Downloaded 12 times
![for Elsevier (in 2016*)
37% profit
margin
'The publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of
Health - 13/12/2017
Stephen Buranyi, The Guardian, 27/06/17 [link]
Alex Holcombe, 21/05/15 [link]
In 2014:
*RELX Group 2016 Results
Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/kpjfqpsrwckgzq1zctma-signature-9b837c5f1ec83b0c4c547a62bf8d4f3f3142b37907d3f827d43e0ee266376bd4-poli-180620183320/85/Open-Science-Open-Access-13-320.jpg)
![WHATISAREPOSITORY?
'The publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of
Health - 13/12/2017
KATIE FORTNEY AND JUSTIN GONDER [link]
University of California Office of Scholarly Communication,
01/12/2015
Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/kpjfqpsrwckgzq1zctma-signature-9b837c5f1ec83b0c4c547a62bf8d4f3f3142b37907d3f827d43e0ee266376bd4-poli-180620183320/85/Open-Science-Open-Access-56-320.jpg)
Uploaded byPaola Gargiulo
Open Science, Open Access
The document discusses the concept of open science as the practice of sharing scientific knowledge openly at all stages of research, highlighting issues in traditional scholarly communication such as high subscription prices and the pressure on researchers to publish. It outlines the benefits of open science for increased visibility, citations, and collaboration, while also addressing the challenges to changing the existing publication model. Various stakeholders, including governments and research institutions, are encouraged to adopt open access policies and support open science initiatives to foster transparency and improved research quality.
More Related Content
Similar to Open Science, Open Access
Open Science, Open Access
- 1. Open Science, Open Access PaolaGargiulo (NOAD- OpenAIRE/Cineca) p. gargiulo@cineca.it Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca 19 aprile 2018
- 2. OpenAIRE Workshop @Ghent, Nov. 2015
- 3. A definition ofOpen Science Michael Nielsen: "Open science is the idea that scientific knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as is practical in the discovery process." … scientific knowledge of all kinds: includes journal articles, data, code, online software tools, questions, ideas, and speculations; anything which can be considered knowledge. as is practical: very often there are other factors (legal, ethical, social, etc) that must be considered. Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton University Press, 2011) michaelnielsen.org/blog/open-science/
- 4.
- 5. What is OpenScience ? CC-BY Andreas Neuhold https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Science_-_Prinzipien.png • Access to research facilities • Access to processing capabilities • Communication at all levels of research life cycle = unrestricted online access to peer- reviewed scholarly research.
- 6.
- 7. The traditional scholarlycommunication model Source: P.Perakakis https://www.slideshare.net/PandelisPerakakis • Registration (to keep a priority record/time stamp to note who submitted the scholarly results first) • Validation (peer review to assure quality /filtering) • Dissemination (to share the findings) • Preservation/Archiving (to preserve it for future generations) The most critical point
- 8. Research er Manuscript Research project Journal Journal editors Reviewer s Publisher Copy-editing Article published Public Read article 'Thepublishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Library consorti um Research Institutio ns Images: John R. McKiernan, Why Open Research? Nick Kim, Science and Ink Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 9. Who is payingin the traditional communication model? The research is paid with public funds in most of the cases The author of the manuscript/ paper is not paid, sometimes he/she has to pay for extra pages, colour pages, images, etc The reviewers are not paid either Neither the journal editor (only few exceptions) All this work is done for free, for sharing the results Libraries pay to access the content through journal subscriptions, often subscriptions are paid through consortial deal (in Italy through Crui-Care) Sometimes single researcher pays to access content (up to 30 o more US dollars to download an article)
- 10. Research er Manuscript Research project Journal Journal editors Reviewer s Publisher Copy-editing Article published Public Governme nt Read article Sourcce:reaadapted from The he publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Library consorti um Research Institutio ns Images: John R. McKiernan, Why Open Research? Nick Kim, Science and Ink Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 11. The increase injournal subscription prices
- 12. ‘Readapted from Thepublishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Piled Higher and Deeper, PhD Comics https://goo.gl/8ADQ7H Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International Price increase and cost of subscriptions
- 13. for Elsevier (in2016*) 37% profit margin 'The publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Stephen Buranyi, The Guardian, 27/06/17 [link] Alex Holcombe, 21/05/15 [link] In 2014: *RELX Group 2016 Results Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 14. Research er Manuscript Research project Journal Journal editors Reviewer s Publisher Copy-editing Article published Public Governme nt Copyright transferredto publisher Read article 'The publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Library consorti um Research Institutio ns Images: John R. McKiernan, Why Open Research? Nick Kim, Science and Ink Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 15. The scientist andthe academic: different perspective Source:P: Perakakis https://www.slideshare.net/PandelisPerakakis
- 16.
