Multiphase flow modelling of calcite dissolution patterns from core scale to reservoir scale - Jeroen Snippe, Shell, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
Multiphase flow modelling of calcite dissolution patterns from core scale to reservoir scale - Jeroen Snippe, Shell, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
Shell hosted a socially responsible investors’ forum in New York on September 9, 2011, including a presentation led by Chief Executive officer Peter Voser and Chad Holliday, Chairman of the RDS Corporate and Social Responsibility Committee and Member of the RDS Remuneration committee.
Media webcast presentation Royal Dutch Shell fourth quarter and full year 201...Shell plc
Peter Voser, Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell will host a live video webcast of the Fourth quarter 2011 and Full year Results and Outlook on Thursday February 2 2012, 10:30 GMT (11:30 CET / 05:30 EST).
Paul Goodfellow– Haynesville operations and operating principlesShell plc
Shell held a field visit for Socially Responsible Investors in Houston and in the Haynesville gas field, Louisiana, at which Russ Ford, EVP onshore gas, John Hollowell, EVP deepwater and Paul Goodfellow, VP production onshore gas all presented. The focus of the presentations and visit was to illustrate Shell’s tight gas operations in the context of sustainable development and our commitment to responsible deepwater operations.
Prelude FLNG Innovations - As presented by Mike Efthymiou,
Professor of Offshore Engineering, University of Western Australia
Managing Innovations in a MegaProject
Side-by-side Offloading
Turret & Mooring
Water Intake Risers
Shell Socially responsible investors briefing in London, April 10, 2014Shell plc
Ben van Beurden, Chief Executive Officer and Chad Holliday, Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Corporate and Social Responsibility Committee presented to Shell’s socially responsible investors in London during the annual socially responsible investors briefing. The event also included a short presentation on Shell’s approach to Carbon.
2012 Management Day London/New York - Global Gas Perspectives and Asia Pacifi...Shell plc
Shell hosted a management day with investors in London (Wednesday 14th November 2012) and New York (Thursday 15th November 2012) focusing on global gas perspectives and Asia Pacific outlook. Presentations were lead by Chief Executive Officer, Peter Voser and Chief Financial Officer, Simon Henry followed by Andrew Brown (Director Upstream International) and Matthias Bichsel (Director Projects & Technology).
Shell hosted a socially responsible investors’ forum in New York on September 9, 2011, including a presentation led by Chief Executive officer Peter Voser and Chad Holliday, Chairman of the RDS Corporate and Social Responsibility Committee and Member of the RDS Remuneration committee.
Media webcast presentation Royal Dutch Shell fourth quarter and full year 201...Shell plc
Peter Voser, Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell will host a live video webcast of the Fourth quarter 2011 and Full year Results and Outlook on Thursday February 2 2012, 10:30 GMT (11:30 CET / 05:30 EST).
Paul Goodfellow– Haynesville operations and operating principlesShell plc
Shell held a field visit for Socially Responsible Investors in Houston and in the Haynesville gas field, Louisiana, at which Russ Ford, EVP onshore gas, John Hollowell, EVP deepwater and Paul Goodfellow, VP production onshore gas all presented. The focus of the presentations and visit was to illustrate Shell’s tight gas operations in the context of sustainable development and our commitment to responsible deepwater operations.
Prelude FLNG Innovations - As presented by Mike Efthymiou,
Professor of Offshore Engineering, University of Western Australia
Managing Innovations in a MegaProject
Side-by-side Offloading
Turret & Mooring
Water Intake Risers
Shell Socially responsible investors briefing in London, April 10, 2014Shell plc
Ben van Beurden, Chief Executive Officer and Chad Holliday, Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Corporate and Social Responsibility Committee presented to Shell’s socially responsible investors in London during the annual socially responsible investors briefing. The event also included a short presentation on Shell’s approach to Carbon.
2012 Management Day London/New York - Global Gas Perspectives and Asia Pacifi...Shell plc
Shell hosted a management day with investors in London (Wednesday 14th November 2012) and New York (Thursday 15th November 2012) focusing on global gas perspectives and Asia Pacific outlook. Presentations were lead by Chief Executive Officer, Peter Voser and Chief Financial Officer, Simon Henry followed by Andrew Brown (Director Upstream International) and Matthias Bichsel (Director Projects & Technology).
