Edmundo Tovar Technical University of Madrid
Rosa Cabedo, Marco Kalz, Jaap Walhout, Karel Kreijns, Ge Niellisen, Jonatan Castaño-Muñoz, Teresa Guasch, Anna Espasa, Nikolaos Floratos
OER and MOOCs need competency-based higher educationPaul Bacsich
This presentation argues that a number of innovative technical developments, including OER and MOOCs but also microlearning and innovative forms of assessment, require a new approach to Bologna based primarily on competences
Summary of the "Digitally enhanced learning and teaching in European higher education institutions" survey report. The report maps the situation regarding digitally enhanced learning and teaching at European higher education institutions over the past seven years and is mainly based on data from a survey conducted between April and June 2020 via an online questionnaire to institutional leadership.
The presentation considers the various forms and functions of Higher Education, and focuses in particular on the professional element - i.e. cooperation with employers, and preparation of students for the world of work.
It then considers measures by which this professional element can be quality-checked and controlled, using new quality assurance methodologies developed by the HAPHE and PHExcel projects.
The presentation was delivered to the University of Primorška in Koper, on 4th June 2015.
State of the art of the bologna process towards an international cooperation policy for 2018 and beyond
Patricia Pol - Vice Chair of the Bologna Follow Up group
OER and MOOCs need competency-based higher educationPaul Bacsich
This presentation argues that a number of innovative technical developments, including OER and MOOCs but also microlearning and innovative forms of assessment, require a new approach to Bologna based primarily on competences
Summary of the "Digitally enhanced learning and teaching in European higher education institutions" survey report. The report maps the situation regarding digitally enhanced learning and teaching at European higher education institutions over the past seven years and is mainly based on data from a survey conducted between April and June 2020 via an online questionnaire to institutional leadership.
The presentation considers the various forms and functions of Higher Education, and focuses in particular on the professional element - i.e. cooperation with employers, and preparation of students for the world of work.
It then considers measures by which this professional element can be quality-checked and controlled, using new quality assurance methodologies developed by the HAPHE and PHExcel projects.
The presentation was delivered to the University of Primorška in Koper, on 4th June 2015.
State of the art of the bologna process towards an international cooperation policy for 2018 and beyond
Patricia Pol - Vice Chair of the Bologna Follow Up group
Df e rr355_-_opportunities_for_moo_cs_in_schools_finalIan Koxvold
We at Cairneagle recently wrote a research report for the DfE on the opportunities for MOOCs in compulsory age learning (secondary schools). It includes a potted history of MOOCs, analysis of their components, and an assessment of where and how they might best be deployed.
The presentation analyses a database of good-practice interventions in improving access and participation in Higher Education, collected by the IDEAS project, with the intention of determining if and how technology can contribute towards improving access to, and participation in Higher Education around the world.
The presentation was delivered as part of the UNESCO/ICDE Seminar, "Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education for the Future we Want", on 9th June 2015 at UNESCO Headquarters in Paris.
Inclusiveness has become a strategic question for many higher education institutions across Europe, impacting learning, teaching, research and institutional cultures. This EUA presentation showcases the results of the INVITED project survey including data from 159 higher education institutions in 36 European systems about institutional strategies and measures, success factors, challenges and needs for support. It is of interest to university leaders and managers developing their institutional strategy, staff charged with implementation, researchers and students interested in the topic, as well as policy makers and administrators at European and national levels as they develop new policies for higher education and research.
This PowerPoint was presented at the AVA expert seminar to explain the context of the AVA analysis and list the European Commission's main priorities both on adult education and on validation.
