1) A throughput testing was conducted using OSS and drive test methods on site LBHWL22 to compare the results. 2) Using multiple FTP sessions, throughput was measured every 15 minutes over 1 hour for a UE on the site. 3) The results showed that the drive test throughput was slightly higher than the OSS throughput, but both followed the same trend over time.

1. SUBHASH KUMAR 03-Aug-2016 – V.01
OSS Vs Drive Test
Throughput Testing
IDEA LTE -FDD

2. Ericsson Internal | 2016-04-12 | Page 2
Descriptionof test
› To Compare theOSS Vs DriveTestThroughput stationarytest wascarried outon LBHWL22 Site on 3rd Aug
2016 from 2:15PM to 3:15PM
– Site Capacity 5MH FDD.
– Band 1800Mhz.
– Site was selectedsuch that therewillbe lessactive user on site whiletesting (at timeof test aprox useron site3)
– Simultaneous multiple FTPsessions created in one UE& high data was downloaded for 1hr.for comparison
at 15mingranularity
– Formulaused for UEthroughputis
– (pmPdcpVolDlDrb-pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI)/pmUeThpTimeDl
.

3. Ericsson Internal | 2016-04-12 | Page 3
Test result
Drivetest
Date Time Object pmPdcpVolDlDrb pmPdcpVolDlDrbLastTTI pmUeThpTimeDl DL_THP_Kbps DL_THP_mbps
PDCP Thruput Mbps
(Drive Log)
8/3/2016 6:45 EUtranCellFDD=LBHWL22L 25113349 111147 892933 28000.08735 27.34 27.92
8/3/2016 7:00 EUtranCellFDD=LBHWL22L 26691432 22623 897273 29722.06787 29.03 29.83
8/3/2016 7:15 EUtranCellFDD=LBHWL22L 28261868 26717 902129 31298.35201 30.56 31.44
8/3/2016 7:30 EUtranCellFDD=LBHWL22L 28652868 17182 967884 29585.86566 28.89 30.08
OSS
OSSVsDrivetest
Throughput KPI showin
Sametrend.
Drive Test throughput is slightly better than OSS throughput. Time 6.45 in OSS Corresponds to 2.15PM of system time

4. Ericsson Internal | 2016-04-12 | Page 4
OSSThroughput Snap