- 17. Research Integrity becomes anissue • Authors are pressed to publish articles in order to get funds to continue their research • This pressure results in lower quality of research, lower quality of papers, lower quality in peer-reviewing • To the point to misinterpret results,to publish not replicable results, or even worse fake data, fake articles etc • Bad Science https://openparachute.wordp ress.com/2015/01/04/spottin g-bad-science/
- 18. Misconduct and scientificpublishing Source:P. Perakakis https://www.slideshare.net/PandelisPerakakis
- 19. Bad science Source :P.Perakakis https://www.slideshare.net/PandelisPerakakis
- 20.
- 21. The quality ofdata: the reproducibility of data
- 22. What are theissues? Low quality of the article and of data, which means low quality of research which results in bad science Distorsion in the research assessment/evaluation No best use of communication and information technology PRICE INCREASE OF JOURNALS NO ACCESS, NO READ JOURNALS PRICES ARE TOO HIGH, LIBRARIES CANNOT AFFORD SUBSCRIBING JOURNALS What are the consequences of the current traditional communication model OpenAIRE Workshop @ Ghent, Nov. 2015
- 23. OPEN SCIENCE OPEN PUBLICATIONS OPENDATA, What is the solution?
- 24. Open Science OPENESS ALLOWS: TRANSPARENCY IN THE RESEARCH PROCESS COLLABORATION VERSUS COMPETITION RESULTS (DATA AND PUBLICTATIONS ) ACCESSIBLE TO EVERYBODY ALL OVER THE WORLD EXPERIMENT NEW MODELS OF COMMUNICATION, PLATFORMS, INFRASTRUCTURE MORE IMPACT OF RESEARCH RESULTS AND NEW WAYS TO MEASURE IMPACT BETTER COMUNICATION OF SCIENCE AND IMPACT ON CITIZEN SCIENCE OpenAIRE Workshop @ Ghent, Nov. 2015
- 25. Benefits for researchers/1 More visibility… …more dissemination… …more impact …more citations (up to 600% more according do the discipline) The following slides on benefits are by Elena Giglia- Open Access Officer- University of Torino- available at http://www.oa.unito.it/new/materiale-scaricabile/
- 26. Benefits for researchers:citations /2 Size of OA citation advantage when found (and where explicitly stated by discipline) % increase in citations with Open Access Physics/astronomy 170 to 580 Mathematics 35 to 91 Biology -5 to 36 Electrical engineering 51 Computer science 157 Political science 86 Philosophy 45 Medicine 300 to 450 Communications studies (IT) 200 Agricultural sciences 200 to 600 Swan, A. (2010) The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date Data from Gargouri & Harnad, 2010 OA non OA % citations increase Ray Frost, Queensland University of Technology source: Elena Giglia- Open Access Officer- University of Torino- available at http://www.oa.unito.it/new/materiale-scaricabile/
- 27. Open Access :benefits/ 3 …quick circulation of ideas… … higher visibility in search engine (Google, Google Scholar…) …linking with research data …acceleration in the creation process of knowledge Source: Elena Giglia- Open Access Officer- University of Torino- available at http://www.oa.unito.it/new/materiale-scaricabile
- 28.