Presentation by Margarita Teresevičienė, Lithuanian Distance and eLearning (LieDM) association for the European Distance Learning Week's final day webinar on "Digital skills in teaching and learning – are we on the right track?" - 11 November 2016
Recording of the discussion is available here: https://eden-online.adobeconnect.com/p80lg2b5akr/
The recording of Deirdre Hodson's presentation is available here: https://eden-online.adobeconnect.com/p9bqnf9swq2/
Higher Education in Norway - Labour Market Relevance and OutcomesEduSkills OECD
The higher education system in Norway generally produces graduates with good skills and labour market outcomes. This success can be largely attributed to Norway’s robust and inclusive labour market and recent higher education reforms to improve quality. However, some Norwegian students have poor labour market outcomes and past success is no guarantee of future success, especially as the Norwegian economy upskills and diversifies. This report provides advice and recommendations to improve the labour market relevance and the outcomes of higher education in Norway. The analysis finds that there is an opportunity to expand work-based learning opportunities, improve career guidance, and do a better job of using innovative learning and teaching practices to improve labour market relevance across the system. The report concludes that Norwegian policy makers have a larger role to play in steering the system. Policy makers can set the conditions for greater labour market relevance by strengthening the mechanism for collaboration between higher education institutions and employers, ensuring better coordination and use of labour market information, and redoubling efforts to support quality learning and teaching. This report was developed as part of the OECD Enhancing Higher Education System Performance project.
Discussions on the simplification of the rules for participation take on strategic relevance in the run-up to the 9th EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon Europe or FP9). This is because they have the potential to increase the added value and improve the efficiency and impact of EU funding. Missed opportunities for impactful simplification directly translate into significant costs at all stages of the project life cycle. As the largest beneficiaries of Horizon 2020, universities are a key stakeholder and unique partner for EU institutions seeking to improve and simplify Framework Programme rules.
In 2016, EUA launched the EUA Member Consultation on the Horizon 2020 Mid-Term Review, which addressed several aspects of Framework Programme simplification and revealed the need for further research into beneficiary opinions. In Autumn 2017, a second guided opinion poll aimed at collecting specific evidence about opportunities to further simplify and enhance the efficiency of the EU Framework Programme was launched. This survey also assessed the impact of changes to the Horizon 2020 Model Grant Agreement introduced in 2017.
Complemented by expert advice from the EUA simplification group, the results of these consultations inform the recommendations put forward in this report, the EUA paper on EU Funding Simplification, and more generally in EUA’s wider campaign for sufficient, sustainable and simple EU Funding for Universities.
No one left behind, uned strategies (staff support webinar)EADTU
by José Luis Aznarte Mellado, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Intelligent Data Management. Llanos Tobarra Abad, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Digital Contents Production. Ángeles Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua IUED Director. Vice-Rectorate of Digitalization and Innovation, UNED. Staff support webinar, 21 September 2020
Presentation giving a brief overview of changes and trends in open education, and the quality related challenges linked to each.
Presented at :
- the 9th European Quality Assurance Forum in Barcelona
- the SEQUENT / Openup Slovenia Seminar on QA in e-learning in Ljubljana, Slovenia
- the NCFHE Seminar on e-learning in Rabat, Malta
Providing an overview of what's happening in Europe regarding MOOCs. Including survey results on what are the reasons to be involved in MOOCs (or decide not to invest in MOOCs)? What are the difference between US and Europe? Can we explain these differences?
Df e rr355_-_opportunities_for_moo_cs_in_schools_finalIan Koxvold
We at Cairneagle recently wrote a research report for the DfE on the opportunities for MOOCs in compulsory age learning (secondary schools). It includes a potted history of MOOCs, analysis of their components, and an assessment of where and how they might best be deployed.
The presentation analyses a database of good-practice interventions in improving access and participation in Higher Education, collected by the IDEAS project, with the intention of determining if and how technology can contribute towards improving access to, and participation in Higher Education around the world.
The presentation was delivered as part of the UNESCO/ICDE Seminar, "Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education for the Future we Want", on 9th June 2015 at UNESCO Headquarters in Paris.
Inclusiveness has become a strategic question for many higher education institutions across Europe, impacting learning, teaching, research and institutional cultures. This EUA presentation showcases the results of the INVITED project survey including data from 159 higher education institutions in 36 European systems about institutional strategies and measures, success factors, challenges and needs for support. It is of interest to university leaders and managers developing their institutional strategy, staff charged with implementation, researchers and students interested in the topic, as well as policy makers and administrators at European and national levels as they develop new policies for higher education and research.
This PowerPoint was presented at the AVA expert seminar to explain the context of the AVA analysis and list the European Commission's main priorities both on adult education and on validation.
