- Research infrastructures enable better science by building a common vision, allowing scientists to seamlessly share resources, applying economies of scale, and constructing new resources from combinations of shared ones.
- Open science means broader access to publicly funded research results through open access publications, data, software, methodologies, and more. This helps build on previous work, avoid duplication, speed innovation, and involve citizens.
- The European Commission's open access mandate requires beneficiaries to make publications and underlying data openly available, with possible sanctions for non-compliance like payment suspensions. Research infrastructures and open science publishing aim to increase transparency, reproducibility, and reuse of research outputs.
Doing research better: The role of meta‐dataGarethKnight
Presentation given by David Leon, Professor of Epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in January 2012. Subsequently reused at various internal events
Jonathan Tedds Distinguished Lecture at DLab, UC Berkeley, 12 Sep 2013: "The ...Jonathan Tedds
http://dlab.berkeley.edu/event/open-research-challenge-peer-review-and-publication-research-data
A talk by Dr. Jonathan Tedds, Senior Research Fellow, D2K Data to Knowledge, Dept of Health Sciences, University of Leicester.
PI: #BRISSKit www.brisskit.le.ac.uk
PI: #PREPARDE www.le.ac.uk/projects/preparde
The Peer REview for Publication & Accreditation of Research data in the Earth sciences (PREPARDE) project seeks to capture the processes and procedures required to publish a scientific dataset, ranging from ingestion into a data repository, through to formal publication in a data journal. It will also address key issues arising in the data publication paradigm, namely, how does one peer-review a dataset, what criteria are needed for a repository to be considered objectively trustworthy, and how can datasets and journal publications be effectively cross-linked for the benefit of the wider research community.
I will discuss this and alternative approaches to research data management and publishing through examples in astronomy, biomedical and interdisciplinary research including the arts and humanities. Who can help in the long tail of research if lacking established data centers, archives or adequate institutional support? How much can we transfer from the so called “big data” sciences to other settings and where does the institution fit in with all this? What about software?
Publishing research data brings a wide and differing range of challenges for all involved, whatever the discipline. In PREPARDE we also considered the pre and post publication peer review paradigm, as implemented in the F1000 Research Publishing Model for the life sciences. Finally, in an era of truly international research how might we coordinate the many institutional, regional, national and international initiatives – has the time come for an international Research Data Alliance?
Open Science: for a Better Science
Tuesday 21/02/2017
Aula “Cesare Musatti”, Scuola di Psicologia via Venezia 8, Padova Italy. Publishing Open Access: who pays?
Research data management: a tale of two paradigms: Martin Donnelly
Presentation I was supposed to give at "Scotland’s Collections and the Digital Humanities" workshop in Edinburgh on May 2nd 2014. Illness prevented it, but my heroic DCC colleague Jonathan Rans stepped up and delivered the presentation on my behalf.
Doing research better: The role of meta‐dataGarethKnight
Presentation given by David Leon, Professor of Epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in January 2012. Subsequently reused at various internal events
Jonathan Tedds Distinguished Lecture at DLab, UC Berkeley, 12 Sep 2013: "The ...Jonathan Tedds
http://dlab.berkeley.edu/event/open-research-challenge-peer-review-and-publication-research-data
A talk by Dr. Jonathan Tedds, Senior Research Fellow, D2K Data to Knowledge, Dept of Health Sciences, University of Leicester.
PI: #BRISSKit www.brisskit.le.ac.uk
PI: #PREPARDE www.le.ac.uk/projects/preparde
The Peer REview for Publication & Accreditation of Research data in the Earth sciences (PREPARDE) project seeks to capture the processes and procedures required to publish a scientific dataset, ranging from ingestion into a data repository, through to formal publication in a data journal. It will also address key issues arising in the data publication paradigm, namely, how does one peer-review a dataset, what criteria are needed for a repository to be considered objectively trustworthy, and how can datasets and journal publications be effectively cross-linked for the benefit of the wider research community.
I will discuss this and alternative approaches to research data management and publishing through examples in astronomy, biomedical and interdisciplinary research including the arts and humanities. Who can help in the long tail of research if lacking established data centers, archives or adequate institutional support? How much can we transfer from the so called “big data” sciences to other settings and where does the institution fit in with all this? What about software?
