MPLS and GMPLS are technologies for traffic engineering and provisioning. MPLS brings layer 2 switching speeds to layer 3 and supports multiple layer 2 technologies. GMPLS generalizes MPLS to support different network types including packet, TDM, and wavelength services. While MPLS may eventually replace ATM, the migration will likely be gradual due to existing network investments and immaturity of the technologies. The future success of GMPLS depends on proving its benefits for provisioning IP over optical networks.
This document provides an introduction to Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS), including its motivation, basic concepts, components, protocols, operation, advantages, and disadvantages. MPLS combines IP routing with ATM switching to address some of the limitations of IP routing, such as lack of quality of service, while being less complex and expensive than ATM. It works by assigning short, fixed-length labels to IP packets at the edge of the network which are then used for fast packet forwarding within the network core.
IRJET- Performance Analysis of MPLS-VPN and Traditional IP NetworkIRJET Journal
This document analyzes and compares the performance of MPLS-enabled networks and traditional IP networks. It discusses how MPLS protocol performs with OSPF protocol. Nine Cisco routers running IOS version 12.4 were used to test network performance with MPLS and traditional IP routing. The results show how service providers can benefit from MPLS services by increasing network latency and additional benefits obtained from MPLS. Key areas analyzed include latency, utilization in the network. MPLS networks offer benefits like traffic engineering, scalability, VPN services, and ability to carry layer 2 protocols over the MPLS core.
This document provides an overview of MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) including its motivation, basics, components, operation, and advantages/disadvantages. MPLS was created to combine the fast packet forwarding of ATM with the flexibility of IP by using labels to direct network traffic. Key components include label edge routers that apply/remove labels, label switching routers that forward based on labels, label distribution protocols to disseminate label mappings, and label switched paths that represent forwarding equivalency classes. MPLS allows for traffic engineering, quality of service, and network scalability.
MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) simplifies packet forwarding by assigning labels to packets and using these labels for forwarding instead of long network addresses. It allows for traffic engineering and quality of service by establishing Label Switched Paths (LSPs) to direct different types of traffic over specific paths. MPLS supports various Layer 2 and Layer 3 protocols and improves network performance and scalability compared to traditional IP routing. It is widely used to implement virtual private networks (VPNs) across shared infrastructures.
MPLS-TP control plane is beneficial. It brings significant automation and reduced OPEX. Management is provisioned and control plane NEs will co-exist in many networks. Many vendors are building NEs with both management and control plane provisioning.
ptical Networks have been dominated by closed and vendor specific network solutions. The need for greater interoperability, efficiency and simplicity in optical networks are the drivers for the open optical network architecture. We will invite speakers from the industry and vendor communities to discuss and share their views on Open Optical Network architecture. Some of the key issues to discuss are:
- How Open Line Systems and optical white boxes could play a role in building NREN networks.
- Are these technologies mature enough to rely on?
- What are the key issues it is going to solve?
- What are the operational consequences of such dramatic network architecture changes?
- What have standardizations bodies done in the area of Open Optical Network?
- Do we have clear demarcation points between different functional blocks and boxes?
GMPLS extends MPLS to manage additional interface types beyond packet interfaces, such as TDM, wavelength switching, and fiber switching. It allows for establishing connection-oriented LSPs and provides routing, resource discovery, connection management, and restoration functions. GMPLS supports various interface types including packet, TDM, wavelength, and fiber switching. It faces challenges around routing, signaling, and management due to the large number of links and long setup times involved in photonic networks.
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) allows packets to be forwarded along predetermined paths through a network based on short fixed-length labels rather than long variable-length IP addresses. MPLS is used by carriers and large enterprises to implement traffic engineering, virtual private networks, and quality of service through mechanisms like traffic classification and label switching along label switch paths.
This document provides an introduction to Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS), including its motivation, basic concepts, components, protocols, operation, advantages, and disadvantages. MPLS combines IP routing with ATM switching to address some of the limitations of IP routing, such as lack of quality of service, while being less complex and expensive than ATM. It works by assigning short, fixed-length labels to IP packets at the edge of the network which are then used for fast packet forwarding within the network core.
IRJET- Performance Analysis of MPLS-VPN and Traditional IP NetworkIRJET Journal
This document analyzes and compares the performance of MPLS-enabled networks and traditional IP networks. It discusses how MPLS protocol performs with OSPF protocol. Nine Cisco routers running IOS version 12.4 were used to test network performance with MPLS and traditional IP routing. The results show how service providers can benefit from MPLS services by increasing network latency and additional benefits obtained from MPLS. Key areas analyzed include latency, utilization in the network. MPLS networks offer benefits like traffic engineering, scalability, VPN services, and ability to carry layer 2 protocols over the MPLS core.