Presentation by Margarita Teresevičienė, Lithuanian Distance and eLearning (LieDM) association for the European Distance Learning Week's final day webinar on "Digital skills in teaching and learning – are we on the right track?" - 11 November 2016
Recording of the discussion is available here: https://eden-online.adobeconnect.com/p80lg2b5akr/
The recording of Deirdre Hodson's presentation is available here: https://eden-online.adobeconnect.com/p9bqnf9swq2/
Higher Education in Norway - Labour Market Relevance and OutcomesEduSkills OECD
The higher education system in Norway generally produces graduates with good skills and labour market outcomes. This success can be largely attributed to Norway’s robust and inclusive labour market and recent higher education reforms to improve quality. However, some Norwegian students have poor labour market outcomes and past success is no guarantee of future success, especially as the Norwegian economy upskills and diversifies. This report provides advice and recommendations to improve the labour market relevance and the outcomes of higher education in Norway. The analysis finds that there is an opportunity to expand work-based learning opportunities, improve career guidance, and do a better job of using innovative learning and teaching practices to improve labour market relevance across the system. The report concludes that Norwegian policy makers have a larger role to play in steering the system. Policy makers can set the conditions for greater labour market relevance by strengthening the mechanism for collaboration between higher education institutions and employers, ensuring better coordination and use of labour market information, and redoubling efforts to support quality learning and teaching. This report was developed as part of the OECD Enhancing Higher Education System Performance project.
Discussions on the simplification of the rules for participation take on strategic relevance in the run-up to the 9th EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon Europe or FP9). This is because they have the potential to increase the added value and improve the efficiency and impact of EU funding. Missed opportunities for impactful simplification directly translate into significant costs at all stages of the project life cycle. As the largest beneficiaries of Horizon 2020, universities are a key stakeholder and unique partner for EU institutions seeking to improve and simplify Framework Programme rules.
In 2016, EUA launched the EUA Member Consultation on the Horizon 2020 Mid-Term Review, which addressed several aspects of Framework Programme simplification and revealed the need for further research into beneficiary opinions. In Autumn 2017, a second guided opinion poll aimed at collecting specific evidence about opportunities to further simplify and enhance the efficiency of the EU Framework Programme was launched. This survey also assessed the impact of changes to the Horizon 2020 Model Grant Agreement introduced in 2017.
Complemented by expert advice from the EUA simplification group, the results of these consultations inform the recommendations put forward in this report, the EUA paper on EU Funding Simplification, and more generally in EUA’s wider campaign for sufficient, sustainable and simple EU Funding for Universities.
No one left behind, uned strategies (staff support webinar)EADTU
by José Luis Aznarte Mellado, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Intelligent Data Management. Llanos Tobarra Abad, Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Digital Contents Production. Ángeles Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua IUED Director. Vice-Rectorate of Digitalization and Innovation, UNED. Staff support webinar, 21 September 2020
Presentation giving a brief overview of changes and trends in open education, and the quality related challenges linked to each.
Presented at :
- the 9th European Quality Assurance Forum in Barcelona
- the SEQUENT / Openup Slovenia Seminar on QA in e-learning in Ljubljana, Slovenia
- the NCFHE Seminar on e-learning in Rabat, Malta
Providing an overview of what's happening in Europe regarding MOOCs. Including survey results on what are the reasons to be involved in MOOCs (or decide not to invest in MOOCs)? What are the difference between US and Europe? Can we explain these differences?
At the 6th NICE Conference in Bratislava, Dr Laura Gressnerova and Dr Ivan Prelovsky presented the results of an EU-funded project during a symposium on "Innovative Training Projects & Programmes for Career Professionals"
Flexible Delivery of English & Mathematics with OpenLearn: Impact of Bringing...Robert Farrow
Paper presented at Open Education Global 2019. Until 2012 there was a nascent OER movement developing the UK, supported by government funding and agencies like JISC. This led to a network of OER projects at many higher education providers. With the withdrawal of funding under subsequent governments the OER movement in the UK became restricted to individual efforts alongside hubs of activity (OER World Map, 2019; JISC, 2013). While there is still little governmental support for OER - open access is generally a more consistent focus - there is an increasing interest at policy level in flexible and digital forms of delivery (Orr et al., 2018).
This presentation reports on two projects. Bringing Learning to Life is funded by the UK Department for Education under the Flexible Learning Fund. Flexible Essential Skills is funded by The Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW). Both projects involve making foundational English and Mathematics courses available to a wide range of learners through the OpenLearn repository and LMS (Law & Perryman, 2017). The content is made available as OER for use by a range of learners, including formal students in further education colleges (face-to-face, blended) and non-formal learning scenarios. Both projects are led by The Open University (UK) who provide programme management, content development, platform delivery and evaluation.