Muhammad Shittu (GM Flared Gas) presented at a field visit Shell organised for Socially Responsible Investors in Port Harcourt, Nigeria on October 10, 2012.
Royal Dutch Shell plc socially responsible investors briefing in London, Apri...Shell plc
Peter Voser, Chief Executive Officer and Chad Holliday, Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Corporate and Social Responsibility Committee presented to Shell’s Socially Responsible Investors in London during the annual socially responsible investors briefing.
Analyst webcast presentation Royal Dutch Shell third quarter 2012 resultsShell plc
Simon Henry, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell plc hosted a webcast for analysts of the third quarter 2012 results on Thursday November 1, 2012.
Analyst webcast presentation Royal Dutch Shell fourth quarter and full year 2...Shell plc
Peter Voser, Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell will host a live video webcast of the Fourth quarter 2011 and Full year Results and Outlook on Thursday February 2 2012, 10:30 GMT (11:30 CET / 05:30 EST).
Muhammad Shittu (GM Flared Gas) presented at a field visit Shell organised for Socially Responsible Investors in Port Harcourt, Nigeria on October 10, 2012.
Royal Dutch Shell plc socially responsible investors briefing in London, Apri...Shell plc
Peter Voser, Chief Executive Officer and Chad Holliday, Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the Corporate and Social Responsibility Committee presented to Shell’s Socially Responsible Investors in London during the annual socially responsible investors briefing.
Analyst webcast presentation Royal Dutch Shell third quarter 2012 resultsShell plc
Simon Henry, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Dutch Shell plc hosted a webcast for analysts of the third quarter 2012 results on Thursday November 1, 2012.
Analyst webcast presentation Royal Dutch Shell fourth quarter and full year 2...Shell plc
Peter Voser, Chief Executive Officer of Royal Dutch Shell will host a live video webcast of the Fourth quarter 2011 and Full year Results and Outlook on Thursday February 2 2012, 10:30 GMT (11:30 CET / 05:30 EST).
Pore scale dynamics and the interpretation of flow processes - Martin Blunt, Imperial College London, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
Passive seismic monitoring for CO2 storage sites - Anna Stork, University of Bristol at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Geophysical modelling for CO2 storage, monitoring and appraisal, 3 November 2015
Numerical Modelling of Fracture Growth and Caprock Integrity During CO2 Injection, Adriana Paluszny - Geophysical Modelling for CO2 Storage, Leeds, 3 November 2015
Research Coordination Network on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Funded by National Science Foundation in USA - A.-H. Alissa Park, Columbia University - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Biannual 8-9 September 2015
Packed Bed Reactor for Catalytic Cracking of Plasma Pyrolyzed Gasijsrd.com
Packed bed reactors play vital role in chemical industries for obtaining valuable product, like steam reforming of natural gas, ammonia synthesis, sulphuric acid production, methanol synthesis, methanol oxidation, butadiene production, styrene production. It is not only used for production but also used in separation process like adsorption, distillation and stripping section. Packed bed reactors are work horse of the chemical and petroleum industries. Its low cost, and simplicity makes it first choice to any chemical processes. In our experimental work vacuum residue is used as a feed which is pyrolyzed in the primary chamber with the help of plasma into hydrogen and hydrocarbon gases which is feed stream to the Ni catalyst containing packed bed reactor called catalytic cracker. Ni loading in the catalyst about 70 % is used to crack or decompose lower molecular hydrocarbon in to hydrogen to maximize the energy content per mass flow of gas steam and also to minimize the carbon dioxide equivalent gases at outlet of the reactor. Since cracking is surface phenomena so the catalyst play important role in designing of reactor shape. Parallel Catalytic packed bed with regeneration and deactivation can be used for commercial production of clean fuel.