Publishing research data brings a wide and differing range of challenges for all involved, whatever the discipline. In PREPARDE we also considered the pre and post publication peer review paradigm, as implemented in the F1000 Research Publishing Model for the life sciences. Finally, in an era of truly international research how might we coordinate the many institutional, regional, national and international initiatives – has the time come for an international Research Data Alliance?
Open Science: for a Better Science
Tuesday 21/02/2017
Aula “Cesare Musatti”, Scuola di Psicologia via Venezia 8, Padova Italy. Publishing Open Access: who pays?
Research data management: a tale of two paradigms: Martin Donnelly
Presentation I was supposed to give at "Scotland’s Collections and the Digital Humanities" workshop in Edinburgh on May 2nd 2014. Illness prevented it, but my heroic DCC colleague Jonathan Rans stepped up and delivered the presentation on my behalf.
Sbm open science committee report to the boardBradford Hesse
In the spirit of transparency, I am uploading a mid-course presentation I made to the Board of Directors for the Society of Behavioral Medicine on the topic of Open Science. The report embodies the best thinking of some of the greatest thinkers in our field.
Digital Scholar Webinar: Recruiting Research Participants Online Using RedditSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 50-minute presentation introduces r/SampleSize, a community on the website Reddit that allows for online participant recruitment without compulsory or immediate payment. It will provide an overview of best practices for recruiting participants on r/SampleSize. It will also compare r/SampleSize to Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a widely used crowdsourcing platform for recruiting research participants.
INSERM Workshop 246 - Management and reuse of health data: methodological issues: https://ateliersinserm.dakini.fr/en/workshop.246.management.and.reuse.of.health.data.methodological.issues-66-22.php
Privacy in Research Data Managemnt - Use CasesMicah Altman
From Integrating Approaches to Privacy across the Research Lifecycle http://privacytools.seas.harvard.edu/fall-2013-workshop
This workshop will consider how emerging tools and perspectives from a variety of disciplines, such as computer science, social science, law, and the health sciences, should be integrated in the management of confidential research data. Multidisciplinary discussion groups will grapple with these issues in the context of exemplar research use cases.
Finding Information for Foundation Degree in MVCO (DL) StudentsGaz Johnson
Slides for the 19th April lecture given to foundation degree in Managing Community & Voluntary Organisations - detailing data resources and good searching practice.
Research Data Sharing and Re-Use: Practical Implications for Data Citation Pr...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 4, 2018
Speaker: Hyoungjoo Park, PhD candidate, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Dietmar Wolfram, PhD
Overview: It is increasingly common for researchers to make their data freely available. This is often a requirement of funding agencies but also consistent with the principles of open science, according to which all research data should be shared and made available for reuse. Once data is reused, the researchers who have provided access to it should be acknowledged for their contributions, much as authors are recognised for their publications through citation. Hyoungjoo Park and Dietmar Wolfram have studied characteristics of data sharing, reuse, and citation and found that current data citation practices do not yet benefit data sharers, with little or no consistency in their format. More formalised citation practices might encourage more authors to make their data available for reuse.
The Global Open Access Debate & Institutional Repositories for ResearchersGaz Johnson
Talk delivered to the Dermatology research unit at the University of Nottingham Mar 2007; focussing on open access, scholarly communication and repositories
This presentation was provided by Melissa Levine of the University of Michigan during a NISO Virtual Conference on the topic of data curation, held on Wednesday, August 31, 2016
Publishing your research: Open Access (introduction & overview)Jamie Bisset
Open Access: what is it and what do I need to do? (November 2013) slides. Delivered as part of the Durham University Researcher Development Programme. Further Training available at https://www.dur.ac.uk/library/research/training/
Open Research comprises open access to the broad range of research outputs, from journal articles and the underlying data to protocols, results (including negative results), software and tools. Open Research increases inclusivity and collaboration, improves transparency and reproducibility of research and underpins research integrity.
This workshop focuses on the benefits of practicing open research for you as a researcher, to improve discoverability and maximise access to your work and to raise your professional profile.
