.
The findings from the evaluation of the GRL program will be disseminated in a comprehensive
formal report for accountability, participant progress, and program effectiveness. However,
abbreviated versions of the report may be used according to the audience to which the information is
directed. The GRL focus group discussion will be recorded and sent to GRL staff to view for any
program improvements or necessary changes. The findings of this evaluation will be used by GRL
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Implementation Of A Transitional Care Program Evaluation
For a transitional care program evaluation, it is requisite to combine two separate theories to aid in
addressing the problem of poor transitional care outcomes, the process of measuring outcomes, and
the creation of recommendations for improvement. A middle range nursing theory, Transitions
theory centers on the process of individuals' transitions and addresses the barriers to and principles
of successful transitional outcomes (Meleis, 2010). The theory is both descriptive and predictive, it
can be used to further describe and define the problem of poor transitions and its barriers as well as
identify outcomes that signal successful interventions in individuals (Meleis, Sawyer, Im, Messias,
& Schumacher, 2000). The indicators of successful interventions as defined by Transitions Theory
can guide the selection of the types of outcomes to be measured by the program evaluation to ensure
that outcomes that reflect transitional success are selected. Furthermore, the principles of healthy
transitions identified by Transitions Theory will aid in the creation of recommendations for program
improvement. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) will be joined with Transitions Theory in the
program evaluation. Although originally developed by business managers, CQI is best known for its
use in manufacturing settings, specifically in the automotive industry (Radawski, 1999). CQI was
created with customers (patients) as the center of its philosophy; consequentially, the model

Evaluation Plan for Arkansas School of the 21st Century...
Program Evaluation Plan for Arkansas School of the 21st Century Program CUR732 University of
Phoenix Program Evaluation Plan for Arkansas School of the 21st Century Program Background
The Paragould School of the 21st Century was the first site implementing the Zigler model in
August 1992. Startup funds were initially provided by Paragould businesses to renovate an older
elementary campus. The district has grown from the Elmwood campus of seven classrooms infants –
four year olds to opening the Oakwood building housing 5 additional classrooms. S21C is an
integral part of the Paragould School District. By August, 2013, seven preschool classrooms will
join kindergarten and first grade students at the new Paragould Primary building ... Show more
The breadth or narrowness of goals espoused by 21st Century programs (and how well these goals
align with centers' activities) is likely to exert a strong influence on the types of effects achieved by
individual centers and the program as a whole. While programs can produce a range of unintended
results, it is reasonable to assume that programs will effect changes in the specific outcomes they
seek to influence, rather than those they see as outside their mission or current capability (Jason,
2008). For example, programs that concentrate on improving reading achievement and exclude areas
of creative expression may see some improvements in achievement, but they are unlikely to show
very many other intermediate or long–term effects (for example, higher aspirations). Importantly,
this implies that after–school programs more closely approximating the broad mix of emphases
defining the 21st Century "intended program" are likely to exhibit impacts across a broader range of
outcomes (Bryant, Clifford, Early, & Little, 2005). Current State of the Program Pre–K is
developing in Arkansas as a grand experiment for public–private education. Arkansas Pre–K today
is inside and outside of K–12 schools, inside public schools, institutions and centers, as well as
inside private ones. For example, at the beginning of 2006, 48

Program Evaluation : An Essential Tool For Value Check
Introduction Over the years, program evaluation is an essential tool for value check of either the
whole program or some aspect of the program (Psoavac and Carey, 2007). Program evaluation is
more popular in health related educational programs. In order to determine the extent the
educational system achieves its stated objectives and goals, Tylers in the 1930s developed a model
(Owston, 2008). The model developed by Tylers shows a deliberate simplification of how the
objectives of the education program are achieved. Tylers evaluation model was used in one or two
generations of educational program evaluators (Scriven, 1999), and acts as a basis for developing
the present models. However, the present models went beyond determining the ... Show more
The aim of this essay is to provide an overview of three evaluation models based on their different
conceptual approaches. Kirkpatrick, logic and Context/input/process/product (CIPP) models are the
three models discussed in this essay. The three models were chosen because of their relevance and
popularity in evaluating educational programs. The first part of this essay explains in details with
examples the three models. Subsequently, an objective of a Nigerian physiotherapy educational
program will be used to compare and contrast the three models. The overview of the models The
conceptual approaches to evaluation of an educational program are not the techniques, rather the
major theoretical assumptions for each of the evaluation models (Fitzpatrick et al., 2004). Goal–
oriented (objective –oriented) and system–oriented (management–oriented) are the two popular
approaches adopted by some of the evaluation models. For instance, Logic model adopted the goal–
oriented approach while the CIPP adopted the system–oriented approach. Kirkpatrick model's
multi–level application is flexible to adapt to any of the approaches. The goal–oriented approach
simply determines the extent to which the goals of a program are achieved (Eseryel, 2002), while
system–oriented, specifically the management–oriented approach, is based on using systems of
education as input, process and output to provide information for decision making ( Alkin, 2011).

The Four Levels Of Training Evaluation Is Defined As A...
Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of training evaluation is defined as a technique for evaluating training
programs, created by Donald Kirkpatrick in 1959. The Kirkpatrick model is the worldwide standard
for evaluating the effectiveness of training. The four levels of this technique incorporate assurance
of how learners respond to the learning procedure, the achievement of skill acquisition by learners,
the degree to which workplace behavior after the training demonstrates skill acquisition, and
quantifiable outcomes, including expanded profits or decreasing any defects observed. Donald
Kirkpatrick, Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin and past president of the American
Society for Training and Development (ASTD), initially ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
This evaluation technique is defined as a detailed study of a market or geographical area to gather
data on the attitudes, impressions, opinions, satisfaction level and etc. by targeting and polling a
section of the people. Surveys are low cost and also very effective as long as the participant is
unbiased. Surveys can be administered to the participants through a various number of ways. The
questionnaires can be simple and sent by email or through the Internet, which is easily accessible.
Online surveys have quickly become a popular way of gathering data and conducing surveys. It is
also extremely convenient and does not take up much time. The surveys should have only relevant
questions that reflect the training that was just conducted. It should also be conducted right after the
training when the trainees are still sure about what they have experienced. If the survey is handed to
them too late, the data collected could differ. Simple questions should be asked with a "yes or no"
option as well as a 1 to 10 rating scale. At the end of the survey, there should be an open–ended box
where the trainees are able to freely write how they feel about the training as well as what can be
improved.
Learning
This is when the organization measures what the trainees have learned and how much has their
knowledge has expanded as an outcome of the training. At the start of the training session, there
should be a specific list of learning objectives. These points should be

