Phage Therapy
Presented by: Usman Shareef
CMS #: 14539
Presented to: Dr. Umair Ilyas
Contents
• Phages-An Introduction
• Phage structure
• Fates of phages
• Antibiotic resistance-growing problem
• Phage therapy
• History
• Why phage therapy??
• Initial problems
• Solutions
• Prerequisites for phage therapy
• Administration and examples
• Future implications
• Advantages and disadvantages
• Challenges
• Conclusions
Bacteriophage (Phage)
• Definition - Obligate intracellular parasites that multiply inside bacteria by making use
of some or all of the host biosynthetic machinery.
• Significance
– Phage therapy
– Gene transfer in bacteria
– Phage display
– Medical applications
• Identification of bacteria - phage typing
• Treatment and prophylaxsis???
Structure of bacteriophage
• A bacteriophage particle consists of a single stranded DNA or RNA molecule,
encapsulated inside a protein coat or lipoprotein coat.
• Tail morphologies: long , flexible tails, double layered, contractile tails.
• The size of phage head is correlated to the size of genome being packaged and varies in
diameter between 45 and 100nm.
Fates of bacteriophages
Time course of lytic infection cycle
Antibiotic resistance-growing
problem
• Main reason is the abusive use of antibiotics over past twenty years.
• The resistance phenomenon represents not only an important healthcare issue but also an
economic problem.
• Penicillin fails to completely eradicate Streptococci in 35% of the pateints.
• Infections caused by Streptomyces agalactiae in pregnant women cannot be treated with
antibiotics because of the risk of abortion.
Phage therapy
• Phage therapy is the therapeutic use of bacteriophages for the treatment of pathogenic
bacterial infections.
• This method of therapy is still being tested for treatment of a variety of bacterial
infections.
• Has not yet been approved in countries other than Georgia.
• Phage therapy has many potential applications in human medicines as well as dentistry ,
veterinary science and agriculture.
• Bacteriophages are much more specific (host specific) and have a high therapeutic
index.
History
 Edward Twort (1915) and Felix d'Herelle (1917) independently reported isolating
filterable entities capable of destroying bacterial cultures and of producing small cleared
areas on bacterial lawns.
 It was F d'Herelle, a Canadian working at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, who gave them
the name "bacteriophages"-- using the suffix phage (1922).
Frederick Twort
1915 Félix d'Hérelle 1917
WHY PHAGE THERAPY???
Bacteriophages Antibiotics Comments
Very specific (i.e., usually affect only the targeted
bacterial species); therefore, chances of
developing secondary infections are avoided
Antibiotics target both pathogenic microorganisms
and normal microflora. This affects the microbial
balance in the patient, which may lead to serious
secondary infections.
High specificity may be considered to be a
disadvantage of phages because the disease-
causing bacterium must be identified before phage
therapy can be successfully initiated. Antibiotics
have a higher probability of being effective than
phages when the identity of the etiologic agent has
not been determined.
Replicate at the site of infection and are thus
available where they are most needed
They are metabolized and eliminated from the
body and do not necessarily concentrate at the site
of infection.
The "exponential growth" of phages at the site of
infection may require less frequent phage
administration in order to achieve the optimal
therapeutic effect.
No serious side effects have been described. Multiple side effects, including intestinal
disorders, allergies, and secondary infections (e.g.,
yeast infections) have been reported
A few minor side effects reported for therapeutic
phages may have been due to the liberation of
endotoxins from bacteria lysed in vivo by the
phages. Such effects also may be observed when
antibiotics are used
Phage-resistant bacteria remain susceptible to
other phages having a similar target range.
Resistance to antibiotics is not limited to targeted
bacteria.
Because of their more broad-spectrum activity,
antibiotics select for many resistant bacterial
species, not just for resistant mutants of the
targeted bacteria
Selecting new phages (e.g., against phage-resistant
bacteria) is a relatively rapid process that can
frequently be accomplished in days or weeks.
Developing a new antibiotic (e.g., against
antibiotic-resistant bacteria) is a time-consuming
process and may take several years
Evolutionary arguments support the idea that
active phages can be selected against every
antibiotic-resistant or phage-resistant bacterium
by the ever-ongoing process of natural selection.
Initial problems
• Problem # 1: Specific host range
• Problem # 2: Bacterial debris present in phage preparations.