This document provides an overview of MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) including its motivation, basics, components, operation, and advantages/disadvantages. MPLS was created to combine the fast packet forwarding of ATM with the flexibility of IP by using labels to direct network traffic. Key components include label edge routers that apply/remove labels, label switching routers that forward based on labels, label distribution protocols to disseminate label mappings, and label switched paths that represent forwarding equivalency classes. MPLS allows for traffic engineering, quality of service, and network scalability.
MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) simplifies packet forwarding by assigning labels to packets and using these labels for forwarding instead of long network addresses. It allows for traffic engineering and quality of service by establishing Label Switched Paths (LSPs) to direct different types of traffic over specific paths. MPLS supports various Layer 2 and Layer 3 protocols and improves network performance and scalability compared to traditional IP routing. It is widely used to implement virtual private networks (VPNs) across shared infrastructures.
MPLS-TP control plane is beneficial. It brings significant automation and reduced OPEX. Management is provisioned and control plane NEs will co-exist in many networks. Many vendors are building NEs with both management and control plane provisioning.
ptical Networks have been dominated by closed and vendor specific network solutions. The need for greater interoperability, efficiency and simplicity in optical networks are the drivers for the open optical network architecture. We will invite speakers from the industry and vendor communities to discuss and share their views on Open Optical Network architecture. Some of the key issues to discuss are:
- How Open Line Systems and optical white boxes could play a role in building NREN networks.
- Are these technologies mature enough to rely on?
- What are the key issues it is going to solve?
- What are the operational consequences of such dramatic network architecture changes?
- What have standardizations bodies done in the area of Open Optical Network?
- Do we have clear demarcation points between different functional blocks and boxes?
GMPLS extends MPLS to manage additional interface types beyond packet interfaces, such as TDM, wavelength switching, and fiber switching. It allows for establishing connection-oriented LSPs and provides routing, resource discovery, connection management, and restoration functions. GMPLS supports various interface types including packet, TDM, wavelength, and fiber switching. It faces challenges around routing, signaling, and management due to the large number of links and long setup times involved in photonic networks.
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) allows packets to be forwarded along predetermined paths through a network based on short fixed-length labels rather than long variable-length IP addresses. MPLS is used by carriers and large enterprises to implement traffic engineering, virtual private networks, and quality of service through mechanisms like traffic classification and label switching along label switch paths.
Multi Protocol Label Switching. (by Rahil Reyaz)RAHIL REYAZ
MPLS was developed to address some of the disadvantages of IP and ATM routing. It works by assigning labels to packets at the edge of the network which are then used to forward packets across the core. This label switching allows for faster forwarding than IP routing. MPLS can be used to engineer traffic flows, provide virtual private networks, and transport various layer 2 protocols over an IP or MPLS backbone. While it adds complexity, MPLS improves performance and supports quality of service and network scalability.
This document discusses Voice over MPLS (VoMPLS) as an improved solution for carrying voice traffic compared to Voice over IP (VoIP). It provides an overview of VoMPLS, including how it uses MPLS encapsulation and framing to provide lighter encapsulation than VoIP, while still guaranteeing quality of service. The document also compares IP and MPLS network models, highlighting how MPLS addresses limitations of IP like lack of guaranteed paths, slow routing lookups, and inability to differentiate services. VoMPLS is concluded to be a better future solution for transporting voice due to its inherited advantages from MPLS like reliability, scalability and ease of implementation.
MPLS stands for Multi-Protocol Label Switching, a framework specified by the IETF to efficiently forward, route, and switch traffic through a network. MPLS works at layer 2.5, using label switching to combine the benefits of circuit switching and packet switching. It allows separation of addressing and traffic through VPNs, improving security, bandwidth utilization, and user experience while reducing network complexity and congestion.
At the Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers Expo 2014, Andy Smith of Juniper Networks presented Juniper’s vision and architecture for a cable oriented packet optical core and metro transport system. Access insights and network diagrams in his presentation and learn more in his blog post: http://juni.pr/1rwapCG.
Link labs LTE-M NB-IOT Hype Webinar slidesBrian Ray
Join us as Link Labs VP of Business Development and Cellular IoT Product Director, Glenn Schatz, discusses common misconceptions about LTE Cat-M1 and Cat-NB1 (NB-IoT), as well as how business and product leaders can use these transformative technologies to deliver value to their customers, while avoiding some of the pitfalls companies face when embarking on this journey.
In this Webinar we will cover:
What are the key features and benefits of LTE Cat-M1 and NB-IoT?
What is the state of devices and network availability today?
How do the various low-power modes work (PSM, eDRX, and vendor-specific), and how can they be used in my application?