By the end of the session you will:
• Have an understanding of the principles of Open Research
• Understand open licences and how they apply to publications, data and software
• Be able to apply key tools and techniques to increase the visibility of yourself and your research, including repositories, ORCID, social media and altmetrics
• Describe the different ways of making research and data available open access
Sbm open science committee report to the boardBradford Hesse
In the spirit of transparency, I am uploading a mid-course presentation I made to the Board of Directors for the Society of Behavioral Medicine on the topic of Open Science. The report embodies the best thinking of some of the greatest thinkers in our field.
Digital Scholar Webinar: Recruiting Research Participants Online Using RedditSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 50-minute presentation introduces r/SampleSize, a community on the website Reddit that allows for online participant recruitment without compulsory or immediate payment. It will provide an overview of best practices for recruiting participants on r/SampleSize. It will also compare r/SampleSize to Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a widely used crowdsourcing platform for recruiting research participants.
INSERM Workshop 246 - Management and reuse of health data: methodological issues: https://ateliersinserm.dakini.fr/en/workshop.246.management.and.reuse.of.health.data.methodological.issues-66-22.php
Privacy in Research Data Managemnt - Use CasesMicah Altman
From Integrating Approaches to Privacy across the Research Lifecycle http://privacytools.seas.harvard.edu/fall-2013-workshop
This workshop will consider how emerging tools and perspectives from a variety of disciplines, such as computer science, social science, law, and the health sciences, should be integrated in the management of confidential research data. Multidisciplinary discussion groups will grapple with these issues in the context of exemplar research use cases.
Finding Information for Foundation Degree in MVCO (DL) StudentsGaz Johnson
Slides for the 19th April lecture given to foundation degree in Managing Community & Voluntary Organisations - detailing data resources and good searching practice.
Research Data Sharing and Re-Use: Practical Implications for Data Citation Pr...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 4, 2018
Speaker: Hyoungjoo Park, PhD candidate, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Dietmar Wolfram, PhD
Overview: It is increasingly common for researchers to make their data freely available. This is often a requirement of funding agencies but also consistent with the principles of open science, according to which all research data should be shared and made available for reuse. Once data is reused, the researchers who have provided access to it should be acknowledged for their contributions, much as authors are recognised for their publications through citation. Hyoungjoo Park and Dietmar Wolfram have studied characteristics of data sharing, reuse, and citation and found that current data citation practices do not yet benefit data sharers, with little or no consistency in their format. More formalised citation practices might encourage more authors to make their data available for reuse.
The Global Open Access Debate & Institutional Repositories for ResearchersGaz Johnson
Talk delivered to the Dermatology research unit at the University of Nottingham Mar 2007; focussing on open access, scholarly communication and repositories
This presentation was provided by Melissa Levine of the University of Michigan during a NISO Virtual Conference on the topic of data curation, held on Wednesday, August 31, 2016
Publishing your research: Open Access (introduction & overview)Jamie Bisset
Open Access: what is it and what do I need to do? (November 2013) slides. Delivered as part of the Durham University Researcher Development Programme. Further Training available at https://www.dur.ac.uk/library/research/training/
Open Research comprises open access to the broad range of research outputs, from journal articles and the underlying data to protocols, results (including negative results), software and tools. Open Research increases inclusivity and collaboration, improves transparency and reproducibility of research and underpins research integrity.
This workshop focuses on the benefits of practicing open research for you as a researcher, to improve discoverability and maximise access to your work and to raise your professional profile.
By the end of the session you will:
• Have an understanding of the principles of Open Research
• Understand open licences and how they apply to publications, data and software
• Be able to apply key tools and techniques to increase the visibility of yourself and your research, including repositories, ORCID, social media and altmetrics
• Describe the different ways of making research and data available open access
Session 1
How to implement Open Science
Antónia Correia & Pedro Principe, University of Minho
Open Access Publishing
How to implement Open Access and Open Science
What is Open Access and how to provide Open Access
Open Access in Horizon 2020: how to comply with H2020 Open Science requirements
Managing and Sharing Research Data
Open, closed and shared data
Data Management Plans
Open Data in Horizon 2020: how to comply with H2020 Open Science requirements
This presentation in intended to introduce Open Access (OA); the OA movement; OA advantages for authors, institutions and society; OA business models and publishing in OA; important tools for research and publishing; and other ‘open’ initiatives.