Evaluation methodologies are being harmonised in the interests of establishing a basis for comparison between the two datasets. Evaluation results based on original data will be presented. These will include a detailed description of the learners targeted and their needs; perceptions of the key challenges faced; attitudes towards technology and digital skills in adult learners; an exploration of learner motivation, strategy and outcomes; and an examination of the perceptions and views of staff. The impact evaluations combine survey and interview data with OpenLearn analytics and case studies for individual colleges.
Presentation with statements of important aspects and dimensions of MOOC research, as presented during Internal MOOC Confertence, Capri (http://www.di-arezzo.fr/partition/partition+classique/p%C3%A9dagogie+instrumentale/partition-pour-fl%C3%BBte+traversi%C3%A8re/Louis+Drouet/25+Etudes+C%C3%A9l%C3%A8bres/LEDUC00445.html )
Including example of report of macro level Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe ( http://www.eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/OEenM/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe.pdf )
This presentation at the Hellenic Open University Symposium on Open Universities in November 2015 sets out an argument for concern that the forward march of open universities in Europe may be threatened. The need for capacity for Higher Education in the developing countries, proposed by the UN Sustainable Development Goals, will need a radical transformation of quality and student success in order for ODEL and open universities to play a full role.
Embedding MOOCs in University courses: experiences and lessons learnedSólveig Jakobsdóttir
Jakobsdóttir, S., Bjarnason, G., Gunnarsson, K. H. og Kristófersdóttir, D. D. (2016, June). Embedding MOOCs in university courses: experiences and lessons learned. á EDEN 2016 annual conference: Re-imagining learning environments, Budapest.
MOOCs for Opening Up Education
The role of Quality and Openness
Used at Masterclass MESI - 24 September 2014
Some slides used at ICDE-MESI Conference – panel 27 September 2014
Similar to Who is taking European MOOCs and why? A large-scale, cross provider data collection about participants of European Open Online Courses (20)
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Who is taking European MOOCs and why? A large-scale, cross provider data collection about participants of European Open Online Courses
1. Who is taking European MOOCs and why?
A large-scale, cross provider data
collection about participants of European
Open Online Courses
Edmundo Tovar
Open Education Global Conference, Banff April 2015
Technical University of Madrid
Rosa Cabedo, Marco Kalz, Jaap Walhout,
Karel Kreijns, Ge Niellisen, Jonatan
Castaño-Muñoz, Teresa Guasch, Anna
Espasa, Nikolaos Floratos
2. Agenda
I. The Moocknowledge project
II. The research model
III. First data collection and preliminary analysis
IV. The case of Language MOOCs
IV. Invitation to MOOC providers
4. Building a knowledge base
on European MOOC learners.
Aligned with European
policies
ü Europe 2020 strategy: it is essential to concentrate on
smart, sustainable and inclusive growth to remain
competitive and to overcome the current economic crisis.
ü Modernization of the European Education and Training
system, with a special focus on early school leavers and
increasing tertiary education attainment
ü Enhancing both the acquisition of digital competences and
the modernisation of education to generate growth,
employment and social inclusion
ü Opening up Education: Innovative teaching and learning
for all through new technologies and Open Educational
Resources
5. ü Liyanagunawardena, Adams, & Williams (2013)
The learner perspective of MOOCs is
underrepresented
ü Fischer (2014)“both the hype and the
underestimation [of MOOCs are more based on
assumption and beliefs than theoretical
groundings and qualitative and quantitative
data”
ü Many in-depth studies on which these
assumptions are based, are stemming from an
English language context
Building a knowledge base on
European MOOC learners.
Motivation: Lack of data and empirical
evidence
• It is needed to provide a good
picture of the cultural, socio-
economic and motivational
diversity of participants of
European open online courses
6. Building a knowledge base
on MOOC learners. IPTS
Goals
ü To assess the current perspective of learners as
participants of European MOOCs.
