The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here uses 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here use 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal Distances create different rates of time)
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VIII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 2 Planets Velocities Rate expresses the rate of time between these 2 planets
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypotheses tells,
- Where (Earth Velocity / Pluto Velocity) =6.34, because of that, 1 hour of Earth motion be equivalent to 6.34 hours of Pluto Motion.
- By that the hypothesis shows the used rule for planet motion rate of time definition
- This hypothesis is required to answer the question (Can the 1 second period of time for any planet be = the 1 second period of time of another planet?)
- The idea tells us, where the (1 second period of time) is defined based on planet motion features, that may cause the (1 second period) to be different from a planet to another. (otherwise we need to answer, Why the period of 1 second of Earth day = the period of 1 second of Venus day?!)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- 142984 km = 13.1 km/sec (Jupiter velocity) x10921 seconds, this equation tells that, Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km (= Jupiter diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, the Earth moon needs to rotate 13.1 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 142984 km (the Earth moon circumference 10921 km) (The moon needs 27.3 days to rotate around its axis and by that the 13.1 rotations needs 13.1 x 27.3 = 358 days = 1 year)
- 51118 km = 6.8 km/sec (Uranus velocity)x 7511 seconds, this equation tells that, Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km (=Uranus diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, Pluto needs to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 51118 km (Pluto circumference 7511 km) (Pluto 153.3 hours to rotate around its axis and by that the 6.8 rotations needs 6.8 x 153.3 = 1042.5 hours)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why does Saturn move during its day period (10.7 h) a distance = (373644 km) = 98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km)?
The Question Explanation
- Better we need to ask (Why should Saturn move in its day period a distance = its circumference?), what geometrical effect can be produced by that?
- If a planet moves during its day period a distance = its Circumference, that creates a proportionality between this planet circumference, its orbital circumference, its day period and its orbital period, showing this planet motion data is defined based on each other.
- So, if a planet moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, that may create one question controls these 4 planet motion data.
- Saturn gives us this chance, but not accurately, because Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 98.67% of its Circumference (there's a difference between the 2 distances =1.33%)
- Where the difference is so small, the same result can be produced but with some complexities.
- The paper analyzes Saturn motion data to see if such equation can be defined and what difficulties are still found in its way.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
- Planet Orbital Period, Rotation Period And Day Period (Planet Cycles Periods), Are Defined Depending On Each Other And On Other Planets Cycles Periods.
- 1 Hour On Mercury = 1 Solar Day On Earth (Venus Also uses This Rate Of Time)
- The Solar Group Is One Machine Works As A Mechanical Clock- Transports The Motion From Planet To Another With Different Rates Of Time, Aiming To Enable Light Motion During 1 Second Period To Cause A Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day
Abstract
Solar Data Analysis tells us that…… Mercury has 2 velocities
1st Velocity = 47.4 km/sec which is registered in NASA Planetary Fact Sheet
2nd Velocity= 47.8 km/sec which is necessary velocity to cover Mercury Orbital Circumference 57.9 mkm x 2π= 364 mkm in Mercury Orbital Period 88 days
The difference between both velocities = 1%
Why are there 2 velocities for the same Planet? And how that can be possible?
This question is similar to the old question concerning Newton 3rd Law "why for Each Action there's reaction equal in value and opposite in direction? In brief… why the forces are created in double?
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here use 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal Distances create different rates of time)
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VIII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 2 Planets Velocities Rate expresses the rate of time between these 2 planets
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypotheses tells,
- Where (Earth Velocity / Pluto Velocity) =6.34, because of that, 1 hour of Earth motion be equivalent to 6.34 hours of Pluto Motion.
- By that the hypothesis shows the used rule for planet motion rate of time definition
- This hypothesis is required to answer the question (Can the 1 second period of time for any planet be = the 1 second period of time of another planet?)
- The idea tells us, where the (1 second period of time) is defined based on planet motion features, that may cause the (1 second period) to be different from a planet to another. (otherwise we need to answer, Why the period of 1 second of Earth day = the period of 1 second of Venus day?!)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- 142984 km = 13.1 km/sec (Jupiter velocity) x10921 seconds, this equation tells that, Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km (= Jupiter diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, the Earth moon needs to rotate 13.1 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 142984 km (the Earth moon circumference 10921 km) (The moon needs 27.3 days to rotate around its axis and by that the 13.1 rotations needs 13.1 x 27.3 = 358 days = 1 year)
- 51118 km = 6.8 km/sec (Uranus velocity)x 7511 seconds, this equation tells that, Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km (=Uranus diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, Pluto needs to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 51118 km (Pluto circumference 7511 km) (Pluto 153.3 hours to rotate around its axis and by that the 6.8 rotations needs 6.8 x 153.3 = 1042.5 hours)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why does Saturn move during its day period (10.7 h) a distance = (373644 km) = 98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km)?