After an introduction to open science policy in Horizon Europe, the main focus of the presentation is open access to publications requirements in Horizon Europe and Open Research Europe for the Estonian Research Council in June 2021
This presentation was provided by Violeta Ilik of Northwestern University during the NISO Virtual Conference held on Feb 15, 2017, entitled Institutional Repositories: Ensuring Yours is Populated, Useful and Thriving. The DOI for this presentation is http://dx.doi.org/10.18131/G3VP6R
Michael Markie talks about open reserch publishing platforms | OSFair2017 Workshop
Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms
Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.
When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2
Open Science, Open Data: towards a new transparent and reproducible ecosystemLIBER Europe
Presented at the Preforma Open Source Workshop 8 April 2016
As a library membership organization, LIBER works on addressing Open Science barriers. Standardisation of file formats can really help in overcoming some of these barriers: it enables us to process and preserve data in a controlled way, it helps ensure that outputs are really open and accessible in the long term and it improves interoperability of new tools and services. Making sure data is stored in a controlled way and can be (re) used today and in the future is an important element in Open Science. We see this as not only a technical challenge but also a social one: awareness, trust and community building is needed in order to ensure uptake of these standards. Libraries therefore have a valuable role to play in the development of good research data management throughout all phases of the Open Data lifecycle.
Moving from an IR to a CRIS, the why & howDavid T Palmer
IRs collect, manage and display publications, and their metadata. However, an institution’s research, expertise and capacity is described by more than publications. The HKU Scholars Hub, hosted in DSpace, began as the IR of The University of Hong Kong (HKU) in 2005. Asking for voluntary deposit of publications from HKU academics, it received little notice, and more importantly, little support from University senior management. In 2009 a new HKU initiative, Knowledge Exchange, adopted the Hub as a key vehicle to share knowledge and skill with the community outside HKU. With funding support from the Office of KE, we extended the data model of DSpace to include relational tables on non-publication objects, including people, grants, and patents, holding attributes of these objects, such as co-investigators, co-inventors, co-prize winners, research interests, languages spoken, supervision of postgraduate theses, etc. The DSpace user interface now delivers an integrated search and display on these objects and attributes, as well as on ones newly derived, such as authority work on name disambiguation and synonymy in Roman and Hanzi (漢字), visualizations on networks of co-authors, co-investigators, etc, metrics extracted from external sources such as Scopus, WoS, PubMed, Google Scholar Citations, internal alt-metrics of view and download counts, and more. Beyond the functions of an IR, the Hub now performs as a system for reputation management, impact management, and research networking and profiling -- all of which are concepts included in the broad term, “Current Research Information System” (CRIS). These new objects and attributes curated from several trusted sources, and integrated into the present mashup, contextualize and highlight HKU research, and attract more hits, than an IR with only publications.
The HKU Office of Knowledge Exchange has now funded the modularization of these new HKU features of DSpace. Together with our partner, CINECA of Italy, we are making this work available in open source for the DSpace community.
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
Maryann Martone, Ph.D., Professor of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego
A summary of the key elements of the Horizon Europe open science policy and a detailed presentation of the European Commission's open access publishing platform, Open Research Europe
Slides prepared for the "Horizon Europe Train-the-trainer workshop" held during the 2021 Open Science Fair.
Slide 5 is a revision of the slide that was presented during the event
Intervento di Enrica Salvatori e Gianni Bergamaschi a "I santi internauti", Seminario permanente "I santi internauti" organizzato da Gruppo di ricerca RECEPT - Laboratorio di Storia Religioni e Antropologia - sez. ReCMed
In collaborazione con AISSCA - Associazione Italiana per lo Studio della Santità, dei Culti e dell'Agiografia
Intervento a Umanisti 2.0. Come ideare e gestire un progetto di ricerca nell’era digitale
Il 16 dicembre 2021 - 14:30 a Roma Tre Dip. di Studi Umanistici
Giovedì 16 dicembre 2021, 14.30-18.00, Aula Radiciotti e in streaming
Keynote inaugurale dei Seminari SISSCO Nuove frontiere della Public and Digital History (martedì 23 novembre 2021)
Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Culturali - UniMoRe - Modena
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Data and Research Infrastructures and Open Science
1. @openaire_eu
Data and Research Infrastructures
and Open Science
Emma Lazzeri and Paolo Manghi
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Pisa
4. Terminology
e-Infrastructure
The set of ICT services and tools adopted by a research
community in order to carry out its research activities
Data e-infrastructure
“e-Infrastructure” offering services for collection,
deposition, storage, preservation, access, retrieval,
analysis/mining/processing, publication, etc.