• Problem # 3: Attempts to remove host bacteria from therapeutic preparations
• Problem # 4: Rapid clearance of phages
• Problem # 5: Lysogeny
• Problem # 6: Lack of knowledge
WHAT CAN BE THE
SOLUTIONS????
Solutions
• Use of phage mixtures (cocktails)
• Application in chronic infections: time to select appropriate phages
• Broad spectrum phages (e.g. all S. aureus) exist.
• Add phages to antibiotics
• Study of genome of phage
Prerequisites for phage therapy
Various prerequisites that should be met:
1. Phage therapy should not be attempted before the biology of the therapeutic phage is
well understood.
2. Phage preparations should meet all safety requirements.
3. Phage preparations should contain infective phage particles.
4. The phage receptor should be known.
5. The efficacy of phage should be tested in an animal model.
Culture-commercial preparations
• D’Herelle’s commercial laboratory in Paris produced at least 5 different phage
preparation against various bacterial infection.
• The preparations were called as:
• Bacte-coli-phage
• Bacte-rhino-phage
• Bacte-intesti-phage
• Bacte-pyo-phage
• Bacte-staphy-phage.
• Therapeutic phages were also produced in United States.
• In the 1940’s Eli Lilly Company produced seven phage products for human use.
Administration
• Orally
• Topically on infected wounds
• Application in liquid form is possible and stored preferably in refrigerated vials
• Injections are rarely used
Examples
• Killing of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a
Mycobacteriophage delivered by a non virulent Mycobacterium
• Tuberculosis is a serious health problem that results in millions of deaths around the
world each year
• Mycobacterium smegmatis , an avirulent mycobacterium is used to deliver the lytic
phage TM4 where both M.avium and M.tuberculosis reside within macrophages
• These results showed that treatment of M.avium infected as well as M.tuberculosis
infected with M.smegmatis infected with TM4 resulted in significant reduction in
number of viable intracellular bacillli.
Example # 2
• Killing of S.aureus by using bacteriophage that kills S.aureus .
• By treating the infection with the use of phage impregnated pad
• Successful results were reported
S.aureus infection
Treated with phage
impregnated pad
Improvement in wound
healing
Future implications
• As a vaccine delivery vehicle
• Prophylaxsis???
• Phage display
• Phage typing
• Genetically manipulated lysogenic phages for in situ gene delivery:
--> in situ delivery to bacterial cells of
* killing genes (doc)
* antisense RNA to block translation
Westwater et al. 2003. Use of a genetically engineered phage to deliver antimicrobial agents
to bacteria: an alternative therapy for treatment of bacterial infections.
Phages as bio-control and bacteriophage bioprocessing
As vaccine delivery vehicle
• The stability of whole bacteriophage lambda particles, used as a DNA vaccine delivery
system has been examined.
• When phage lambda was diluted into water, a marginal loss in titre was observed over a
2-week period.
• Over a 24 h period, liquid phage suspensions were stable within the pH range pH 3-11,
therefore oral administration of bacteriophage DNA vaccines via drinking water may be
possible.
Phage typing
• Phage typing is also known as the use of sensitivity patterns to specific phages for
precisely identifying microbial strains.
• The sensitivity of detection would be increased if the phages bound to bacteria are
detected by specific antibodies
• The technique has most extensively been used for the detection of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis , E.coli , Pseudomonas , Salmonella , Listeria and Campylobacter species
Advantages and disadvantages
Advantages
• Phages are very specific and do not
harm the useful bacteria that live in and
in the body
• They replicate at the site of infection
• They are active against antibiotic
resistant bacteria
• Once administered it will not need more
dosages
Disadvantages
• The great specificity is also a
disadvantage when the exact species of
bacteria is unknown and also in case of
multiple infections
• Infections whose agents are hidden in
the interior of the cells may be
inaccessible to phages
Cont’d
Advantages
• High expectations of safety
• Can carry accessory genes for additional
therapeutic benefits
Disadvantages
• Resistance can arise (may use
cocktails)
• Immune response of host may limit
or prevent the re-use
• The development of phage–
neutralizing antibodies-The
production of neutralizing
antibodies should not be a significant
obstacle during initial or relatively
short-term therapeutic treatments at
least.
