2. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla ( is a Bollywood film of 1986, directed
by Basu Chatterjee. It is a remake of the Golden Bear winning, American
motion picture 12 Angry Men (1957), which was directed by Sidney Lumet.
A Brief Introduction :
Ek Ruka Hua Faisla 12 Angry Men
3. Few Facts – the Character
•The story moves around a boy who is 19 years old.
•Lives in slums
•Belongs to minority
•Childhood was in miserable conditions
•His mother died when he was 9 years old
•His father was a drinker, quarrelsome & a cruel person, used to beat him
daily
•He hit a stone on his teacher when he was 10 years old
•Engaged in Car theft & gambling
•Expert in knife playing
•He was sent to Reformity School for 1.5 years against a case.
Background : There is a 19 yrs old boy who has been alleged as murder of
his father by the court .
Court Decision : A panel of 12 Juror appointed to decide that, the boy has
actually murdered his father or not.
Clause in Court’s statement : Jurors have to make One Decision either
murder or not-murderer.
Re-take :
The Character
4. Juror of the Case
Deepak Kejriwal Pankaj Kapur S. M. Zaheer
Subhash Udghate Hemant Mishra M. K. Raina K. K. Raina
Annu Kapoor Subbiraj Shailendra Goel Aziz Qureshi
Amitabh Srivastava
5. The knife; the tool used to murder the old man
Eye witness 1 – an old man who was the neighbor of the vict
Eye witness 2 – a lady who lives opposite to the victim’s hou
Key evidences in the Murder Case
7. 1
• A man with facts and figures
• Had full knowledge of the case
2
• “7 nai 8 bje“
• “chaku ki baat bahut ehmiyat rakhti hai iss case mai”
3
• A man with ethics and values
• The man understands his rights and enlightens
everyone about the constitutional rights of a citizen.
JUROR 11
(Mr. Shailendra Goel )
8. 4
• Juror 11 has a analytical eye and did raise a point
which was later one of the various strong point on
the basis of which the convict was declared not-guilty
5
• Juror 11 is a person who usually controls his anger
but when he saw disrespect towards a old person by a
fellow juror he reacted aggressively that depicts a
sense of aggression in the persons character
6
• 4th one to change the vote
• Is well behaved and stands up for what is right
JUROR 11
(Mr. Shailendra Goel )
10. 1
• Advertisement Profession
• Looks were good and gave a impression of a rich individual
2
• Is extremely confused
• Called himself a Creative person
3
• Disinterested in proceedings for most of the time.
• Gave the suggestion which proved useful.
4
• Influenced easily by other’s view.
• Only Juror to change his vote twice.
JUROR 12
(Mr. Aziz Qureshi)