Do You Want A Performance Audit Or A Program Evaluation?...
Government organizations are developed out of the funding provided by the government to meet the
needs of the community. In order to ensure that these agencies are adequately meeting these needs,
they are reviewed by internal or external entities. This paper will review performance audits and
program program evaluations as a form of assessments that may be conducted as well as their
effectiveness in identifying the performance expectations. Additionally, the paper will review
California's Auditor Controller methods of review and the impact it has on changing current
practices of organizations. Overall, the research found will demonstrate that while a variety of
assessments exist the availability to these two forms of reviews are limited due of the tie to funding.
Types of Review
In recent times, many departments and agencies are coming under review to determine their
effectiveness. The organizations' capacity to manage or effectiveness in what it sets out to do is what
is a question. In the article, "Do you want a Performance Audit or a Program Evaluation?", by
Dwight F. Davis, the author distinguishes these two practices. The author defines performance
audits as it "...involve[s] a determination of the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of
government organization..." (Davis, 1990, pg35). While program evolution is the "...systemic
application of social research procedures in assessing the conceptualization and design,
implementation and utility..."(Davis, 1990, pg35).

The Program Oriented Evaluation Approaches Essay
Activity 1 Chapter 6 (Page 153)–Objectives/Program–Oriented Evaluation Approaches (OOEA): 20
Points 1. In one sentence, describe the Objectives Oriented Evaluation Approach to program
evaluation. The assessment is used to decide whether a program accomplishes the goals of the
program and ensures stakeholders stay on task producing constantly improving results by inspecting
all areas of the program, including determining needs, analyzing program costs, examining
employee roles and their responsibilities, conducting an economic and efficiency audit, and deciding
the next steps the program should undertake. 2. Take one program in your school district and
describe how the OOEAApproach could be used to evaluate its efficacy. Westside Consolidated
School District participates in the Summer Food Service Program that provides free meals for
individuals aged eighteen and under. An experienced unbiased evaluator should lead the evaluation
and preferable have experienced unbiased assistants (i.e. out of the district evaluators or evaluators
with no direct contact or vested interest in the program). The evaluation should involve the
inspection and understanding of the stated goals of the program (i.e. to provide meals to students
eighteen and under in the summer). Stated goals should be analyzed to identify vague or redundant
goals. A prior Risk Assessment Matrix is then used, modified or new one created to identify
common issues of similar programs compared to the program

Program Evaluation Critique Essay
Program Evaluation critique to: Trish Mckay from: steven wayock subject: Team read– program
evaluation Critique date: [ 10/31/2012 ] cc: Professor Turner, Margo Jones, Trish McKay Steven
Wayock's Independent program evaluation Critique Team Read's program evaluation completed by
the independent evaluator Margo Jones took an overall look at Team Read based off of statistical
analysis conducted in two different phases. These phases evaluated different scopes of Team Read,
the readers the coaches and mentors. I Steven Wayock will critique this program evaluation based on
the information at hand and will offer Team Read my insight to what this evaluation did properly
and what this evaluation lacked based off my expertise. Team ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This question which is narrowed down by the results in a complicated statistical form does not
address the fact that each comparison group that Margo chose was not labeled as deficient in the
classroom or on their standardized test as the Team Read readers were when they were chosen for
Team Read. These results that were detailed in Margo's evaluation lacked credibility as the sample
comparison group was generally not the same as the Team Read program participants. The
participant often took what is referred to as a similar test but differs in comparison which can cause
validity issues around the board for the independent evaluator. The second research question the
independent evaluator chose to ask was how does the program affect the reading coaches? This
question was extremely general and could be answered in a number of different ways; Margo chose
a questionnaire that was answered by Team Read coaches to determine whether or not they were
impacted by the Team Read Program. The results were generally positive as Trish McKay had felt
the same way about the results, as they were looked upon in a positive light. The questionnaire was
administered towards the late stages of the school year as students were beginning to wind down all
programs and head into summer. This questionnaire differed in response from one area to the next
on certain questionnaire questions which directly gives the Team Read program information and
data that can be interpreted to change policy

Program Evaluation Design Preparation Assignment
Program Evaluation Design Preparation Assignment I Silvana M. Ramirez San Jose State University
Program Evaluation Design Preparation Assignment I This program evaluation examines the
effectiveness of maintaining the emotional, intellectual, and social functioning of individuals with
Alzheimer's disease and the assistance in which caregivers receive through support groups as
provided by Respite and Research for Alzheimer's disease agency located in San Jose, California,
serving the elderly in the adult day program. Respite and Research for Alzheimer's Disease is a
nonprofit corporation that was established in 1984. The Alzheimer's Activity Center was established
in San Jose's Willow Glen area in 1986 ("Respite and Research for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The program includes services that increase the use of cognitive skills, stimulate interaction on
group and personal levels, and encourage mobility and stability. This program offers support groups
and activities for the elderly such as music therapy, garden discovery, cooking group, and arts and
crafts ("Respite and Research for Alzheimer's Disease," 2014). Furthermore, the program offers
assistance to the caregivers in ways to assist their loved one or patient with Alzheimer's. The
Alzheimer's Activity Center services include but are not limited to, caregiver support groups, frontal
lobe dementia support group, men's support group, and more. Such programs as the caregiver
support group directly involve the elderly with Alzheimer's disease and the caregiver. These
programs assist the caregiver and the Alzheimer's patient in better caring for their loved one
suffering from this disease. This program also offers resources for the caregivers such as links on the
website to find proper day programs for patients with Alzheimer's, respite services, caregiver
techniques, and the opportunity to set up a time to speak about medication and concerns. This can be
done during a support group

Evaluation Of A Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation Time–Out is the title for the proposed program, providing prevention and
solution–based services to African American high school student–athletes in Hampton, Virginia
(Baskerville, 2015). To begin with, this paper will provide a comprehensive program evaluation
model for the program. Secondly, it will outline the evaluation framework the program will use to
evaluate the program. Next, the paper will provide a timeline detailing when critical evolution task
for the program will take place. Leading to, how program evaluation will maintain the program's
sustainability. From there, the paper will explain how the evaluation results will be shared with the
stakeholders and the community. In conclusion, it will discuss strategies to create a culture of
evaluation within the program. Theoretical framework The program evaluation begins with the
program design to assess overall effectiveness and efficiency of implementation of the program
(Calley, 2011). To illustrate the program evaluation, a theoretical framework has been developed
using Calley's Comprehensive Program Development Model's for the proposed program, using the
three major evaluations: fidelity assessment, process evaluation, outcomes evaluation. Fidelity
Assessment Fidelity assessment evaluates a program's ability to implement its original program
design. With that said, the Treatment Fidelity Assessment Checklist will be used to assess the
program's fidelity. In other words, the

