Dr. Imran Zahid
PGR surgical unit-1
Defination
 Periampullary tumors are neoplasms that arise in the
vicinity of ampulla of Vater
or
 Tumors that are located within one cm of papilla of
vater.
Components of Periampullary tumor
 Terminal common bile duct
 Terminal pancreatic duct or head of pancrease
 Adjacent duodenal mucosa
Cholangiocarcinoma
 Cholangiocarcinoma is the bile duct cancers arising in
the intra-hepatic, peri-hilar, or distal (extra-hepatic)
biliary tree, exclusive of gallbladder or ampulla of
Vater.
Distal cholangiocarcinoma/
periampullary tumor
 Tumor that arise from terminal bile duct is called
periampullary tumor.
Introduction
 Arise from the epithelial cells of the bile ducts
 Tumor distribution
 – Peri-hilar tumors 50%
 – Distal extra-hepatic tumors 40%
 – Intra-hepatic tumors 10%
Epidemiology
 3% of all GI malignany
 The high prevalence in Asian descent is attributable to
endemic chronic parasitic infestation
 Highest prevalence rate in males and females in their
60s and 70s
 The male-to-female ratio - 1:15 in <40 yrs of age
1:2.5 in 60s & 70s
Risk factors
 Primary sclerosing cholangitis
 Fibrocystic liver disease
 Parasitic infection
 Cholelithiasis and hepatolithiasis
 Lynch syndrome & biliary papillomatosis
 Viral Hepatitis
 Toxins
 Diabetes
 Obesity
 HIV
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
 Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic,
idiopathic, cholestatic liver disease characterized
histologically by peribiliary inflammation and fibrosis.
 It can lead to end stage cirrhosis and is a recognized
risk factor for hepatobiliary cancers
 30% cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed in PSC ± UC
 Develops at younger age (30-50yrs) in PSC
 Lifetime risk of cholangiocarcinoma in PSC – 10-15%
Risk factors
 • Parasitic infection
 Liver flukes: Clonorchis and Opisthorchis
 Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma
 Chronic inflammation in proximal biliary tree
 • Cholelithiasis & hepatolithiasis
 Strong risk factor for gall bladder cancer
 Association with cholangiocarcinoma
 Strong association between hepatolithiasis and
cholangiocarcinoma
Molecular pathology
Precursors to cholangiocarcinoma
 Biliary intra-epithelial neoplasia (BilN) – more common
 Intra-ductal papillary neoplasm (IPMN)
 Precursors harbor mutations in p53 & loss of SMAD4
 Molecular defects involves oncogenes & tumor suppresor
genes
 Oncogenes
 K-ras, c-erbB-2, BRAF, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, EGFR
 Tumor suppressor genes
 p53, SMAD4, CDKN2A
 Molecular pathology
 Neoplastic transformation - association with a constitutive
production of IL-6, which has positive cytoplasmic
immunohisotchemical staining and over-expression of IL-6
messenger RNA and protein in cholangiocarcinoma cells
 Cholangiocarcinoma growth facilitated by increased
angiogenesis mediated by over-expression of VEGF, COX-2,
and TGF-b1
Pathology
 Adenocarcinoma - >90%
 Sclerosing
 Most common type
 Characteristic feature - desmoplastic reaction
 Extensive fibrosis – pre-operative diagnosis difficult
 Early invasion of bile duct wall – low resectibility and
cure rate
Pathology
 Nodular
 Presented as constricting annular lesion of bile duct
 Highly invasive – most pts have advanced diseases at
time of diagnosis
 Very low resectibility and cure rate
 Papillary
 Rarest
 Usually present as bulky mass in CBD lumen causing
biliary obstruction in early period
 Highest resectibility and cure rates
Histological types
 Carcinoma insitu
 Adenocarcinoma intestinal type
 Mucinious adenocarcinoma
 Clear cell adenocarcinoma
 Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma
 Adenosqumaous carcinoma
 Squmaous cell carcinoma
 Papillary carcinoma invasive and non-invasive
Clinical presentation
 Cholangiocarcinomas become symptomatic when the tumor
obstructs the biliary drainage system, causing painless jaundice
that is the leading symptom more than 90% in patients.