Long term safety of geological co2 storage: lessons from Bravo Dome Natural CO2 reservoir - Marc Hesse, University of Texas at Austin, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
Advances in Rock Physics Modelling and Improved Estimation of CO2 Saturation, Giorgos Papageorgiou - Geophysical Modelling for CO2 Storage, Leeds, 3 November 2015
CCUS Roadmap for Mexico - presentation by M. Vita Peralta Martínez (IIE - Electric Research Institute, Mexico) for the UKCCSRC, Edinburgh, 13 November 2015
Meihong Wang (University of Hull) - Process Intensification for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture using Rotating Packed Bed through Systems Engineering Techniques - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015
Similar to Multiphase flow modelling of calcite dissolution patterns from core scale to reservoir scale - Jeroen Snippe, Shell, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
UKCCSRC seminar given by Devin Shaw of Shell Cansolv, Edinburgh, 3 September 2014, on "Capturing Momentum at Peterhead: Capture technology selection and optimization process"
Deepwater Energy Conference (DEC)2018 was held in Haikou, China. This event featured a dynamic group of speakers who discussed how deepwater technologies unlock new resources and develop in different ways. For additional details see: http://www.decchina.cn/en
The Shell LNG Outlook, launched in London on February 20th, is an assessment of the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) market. It finds that China and India were two of the fastest growing buyers, with the number of LNG importers worldwide up to 35, from 10 at the start of the century.
Read the Shell LNG Outlook in full at http://www.shell.com/lngoutlook
This presentation was given by Michelle van der Duin, Senior Project Development & Delivery Manager and Head of Shell's Onshore LNG Programme Office, to delegates at the APM Women in Project Management SIG's annual conference 2015.
The conference, entitled 'Driving the future', was held at etc.venues Dexter House in London and saw some 170 delegates and was sponsored by BAE Systems.
The agenda was full of stimulating talks and interactive debate designed to facilitate knowledge-sharing and fresh insights for attendees.
Delegates will left the conference armed with new ideas for progressing their own careers and personal development and, of course, bursting with enthusiasm to promote the profession and encourage a new generation of project managers.
The objectives of the conference were:
- Reinforce the importance of women in project management
- Highlight the importance of women’s contribution to the economy through practical examples
- Provide opportunities for delegates to hear from leading professionals and to be inspired to drive the future in their own careers.
- Provide perspectives on what to ask of employers improve project delivery
- Provide food for thought for delegates to help them drive their own objectives and achieve their career goals
Initiated by the owner operator community, Capital Facilities Information Handover Specification (CFIHOS – pronounced “see-fos”) is an emerging standard for a consistent approach to information handover meant to reduce the inefficiencies and costs in the information supply chain.
As one of the initiative’s earliest adopters, Mike Curtin, VP Capital Project IM/IT, explains in this presentation how Shell’s project execution approach is evolving to align with the new standards, the impacts of CFIHOS on the industry and who is affected, and finally how technology is changing to support the shift. Mike also covers Shell’s journey from document to data centric information management for CFIHOS readiness, and finally,the next steps in their path towards digitalization across greenfield project execution and operations of existing assets.
AVEVA World Conference NA - Mike Curtin, ShellAVEVA-Americas
Initiated by the owner operator community, Capital Facilities
Information Handover Specification (CFIHOS - pronounced
“see-fos”) is an emerging standard for a consistent approach to
information handover meant to reduce the inefficiencies and costs in the information supply chain. As one of the initiative’s earliest adopters, Mike Curtin, VP Capital Project IM/IT, discusses how Shell’s project execution approach is evolving to align with the new standards, the impacts of CFIHOS on the industry and who is affected, and finally how technology is changing to support the shift. Mike also covers Shell’s journey from document to data centric information management for CFIHOS readiness, and finally, the next steps in their path towards digitalization across greenfield project execution and operations of existing assets.
Shell, with strategic support from SSE, are looking to develop the world’s first full-scale gas carbon capture and storage (CCS) project – the Peterhead CCS Project. The proposed project would see 10 to 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions captured from the Peterhead Power Station in the North East of Scotland and transported by pipeline offshore for geological storage deep under the North Sea.
In March 2013, the Peterhead CCS Project was chosen as one of two CCS demonstration projects in the UK to progress to the next stage of the UK Government’s CCS Commercialisation Competition funding. This funding allowed the Project to progress through the detailed design phase known as Front-End Engineering Design, or FEED.
Now, as the Project nears the end of this FEED phase of development, we were delighted to have Peterhead’s Business Opportunity Manager, Bill Spence join us for this webinar. In addition to giving an overview of the project and an update on recent developments, Bill also painted a picture of how this proposed project fits into Shell’s overall global CCS programme.
Royal Dutch Shell plc Investor Day in New York, September 5, 2014Shell plc
Shell’s management hosted an investor day in New York on September 5, 2014, including presentations by Ben Van Beurden, Chief Executive Officer of, Simon Henry, Chief Financial Officer of, Marvin Odum, Upstream Americas Director of, and John Abbott, Downstream Director of Royal Dutch Shell plc.