A Program Evaluation is an important factor in determining if an agency is producing successful
results. Usually a program evaluation is requested or brought forth by a specific concern that is in
need of being addressed. This type of practice–based research method provides agencies with
accountability. Sometimes a program evaluation is needed in order for some agencies to continue to
receive funding to keep their programs, to meet accreditation standards, and to ensure clients are
being helped by the programs (Royse, 2011). Before performing a program evaluation, it is
important to consider many factors such as time, resources, audience, and purpose. A time limit for
an agency evaluation could change the direction the evaluation goes. Resources are definitely an
important aspect of the evaluation. A lack of resources could result in a simpler process whether
than a copyrighted tool for an evaluation. The type of audience and purpose will in turn decide
which type of method is to be implemented. The written report should be prepared for the type of
audience that will be examining it. Each audience will require their unique writing style (Royse,
2011). For example, if the audience is a group of high school students, it would be necessary to
write in a less complex writing style.
Project Identification The project identified in this paper is of the Northeastern State University
(NSU) Social Work Practicum program. "The Northeastern State University 's Social Work

Evaluation Of An Anti Bullying Program
Initially we thought we were going to be able to conduct an evaluation, but with lack of time, we
realized that was no longer feasible. Instead, we decided to take the idea of focusing on the
evaluation tools and develop an evaluation how–to of Rachel's challenge. Our goal was to have a
manual to present to UVMC and allow them to continue the evaluation further with our guided
manual. During our evaluation of Rachel's Challenge, it became a concern to us that this program
wasn't really a bullying prevention program, but more a program focused on character building.
After a lack of communication between the UVMC and Rachel's Challenge connections we decided
to shift our focus. We still wanted our final product to be a manual, but decided to focus on
presenting it to a broader audience. What we went forward with was developing a how–to manual
for evaluating an anti–bullying program. As I had already done some background research, getting
started went smoothly.
The process of developing the manual began with our previous class work. We used our complied
work as a reference point to set up the contents of the manual. Since our class work was focused on
Rachel's Challenge we had to redo everything, minus my background work. Section were divided
between Taylor and I and we each were responsible for three sections and manual and split
responsibility for continuing research on the background section. Dr. Green suggested we meet with
Randy, a research specialist from the library.

Program Planning and Evaluation Paper Hsm/270
Program Planning and Evaluation Paper
HSM/270
June 17th, 2012
Bonita Comer
Program Planning and Evaluation Paper Program planning is a process to achieve a particular goal
and/or mission. Program planning is an organized process through which a set of coordinated
activities or interventions is developed to address and facilitate change in some or all of the
identified problems. Program evaluation provides useful information for improving the programs
and the service delivery systems. Program evaluation is to improve the program planning,
effectiveness, design, and efficiency. The two are different processes, but ideally they hold the same
goals and/or mission. The evaluation process takes place after the planning of a ... Show more
With this being stated; a program evaluation should be performed to see what changes need to be
made to help their mission. It is clear that the services that they are providing are not as effective
any more. Some technical and political aspects of the program planning and evaluation I might
encounter in the program scenario I chose, may be trying to reach out to those individuals that are or
have been involved with the criminal justice system. Funding may not allow for these services to be
provided to these individuals. Another aspect may be that the community is not aware of this
program and the services that it provides. Grants could be another issue. If the program cannot show
its effectiveness then grants may not be given and this could results in loss of services provided. A
political aspect could be that one "favoritism" over evaluations. Some may use their political
influence to "guide" the evaluation to present or not present the "selected" truth. (Yuen, 2003) There
are many pressures from the individual who performs the evaluation to make it look; "good" This is
a big political concern for programs. The technical concern or aspect could be the service delivery
method, using the inputs and outputs to be utilized to perform the programs mission. The first
concern would be how they will approach their specific target. The program planning should have
this dilemma worked out so they will

Consider how you would evaluate your program relative to each of the components. Linnan and
Steckler (2002) describe the following key process evaluation components: Context–aspects of the
larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach–the proportion of the intended
audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose–delivered–The amount of intended units
of each program component that is delivered; Dose–received–the extent to which participants
engage with the program; Fidelity–the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended (
Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.526). Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health
interventions have been effective and they also intend to improve the health of the target population.
Evaluation helps define the worth of a program. It is imperative to conduct program evaluation in
order to provide feedback to improve the effectiveness of the program. Evaluation plans should be
developed at the beginning of the health program interventions. The CDC framework for program
evaluation is comprised of the following steps:1) Engage stakeholders; 2) Describe the program; 3)
Focus on evaluation design; 4) Gather credible evidence; 5) Justify conclusions; 6) Ensure use and
share lessons learned. Also listed are the four standards for assessing the quality of evaluation
activities: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy (CDC, 2013). According to an article in the
CDC (2013), "As noted in the

Types and Significance of Evaluation of Training Program
ASSIGNMENT # 1 Types and significance of evaluation of training program INTRODUCTION
Training is vital for any and every organization. With the changing socio–economic and
technological relevance of training, the definitions, scope, methods and evaluation of training
program have also changed. One of the earlier classic definitions of training is 'bringing lasting
improvement in skills in jobs'. The present day definitions take a multi–dimensional perspective
enveloping the needs of individuals, teams, organizations and the society. The steps in the training
program development are planning, programme implementation, and programme evaluation and
follow–up. The evaluation of any training system helps measure the' knowledge gap', what is ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This includes giving and receiving verbal feedback. Process Evaluation answers the question, "What
did you do?" It focuses on procedures and actions being used to produce results. * It monitors the
quality of an event or project by various means. Traditionally, working as an "onlooker," the
evaluator describes this process and measures the results in oral and written reports. * Process
evaluation is the most common type of training evaluation. It takes place during training delivery
and at the end of the event. Most of you probably have done it in one form or another. The question
we try to answer is "What did you do?" * Following is a sample list of the kinds of information
collected to answer this question: * Demographic data (characteristics about participants and their
physical location) * What was taught; how long it took * Whether or not the objectives were met *
Who did what to whom, and when 3) Outcome evaluation Outcome evaluation determines whether
or not the desired results (e.g., what participants are doing) of applying new skills were achieved in
the short–term. Outcome Evaluation answers the question, "What happened to the knowledge,
attitudes, and behaviors of the intended population?" * Specific and observable changes in behaviors
that lead toward healthier or more productive lifestyles and away from problem–causing actions
indicate a

