These are simple tools to help stop power abuse in the workplace and in the process create an environment where people feel safe to speak up and speak out.
This document discusses the culture of fear, conformity, and power abuse that can exist in organizations. It notes how people may feel they must acquiesce to authority, avoid asking questions, and conform for fear of being abused, getting in trouble, or losing their job. Various tools of power abuse are listed, such as browbeating, intimidation, humiliation, and gaslighting. The document proposes using tools like agreeing to disagree respectfully, objecting to behaviors politely, and having peers intervene to resolve issues and prevent the need for human resources or firings. It argues such psychological safety practices should become mandatory in the workplace.
These are simple tools to help stop power abuse in the workplace and in the process create an environment where people feel safe to speak up and speak out.
This document discusses the culture of fear, conformity, and power abuse that can exist in organizations. It notes how people may feel they must acquiesce to authority, avoid asking questions, and conform for fear of being abused, getting in trouble, or losing their job. Various tools of power abuse are listed, such as browbeating, intimidation, humiliation, and gaslighting. The document proposes using tools like agreeing to disagree respectfully, objecting to behaviors politely, and having peers intervene to resolve issues and prevent the need for human resources or firings. It argues such psychological safety practices should become mandatory in the workplace.
Object123 is a workplace Social Just Culture that encourages team members to object to misbehavior, in real-time rather than suppress it & backbite the offender later
What is the difference between objecting & disagreeing? So, objecting is sort of a meta disagreement ie. we disagree with how we disagree.
“I simply object on the grounds that you raised your tone & volume when we disagreed “
This is an explainer for the Object123 tool that we use in our organization when one person is offended by the other person's behavior. It's how we behave!
This document discusses issues that can arise in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence to authority, and creating a culture of walking on eggshells where people are uncomfortable asking questions. It proposes a tool called Object123 that can help split disagreements, address how things are said rather than just the content, and allow peers to resolve issues rather than involving HR. The tool aims to add safety to discussions to avoid exhausting reading and workshops, and allow organizations to reach their potential without people feeling they have to walk on eggshells.
This document contains survey results from horror film fans. It includes charts showing the age ranges and gender of respondents, as well as their preferences for different horror styles, important attributes in horror films, and ratings of horror film posters. The majority of respondents were between 26 and 40 years old, slightly more were male than female, and suspense and likeable villains were the most important attributes when choosing a horror film to watch.
The document contains 4 charts that provide demographic data and preferences around horror films and genres. The first chart shows the age distribution of respondents, with the largest groups being 40-55 and 26-40. The second chart compares responses between males and females. The third and fourth charts show that suspense and likeable villains are the most popular attributes in horror films, followed by deaths and jump scares, while gore is the least popular attribute.
The document contains several charts and graphs about preferences for horror films and genres. A bar graph shows that most respondents were between ages 40-55, with the next largest groups being 26-40 and over 55. Another bar graph indicates that slightly more male respondents than female completed the survey. A pie chart shows that suspense was the most liked attribute in horror films, followed by likeable villains and jump scares.
Object123 Simple tools to help stop power abuse in the workplaceDesmond Sherlock
This document discusses power abuse and conformity in organizations. It notes that organizations often have gossiping, acquiescing to authority without question, and sycophantic behaviors due to fears of abuse, being fired unfairly, or facing difficult conversations. The document suggests that psychological safety in the workplace should be mandatory like occupational health and safety. It proposes using simple tools like yellow and red cards to call out offensive behaviors, and allowing peers to resolve disputes if issues remain unresolved, in order to stop power abuse and help people feel comfortable speaking up.
Object123 is a workplace behavior toolkit where we object to misbehavior in real-time thus nipping any potential for long-term conflicts or disputes in the bud.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It notes organizations can look like places where people are walking on eggshells and failing to ask questions due to discomfort. The document proposes using "stop buttons" so that when people feel offended, they can object in real-time to misbehaviors by the offender, such as the use of absolute language, blaming, intimidation, ignoring people, or sarcasm. If issues remain unresolved, peers would make a decision rather than involving HR. The goal is to reduce discomfort and restrictions on behaviors.
This document discusses preferences and expectations for thriller movies and openings/trailers. It asks questions about gender, favorite nursery rhymes and thriller movies, preferences for gory vs spooky content, expected lighting, and what makes thrillers appealing. It also lists elements that could be included in a thriller opening/trailer like characters, music, setting, antagonist, story hints, suspense, and more. Music preferences for openings are discussed, focusing on creepy instrumental music to build tension and anticipation.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It suggests organizations look this way because people are uncomfortable asking "dumb questions" and fail to object to inappropriate behaviors for fear of retaliation. It then provides examples of problematic behaviors used by offenders, such as browbeating and coercive tactics, and examples of how offended parties remain silent through implicit submission. Finally, it proposes using a "stop button" where anyone can pause a disagreement when feeling offended or uncomfortable with how it is being discussed, in order to establish psychological safety in the workplace.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It suggests organizations look this way because people are uncomfortable asking "dumb questions" and fail to object to inappropriate behaviors for fear of retaliation. The document then provides examples of problematic behaviors used by offenders, such as browbeating and intimidation, and responses commonly used by offended parties, such as ignoring problems or thinking issues aren't worth addressing. It proposes using a "stop button" where anyone can object in the moment to inappropriate behaviors, and having peers resolve disputes rather than human resources. The goal is to establish psychological safety so people can freely address problems without fear.
