The document provides details on the integrated development plan for the Mond, Kaki, and Bushgan oil fields in Iran. It includes a timeline for project implementation, background on previous drilling activities at Kaki and Mond fields, details of reservoir stratigraphy, seismic data analysis, and proposed phased development plans. Static and dynamic reservoir modelling was conducted to forecast production from the Upper Sarvak formation, with history matching of well test data from the MD-08 well. A two-well program is proposed for the first phase of development at Mond field.

1. Mond, Kaki, Bushgan Oil Fields
Integrated Development Plan

2. Mond-Kaki-Bushgan Fields – Development Schedule

3. TIME-LINE (between now, signing and effective date)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Signature of Service Contract
Effective Date - start of project
implementation
Reservoir Committee
Finalisation of Contract
Appendices/
Supplementary Studies
Economic Council/NIOC Board Approval

4. Background – Kuh-e-Kaki
The Kuh-e-Kaki-1 (“Ku-1”) well was drilled in 1973
Oil was recovered from carbonate reservoirs in the Miocene Asmari Formation, which
flowed 2,000 BOPD during the drilling operations, 5,000 BOPD in 1977 on production test;
and 2,500 BOPD from the Cenomanian Sarvak Formation during the drilling operations
The KU-1 well is the only well on the structure
Digitised wireline logs, drilling, geology and test reports were used to examined the
potential reservoirs in the Ku-1 well

5. Reservoir Stratigraphy
Asmari - Miocene
Limestones, anhydtite & shales
Fractured & dolomitised
Kaki & Bushgan
Sarvak - Cenomanian
Limestone
Fractured
Kaki & Mond

6. Mond Field – Overview
Multi-reservoir giant accumulation – 560 km²
2D (650 km) and 3D (150 km2) seismic
8 wells – Two wells (MD-06 and MD-08) produced oil
constrained by pump capacity
MD-08 tested in excess of ~ ... bopd from the Sarvak
formation during an 8-day test
Geological & geophysical, core, well test and PVT
studies
6

7. Seismic Line datumed and tied to Outcrop Geology
Sarvak

8. Seismic well tie to Sarvak
MD-08

9. • 11 Horizons were used to develop the seismic and
structural framework
• Surface Geology
– Aghajari(1), Mishan(2)
• 2D Seismic
– Middle Mishan(3), Asmari(4),
– Jahrum(5), Near Top Ilam(6),
– Sarvak(7), Pabdeh(8),
– Kazhdumi(9), Surmeh(10) & Deep
• 3D Seismic
– Jahrum, Pabdeh, Sarvak
– and Surmeh
Regional Chronostratigraphy
10
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
11
4
5
9

10. Integrated Surface Geology & 2D/3D Seismic
Aghajari
outcrop
10

11. DTM Map with Lineaments
Northern Mond
Southern Mond
11

12. North Mond
Sarvak
12

13. Top Sarvak Depth map and 3D Amplitudes
amplitude map
13

14. The Sarvak amplitude map indicates a regular wavelength of
cross-cutting faults/fractures, which could be used as a model for
interpreting the full Mond structure.
Fault Frequency?
MD-7
MD-1MD-4MD-6
MD-5
MD-2
MD-3
14

15. Sequence Strat Review 2D line 737
Sarvak
SB
Mounds (Basin Floor Fans?)
SB
Asmari
Mishan
15

16. Kaki : Data
16
• 10 seismic lines
over Kaki
structure
• One well
• A suite of
borehole well
logs
• No checkshot
data.
16

17. Kaki: Tie to Mond and outcrop geology
17
81055 Version BLine 734Mond
Sarvak
Asmari
Mishan
17

18. 18
Kaki : Cross Faults (Strike line 8150)
Mishan
Asmari
Sarvak
18

19. Kaki : Perspective View of Asmari Reservoir
1919

20. Bushgan : Location
20
• 4 seismic lines over
Bushgan Anticline
• More complicated
structure compared
to Kaki
• One well
• No well logs
• No checkshot data.
20

21. Bushgan : 3D view
2121

22. Bushgan : Strike line - Cross-Faults.
Asmari
Sarvak
22
Field Area
22

23. Bushgan: Asmari structural model (ECL)
2323

24. CF4: Medium-grained Rudist/Echinoderm
wackestone/packstone

25. CF5: Coarse-grained Rudist floatstone/rudstone

26. Upper Sarvak Depositional Environments
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7

27. CF5
CF1
CF4 CF2
CF6 CF3
Fracture Impacts on the Reservoir

28. Reservoir Facies Correlation

29. Reservoir Facies Correlation Across the Field

30. January 24, 2017
30

31. Pickett Plot Method for Extracting ‘’m’’
• No interval with 100% Water saturation present in the Upper Sarvak.
Therefore “m” cannot be obtained from Pickett plot.

32. Integrated Study Philosophy

33. Static and Dynamic Modelling – Upper Sarvak
Dual porosity static model of Upper
Sarvak constructed.
Model was not upscaled for simulation
Simulation model calibrated by history
matching the well test from MD-08
Forecasting and uncertainty analysis
conducted with calibrated simulation
model.
Eclipse Model
Petrel Model
History match of MD-08

34. Mond Field Development
Phased Development
Phase 1 - 2-well program (Mond-08 reentry
+ 1 new well) providing for simultaneous
appraisal, development and production by
artificial lift.
Phase 2 - 10 development wells and using
2 injection wells for water disposal.
Phase 1 Wells
Phase 2 Wells
MD-08
MD-09
MD-16
MD-15
MD-14
MD-17
MD-10
MD-12
MD-13
MD-11
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
From Start of First Phase Production (Years)
OilRate(bopd)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
CumulativeOilProduced(MMStb)
Oil Rate
Cumulative Oil
First Phase
Start of Second Phase

35. Mond Field – Subsurface Uncertainties (Phase 1)