Disseminating Scientific Papers via Twitter: Practical Insights and Research ...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With 230 million active users and 24 percent of the U.S. online population using the microblogging platform, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles reflect some type of interest by the general public and might even be able to measure the societal impact of research. However, early studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. At the same time, some tweets do not involve any human engagement but rather are generated automatically by Twitter bots.
This talk focuses on identifying audiences on Twitter and teaches participants how to collect, analyze, visualize, and interpret diffusion patterns of scientific articles on Twitter. The course provides an overview of Altmetrics research and present the challenges – including methods and first results – of classifying Twitter user groups, with a particular focus on identifying members of the general public and measuring societal impact. The course will provide hands-on exercises and instructions on how to analyze by whom, when, and how scientific papers are shared on Twitter.
Speaker: Stefanie Haustein, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies, University of Ottawa
AI in between online and offline discourse - and what has ChatGPT to do with ...Stefan Dietze
Talk at Bonn University on general AI and NLP challenges in the context of online discourse analysis. Specific focus on challenges arising from the widespread adoption of neural large language models.
WEBINAR: Joining the "buzz": the role of social media in raising research vi...HELIGLIASA
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility: Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics/article level metrics). Altmetrics measures aspects of the impact of a work, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media.
This webinar (based on a presentation of the same name at the LIASA conference on 24th September 2014) gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University, Grahamstown, librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution.
Presented by Eileen Shepherd, Principal Librarian, Science & Pharmacy, Rhodes University Library
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility ...Eileen Shepherd
[This presentation is based on my previous presentation, of the same title, at the LIASA 2014 conference. It was presented as a webinar for LIASA Higher Education Libraries Interest Group on 6/11/2014]
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility at Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa - HELIG Webinar presented by Eileen Shepherd
Disseminating Scientific Research via Twitter: Research Evidence and Practica...Katja Reuter, PhD
About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With nearly 69 million active U.S. Twitter users (24% of the U.S. adult population) and 328 million monthly active users worldwide, Twitter is one of the biggest social networks worldwide. Understandably, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles and research findings can reach peers and the general public. Studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. However, there are ways to reach the broader public. This webinar will provide an overview of using Twitter to reach peers and non-specialist groups, the relationship between tweets and citations, and provide tips for building an academic Twitter presence.
Speaker: Katja Reuter, PhD, Assistant Professor of Clinical Preventive Medicine at the Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research in the Department of Preventive Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC; Director of Digital Innovation and Communication for the Southern California Clinical and Translational Research Institute (SC CTSI).
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the strengths and limitations of using Twitter for the dissemination of scientific research.
2. Describe practical approaches for building an academic presence on Twitter.
3. Describe approaches to identify and reach different audiences on Twitter.
Research-Open Access-Social Media: A winning combinationEileen Shepherd
This presentation endeavours to show that social media and open access are a great couple, to provide a brief introduction to altmetrics – a non-traditional form of measuring scholarly impact and to demonstrate the use of social media in raising awareness and visibility of Rhodes University research
This document discusses how open access and social media can work together to increase the visibility and impact of academic research. It provides examples of how altmetrics, which measure scholarly impact through social media mentions and shares, can supplement traditional bibliometric measures. The presentation then demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using Twitter and blogs to promote Rhodes research outputs and raise their online visibility and visibility within relevant scholarly communities. By tagging articles with hashtags and reposting on subject-specific Twitter accounts, the library aims to increase dissemination and discovery of Rhodes University research.
Disseminating Scientific Papers via Twitter: Practical Insights and Research ...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With 230 million active users and 24 percent of the U.S. online population using the microblogging platform, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles reflect some type of interest by the general public and might even be able to measure the societal impact of research. However, early studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. At the same time, some tweets do not involve any human engagement but rather are generated automatically by Twitter bots.
This talk focuses on identifying audiences on Twitter and teaches participants how to collect, analyze, visualize, and interpret diffusion patterns of scientific articles on Twitter. The course provides an overview of Altmetrics research and present the challenges – including methods and first results – of classifying Twitter user groups, with a particular focus on identifying members of the general public and measuring societal impact. The course will provide hands-on exercises and instructions on how to analyze by whom, when, and how scientific papers are shared on Twitter.
Speaker: Stefanie Haustein, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies, University of Ottawa
AI in between online and offline discourse - and what has ChatGPT to do with ...Stefan Dietze
Talk at Bonn University on general AI and NLP challenges in the context of online discourse analysis. Specific focus on challenges arising from the widespread adoption of neural large language models.
WEBINAR: Joining the "buzz": the role of social media in raising research vi...HELIGLIASA
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility: Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics/article level metrics). Altmetrics measures aspects of the impact of a work, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media.
This webinar (based on a presentation of the same name at the LIASA conference on 24th September 2014) gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University, Grahamstown, librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution.