Challenges
• Specificity of phages
• Novelty
• Efficacy and other technical challenges
• Regulatory approvals
• Market acceptance
• Patient safety
Conclusions
• Multidrug resistance bacteria have opened a second window for phage therapy
• Modern innovations combined with careful scientific methodology can enhance
mankind’s ability to make it work this time around
• Phage therapy can then serve as a stand alone therapy for infections that are fully
resistant
• It will then be serve as a co-therapeutic agent for infections that are still susceptible to
antibiotics by helping to prevent the emergence of bacterial mutants against either agent
References
• Hugos and Russel’s Microbiology
• Carlton R M (1999) Phage therapy: Past history and Future prospects
• Broxmeyer et al. 2002. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1155-1160.
• (Dabrowska et al. 2005. Bacteriophage penetration in vertebrates. J. Appl.
Microbiol. 98: 7-13.)
• Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1301-1307.
• Nature Reviews/Drug Discovery 2: 489-497.
• www.phagetherapycenter.com/ - Phage Therapy Center of Tbilsi, Georgia.
“…effective treatment solution for patients who have bacterial infections that do
not respond to conventional antibiotics”
• http://www.researchgate.net/publication/8514842_Bacteriophage_lambda_is_a_h
ighly_stable_DNA_vaccine_delivery_vehicle

Phage Therapy.pptx

  • 1.
    Phage Therapy Presented by:Usman Shareef CMS #: 14539 Presented to: Dr. Umair Ilyas
  • 2.
    Contents • Phages-An Introduction •Phage structure • Fates of phages • Antibiotic resistance-growing problem • Phage therapy • History • Why phage therapy?? • Initial problems • Solutions • Prerequisites for phage therapy • Administration and examples • Future implications • Advantages and disadvantages • Challenges • Conclusions
  • 3.
    Bacteriophage (Phage) • Definition- Obligate intracellular parasites that multiply inside bacteria by making use of some or all of the host biosynthetic machinery. • Significance – Phage therapy – Gene transfer in bacteria – Phage display – Medical applications • Identification of bacteria - phage typing • Treatment and prophylaxsis???
  • 4.
    Structure of bacteriophage •A bacteriophage particle consists of a single stranded DNA or RNA molecule, encapsulated inside a protein coat or lipoprotein coat. • Tail morphologies: long , flexible tails, double layered, contractile tails. • The size of phage head is correlated to the size of genome being packaged and varies in diameter between 45 and 100nm.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Time course oflytic infection cycle
  • 8.
    Antibiotic resistance-growing problem • Mainreason is the abusive use of antibiotics over past twenty years. • The resistance phenomenon represents not only an important healthcare issue but also an economic problem. • Penicillin fails to completely eradicate Streptococci in 35% of the pateints. • Infections caused by Streptomyces agalactiae in pregnant women cannot be treated with antibiotics because of the risk of abortion.
  • 9.
    Phage therapy • Phagetherapy is the therapeutic use of bacteriophages for the treatment of pathogenic bacterial infections. • This method of therapy is still being tested for treatment of a variety of bacterial infections. • Has not yet been approved in countries other than Georgia. • Phage therapy has many potential applications in human medicines as well as dentistry , veterinary science and agriculture. • Bacteriophages are much more specific (host specific) and have a high therapeutic index.
  • 10.
    History  Edward Twort(1915) and Felix d'Herelle (1917) independently reported isolating filterable entities capable of destroying bacterial cultures and of producing small cleared areas on bacterial lawns.  It was F d'Herelle, a Canadian working at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, who gave them the name "bacteriophages"-- using the suffix phage (1922). Frederick Twort 1915 Félix d'Hérelle 1917
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Bacteriophages Antibiotics Comments Veryspecific (i.e., usually affect only the targeted bacterial species); therefore, chances of developing secondary infections are avoided Antibiotics target both pathogenic microorganisms and normal microflora. This affects the microbial balance in the patient, which may lead to serious secondary infections. High specificity may be considered to be a disadvantage of phages because the disease- causing bacterium must be identified before phage therapy can be successfully initiated. Antibiotics have a higher probability of being effective than phages when the identity of the etiologic agent has not been determined. Replicate at the site of infection and are thus available where they are most needed They are metabolized and eliminated from the body and do not necessarily concentrate at the site of infection. The "exponential growth" of phages at the site of infection may require less frequent phage administration in order to achieve the optimal therapeutic effect. No serious side effects have been described. Multiple side effects, including intestinal disorders, allergies, and secondary infections (e.g., yeast infections) have been reported A few minor side effects reported for therapeutic phages may have been due to the liberation of endotoxins from bacteria lysed in vivo by the phages. Such effects also may be observed when antibiotics are used Phage-resistant bacteria remain susceptible to other phages having a similar target range. Resistance to antibiotics is not limited to targeted bacteria. Because of their more broad-spectrum activity, antibiotics select for many resistant bacterial species, not just for resistant mutants of the targeted bacteria Selecting new phages (e.g., against phage-resistant bacteria) is a relatively rapid process that can frequently be accomplished in days or weeks. Developing a new antibiotic (e.g., against antibiotic-resistant bacteria) is a time-consuming process and may take several years Evolutionary arguments support the idea that active phages can be selected against every antibiotic-resistant or phage-resistant bacterium by the ever-ongoing process of natural selection.