The Question Explanation
- Better we need to ask (Why should Saturn move in its day period a distance = its circumference?), what geometrical effect can be produced by that?
- If a planet moves during its day period a distance = its Circumference, that creates a proportionality between this planet circumference, its orbital circumference, its day period and its orbital period, showing this planet motion data is defined based on each other.
- So, if a planet moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, that may create one question controls these 4 planet motion data.
- Saturn gives us this chance, but not accurately, because Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 98.67% of its Circumference (there's a difference between the 2 distances =1.33%)
- Where the difference is so small, the same result can be produced but with some complexities.
- The paper analyzes Saturn motion data to see if such equation can be defined and what difficulties are still found in its way.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
- Planet Orbital Period, Rotation Period And Day Period (Planet Cycles Periods), Are Defined Depending On Each Other And On Other Planets Cycles Periods.
- 1 Hour On Mercury = 1 Solar Day On Earth (Venus Also uses This Rate Of Time)
- The Solar Group Is One Machine Works As A Mechanical Clock- Transports The Motion From Planet To Another With Different Rates Of Time, Aiming To Enable Light Motion During 1 Second Period To Cause A Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day
Abstract
Solar Data Analysis tells us that…… Mercury has 2 velocities
1st Velocity = 47.4 km/sec which is registered in NASA Planetary Fact Sheet
2nd Velocity= 47.8 km/sec which is necessary velocity to cover Mercury Orbital Circumference 57.9 mkm x 2π= 364 mkm in Mercury Orbital Period 88 days
The difference between both velocities = 1%
Why are there 2 velocities for the same Planet? And how that can be possible?
This question is similar to the old question concerning Newton 3rd Law "why for Each Action there's reaction equal in value and opposite in direction? In brief… why the forces are created in double?
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (modified) (Revised)
Abstract
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.6 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Why Does Mercury Day Period Need 5040 Seconds To Be 176 Solar Days Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon orbital inclination causes Mercury Day Period to be less than 176 solar days with 84 minutes
Paper Argument
- The paper shows that there are different interactions of motions between the planets regardless the distances between them..
- Specifically,
- The paper claims that, Uranus has a great effect on the inner plants motions and the Earth moon orbital inclination effect on Mercury Day Period is one example of different results cause by Uranus motion interaction with the inner planets motions
- The Earth moon orbital inclination effect causes Mercury day period to be less than 176 solar days with 5040 seconds.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (3)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Be A Clock?
Abstract
Paper question
Can The Solar System Be A Clock?
The question explanation
- The 1 second period of time must be different from a solar planet to another, because the 1 second period depends on the planet motion data that necessitates this period of time to be different from a planet to another.
- The solar planets motions harmony must depend on unified units.
- That necessitates to create different rates of time for the planets motions, and also necessitates these different rates of time to be complementary with one another creating one general rate of time.
- Let's use the Earth as example, Earth day =24 hours, but Earth rotation period =23.9 hours, the difference between these 2 periods forces us to divide the one day into 24 hours, and the hour into 60 minutes and into 3600 seconds.
- Means, the 1 second period depends on Earth motion data. Because of that, the 1 second period of time can't be equal period for all planets. But the planets motions general harmony hide this fact by creating one unified rate of time used by the solar system motion. that's why the solar system should be considered as a clock.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the claim and explains the clock work system.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following
1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion
2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day)
4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis
5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day) is used in the solar system motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.573 mkm = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
- The paper claims, the previous data is found because Earth and Pluto motions are used to create the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
- That means, 1 hour of Earth motion = 24 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate needs Mercury, Venus and the moon cooperation to be created.
- This idea can be supported by the fact that (The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) =2.573 mkm = Earth motion distance during its day = Pluto motion distance during its day period (153.3 hours)
- The rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a proof for the motion transportation through the solar planets – that means- the motion is transported from a planet to another planet as among gears.