The document discusses how fear and the desire to avoid conflict or offending others can lead organizations to develop cultures of acquiescence, conformity, and politeness at the expense of open communication. It introduces an "Object123" tool that is proposed to help address this by providing a standardized way for individuals to object to misbehavior or offensive content while separating the message from the messenger. The tool is presented as a potential means of increasing psychological safety in the workplace by reducing fears of speaking up or causing discomfort.
The document discusses how fear of offending others or getting in trouble leads organizations to have sycophantic cultures where people acquiesce to authority and conform rather than ask questions. It introduces Object123 as a simple tool to help address this by allowing people to split disagreements into objections to the content versus the delivery, and to notify the offender of misbehavior using "! ! !". If issues remain unresolved, peers can decide rather than HR. The goal is to make psychological safety mandatory like occupational safety, so that abuse can be stopped through use of simple tools rather than endless workshops and readings.
The document discusses creating a tool to address misbehavior in the workplace. It suggests empowering employees to "escalate, escalate, escalate" when offended by a coworker's behavior, and if issues remain unresolved, allowing peers to vote to "sack" or remove the offending employee. It also quotes a comment praising the idea of democratizing organizational power like political power, so employees can directly vote people out. The overall message is that giving employees a direct way to address misbehavior through escalation and voting could reduce discomfort and the need to "walk on eggshells" at work.
The document discusses creating psychological safety in organizations by addressing inappropriate behaviors and establishing clear protocols for objecting to how disagreements are expressed. It suggests organizations should split disagreements into objecting to content versus objecting to how content is discussed. When someone is offended by another's behavior, they have options to express caution, objection, or stopping the behavior. If issues remain unresolved, peers can make a decision, rather than HR or management. The goal is to empower individuals and democratize power so people are not afraid to speak up when others misbehave.
Object123 - How we should behave when we misbehave Desmond Sherlock
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It notes that organizations encourage sycophantic behaviors where people are uncomfortable and fail to ask questions. The document then lists problematic behaviors like bullying, blaming, intimidation, sarcasm, and threats. It suggests using "stop-the-line" buttons to object to such misbehaviors in real-time. If issues remain unresolved, peers could decide consequences like "sacking" the offender, rather than involving HR or management. The goal is to give people tools to address misbehaviors and stop walking on eggshells.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It notes organizations can look like places where people are walking on eggshells and failing to ask questions due to discomfort. The document proposes using "stop-the-line conversations" when people feel offended to remove misbehaviors by the offender such as blaming, bullying, ignoring, threatening, or sarcasm. It suggests resolving issues between the two parties or having peers decide if still unresolved, rather than involving HR. The goal is to establish psychological safety so people can disagree without misbehavior and not feel they must walk on eggshells.
Object123 is a workplace Social Just Culture that encourages team members to object to misbehavior, in real-time rather than suppress it & backbite the offender later
What is the difference between objecting & disagreeing? So, objecting is sort of a meta disagreement ie. we disagree with how we disagree.
“I simply object on the grounds that you raised your tone & volume when we disagreed “
This is an explainer for the Object123 tool that we use in our organization when one person is offended by the other person's behavior. It's how we behave!
This document discusses issues that can arise in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence to authority, and creating a culture of walking on eggshells where people are uncomfortable asking questions. It proposes a tool called Object123 that can help split disagreements, address how things are said rather than just the content, and allow peers to resolve issues rather than involving HR. The tool aims to add safety to discussions to avoid exhausting reading and workshops, and allow organizations to reach their potential without people feeling they have to walk on eggshells.
This document contains survey results from horror film fans. It includes charts showing the age ranges and gender of respondents, as well as their preferences for different horror styles, important attributes in horror films, and ratings of horror film posters. The majority of respondents were between 26 and 40 years old, slightly more were male than female, and suspense and likeable villains were the most important attributes when choosing a horror film to watch.
The document contains 4 charts that provide demographic data and preferences around horror films and genres. The first chart shows the age distribution of respondents, with the largest groups being 40-55 and 26-40. The second chart compares responses between males and females. The third and fourth charts show that suspense and likeable villains are the most popular attributes in horror films, followed by deaths and jump scares, while gore is the least popular attribute.
The document contains several charts and graphs about preferences for horror films and genres. A bar graph shows that most respondents were between ages 40-55, with the next largest groups being 26-40 and over 55. Another bar graph indicates that slightly more male respondents than female completed the survey. A pie chart shows that suspense was the most liked attribute in horror films, followed by likeable villains and jump scares.
Object123 Simple tools to help stop power abuse in the workplaceDesmond Sherlock
This document discusses power abuse and conformity in organizations. It notes that organizations often have gossiping, acquiescing to authority without question, and sycophantic behaviors due to fears of abuse, being fired unfairly, or facing difficult conversations. The document suggests that psychological safety in the workplace should be mandatory like occupational health and safety. It proposes using simple tools like yellow and red cards to call out offensive behaviors, and allowing peers to resolve disputes if issues remain unresolved, in order to stop power abuse and help people feel comfortable speaking up.
Object123 is a workplace behavior toolkit where we object to misbehavior in real-time thus nipping any potential for long-term conflicts or disputes in the bud.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It notes organizations can look like places where people are walking on eggshells and failing to ask questions due to discomfort. The document proposes using "stop buttons" so that when people feel offended, they can object in real-time to misbehaviors by the offender, such as the use of absolute language, blaming, intimidation, ignoring people, or sarcasm. If issues remain unresolved, peers would make a decision rather than involving HR. The goal is to reduce discomfort and restrictions on behaviors.