  • 14.
    Initial problems • Problem# 1: Specific host range • Problem # 2: Bacterial debris present in phage preparations. • Problem # 3: Attempts to remove host bacteria from therapeutic preparations • Problem # 4: Rapid clearance of phages • Problem # 5: Lysogeny • Problem # 6: Lack of knowledge
  • 15.
    WHAT CAN BETHE SOLUTIONS????
  • 16.
    Solutions • Use ofphage mixtures (cocktails) • Application in chronic infections: time to select appropriate phages • Broad spectrum phages (e.g. all S. aureus) exist. • Add phages to antibiotics • Study of genome of phage
  • 17.
    Prerequisites for phagetherapy Various prerequisites that should be met: 1. Phage therapy should not be attempted before the biology of the therapeutic phage is well understood. 2. Phage preparations should meet all safety requirements. 3. Phage preparations should contain infective phage particles. 4. The phage receptor should be known. 5. The efficacy of phage should be tested in an animal model.
  • 18.
    Culture-commercial preparations • D’Herelle’scommercial laboratory in Paris produced at least 5 different phage preparation against various bacterial infection. • The preparations were called as: • Bacte-coli-phage • Bacte-rhino-phage • Bacte-intesti-phage • Bacte-pyo-phage • Bacte-staphy-phage. • Therapeutic phages were also produced in United States. • In the 1940’s Eli Lilly Company produced seven phage products for human use.
  • 19.
    Administration • Orally • Topicallyon infected wounds • Application in liquid form is possible and stored preferably in refrigerated vials • Injections are rarely used
  • 20.
    Examples • Killing ofMycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a Mycobacteriophage delivered by a non virulent Mycobacterium • Tuberculosis is a serious health problem that results in millions of deaths around the world each year • Mycobacterium smegmatis , an avirulent mycobacterium is used to deliver the lytic phage TM4 where both M.avium and M.tuberculosis reside within macrophages • These results showed that treatment of M.avium infected as well as M.tuberculosis infected with M.smegmatis infected with TM4 resulted in significant reduction in number of viable intracellular bacillli.
  • 21.
    Example # 2 •Killing of S.aureus by using bacteriophage that kills S.aureus . • By treating the infection with the use of phage impregnated pad • Successful results were reported
  • 22.
    S.aureus infection Treated withphage impregnated pad Improvement in wound healing
  • 23.
    Future implications • Asa vaccine delivery vehicle • Prophylaxsis??? • Phage display • Phage typing • Genetically manipulated lysogenic phages for in situ gene delivery: --> in situ delivery to bacterial cells of * killing genes (doc) * antisense RNA to block translation Westwater et al. 2003. Use of a genetically engineered phage to deliver antimicrobial agents to bacteria: an alternative therapy for treatment of bacterial infections. Phages as bio-control and bacteriophage bioprocessing
  • 24.
    As vaccine deliveryvehicle • The stability of whole bacteriophage lambda particles, used as a DNA vaccine delivery system has been examined. • When phage lambda was diluted into water, a marginal loss in titre was observed over a 2-week period. • Over a 24 h period, liquid phage suspensions were stable within the pH range pH 3-11, therefore oral administration of bacteriophage DNA vaccines via drinking water may be possible.
  • 25.
    Phage typing • Phagetyping is also known as the use of sensitivity patterns to specific phages for precisely identifying microbial strains. • The sensitivity of detection would be increased if the phages bound to bacteria are detected by specific antibodies • The technique has most extensively been used for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , E.coli , Pseudomonas , Salmonella , Listeria and Campylobacter species
  • 26.