What are some of the risks and challenges of developing a product with one of these technologies?
How much do these devices cost? What do the data plans look like?
What is in store for the future with 2G and 3G sunsets (both CDMA and GSM) and the emergence of 5G?
This document provides an overview of MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) including:
1) It describes the need for MPLS arising from limitations in traditional IP forwarding and issues running one statmux technology over another.
2) It explains basic MPLS concepts like label switching, label distribution protocols, label edge and switch routers, label switching paths, and forwarding equivalence classes.
3) It outlines the basic working process of MPLS including label encapsulation, lookup, and processing functions like push, pop and swap.
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentIJERD Editor
Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering,
Information Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Automation and Mechatronics Engineering,
Material and Chemical Engineering,
Civil and Architecture Engineering,
Biotechnology and Bio Engineering,
Environmental Engineering,
Petroleum and Mining Engineering,
Marine and Agriculture engineering,
Aerospace Engineering.
A fundamental problem before carriers today is to optimize network cost
and performance by better resource allocation to traffic demands. This is especially
important with the packet infrastructure becoming a critical business resource.
The key to achieving this is traffic engineering (TE), the process of
systematically putting traffic where there is capacity, and backbone
capacity management, the process of ensuring that there is enough network
capacity to meet demand, even at peak times and under failure conditions,
without significant queue buildups.
In this talk, we first focus on the TE techniques and approaches used
in the networks of two large carriers: Global Crossing and
Sprint, which represent the two ends of the traffic engineering spectrum.
We do so by presenting a snapshot of their TE philosophy, deployment strategy,
and network design principles and operation.
We then present the results of an empirical study of backbone traffic
characteristics that suggests that Internet traffic is not self-similar at
timescales relevant to QoS. Our non-parametric approach requires minimal
assumptions (unlike much of the previous work), and allows
us to formulate a practical process for ensuring QoS using backbone
capacity management.
(This latter work is joint with Thomas Telkamp, Global Crossing Ltd. and Arman
Maghbouleh, Cariden Technologies, Inc.)
Application of N jobs M machine Job Sequencing Technique for MPLS Traffic Eng...CSCJournals
This paper discusses Traffic Engineering with Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) in an Internet Service Provider’s (ISP) network. In this paper, we first briefly describe MPLS, Constraint-based Routing, MPLS-TE, N jobs M machine Job sequencing technique and how to implement the job sequencing technique for Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering. And also improve the quality of service of the network, using this technique firstly reduce the congestion for traffic engineering; minimize the packet loss in complex MPLS domain. In small network packet loss is negligible. We used NS2 discrete event simulator for simulate the above work. Keywords: Traffic Engineering, Multi-Protocol Label Switching, Constraint based routing, N jobs M machine Job Sequencing Technique, Qos, MPLS-TE.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
The document provides an overview of MPLS for traffic management. It discusses how MPLS improves on conventional IP networks and ATM by allowing traffic engineering through label switching. Key topics covered include MPLS components, terminology, dynamic LSP setup using RSVP signaling, traffic trunks, and deployment strategies. The goal of MPLS traffic engineering is to increase resource utilization and speed up network convergence.
MPLS is increasingly being used for mobile backhaul networks to support evolving 4G LTE and beyond networks. MPLS provides a unified transport solution for 2G, 3G and 4G networks through proven scalability, resiliency, manageability and quality of service. The Broadband Forum's MPLS in Mobile Backhaul Initiative (MMBI) specifies requirements and architectures for using MPLS in mobile backhaul networks, including support for small cell deployments. Upcoming work will address additional 3GPP releases and further optimize MPLS mobile backhaul networks.
This document discusses introducing IP transport capabilities into the Cello Packet Platform (CPP) telecommunications technology. It notes that voice traffic is being replaced by data traffic, putting new demands on networks to handle both delay-sensitive and packet-oriented traffic. While ATM was considered the solution for quality of service, issues around scalability, administration and cost have emerged. The document outlines six basic principles for IP services in CPP, including embedding an IP router across the main processor cluster and device boards, and fully distributing IPv4/IPv6 forwarding in hardware or software. Introducing IP support in CPP provides benefits to network operators by offering a consistent solution for TDM, ATM and IP transport.
This document compares MPLS protection switching and OSPF rerouting through simulations. It describes MPLS recovery mechanisms like link protection and the Haskin scheme. It also describes OSPF mechanisms like hello protocols, link state advertisements, shortest path first calculations, and main time constants. The document discusses proposed extensions to OSPF like reducing timers and using multipath routing with local failure reactions. It describes the simulation framework used to model these protocols in NS-2 and compare their recovery performance on a sample network. The focus is on restoration speed after a failure.