This document discusses preferences and expectations for thriller movies and openings/trailers. It asks questions about gender, favorite nursery rhymes and thriller movies, preferences for gory vs spooky content, expected lighting, and what makes thrillers appealing. It also lists elements that could be included in a thriller opening/trailer like characters, music, setting, antagonist, story hints, suspense, and more. Music preferences for openings are discussed, focusing on creepy instrumental music to build tension and anticipation.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It suggests organizations look this way because people are uncomfortable asking "dumb questions" and fail to object to inappropriate behaviors for fear of retaliation. It then provides examples of problematic behaviors used by offenders, such as browbeating and coercive tactics, and examples of how offended parties remain silent through implicit submission. Finally, it proposes using a "stop button" where anyone can pause a disagreement when feeling offended or uncomfortable with how it is being discussed, in order to establish psychological safety in the workplace.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It suggests organizations look this way because people are uncomfortable asking "dumb questions" and fail to object to inappropriate behaviors for fear of retaliation. The document then provides examples of problematic behaviors used by offenders, such as browbeating and intimidation, and responses commonly used by offended parties, such as ignoring problems or thinking issues aren't worth addressing. It proposes using a "stop button" where anyone can object in the moment to inappropriate behaviors, and having peers resolve disputes rather than human resources. The goal is to establish psychological safety so people can freely address problems without fear.
The document discusses how fear and the desire to avoid conflict or offending others can lead organizations to develop cultures of acquiescence, conformity, and politeness at the expense of open communication. It introduces an "Object123" tool that is proposed to help address this by providing a standardized way for individuals to object to misbehavior or offensive content while separating the message from the messenger. The tool is presented as a potential means of increasing psychological safety in the workplace by reducing fears of speaking up or causing discomfort.
The document discusses how fear of offending others or getting in trouble leads organizations to have sycophantic cultures where people acquiesce to authority and conform rather than ask questions. It introduces Object123 as a simple tool to help address this by allowing people to split disagreements into objections to the content versus the delivery, and to notify the offender of misbehavior using "! ! !". If issues remain unresolved, peers can decide rather than HR. The goal is to make psychological safety mandatory like occupational safety, so that abuse can be stopped through use of simple tools rather than endless workshops and readings.
The document discusses creating a tool to address misbehavior in the workplace. It suggests empowering employees to "escalate, escalate, escalate" when offended by a coworker's behavior, and if issues remain unresolved, allowing peers to vote to "sack" or remove the offending employee. It also quotes a comment praising the idea of democratizing organizational power like political power, so employees can directly vote people out. The overall message is that giving employees a direct way to address misbehavior through escalation and voting could reduce discomfort and the need to "walk on eggshells" at work.
The document discusses creating psychological safety in organizations by addressing inappropriate behaviors and establishing clear protocols for objecting to how disagreements are expressed. It suggests organizations should split disagreements into objecting to content versus objecting to how content is discussed. When someone is offended by another's behavior, they have options to express caution, objection, or stopping the behavior. If issues remain unresolved, peers can make a decision, rather than HR or management. The goal is to empower individuals and democratize power so people are not afraid to speak up when others misbehave.
Object123 - How we should behave when we misbehave Desmond Sherlock
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It notes that organizations encourage sycophantic behaviors where people are uncomfortable and fail to ask questions. The document then lists problematic behaviors like bullying, blaming, intimidation, sarcasm, and threats. It suggests using "stop-the-line" buttons to object to such misbehaviors in real-time. If issues remain unresolved, peers could decide consequences like "sacking" the offender, rather than involving HR or management. The goal is to give people tools to address misbehaviors and stop walking on eggshells.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It notes organizations can look like places where people are walking on eggshells and failing to ask questions due to discomfort. The document proposes using "stop-the-line conversations" when people feel offended to remove misbehaviors by the offender such as blaming, bullying, ignoring, threatening, or sarcasm. It suggests resolving issues between the two parties or having peers decide if still unresolved, rather than involving HR. The goal is to establish psychological safety so people can disagree without misbehavior and not feel they must walk on eggshells.
This document discusses problematic behaviors in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, and conformity. It suggests organizations look this way when people feel uncomfortable asking "dumb questions" or disagreeing with authority out of a fear of offense or retaliation. The document then outlines problematic behaviors of both offenders, such as blaming and intimidation, and offended individuals, such as being too sensitive or letting issues go unaddressed. It proposes using "stop-the-line conversations" to remove misbehavior when disputes occur and having peers decide on resolutions rather than human resources. The overall message encourages establishing guidelines for respectful interactions to create a psychologically safe environment without discomfort.
This document discusses power abuse and conformity in organizations. It notes that organizations often have gossiping, acquiescing to authority without question, and sycophantic behaviors due to fears of abuse, being fired unfairly, or difficult conversations. Abuse of power takes forms like browbeating, intimidation, humiliation, gaslighting, and coercive behaviors like threatening deadlines. The document proposes using tools like referee-style cards (yellow, red) to object to offensive behaviors, and escalating unresolved issues to peers for a vote, to democratize power and stop abuse in the workplace. The goal is for psychological health and safety to become mandatory in organizations.
This document discusses issues that can arise in organizational culture such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, conformity, and creating a culture of walking on eggshells where people fear asking questions. It proposes a tool called Object123 that aims to help team members behave respectfully by allowing them to object to offensive behaviors in the moment in a constructive way and bringing in peers to resolve issues if needed, rather than going to HR. The tool is meant to add safety and structure to disagreements while avoiding exhaustion from constant training and workshops. Early feedback on the tool suggests it could help democratize organizational power and eliminate a culture of walking on eggshells.