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the creation of the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a great clock, its basic task is to uses a motion of 1 second (a light beam motion) to produce a motion of 1 solar day ( a planet motion)
- Because of that, the rate of time 1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours is used
- I claim, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- This rate of time is produced by geometrical mechanism and interaction between the planets motions – for that – the light beam velocity isn't used to produce this rate directly by Lorentz Transformations
- This data is so important because it tells there's another method by which a different rate of time can be created – we discuss this method in this paper and tries to see how this different rate of time is produced by a motion transportation among the planets as among the gears
- The paper uses Venus rotation period as a platform for its discussion to explain ho this rate of time be created
- This rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a part of the great rate of time (1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day) – we discuss in this paper the rate (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 days Cycle (=79.2 hours) causes the following results:
o It causes Uranus Orbital Period to be = 30589 solar days
o It causes Mercury Orbital Period to be = 88 solar days
o It causes Mercury Day Period to be = 4222.6 hours
The hypothesis Explanation:
- An Interaction is done between Jupiter, Uranus and Mercury Motions.. from this interaction the previous data are produced in addition to a great effect is found on the Earth moon motion and creation data.
- This interaction is an essential one in the solar system because its results are so powerful effective on the solar system geometrical structure
- This interaction provides a powerful argument because these planets gravities effect on each other aren't so strong, But planets motions data analysis proves clearly and strongly this interaction which from a questionable point to answer (How these planets can create this interaction –if it's found really- through these huge distances between each other?)
Paper objective:
- The paper discusses the data to prove that this data is produced based on this interaction and can't be created if this interaction isn't occurred.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000km/sec?
Because
- The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment- The Main Hypothesis)
- The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement
- Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence
- Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence
What does that mean? ..i.e.
- If there's a light velocity higher than C we can't realize it, why? Because Our Body defines only this specific time which is produced from this specific light
Now we can see much better
- Why we can't understand easily the solar System geometry? Because NOT all data is available for us! And why NOT? Because Our Body Connected Us To Specific Category Of Data…
o So we connected to specific light beam (standard velocity C)
And
o We connected to specific time defined by our body changes
So the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct
No Velocity higher than C is available in our Universe
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
-The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The moon orbital triangle is created to explain that, many data in the moon orbit is created based on Pythagoras rule
- This paper provide the moon orbital triangle to be analyzed geometrically as deep as possible
Paper Claim
- The moon motion depends on Pythagoras triangle, and because of that the moon orbital triangle analysis can solve many basic questions in the moon motion
- The moon orbital triangle proves that, there's another force effect on the moon motion, this force is seen in (Point A) in the moon orbital triangle.
Paper question
- Why the moon orbital triangle is a significant triangle?
- Because the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its motion points, why? because the moon daily displacement isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit – instead – the moon uses part of this displacement to be the real displacement suitably to the orbit radius – that's why the moon orbital triangle is a cornerstone in the moon motion definition –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
The Hypothesis Explanation
The different rates of time is the basic method, used by the solar system geometry to produce the sun rays – to see this hypothesis depth we need to review the sun rays creation process, let's do that in following:
- The sun rays energy isn't created by any nuclear interactions.
- The sun rays energy is produced by the solar planets motions energies concentration.
- The planets motions energies total are concentrated on one point (the sun point) and because the sun rate of time is different from Earth (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – because of that- the energy which is produced during a complete year can be used in one day only and by that the mechanical waves energies can be transferred into light waves energies and produce the sun rays.
- That tells us, the sun rays energy source is the planets motions energies
But
- The main cornerstone in this theory is, the different rates of time….
Because of that
- We need to prove, There Are Different Rates Of Time In The Solar System
- This paper tries to prove this hypothesis…
Paper Contents
(1) Introduction
(2) The Different Rates Of Time Using In The Solar System Motion
(3) Venus effect to produce different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VI)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 24 hours of Uranus Motion = 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.35 hour of Venus Motion = 1.6 hours of Earth Motion= 2 hours of Mars Motion = 48 hours of the moon motion = 4.62 hours of Pluto Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is A Great Clock
- The Motion is transported from one planet to another
- The motion transportation is done by creation different rates of time among the planets motions
- The planets different rates of time depends on the planets velocities
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to create another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
Paper objective
- The paper aims to prove that, the mentioned planets use the mentioned rates of time in their motions relative to one another
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon motion basic equation (modified) (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Motion Basic Equation (modified) (Revised)
Abstract
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.6 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt (6.7 degrees) declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.6 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Why Does Mercury Day Period Need 5040 Seconds To Be 176 Solar Days Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon orbital inclination causes Mercury Day Period to be less than 176 solar days with 84 minutes
Paper Argument
- The paper shows that there are different interactions of motions between the planets regardless the distances between them..
- Specifically,
- The paper claims that, Uranus has a great effect on the inner plants motions and the Earth moon orbital inclination effect on Mercury Day Period is one example of different results cause by Uranus motion interaction with the inner planets motions
- The Earth moon orbital inclination effect causes Mercury day period to be less than 176 solar days with 5040 seconds.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (3)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Be A Clock?