Similar to Multiphase flow modelling of calcite dissolution patterns from core scale to reservoir scale - Jeroen Snippe, Shell, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015 (20)
Assessing Uncertainty of Time Lapse Seismic Response Due to Geomechanical Deformation, Doug Angus - Geophysical Modelling for CO2 Storage, Leeds, 3 November 2015
Modelling Fault Reactivation, Induced Seismicity, and Leakage During Underground CO2 Injection, Jonny Rutquvist - Geophysical Modelling for CO2 Storage, Leeds, 3 November 2015
Computational Modelling and Optimisation of Carbon Capture Reactors, Daniel Sebastiá Sáez, Cranfield University - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Biannual 8-9 September 2015
Effective Adsorbents for Establishing Solids Looping as a Next Generation NG PCC Technology, Hao Liu, University of Nottingham - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Biannual 8-9 September 2015
Adsorption Materials and Processes for Carbon Capture from Gas-Fired Power Plants - AMPGas, Enzo Mangano, University of Edinburgh - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Biannual 8-9 September 2015
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon Future for the UK, Stuart Haszeldine, University of Edinburgh - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Biannual 8-9 September 2015
Forklift Classes Overview by Intella PartsIntella Parts
Discover the different forklift classes and their specific applications. Learn how to choose the right forklift for your needs to ensure safety, efficiency, and compliance in your operations.
For more technical information, visit our website https://intellaparts.com
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...Amil Baba Dawood bangali
Contact with Dawood Bhai Just call on +92322-6382012 and we'll help you. We'll solve all your problems within 12 to 24 hours and with 101% guarantee and with astrology systematic. If you want to take any personal or professional advice then also you can call us on +92322-6382012 , ONLINE LOVE PROBLEM & Other all types of Daily Life Problem's.Then CALL or WHATSAPP us on +92322-6382012 and Get all these problems solutions here by Amil Baba DAWOOD BANGALI
#vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore#blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #blackmagicforlove #blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #Amilbabainuk #amilbabainspain #amilbabaindubai #Amilbabainnorway #amilbabainkrachi #amilbabainlahore #amilbabaingujranwalan #amilbabainislamabad
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
Buying new cosmetic products is difficult. It can even be scary for those who have sensitive skin and are prone to skin trouble. The information needed to alleviate this problem is on the back of each product, but it's thought to interpret those ingredient lists unless you have a background in chemistry.
Instead of buying and hoping for the best, we can use data science to help us predict which products may be good fits for us. It includes various function programs to do the above mentioned tasks.
Data file handling has been effectively used in the program.
The automated cosmetic shop management system should deal with the automation of general workflow and administration process of the shop. The main processes of the system focus on customer's request where the system is able to search the most appropriate products and deliver it to the customers. It should help the employees to quickly identify the list of cosmetic product that have reached the minimum quantity and also keep a track of expired date for each cosmetic product. It should help the employees to find the rack number in which the product is placed.It is also Faster and more efficient way.
Welcome to WIPAC Monthly the magazine brought to you by the LinkedIn Group Water Industry Process Automation & Control.
In this month's edition, along with this month's industry news to celebrate the 13 years since the group was created we have articles including
A case study of the used of Advanced Process Control at the Wastewater Treatment works at Lleida in Spain
A look back on an article on smart wastewater networks in order to see how the industry has measured up in the interim around the adoption of Digital Transformation in the Water Industry.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.PrashantGoswami42
Maintaining high-quality standards in the production of TMT bars is crucial for ensuring structural integrity in construction. Addressing common defects through careful monitoring, standardized processes, and advanced technology can significantly improve the quality of TMT bars. Continuous training and adherence to quality control measures will also play a pivotal role in minimizing these defects.
Saudi Arabia stands as a titan in the global energy landscape, renowned for its abundant oil and gas resources. It's the largest exporter of petroleum and holds some of the world's most significant reserves. Let's delve into the top 10 oil and gas projects shaping Saudi Arabia's energy future in 2024.
Overview of the fundamental roles in Hydropower generation and the components involved in wider Electrical Engineering.
This paper presents the design and construction of hydroelectric dams from the hydrologist’s survey of the valley before construction, all aspects and involved disciplines, fluid dynamics, structural engineering, generation and mains frequency regulation to the very transmission of power through the network in the United Kingdom.