 Common symptoms
 Pruritus – 66%
 Abdominal pain – 30-50%
 Weight loss – 30-50%
 Fever – up-to 20%
 Cholangitis is unusual
 Signs
 Jaundice – 90%
 Hepatomegaly - 25-40%
 Right upper quadrant mass – 10%
Courvoisier’s Law
Diagnosis
 Laboratoty investigations
 T.bilirubin > 10mg%
 Elevated both toal and direct bilirubin
 2- 10 fold increase ALP
 SGOT, SGPT – initially normal, elevated in chronic
biliary obstruction
Tumor Markers
 CA 19-9
 Widely used for detecting cholangiocarcinoma,
particularly in PSC
 Elevated CA 19-9 – pancreatic exocrine and
neuroendocrine tumors, biliary cancer, HCC, gasrtric
cancer, colo-rectal cancer, acute cholangitis, cirhhosis
 Some tumor produce low level or no CA 19-9
 Sensitivity 89%
 Specificity 86%
Tumor markers
 CEA
 Neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific to diagnose
cholangiocarcinoma
 Elevated CEA – gastritis, PUD, diverticulitis, COPD,
DM, liver disease
 Biliary CEA elevated five-fold compared to those with
benign strictures
Diagnosis
 Radiographic evaluation/USG
Most of jaundiced pt undergo initial USG abdomen to
confirm biliary ductal dilatation, localize site of
obstruction and exclude gallstones
Obstructing lesion suggested by ductal dilatation
(>6mm) in absence of stones.
Papillary tumor - polypoidal intra-luminal masses•
Nodular lesions – smooth masses with mural
thickening
 CT scan
Useful for detection of intra-hepatic tumors, level of
biliary obstruction, liver atrophy
CBD tumor – distended gall bladder, dilated
inntrahepatic and extra-hepatic ducts
• PV branch invasion – biliary duct dilatation within
atrophied lobe with hypertrophic c/l lobe
A helical CT scan can detect cholingiocarcinoma greater
1cm, relatiomship between the tumor and adjacent
organs and vascular involvement.
 MRI
MRI is best modality for diagnisis and staging of
cholangiocarcinoma
 ERCP
Preoperative cholangiography (diagnostic or
therapeutic) in biliary obstruction
– Distal obstruction
– Pre-operative biliary drainage is needed
– Tissue diagnosis/ cytology
Endoscopic brush cytology – sensitivity 35-70%
Endoscopic cytology + biopsy – sensitivity 43-88%
 Endoscopic ultrasound
To visualize local extent of primary tumor and status
of regional nodes in distal bile duct lesion
EUS-guided FNAB of tumors / enlarged nodes
 PET scan
Visualization of cholangiocarcinoma is possible due to
high glucose uptake of bile duct epithelium
• Detect nodular tumor up-to 1cm
• Less helpful in infiltrating tumors
• Most important role in identifying occult metastasis
TNM classification
 T1 Histologicaly confined to bile duct
 T2 Invasion beyond bile duct
 T3 Invasion of gall bladder, pancreas,
 duodenum, other adjacent organs without
 involvement of celiac axis or SMA
 T4 Involvement of celiac axis or SMA
 N1 Regional nodal metastasis
 M1 Distant metastasis
Staging
 Stage 0 Tis, N0, M0
 Stage I A T1, N0, M0
 Stage I B T2, N0, M0
 Stage II A T3, N0, M0
 Stage II B T1-3, N1, M0
 Stage III T4, Any N, M0
 Stage IV Any T, Any N, M1
Treatment
Depends on resectability of tumor.
Resectability Criteria
Absence of retro-pancreatic and para-celiac nodal
metastases or distant liver metastases
Absence of invasion of the portal vein or main hepatic
artery
Absence of extra-hepatic adjacent organ invasion
Absence of disseminated disease
 Radiological criteria for unresectability
Encasement or occlusion of the main PV proximal to its
Bifurcation
Involvement of b/l hepatic arteries
Surgical Management
 Pancreaticodudenectomy (Classical whipple )
 Pylorus preserving Pancreaticodudenectomy
(Modified whipple)
 Local excision(Transdudenal Papillodudenectomy)
Adjuvant therapy
For resected, margin-positive disease -
Fluoropyrimidine-based chemo-radiotherapy followed
by additional Fluoropyrimidine-based or
Gemcitabine-based
chemotherapy, or if the nodes are positive,
Fluoropyrimidine-based or Gemcitabine-based
chemotherapy alone.
Prognosis
Depends on extent of local invasion of primary lesion
Lymph node involvement
Vascular invasion
Perineural invasion
Uninvolved surgical margins
If tumor is resectable, five year survival is 20-60%
(avarege 35%)
Paliative Treatment
If tumor is unrescable and advance paliative treatment
can be used
1. Stent (Plastic/metal)
2. Photodynamic therapy
3. Paliative radiotherapy
4. Chemotherapy

Periampullary Tumors.pptx

  • 2.