Mobile Transport Evolution with Unified MPLSCisco Canada
Mobile Service Providers are seeing unprecedented challenges in relation to their Transport architectures with the 3GPP evolution towards IP based Node Bs, LTE (Long Term Evolution) and LTE-Advanced. This presentation will initially discuss the network migration trends and factors that are changing how mobile networks are evolving. A description is provided on Unified MPLS and the current issues that need to be fixed and how this architecture addresses this. A more detailed analysis will then examine the options available for transporting GSM/2G, UMTS/3G traffic and IP/Ethernet Node B deployments and some of factors that need consideration like scalability, resiliency and security. Finally, there is a detailed description of the LTE/LTE - A evolution and the feature requirements made on the transport network. There will be detailed analysis of different LTE models and also some technical enhancements and proposals considered for the implementation of LTE in a Unified MPLS environment.
This document provides an overview of MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) including:
- MPLS uses labels instead of IP addresses to forward packets for benefits like decreased routing overhead and support for non-IP protocols.
- Key MPLS terminology includes label-switched routers that forward packets based on labels, edge routers that impose/remove labels, and label switched paths that define the path through the network.
- The MPLS control plane establishes label switched paths and the data plane uses forwarding based on pre-established labels for faster switching compared to IP routing.
Report for Network Subject at my college at May,2017 and we were suppose to present the operation of MPLS inside the core network of the service provider while the costumer is using a VPN connection
Segment routing is a technology that is gaining popularity as a way to simplify MPLS networks. It has the benefits of interfacing with software-defined networks and allows for source-based routing. It does this without keeping state in the core of the network and needless to use LDP and RSVP-TE.
As SDH/SONET networks are being phased out, power utilities are starting to migrate to future-proof packet networks. This presentation reviews and compares Carrier Ethernet, MPLS and MPLS-TP to help power utilities determine which alternative offers the best fit for the operational needs of their mission-critical applications.
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressionsVictor Morales
K8sGPT is a tool that analyzes and diagnoses Kubernetes clusters. This presentation was used to share the requirements and dependencies to deploy K8sGPT in a local environment.
Multi Protocol Label Switching. (by Rahil Reyaz)RAHIL REYAZ
MPLS was developed to address some of the disadvantages of IP and ATM routing. It works by assigning labels to packets at the edge of the network which are then used to forward packets across the core. This label switching allows for faster forwarding than IP routing. MPLS can be used to engineer traffic flows, provide virtual private networks, and transport various layer 2 protocols over an IP or MPLS backbone. While it adds complexity, MPLS improves performance and supports quality of service and network scalability.
This document discusses Voice over MPLS (VoMPLS) as an improved solution for carrying voice traffic compared to Voice over IP (VoIP). It provides an overview of VoMPLS, including how it uses MPLS encapsulation and framing to provide lighter encapsulation than VoIP, while still guaranteeing quality of service. The document also compares IP and MPLS network models, highlighting how MPLS addresses limitations of IP like lack of guaranteed paths, slow routing lookups, and inability to differentiate services. VoMPLS is concluded to be a better future solution for transporting voice due to its inherited advantages from MPLS like reliability, scalability and ease of implementation.
MPLS stands for Multi-Protocol Label Switching, a framework specified by the IETF to efficiently forward, route, and switch traffic through a network. MPLS works at layer 2.5, using label switching to combine the benefits of circuit switching and packet switching. It allows separation of addressing and traffic through VPNs, improving security, bandwidth utilization, and user experience while reducing network complexity and congestion.
At the Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers Expo 2014, Andy Smith of Juniper Networks presented Juniper’s vision and architecture for a cable oriented packet optical core and metro transport system. Access insights and network diagrams in his presentation and learn more in his blog post: http://juni.pr/1rwapCG.
Link labs LTE-M NB-IOT Hype Webinar slidesBrian Ray
Join us as Link Labs VP of Business Development and Cellular IoT Product Director, Glenn Schatz, discusses common misconceptions about LTE Cat-M1 and Cat-NB1 (NB-IoT), as well as how business and product leaders can use these transformative technologies to deliver value to their customers, while avoiding some of the pitfalls companies face when embarking on this journey.
In this Webinar we will cover:
What are the key features and benefits of LTE Cat-M1 and NB-IoT?
What is the state of devices and network availability today?
How do the various low-power modes work (PSM, eDRX, and vendor-specific), and how can they be used in my application?
What are some of the risks and challenges of developing a product with one of these technologies?
How much do these devices cost? What do the data plans look like?
What is in store for the future with 2G and 3G sunsets (both CDMA and GSM) and the emergence of 5G?
This document provides an overview of MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) including:
1) It describes the need for MPLS arising from limitations in traditional IP forwarding and issues running one statmux technology over another.