Author: Robbie Edward Sayers
Collaborators and co editors: Charlie Sims and Connor Healey.
(C) 2024 Robbie E. Sayers
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Aryaabh.arya
Presented at NUS: Fuzzing and Software Security Summer School 2024
This keynote talks about the democratization of fuzzing at scale, highlighting the collaboration between open source communities, academia, and industry to advance the field of fuzzing. It delves into the history of fuzzing, the development of scalable fuzzing platforms, and the empowerment of community-driven research. The talk will further discuss recent advancements leveraging AI/ML and offer insights into the future evolution of the fuzzing landscape.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Multiphase flow modelling of calcite dissolution patterns from core scale to reservoir scale - Jeroen Snippe, Shell, at UKCCSRC specialist meeting Flow and Transport for CO2 Storage, 29-30 October 2015
1. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
MULTIPHASE FLOW MODELLING OF
CALCITE DISSOLUTION PATTERNS FROM
CORE SCALE TO RESERVOIR SCALE
Jeroen Snippe, Holger Ott
Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1October 2015
Presentation for UKCCSRC
Specialist Meeting on Flow and
Transport for CO2 Storage
Imperial College London,
30th October 2015
2. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
DEFINITIONS & CAUTIONARY NOTE
Reserves: Our use of the term “reserves” in this presentation means SEC proved oil and gas reserves.
Resources: Our use of the term “resources” in this presentation includes quantities of oil and gas not yet classified as SEC proved oil and gas reserves. Resources are consistent with
the Society of Petroleum Engineers 2P and 2C definitions.
Organic: Our use of the term Organic includes SEC proved oil and gas reserves excluding changes resulting from acquisitions, divestments and year-average pricing impact.
Resources plays: Our use of the term ‘resources plays’ refers to tight, shale and coal bed methane oil and gas acreage.
The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are
sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to
subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies.
‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to companies in which Royal Dutch Shell either directly or indirectly has control.
Companies over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to as “joint ventures” and companies over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control
are referred to as “associates”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or
company, after exclusion of all third-party interest.
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements
of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current
expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed
or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and
statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and
phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘target’’,
‘‘risks’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘should’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to
differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas;
(b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g)
environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such
transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including potential
litigation and regulatory measures as a result of climate changes; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of
expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared
costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal
Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the year ended 31 December, 2014 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov ). These factors also should be considered by the reader. Each
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, 2 October, 2015. Neither Royal Dutch Shell nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated,
implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. There can be no assurance that dividend payments will match or exceed those set out in this
presentation in the future, or that they will be made at all.
We use certain terms in this presentation, such as discovery potential, that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in
filings with the SEC. U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov. You can also obtain
this form from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
October 2015
3. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
INTRO: CALCITE DISSOLUTION DURING CO2 INJECTION
Context: CO2 storage/EOR
CO2 injection → acidification →
carbonate dissolution
3October 2015