Abstract
Paper question
Can The Solar System Be A Clock?
The question explanation
- The 1 second period of time must be different from a solar planet to another, because the 1 second period depends on the planet motion data that necessitates this period of time to be different from a planet to another.
- The solar planets motions harmony must depend on unified units.
- That necessitates to create different rates of time for the planets motions, and also necessitates these different rates of time to be complementary with one another creating one general rate of time.
- Let's use the Earth as example, Earth day =24 hours, but Earth rotation period =23.9 hours, the difference between these 2 periods forces us to divide the one day into 24 hours, and the hour into 60 minutes and into 3600 seconds.
- Means, the 1 second period depends on Earth motion data. Because of that, the 1 second period of time can't be equal period for all planets. But the planets motions general harmony hide this fact by creating one unified rate of time used by the solar system motion. that's why the solar system should be considered as a clock.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the claim and explains the clock work system.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following
1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion
2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day)
4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis
5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day) is used in the solar system motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.573 mkm = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
- The paper claims, the previous data is found because Earth and Pluto motions are used to create the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
- That means, 1 hour of Earth motion = 24 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate needs Mercury, Venus and the moon cooperation to be created.
- This idea can be supported by the fact that (The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) =2.573 mkm = Earth motion distance during its day = Pluto motion distance during its day period (153.3 hours)
- The rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a proof for the motion transportation through the solar planets – that means- the motion is transported from a planet to another planet as among gears.
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the creation of the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a great clock, its basic task is to uses a motion of 1 second (a light beam motion) to produce a motion of 1 solar day ( a planet motion)
- Because of that, the rate of time 1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours is used
- I claim, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- This rate of time is produced by geometrical mechanism and interaction between the planets motions – for that – the light beam velocity isn't used to produce this rate directly by Lorentz Transformations
- This data is so important because it tells there's another method by which a different rate of time can be created – we discuss this method in this paper and tries to see how this different rate of time is produced by a motion transportation among the planets as among the gears
- The paper uses Venus rotation period as a platform for its discussion to explain ho this rate of time be created
- This rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a part of the great rate of time (1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day) – we discuss in this paper the rate (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 days Cycle (=79.2 hours) causes the following results:
o It causes Uranus Orbital Period to be = 30589 solar days
o It causes Mercury Orbital Period to be = 88 solar days
o It causes Mercury Day Period to be = 4222.6 hours
The hypothesis Explanation:
- An Interaction is done between Jupiter, Uranus and Mercury Motions.. from this interaction the previous data are produced in addition to a great effect is found on the Earth moon motion and creation data.
- This interaction is an essential one in the solar system because its results are so powerful effective on the solar system geometrical structure
- This interaction provides a powerful argument because these planets gravities effect on each other aren't so strong, But planets motions data analysis proves clearly and strongly this interaction which from a questionable point to answer (How these planets can create this interaction –if it's found really- through these huge distances between each other?)
Paper objective:
- The paper discusses the data to prove that this data is produced based on this interaction and can't be created if this interaction isn't occurred.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why there's No velocity higher than Light Velocity C =300000km/sec?
Because
- The Matter is created from light beams coherence (according to Young Experiment- The Main Hypothesis)
- The Time is created as the Matter Changing measurement
- Our body (matter) is produced by the same method, from this light beams coherence
- Our bodies are connected with specific Light velocity and specific time rate because our bodies are produced by specific Light Beams coherence
What does that mean? ..i.e.
- If there's a light velocity higher than C we can't realize it, why? Because Our Body defines only this specific time which is produced from this specific light
Now we can see much better
- Why we can't understand easily the solar System geometry? Because NOT all data is available for us! And why NOT? Because Our Body Connected Us To Specific Category Of Data…
o So we connected to specific light beam (standard velocity C)
And
o We connected to specific time defined by our body changes
So the Special Theory of Relativity is Correct
No Velocity higher than C is available in our Universe
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
-The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The moon orbital triangle is created to explain that, many data in the moon orbit is created based on Pythagoras rule
- This paper provide the moon orbital triangle to be analyzed geometrically as deep as possible
Paper Claim
- The moon motion depends on Pythagoras triangle, and because of that the moon orbital triangle analysis can solve many basic questions in the moon motion
- The moon orbital triangle proves that, there's another force effect on the moon motion, this force is seen in (Point A) in the moon orbital triangle.
Paper question
- Why the moon orbital triangle is a significant triangle?
