Negotiating with Difficult People Victoria Pynchon, ADR Services, Inc .
Businesses do not have legal problems Only lawyers have legal problems Businesses have business problems With People concerns And Justice Issues
Why do people seek the services of
 
Injustices that the law will rectify are dwarfed by the injustices it will not.  We generally consider non-actionable injustices to be  frivolous claims. The  parties’ complaints almost always include non-actionable injustices which laws, rules, standards, best practices, policies, procedures, and even folkways cannot address.  World of  Injustice Injustices the  law will remedy
Relative Benefits  v.  Absolute Numbers
distributive justice, or the perceived fairness of outcomes  procedural justice, or the perceived fairness of the procedures by which outcomes are determined  interactional justice, the perceived fairness of the nuances of interpersonal treatment.
We identify rights and responsibilities transform (nip, tuck, spin, frame, highlight, downplay, flatten) narratives of injustice into actionable causes of action monetize those injustices sharpen the differences between “our” story and our “opponent’s” story ask a third party (judge, arbitrator, jury) to choose a “side. Translate victories and defeats on the legal field of combat into a narrative our clients can understand
THE BASICS OF CONFLICT “Time is what keeps everything from happening at once” Stephen Hawking
Conflict is a Perceived  divergence of interests  or   the belief that the current aspirations of the parties cannot be  simultaneously met
Scarce Resources Contending Shirley Jackson’s “Lottery” Logan’s Run Strong survive/weak die Problem solving Hunting/gathering to agriculture/husbandry Farming/hunting to industry Industry to technology Material (steel, cars, trains, planes) to Immaterial (knowledge) “ Innovate, don’t litigate (contend)”  Jonathan Schwartz,  CEO Sun Microsystems
Persuasion Exercise Object of the game Get your partner to come over to your side of the line The winners will each will $1.00
Relative deprivation Injurious Event Perceptions Self interest/desire Other interest/desire Conflict’s Source Resources Values Dispute = Immediate Manifestation of Conflict Naming Blaming Claiming Tactics Yielding Avoiding Contending Problem Solving Tit for Tat Start nice Be Provokable Be Forgiving
Tactics Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers Yielding/Avoiding Negative for yielder Nothing changes for other in a blind approach for landing through clouds where the first officer is convinced that the plane is heading against solid mountain rock all he says is “I am not sure if we have established our gliding path with necessary precision”.
Contentious Tactics Ingratiation & gamesmanship Threat, promises & arguments Shaming Coercive Commitments Physical Violence Win-lose Resolution unstable
Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers Problem Solving Satisfies some of both parties’ interests Resolution is stable
End of  Part I

Negotiating With Difficult People Part One

  • 1.
    Negotiating with DifficultPeople Victoria Pynchon, ADR Services, Inc .
  • 2.
    Businesses do nothave legal problems Only lawyers have legal problems Businesses have business problems With People concerns And Justice Issues
  • 3.
    Why do peopleseek the services of
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Injustices that thelaw will rectify are dwarfed by the injustices it will not. We generally consider non-actionable injustices to be frivolous claims. The parties’ complaints almost always include non-actionable injustices which laws, rules, standards, best practices, policies, procedures, and even folkways cannot address. World of Injustice Injustices the law will remedy
  • 6.
    Relative Benefits v. Absolute Numbers
  • 7.
    distributive justice, orthe perceived fairness of outcomes procedural justice, or the perceived fairness of the procedures by which outcomes are determined interactional justice, the perceived fairness of the nuances of interpersonal treatment.
  • 8.
    We identify rightsand responsibilities transform (nip, tuck, spin, frame, highlight, downplay, flatten) narratives of injustice into actionable causes of action monetize those injustices sharpen the differences between “our” story and our “opponent’s” story ask a third party (judge, arbitrator, jury) to choose a “side. Translate victories and defeats on the legal field of combat into a narrative our clients can understand
  • 9.
    THE BASICS OFCONFLICT “Time is what keeps everything from happening at once” Stephen Hawking
  • 10.
    Conflict is aPerceived divergence of interests or the belief that the current aspirations of the parties cannot be simultaneously met
  • 11.
    Scarce Resources ContendingShirley Jackson’s “Lottery” Logan’s Run Strong survive/weak die Problem solving Hunting/gathering to agriculture/husbandry Farming/hunting to industry Industry to technology Material (steel, cars, trains, planes) to Immaterial (knowledge) “ Innovate, don’t litigate (contend)” Jonathan Schwartz, CEO Sun Microsystems
  • 12.
    Persuasion Exercise Objectof the game Get your partner to come over to your side of the line The winners will each will $1.00
  • 13.
    Relative deprivation InjuriousEvent Perceptions Self interest/desire Other interest/desire Conflict’s Source Resources Values Dispute = Immediate Manifestation of Conflict Naming Blaming Claiming Tactics Yielding Avoiding Contending Problem Solving Tit for Tat Start nice Be Provokable Be Forgiving
  • 14.
    Tactics Malcolm Gladwell,Outliers Yielding/Avoiding Negative for yielder Nothing changes for other in a blind approach for landing through clouds where the first officer is convinced that the plane is heading against solid mountain rock all he says is “I am not sure if we have established our gliding path with necessary precision”.
  • 15.
    Contentious Tactics Ingratiation& gamesmanship Threat, promises & arguments Shaming Coercive Commitments Physical Violence Win-lose Resolution unstable
  • 16.
    Malcolm Gladwell, OutliersProblem Solving Satisfies some of both parties’ interests Resolution is stable
  • 17.
    End of Part I