Object123 - A Workplace Safe-space Tool, it's how we behaveDesmond Sherlock
This document discusses creating a psychologically safe workplace where people feel comfortable sharing ideas and concerns without fear of retaliation. It notes current issues like gossiping, obsequiousness, conformity and walking on eggshells out of discomfort. It then introduces Object123 as a potential tool to help resolve disagreements by separating criticisms of ideas from criticisms of individuals. With this tool, offended parties can notify the offender of issues in a non-confrontational way through emoticons. If issues remain unresolved, peers can provide input instead of involving HR. The goal is to establish safer communication norms so excessive focus on behavioral guidelines is not needed.
This document discusses issues that arise in organizations such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence, conformity, and sycophancy. It notes discomfort with asking "dumb questions" and uncertainty around knowing when one has been offensive or offended. It then profiles behaviors of offenders, which include browbeating, blaming, ignoring, threatening and coercive behaviors. It also profiles victims as being too sensitive or passive. The document introduces an organizational tool called Object123 which allows team members to disagree with offensive content or behaviors in real-time through signaling mechanisms like exclamation points. If issues remain unresolved, peers can decide outcomes rather than involving HR. Comments from experts note the opposite of psychological safety is "walking on eggs
This document discusses issues that can arise in organizational culture such as gossiping, obsequiousness, acquiescence to authority, and conformity. It notes discomfort with asking "dumb questions" and references sycophants and walking on eggshells. It proposes a workplace tool called Object123 to help establish behavioral norms and a "safe space" where people can object to how disagreements are handled in a disrespectful manner rather than the content of disagreements. It suggests using this tool could help resolve issues without involving HR and help people feel less like they are "walking on eggshells" at work.
We can’t PREVENT misbehavior; it is a given. It WILL happen, on occasion between people, especially when we disagree. We can, however, OBJECT to misbehavior in real-time, as it occurs rather than complain later.
We can’t prevent misbehavior; it is a given. It WILL happen, on occasion between people, especially when we disagree. We can, however, tackle misbehavior in real-time, as it occurs.
We can’t prevent misbehavior; it is a given. It WILL happen, on occasion between people, especially when we disagree. We can, however, stop the misbehavior in real-time, as it occurs.
We can't PREVENT misbehavior; it is a given. It WILL happen, on occasion between people, especially when we disagree. We can, however, OBJECT to misbehavior in real-time, as it occurs rather than complain later.
This document discusses improving workplace behavior by addressing both bullying and passive behaviors. It suggests identifying types of bullying misbehaviors like gossiping, intimidation, and swearing. It also notes passive behaviors in offended employees like being too sensitive or letting issues go without objection. The document proposes a tool called Object123 that allows employees to split disagreements into content and misbehavior, objecting to the latter in real-time. It advocates escalating unresolved issues to peers for a final democratic decision, rather than involving HR or management. The goal is to establish behavioral norms and give employees power to address misbehaviors, reducing passive behaviors like "walking on eggshells."
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit to resolve unfair play in teamsDesmond Sherlock
The document describes a proposed referee toolkit called SpatzAI that uses artificial intelligence to help resolve disputes and conflicts within teams in a fair manner. It analyzes team data and interactions to identify potential issues. When issues arise, it facilitates a review process with the team to achieve resolution. The goal is to create a psychologically safe environment where team members feel comfortable collaborating without fear. It also provides market sizing information, details on how the solution works, and a request for funding to further develop the minimum viable product.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit to address unfair play in teamsDesmond Sherlock
The document proposes a referee toolkit called SpatzAI to address unfair play in teams. It consists of a team charter agreement, a 3-step app with an AI agent for team data analysis, and a team review platform. The toolkit aims to create psychological safety for teams by acknowledging and resolving disputes, conflicts and issues in a protected way without fear of repercussions. It provides examples of how the toolkit could work and analyze team data, as well as the potential market size and need for such a solution given the number of technology companies and employees. Funding of $50-100k is requested to complete an MVP and pilot the solution with test groups to gather feedback.
SpatzAI - A team referee protecting bold ideas from unfair playDesmond Sherlock
This document proposes a SpatzAI Referee Toolkit to help innovative teams address unfair play and promote psychological safety. The toolkit would use a team charter, data analysis of team interactions, and a team review platform assisted by artificial intelligence. It aims to acknowledge and resolve disputes, conflicts and issues in a way that feels fair to all members. The document outlines how the toolkit works, provides example comparative data from a pilot, discusses the potential market size and need for this solution, and shares details about the founder's background and experience to demonstrate why the idea is worth investing in.