Fred and Fogler (1999), SPE 56995
Experiments show ‘wormholing’
for CO2 -saturated brine injection
Similar to patterns in extensive
acid stimulation literature
Very limited experimental work
done with gas/SC CO2 injection
Model investigation
Impact of gas phase
Upscaling to field scale
4. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
MODELLING APPROACH
Using in-house dynamic multiphase reservoir flow simulator (MoReS)
coupled to open-source geochemical package (PHREEQC v3)
4October 2015
Detailed model (core scale)
Explicit representation of WH patterns
Grid resolution << WH diameter
Chemistry including kinetics (phreeqc.dat, Palandri & Kharaka)
2-phase flow description including capillary effects and diffusion
Permeability, capillary pressure, relperms modified during dissolution
Continuum scale (Darcy) model → flow within WH approximate
Effective model (core scale to well/reservoir scale) [2nd part of presentation]
Implicit representation of WH patterns
Generalised to 2-phase case with CO2
Parameters tuned to detailed model and experiments
5. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
DETAILED MODEL
5October 2015
6. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
3D
SOME MODEL RESULTS (SINGLE PHASE)
6October 2015
WH competition 5mm…
Most of fine-scale simulations done in 2D
Compact dissolution Conical dissolution Conical wormhole
Ramified wormholes Homogeneous dissol.Dominant wormhole
2D
WH width 2 mm
7. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
MODEL VALIDATION (SINGLE PHASE)
7October 2015
Ramified wormholes
Uniform dissolution
Dominant wormhole
Conical
wormhole
Compact
dissolution
Dahmkohlernumber(reactionrate/convectionrate)
Peclet number (convection rate/diffusion rate)
MoReS results (colour) plotted on domain boundaries from
Golfier et al., J. Fluid Mech. (2002), vol. 457, pp. 213-254
with experimental patterns from Fred and Fogler (1999), SPE 56995
8. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
TWO-PHASE EXPERIMENT/MODEL RATIONALE
Experiment
Two experiments were done at Shell with CO2 + brine co-injection
This is ~representative for the conditions somewhat behind the CO2
plume front in CCS
Pure CO2 injection WH experiment would be more challenging
longer core to resolve profiles (gas saturation, calcite dissolution)
high CT signal:noise to resolve subtle calcite dissolution patterns
Model:
Model experiment with CO2 + brine co-injection and compare results
Derive upscaled (effective) model description
Apply effective model to pure CO2 injection (larger model dimensions)
8October 2015
9. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
2-PHASE RELPERM AND CAPILLARY PRESSURE
9October 2015
During dissolution
Interpolation between curves (linear in porosity)
Power law scaling of permeability with porosity
0.0
1.5
3.0
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
Capillarypressure(Gas-Water)[bar]
Relativepermeability
Gas saturation
krw matrix
krg matrix
krw cavity
krg cavity
Pc matrix
Pc cavity
10. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
TWO-PHASE MODEL RESULTS (CO-INJECTION)
10October 2015
The gas phase slightly suppresses WH velocity
260 PV
single-phase two-phase co-injection (same rate)
720 PV
560 PV
760 PV
760 PV
2000 PV
260 PV
880 PV
760 PV
880 PV
760 PV
2000 PV
11. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Water Velocity (cm/min)
Brine + gas
Observed
TWO-PHASE MODEL RESULTS (CO-INJECTION)
11October 2015
Most suppression around optimal flow rates (~dominant WH regime)
12. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
TWO-PHASE MODEL RESULTS: ANALYSIS/COMPARISON
12October 2015
2-phase, 1+1 ml/min co-inj.1-phase, 1ml/min
Porosity
Experiment
(Shell)
(Porosity)
Ott et al. (2013)
SCA2013-029
Gas
saturation
Water flux
(log scale)
760 PV 880 PV
13. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
Ott, H., and S. Oedai (2015)
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2270–2276
doi:10.1002/2015GL063582
2ND SHELL EXPERIMENT: WH SUPPRESSION
In this experiment gas co-injection seems to trigger transition from
dominant WH into conical WH/compact dissolution
Slumping reproduced in model runs with gravity (only investigated on
small diameter core)
13October 2015
14. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
EFFECTIVE MODEL APPROACH
14October 2015
15. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
LEARNINGS FROM ACID STIMULATION LITERATURE
15August 2015
Acid stimulation literature
(single phase): Universally
shaped curve #PVBT vs vi (or
vWH vs vi)
Location of curve depends on
phi, perm, aspect ratio, HCl
strength, …
‘Global Wormholing Model’
(GWM), Talbot&Gdanski
(2008), SPE 113042, offers
~universal parameterisation
~predictive vWH vs vi for given
phi, perm, HCl strength, etc.