2) It explains basic MPLS concepts like label switching, label distribution protocols, label edge and switch routers, label switching paths, and forwarding equivalence classes.
3) It outlines the basic working process of MPLS including label encapsulation, lookup, and processing functions like push, pop and swap.
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentIJERD Editor
Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering,
Information Engineering and Technology,
Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Automation and Mechatronics Engineering,
Material and Chemical Engineering,
Civil and Architecture Engineering,
Biotechnology and Bio Engineering,
Environmental Engineering,
Petroleum and Mining Engineering,
Marine and Agriculture engineering,
Aerospace Engineering.
A fundamental problem before carriers today is to optimize network cost
and performance by better resource allocation to traffic demands. This is especially
important with the packet infrastructure becoming a critical business resource.
The key to achieving this is traffic engineering (TE), the process of
systematically putting traffic where there is capacity, and backbone
capacity management, the process of ensuring that there is enough network
capacity to meet demand, even at peak times and under failure conditions,
without significant queue buildups.
In this talk, we first focus on the TE techniques and approaches used
in the networks of two large carriers: Global Crossing and
Sprint, which represent the two ends of the traffic engineering spectrum.
We do so by presenting a snapshot of their TE philosophy, deployment strategy,
and network design principles and operation.
We then present the results of an empirical study of backbone traffic
characteristics that suggests that Internet traffic is not self-similar at
timescales relevant to QoS. Our non-parametric approach requires minimal
assumptions (unlike much of the previous work), and allows
us to formulate a practical process for ensuring QoS using backbone
capacity management.
(This latter work is joint with Thomas Telkamp, Global Crossing Ltd. and Arman
Maghbouleh, Cariden Technologies, Inc.)
Application of N jobs M machine Job Sequencing Technique for MPLS Traffic Eng...CSCJournals
This paper discusses Traffic Engineering with Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) in an Internet Service Provider’s (ISP) network. In this paper, we first briefly describe MPLS, Constraint-based Routing, MPLS-TE, N jobs M machine Job sequencing technique and how to implement the job sequencing technique for Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering. And also improve the quality of service of the network, using this technique firstly reduce the congestion for traffic engineering; minimize the packet loss in complex MPLS domain. In small network packet loss is negligible. We used NS2 discrete event simulator for simulate the above work. Keywords: Traffic Engineering, Multi-Protocol Label Switching, Constraint based routing, N jobs M machine Job Sequencing Technique, Qos, MPLS-TE.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
The document provides an overview of MPLS for traffic management. It discusses how MPLS improves on conventional IP networks and ATM by allowing traffic engineering through label switching. Key topics covered include MPLS components, terminology, dynamic LSP setup using RSVP signaling, traffic trunks, and deployment strategies. The goal of MPLS traffic engineering is to increase resource utilization and speed up network convergence.
MPLS is increasingly being used for mobile backhaul networks to support evolving 4G LTE and beyond networks. MPLS provides a unified transport solution for 2G, 3G and 4G networks through proven scalability, resiliency, manageability and quality of service. The Broadband Forum's MPLS in Mobile Backhaul Initiative (MMBI) specifies requirements and architectures for using MPLS in mobile backhaul networks, including support for small cell deployments. Upcoming work will address additional 3GPP releases and further optimize MPLS mobile backhaul networks.
This document discusses introducing IP transport capabilities into the Cello Packet Platform (CPP) telecommunications technology. It notes that voice traffic is being replaced by data traffic, putting new demands on networks to handle both delay-sensitive and packet-oriented traffic. While ATM was considered the solution for quality of service, issues around scalability, administration and cost have emerged. The document outlines six basic principles for IP services in CPP, including embedding an IP router across the main processor cluster and device boards, and fully distributing IPv4/IPv6 forwarding in hardware or software. Introducing IP support in CPP provides benefits to network operators by offering a consistent solution for TDM, ATM and IP transport.
This document compares MPLS protection switching and OSPF rerouting through simulations. It describes MPLS recovery mechanisms like link protection and the Haskin scheme. It also describes OSPF mechanisms like hello protocols, link state advertisements, shortest path first calculations, and main time constants. The document discusses proposed extensions to OSPF like reducing timers and using multipath routing with local failure reactions. It describes the simulation framework used to model these protocols in NS-2 and compare their recovery performance on a sample network. The focus is on restoration speed after a failure.