SpatzAI - A team referee protecting bold ideas from unfair playDesmond Sherlock
This document proposes a "SpatzAI Referee Toolkit" to protect psychological safety and address unfair play in innovative teams. The toolkit would include a team charter, data analysis of team interactions, and a platform for assisted review of disputes/conflicts. It aims to acknowledge issues, accept apologies, and resolve problems without fear through a trained AI model. The proposal argues this could benefit the 500,000 tech companies and 5 million employees in the US alone, with a potential market size of $120 million per year. Details are provided on the founder's background and experience, as well as initial traction through MVP development and anecdotal testing. Funding of $50-100k is requested to further develop and pilot the solution.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit protecting bold idea-sharingDesmond Sherlock
This document describes a proposed SpatzAI Referee Toolkit that aims to address unfair play and promote psychological safety in innovative teams. The toolkit would include a team charter agreement, an AI assistant to analyze team data and assist in dispute resolution, and a team review platform. It argues that unfair criticism and lack of psychological safety can lead to uncertainty and hold teams back. The proposed solution is a set of tools to acknowledge and resolve disputes, conflicts and "spats" in a fair and assisted manner. Market size and traction to date are discussed, as well as plans for an MVP pilot program and funding request.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit protecting bold idea-sharingDesmond Sherlock
This document describes a proposed SpatzAI Referee Toolkit that aims to address unfair criticism and uncertainty in innovative teams. The toolkit would include a team charter agreement, an AI assistant to analyze team data and assist in dispute resolution, and a team review platform. It would help resolve disputes, conflicts and criticisms in a constructive manner. The proposed toolkit has potential in the large market of tech companies and employees, and $50k-$100k of funding would allow developing an MVP and pilot program to test the toolkit's effectiveness.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit to protect bold idea-sharingDesmond Sherlock
This document presents a toolkit called the SpatzAI Referee Toolkit that aims to address unfair criticism and uncertainty in innovative teams. It uses a three-step process including a team charter agreement, team data analysis using an AI agent, and a team-assisted review platform. The toolkit is meant to help resolve disputes, conflicts, and criticisms in a healthy manner for technology and design companies. It has been researched for 20 years and the founder has experience in founding two successful startups. With $50-100k funding, the founder plans to complete an MVP, run a pilot program, and further develop the app and network plugins.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit to protect bold ideasDesmond Sherlock
This document describes a referee toolkit called SpatzAI that aims to address unfair play and reduce uncertainty for innovative teams. It uses a three-step process including a team charter agreement, team data analysis, and a team-assisted review platform. The toolkit standardizes disputes and conflicts using a large language model and provides feedback categorized from caution to objections. It has the potential to help the 500,000 tech companies in the US by resolving issues for teams in a fair and data-driven manner. The creator is seeking $50,000-$100,000 to further develop an MVP and pilot the toolkit.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit to protect bold ideasDesmond Sherlock
This document describes a referee toolkit called SpatzAI that aims to address unfair play and reduce uncertainty in innovative teams. It uses a three-step process including a team charter agreement, team data analysis, and a team-assisted review platform. The toolkit standardizes the referee process and utilizes a large language model to provide impartial resolutions for disputes, conflicts, and minor issues. It has the potential to help the 500,000 tech companies in the US by resolving team tensions and issues at a low monthly cost per team member. The creator is seeking funding to complete an MVP and pilot program to test the effectiveness of the SpatzAI toolkit.
SpatzAI - A Referee toolkit to resolve spats in teamsDesmond Sherlock
This document proposes the SpatzAI Referee Toolkit to help resolve unfair disputes in innovative teams. The toolkit includes a team charter agreement, an AI assistant called SpatzAI to analyze team data and assist in reviews, and a classification system for different types of disputes from minor "spats" to more serious conflicts. It details how the system would work, the potential market size and benefits. The founders are seeking $50k-$100k in funding to complete an MVP and pilot program to test the toolkit with 100 participants.
SpatsAI - A Referee toolkit to resolve spats in teamsDesmond Sherlock
This document proposes the SpatzAI Referee Toolkit to help resolve unfair disputes in innovative teams. The toolkit includes a team charter agreement, an AI assistant called SpatzAI to analyze team data and assist in reviews, and a classification system for different types of disputes from minor "spats" to more serious conflicts. It details how the system would work, the potential market size and benefits. The author is seeking $50k-$100k in funding to complete an MVP and pilot program to test the toolkit with 100 participants.
Spatz.ai for Teams - A referee toolkit for fair playDesmond Sherlock
The document describes a proposed referee toolkit called SpatzAI that aims to promote fair play and resolve disputes within innovative teams. It would include a team charter, 3-step procedure app, data analysis of team dynamics, and a review platform. The toolkit would assign "spats" or cautions to different levels of disputes and conflicts, with the goal of resolving most issues. It estimates the potential market size at $120 million per year among tech companies. The proposal requests $50,000-$100,000 in funding to complete an MVP, conduct a pilot study, and further develop the app and network integration.
Spatz.ai for Teams - A referee toolkit for unfair idea-challengesDesmond Sherlock
This document presents a referee toolkit called SpatzAI that aims to address unfair idea challenges and minor disputes within innovative teams. The toolkit employs a team charter, 3-step procedure app, and AI data analysis to analyze team dynamics and assist in resolving conflicts. It also provides a comparative data example from a pilot test showing how the toolkit helped resolve various disputes, conflicts, and minor spats within a hypothetical 100-person team over one week. The proposed solution aims to serve the 500,000 tech companies in the US with 5 million tech employees, representing a total addressable market of $120 million per year.
Spatz.ai for Teams - A referee toolkit for unfair idea-challengesDesmond Sherlock
This document describes a referee toolkit called SpatzAI that aims to address unfair challenges to ideas in teams and help resolve minor disputes. It works by having teams agree to a charter and using a 3-step app procedure along with AI data analysis of team dynamics. The toolkit would provide official cautions, objections, and stops to discourage unfair challenges and assist in resolving disputes. It has the potential to help the many tech companies and their employees avoid issues caused by the loudest voices always winning. Initial testing of an MVP has shown promise in resolving conflicts. Funding of $50-100k is requested to further develop the app and network plugin and conduct a larger pilot test.
Spatz.ai for Teams - A referee toolkit for unfair idea-challengesDesmond Sherlock
This document proposes a referee toolkit to help address unfairness and resolve disputes when challenging ideas in innovative teams. The toolkit would include a team charter, procedures app, and AI data analysis to analyze team dynamics. It would provide guidelines for acceptable challenges and apologies. An MVP has been created including branding and principles. Funding of $50k-$100k is requested to pilot the toolkit with 100 participants and further develop the app and network plugin.