- Because the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its motion points, why? because the moon daily displacement isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit – instead – the moon uses part of this displacement to be the real displacement suitably to the orbit radius – that's why the moon orbital triangle is a cornerstone in the moon motion definition –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
The Hypothesis Explanation
The different rates of time is the basic method, used by the solar system geometry to produce the sun rays – to see this hypothesis depth we need to review the sun rays creation process, let's do that in following:
- The sun rays energy isn't created by any nuclear interactions.
- The sun rays energy is produced by the solar planets motions energies concentration.
- The planets motions energies total are concentrated on one point (the sun point) and because the sun rate of time is different from Earth (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – because of that- the energy which is produced during a complete year can be used in one day only and by that the mechanical waves energies can be transferred into light waves energies and produce the sun rays.
- That tells us, the sun rays energy source is the planets motions energies
But
- The main cornerstone in this theory is, the different rates of time….
Because of that
- We need to prove, There Are Different Rates Of Time In The Solar System
- This paper tries to prove this hypothesis…
Paper Contents
(1) Introduction
(2) The Different Rates Of Time Using In The Solar System Motion
(3) Venus effect to produce different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VI)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 24 hours of Uranus Motion = 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.35 hour of Venus Motion = 1.6 hours of Earth Motion= 2 hours of Mars Motion = 48 hours of the moon motion = 4.62 hours of Pluto Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is A Great Clock
- The Motion is transported from one planet to another
- The motion transportation is done by creation different rates of time among the planets motions
- The planets different rates of time depends on the planets velocities
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to create another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
Paper objective
- The paper aims to prove that, the mentioned planets use the mentioned rates of time in their motions relative to one another
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VI) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 24 hours of Uranus Motion = 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.35 hour of Venus Motion = 1.6 hours of Earth Motion= 2 hours of Mars Motion = 48 hours of the moon motion = 4.62 hours of Pluto Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is A Great Clock
- The Motion is transported from one planet to another
- The motion transportation is done by creation different rates of time among the planets motions
- The planets different rates of time depends on the planets velocities
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to create another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
Paper objective
- The paper aims to prove that, the mentioned planets use the mentioned rates of time in their motions relative to one another
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why Pluto Day Period = 153.3 hours?
The question explanation
- Pluto day period =153.3 hours
- Where the outer planets days periods are (9.9 h, 10.7 h, 17.2 h and 16.1 h).
- That shows Pluto day period = 3 folds their total together!
- Why Pluto has this long day period and how it's defined?
- Also
- Pluto (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km = Earth motion distance during the solar day 2574720 km (error 1%)
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km = Pluto motion distance during its day period 2593836 km (Zero Error)
- Can these distances equality be a reason behind Pluto day definition? Where
- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity/ Pluto velocity)
- Can this data be created based on a geometrical rules, depending on each other?
- Pluto motion distance during a solar day/ the Earth moon displacement daily) = (the Earth moon day period/ Pluto day period).
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The paper adds more data to prove the same concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Let's review this concept argument in following:
-Why did I suggest that "Planet Motion depends on light Motion?"
-The main reason is that
-"Planet Motion Shows Geometrical Rules And Interactions Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics"
-Planet Motion shows complex geometrical structures can't be found in the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (II)" I have provided 9 geometrical features are observed in the solar system geometry which can't be found by the rigid body motion mechanics
And
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (III)" I have provided many questions and a theoretical investigation concerning this same concept
In this paper I provide more data which can support the concept clearly
Now … If really "Planet Motion depends On Light Motion" that will explain clearly Plato cave because we see the planets motions while the light motions are found hidden behind these planets motions and because of that we are prisoners in the cave
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II) Gerges francis
Paper Question
How to use the different rates of time ( if found) in the solar system motion?
The previous paper suggested that, 2 different basic rates of time are found in the solar system which are ( 1s is equivalent to 86400 s) and (1 s equivalent to 365.25 s)
To produce these 2 rates of time, we have discovered of different rates of time are used between the planets relative to each other – for example (Earth day =29.53 days on the moon) and (Earth day = 153.3 hours on Pluto)
So, that discussion left us with some Chaos in time rate definition – where we simply don't what rate of time is used by any planet and why!
So the current paper provides one basic question – trying to know how to use all these rates of time – regardless how these are created –
But
The question in fact has one more deep aim, let's try to explain that in following:
- The basic rule by which I have defined the different rates of time is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) – based on this rule – Earth moves per its day a distance = moon motion distance during 29.53 days and because of that I have supposed that Earth day = 29.53 days on the moon – Also this same distance = Pluto motion distance during its day (153.3 hours), so 1 day of Earth = 153.3 hours of Pluto!
- This is the way by which I have defined the different rates of time for light and planet motion – it's one clear rule -
But
- Is this rule a correct one?! how to understand this question?! Let's give it some consideration in following……
- The solar system is a clock as I claimed, where I suppose that, light motion for 1 second causes planet to move 1 solar day, how that is occurred?!
- By planets different rates of time, i.e. 1 second of a planet is equivalent to 1 minute to another planet, then 1 minute of this planet is equivalent to 1 hour of a third planet, then 1 hour of it is equivalent to 1 day of fourth planet, and then equivalent to one month or one year…..etc
- i.e. the different rates of time are not found by some random machine to define any rate to any planet- instead – it defined specific rate for specific planet to create specific task – that's the aim of the different rates of time creation – it's a machine of time (A Clock)
-So, we should test our conclusions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper Questions
- The previous paper (Earth and Moon Motions Interaction) left us with 3 questions which are:
- (1st Question) If the Earth moon moves daily 2.58 mkm why we don't see it?
- (2nd Question) If the moon motion distance (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be (2.41 mkm), and the moon has to move 2.58 mkm to save its motion companying with Earth, how the moon creates the different distance (0.17 mkm) …..
o This question answered told us that, Venus Day Period (116.7 days) effects on the moon motion to causes the moon daily displacement 88000 km to be = (2 x 88000 km =0.17 mkm)
o But no geometrical mechanism is suggested to explain how Venus day does this task…
- (3rd Question) – Is Metonic Cycle a vertical motion?
Also
- Many points were necessary to be discussed in the previous paper, but I couldn't because we have stopped with the 2nd question (by what geometrical mechanism does Venus Day Period effect on the moon daily displacement 88000 km to make it equal 170000 km?)
- So let's discuss this question immediately…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Creation and Motion Theory.pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Creation and Motion Theory
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
A Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 mkm /Sec Be Found In The Solar System
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- Matter and space are created out of light beam, but matter doesn't spate its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time
- The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 million km per second
- The Solar Planets move one unified motion and use different rates of time for their motions – means- the second period of time is different from one planet to another
- The Solar Group be similar to a mechanical clock each planet motion defines part of Its Unified General Rate Of Time
- The planets orbital and internal distances be created in one network form depends on one geometrical design and not as individual distances. (The Solar System Distances Be Similar To A Chess Board)
- There's a continuum effect found through the solar system data as a result for its creation out of one light beam
- The light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s) is created based on the planets motions, later after the solar planets be created and moving –as a result we conclude – The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Motions Concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
i.e.
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Or
Planet is a result of light Motion
Where
Planet & light Motion Interactions depends on this concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
Which this paper tries to prove
This paper completes the discussion in the previous one
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper question
-Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during (24 hours) a distance = 2574720 km
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 378675 seconds a distance = 2574990 km
- Mars (24.1km/s) moves during 29.53 hours a distance = 2562023 km
- Why These Distances Are Equal Approximately? (The difference 1%)
Paper Claim
- The paper claims, these distances are equal to enable Pluto to move during its day period a distance = the moon displacements total during its day period, because the equality of these distances has a geometrical necessity for the solar system motion.
- The claim depends on a new description for the solar system which is:
o The solar group is one building and each planet is a part of it
o The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages
o The solar group is one machine can be considered as (A Great Clock)
o The solar planets data is created depending on one another.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)Gerges francis
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
Abstract
Paper question
- Can The Motion Be Transported From A Solar Planet To Another?
The Question Explanation
- The planets use (8 days and 6 days) cycles and these cycles refers to a form of the transportation of motion among the solar planets
- The motion transportation is done based on different rates of time found among the planets
- Based on that
- 1 hour of Mercury motion be equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- And because
- (Venus velocity / Mercury velocity) = 0.738
- 1 hour of Venus motion be equivalent to 17.7 hours of Uranus motion
- This claim should be the paper hypothesis, where the paper tries to prove this fact
- By proving the different rates of time (specifically 1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion), that gives a reference of mutual effect of planets motion on one another which gives support for the motion transposition claim.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (II)Gerges francis
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
We complete our discussion to answer this question
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –23rd
April 2021
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to
24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by
this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear
to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different
rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here uses 4
planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and
equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal
Distances create different rates of time)
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Paper objective
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are truth and be used in these
planets motions
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
1- Introduction
- Paper hypothesis tells (48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury
motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto
motion)
- We have discussed before the theoretical description which explains how the solar
group can be a great clock
- Based on that, this paper interests for the suggested rates discussion and prove,
- Because it's a good test for this rule if it really can be a fact
- The 4 planets motions shows different rates of time relative to the moon motion
and what we need to do is that, to test, if these same rates of time are used between
these planets motions among each other –
- Then we need to know what relationship can be suggested between the planet
velocity and its rate of time – or –simply – why different velocities can causes
different rates of time
- And then we need to answer the important question (how the planet can create a
different rate of time by its low velocity? And without needs to use light velocity
of high velocity motion?)
- The paper tries to tell that, this features (which is the rate of time creation by low
velocity) depends on the motion transportation – and both expression depends on
each other needs clear definition - but the short meaning is that – when a motion
be transported from a planet to another planet this transportation of motion is done
by creation of a different rate of time –
- Let's start our discussion trying to see as possible how this process is done and if it
can be a fact
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
2- The Earth Moon Rate Of Time
2-1 The Rate Of Time Between The Moon And Mercury Motions
2-2 The Rate Of Time Between The Moon And Mars Motions
2-3 The Rate Of Time Between The Moon And Pluto Motions
2-4 The general Rate Of Time among these 4 planets
2-5 Planet velocity effect on its rate of time
2-1 The Rate Of Time Between The Moon And Mercury Motions
(1)
742 mkm = 88000 km (the moon daily displacement) x 8432 solar days
(2)
742 mkm x 2 = 4.095 mkm (Mercury velocity per solar day) x 365.25 solar days
II – Discussion
Equation No. (1)
742 mkm = 88000 km (the moon daily displacement) x 8432 solar days
- Equation no (1) tells that,
o The moon displacement per solar day during 8432 days be = 742 mkm
o 8432 solar days of the moon motion
o But
o Let's suppose each 2 days of this (8432 days) = 1 hour of Mercury motion
o 8432 hours = 2 x 175.94 days x 23.96 hours
o 175.94 solar days = Mercury Day Period
o 23.9 hours = Earth rotation period
o Where (23.96/23.9) = (361 degrees /360 degrees)
o Based on that, Two Solar Days Of The Moon Motion Be Equivalent To
One Hour Of Mercury Motion
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
o This explanation shows the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 48 hours)
and shows how this rate works – in our discussion – it works between the
moon daily displacement (motion) and Mercury Motion
Equation No. (2)
742 mkm x 2 = 4.095 mkm (Mercury velocity per solar day) x 365.25 solar days
- Equation no (b) tells that,
- Mercury moves during 365.25 solar days a distance = 742 mkm x 2
- Let's divide the discussion into basic points as following
o (1st
Point)
o We have to suppose that the periods 365.25 days and (2 x 175.94 days) are
equivalent and by that 1 hour of Mercury motion will be equivalent to 48
hours of the moon motion
o (Why the periods 365.25 days and (2 x 175.94 days) are equivalent? The
question should be discussed later
o (2nd
Point)
o The rule which controls this process tells (Equal Distances Create
Different Rates Of Time) – that means – If Mercury moves 742 mkm and
not 2 x 742 mkm – that will cause the rate of time to be 1 hour of Mercury
motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion – but because Mercury
moves 2 x 742 mkm that causes the rate to be 1 hour of Mercury motion be
equivalent to 48 hours of the moon motion.
o (3rd
Point)
o (Equal Distances Create Different Rates Of Time) What does this rule
mean? it means the period of each distance is equal to the other period of
time – and that means- the moon (clock) moves 48 hours in during Mercury
(clock) moves 1 hour – both period are equal – the moon second period
=1/48 of Mercury second period
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
o That means, the person who lives on the moon will pass (48 hours) of his
life but the person on Mercury will pass only 1 hour of his life – both
periods are equal the definition of second period for each planet is different
from one to answer
o (4th
Point)
o The question is (How different rates of time be created without high velocity
motion?) because
o We have 2 Gears work interacted with Each other which are:
o The moon motion and Mercury motion
o These 2 planets motions are interacted through the motion (energy)
transportation –
o Why these 2 gears are required to be interacted in this motion?
o Because the moon daily displacement = 88000 km where it's necessary to
make this displacement equal (176000 km = 2 x 88000 km) – (in the moon
orbital motion description of the current paper we review why this distance
176000 km is required)
o So, The 2 Gears (Mercury and the moon uses the moon displacement 88000
km daily to produce the required distance 176000 km)
o So, the moon motion distance = 742 mkm and Mercury motion distance = 2
x 742 mkm – similar to that – the moon daily displacement be 88000 km
and be = 176000 km by The Interaction Between Mercury And The Moon
Motion –
o (Because of that, Mercury orbital period =88 days and its day period
=175.95 days, If this data is used through the rate 1000 km = 1 solar day,
these 2 values will be equal the 2 distances of the moon motion)
o (5th
Point)
o Where (23.96/23.9) = (361 degrees /360 degrees)
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
o Why we need this rate
o The very small error between (23.96 h and 23.9 h) is rated to the rate
(361/360) and what's this rate
o 360 degrees is the cycle degrees
o 361 degrees is the moon orbit regression degrees – because the moon orbit
regresses during a year (365.25 days) 19 degrees which causes change for
the eclipse calendar with 19 days– so during 19 years – the complete
revolution will be 361 degrees –
o Because of that many data is rated by this rate (361/360) and that means this
small error isn't an error but it's found for a geometrical necessity because
the revolution degrees is not 360 degrees but 361 degrees and that
necessitates geometrical modifications for different data
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
2-2 The Rate Of Time Between The Moon And Mars Motions
I- Data
(3)
24.1 (km/s) (Mars Velocity) x 29.53 hours = 2562074.856
(4)
The moon displacement total during 29.53 solar days = 2598693km
The difference between both = 1.4%
II- Discussion
- Equations no. (3 and 4) tell that
- Mars moves during 29.53 hours a distance equal (approximately) the moon
displacements total during 29.53 solar days
- From this data we conclude that
- 1 hour of Mars Motion be equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- We use the same rule (Equal Distances Create Different Rates Of Time)
- But
- There's error 1.4% between the 2 distances, that tells the rate (1 hour = 24 hours) is
correct but in the detailed discussion the accuracy needs to take into consideration
this error 1.4%
- The rule is still solid and correct and it's the rule which control the basic operations
in the solar system motions interaction
Notice
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion be equivalent to 48 hours of the moon motion
- And
- 1 hour of Mars Motion be equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- So
- 2 hours of Mars Motion must be equivalent to 1 hour of Mercury Motion, Is it
true? In point no. (2-4) we should answer this question
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
2-3 The Rate Of Time Between The Moon And Pluto Motions
I-Data
(5)
406000 km = 88000 km x 4.61
II-Discussion
Equation no. (5)
406000 km = 88000 km x 4.61 Where
406000 km = Pluto Motion per a solar day
88000 km = the moon displacement per A Solar Day
- Equation no. (5) tells that,
- 1 hour of Pluto motion = 4.61 hours of the moon motion
- Because of that
- The moon day period 708.7 hours = 4.61 x 153.3 h (Pluto day period)
- We still use the same rule (equal distances create different rates of time)
Notice no. (1)
- 48 hours of the moon motion = 1 hour of Mercury motion = 2 hours of Mars
motion, so what about Pluto?
- We have to use the rate 1 hour of Pluto = 4.61 hours of the moon and
- 1 hour of Mars be = 4.61 hours of Pluto
- 1 hour of Mercury be = 9.23 hours of Pluto
- These are the rates which we have to use! Why?
- In the next point (2-4) we should answer
Notice no. (2)
- 24 hours /4.61 = 5.2 hours
- The moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees) is created by an interaction of Pluto
motion on the moon motion
- This idea is supported by the fact that, Pluto moves during its day period a distance
= the moon displacements' total during 29.53 days
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
2-4 The General Rate Of Time Among These 4 Planets
I-Data
(6)
48 hours of the moon motion =1 hour of Mercury Motion = 2 hours of Mars
Motion = 9.23 hours of Pluto Motion
(7)
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during its rotation period (1407.6 hours) = 240.2 mkm
Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during Venus day period (2802 hours) = 243.1 mkm
(8)
9.23 x 153.3 hours = 1415 hours
Equation no. (7)
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during its rotation period (1407.6 hours) = 240.2 mkm
Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during Venus day period (2802 hours) = 243.1 mkm
- The difference between the distance 240.2 mkm and 243.1 mkm is around 1%
- Equation no. (7) tells that both distances are equal (approximately)
- Let's remember the rule (Equal distances creates different rates of time) means, the
periods of time are equal, so the mercury period (1407.6 hours) is equal Mars
period (2802 hours)
- By that 2 hours of Mars Motion is equivalent to 1 hour of Mercury Motion
- This same rate we have concluded from the moon motion (supposed) interaction
with these 2 planets – that means – we have 2 different data proves this same rate
of time which may shows that it's a fact
Notice
- