The document outlines the modeling work for the upstream suburban Philadelphia sub-watershed cluster, focusing on stormwater management and water quality using various models such as HEC and SWMM. It details the project's funding, types of models utilized, and specific activities planned for watershed evaluation. The goal is to enhance existing models and inform decision-making for effective stormwater control measures across various sub-watershed areas.

1. Upstream Suburban Philadelphia Sub-watershed Cluster
Modeling Overview
October 21, 2014
Robert J. Ryan, PhD., P.E.
CEE Department
Temple University
Jeffrey Featherstone, PhD.
Center for Sustainable Communities
Temple University
Richard K. Fromuth, P.E.
Center for Sustainable Communities
Temple University

2. Presentation Format
 Modeling Basics
 Role of the modeling work
 Specific Models for this study
*HEC (Corps)
*SWMM (EPA)
 Questions

3. Modeling Basics
 Models are used to represent a process or
operation with equations and data.
 They allow for experiments and comparisons
to predict outcomes.
 They can inform decision making and reduce
costs.
 Models are used in stormwater management and
water quality analysis.

4. Role of the Modeling Work
 Modeling is a component of the Implementation
Plan for the Upstream Suburban Philadelphia
Sub-Watershed Cluster.
 Phase 1 of this work has been funded by the
William Penn Foundation and includes modeling
for the Tookany, Pennypack Headwaters, Wissahickon
Headwaters, and Sandy Run sub-watersheds.
 Modeling is a means to evaluate the effectiveness
of stormwater control measures individually and
collectively for sub-watersheds.

5. Types of Models for Watersheds
 Hydrologic Models
Rate, Volume, and timing of runoff
 Hydraulic Models
Water elevation for a given flow rate
 Water Quality Models
Loadings and concentrations of substances
 Models can be for discrete events or can be
continuous

6. Modeling and Scale
 Models are developed at different scales depending
on the application.
 In the Philadelphia Region, existing watershed
models for stormwater planning have been
developed for areas larger than 10 square miles.
 These models generally do not have detailed
representation for stormwater control measures.
 This work will consider modeling at both the
sub-watershed (Temple) and project site scales.
(Villanova)

7. Wissahickon Headwaters
HEC-HMS 2012
Pennypack Headwaters
HEC-HMS 2010
HEC-RAS 2007
Sandy Run
HEC-HMS 2012
HEC-RAS 2008
Poquessing Creek- Phase 2
SWMM 2012
East Branch Indian Creek- Phase 2
HEC-HMS 2005
Tookany
SWMM 2007
Existing Models for Cluster Watersheds

8. Specific Models In This Study
Phase 1
 Tookany – SWMM 2007 (EPA)
 Pennypack Headwaters – HEC-HMS 2010 (CORPS)
HEC-RAS 2007
 Sandy Run – HEC-HMS 2010, HEC-RAS 2008
 Wissahickon Headwaters – HEC-HMS 2012
 Project Scale Modeling – HYDRUS (IGWMC)
Phase 2
 Cobbs Creek – HEC-HMS 2005
 Poquessing Creek – SWMM 2012
 Wissahickon Creek – HEC-HMS

9. Modeling activities in study contract with
William Penn Foundation
 Enhance LIDAR Terrain Data for the Tookany and
Wissahickon Headwaters
 Begin development of a HEC-RAS model for the
Wissahickon Headwaters
 Collect detention basin data and refine model
representation for each sub-watershed scale model with
more detailed data for detention basins with 1 or more
acre-ft of storage.
 Perform an obstruction survey for the Tookany watershed
and improve hydraulic modeling.
 Refine sub-watershed model capabilities using monitoring
results and results of Villanova’s project scale modeling.

10. 10
• Pennypack TIN
(Triangulated
Irregular
Network)
• 2 ft resolution

11. 2 ft resolution
Sandy Run TIN

13. HEC –HMS
Hydrologic Model
Flow Rates
Runoff Volume
Timing
Developed by US Army
Corps of Engineers
HEC :
Hydrologic Engineering
Center
Latest Version
December 2013
http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/features.aspx

14. HEC - RAS
Hydaulic Model
Water Elevations
Developed by US Army
Corps of Engineers
HEC :
Hydrologic Engineering
Center
Latest Version
January 2010

15. Data Requirements:
 Obstruction Dimensions
 Obstruction Elevations
 Photographs with Scale
 Terrain Data
 Cross Section Geometry
 Ortho
 Roughness Coefficients
 Flow Rates
http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documentation.aspx

16. 16
New Ortho-Photo

17. 17
2 Feet Contour Data

18. Photo of Maple Avenue flooding provided by Whitpain Township
Model Output:
 Water Surface Elevations at
all cross sections
Provides basis for flood mapping

19. Recent HEC-RAS Models in Cluster Watersheds
Sandy Run 2008
Pennypack 2007
Ambler Tributaries
2014

21. SWMM
• StormWater Management Model v 5.1
– Updated as of May 2014
• EPA supported
• Highly flexible, Open Source
• Combines
– Hydrology
• Rainfall
• Subcatchment Runoff
– Hydraulics
• Structures (storage units, SMCs)
• Conduits (pipes and open channels)
– Water Quality
• TSS, Nutrients, Bacteria, etc

22. SWMM
• Hydraulics: LID Controls (aka Stormwater Control
Measures)
– Rain gardens
– Green roofs
– Infiltration trenches
– Porous Pavement
– Rain barrels
– Vegetated Swales

23. SWMM
• Hydraulics: LID Controls (aka Stormwater Control
Measures)
– Rain gardens
– Green roofs
– Infiltration trenches
– Porous Pavement
– Rain barrels
– Vegetated Swales
Surface characteristics
Pavement characteristics
Soil characteristics
Storage characteristics
Drainage Mat characteristics
Underdrain characteristics

24. SWMM
• Water Quality
– TSS
– Nutrients
– Bacteria
– Metals
– Others

25. SWMM
• CONCLUSION
– SWMM can model
• Rainfall
• Subcatchment Runoff
• Channel and Pipe Flow
• LID Control/SCM performance
• Water Quality

26. CONTACTS
Center for Sustainable Communities
Temple University Ambler
580 Meetinghouse Rd, Ambler, PA 19002
http://www.csc.temple.edu
E-mail: jeffrey.featherstone@temple.edu
rjryan@temple.edu
richard.fromuth@temple.edu