SpatzAI - A referee toolkit for challenging bold ideas in teamsDesmond Sherlock
This document proposes a referee toolkit to help address unfairness and resolve disputes when challenging ideas in innovative teams. The toolkit would include a team charter, procedures app, and AI data analysis to analyze team dynamics. It would provide guidelines for acceptable challenges and apologies. An MVP has been created including branding and principles. Funding of $50k-$100k is requested to pilot the toolkit with 100 participants and further develop the app and network plugin.
SpatzAI - Powering Bold Idea-sharing in Teams Spat by SpatDesmond Sherlock
The document proposes a solution called SpatzAI Referee Toolkit to help resolve disputes and conflicts within innovative teams. The toolkit uses a team charter, 3-step procedure app, and SpatzAI data analysis to determine unfair behavior. It compares data from a pilot group of 100 members where 2659 potential disputes were resolved. The market opportunity is estimated at $120 million per year serving 500,000 tech companies. Funding of $50-100K is requested to complete an MVP and pilot with 100 participants.
SpatzAI - Powering Bold Idea-sharing in Teams Spat by SpatDesmond Sherlock
The document proposes an AI referee toolkit called Spatz to help resolve unfair behavior, disputes, conflicts and "spats" in innovative teams. The solution includes a team charter, 3-step procedure app, AI analysis of team dynamics, and assisted review platform. It provides examples of how the toolkit could resolve various issues like disputes, conflicts and spats based on comparative pilot data. The potential market size is estimated at $120 million per year given the number of tech companies and employees. Funding of $50-100k is requested to complete an MVP and pilot with 100 participants.
SpatzAI - Powering Bold Idea-sharing in Teams Spat by SpatDesmond Sherlock
The document proposes an AI referee toolkit called Spatz to help resolve disputes and conflicts within innovative teams. The toolkit would use a team charter, 3-step procedure, and app to analyze team dynamics and assist in reviewing incidents. An MVP has been created including branding, algorithms, and manual testing. The potential market is large at $120 million per year serving 500,000 tech companies. Funding of $50-100K is requested to complete the MVP, run a pilot test, and further develop the app and network plugins.
SpatzAI - Powering Bold Idea-sharing in Teams Spat by SpatDesmond Sherlock
The document proposes an AI-powered referee toolkit called SpatzAI to help assess ideas shared in teams in a fair and objective manner. It aims to address problems like some team members feeling their ideas are unfairly challenged or that the loudest voices always win. The proposed solution would create an AI system to analyze team dynamics in real-time and provide assessments to establish a more level playing field for idea sharing. It provides details on how the system would work, the target market of tech companies and employees, traction so far including an MVP, and plans for funding to further develop the product.
Designing and Sustaining Large-Scale Value-Centered Agile Ecosystems (powered...Alexey Krivitsky
Is Agile dead? It depends on what you mean by 'Agile'. If you mean that the organizations are not getting the promised benefits because they were focusing too much on the team-level agile "ways of working" instead of systemic global improvements -- then we are in agreement. It is a misunderstanding of Agility that led us down a dead-end. At Org Topologies, we see bright sparks -- the signs of the 'second wave of Agile' as we call it. The emphasis is shifting towards both in-team and inter-team collaboration. Away from false dichotomies. Both: team autonomy and shared broad product ownership are required to sustain true result-oriented organizational agility. Org Topologies is a package offering a visual language plus thinking tools required to communicate org development direction and can be used to help design and then sustain org change aiming at higher organizational archetypes.
Colby Hobson: Residential Construction Leader Building a Solid Reputation Thr...dsnow9802
Colby Hobson stands out as a dynamic leader in the residential construction industry. With a solid reputation built on his exceptional communication and presentation skills, Colby has proven himself to be an excellent team player, fostering a collaborative and efficient work environment.
A team is a group of individuals, all working together for a common purpose. This Ppt derives a detail information on team building process and ats type with effective example by Tuckmans Model. it also describes about team issues and effective team work. Unclear Roles and Responsibilities of teams as well as individuals.
Originally presented at XP2024 Bolzano
While agile has entered the post-mainstream age, possibly losing its mojo along the way, the rise of remote working is dealing a more severe blow than its industrialization.
In this talk we'll have a look to the cumulative effect of the constraints of a remote working environment and of the common countermeasures.
A presentation on mastering key management concepts across projects, products, programs, and portfolios. Whether you're an aspiring manager or looking to enhance your skills, this session will provide you with the knowledge and tools to succeed in various management roles. Learn about the distinct lifecycles, methodologies, and essential skillsets needed to thrive in today's dynamic business environment.
12 steps to transform your organization into the agile org you deservePierre E. NEIS
During an organizational transformation, the shift is from the previous state to an improved one. In the realm of agility, I emphasize the significance of identifying polarities. This approach helps establish a clear understanding of your objectives. I have outlined 12 incremental actions to delineate your organizational strategy.
Impact of Effective Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Motivation and ...Dr. Nazrul Islam
Healthy economic development requires properly managing the banking industry of any
country. Along with state-owned banks, private banks play a critical role in the country's economy.
Managers in all types of banks now confront the same challenge: how to get the utmost output from
their employees. Therefore, Performance appraisal appears to be inevitable since it set the
standard for comparing actual performance to established objectives and recommending practical
solutions that help the organization achieve sustainable growth. Therefore, the purpose of this
research is to determine the effect of performance appraisal on employee motivation and retention.
Ganpati Kumar Choudhary Indian Ethos PPT.pptx, The Dilemma of Green Energy Corporation
Green Energy Corporation, a leading renewable energy company, faces a dilemma: balancing profitability and sustainability. Pressure to scale rapidly has led to ethical concerns, as the company's commitment to sustainable practices is tested by the need to satisfy shareholders and maintain a competitive edge.
1. GOSSIPPING
OBSEQUIOUS
…why?