Mobile Transport Evolution with Unified MPLSCisco Canada
Mobile Service Providers are seeing unprecedented challenges in relation to their Transport architectures with the 3GPP evolution towards IP based Node Bs, LTE (Long Term Evolution) and LTE-Advanced. This presentation will initially discuss the network migration trends and factors that are changing how mobile networks are evolving. A description is provided on Unified MPLS and the current issues that need to be fixed and how this architecture addresses this. A more detailed analysis will then examine the options available for transporting GSM/2G, UMTS/3G traffic and IP/Ethernet Node B deployments and some of factors that need consideration like scalability, resiliency and security. Finally, there is a detailed description of the LTE/LTE - A evolution and the feature requirements made on the transport network. There will be detailed analysis of different LTE models and also some technical enhancements and proposals considered for the implementation of LTE in a Unified MPLS environment.
This document provides an overview of MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) including:
- MPLS uses labels instead of IP addresses to forward packets for benefits like decreased routing overhead and support for non-IP protocols.
- Key MPLS terminology includes label-switched routers that forward packets based on labels, edge routers that impose/remove labels, and label switched paths that define the path through the network.
- The MPLS control plane establishes label switched paths and the data plane uses forwarding based on pre-established labels for faster switching compared to IP routing.
Report for Network Subject at my college at May,2017 and we were suppose to present the operation of MPLS inside the core network of the service provider while the costumer is using a VPN connection
Segment routing is a technology that is gaining popularity as a way to simplify MPLS networks. It has the benefits of interfacing with software-defined networks and allows for source-based routing. It does this without keeping state in the core of the network and needless to use LDP and RSVP-TE.
As SDH/SONET networks are being phased out, power utilities are starting to migrate to future-proof packet networks. This presentation reviews and compares Carrier Ethernet, MPLS and MPLS-TP to help power utilities determine which alternative offers the best fit for the operational needs of their mission-critical applications.
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressionsVictor Morales
K8sGPT is a tool that analyzes and diagnoses Kubernetes clusters. This presentation was used to share the requirements and dependencies to deploy K8sGPT in a local environment.
ACEP Magazine edition 4th launched on 05.06.2024Rahul
This document provides information about the third edition of the magazine "Sthapatya" published by the Association of Civil Engineers (Practicing) Aurangabad. It includes messages from current and past presidents of ACEP, memories and photos from past ACEP events, information on life time achievement awards given by ACEP, and a technical article on concrete maintenance, repairs and strengthening. The document highlights activities of ACEP and provides a technical educational article for members.
UNLOCKING HEALTHCARE 4.0: NAVIGATING CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR EFFECTIVE I...amsjournal
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is transforming industries, including healthcare, by integrating digital,
physical, and biological technologies. This study examines the integration of 4.0 technologies into
healthcare, identifying success factors and challenges through interviews with 70 stakeholders from 33
countries. Healthcare is evolving significantly, with varied objectives across nations aiming to improve
population health. The study explores stakeholders' perceptions on critical success factors, identifying
challenges such as insufficiently trained personnel, organizational silos, and structural barriers to data
exchange. Facilitators for integration include cost reduction initiatives and interoperability policies.
Technologies like IoT, Big Data, AI, Machine Learning, and robotics enhance diagnostics, treatment
precision, and real-time monitoring, reducing errors and optimizing resource utilization. Automation
improves employee satisfaction and patient care, while Blockchain and telemedicine drive cost reductions.
Successful integration requires skilled professionals and supportive policies, promising efficient resource
use, lower error rates, and accelerated processes, leading to optimized global healthcare outcomes.
Harnessing WebAssembly for Real-time Stateless Streaming PipelinesChristina Lin
Traditionally, dealing with real-time data pipelines has involved significant overhead, even for straightforward tasks like data transformation or masking. However, in this talk, we’ll venture into the dynamic realm of WebAssembly (WASM) and discover how it can revolutionize the creation of stateless streaming pipelines within a Kafka (Redpanda) broker. These pipelines are adept at managing low-latency, high-data-volume scenarios.
Introduction- e - waste – definition - sources of e-waste– hazardous substances in e-waste - effects of e-waste on environment and human health- need for e-waste management– e-waste handling rules - waste minimization techniques for managing e-waste – recycling of e-waste - disposal treatment methods of e- waste – mechanism of extraction of precious metal from leaching solution-global Scenario of E-waste – E-waste in India- case studies.
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...gerogepatton
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Applications (NLAIM 2024) offers a premier global platform for exchanging insights and findings in the theory, methodology, and applications of NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and their applications. The conference seeks substantial contributions across all key domains of NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and their practical applications, aiming to foster both theoretical advancements and real-world implementations. With a focus on facilitating collaboration between researchers and practitioners from academia and industry, the conference serves as a nexus for sharing the latest developments in the field.
