New Directions: leadership in
inclusive schools (with a focus
on literacy)
Portage	Administra/on	
June	2,	2017	
Faye	Brownlie	
www.slideshare.net/
fayebrownlie.portage.admin.June2017
Learning Intentions
•  I	have	a	beDer	understanding	of	the	possibili/es	
and	prac/ces	of	being	a	leader	of	literacy	learning	
•  I	have	a	beDer	understanding	of	the	power	–	and	
how	to	support	–	assessment	for	learning	
prac/ces	
•  I	have	a	structure	for	implemen/ng	class	reviews	
in	my	school	
•  I	have	a	beDer	understanding	of	research-based	
effec/ve	literacy	prac/ces		
•  I	have	a	plan	to	support	inclusion	of	all	students	
and	collabora/on	among	staff	in	my	school
Read, Write, Lead - Routman
•  Something	that	struck	you	that	is	changing	
your	prac/ce
Reading is understanding.
Reading is thinking in the
disciplines.
Leadership Roles
-keeping	the	vision	alive	
-providing	structures	and	supports	to	enable	
others	to	provide	rich	learning	environments	
-maintaining	a	strengths-based	perspec/ve	
-learning	together	about	evidence-based	
reading	prac/ces	
-encouraging	collabora/on
Structures and Supports
•  The	vision	
•  Class	reviews	
•  Collabora/on	/me	
•  A	focus	on	co-teaching	
•  Walking	the	talk	
	-What’s	working?	
	-What	do	we	need	to	polish?	
	-Where	do	your	most	at	promise	students	spend	
most	of	their	/me?		On	what?	
	-Do	we	plan	with	ALL	students	in	mind?
McKinsey Report, 2007
•  The	top-performing	school	systems	recognize	
that	the	only	way	to	improve	outcomes	is	to	
improve	instruc/on:		learning	occurs	when	
students	and	teachers	interact,	and	thus	to	
improve	learning	implies	improving	the	quality	
of	that	interac/on.
How the world’s most improved
school systems keep getting better
–McKinsey, 2010
Three	changes	collabora/ve	prac/ce	brought	about:	
1.  Teachers	moved	from	being	private	emperors	to	
making	their	prac/ce	public	and	the	en/re	teaching	
popula/on	sharing	responsibility	for	student	learning.	
2.  Focus	shiVed	from	what	teachers	teach	to	what	
students	learn.	
3.  Systems	developed	a	model	of	‘good	instruc/on’	and	
teachers	became	custodians	of	the	model.	(p.	79-81)
Good to Great Systems
•  Focus	on	the	professionalism	of	teachers	
•  The	values	and	behaviors	of	the	educators	
propel	the	system	forward	(not	centrally	
controlled)	
•  Develop	common	language	about	the	craV	of	
teaching	
•  Teacher	and	administrator	coaches
Great to Excellent Systems
•  Learning	communi/es:		peer-led	support	and	
accountability	
•  Focus	on	student	learning		
•  Move	to	school	and	teacher	self-evalua/on,	away	
from	standardized	tests	
•  Open	up	classroom	prac/ce	–	de-priva/ze	
•  Ac/on	research	
•  Collabora/ve	prac/ce	among	educators	
•  Encourage	innova/on	in	teaching
A Street Corner Scene
•  How	is	this	street	crossing	a	metaphor		
– for	inclusion?	
– for	a	strengths-based	approach?
Inclusion
Inclusion
•  Shared	goals	
•  Everyone	is	included,	expects	to	succeed,	and	
belongs	
•  Mul/ple	pathways	
•  Different	rates	
•  Various	levels	of	support
•  Move	from	CONFUSION	and	FEAR		to	
POSSIBLITIES	and	POSITIVE	EXPECTATIONS.	
•  Inclusion	requires	TRUST	and	
COLLABORATION.		You	can’t	do	it	alone!
•  Inclusion	is	not	a	special	educa/on	ini/a/ve,	
rather	it	belongs	to	general	educa/on	and	is	a	
reflec/on	of	the	society	we	want.