Overview Program Evaluation Essay
Overview of Program Evaluation
HCS/549
April 15, 2013
Overview of Program Evaluation
Program evaluation is a useful resource to evaluate programs that are currently an organization or an
industry is making good use of. Evaluating programs not only bring out the strengths and
weaknesses but also identifies the picture of the plans implemented. The purpose of this paper is to
examine the purpose for program evaluation and why it can be useful to an organization. This paper
will speak of the five most common types of program evaluation models and will select one
program evaluation model to describe from week one's reading.
Purpose for program evaluation
"There is only one overall purpose for program evaluation activities: ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Each of the models discussed includes emphases that are valid aspects of program evaluation. "One
value of thinking about models lies in developing an appreciation of the range of questions
evaluators can consider. The specific questions being addressed by an evaluation or the specific
aspects of the program setting often make one or another of the models especially useful" (Posavac
& Carey, 2007, p.23–25). The models: The traditional model, Social Science model, Industrial
Inspection model, Black Box Evaluation, and Objectives–Based Evaluation model, are very
common and helpful in different types of organizations and environment. The model that is very
interesting to use and describe is the Objective–Based Evaluation model.
Objectives–Based Evaluation
In an effort to design an evaluation for a specific program, some approaches emphasize working
with clearly stated program goals and objectives so that the degree to which such goals and
objectives are achieved can be measured. "This has been the most prevalent model used for program
evaluation. Examining goals and objectives seems to be an essential aspect of evaluation; it is
important to judge a program relative to its particular structure and what it is designed to achieve"
(Posavac & Carey, 2007, p.23–25). It is very important for organizations to clearly and closely
examine their

Evaluation Plan For Training And Development Program
Training and development is a key component to any organization's current and future success. By
fostering a learning oriented organization, you are creating a culture and environment that will
deliver high quality service and products, anticipate and prepare for the future needs of the
organization, and increase both customer and employee satisfaction. Training and development must
be supported by the Human Resource function, and utilized by senior management to drive staffing
strategy and decisions, performance management, and meet operational goals. In order for the
training and development program to be successful at all levels, it must be properly designed,
implemented, and evaluated. Below, we will discuss the seven steps of the training design process to
demonstrate the best practices and organizational importance of a strong training and development
program.
The seven steps of the training design process are: a needs assessment, ensuring employee readiness
for training, creating a learning environment, ensuring the transfer of training, developing an
evaluation plan, selecting a training method, and monitoring and evaluating the program (Noe,
2013, p. 11). Starting with the needs assessment, it consists of "three elements: organizational
analysis, person analysis, and task analysis" (Noe, 2013, p. 121). Organizational analysis "is
concerned with identifying whether training suits the company's strategic objectives, and whether
the company has the budget, time, and

Program Evaluation Program
Developing a program can be a difficult task to achieve. You have to take many things into
consideration and think about short– and long–term operation of the program. To make a program
successful you have to evaluated the program, and share program results to get feedback. Program
evaluating are necessary because it forces community nutritionist to determine if the program will
be a success or a failure. When they are evaluating the program the are looking for ways to improve
their program, to show accountability, and to document the program in general. When they are
improving their program they are: 1) examine their initial goals, new making goals that need to be
achieved, 2)identity and improving any weakness that are found in the content of the program and 3)
measuring the effectiveness of the staff,leadership, and resources of the program. When the program
is evaluated to show accountability it justify the budget, staff resources, program and procedures,
and compares program outcomes against program standards. When evaluating to document the
program it records client attendance and progress, the completeness rate of the program by clients,
and documents the weakness of the program by staff and clients.The utilization evaluation findings
can help expanding the program, help increase funding, and improve weaknesses of the program. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is important to share the results of a successful program because it helps other programs to reach
their goals and obtain goals that might have been thought to be beyond reach.A failed program
shows pitfalls that can be a avoided and improve on. It helps other programs avoid spending funds
on flawed program ideas that did not work. Sharing results of a program evaluation can also
increase feedback to make the program

Evaluation Of The Article Program Evaluation Essay
Introduction The article Program Evaluation: Strategies to Facilitate Agencies' Use of Evaluation in
Program Management and Policy Making discusses the United States Government Accountability
Office attempting to view how various federal agencies utilize program evaluations The
Government Accountability Office (GOA) "examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal
programs and policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help
Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions"( U.S Government Accountability
Office, 2013, p. 1). The article discusses a sample of 4,391 individuals split from a larger population
of those employed by federal agencies. Of the population the individuals consisted of program
managers and supervisors from 24 executive agencies including the Chief Evaluation Office,
Administration for Children and Families, and Food Nutrition Service. From the dates of 2012 and
2013 a web–based survey was administered in an effort to view how program and performance
evaluations are being used and complications of performance measures and information. Part I One
strength according to the article, when the participants were interviewed is that some of the mangers
from these federal agencies who had evaluations reported the tool is useful and beneficial to
improving and assess the programs. It was founded that program activities such as developing
performance goals and sharing what works are ways that benefitted their

Program Planning & Program Evaluation; Peace Domestic...
Program Planning & Program Evaluation; PEACE Domestic Violence Agency HSM 270
Abstract The overall purpose of this paper is to compare program planning with program evaluation
in a human service organization by describing how the two components are related. There will be
examples of how program planning and evaluation interrelate with the PEACE Domestic Violence
Agency scenario from Appendix B. We will also look at the technical and political aspects of
program planning and evaluation that might encounter in the PEACE Domestic Violence Agency
scenario, and how these aspects could affect the planning and evaluation process. Program Planning
& Program Evaluation; PEACE Domestic Violence Agency According to Michael ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are a number of methods of collecting data, some of them are – questionnaire, surveys,
checklists, interviews, observations, focus group etc (Cordray, 1986; Einhorn and Hogarth, 1986).
Once the data has been collected, it needs to be used effectively for efficient results. This is where
program planning comes in. According to Trochim and Linton (1986), there is a need for concept
mapping for planning and evaluation processes. A number of steps are involved in concept planning,
such as – * Identifying the most critical need of the clientele * Accessing our ability to satisfy that
need * Planning and delivering program to address that need * Evaluating the outcome of the
process Program planning is the implementation of evaluation process. It is the groundwork where
priorities are decided and the results are analyzed on a measurable scale. In the present scenario,
PEACE will use findings from the government data collection project (Secondary data collection
technique) to inform the development of family and domestic violence strategic planning, and to
benchmark the impact of initiatives to violence and trauma in Portland. This will also include data
by conducting comprehensive surveys across the community, and studying police reports on the
related cases (Primary data collection technique) to know the reasons and impact of violence. This
data will be used by a