- 29. Open Research Data:benefits / 1 A more solid science To compare your data To create new knowledge by adding your data To foster a cross disciplinary approach Useful to solve the global challanges (climate, energy etc) it is better to base one’s research on data rather than on the interpretation of data found in an article
- 30. dati •archiviati •catalogat i •ricercabili •accessibi Collected data can beused with no extra charge, from different perspectives and approaches If data circulates rapidly and globally, Creation of knowledge accelerates Open Research Data: benefits/ 2 A more efficient and effecttive science Iinteroperabilty and standards infrastructures
- 31. Why is itso difficult to change this communication model ? OpenAIRE Workshop @ Ghent, Nov. 2015 • Too many vested interests? Yes, • From big publishers’ perspective: Why should they change? They make a lot of money • The implications and the consequences of copyright transfer • The national evaluation agencies and also research performing institutions still rely greatly on commercial citation databases and on Impact Factor (IF), non high impact journals, on quantitative metrics,or selected list of journals… therefore contribute to keep the status quo… Find new measurements is complex….. Do we really need them? Which criteria should be used for a fair distribution of funding? • Researchers are inevitably(?) complices of this system as their research funds assignement, career etc depend on assessment made on the quantitative criteria mentioned above
- 32. Changes are needed Allthe stakeholders (governaments, funders,, research performing institutions, research evaluation agencies researchers, publishers, libraries) have to be engaged: What some governaments are doing: develop a national policy to support and promote Open Science (see, EC, Nordic countries, UK, Netherlands, France) What many funders are doing : mandate Open publications and open data (European Commission, Wellcome Trust, Melissa and Bill Gates Foundation, Telethon, NHI) for all the funded projects What research performing institutions are doing : mandate Open publications and Open Data for all researchers ,promote and engage in new business models for publications (OS policies) 20150528_webinar-OA
- 33. Changes are needed- 2 National Research Evaluation Agencies: should revise their evaluation criteria and incentivize Open Science Researchers : become more aware of the issue, engage themselves in practising open science… publish in OA journals, share data etc Publishers: a growing number of small and medium publisher is engaging in new publishing models (Gold OA- fair prices, Diamond OA, etc); big publishers are increasing their profits in supporting OA (Hybrid OA) Libraries: are getting more and more supportive of Open Science, giving support to researchers on copyright issues, on training on OS issues, on research data management. Libraries are also trying to flip subscriptions journals into Open Access Articles (see the initiative OpenOA 2020)
- 34. EC - Councilof Competitiveness 26th- 27th 2016
- 35. 1. Rewards/ Incentives 2.Alternative metrics 3. Changing business models for publishing 4. FAIR open data 5. Open Science Cloud 6. Research Integrity 7. Citizen Science 8. Open education & skills EC Open Science Agenda – 8 keys
- 36. 2016 The mandate ofthe Open Science Policy Platform is to : 1. advise the Commission on how to further develop and practically implement open science policy, in line with the priority of Commissioner Moedas to radically improve the quality and impact of European science 2. function as a dynamic, stakeholder-driven mechanism for bringing up and addressing issues of concern for the European science and research community and its representative organisations, following five broad lines for actions which are presented in the draft European Open Science Agenda 3. support policy formulation by helping to identify the issues to be addressed and providing recommendations on the policy actions required 4. support policy implementation, contributing to reviewing best practices, drawing policy guidelines and encouraging their active uptake by stakeholders 5. provide advice and recommendations on any cross-cutting issue affecting Open Science ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=open-science-policy-platform (OSPP)
- 37. 2016 OSSP Working Groups: ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=open-science-policy-platform (OSPP) 1.Rewards 2. Alt-metrics 3. Open Science Cloud 4. Changing business models for publishing 5. Research Integrity 6. Citizen Science 7. Open education and skills 8. FAIR open data
- 38. European Science PolicyPlatform : Recommendations on Open Science Publishing July 2017 Recommendations on Open Science Publishing
- 39. European Science PolicyPlatform : WG Rewards July 2017 Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science
- 40. European Science PolicyPlatform : WG Educations Skills http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_skills_wgreport_final.pdf
- 41. 41 Fonte: Carl Moedas, ECCommissioner for Research and Innovation reports to the Council of Comptetiveness (May 30° 2017)
- 42.
- 44. Credits: Eva Mendez.“Cool” metadata for FAIR data, Nov.15. 2016 The European Open Science Cloud
- 45.
- 46.
- 49.