The Vision
A	Remedial	Model	
(Deficit	Model)	
‘Fixing’	the	student	
Outside	the	classroom/	
curriculum	
A	ShiV	from….. 	 	 	 	to	
An	Inclusive	Model	
(Strengths	Based)	
‘Fixing’	the	curriculum	
Within	the	classroom/	
curriculum	
to
Transforma)ons	within	the		
Inclusive	Model	
Pull-out	Support	/	Physical	Inclusion	
•	s/ll	a	remedial	model	–	to	make	kids	fit	
•	In	the	class,	but	oVen	on	a	different	plan	
Inclusion	
•	Classroom	Teacher	as	central	support	
•	Resource	Teacher	–	working	together	in	a	
	co-teaching	model
Goal	
to	support	students	in	working	
effec/vely	in	the	classroom	
environment
Goal	
to	work	together	to	beDer	meet	
the	needs	of	all	students
Rationale	
By	sharing	our	collec/ve	
knowledge	about	our	classes	of	
students	and	developing	a	plan	of	
ac/on	based	on	this,	we	can	
beDer	meet	the	needs	of	all	
students.
A Key Belief
Interven/on	is	focused	on	classroom	support.		
Classroom-based	interven/on	does	NOT	mean	
that	all	specialists	have	to	be	in	the	classroom	
all	the	/me.		Instead,	the	RESULTS	of	their	
work	have	to	show	up	in	the	classroom.
“You	can	see	what	the	
teachers,	teams,	and	
schools	value	by	what	
actually	goes	on	in	the	
classrooms.”		
(Brownlie,	Fullerton,	Schnellert,	
2011,	p25)	
“Pedagogy	trumps	curriculum.”		
	(Dylan	Wiliam)
No plan, No point
The Class Review Process
Class Review
•  Strengths-based	approach	
•  Collabora/ve	
•  The	classroom	teacher	is	the	heart	of	the	
process	
•  Goal:	support	a	community	of	learners	
•  Goal:		create	a	plan
•  Meet	as	a	school-based	team,	with	the	
administrator	
•  Each	classroom	teacher	(CT)	joins	the	team	
for	45	minutes	to	speak	of	her	class	
•  TOC’s	provide	coverage	for	CTs	
•  Follow	the	order	of	strengths,	needs,	goals,	
individuals	
•  The	CT	does	not	do	the	recording	or	the	
chairing
The	Class	Review	
What	are	the	strengths		
of	the	class?	
What	are	your	concerns		
about	the	class	as	a	whole?	
What	are	your	main	goals		
for	the	class	this	year?	
What	are	the	individual		
needs	in	your	class?
Class Review
Learning in Safe Schools, 2nd ed
(Brownlie & King, 2011)	
Teacher:
Class:
Classroom Strengths Classroom Needs
Other
Socio-EmotionalLearningLanguageMedical
Goals Decisions
Individual Concerns
Class Review Recording Form
1. Learning Intentions
“Students	can	reach	any	target	as	long		
		as	it	holds	s/ll	for	them.”		-	S/ggins	-	
2. Criteria
	Work	with	learners	to	develop	criteria	so	they	know	what	quality	looks	
like.	
3. Questions
	Increase	quality	ques/ons	to		
		show	evidence	of	learning	
Whose	ques/ons?		Who	answers?
4.	Descrip)ve	Feedback	
Timely,	relevant,	personal,		descrip/ve	
feedback	contributes	most		
powerfully	to	student	learning!	
5. Self & Peer Assessment
Involve	learners	more	in	self	&	peer	assessment
6. Ownership
Have	students	understand	their		
learning	and		
Communicate	It	with	others
Do your students receive
individual feedback from you in
every class?
Effect Size – What makes a difference?
John Hattie in Visible Learning (> .4 effect size)
•  Student	self-assessment/self-grading	
•  Response	to	interven/on	
•  Teacher	credibility	
•  Providing	forma/ve	assessments	
•  Classroom	discussion	
•  Teacher	clarity	
•  Feedback	
•  Reciprocal	teaching	
•  Teacher-student	rela/onships	fostered	
•  Spaced	vs.	mass	prac/ce
Effect Size – What makes a difference?