Research infrastructure
“System of systems” supporting research communities
with policies, practices, logistics, people, support, and
ICT services for carrying out science
5. Enable better science by
• …building together a common vision of science and facilitating this process
e.g. standards, best practices, policies
• …allowing (groups of) scientists of the same community to seamlessly
share and re-use their resources
e.g. datasets, methods, algorithms, services, hardware
• …applying economy of scale models to access resources scientists (or
organizations) alone could not afford
• …constructing new resources as combinations of other shared resources
e.g. workflow as combination of services, new datasets from feeding a service
with another dataset
Research Infrastructures
Optimal features
6. e-infrastructures: an high-level architecture
Resource registration
Resource discovery and access
Combining resources: e.g. workflows, dynamic deployment
Virtual Research Environments
Adminandoperation
Community Resources of research Groups/Local infrastructures
System
provided
resources
Community
shared
resources
Degrees of
resource
reuse
Resource catalogue
Interoperability: data formats, metadata formats, APIs (standards and best practices)
8. Recognizing the need of and factually converging to a common
understanding of the experimental scientific cycle within the
community
Interoperation
Standards/best practices for describing datasets
Standards/best practices for exposing processes for re-use
Standards/best practices for combining processes and datasets into
workflows
Benefits: community building
10. • Scholarly communication is nowadays completely in the hand of big
Commerical Publishers’ interests and old-fashioned and outdated research
evaluation criteria: research results are closed behind paywalls and subscriptions
that noone can afford (doctors, professionists, SME,…)
• Each Institution pays the research it produces 4 times: salary, research fundings,
scientific journal subscription to re-buy the research results of its and re-use rights.
• All this is paid with public money; Single institutions spend millions of euros each
year are for scientific journal subscriptions (instead of being use to do research)
• And do not forget that neither authors and reviewers are paid for the work they do
to write/revise a scientific article!
Why do we need Open Science?
12. Estimation:10 Billions Dollars
used for journal subscriptions
That is the money Institutions pay to
re-buy the article their own
researchers write!
Schimmer,R.,Geschuhn,K.K.,&Vogler,A.(2015).Disrupting
thesubscriptionjournals’businessmodelforthenecessary
large-scaletransformationtoopenaccess.doi:10.17617/1.3.
13. • Open Science means to open each step of research
• Open Science principles are transparency, riproducibility, collaboration,
inclusiveness, accessibility, accuracy, re-use
• Open Science steps from the concept that the reseach that is funded with public
money has to be made available immediately to the community: «»La scienza
aperta si basa anche sull’idea che la ricerca finanziata con fondi pubblici
debba essere pubblicamente disponibile: “every EU citizen has the right to
access and benefit from knowledge produced using public funds” [Neelie Kroes,
European Commission]
• The European Commission made a clear choice towards Open Science
Open Science: Science the correct way!
14. Open Science means a broader access to publicly funded research
results and therefore helps to:
• build on previous research results (improved quality of results)
• encourage collaboration and avoid duplication of effort (greater
efficiency)
• speed up innovation (faster progress to market means faster growth)
• involve citizens and society (improved transparency of the scientific
process).
Open Science: i vantaggi
16. OPEN ACCESS
One of the Pillars of Open
Science is
To Scientific Publications and
Research Data
17. Open Access
«providing online access to
scientific information (literature
and data) that is free of charge to
the end-user and reusable»
Dati,ricerca,territorio:ledifferentiprospettivedelpatrimonioculturale.