Buijse & Glasbergen
(2005), SPE 96892
16. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
GWM CHARACTERISTICS
16October 2015
Talbot&Gdanski (2008),
SPE 113042
17. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Water Velocity (cm/min)
Brine + gas Observed
compact dissolution limit Model (fit)
Model (solubility-equivalent HCl) Model (pH-equivalent HCl)
GWM APPLICATION TO CO2-BRINE
17August 2015
Deviation in single
WH regime because
Poiseuille flow profile
in model poorly
resolved or grid
resolution too coarse
Model was run in 2D,
for which GWM
model is overshooting
in face dissolution
regime
GWM model fitted by tuning HCl strength
Resulting GWM model also fits available experimental data well (next slides)
GWM model applied to dynamic flow simulations by locally accounting for
calcite saturation index through HCl strength parameter
For 2-phase use same GWM parameters – use the water vi as input velocity
18. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
OTT ET AL. (SHELL) 2013 – SCA 2013-029
18October 2015
L=5.91”, d=2.95”
q=1 mL/min
Estaillades limestone
φ=0.278, k=270 mD
T=50 °C, p=100 bar
19. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
CAROLL ET AL. (LLNL) 2013 - IJGHGC 16S (2013) S185–S193
19October 2015
L=1.18”, d=0.59”
q=0.05 mL/min
Calculated HCl equivalent based on undersaturated CO2 molality
Weyburn limestone (59% calcite)
φ=0.15, k=0.032 mD
T=60 °C, p=248 bar, p_CO2 = 30 bar
20. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
VIALLE ET AL. 2014 - J. GEOPHYS. RES. SOLID EARTH, 119, 2828–2847
20October 2015
L=0.13.8”, d=3.94”
q=5 mL/min
Salinity = 25000 ppm
Calculated HCl equivalent based on undersaturated CO2 molality
Estaillades limestone
φ=0.286, k=120 mD
T=20 °C, p_CO2 = 1 bar
21. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
LUQUOT ET AL. 2011 - TRANSP POROUS MED (2014) 101:507–532
21October 2015
L=0.71”, d=0.35”
q=0.08 mL/min
Calculated HCl equivalent based on undersaturated CO2 molality
Alcobaa limestone
φ=0.15, k=0.24 mD
T=100 °C, p=120 bar, p_CO2 = 34 bar
22. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
SVEC & GRIGG 2001 - SPE 71496
22October 2015
L=20.3”, d=1.98”
q=17 mL/min
Indiana limestone
φ=0.123, k=35.7 mD
T=38 °C, p=138 bar
Salinity=86950 ppm
23. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
LUQUOT & GOUZE 2009 - CHEMICAL GEOLOGY 265 (2009) 148–159
23October 2015
L=0.71”, d=0.35”
q=1.14 mL/min
Mondeville limestone
φ=0.075, k=35.7 mD
T=100 °C, p=120 bar, p_CO2 = 100 bar
24. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Model Observed
FITTED MODEL COMPARISON TO EXPERIMENTS
MENKE 2015 - IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON – PRIVATE COMM
24October 2015
L=0.47”, d=0.16”
q=0.5 mL/min
Salinity = 60000 ppm
Portland limestone
φ=0.045, k=0.096 mD
T=50 °C, p=100 bar
25. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
∆ Pressure
Reference case: no WH’s
EFFECTIVE MODEL RESULTS (LINEAR MODEL, 1METER)
CO2-saturated brine injection: Potential for large injectivity increase
Pure CO2 injection: Short/no wormholes. Negligible impact on injectivity
25October 2015
Pure CO2 injection (1cm/min)CO2-sat brine injection (1cm/min)
WH velocity
Gas saturation
WH length
26. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
EFFECTIVE MODEL RESULTS (RADIAL MODEL, R=50 METER)
26October 2015
Pure CO2 injection (0.5 MT/year)CO2-sat brine injection (0.5 MT/year)
Gas saturation
Injection pressure
Reference case: no WH’s
WH length
Same conclusions as for linear model
Note for pure CO2 injection: WH length decreases with distance (cf. linear: ~constant)
27. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS (RADIAL MODEL)
27October 2015
0.000001
0.000010
0.000100
0.001000
0.010000
0.100000
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
WHvelocity(cm/min),WHlength(cm),
porositychange(m3/m3),permmult-1
gassaturation(m3/m3)
Radial distance (cm)
SAT_GAS
Vwh
Lwh
DPHI
PERMX_MULT -1
0.000001
0.000010
0.000100
0.001000
0.010000
0.100000
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
300 320 340 360 380 400
WHvelocity(cm/min),WHlength(cm),
porositychange(m3/m3),permmult-1
gassaturation(m3/m3)
Radial distance (cm)
SAT_GAS
Vwh
Lwh
DPHI
PERMX_MULT -1
Only thin region in which conditions are favourable for WH growth
Far ahead of gas front gradual increase in acidity → always close to calcite