The CBC machine is a common diagnostic tool used by doctors to measure a patient's red blood cell count, white blood cell count and platelet count. The machine uses a small sample of the patient's blood, which is then placed into special tubes and analyzed. The results of the analysis are then displayed on a screen for the doctor to review. The CBC machine is an important tool for diagnosing various conditions, such as anemia, infection and leukemia. It can also help to monitor a patient's response to treatment.
Batteries -Introduction – Types of Batteries – discharging and charging of battery - characteristics of battery –battery rating- various tests on battery- – Primary battery: silver button cell- Secondary battery :Ni-Cd battery-modern battery: lithium ion battery-maintenance of batteries-choices of batteries for electric vehicle applications.
Fuel Cells: Introduction- importance and classification of fuel cells - description, principle, components, applications of fuel cells: H2-O2 fuel cell, alkaline fuel cell, molten carbonate fuel cell and direct methanol fuel cells.
4. Why MPLS?
MPLS stands for: “Multi-Protocol Label Switching”
Goals:
– Bring the speed of layer 2 switching to layer 3
• May no longer perceived as the main benefit: Layer 3 switches
– Resolve the problems of IP over ATM, in particular:
• Complexity of control and management
• Scalability issues
– Support multiple layer 2 technologies
5. Basic Idea
MPLS is a hybrid model adopted by IETF to incorporate best
properties in both packet routing & circuit switching
Forwarding:
Label Swapping
Control:
IP Router
Software
Control:
IP Router
Software
Forwarding:
Longest-match
Lookup
Control:
ATM Forum
Software
Forwarding:
Label Swapping
IP Router MPLS ATM Switch
6. Basic Idea (Cont.)
Packets are switched, not routed, based on labels
Labels are filled in the packet header
Basic operation:
– Ingress LER (Label Edge Router) pushes a label in front of the IP
header
– LSR (Label Switch Router) does label swapping
– Egress LER removes the label
The key : establish the forwarding table
– Link state routing protocols
• Exchange network topology information for path selection
• OSPF-TE, IS-IS-TE
– Signaling/Label distribution protocols:
• Set up LSPs (Label Switched Path)
• LDP, RSVP-TE, CR-LDP
7. MPLS Operation
1a. Routing protocols (e.g. OSPF-TE, IS-IS-TE)
exchange reachability to destination networks
1b. Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
establishes label mappings to destination
network
2. Ingress LER receives packet
and “label”s packets
IP
3. LSR forwards
packets using label
swapping
4. LER at egress
removes label and
delivers packet
IP
8. Main features
Label swapping:
– Bring the speed of layer 2 switching to layer 3
Separation of forwarding plane and control plane
Forwarding hierarchy via Label stacking
– Increase the scalability
Constraint-based routing
– Traffic Engineering
– Fast reroute
Facilitate the virtual private networks (VPNs)
Provide class of service
– Provides an opportunity for mapping DiffServ fields onto an MPLS
label
Facilitate the elimination of multiple layers
10. Outline
Why GMPLS?
GMPLS and MPLS
Control interfaces
Challenges of GMPLS
Several proposed techniques
– Suggested label
– Bi-direction LSP setup
– LMP
Summary
11. GMPLS
GMPLS stands for “Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching”
A previous version is “Multi-Protocol Lambda
Switching”
Developed from MPLS
A suite of protocols that provides common control to
packet, TDM, and wavelength services.
Currently, in development by the IETF
12. Why GMPLS?
GMPLS is proposed as the signaling protocol for optical
networks
What service providers want?
• Carry a large volume of traffic in a cost-effective way
• Turns out to be a challenge within current data network architecture
• Problems:
– Complexity in management of multiple layers
– Inefficient bandwidth usage
– Not scalable
• Solutions: eliminate middle layers IP/WDM
Need a protocol to perform functions of middle layers
IP
ATM
SONET/SDH
DWDM
Carry applications and services
Traffic Engineering
Transport/Protection
Capacity
13. Why GMPLS? (Cont.)
Optical Architectures
A control protocol support both overlay model and peer model
will bring big flexibility
– The selection of architecture can be based on business decision
Peer Model
Overlay Model
UNI UNI
14. Why GMPLS? (Cont.)
What we need? A common control plane
– Support multiple types of traffic (ATM, IP, SONET and etc.)
– Support both peer and overlay models
– Support multi-vendors
– Perform fast provisioning
Why MPLS is selected?