Benicomuniperl’Europadelfuturo
|Genova|22novembre2018
18. • There are two ways of implementing Open Access to Scientific Literature:
• Green Open Acces: the author, or a representative, archives (deposits) the
published article or the final peer-reviewed manuscript in an online open
repository before, at the same time as, or after publication. Some publishers
request that open access be granted only after an embargo period has elapsed.
• Gold Open Access: an article is immediately published in open access mode.
In this model, the payment of publication costs is shifted away from subscribing
readers; 26% of OA Journals ask for APC (Article Processing Charges) to cover
editorial expenses.
• To guarantee the reuse of reseearch results, authors may apply open Licenses to
the deposited version (eg. Creative Commons, which have 4 criteria: BY, SA, NC,
ND)
Open Access to Scientific Literature
19. • Possible Article Versions:
• PRE-PRINT: your final draft, as it was submitted to the editor (this version does not contain any revision from either
Editor or Revieweers)
• POST-PRINT or ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT: it is the final version, including the Reviewers comments, which
has the same contents of the article published in the Journal, but does not contain the publisher editing (Journal
name, volume, number, etc). It is the last version you sent to the editor befor getting an Acceptance notice for
publication.
• EDITORIAL or PUBLISHED VERSION: it is the version published by the editor and includes publishing
information and editing (Journal name, volume, number, etc).
• To learn which is the version you can deposit in green open access in your repository, check the
SHERPA-RoMEO database.
• To find an Open Access Journal and learn about the applied APC (Article Processing Charges)
check DOAJ, Directory of Open Access Journals
Deposit in Literature Repository
20. By depositing your articles you allow:
• Free access to knowledge
• Text e data mining, important tools to enhance access to knowledge.
• Public, Open and Transparent tools to knowledge discovery
• Unpaywall (this tool allows to identify an OA version of the paper you are viewing in CrossRef),
OpenAIRE (discovers and monitors research impact, links research results to project fundings)
• Free access to information for Industry
• SMEs can have access to research results (and can accelerate the time to market by up to two years!)
• Science accelerator: publioshing your results as pre-print, promotes open peer review, and
accellerates technical publishing period.
• Publish faster & Access faster
Open Access: mandate, ethics or advantage for
research?
21. • DEPOSIT:
• Data needs to be deposited in a «trusted» repository
• Prefer thematic and discipline specific repository
• DOI or persistent identifiers are needed
• Include rich metadata description relying on Community Standards if available.
• OPEN ACCESS: data needs to be OPEN
• You can select an embargo period depending on project needs.
• You have to associate a Creative Commons Licence as open as possible to allow re-use: CC0 or CC-BY
• DOCUMENTATION: authors should provide information via the chosen repository about the tools
available to the beneficiaries that are needed to validate the results, e.g. specialised software or
software code, algorithms and analysis protocols. Where possible, they should provide these
instruments themselves.
Open Access to Research Data
23. • Publishing Software as a product of science
Citable (attribution)
Re-usable
For reproducibility of science (SoftwareHeritage)
• Software Citation Principles (FORCE11)
FAIR software
Open Access to Research Software
24. Benefit for researchers: simple rules
Open Access publications get FASTER
and MORE citations (availability of
articles)
Publication with related datasets get
FASTER and MORE citations (reliability of
research)
Published resarch data bring MORE
citations to the related articles (re-use of
data brings citation to the article)
26. The decision on whether to publish through open access must come after
the more general decision on whether to publish directly or to first seek
protection.
All H2020 Beneficiaries
Guidelines to the Rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications and
Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020
27. @openaire_eu
EC Open Access Mandate to Scientific
Publications
• Open by mandate: each beneficiary must ensure open
access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications relating
to its results.
Embargo period: at most 6 months (12 months for publications in the social sciences
and humanities).
• What to Deposit?
• Post Print or Editorial Version (machine-readable electronic copy)
• Metadata must contain project coordination (name of the action, acronym and
grant number)
• Where to Deposit?
• A repository that is compliant to OpenAIRE guidelines
Open by
mandate
28. @openaire_eu
EC Open Access Mandate to
Research Data
• Open by default (“Opt Out” always possible)
• What to Deposit
• the 'underlying data' (the data needed to validate the results presented in
scientific publications) as soon as possible. Any other data as specified
and within the deadlines laid down in the DMP
• Associated Metadata with reference to project fundings
• Where to Deposit?