John Hattie in Visible Learning (> .4 effect size)
•  Student	self-assessment/self-grading	
•  Response	to	interven/on	
•  Teacher	credibility	
•  Providing	forma/ve	assessments	
•  Classroom	discussion	–	(ques/oning,	ownership)	
•  Teacher	clarity	–	(learning	inten/ons/criteria)	
•  Feedback	
•  Reciprocal	teaching	
•  Teacher-student	rela/onships	fostered	
•  Spaced	vs.	mass	prac/ce
“The	most	powerful	single	influence	enhancing	
achievement	is	feedback”-Dylan	Wiliam	
•  Quality	feedback	is	needed,	not	just	more	feedback	
•  Students	with	a	Growth	Mindset	welcome	feedback	
and	are	more	likely	to	use	it	to	improve	their	
performance	
•  Oral	feedback	is	much	more	effec/ve	than	wriDen	
•  The	most	powerful	feedback	is	provided	from	the	
student	to	the	teacher
The Pedagogy
“Students	taught	by	teachers	who	used	
assessment	for	learning	achieved	in	six	or	
seven	months	what	would	otherwise	have	
taken	a	year.”		
-Black	&	Wiliam	(1998).		
“Feedback	[is]	in	the	top	ten	influences	on	
achievement.	Where	is	the	student	going?	
How	is	the	student	going?	Where	to	next?”	
-HaLe	(2012).
“Every	Child,	Every	Day”	–	Richard	Allington	and	
Rachael	Gabriel	
In	Educa/onal	Leadership,	March	2012	
6	elements	of	instruc/on	for	ALL	students!
1.  Every	child	reads	something	he	or	she	chooses.	
2.  Every	child	reads	accurately.	
3.  Every	child	reads	something	he	or	she	
understands.	
4.  Every	child	writes	about	something	personally	
meaningful.	
5.  Every	child	talks	with	peers	about	reading	and	
wri/ng.	
6.  Every	child	listens	to	a	fluent	adult	read	aloud.
Frameworks
It’s All about Thinking (English, Humanities, Social Studies) –
Brownlie & Schnellert, 2009
It’s All about Thinking (Math, Science)– Brownlie, Fullerton,
Schnellert, 2011
Universal Design for Learning
Mul/ple	means:	
-to	tap	into	background	knowledge,	to	ac/vate	
prior	knowledge,	to	increase	engagement	and	
mo/va/on	
-to	acquire	the	informa/on	and	knowledge	to	
process	new	ideas	and	informa/on	
-to	express	what	they	know.	
		 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Rose	&	Meyer,	2002
Backwards Design
•  What	important	ideas	and	enduring	
understandings	do	you	want	the	students	to	
know?	
•  What	thinking	strategies	will	students	need	to	
demonstrate	these	understandings?		
		 	 	 	 	 	 	 	McTighe	&	Wiggins,	2001
•  Reading Next: A Vision for Action and
Research in Middle and High School
Literacy – Biancarosa & Snow, 2004
•  Infrastructural improvements
•  Extended	/me	for	literacy	
•  Professional	development	
•  Ongoing	forma/ve	and	summa/ve	assessment	
of	student	learning	and	programs	
•  Teacher	teams	
•  Leadership	
•  A	comprehensive	and	coordinated	literacy	
program
15-3=0	
•  What	are	the	3?
47	
15-3=0	
Without -
•  professional development
•  ongoing formative assessment of
students and
•  ongoing summative assessment of
students and programs
Reading Next - Biancarosa & Snow, 2004
Resources
•  Assessment	&	Instruc3on	of	ESL	Learners	–	Brownlie,	Feniak,	
&	McCarthy,	2004	
•  Grand	Conversa3ons,	ThoughAul	Responses	–	a	unique	
approach	to	literature	circles	–	Brownlie,	2005	
•  Student	Diversity,3rd	ed.	–	Brownlie,	Feniak	&	Schnellert,	2016	
•  Reading	and	Responding,	gr.	4,5,&6	–	Brownlie	&	Jeroski,	
2006	
•  It’s	All	about	Thinking	–	collabora3ng	to	support	all	learners	
(in	English,	Social	Studies	and	Humani3es)	–	Brownlie	&	
Schnellert,	2009	
•  It’s	All	about	Thinking	–	collabora3ng	to	support	all	learners	
(in	Math	and	Science)	-	Brownlie,	Fullerton	&	Schnellert,	2011	
•  Learning	in	Safe	Schools,	2nd	ed	–	Brownlie	&	King,	Oct.,	2011
Portage.admin.June2017
Portage.admin.June2017
Portage.admin.June2017

Portage.admin.June2017