– Provisioning and traffic engineering capability
15. GMPLS and MPLS
GMPLS is deployed from MPLS
– Apply MPLS control plane techniques to optical switches and
IP routing algorithms to manage lightpaths in an optical
network
GMPLS made some modifications on MPLS
– Separation of signaling and data channel
– Support more types of control interface
– Other enhancement
16. Control interfaces
Extend the MPLS to support more interfaces other than packet
switch
– Packet Switch Capable (PSC)
• Router/ATM Switch/Frame Reply Switch
– Time Division Multiplexing Capable (TDMC)
• SONET/SDH ADM/Digital Crossconnects
– Lambda Switch Capable (LSC)
• All Optical ADM or Optical Crossconnects (OXC)
– Fiber-Switch Capable (FSC)
LSPs of different interfaces can be nested inside another
FSC
LSC
LSC
TDMC
TDMC
PSC
17. Challenges
Routing challenges
– Limited number of labels
– Very large number of links
• Link identification will be a big problem
• Scalability of the Link state protocol
• Port connection detection
Signaling challenges
– Long label setup time
– Bi-directional LSPs setup
Management challenges
– Failure detection
– Failure protection and restoration
18. Suggested label
Problem: it takes time for the optical switch to program switch
– Long setup time
Solution:
– Each LSR selects a label (Suggested Label) and signals this label to
downstream LSR, and start program its switch.
reduce LSP setup overhead
Suggested Label = l1
Program Switch l1 X l2
Suggested Label = l2
Reserved Label = l3
Reserved Label = l4
Make sure the programming
request has completed
Request
Program Switch l1 X l2
Request
Map Label = l2
Map Label = l1
No suggested label with suggested label
19. Bi-Directional LSP setup
Problem: How to set up bi-directional LSP?
Solution:
– Set up 2 uni-directional LSP
• Signaling overhead
• End points coordination
– One single message exchange for one bi-directional LSP
• Upstream Label.
Suggested Label = l1
Upstream Label = la
Suggested Label = l2
Upstream Label = lb
Reserved Label = l3
Reserved Label = l4
la lb
l3
l4
20. Link Management Protocol
Problem:
– How to localize the precise location of a fault?
– How to validate the connectivity between adjacent nodes?
Solution: link management protocol
– Control Channel Management
– Link Connectivity Verification
– Link Property Correlation
– Fault Management
– Authentication
21. GMPLS Summary
Provides a new way of managing network resources
and provisioning
Provide a common control plane for multiple layers
and multi-vendors
Fast and automatic service provisioning
Greater service intelligence and efficiency
24. Opinion 1:
MPLS might replace ATM eventually however, the
migration may be slow.
Why MPLS will replace ATM eventually?
– Future network is data-centric
• IP instead of ATM
– MPLS can act ATM’s functionalities
• Traffic engineering using MPLS
• VPNs based on MPLS
– From service provider’s view, MPLS reduces the cost and
provides operational efficiencies
– Scalable
25. Opinion 1 (Cont.)
MPLS deployment status
ISPs deploy/plan to deploy MPLS for traffic engineering and VPNs
– UUNET, AT&T, Equant, Global Crossing, Cable & Wireless and etc..
Equipment vendors are pushing MPLS to the market
Lucent killed its next-generation ATM core switch and switch to MPLS-based
switch
26. Opinion 1 (Cont.)
Why the migration may be slow?
– ATM is still the biggest revenue generator
• The networks are installed already
• Customers care about the price and the services only
– MPLS is more expensive
– ATM can provide most service MPLS can provide
• ISPs care more about revenue than new technologies
– ISPs have to grow their existing business. At this point, they are more
concerned about leveraging existing services rather than migrating to new
technologies for technology’s sake.
– The cost of migration
– MPLS still has problems to be solved
• Interoperability
– It takes time for a protocol to be mature. (usually 5 years)
27. Opinion 2
MPLS cannot COMPLETELY replace ATM
Why?
– Some customers may still choose ATM instead of MPLS
• Traffic engineering of ATM
– ATM provides better QoS than MPLS
– For those customers care about delay and jitter, they may want to
stick to ATM instead of trying a new technology
• ATM based VPN
– Customers maintain the routing table
– MPLS based VPN: entail ISP handling all the routing on behalf of
customers
– Will customer trust ISP?
– The size of the routing table.
28. GMPLS Questions
Does the success of GMPLS depend on the success of MPLS?
– No.
– MPLS and GMPLS are proposed for different purposes.
– GMPLS is proposed to support IP over WDM. After all, a signaling
protocol is needed to perform provisioning.
The future of GMPLS is unclear
– GMPLS certainly will offer operational benefits to carriers
• However, it is not necessarily provide immediate return on investment.
• Need to prove the efficacy
– GMPLS proposes an entirely new way of managing network
resources and provisioning
• More difficult to be adopted
It may take some time to prove GMPLS.
29. Summary
MPLS and GMPLS are promising technologies
ISPs are interested in MPLS and GMPLS
Whether the MPLS will replace ATM or not has no
final answer
The efficacy of GMPLS may take years to prove