• In an OpenAIRE compliant Data Repository
• What Else?
• Data Management Plan
As Open As Possible
As Closed As Necessary
29. Be Aware of Possible
Sanctions!
Grant Reductions or
Payment Suspension
[Art. 43 of the Annotated
Grant Agreement]
30.
31. 2007
2020OpenAIRE OpenAIREplus OpenAIRE2020 OpenAIRE-Advance
Sept 2018: Non-Profit Legal Entity
Services in support of Open Science publishing
Networking infra
35 National Open Access
Desks (EU Members and
Associated countries)
12 «Research Community
Open Science Desks»
Technical Infra
17 services for
publishing, discovery,
and monitoring
Research
communities
Researchers (All)
Content providers
Innovators (SMEs)
Research managers
Funders
37. Open Science publishing principles and waivers
Research
data
Research
Software
e-infra Tools &
Services
Research
data
Scientific process
Research literature:
Articles, docs, white papers
Open Science
Publishing
01101010
01100001
11010010
01101010
01100001
11010010
Scholarly Communication InfrastructureResearch Infrastructures
Publishing of all kinds of research
products and semantic links in
between
Publishing packages of
products to enable
reproducibility
Publishing an up-to-date record
of research products metadata
and links
Enabling
transparent
evaluation
Enabling
reproducibility
38. Open Science publishing vision
Research
data
Research
Software
e-infra Tools &
Services
Research
data
Scientific process
Research literature:
Articles, docs, white papers
01101010
01100001
11010010
01101010
01100001
11010010
Scholarly Communication Infrastructure
Repeat, Reproduce,
Reuse, Evaluate
Research Infrastructure
Literature
Repository
01101010
01100001
11010010
Data
Repository
Software
Repository
01101010
01100001
11010010
01101010
01100001
11010010
Package
Repository
citation
Other products:
methods, workflows,
protocols
Scientists and RI services
Continuous Publishing
partOf
partOf
Provenance: e.g. created by
39. Open Science publishing
Transparency and reproducibility
Research Infrastructures Scholarly Communication
infrastructure
Dataset
Method
Thematic
Service
Dataset
Experiment Publishing
the experiment
Input
Dataset
Input
Method
Output
Dataset
Experiment product
Thematic Service
Parameters
Experiment repo
Research data,
Software,
Workflows,
Publications
Data repo
Method repo
Publications
40. • Easy sharing and
dissemination of results
• Re-use of processes
Benefits: better science
Repeat
“same research
activity, same
laboratory”
Replicate
“same research
activity, different
laboratory”
Reproduce
“same research
activity, different
input parameters”
Re-use
“using a product of a
research activity into
another research
activity”
43. EOSC services in support of Scientific Workflows
A View from the Moon
Compute Networking
Sharing & Discovery
Management, Processing
& Analysis
Security&Identity
Training&Support
Storage
Resource provision services
Services in support of Scientific Workflows
EOSCmanagement
44. EOSC single sign-on
EOSC catalogues of services
EOSC MarketPlace
EOSC portal
Designing and building services in support of
EOSC management and identity
46. OpenAccess
Repository
ARepository archives theOpen Access
digitalobjectsandmakesthem available
anddownloadable,itisaccessibleand
interoperableviaOAI-PMHprotocoland
adoptsalong term preservation policy
Where to Deposit?
Directory of Open Access
Repository:
www.opendoar.org
Institutional
Thematic
https://arpi.unipi.it/
47. • DEPOSIT: data must be deposited in a «trusted» repository
• Zenodo is perfect as it is directly connected (and developed in cooperation with) OpenAIRE
• Better to use a discipline/thematic repository if available and recognised bv your community
• Search Re3data (www.re3data.org) to find the repository for your discipline
• Write rich metadata possibly relying on your discipline standards (if available)
• OPEN ACCESS
• Data must be FAIR!!
• DOCUMENTATION
• Information about how the dataset was created and how it can be reused should be included
Open Access to Research Data