Why do organizations look like this?
ACQUIESENC
E
ASSENTING to authority
CONFORMITY
Politically Correct
Failing to ask “dumb questions”
Compromisin
g
SYCOPHANT
S
Walking on Eggshells
discomfort
2. Power Abuse
FEAR
• FEAR of being ABUSED
• FEAR of being ABUSIVE
• FEAR the difficult conversation (because of ABUSE)
• FEAR of getting fired or excluded unfairly (ABUSED)
“shut the f#*k up!”
….because of
of
3. The offender’s favorite TOOLS ….
Browbeating
The Offender
is Offensive… DOGMA
Blaming Rhetorical Questions
NAGGING
Volume
Tone
Intimidation
Manipulation
Steamrolling
MISLEADING
Sulking
Humiliating
GASLIGHTINGIgnoring
(silent treatment)
SARCASM
Coercion
ThreateningDEADLINES
4. SNOWFLAKE
Go with the flow
Let SLEEPING DOGS lie
Don’t ROCK the BOAT!
Don’t make WAVES!
Don’t upset the applecart
Suck it up BUTTERCUP
Have a THICK SKIN
Get OVER IT!
Don’t be a SNITCH!
The offended use of defensive TOOLS….
The Offended
is Passive…
So SENSITIVE!
5.
6. Psychological Health & Safety
Someday these tools will be
mandatory also
some day.
Occupational Health & Safety
Mandatory tools in the workplace.
Psychological Health & Safety
7. Adding safety is exhausting…
or…to remember….
Too much….
reading…. workshops….
8. or use simple tools to stop abuse…
“want to teach…
don’t bother…
give them a tool…
which leads to new
ways of thinking”
Buckminster Fuller
9. First we need to AGREE
object to
disagree
with
behavior… …in real-time
content.
10. When one feels offended simply…
The offender.. Or escalate to
like a ref’s Whistle……
“ ”
11. or escalate to
like a ref’s Whistle……Yellow Card
When one feels offended simply…
“ ” “ ”
The offender..
12. like a ref’s Whistle……Yellow Card……Red Card
When one feels offended simply…
“ ” “ ” “ ”
The offender..
14. What people are saying…
“
”
Very interesting point, Desmond.
Democratize organizational power as we do
political power, so (we) can vote people out
Timothy R. Clark
Author of The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety
15. …the sky’s the limit
…no more walking on eggshells
When we stop power abuse
Editor's Notes
1. INTRODUCTIONIn 1983 I had a run in with my boss at my first job just out of Uni and I resigned A few months later I became a borne again Christian 2 & ½ years later I was kicked out for asking too many questions
I found out later that I was slandered by the pastor of the group and had no recourse
Thus began my quest to redress these issues….
First thing I learned was that my dogma and the groups dogma was eroding learningI came up with my first premise “ I could be wrong” and began to learn.Thus began my journey of some 35 years where I was finding questions were far more powerful than dogma.And here is what I have come up with so far to dissipate organizational power that stopped me in my tracks all those years back
2. INTRODUCTION 2003 (TWENTY YEARS LATER)My brother and I agreed to form a business together to test out our psychological safety tools
After we discovered the power of an Acceptable Apology.
Since then we have been working on each other and developing our PS tools while we havebeen developing our startups.
18 years on and I think we have just about gotten our suite of
3. INTRODUCTION 2020 (TWENTY YEARS LATER)Ready to Scale test
WHY ORGANISATIONS LOOK LIKE THISWalking on eggshells it my definition of offensive. It is not painful but it is not comfortable either
Power abuse is offensive behavior…doesn’t cause actual pain
And is certainly doesn’t make us feel comfortable Why do most if not all organisations look somewhat like this?Hear a pin drop!
WHY?????
Maybe we don’t even notice it because it is so common?And we only notice when others do it to us not when we do it to them, maybe?
6. POWER ABUSE causes FEAR!
This scenario may never happen in the organization but we fear it could.
I have experienced this behavior.So what happens if you are in a meeting with the team and a leader and he or she tell you to “shut the F#*k up!”Story at Plug & Play and team leader abused one member.
Feeling offended or upset what standard recourse can you take in your workplace now?
It is obviously unacceptable behavior but it happens!This abuse or misbehavior bleeds into all of our relationships including our organisations and leadsto FEAR
1. FEAR of being offended with no standard way to redress the offense, especially if it’s the boss.1. FEAR of causing offence or saying the wrong thing3. Fear of the “difficult” conversation or “rocking the boat” and we don’t really recognize it
4. Fear of getting FIRED or EXCLUDED………
POWER ABUSE is OffensiveAs a child when we didn’t get what we wanted we would cry or scream and throw a tantrum.As we grew up we WERE SUPPOSED TO LEARN TO NAGotiate LESS & NEGotiate MORE and control our behavior so that we can get what we want, FAIRLY.But even as adults we still get angry to a degree when we don’t get what we want or when someone doesn’t agree with us.We recognize this anger as abuse of power.It comes in the form of:
…the following behaviors:These are our SHORTCUTS designed to GET us what we want at someone else’s expense.The more POWER one has the more ABUSE is possible
7. Well Worn Idioms…or do you just have to “SUCK IT UP” and put up with it?We have allowed Power Abuse to exist.The good news is we can stop it also.These abusive behaviors are not too hard to recognize but have difficult to deal with until NOW.
TOOL TO STOP TO POWER ABUSEObject123 is a tool designed to deal with these power abuses during a disagreement,by nipping in the bud, any offensive behavior, before it becomes a dispute.