ü To collect a large-scale data basis about participants of
(European) MOOCs Longitudinal and systematic data
collection (2014-2016)
ü Addressing intention vs behavior gaps
ü IMPACT of Open Education on labor market conditions
and formal education outcomes
ü Standardized & multilingual questionnaires
ü Audiences:
policy-making by the European Commission
MOOC providers to build open online education
7. Building a knowledge base
on European MOOC learners
ü Initiated and funded by JRC IPTS
ü Partners: OUNL, UPM, UOC
ü Support of GO-GN Network
9. Building a knowledge base on European
MOOC learners. Theoretical background
Research model
ü Other frameworks have guided the construction of a
standardized survey instrument based on items validated
earlier, and on the other hand, they also allow a
systematic analysis of the data at a later stage.
ü These frameworks offer a basis for the prediction of
human social behaviour
10. Building a knowledge base on European
MOOC learners
ü The project aims to establish large-scale cross-provider
data collection on European MOOCs
ü The project aims to deliver insights about the following
variables collected from participants of European Massive
Open Online Courses (MOOCs):
• socio-economic profile,
• lifelong-learning profile,
• ICT-profile,
• MOOC profile,
• Motivation
Impact on study success /job success
16. Results. Economic profile and employer
appreciation
Nearly 45% of the sample is currently employed for wages,
while 18.5 % is currently unemployed. 15.8 % of
the sample are students and 12.7% are self-employed.
17. Results. Economic profile and employer
appreciation
Nearly 50% who have filled in these questions (employed
people) have mentioned that there is some
form of appreciation by the employer available for MOOCs
18. Results. Economic profile and employer
appreciation
Nearly 50% who have filled in these questions (employed
people) have mentioned that there is some
form of appreciation by the employer available for MOOCs
19. Results. Economic profile and employer
appreciation
Around 30% of the employed participants in
MOOCs report that there is some form of
support by their
employer to professional development in
general
Only the 21% of fresh entry-level position are
supported by employers, while approximately
47 % of the managers are supported.
25. Thematic studies: the case of LMOOCs
• Encouraging LifeLong Learning of Languages
• Encouraging among adults
• Recognition of language skills gained through non-
formal education
• Enhancement of professional opportunities
• Integration into a community.
• Leisure activities
26. Thematic studies: the case of LMOOCs
• Suitability in the MOOC format
• Degree of implementation of assessment tools
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: CEFRL
European Language Portolio ELP
Guidelines for learning and teaching languages in the European context
Communicative activities
Linguistic competence: vocabulary, grammar, stress and pronunciation
• Interaction
Learner-learner, learner-teacher/lecturer, learner-content
• Certification
Official certifications
27. PRE and POS Questions
Which interactions are important for your learning process?.
• Learner – Learner interaction
• Learner – Content interaction
• Learner – Expert/Tutor interaction
PRE
POS How much have the following interactions been facilitated within
the MOOC?.
• Learner – Learner interaction
• Learner – Content interaction
• Learner – Expert/Tutor interaction
How satisfied have you been with this MOOC?.POS
28. Phase 2 BUIN Interaction
29,80%
45,27%
40,69%
-5,00%
10,00%
25,00%
40,00%
55,00%
70,00%
85,00%
100,00%
extremely
unimportant
very
unimportant
moderately
unimportant
neutral moderately
important
very
important
extremely
important
Phase 2 (PRE). Interaction
L-L L-C L-ET
31,13%
45,70%
21,19%
-5,00%
10,00%
25,00%
40,00%
55,00%
70,00%
85,00%
100,00%
not at all very little little somewhat to some
extent
to a great
extent
completely
Phase 2 (POS). Interaction
L-L L-C L-ET
30. Cooperation Agreement
• Use the survey instrument to survey
participant experiences in open online courses
of the organization or partners of the
organization.
• The goal of both parties is to collect as many
data as possible from participants of the
MOOC.
• Benchmarking report to the provider if goals
of participation reached.
31. Cooperation Agreement
• The data will be stored in a secure and safe
way in a digital repository.
• The MOOCKnowledge project members IPTS
are allowed to include the data in cross-
provider analysis activities.
32. Cooperation Agreement
• The MOOCknowledge project meets all the
requirements of the the European
Commission’s personal data protection
policy..
• The MOOC provider retains the right to use
the data-set of the MOOC and to produce
scientific output based on this.
33. Thank you for your attention!
Edmundo Tovar
(edmundo.tovar@upm.es)