- 51. Minimum for Open Access = SELF-ARCHIVING =depositonasuitablerepository (embargoperiodmayapply) 'Thepublishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 52. Go even further = IMMEDIATEACCESS + RETAIN RIGHTS =readimmediatelyfromanywhere, includingjournal’swebsite(no embargo) 'The publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Butyoushouldstilldepositonasuitable repository Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 53. Evenwith Green …Know your rights 'The publishing process and Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 https://sparcopen.org/our-work/author- rights/ Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 55. What is anopen repository • An open repository collects OA publications, makes them openly available/downloadable , accessible and interoperable through a protocol OAIPMH and keeps them for long term preservation •BOA is an open institutional repository https://boa.unimib.it/ Find a subject- specific repository: A generic one made available by EC : http://www.opendoar.org/ https://zenodo.org/
- 56. WHATISAREPOSITORY? 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 KATIE FORTNEY AND JUSTIN GONDER [link] University of California Office of Scholarly Communication, 01/12/2015 Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 57. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 WHATISAREPOSITORY? Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 61. In case yourpublisher may refuse to cooperate. What can you do? • As long as you have not signed over your copyright to the publisher yet, it is important to realize that • as the author you are under the obligation of your EC grant to fulfill the open access requirements, and • as the author, you are the legal copyright holder and can decide what to do with your copyright. • This gives you the opportunity to • request the publisher to reconsider his refusal given the EC Open Access policy, or • submit your article to another (Open Access) journal, that enables you to fulfill your requirements. • If the publisher persists in his refusal to sign the Licence to Publish or, Addendum to the Agreement/CTA (see next slide) or refuses to give you permission after you have signed the Agreement/CTA, and you wish your article to be published in his journal, it is important that • you ask the publisher to confirm his refusal of permission in writing, and • inform your EC project officer by providing the publisher's written refusal of permission. 20150528_webinar-OA
- 62. Addendum to thecontract: proposal of the Commission A model of publishing agreement suggested by the Commission This model is not mandatory but reflects the obligations for the beneficiary under the H2020 grant agreements. It can be supplemented by further provisions agreed between the parties, provided they are compatible with the Grant Agreement. The Commission/Agency takes no responsibility for the use of this model. The template is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/oa- pilot/h2020-oa-guide-model-for-publishing-a_en.pdf or on the participant portal.
- 64.
- 67.
- 68. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Pre-print Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 69. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Pre-print Post- print Publisher ’s version Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 70. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Pre-print Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 71. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Pre-print Post- print Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 75. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 Journal Publisher Preprint Postprint Publisher' s version Embargo (months) Paid OA? APC Hybrid journal? Listed on DOAJ? American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology APS 12 yes 2000 USD YES Antioxidants & Redox signaling Mary Ann Liebert 12 yes ? YES Atherosclerosis Elsevier 12 yes 3300 USD YES Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Elsevier 12 yes 4050 USD YES Cancer Research AACR 12 YES 3500 USD YES Clinical and Experimental Allergy Wiley 12 yes 4200 USD YES EMBO Molecular Medicine Wiley OA 0 ONLY 4200 USD NO YES Genome Biology BioMed Central 0 ONLY 2975 USD NO YES International Archives of Allergy and Immunology Karger 12 yes 3030 USD YES JAMA Cardiology AMA 12 yes 5000 USD YES Journal of Biological Chemistry ASBMB 0 / 12 ONLY 0 NO Journal of the American College of Cardiology Elsevier 12 yes 3000 USD YES Malaria Journal BioMed Central 0 ONLY 2240 USD NO YES Neuro-Oncology Oxford Uni Press 12 yes 3000 USD YES Oncogene Nature 6 YES 3600 USD YES Pathogens and global health Taylor & Francis 12 yes 2150 EUR YES Plos Medicine PLOS 0 YES 2900 USD NO YES Plos One PLOS 0 YES 1495 USD NO YES Plos Pathogens PLOS 0 YES 2250 USD NO YES PNAS NAS 6 yes 1450 USD YES Stem Cell Research and Therapy BioMed Central 0 YES 2175 USD NO YES Stem Cells Wiley 6 YES 2000 USD YES Stem Cells Translational Medicine Wiley OA 0 YES 1750 USD NO YES The New England Journal of Medicine MMS 6 NO - NO Theranostics Ivyspring 0 ONLY 2500 USD NO NO Vaccine Elsevier 12 yes 2450 USD YES Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 76. Deposit a publication(pre-print, postprint, publisher’s version) in BOA
- 77.