8. PROVIDE PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY MANDATORY
Most developed countries have mandatory OH&S in the workplace but NOTpsychological health and safety yet. OPH&S will be the next new new thing especially for the knowledge economyhttps://www.entrepreneur.com/article/320696 6 Effective Tactics for Handling a Toxic Boss65 percent of bullied employees lost their original jobs when they tried to stop the bullying.
Psychological Safety has become the latest buzz word after google article in the NY Times 2016 about What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect TeamWhen they found the a 1999 scientific paper by Amy Edmondson on Psychological Safety and whysome teams are more successful than others.
New research reveals surprising truths about why some work groups thrive and others falter.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-perfect-team.html
Within psychology, researchers sometimes colloquially refer to traits like ‘‘conversational turn-taking’’ and ‘‘average social sensitivity’’ as aspects of what’s known as psychological safety — a group culture that the Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson defines as a ‘‘shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking.’’ Psychological safety is ‘‘a sense of confidence that the team will not embarrass, reject or punish someone for speaking up,’’ Edmondson wrote in a study published in 1999. ‘‘It describes a team climate characterized by interpersonal trust and mutual respect in which people are comfortable being themselves.’’
Just as it is the employer’s responsibility to provide a WORKPLACE SAFETY for employees.
I believe it will become incumbent upon all employers to provide Psychological Safety in the workplace?
And a provide tools to dissipate organizational power to protect their staff
9. TOO MANY BOOKS TOO MUCH TO LEARN TOO MANY SCHOOLS OF THOUGHTThese books TEACH focus on teaching teams and management psychological safety.They focus on ADDING SAFETY (not so easy to define), we focus on STOPPING ABUSE (easy to recognize and stop)Object123 is a tool TO STOP POWER ABUSESo how do we stop POWER ABUSE?
The fearless
Usually 200 pages of logical and seemingly reasonable ideasThousands of tips on how to be more emotionally intelligent.
These ideas are exhaustive and exhausting
OR…..
10. SUPPLY THE TOOLS, DON’T TEACH
We supply tools to stop or subtract abuse or offensive behavior
"If you want to teach people a new way of thinking, don’t bother trying to teach them. Instead, give them a tool, the use of which will lead to new ways of thinking.“Buckminster Fuller:
11. SPLIT DISAGREEMENTS INTO 2 Parts
What is the difference between disagreeing and objecting, anyone know?
We disagree with the content
We object to abusive behavior (we know when by being offended)
Duel conversations running in parallel and in real-time is the object of Object123
12. HOW IT WORKS – BE LESS OFFENSIVE
Object123 ensures the objections are always less offensive than the misbehavior,
That is, by simply objecting to someone’s objection. If necessary.We have simply agreed to moderate each other’s misbehavior and objections.I believe most abuse, malicious gossip, aggression and anger are just poorly delivered objections.
13. TOOL 2 = OBJECT123’S THREE SIMIPLE AGREEMENTSAgreement 1. Ref’s WhistleAgree to “Instead of retaliating when we are offended we simply offer a mild caution, in real-time explaining why we have taken offence.”
The offender simply acknowledges or challenges the offense. (ensuring the caution or objection is always less offensive than the misbehavior)Yes, this will pause the CONTENT conversation while we have the BEHAVIIOR conversation.
Yes we slow down the content conversation but ultimately........we save the potential hours lost to people’s gossiping behind each other’s backs afterAnd save on having eventual confrontations And disputes later after such offences are repeated on a number of occasions.Resulting in these examples “I’ve HAD ENOUGH!” or “I’m SICK of THIS” or even “SHUT UP” or “FUCK OFF” don’t just occur on the first offence.
14. OBJECT2 YELLOW CARDAgreement 2. Yellow Card“If we don’t get an acknowledgment or adequate explanation for the caution then we can escalate it toan Objection and now receive a simple apology.”
15. OBJECT3 RED CARDAgreement 3. Red Card“If we don’t get a simple apology or adequate explanation for the Objection then we can escalate it toa Stop and now receive an acceptable apology.”
If we still don’t get an acceptable apology or adequate explanation
The objection can be taken up to the team hearing where the team decides,
16. FINALLY – OUR PEERS VOTE PEOPLE OUT!
Thus democratising organizational power where the janitor can take the CEO before the team.Not use HR, we don’t want management investigating management like the GOP senate investigating the GOP president
17. HOW THE PROCESS WORKS - REAL CONVERSATION FOR LEARNINGWe learn from listening to the offended person’s real-time objection
We learn as the offender acknowledges or apologizes…By either retracting their offence or if escalated to a STOP then explaining what they did and why and what they will do next time (ACCEPTABLE APOLOGY)
18. WHAT PEOPLE THINKIRONYFunny story is that after I joined his Psych Safety group and asked him a question on one of his posts about what guarantee his system has of not being sacked by the boss. He said there was none and promptly blocked me from the group…so much for psychological safety….ha!
Feeling Safe means we can have all those difficult conversations AND DISAGREEMENTSand who know what we can eventually agree to? THE SKY MIGHT NOT BE THE LIMITI have decided that instead of focusing on psychological safety I would focus more on what I believe prevents it and that is abuse of power. After all, strip away power abuse and how can anyone cast any legitimate aspersions or stones for that matter, leaving us safe to do incredible things, only to receive constructive criticism for our outlandish ideas. Stepping across that red line would activate our agreed to, simple tools to help stop power abuse.
19 CONCLUSION
Finally achieve a level of psychological safety when we feel safe or safer through democratizing Organizational Power.
We don’t have to fear being fired because we dare to speak up Can share more easily any of our concerns and insights without unfounded fear of upsetting anyone or being upset.
Object123 is a step in the right direction.