Program Evaluation Essay
To ensure that my program evaluation is objective, credible and fair I would employ internal and
external counselors or advisors as well as align my program evaluation with the standards and
practices of the professional body of evaluators. These "advisors "may or may not include the
program stakeholders, but would not negate the formal process of collaborating with key
stakeholders. Rather, the purpose of my advisor team is to see and hear things I missed. These
advisors are to me as the evaluator as the football coach is to the quarterback: the coach/ advisors
supply information to the quarterback/evaluator who directs the game/evaluation. In addition, I
would employ Fitzpatrick's advice to consider a wide array of methods to collect information.
Multiple methods can be used to increase validity, to enhance understanding, or to inform
subsequent data collection. (Fitzpatrick, 2011). By using multiple methods, instead a singular
method helps to keep my evaluation objective and credible. Employing multiple methods also helps
to check my personal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moving from my informal evaluation methods acquired from examine my biases, to mitigate against
bias in a more" formal "evaluation process the evaluator still first must examine themselves honestly
and be clear on their position, their allegiances and their adversaries. It goes without saying that
evaluation reports should not be unfair, unbalanced or inaccurate. Yet truth is elusive and even the
most scrupulous evaluator must struggle to see that carefully collected and analyzed information is
not later distorted, intentionally or unintentionally in presentation. Then look at the American
Evaluation Association's Guiding Principles, briefly stated

Consider how you would evaluate your Program relative to each of the components Linnan and
Steckler (2002) describe the following key process evaluation components: Context–aspects of the
larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach–the proportion of the intended
audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose–delivered–The amount of intended units
of each program component that is delivered; Dose–received–the extent to which participants
engage with the program; Fidelity–the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended (
Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.525). Program evaluation is an important tool to show that the health
interventions have been effective and they also intend to improve the health ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
As such, it's important that the evaluation approach be useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate" (CDC,
2013). All the above components of the framework should be applied to the adolescent tobacco
program evaluation. What are your indicators for each component? The proportion of the intended
target audience (adolescents) that participates in an intervention (tobacco cessation) is often
measured by attendance. Reach is a feature of the target audience. Dose delivered is a function of
efforts of the intervention providers. The extent to which participants actively engage with, interact
with, are receptive to, and/or use materials or recommended resources (e.g., Web sites, videos,
brochures, newspaper advertisements, posters, telephone quit line, behavioral therapy etc.) (Linnan
& Steckler, 2002). Dose received is an attribute of the target audience and it measures the extent of
commitment of participants with the intervention (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). "Fidelity is a function
of the intervention providers. A composite score that indicates the extent to which the intervention
has been implemented and received by the intended audience" (Linnan & Steckler, 2002). According
to an article by Wierenga et al. (2013), "Of these eight components, six components focus on
implementation (reach, recruitment,

Program Evaluation Paper
Choosing an evaluation depends, to a great extent, on the program being presented to stakeholders,
clients or other individuals; the program must encompass different aspects that would directly affect
the plan's efficiency, effectiveness, cost and overall purpose.
Alvin Independent School District, for instance, has a program in place which assists individuals
between the ages of 18 and 21 to earn a high school diploma. The goal of this program is to target
the demographic needs of the community and the drop–out rate within the school district. Further,
this program aligns itself with the school district's goals and academic performance, which states
that "emphasis will be placed on initiating strategies aimed at closing the achievement ... Show more
In this case, applying a utilitarian model called the objectives–oriented model would allow the
individuals conducting the evaluation to "determine the extent to which program objectives have
been achieved" (Daniels, 2010, p. 176). Further, in this case, the application of the Provus
discrepancy model can be part of program's assessment of data which establishes whether the
program requires improvements, adjustments, termination or, if the program should continue on its
course (Daniels, 2010). It is the design of Provus discrepancy model which would allow the
counselor and administrators to effectively present the results of the program for the evaluation
targets concrete results, such as, student enrollment and graduation. Every academic year, OPTIONS
accepts students who experience personal circumstances which do not allow them to continue an
education and, thus, and encounter difficulties in acquiring a job. Until now, the OPTIONS program
has been an invaluable asset to the community, the school district, and, above all, the individual
student who surpasses different obstacles to obtain a higher degree of

Evaluation Of A Therapy Program For Adults 21 Years And...
Two Specific Programs
Sensory Program
A therapy program targeted to adults 21 years and older, the Sensory Program focuses on sensory
integration, rehabilitation, and quality of life (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). Sensory integration is
the process of absorbing sensory information followed by organizing and assigning meaning to said
information, and thus, making it worthwhile (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). To respond
appropriately and effectively to given sensory input and/or a situation, one experience appropriate
sensory integration (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). The cliental of Aptus impairments in the way
they integrate, process, and organize sensory information, resulting in feelings of confusion, stress
and anxiety, frustration and fear (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). Thus, the goal of the sensory
program is to reduce feels of anxiety, develop coping strategies, and offer opportunities in which to
learn self–regulation and self–expression (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). As such clients
participate in activities such as a period within the "Snoezelen Room," "relaxation time" and
"music" (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016). The "Snoezelen Room" is an artificially designed space
that offers a relaxing environment through soothing lighting, music, gentle vibrations, and tactile
sensations (Aptus Treatment Centre, 2016).
Areas of Strength
Certain staff members of the Sensory Program continuously exude a love for their job, working with
those with developmental

Health Program Evaluation: Northern Territory Emergency...
Introduction: This evaluation is based on the outcome of the Northern Territory Emergency
Response (NTER) program which was aimed at examining whether specific measures had been
effective and comprehensive and led to improved and sustainable outcomes in safety, health,
education and employment of indigenous people in Australia(1). The evaluation of NTER was
carried out by a group of experts from different fields. This assignment will focus on the
interventions such as Child Health Check Initiative (CHCI) which was introduced to improve the
general health status of the children in the Northern Territory. This was also a component of NTER.
Key evaluation questions will be considered for this intervention as they help to determine the
design, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
d) How many specialists in different fields of medicine will be required for the screening programs?
Adequate and efficient human resource is key to the success of screening programs (3). Impact
evaluation questions might focus on the intended program outcomes on child health and include: (a)
What was the likely impact of the CHCI on the indigenous children? Did the program helped to
reduced mortality and morbidity among the indigenous children? (b) Was the program responsive
and culturally acceptable within the indigenous communities? How did the guardians of the children
responded to the initiative? Was it compulsory or voluntary in terms of participation? (c) Did the
CHCI reached the intended population? How many children get checked and received treatment?
How many children refused to come for checkup? (d) How were the follow–up programs
coordinated? What was the impact of the follow–up services? Was there any policy reform due to
the implementation of the program? ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Virginia, M. (2008) described
ethics as principles for morality with intention to prevent harm, promote wellness, respect, justice
and fairness (4). Evaluation of projects in communities especially with people considered to be
vulnerable have to consider the need to protect the participants from any perceived harm. Wright, M.
et al (2007) reported on the seriousness of respecting Aboriginal people in any interventions that
concern them (5). A School Nutrition