    Dr. Imran Zahid PGRsurgical unit-1
  • 3.
    Defination  Periampullary tumorsare neoplasms that arise in the vicinity of ampulla of Vater or  Tumors that are located within one cm of papilla of vater.
  • 5.
    Components of Periampullarytumor  Terminal common bile duct  Terminal pancreatic duct or head of pancrease  Adjacent duodenal mucosa
  • 9.
    Cholangiocarcinoma  Cholangiocarcinoma isthe bile duct cancers arising in the intra-hepatic, peri-hilar, or distal (extra-hepatic) biliary tree, exclusive of gallbladder or ampulla of Vater.
  • 10.
    Distal cholangiocarcinoma/ periampullary tumor Tumor that arise from terminal bile duct is called periampullary tumor.
  • 11.
    Introduction  Arise fromthe epithelial cells of the bile ducts  Tumor distribution  – Peri-hilar tumors 50%  – Distal extra-hepatic tumors 40%  – Intra-hepatic tumors 10%
  • 12.
    Epidemiology  3% ofall GI malignany  The high prevalence in Asian descent is attributable to endemic chronic parasitic infestation  Highest prevalence rate in males and females in their 60s and 70s  The male-to-female ratio - 1:15 in <40 yrs of age 1:2.5 in 60s & 70s
  • 13.
    Risk factors  Primarysclerosing cholangitis  Fibrocystic liver disease  Parasitic infection  Cholelithiasis and hepatolithiasis  Lynch syndrome & biliary papillomatosis  Viral Hepatitis  Toxins  Diabetes  Obesity  HIV
  • 14.
    Primary sclerosing cholangitis Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, idiopathic, cholestatic liver disease characterized histologically by peribiliary inflammation and fibrosis.  It can lead to end stage cirrhosis and is a recognized risk factor for hepatobiliary cancers  30% cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed in PSC ± UC  Develops at younger age (30-50yrs) in PSC  Lifetime risk of cholangiocarcinoma in PSC – 10-15%
  • 15.
    Risk factors  •Parasitic infection  Liver flukes: Clonorchis and Opisthorchis  Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma  Chronic inflammation in proximal biliary tree  • Cholelithiasis & hepatolithiasis  Strong risk factor for gall bladder cancer  Association with cholangiocarcinoma  Strong association between hepatolithiasis and cholangiocarcinoma
  • 16.
    Molecular pathology Precursors tocholangiocarcinoma  Biliary intra-epithelial neoplasia (BilN) – more common  Intra-ductal papillary neoplasm (IPMN)  Precursors harbor mutations in p53 & loss of SMAD4  Molecular defects involves oncogenes & tumor suppresor genes  Oncogenes  K-ras, c-erbB-2, BRAF, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, EGFR  Tumor suppressor genes  p53, SMAD4, CDKN2A
  • 17.
     Molecular pathology Neoplastic transformation - association with a constitutive production of IL-6, which has positive cytoplasmic immunohisotchemical staining and over-expression of IL-6 messenger RNA and protein in cholangiocarcinoma cells  Cholangiocarcinoma growth facilitated by increased angiogenesis mediated by over-expression of VEGF, COX-2, and TGF-b1
  • 18.
    Pathology  Adenocarcinoma ->90%  Sclerosing  Most common type  Characteristic feature - desmoplastic reaction  Extensive fibrosis – pre-operative diagnosis difficult  Early invasion of bile duct wall – low resectibility and cure rate
  • 19.
    Pathology  Nodular  Presentedas constricting annular lesion of bile duct  Highly invasive – most pts have advanced diseases at time of diagnosis  Very low resectibility and cure rate  Papillary  Rarest  Usually present as bulky mass in CBD lumen causing biliary obstruction in early period  Highest resectibility and cure rates
  • 20.
    Histological types  Carcinomainsitu  Adenocarcinoma intestinal type  Mucinious adenocarcinoma  Clear cell adenocarcinoma  Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma  Adenosqumaous carcinoma  Squmaous cell carcinoma  Papillary carcinoma invasive and non-invasive
  • 21.
    Clinical presentation  Cholangiocarcinomasbecome symptomatic when the tumor obstructs the biliary drainage system, causing painless jaundice that is the leading symptom more than 90% in patients.  Common symptoms  Pruritus – 66%  Abdominal pain – 30-50%  Weight loss – 30-50%  Fever – up-to 20%  Cholangitis is unusual  Signs  Jaundice – 90%  Hepatomegaly - 25-40%  Right upper quadrant mass – 10%
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Diagnosis  Laboratoty investigations T.bilirubin > 10mg%  Elevated both toal and direct bilirubin  2- 10 fold increase ALP  SGOT, SGPT – initially normal, elevated in chronic biliary obstruction
  • 24.