Presented by Eileen Shepherd, Principal Librarian, Science & Pharmacy, Rhodes University Library
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility ...Eileen Shepherd
[This presentation is based on my previous presentation, of the same title, at the LIASA 2014 conference. It was presented as a webinar for LIASA Higher Education Libraries Interest Group on 6/11/2014]
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility at Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa - HELIG Webinar presented by Eileen Shepherd
Disseminating Scientific Research via Twitter: Research Evidence and Practica...Katja Reuter, PhD
About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With nearly 69 million active U.S. Twitter users (24% of the U.S. adult population) and 328 million monthly active users worldwide, Twitter is one of the biggest social networks worldwide. Understandably, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles and research findings can reach peers and the general public. Studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. However, there are ways to reach the broader public. This webinar will provide an overview of using Twitter to reach peers and non-specialist groups, the relationship between tweets and citations, and provide tips for building an academic Twitter presence.
Speaker: Katja Reuter, PhD, Assistant Professor of Clinical Preventive Medicine at the Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research in the Department of Preventive Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC; Director of Digital Innovation and Communication for the Southern California Clinical and Translational Research Institute (SC CTSI).
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the strengths and limitations of using Twitter for the dissemination of scientific research.
2. Describe practical approaches for building an academic presence on Twitter.
3. Describe approaches to identify and reach different audiences on Twitter.
Research-Open Access-Social Media: A winning combinationEileen Shepherd
This presentation endeavours to show that social media and open access are a great couple, to provide a brief introduction to altmetrics – a non-traditional form of measuring scholarly impact and to demonstrate the use of social media in raising awareness and visibility of Rhodes University research
This document discusses how open access and social media can work together to increase the visibility and impact of academic research. It provides examples of how altmetrics, which measure scholarly impact through social media mentions and shares, can supplement traditional bibliometric measures. The presentation then demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using Twitter and blogs to promote Rhodes research outputs and raise their online visibility and visibility within relevant scholarly communities. By tagging articles with hashtags and reposting on subject-specific Twitter accounts, the library aims to increase dissemination and discovery of Rhodes University research.
OII Summer Doctoral Programme 2010: Global brain by Meyer & SchroederEric Meyer
The document discusses how technology is driving research to become more collaborative globally through distributed and networked tools. It examines several case studies where technologies enabled large-scale collaborative research projects that addressed questions too big for individual labs. These include distributed computing for particle physics, genomic studies, and proteomics. Challenges discussed include interoperability, data sharing policies, and sustaining momentum in infrastructure.
The document discusses three potential divides that may emerge in big data research: 1) between developed and developing countries, 2) between academic and commercial sector researchers, and 3) between researchers with strong computational skills versus those with less computational skills. It provides examples of methods used in different country/region contexts and notes a critique of big data research around issues like changing definitions of knowledge, misleading claims of objectivity/accuracy, and new digital divides around data access.
Being an Open Scholar in a Connected WorldStian Håklev
This document discusses the benefits of open scholarship in a connected world. It argues that open access to research articles makes information more accessible to broader audiences, including the general public and students. When data and research notes are openly shared online, it can enable unexpected reuse and collaboration. However, the current academic publishing and reward systems may not fully incentivize open scholarship. The document calls for exploring new models of peer review, metrics of impact, and ways of publishing research to make the scholarly process more transparent and collaborative.
Public engagement while you sleep? How altmetrics can help researchers broade...UoLResearchSupport
Slides from a seminar delivered for pepnet at the University of Leeds 28 Nov 2018. Thanks to Charlotte Perry-Houts for extra content:
From peer reviewed journal articles, to assorted reports and grey literature, to datasets comprising numerical, textual or multimedia files; we generate thousands of research outputs.
In this session, Kirsten Thompson (OD&PL) and Nick Sheppard (Library) will discuss strategies for increasing quality online engagement with that research. We will explore how you can use ‘alternative metrics’, more commonly known as ‘altmetrics’, to monitor such engagement. Altmetrics can help to showcase the reach of your work, supplement grant and tenure applications, identify new audiences, and connect with other researchers in your discipline.
In the age of “fake news”, academics have a responsibility to share their expertise beyond the Ivory Tower. We’ll show you how to ensure all these disparate outputs are properly curated in university repositories with a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). There will also be an opportunity to learn about and contribute to the Library led Data Management Engagement Award, a first-ever competition launched to elicit new and imaginative ideas for engaging researchers in the practices of good Research Data Management (RDM).
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work. Workshop facilitated by Kirsten Thompson and Nick Sheppard at the University of Leeds for the #PepnetLeeds network November 28th 2018.
OBJECTIVES: Translational research focuses on the bench-to-bedside information transfer process — getting the information from researchers into the hands of clinical decision makers. At the same time, researchers who manage international research collaborations could benefit from increased knowledge and awareness of online collaboration tools to support these projects. Our goal was to support both needs through building awareness and skills with online and social media.
METHODS: The Library developed a curricula targeted specifically to academic researchers focusing on collaboration technologies and online tools to support the research process. The curricula will provide instruction at three levels: gateway, bridge, and mastery tools. The goal of Level One is to persuade researchers of the utility of online social tools. To develop the program, input was solicited from researchers identified as leaders in this area as well as focus groups of students to discover which tools are already being used.
RESULTS: Training is being provided on those tools identified as most likely to engage researchers (Google Docs, Skype, online scheduling, Adobe Connect, citation sharing tools). The curricula is being delivered as workshops duplicated as podcasts and in other online media.
CONCLUSIONS: Online and social media are practical tools for supporting distance collaborations relatively inexpensively while offering the added benefit of placing selected information in online spaces that facilitate discovery and discussion with clinical care providers, thus supporting the fundamental research processes at the same time as promoting bench-to-bedside information transfer.