Memo Program Evaluation Of Internal Auditing System
Project : Memo program evaluation of internal auditing system in Pharmaceutical industry Goal: the
main objectives of this memo is to discuss the purpose, finding the targeted clients, and how the
internal auditing system in Pharmaceutical industry works. The revise and improve your evaluation
questions from earlier making sure to focus strongly on the measurement of outcomes. You should
clearly identify outcomes and indicators of success for each evaluation question dealing with these
outcome measures. Include a table showing what data will be necessary, how it will be collected,
and how it will be used to answer each of your evaluation questions The main objectives of this
memo is to discuss the purpose, finding the targeted clients, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The following key elements provide strong rationale for conducting internal audits: Results as part
of the process performance and product quality monitoring system Implement corrective actions and
preventive actions (CAPA) as a result of audit observations Include audit results as part of
management review of the quality system Consider feedback from periodic internal audits and
external audits in continuous improvement decisions. Consulting people is not a new idea. What is
new is the growing prominence and frequency of consultation activities, particularly those involving
large numbers of participants. As the prominence of consultation increases, it is sometimes unclear
precisely how client consultation helps managers make better decisions. Managers need to know
that, and how to design the consultation process accordingly. Client consultation is linked to the
measurement of client satisfaction. You must identify the gaps between what clients expect or need
from the organization and the service they feel they are actually receiving. Definition In the context
of delivering quality services, consultation is a process that permits and promotes the two–way flow
of information between clients of government services and the government. Goal and Objectives
The goal of client consultation is to discover your clients ' opinion of the services they receive from
your department and the way these services

Introduction The purpose of a program evaluation is to assess working programs and determine if
the outcomes are sufficiently effective (Houser, 2015). Program Evaluations are a type of action
research leading to improved programs and services for the designated populations. Feedback from
stakeholders is necessary to confirm the program is operating to the highest quality and standards
(Astramovich & Coker, 2007). The program conducted serves adult military personnel who are
diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The program implements Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy (CBT) through a twelve–week program consisting of twenty–four, sixty minute
sessions. The stakeholders include military personnel and their family, veterans and their family, The
U.S. Department of Veterans Affair, and the U.S. Government. The program will be dissected in
order to identify the goals, data and instrumentation, data analysis, and dissemination of the program
evaluation.
Goals of the Program Evaluation The first goal of the CBT program is to identify methods for
implementing CBT on to military bases to support military personnel who have been diagnosed with
PTSD. The first data point supports the goal through a qualitative focus group with the deliverance
of a psychoeducation on PTSD to military personnel and their families. A second data point to
support the program is the use of quantitative structured interviews with military personnel and
family members about their experience

Methods Of Program Evaluation. Evaluation Research Is Offered
Methods of Program Evaluation Evaluation research is offered referred to as program evaluation,
which indicates a research purpose, not a specific research method (Maxfield, 2015, p. 280). The
evaluation research purpose is to evaluate the effects of policies, for instance, new sentencing laws.
There are many types of evaluation research, such as problem analysis, evidence–based policy, and
evidence generation. The purpose of this paper is to show the important of evaluation research
through an evaluation research publication.
Publication Bias in Medical Informatics Evaluation Research
The article is called "Publication Bias in Medical Informatics Evaluation Research: Is it an issue or
not?," written by Christof Machan, Elske Ammenwerth, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This will find if there is a big influence of publication bias and to give comparable statistics to this
question a random sample of eighty–six references were taking from a database. The database was
based on explanative and evaluation approach, which was more quantitative. While the second
question was about the statistical assessment of publication bias that asked to what extent is a
statistical assessment of publication bias for evaluation studies in health informatics possible
(Machan, 2006). This question allows for a scatter plot classifying every single study by effect size
and study quality. In order to achieve the researchers had to find a certain number of studies
evaluating the systems, measuring the same effect and providing quantitative data for effect size and
study quality. The evaluation research done for this question was physician order entry system, drug
prescription system, and more quantitative. Whereas the third question was quality of reviews and
meta–analyses that asked are there more systematic and narrative reviews or more meta–analyses
referenced in the database and do most of them draw positive, neutral or negative conclusion
(Machan, 2006). Also, asked if there is an issue of publication bias being dealt with by the

Evaluation Of A Student Program Evaluation Reports And...
The assignment is for the student to search program evaluation reports and complete the criteria that
were provided by the instructor, such as identify the evaluation it illustrates, and identify the
methodological strengths, and weaknesses. The article, "D.C. Department of Mental Health School
Mental Health Program SY 07–08 Report", discussed the limitations and barriers of learning
opportunities provided to many helping professionals within the school districts, youths, and the
parents. This program offers services that are individualized to the schools and provide adequate
services that are evidence–based treatments. This program was implemented in multiple school
districts to help the students and make the schools a safer environment. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, the article evaluate the effectiveness of the evidenced–based services that was provided
to the students. The outcome of the services that were most utilized are Good Touch Bad Touch,
Connect With Kids, and Botvin's Lifeskills were the most effective programs for the students. The
Satisfaction Surveys were distributed among children and youth receiving services; however, there
were limitations that affected the results. Also, the parents, teachers, and school staff completed the
satisfaction survey to obtain their viewpoint on their satisfaction of the clinicians. The children,
youths, and the parents filled out the survey on their positive experiences that they had with the
clinician. The teacher and staff filled out their satisfaction survey that pertained to the effectiveness
of the clinician when working with the students at the end of the year. At the end of the year, the
surveys were distributed to the school administrators to be completed and returned to the School
Mental Health Program. In addition, there were assessments that the principal had to rate their
perceptions on the school atmosphere. Also, the School Mental Health Program clinicians provided
workshops that were affiliated with the school. At the workshops, the clinicians distributed
satisfaction forms that were provided to the respondents and collected by the clinicians. First,
evaluation illustrates is the satisfaction of the participants that received