    Tumor Markers  CA19-9  Widely used for detecting cholangiocarcinoma, particularly in PSC  Elevated CA 19-9 – pancreatic exocrine and neuroendocrine tumors, biliary cancer, HCC, gasrtric cancer, colo-rectal cancer, acute cholangitis, cirhhosis  Some tumor produce low level or no CA 19-9  Sensitivity 89%  Specificity 86%
  • 25.
    Tumor markers  CEA Neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific to diagnose cholangiocarcinoma  Elevated CEA – gastritis, PUD, diverticulitis, COPD, DM, liver disease  Biliary CEA elevated five-fold compared to those with benign strictures
  • 26.
    Diagnosis  Radiographic evaluation/USG Mostof jaundiced pt undergo initial USG abdomen to confirm biliary ductal dilatation, localize site of obstruction and exclude gallstones Obstructing lesion suggested by ductal dilatation (>6mm) in absence of stones. Papillary tumor - polypoidal intra-luminal masses• Nodular lesions – smooth masses with mural thickening
  • 27.
     CT scan Usefulfor detection of intra-hepatic tumors, level of biliary obstruction, liver atrophy CBD tumor – distended gall bladder, dilated inntrahepatic and extra-hepatic ducts • PV branch invasion – biliary duct dilatation within atrophied lobe with hypertrophic c/l lobe A helical CT scan can detect cholingiocarcinoma greater 1cm, relatiomship between the tumor and adjacent organs and vascular involvement.
  • 28.
     MRI MRI isbest modality for diagnisis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma
  • 29.
     ERCP Preoperative cholangiography(diagnostic or therapeutic) in biliary obstruction – Distal obstruction – Pre-operative biliary drainage is needed – Tissue diagnosis/ cytology Endoscopic brush cytology – sensitivity 35-70% Endoscopic cytology + biopsy – sensitivity 43-88%
  • 30.
     Endoscopic ultrasound Tovisualize local extent of primary tumor and status of regional nodes in distal bile duct lesion EUS-guided FNAB of tumors / enlarged nodes
  • 31.
     PET scan Visualizationof cholangiocarcinoma is possible due to high glucose uptake of bile duct epithelium • Detect nodular tumor up-to 1cm • Less helpful in infiltrating tumors • Most important role in identifying occult metastasis
  • 32.
    TNM classification  T1Histologicaly confined to bile duct  T2 Invasion beyond bile duct  T3 Invasion of gall bladder, pancreas,  duodenum, other adjacent organs without  involvement of celiac axis or SMA  T4 Involvement of celiac axis or SMA  N1 Regional nodal metastasis  M1 Distant metastasis
  • 33.
    Staging  Stage 0Tis, N0, M0  Stage I A T1, N0, M0  Stage I B T2, N0, M0  Stage II A T3, N0, M0  Stage II B T1-3, N1, M0  Stage III T4, Any N, M0  Stage IV Any T, Any N, M1
  • 34.
    Treatment Depends on resectabilityof tumor. Resectability Criteria Absence of retro-pancreatic and para-celiac nodal metastases or distant liver metastases Absence of invasion of the portal vein or main hepatic artery Absence of extra-hepatic adjacent organ invasion Absence of disseminated disease
  • 35.
     Radiological criteriafor unresectability Encasement or occlusion of the main PV proximal to its Bifurcation Involvement of b/l hepatic arteries
  • 36.
    Surgical Management  Pancreaticodudenectomy(Classical whipple )  Pylorus preserving Pancreaticodudenectomy (Modified whipple)  Local excision(Transdudenal Papillodudenectomy)
  • 37.
    Adjuvant therapy For resected,margin-positive disease - Fluoropyrimidine-based chemo-radiotherapy followed by additional Fluoropyrimidine-based or Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, or if the nodes are positive, Fluoropyrimidine-based or Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy alone.
  • 38.
    Prognosis Depends on extentof local invasion of primary lesion Lymph node involvement Vascular invasion Perineural invasion Uninvolved surgical margins If tumor is resectable, five year survival is 20-60% (avarege 35%)
  • 39.
    Paliative Treatment If tumoris unrescable and advance paliative treatment can be used 1. Stent (Plastic/metal) 2. Photodynamic therapy 3. Paliative radiotherapy 4. Chemotherapy