- 78. Assign the accesspolicy
- 79. How to findout about OA Journals • Consult il Directory of Open Access Journals (9500 riviste peer reviewed) • Consult ROAD- Directory of Open Access Resources -Unesco • Also WOS and SCOPUS index Open Access Journals • Consult DOAB - Directory of Open Access Books (165 books publishers)
- 82. 6 MYTHS TOPUT TO REST (P. SUBER)https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education- network/blog/2013/oct/21/open-access-myths-peter-suber- harvard
- 83. The green roadallowsyoutopublishthe post-print ina nonopen accessjournalandmake the article openlyavailable withno embargo ifyou succeedamendingthe contractwiththe publisher Myth 1Theonlywaytoprovide openaccesstopeer-reviewed journalarticlesistopublishin openaccessjournals This is not true
- 84. Chargingpublicationfees(sometimescalled authorfeesor article processingcharges)isthe best-knownbusinessmodel foropen accessjournals,butit's notthe mostcommon.A large majority ofthe journalslistedin DirectoryofOpenAccessJournals(DOAJ) don'tcharge fees. Myth 2 Allormostopen accessjournals charge publicationfees This is not entirely true
- 85. Most of theauthor –side fee are paid by funders and by universties , only 12% is paid by authors (P.Suber, 2013) Myth 3 Mostauthor-sidefeesare paidbytheauthors themselves This is not true
- 86. Myth 4 'The Publishingina conventionaljournal closesthedooron makingthesame workopenaccess? Most ofthe peer reviewed journals in Sherpa Romeo allow the deposition of the post-print, other publishers not listed in Sherpa Romeo allow the deposition of the post-print upon request. It is always possible to negotiate with the publisher and do not transfer all rights.
- 87. Openaccessisaboutdisseminating, sharing,reusing contentciting theoriginal authors Thereviewing process anditsquality isadifferent process whichconcern both subscription journals andOajournals. (predatory journals isanother issue) Anincreasing numberofOAjournals rank amongthetopjournals inseveral disciplines Myth 5 Openaccess journalsare intrinsicallylow inquality
- 88. Myth 6 Openaccess mandatesinfringe academic freedom Nofunders impose on authors where to publish in OA journal or in a subscription. They require that the articles is openly available through the green or the gold route. Green open access is compatible with publishing in non- open access journals, which means that green open access mandates can respect author freedom to publish where they please
- 89.
- 90. Publishing in qualityOA journals: 93 For authors whyopenresearch.org/costs
- 91. VISION OA2020 is aglobal alliance committed to accelerating the transition to open access. MISSION We collaborate to transform the current publishing system, replacing the subscription business model with new models that ensure outputs are open and re-usable and that the costs behind their dissemination are transparent and economically sustainable. EXPRESSION OF INTEREST Join the growing list of institutions around the world who have signed the OA2020 Expression of Interest and are taking active steps to drive the transformation. oa2020.org
- 92.
- 93.
- 94. Select the rightjournal thinkchecksubmit.org/
- 95. How to avoidthe traps of predatory journals (1) Do you or your colleagues know the journal? – Have you read any articles in the journal before? – Is it easy to discover the latest papers in the journal? Can you easily identify and contact the publisher? – Is the publisher name clearly displayed on the journal website? – Can you contact the publisher by telephone, email, and post? Is the journal clear about the type of peer review it uses? Are articles indexed in services that you use? Is it clear what fees will be charged? – Does the journal site explain what these fees are for and when they will be charged?
- 96. How to avoidthe traps of predatory journals (2) Do the editorial board mention the journal on their own websites? Is the publisher a member of a recognized industry initiative? Do they belong to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) ? If the journal is open access, is it listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) ? If the journal is open access, does the publisher belong to the Open Access Scholarly Publishers’ Association (OASPA) ? Is the publisher a member of another trade association Do you recognise the editorial board?
- 97. How to avoidthe traps of predatory journals (2) Do the editorial board mention the journal on their own websites? Is the publisher a member of a recognized industry initiative? Do they belong to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) ? – If the journal is open access, is it listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) ? – If the journal is open access, does the publisher belong to the Open Access Scholarly Publishers’ Association (OASPA) ? – Is the publisher a member of another trade association?
- 98.
- 99. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 From: How To Attribute Creative Commons Photos by Foter Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International
- 101. What is OpenAIRE •EU funded project (2009-2011; 2012-2014; 2015-2018) • A Participatory European Open Access infrastructure to manage scientific publications and associated scientific material via repository networks. • Supports discovery, sharing and re-use of Open Access publications and EC funded research results. • Enhances publications by interconnecting them with data sets, funding information, related publications, institutional afiliation, metrics...
- 102.
- 103. OpenAIRE Workshop @Ghent, Nov. 2015
- 106. 'The publishing processand Open Access' - Workshop series for early career researchers - Luxembourg Institute of Health - 13/12/2017 From: How To Attribute Creative Commons Photos by Foter Share and reuse by citing: Jonathan England, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115405 under CC-BY 4.0 International