Essay On Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation The Educational Leadership and Policy Studies program at the University of
Texas at Arlington has helped me to grow both personally and professionally. The top three take–
aways from this program that I feel can be utilized in any career path include the knowledge I
gained on how to conduct and present action research, the writing skillset I developed which aided
me in becoming a better writer, and the training I received on how to be an effective leader. At the
beginning of this program I expected to learn how to be a principal. However, during the process I
realized I learned much more. For example, I learned how to lead using content knowledge and
interpersonal skills in order to create lasting and effective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
These chats should include a moderator who is a current and experienced administrator within a
school district. Online chats would be an excellent way to make connections and/or friendships with
people who will be impacting the future of education. Lastly, I believe that students would benefit
from conducting an action research project in a group versus completing a project alone. During our
program we learned about allowing for different formats during assessment or classroom activities.
Therefore, I believe that some students may have preferred working with a group on such a
significant project. The fact that students would be allowed to work with people from different
backgrounds and with different personality types to complete a project would equate with real world
experience. The opportunity to work with people is why the practicum is such a valuable experience.
However, one cannot carefully evaluate the practicum for this program without a brief discussion
about mentors. The mentor I chose for this program was approachable and generous with her time
and knowledge. I felt comfortable enough to ask questions or admit mistakes in order to learn. At
the onset of the practicum my mentor was just my boss. At the end of the practicum I esteemed her
as a colleague and friend. I believe that I was able to experience so much during the

Essay about Program Evaluation and Its Usefulness
Program Evaluation
Jackie Woodard
Evaluation Methodology– HCS/549
December 6, 2010
Amer Kaissi
Program Evaluation Program evaluation is a tool used for evaluating and assessing a program in
place. This paper will describe program evaluation and how it can be useful for an organization
wishing to determine the efficiency, effectiveness, and the impact of a program. Five of the most
common program evaluation models will be introduced. A number of different models are used by
those who evaluate programs. This paper will describe, in detail, the success case method for
evaluations.
Program Evaluation and Its Usefulness Program evaluation is a process of assessing whether a
program is efficient, effective, and has an impact on its ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Five Most Common Types of Program Evaluation Models The five most common types of program
evaluations are ones that assess the program's efficiency, assess the program's design and theory,
assess the program's impact on the community or end user, assess the program's process or
implementation, and assess the need for the program.
Success Case Model for Evaluation According to Brinkerhoff (1983), success case evaluation seeks
qualitative information about a few subjects rather than seeking thinner, quantifiable data about
many subjects. The success case model derives information from those participants who have
benefited from the program according to the goals and objectives the program intends to have. This
feedback may be helpful to others who have not benefitted as well from the program. "Success cases
may be studies briefly through short interviews with a few trainees or through more elaborate
approaches, such as work–sample analysis, records analysis and observation" (Brinkerhoff, 1983,
para. 9). Some uses of the success case method are illustrating that the program has a positive
impact, modifying and strengthening the program being evaluated, and building data collection
methods to determine the extent of

Evaluation Of A Student Program
School Committees, RTI Members of the IEP team are, the school psychologist, school counselor,
assistant principal of special education, speech therapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist
and social workers. Members of the PPT are the same members of the IEP including the RTI
coordinator. The PPT uses an individual case conference to determine if the needs of that individual
student have suggestions for school wide interventions or programs. If the student is having
problems academically or behaviorally, the PPT closely examines that student's case to see if the
school can change to better this student. As described by the school psychologist, RTI is a three–tier
program that mainly focuses on prevention. The school concentrate on prevention by ensuring the
school is using appropriate and evidence based methods to work with all students. RTI assist the
school in determining which students need individual intervention and services and makes the PPT
/IEP team aware of areas where there are school wide issues that need to be addressed. The PPT
team determines what tier the student should be categorized in by using observational notes and
academic data. Tier 1 is standards aligned instructions for all students and is the benchmark. Tier 2
is supplemental interventions for students at some risk and is strategic. Tier 3 is supplemental
interventions for students at high risk and is intensive. The PPT performs according to the tier the
child falls into. The RTI plays a

Comprehensive School Counseling Program Evaluation Essay
In order to provide a comprehensive school counseling program (CSCP) that meets the unique needs
of Ocean Elementary School, the school counselor must understand the needs of the school.
Therefore, conducting a needs assessment can help a new school counselor to evaluate the CSCP in
order to plan, implement, and improve the effectiveness of the program (Astramovich & Coker,
2007). Additionally, utilizing the accountability bridge counseling program evaluation model, a
continuous evaluation cycle helps to improve services based on stakeholder feedback, the needs of
those served, and outcomes (Astramovich & Coker, 2007). Within this model, a needs assessment
must be conducted in order to plan and develop services that address the needs of the students
(Astramovich & Coker, 2007). Thus, by utilizing assessment questionnaires, the school counselor
can gather information from the diverse population of students, parents, teachers, and administrator
to determine how the CSCP can best support all students' needs (American School Counselor
Association [ASCA], 2012). Additionally, the use of other data, such as observations, standardized
test scores, absentee rates, and student referrals can support the feedback received on the
questionnaires. Based on the data, the school counselor can evaluate the school counseling program
in order to improve the program in the domain areas of academic, social/emotional, and career
development. Thus, within the accountability bridge counseling

Medication-Assisted Treatment Program Evaluation. Perreault
Medication–Assisted Treatment Program Evaluation Perreault et al. (2010) noted a direct link with
clients' satisfaction with their treatment providers and substantial clinical improvements. Within the
medication–assisted treatment (MAT) framework, clinical improvements are vital to patients' well–
being and overall quality of life improvements. Additionally, positive and successful outcomes are
fundamental for continued funding via stakeholders, such as single–county authorities and medical
insurers. This paper will first address the purpose of program evaluations. It will then examine how
to evaluate the MAT treatment model, while identifying one primary goal for the MAT program
evaluation. Lastly, an explanation of how data will be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Houser (2015) outlined the importance of program evaluation research in giving stakeholders clear
and concise data regarding treatment efficacy to justify continued authorizations. Furthermore, MAT
programs are funded in part or wholly by governmental agencies, which would also be interested in
the evaluation findings of the research. If the results were bad, their funding my switch to another
provider, leaving a population without services.
Program to be Evaluated As previously discussed, the program the author would choose to evaluate
is MAT treatment programs. This population consists of individuals that have been diagnosed with
opiate use disorder, and receive opiate–substitution medications, such as Methadone or Suboxone.
These program evaluations would be consumer–centered, performed in the clinics they receive
services. Interested stakeholders would include the treatment center where the participants receive
services, as well as other MAT service providers. Additionally, the funding sources for these
individuals and program centers, such as county, state, and federal agencies, along with medical
insurers, would also gain value from the program evaluation research. The evaluation would consist
of the client's experiences and progress during the course of their MAT treatment. MAT is typically
designed to be a long–term treatment for opiate use disorder, so