The proliferation of communication technologies is profoundly changing the nature of academic practice. In this presentation I describe the impact of blogging and social networking tools on the practice and dissemination of academic research across disciplinary boundaries. I suggest that the traditional notion of the university is giving way to communities of scholars who are not tied to particular institutions, and less dependent on traditional forms of dissemination and publication. The resulting ‘democratisation’ of academia is portrayed in terms of a tension between democracy and expert knowledge mediated by technology.
One prominent contemporary challenge for technologists is to understand the ongoing impact of technological change on academic communities. At The Open University, the Digital Scholarship research team is mapping the use of Twitter in order to better understand user engagement with these technologies. I will present headline findings from this research and discuss the implications for scholarly practice at the OU.
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work
Slides from workshop to pepnet (Public Engagement network) at the University of Leeds on 28th November 2018
Social Media in Science and Altmetrics - New Ways of Measuring Research Impact Christoph Lutz
Social media are becoming more and more popular in scientific communication. Scientists use them for a range of purposes, from sharing publications, to blogging about their own or others’ research, conference tweeting, interpersonal communication and online participation, for example via Q&As on academic social network sites like ResearchGate and academia.edu. Moreover, many social media platforms can be used for impact measurement via so-called altmetrics. Altmetrics capture and aggregate social media metrics such as (re)tweets, Facebook likes, Mendeley bookmarks and Wikipedia cites. They can challenge or at least complement bibliometric impact measures, like the Journal Impact Factor and the h-index, which have been criticized on various grounds. This presentation first summarizes recent studies on social media adoption in science. It then focuses on altmetrics and summarizes key findings in that domain. Finally, it gives a hands-on introduction to altmetrics by demonstrating two prominent services: Impactstory and Altmetric.com.
This document discusses a study analyzing public scientific communication on Twitter. It presents four papers by the author examining topics like the NASA Mars rover Curiosity and analyzing frames in tweets. The study used a mixed methods approach, combining content analysis of tweet samples with visualization of frames over time. Research questions focused on observing dynamic changes in non-trending topics across years. Datasets included tweets about Curiosity, phosphorus, and permafrost from 2012 and 2013. Content analysis involved coding tweets by frame, while visualization used parallel coordinates to view frame patterns day-to-day. Results showed changes in audience size, emphasis between years, and revealed additional information compared to content analysis alone.
Weller social media as research data_psm15Katrin Weller
Presentation at "Preserving Social Media" (#psm15), London, October 27th 2015.
http://dpconline.org/events/details/96-preserving-socialmedia?xref=126%3ASocialMedia15
Scholarly Communication: Tools and Strategies for Learning and Sharing in the...Heather Martin
This document discusses scholarly communication tools and strategies for learning and sharing in the social sciences. It defines scholarly communication as the system through which research is created, evaluated, disseminated, and preserved. It notes that scholarly research is typically created to further inquiry and knowledge rather than for direct financial reward. The document then discusses changes in how scholarly works are disseminated, open access, digital repositories, author rights, using social media to share ideas and collaborate, and getting started participating in scholarly communication.
The science of science (SciSci) uses large datasets and quantitative methods to study patterns in scientific research and discovery. SciSci views science as a complex network of scholars, institutions, ideas, and outputs. Recent work in SciSci has revealed universal patterns characterizing the growth and structure of science, as well as domain-specific insights. SciSci aims to develop a deeper understanding of what drives successful science in order to enhance scientific progress and address societal challenges more effectively. Key findings include that science expands through incremental combinations of existing ideas as well as rare innovative combinations, and that individual career incentives can constrain scientific exploration unless balanced by recognition for risk-taking.
1) The document discusses using social media as a tool for researchers. It outlines researchers' typical views of social media as time-consuming and irrelevant for professional use.
2) Alternative metrics and scholarly collaboration networks are presented as ways to track attention and discover content online. Examples of metrics for articles are shown.
3) The document concludes with tasks for participants to check their online profiles, consider strategic social media use, and access additional homework materials.
Evolving and emerging scholarly communication services in libraries: public a...Claire Stewart
This document provides an overview of a guest lecture about evolving scholarly communication services in libraries and their role in supporting public access compliance and assessing research impact. It discusses challenges libraries face in helping researchers comply with public access policies from funders. It also explores metrics and indicators used to measure research impact, noting limitations, and how libraries can help address this complex issue by leveraging their expertise in managing scholarly information and data.
This presentation considers the changing nature of the scholarly record and applies the findings of NMC Horizons Report Library Edition 2014 to the Claremont Colleges Library's institutional repository.
This document provides an introduction to using social media for scientists. It discusses how social media can benefit research by improving efficiency, enhancing networking, and increasing visibility and metrics. Popular tools include blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest. Maintaining an online presence allows scientists to join conversations and stay up-to-date, but requires navigating large amounts of information. Social media may transform scientific culture by enabling extended discussions.
A presentation to the World Nutrition Summit 2021 (Cape Town, March 4-6) on how low-carb activists and insulin resistance scholars can make responsible contributions through their digital voices.