    Advantages and disadvantages Advantages •Phages are very specific and do not harm the useful bacteria that live in and in the body • They replicate at the site of infection • They are active against antibiotic resistant bacteria • Once administered it will not need more dosages Disadvantages • The great specificity is also a disadvantage when the exact species of bacteria is unknown and also in case of multiple infections • Infections whose agents are hidden in the interior of the cells may be inaccessible to phages
  • 27.
    Cont’d Advantages • High expectationsof safety • Can carry accessory genes for additional therapeutic benefits Disadvantages • Resistance can arise (may use cocktails) • Immune response of host may limit or prevent the re-use • The development of phage– neutralizing antibodies-The production of neutralizing antibodies should not be a significant obstacle during initial or relatively short-term therapeutic treatments at least.
  • 28.
    Challenges • Specificity ofphages • Novelty • Efficacy and other technical challenges • Regulatory approvals • Market acceptance • Patient safety
  • 29.
    Conclusions • Multidrug resistancebacteria have opened a second window for phage therapy • Modern innovations combined with careful scientific methodology can enhance mankind’s ability to make it work this time around • Phage therapy can then serve as a stand alone therapy for infections that are fully resistant • It will then be serve as a co-therapeutic agent for infections that are still susceptible to antibiotics by helping to prevent the emergence of bacterial mutants against either agent
  • 32.
    References • Hugos andRussel’s Microbiology • Carlton R M (1999) Phage therapy: Past history and Future prospects • Broxmeyer et al. 2002. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1155-1160. • (Dabrowska et al. 2005. Bacteriophage penetration in vertebrates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98: 7-13.) • Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1301-1307. • Nature Reviews/Drug Discovery 2: 489-497. • www.phagetherapycenter.com/ - Phage Therapy Center of Tbilsi, Georgia. “…effective treatment solution for patients who have bacterial infections that do not respond to conventional antibiotics” • http://www.researchgate.net/publication/8514842_Bacteriophage_lambda_is_a_h ighly_stable_DNA_vaccine_delivery_vehicle

Editor's Notes

  • #7 Plaque assay Method Plaque forming unit (pfu) Measures infectious particles
  • #24 in situ means to examine the phenomenon exactly in place where it occurs (i.e., without moving it to some special medium). Phage display is a laboratory technique for the study of protein–protein, protein–peptide, and protein–DNA interactions that uses bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria) to connect proteins with the genetic information that encodes them.[1] In this technique, a gene encoding a protein of interest is inserted into a phage coat protein gene, causing the phage to "display" the protein on its outside while containing the gene for the protein on its inside, resulting in a connection between genotype and phenotype. These displaying phages can then be screened against other proteins, peptides or DNA sequences, in order to detect interaction between the displayed protein and those other molecules. In this way, large libraries of proteins can be screened and amplified in a process called in vitro selection, which is analogous to natural selection. Review Article Bacteriophages for prophylaxis and therapy in cattle, poultry and pigs Abstract The successful use of virulent (lytic) bacteriophages (phages) in preventing and treating neonatal enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infections in calves, lambs and pigs has prompted investigation of other applications of phage therapy in food animals. While results have been very variable, some indicate that phage therapy is potentially useful in virulent Salmonella and E. coli infections in chickens, calves and pigs, and in control of the food-borne pathogens Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni in chickens and E. coli O157:H7 in cattle. However, more rigorous and comprehensive research is required to determine the true potential of phage therapy. Particular challenges include the selection and characterization of phages, practical modes of administration, and development of formulations that maintain the viability of phages for administration. Also, meaningful evaluation of phage therapy will require animal studies that closely represent the intended use, and will include thorough investigation of the emergence and characteristics of phage resistant bacteria. As well, effective use will require understanding the ecology and dynamics of the endemic and therapeutic phages and their interactions with target bacteria in the farm environment. In the event that the potential of phage therapy is realized, adoption will depend on its efficacy and complementarity relative to other interventions. Another potential challenge will be regulatory approval. (Received October 15 2008) (Accepted October 19 2008)
  • #26 Phage typing is a method used for detecting single strains of bacteria. It is used to trace the source of outbreaks of infections.[1] The viruses that infect bacteria are called bacteriophages ("phages" for short) and some of these can only infect a single strain of bacteria. These phages are used to identify different strains of bacteria within a single species. A culture of the strain is grown in the agar and dried. A grid is drawn on the base of the petri dish to mark out different regions. Inoculation of each square of the grid is done by a different phage. The phage drops are allowed to dry and are incubated: The susceptible phage regions will show a circular clearing where the bacteria have been lysed, and this is used in differentiation