equillibrium → outside WH regime (too low Da#)
Note: calcite solubility in CO2-saturated brine controls final porosity change
28. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
1
10
100
1000
10000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
PoreVolumestoBreakthrough
Interstitial Fluid Velocity (cm/min)
Base case
Vi -> 0 (ideal compact dissol)
L/A=2
L/A = .67
T=-65
T=30
T=50
HCl=.002617
HCl=.05
HCl=.238
Estaillades exp (L/A = .34)
Model 2D (L/A=15)
best fit to 9.8 cm2/g MoReS
SENSITIVITY TO GWM PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY RANGE
28October 2015
Parameter ranges based on (wide) envelope around
experimental and model results
For radial application, base case L/A ≈1cm-1 based on acid
stimulation radial corefloods and field application experience
29. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
SENSITIVITY RESULTS: IMPACT ON WH LENGTH (1-PHASE)
29October 2015
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
0 20 40 60 80 100
Wormholelength(cm)
Distance from sandface (cm)
ref case HCld238 HCld005 LdAd67
LdA2 Tm30 T50
Strong sensitivity, especially to acid strength parameter
In all cases strong wormhole growth initiating at sandface
Hypothetical WH’s initiating ahead of sandface overtaken (shock front)
After several months of injection
30. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
Weaker sensitivities than in 1-phase case
Conclusions from reference case run appear robust, i.e.: short/no
wormholes (LWH < 0.05 cm)
perm multiplier < 1.01 for LWH < 5cm (2D) or 2cm (3D) [next slides]
SENSITIVITY RESULTS: IMPACT ON WH LENGTH (2-PHASE)
30October 2015
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0 100 200 300 400 500
Wormholelength(cm)
Distance from sandface (cm)
ref case HCld238 HCld005 LdAd67
LdA2 Tm30 T50
31. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
REMARK ON EFFECTIVE PERMEABILITY MULTIPLIER
In pure CO2 injection case WH’s would
initiate away from sandface
Q: how assign effective perm?
Matrix background and high perm
WH channels
Assume random WH initiation pattern
Assume idealised dominant WH’s
Straight channel WH = 2mm
From Poiseuille flow, kWH ≈ 105 D
Control parameters ∆φ and LWH
Considered both 2D and 3D
Considered enhanced connectivity case
(~ WH angle distribution/bifurcations)
31October 2015
32. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
Numerical upscaling
Simple formula gives good fit, for all ∆φ , all LWH, all perm contrasts
𝑘 𝑒𝑓𝑓
𝑘 𝑚
− 1 =
𝑘 𝑔𝑒𝑜𝑚(∆φ)
𝑘 𝑚
− 1
𝐿 𝑊𝐻
𝑐1
𝑐2
(+bounded by harm and arithm)
REMARK ON EFFECTIVE PERMEABILITY MULTIPLIER
32October 2015
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E-06 1.E-05 1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00
k_mult_harm - 1
k_mult_geom - 1
k_mult_arithm - 1
WH_kmult1Min1
WH_kmult2Min1
Fit
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E-06 1.E-05 1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00
k_mult_harm - 1
k_mult_geom - 1
k_mult_arithm - 1
WH_kmult1Min1
WH_kmult2Min1
Fit
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E-06 1.E-05 1.E-04 1.E-03 1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00
k_mult_harm - 1
k_mult_geom - 1
k_mult_arithm - 1
WH_kmult1Min1
WH_kmult2Min1
Series7
Example - perm contrast
𝑘 𝑊𝐻
𝑘 𝑚
= 400, LWH =100mm
log(∆φ)
log
𝐤𝐖𝐇
𝐤𝐦
−𝟏
10-6 1
10-6
10+6
Note: for pure CO2 injection: ∆φ≈10-4
33. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
CONCLUSIONS
At fixed brine rate, gas co-injection causes some suppression of calcite
dissolution patterns.
Modelling indicates limited suppression for any flow rate
Experiment: limited to strong suppression in dominant/conical WH regime
33October 2015
Successfully applied effective GWM model (from acid stimulation literature)
to CO2-brine system (matches fine-scale model and experiments)
Effective model predicts WH can be significant in carbonate reservoirs on
operational timescale (days-years) for CO2 & water co-injection
Good for injectivity
Potentially problematic for well/rock stability (depending on WH pattern)
Effective model predicts negligible wormhole formation for pure CO2
injection (at any scale from core scale to reservoir scale)
WH formation irrelevant for pure CO2 injection projects (‘standard’ CCS)
34.
35. Copyright of Shell Global Solutions International B.V.
REMARK ON REACTION KINETICS VS GWM PARAMETERS
35August 2015