Understanding Scientific and Societal Adoption and Impact of Science Through ...Stefan Dietze
Keynote on analysing scholarly discourse at Second International Workshop on Semantic Technologies and Deep Learning Models for Scientific, Technical and Legal Data SemTech4STLD, held on 26 May at ESWC2024
OII Summer Doctoral Programme 2010: Global brain by Meyer & SchroederEric Meyer
The document discusses how technology is driving research to become more collaborative globally through distributed and networked tools. It examines several case studies where technologies enabled large-scale collaborative research projects that addressed questions too big for individual labs. These include distributed computing for particle physics, genomic studies, and proteomics. Challenges discussed include interoperability, data sharing policies, and sustaining momentum in infrastructure.
The document discusses three potential divides that may emerge in big data research: 1) between developed and developing countries, 2) between academic and commercial sector researchers, and 3) between researchers with strong computational skills versus those with less computational skills. It provides examples of methods used in different country/region contexts and notes a critique of big data research around issues like changing definitions of knowledge, misleading claims of objectivity/accuracy, and new digital divides around data access.
Being an Open Scholar in a Connected WorldStian Håklev
This document discusses the benefits of open scholarship in a connected world. It argues that open access to research articles makes information more accessible to broader audiences, including the general public and students. When data and research notes are openly shared online, it can enable unexpected reuse and collaboration. However, the current academic publishing and reward systems may not fully incentivize open scholarship. The document calls for exploring new models of peer review, metrics of impact, and ways of publishing research to make the scholarly process more transparent and collaborative.
Public engagement while you sleep? How altmetrics can help researchers broade...UoLResearchSupport
Slides from a seminar delivered for pepnet at the University of Leeds 28 Nov 2018. Thanks to Charlotte Perry-Houts for extra content:
From peer reviewed journal articles, to assorted reports and grey literature, to datasets comprising numerical, textual or multimedia files; we generate thousands of research outputs.
In this session, Kirsten Thompson (OD&PL) and Nick Sheppard (Library) will discuss strategies for increasing quality online engagement with that research. We will explore how you can use ‘alternative metrics’, more commonly known as ‘altmetrics’, to monitor such engagement. Altmetrics can help to showcase the reach of your work, supplement grant and tenure applications, identify new audiences, and connect with other researchers in your discipline.
In the age of “fake news”, academics have a responsibility to share their expertise beyond the Ivory Tower. We’ll show you how to ensure all these disparate outputs are properly curated in university repositories with a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). There will also be an opportunity to learn about and contribute to the Library led Data Management Engagement Award, a first-ever competition launched to elicit new and imaginative ideas for engaging researchers in the practices of good Research Data Management (RDM).
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work. Workshop facilitated by Kirsten Thompson and Nick Sheppard at the University of Leeds for the #PepnetLeeds network November 28th 2018.
OBJECTIVES: Translational research focuses on the bench-to-bedside information transfer process — getting the information from researchers into the hands of clinical decision makers. At the same time, researchers who manage international research collaborations could benefit from increased knowledge and awareness of online collaboration tools to support these projects. Our goal was to support both needs through building awareness and skills with online and social media.
METHODS: The Library developed a curricula targeted specifically to academic researchers focusing on collaboration technologies and online tools to support the research process. The curricula will provide instruction at three levels: gateway, bridge, and mastery tools. The goal of Level One is to persuade researchers of the utility of online social tools. To develop the program, input was solicited from researchers identified as leaders in this area as well as focus groups of students to discover which tools are already being used.
RESULTS: Training is being provided on those tools identified as most likely to engage researchers (Google Docs, Skype, online scheduling, Adobe Connect, citation sharing tools). The curricula is being delivered as workshops duplicated as podcasts and in other online media.
CONCLUSIONS: Online and social media are practical tools for supporting distance collaborations relatively inexpensively while offering the added benefit of placing selected information in online spaces that facilitate discovery and discussion with clinical care providers, thus supporting the fundamental research processes at the same time as promoting bench-to-bedside information transfer.
The proliferation of communication technologies is profoundly changing the nature of academic practice. In this presentation I describe the impact of blogging and social networking tools on the practice and dissemination of academic research across disciplinary boundaries. I suggest that the traditional notion of the university is giving way to communities of scholars who are not tied to particular institutions, and less dependent on traditional forms of dissemination and publication. The resulting ‘democratisation’ of academia is portrayed in terms of a tension between democracy and expert knowledge mediated by technology.
One prominent contemporary challenge for technologists is to understand the ongoing impact of technological change on academic communities. At The Open University, the Digital Scholarship research team is mapping the use of Twitter in order to better understand user engagement with these technologies. I will present headline findings from this research and discuss the implications for scholarly practice at the OU.
How altmetrics can help researchers broaden the reach of their work
Slides from workshop to pepnet (Public Engagement network) at the University of Leeds on 28th November 2018
Social Media in Science and Altmetrics - New Ways of Measuring Research Impact Christoph Lutz
Social media are becoming more and more popular in scientific communication. Scientists use them for a range of purposes, from sharing publications, to blogging about their own or others’ research, conference tweeting, interpersonal communication and online participation, for example via Q&As on academic social network sites like ResearchGate and academia.edu. Moreover, many social media platforms can be used for impact measurement via so-called altmetrics. Altmetrics capture and aggregate social media metrics such as (re)tweets, Facebook likes, Mendeley bookmarks and Wikipedia cites. They can challenge or at least complement bibliometric impact measures, like the Journal Impact Factor and the h-index, which have been criticized on various grounds. This presentation first summarizes recent studies on social media adoption in science. It then focuses on altmetrics and summarizes key findings in that domain. Finally, it gives a hands-on introduction to altmetrics by demonstrating two prominent services: Impactstory and Altmetric.com.
This document discusses a study analyzing public scientific communication on Twitter. It presents four papers by the author examining topics like the NASA Mars rover Curiosity and analyzing frames in tweets. The study used a mixed methods approach, combining content analysis of tweet samples with visualization of frames over time. Research questions focused on observing dynamic changes in non-trending topics across years. Datasets included tweets about Curiosity, phosphorus, and permafrost from 2012 and 2013. Content analysis involved coding tweets by frame, while visualization used parallel coordinates to view frame patterns day-to-day. Results showed changes in audience size, emphasis between years, and revealed additional information compared to content analysis alone.
Weller social media as research data_psm15Katrin Weller
Presentation at "Preserving Social Media" (#psm15), London, October 27th 2015.
http://dpconline.org/events/details/96-preserving-socialmedia?xref=126%3ASocialMedia15
Scholarly Communication: Tools and Strategies for Learning and Sharing in the...Heather Martin
This document discusses scholarly communication tools and strategies for learning and sharing in the social sciences. It defines scholarly communication as the system through which research is created, evaluated, disseminated, and preserved. It notes that scholarly research is typically created to further inquiry and knowledge rather than for direct financial reward. The document then discusses changes in how scholarly works are disseminated, open access, digital repositories, author rights, using social media to share ideas and collaborate, and getting started participating in scholarly communication.
The science of science (SciSci) uses large datasets and quantitative methods to study patterns in scientific research and discovery. SciSci views science as a complex network of scholars, institutions, ideas, and outputs. Recent work in SciSci has revealed universal patterns characterizing the growth and structure of science, as well as domain-specific insights. SciSci aims to develop a deeper understanding of what drives successful science in order to enhance scientific progress and address societal challenges more effectively. Key findings include that science expands through incremental combinations of existing ideas as well as rare innovative combinations, and that individual career incentives can constrain scientific exploration unless balanced by recognition for risk-taking.
1) The document discusses using social media as a tool for researchers. It outlines researchers' typical views of social media as time-consuming and irrelevant for professional use.
2) Alternative metrics and scholarly collaboration networks are presented as ways to track attention and discover content online. Examples of metrics for articles are shown.
3) The document concludes with tasks for participants to check their online profiles, consider strategic social media use, and access additional homework materials.
Evolving and emerging scholarly communication services in libraries: public a...Claire Stewart
This document provides an overview of a guest lecture about evolving scholarly communication services in libraries and their role in supporting public access compliance and assessing research impact. It discusses challenges libraries face in helping researchers comply with public access policies from funders. It also explores metrics and indicators used to measure research impact, noting limitations, and how libraries can help address this complex issue by leveraging their expertise in managing scholarly information and data.
This presentation considers the changing nature of the scholarly record and applies the findings of NMC Horizons Report Library Edition 2014 to the Claremont Colleges Library's institutional repository.
This document provides an introduction to using social media for scientists. It discusses how social media can benefit research by improving efficiency, enhancing networking, and increasing visibility and metrics. Popular tools include blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest. Maintaining an online presence allows scientists to join conversations and stay up-to-date, but requires navigating large amounts of information. Social media may transform scientific culture by enabling extended discussions.
A presentation to the World Nutrition Summit 2021 (Cape Town, March 4-6) on how low-carb activists and insulin resistance scholars can make responsible contributions through their digital voices.
Similar to NEWORDER Project - Science in the online knowledge order (20)
Understanding Scientific and Societal Adoption and Impact of Science Through ...Stefan Dietze
Keynote on analysing scholarly discourse at Second International Workshop on Semantic Technologies and Deep Learning Models for Scientific, Technical and Legal Data SemTech4STLD, held on 26 May at ESWC2024
An interdisciplinary journey with the SAL spaceship – results and challenges ...Stefan Dietze
Keynote at HELMeTO2022 conference, Palermo, Italy on recent research in Search As Learning (SAL), at the intersection of machine learning and cognitive psychology.
Research Knowledge Graphs at NFDI4DS & GESISStefan Dietze
Research Knowledge Graphs (RKGs) can help address challenges in data science like reproducibility and bias by making relationships between scientific resources like data, publications, and methods explicit and machine-interpretable. GESIS is constructing large-scale RKGs using natural language processing and deep learning methods to extract knowledge graphs about software and data usage from millions of publications. These RKGs power semantic search and enable new social science research using datasets like TweetsKB, which contains over 10 billion annotated tweets. The NFDI4DS aims to build a joint RKG by connecting existing RKGs through common standards and identifiers.
Beyond research data infrastructures: exploiting artificial & crowd intellige...Stefan Dietze
This document discusses using artificial and crowd intelligence to build research knowledge graphs from online data sources. It describes harvesting metadata about research datasets from open data portals and web pages marked up with schemas like RDFa. Machine learning techniques are used to clean and fuse the harvested metadata into a knowledge graph. The knowledge graph can be queried to provide information about research datasets and related entities. Additional methods are discussed for linking mentions of datasets in scholarly publications to real-world datasets.
From Web Data to Knowledge: on the Complementarity of Human and Artificial In...Stefan Dietze
Inaugural lecture at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf on 28 May 2019.
Abstract:
When searching the Web for information, human knowledge and artificial intelligence are in constant interplay. On the one hand, human online interactions such as click streams, crowd-sourced knowledge graphs, semi-structured web markup or distributional semantic models built from billions of Web documents are informing machine learning and information retrieval models, for instance, as part of the Google search engine. On the other hand, the very same search engines help users in finding relevant documents, facts, or data for particular information needs, thereby helping users to gain knowledge. This talk will give an overview of recent work in both of the aforementioned areas. This includes 1) research on mining structured knowledge graphs of factual knowledge, claims and opinions from heterogeneous Web documents as well as 2) recent work in the field of interactive information retrieval, where supervised models are trained to predict the knowledge (gain) of users during Web search sessions in order to personalise rankings. Both streams of research are converging as part of online platforms and applications to facilitate access to data(sets), information and knowledge.
Using AI to understand everyday learning on the WebStefan Dietze
1) The document discusses using artificial intelligence to understand informal learning that occurs on the web through people's everyday activities like searching online.
2) It describes several research projects aimed at detecting learning behaviors and predicting users' knowledge gains from analyzing patterns in their search histories, browsing activities, and other online traces.
3) The goal is to develop models that support learners in efficiently finding reliable information online and gauging their "learning to learn" skills, and applying these to specific online platforms commonly used for daily learning.
Analysing User Knowledge, Competence and Learning during Online ActivitiesStefan Dietze
Research talk given at Italian National Research Council (CNR), Institute for Educational Technologies (ITD) on learning analytics in everyday online activities.
Analysing & Improving Learning Resources Markup on the WebStefan Dietze
Talk at WWW2017 on LRMI adoption, quality and usage. Full paper here: http://papers.www2017.com.au.s3-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/companion/p283.pdf.
Beyond Linked Data - Exploiting Entity-Centric Knowledge on the WebStefan Dietze
This document discusses enabling discovery and search of linked data and knowledge graphs. It presents approaches for dataset recommendation including using vocabulary overlap and existing links between datasets. It also discusses profiling datasets to create topic profiles using entity extraction and ranking techniques. These recommendation and profiling approaches aim to help with discovering relevant datasets and entities for a given topic or task.
Big Data in Learning Analytics - Analytics for Everyday LearningStefan Dietze
This document summarizes Stefan Dietze's presentation on big data in learning analytics. Some key points:
- Learning analytics has traditionally focused on formal learning environments but there is interest in expanding to informal learning online.
- Examples of potential big data sources mentioned include activity streams, social networks, behavioral traces, and large web crawls.
- Challenges include efficiently analyzing large datasets to understand learning resources and detect learning activities without traditional assessments.
- Initial models show potential to predict learner competence from behavioral traces with over 90% accuracy.
Retrieval, Crawling and Fusion of Entity-centric Data on the WebStefan Dietze
Stefan Dietze gave a keynote presentation covering three main topics:
1) Challenges in entity retrieval from heterogeneous linked datasets and knowledge graphs due to diversity and lack of standardization.
2) Approaches for enabling discovery and search through dataset recommendation, profiling, and entity retrieval methods that cluster entities to address link sparsity.
3) Going beyond linked data to exploit semantics embedded in web markup, with case studies in data fusion for entity reconciliation and retrieval.
Mining and Understanding Activities and Resources on the WebStefan Dietze
Research Seminar at KMRC Tübingen, Germany, on mining and understanding of Web acivities and resources through knowledge discovery and machine learning approaches.
Towards embedded Markup of Learning Resources on the WebStefan Dietze
This document analyzes the usage of terms from the Learning Resources Metadata Initiative (LRMI) embedded in web pages. It finds that from 2013 to 2014 there was a significant growth in LRMI adoption, with more distinct classes used but fewer overall documents. The most common learning resource types were worksheets and games. Several errors were also observed in LRMI statements, such as capitalization issues and undefined properties. The analysis is limited to a subset of web pages marked up as creative works, and ongoing work aims to analyze the full subset to further understand how LRMI is being used on the web.
Semantic Linking & Retrieval for Digital LibrariesStefan Dietze
An overview of recent works on entitiy linking and retrieval in large corpora, specifically bibliographic data. The works address both traditional Linked Data and knowledge graphs as well as data extracted from Web markup, such as the Web Data Commons.
Linked Data for Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC)Stefan Dietze
The document discusses the relationship between building information modeling (BIM) and the semantic web. It provides an introduction to linked data and describes how semantic web technologies can be used to add contextual and background knowledge to BIM data, such as geographical, historical, and statistical information. It also addresses challenges around preserving and maintaining the evolution of linked BIM and architecture data on the semantic web.
BIRDS DIVERSITY OF SOOTEA BISWANATH ASSAM.ppt.pptxgoluk9330
Ahota Beel, nestled in Sootea Biswanath Assam , is celebrated for its extraordinary diversity of bird species. This wetland sanctuary supports a myriad of avian residents and migrants alike. Visitors can admire the elegant flights of migratory species such as the Northern Pintail and Eurasian Wigeon, alongside resident birds including the Asian Openbill and Pheasant-tailed Jacana. With its tranquil scenery and varied habitats, Ahota Beel offers a perfect haven for birdwatchers to appreciate and study the vibrant birdlife that thrives in this natural refuge.
PPT on Alternate Wetting and Drying presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Evidence of Jet Activity from the Secondary Black Hole in the OJ 287 Binary S...Sérgio Sacani
Wereport the study of a huge optical intraday flare on 2021 November 12 at 2 a.m. UT in the blazar OJ287. In the binary black hole model, it is associated with an impact of the secondary black hole on the accretion disk of the primary. Our multifrequency observing campaign was set up to search for such a signature of the impact based on a prediction made 8 yr earlier. The first I-band results of the flare have already been reported by Kishore et al. (2024). Here we combine these data with our monitoring in the R-band. There is a big change in the R–I spectral index by 1.0 ±0.1 between the normal background and the flare, suggesting a new component of radiation. The polarization variation during the rise of the flare suggests the same. The limits on the source size place it most reasonably in the jet of the secondary BH. We then ask why we have not seen this phenomenon before. We show that OJ287 was never before observed with sufficient sensitivity on the night when the flare should have happened according to the binary model. We also study the probability that this flare is just an oversized example of intraday variability using the Krakow data set of intense monitoring between 2015 and 2023. We find that the occurrence of a flare of this size and rapidity is unlikely. In machine-readable Tables 1 and 2, we give the full orbit-linked historical light curve of OJ287 as well as the dense monitoring sample of Krakow.
PPT on Sustainable Land Management presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
Candidate young stellar objects in the S-cluster: Kinematic analysis of a sub...Sérgio Sacani
Context. The observation of several L-band emission sources in the S cluster has led to a rich discussion of their nature. However, a definitive answer to the classification of the dusty objects requires an explanation for the detection of compact Doppler-shifted Brγ emission. The ionized hydrogen in combination with the observation of mid-infrared L-band continuum emission suggests that most of these sources are embedded in a dusty envelope. These embedded sources are part of the S-cluster, and their relationship to the S-stars is still under debate. To date, the question of the origin of these two populations has been vague, although all explanations favor migration processes for the individual cluster members. Aims. This work revisits the S-cluster and its dusty members orbiting the supermassive black hole SgrA* on bound Keplerian orbits from a kinematic perspective. The aim is to explore the Keplerian parameters for patterns that might imply a nonrandom distribution of the sample. Additionally, various analytical aspects are considered to address the nature of the dusty sources. Methods. Based on the photometric analysis, we estimated the individual H−K and K−L colors for the source sample and compared the results to known cluster members. The classification revealed a noticeable contrast between the S-stars and the dusty sources. To fit the flux-density distribution, we utilized the radiative transfer code HYPERION and implemented a young stellar object Class I model. We obtained the position angle from the Keplerian fit results; additionally, we analyzed the distribution of the inclinations and the longitudes of the ascending node. Results. The colors of the dusty sources suggest a stellar nature consistent with the spectral energy distribution in the near and midinfrared domains. Furthermore, the evaporation timescales of dusty and gaseous clumps in the vicinity of SgrA* are much shorter ( 2yr) than the epochs covered by the observations (≈15yr). In addition to the strong evidence for the stellar classification of the D-sources, we also find a clear disk-like pattern following the arrangements of S-stars proposed in the literature. Furthermore, we find a global intrinsic inclination for all dusty sources of 60 ± 20◦, implying a common formation process. Conclusions. The pattern of the dusty sources manifested in the distribution of the position angles, inclinations, and longitudes of the ascending node strongly suggests two different scenarios: the main-sequence stars and the dusty stellar S-cluster sources share a common formation history or migrated with a similar formation channel in the vicinity of SgrA*. Alternatively, the gravitational influence of SgrA* in combination with a massive perturber, such as a putative intermediate mass black hole in the IRS 13 cluster, forces the dusty objects and S-stars to follow a particular orbital arrangement. Key words. stars: black holes– stars: formation– Galaxy: center– galaxies: star formation
Signatures of wave erosion in Titan’s coastsSérgio Sacani
The shorelines of Titan’s hydrocarbon seas trace flooded erosional landforms such as river valleys; however, it isunclear whether coastal erosion has subsequently altered these shorelines. Spacecraft observations and theo-retical models suggest that wind may cause waves to form on Titan’s seas, potentially driving coastal erosion,but the observational evidence of waves is indirect, and the processes affecting shoreline evolution on Titanremain unknown. No widely accepted framework exists for using shoreline morphology to quantitatively dis-cern coastal erosion mechanisms, even on Earth, where the dominant mechanisms are known. We combinelandscape evolution models with measurements of shoreline shape on Earth to characterize how differentcoastal erosion mechanisms affect shoreline morphology. Applying this framework to Titan, we find that theshorelines of Titan’s seas are most consistent with flooded landscapes that subsequently have been eroded bywaves, rather than a uniform erosional process or no coastal erosion, particularly if wave growth saturates atfetch lengths of tens of kilometers.
JAMES WEBB STUDY THE MASSIVE BLACK HOLE SEEDSSérgio Sacani
The pathway(s) to seeding the massive black holes (MBHs) that exist at the heart of galaxies in the present and distant Universe remains an unsolved problem. Here we categorise, describe and quantitatively discuss the formation pathways of both light and heavy seeds. We emphasise that the most recent computational models suggest that rather than a bimodal-like mass spectrum between light and heavy seeds with light at one end and heavy at the other that instead a continuum exists. Light seeds being more ubiquitous and the heavier seeds becoming less and less abundant due the rarer environmental conditions required for their formation. We therefore examine the different mechanisms that give rise to different seed mass spectrums. We show how and why the mechanisms that produce the heaviest seeds are also among the rarest events in the Universe and are hence extremely unlikely to be the seeds for the vast majority of the MBH population. We quantify, within the limits of the current large uncertainties in the seeding processes, the expected number densities of the seed mass spectrum. We argue that light seeds must be at least 103 to 105 times more numerous than heavy seeds to explain the MBH population as a whole. Based on our current understanding of the seed population this makes heavy seeds (Mseed > 103 M⊙) a significantly more likely pathway given that heavy seeds have an abundance pattern than is close to and likely in excess of 10−4 compared to light seeds. Finally, we examine the current state-of-the-art in numerical calculations and recent observations and plot a path forward for near-future advances in both domains.
3. 3
▪ Percentage of tweets containing
links to scientific articles (journals,
publishers, science blogs etc)
▪ Uses list of > 17 K science web
domains (URLs)
▪ Data source: 1% sample of Twitter
(https://data.gesis.org/tweetskb/),
(> 14 bn tweets archived since
2013)
Motivation: scientific online discourse is on the rise
Example: Twitter / X
4. 4
NEWORDER project
Interdisciplinary approach, team and objectives
▪ Perception of roles, sources, and authority; impact on trust-
worthiness assessment
(Cognitive Psychology)
▪ Dissolution of phases, hierarchies and contexts in the
scientific process
(Social Sciences, Media & Communication Studies)
▪ Computational methods for collecting, detecting and
classifying scientific online discourse
(Computer Science/AI & Computational Linguistics)
Cress, Utz (IWM & Uni Tübingen)
Marcinkowski, Koss (HHU)
Dietze, Boland, Jabeen (GESIS), Kallmeyer (HHU)
5. How can „scientific discourse“ be defined?
Example: Twitter / X
5
Science claim
Science reference
Science relevance
No science
Science reference
Hafid, S., Schellhammer, S., Bringay, S., Todorov, K., Dietze, S., SciTweets - A Dataset and Annotation Framework for Detecting Scientific Online Discourse,
CIKM2022
6. Training AI to detect science discourse: SciTweets dataset & classifier
6
▪ Manual annotation of ground truth dataset for
testing models (heuristics-based sampling,
annotation framework, > 1K annotated tweets)
▪ Training AI models to detect science discourse in
large-scale discourse data (e.g. Web archives)
▪ Reasonable classification performance using fine-
tuned language model (SciBERT) applied to
TweetsKB data
Hafid, S., Schellhammer, S., Bringay, S., Todorov, K., Dietze, S., SciTweets - A Dataset and Annotation Framework for Detecting Scientific Online Discourse,
CIKM2022
https://github.com/AI-4-Sci/SciTweets
7. What is science discourse and how does it evolve?
Increasing amount and proportion of not peer-reviewed science works
7
Absolute amount of tweets sharing preprints Proportion of preprints among shared science URLs
8. How is public attention distributed?
Power law distribution
8
• 10% of studies receive
> 75% of all Twitter
mentions
• Long tail of studies
with few mentions
• Data source: 1.67 M
tweets mentioning at
least one of the
primary science
studies in the
„Altmetrics“ corpus
Top x (%) of mentioned science studies
Share
of
twitter
mentions
(%)
9. Challenge: online science discourse is not well-informed
Links to actual scientific studies/context missing in news & social media
9
10. ▪ NLP models able to predict missing primary science reference (e.g. DOI or journal paper link) for
given informal reference (e.g. “Heinsberg Studie”) or secondary reference (news article)
Challenge: online science discourse is not well-informed
Links to actual scientific studies/context missing in news & social media
10
11. ▪ NLP models able to predict missing primary science reference (e.g. DOI or journal paper link) for
given informal reference (e.g. “Heinsberg Studie”) or secondary reference (news article)
Challenge: online science discourse is not well-informed
Links to actual scientific studies/context missing in news & social media
11
▪ Supervised & unsupervised approaches using DL language models
12. Science discourse is „different“
12
Examples from http://snopes.com
Non-science claim
Science claim
13. Computational (AI) challenge
NLP methods (e.g. for fact-checking) perform worse on science discourse
13
▪ Take-away: AI-based methods geared towards scientific discourse required
Performance of state-of-the-art AI/deep learning using standard benchmark datasets
Claim Check-Worthiness
Detection
Fake News Detection
Claim Verification
14. Wrap-Up & Outlook: Interdisciplinary Work Plan
Media & Communication Studies
(spreading pattern & societal impact)
WP5 Longitudinal online discourse analysis
WP2 Dissolution of phases & contexts
WP3 Perception of roles, credibility & trust
WP1 Data collection & study preparation
Cognitive & Social Psychology
(effects on individuals)
Computer & Information Science
(understanding online discourse)
WP4 NLP for classifying sources & roles