Program Planning and Evaluation Paper
Assignment: Program Planning and Evaluation Paper
Janice Minnis
HSM/270: Programming Planning and Grant Proposal Writing in Human Services
August 21, 2011
Terri Galindo
Axia College of University of Phoenix
I have chosen to work with Program Scenario Three, PEACE Domestic Violence Agency.
Yuen/Terao (2003) states, "Program planning is an organized process through which a set of
coordinated activities or interventions is developed to address and facilitate change in some or all of
the identified problems." "Program Evaluation is the application of different social research designs
in assessing the needs and results of programs." In short, Program Planning and Program Evaluation
is the process of assessing needs, organizing an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The plan has added another targeted population and other agencies that will be used for particular
services. The plan will outline how the relationship between this agency and other services providers
would function, and the evaluation would outline whether or not the agencies meet the guidelines set
forth by this agency and governmental guidelines. The objective that will provide young people who
are or have been involved with the criminal justice system with a rehabilitation program targets
another population. The plan must define the targeted age group or groups; the plan must define the
sources targeted to work as a part of the rehabilitation program. The evaluation will determine
through research, exploratory study and descriptive research, the most effective agencies and
strategies to use for the success of this type of program. The grant programs for the funding of the
agency needs a plan that will outline securing other funding that will meet the day–to–day
operations of the program. Staffing, materials needed, and other fundamentals to run a program must
be taken into consideration. The budgeted amount to run the agency can be determined by the
evaluation of all that is a part of the objective and this will determine if the criteria has been met for
the grants applied for. The Investor Program has a maximum number of organizations it will fund
and is based upon the objectives

According to Mertens and Wilson, program evaluation is a systematic method for collecting,
analyzing, and using information to answer questions about projects, policies and programs,
particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency. Stakeholders often want to know whether the
programs they are funding and supporting are effective. While program evaluation first focuses on
the effectiveness of the program, other important factors to take into consideration is cost of the
program, improvements that could be made, outcomes of the program, and usefulness of the
program. Evaluators help to answer these questions, and stakeholders have to work with the
evaluators in order to come to the best conclusion about the effectiveness of a program so that all
aspects are taken into consideration. Program evaluations can involve both quantitative and
qualitative methods of research. People who do program evaluation come from many different
backgrounds, such as sociology, psychology, economics, social work, and public policy. Some
graduate schools also have specific training programs for program evaluation. Rossi, Lipsey and
Freeman suggest the following kinds of assessment, which may be appropriate at these different
stages: assessment of the need for the program, assessment of program design and logic/theory,
assessment of how the program is being implemented, assessment of the program 's outcome or
impact, assessment of the program 's cost and efficiency, and assessing needs.

Program Evaluation And Measurement Tools
Program Evaluation and Measurement tools Hypertension (HTN) is a chronic illness that serves as a
main risk factor for cardiovascular disease (Hanus, Simoes, Amboni, Ceretta, & Tuon, 2015).
Although medication can manage HTN appropriately, lifestyle modifications make a substantial
difference as well. However, many patients go through behavior stages in which he or she
contemplate on making the necessary changes to improve their health. One solution to the problem
is the development of an educational Hypertension Intervention and Follow–Up program (HIFP).
Studies have shown that active educational interventions that incorporate small groups are more
effective than passive delivery of educational materials (Pimenta, Caldiera, & Mamede, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Utilizing the CDC's framework for evaluation will allow the program design to be tailored for
implementation. Efficacy is defined as the ability to produce the desired result ("Efficacy," n.d.).
One way to establish efficacy is to test the knowledge of the health care providers. The blood
pressure program will be ineffective if the providers lack HTN knowledge. The author will plan to
evaluate fluctuations in employee knowledge, attitudes, and viewpoints about blood pressure
screening and control. Furthermore, the health care team members need to understand how to
measure a manual blood pressure adequately. Accurate blood pressure readings will facilitate more
validity in the results (CDC, 2014). Efficiency distinctly represents the ability to accomplish tasks in
the least amount of time and effort ("Efficiency," n.d.). Measurement tools used for determining
efficiency will be proper staffing, working equipment, various sizes of blood pressure cuffs, and
acceptable space for the program. Quality is the characteristic or feature that something possesses
("Quality," n.d.). Trained health care providers will aid the program in obtaining good quality. Also,
new sphygmomanometer that are calibrated and education pamphlets will serve as increasing the
quality of the program. Intervention Plan Outcomes Short–term outcomes The short–term goals of

Program Evaluation
The program evaluation will use a mixed method–approach drawing data from both quantitative and
qualitative data sources. The data will be gathered and determined that it is valid, accurate and
reliable. Upon summarization of the data a list of recommendations will be developed based on the
results obtained. These recommendations will be valid and justifiable in order to alter or continue
the program. These recommendation will be efficient, practical and capable of being implemented.
To analyze the population that is receiving services and provide information that describes the
program, a quantitative analysis will be used. This will help when discussing the program with
stakeholders and potential future funders such as the Robert Wood Johnson ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
These factors include ethnicity, poverty, and immigration status. The evaluation will be analyzed to
better deliver the services to the target population of uninsured and underinsured children. The
comparing of different groups will be done through contingency tables. The qualitative analysis
such as the interviews, surveys and data will gather themes that are present in all of the information.
The qualitative data source will serve a purpose for program accountability, monitoring and
improvement. The participant surveys, staff interviews, and funder's focus group will provide
information on whether the program is operating as expected, how the program is operating and
which part of the program is more or less successful. This evaluation will be utilized by many of the
stakeholders. The program manager and the staff of Department of Health and Social Services will
use the findings to refine program strategies. The findings will help guide the program to focus on
areas that are most crucial for effective service delivery. The clinical staff of all the public schools
will use the findings to steer the children's families to obtain health care coverage and connect them
with the program. Robert Wood Johnson foundation will use the findings to determine the future
funding distribution for the program. The superintendent of Stamford Public Schools will use the
findings in advocacy efforts.

Pre-Program Evaluation Essay

More Related Content

Similar to Pre-Program Evaluation Essay

More from Katie Parker

Recently uploaded

Pre-Program Evaluation Essay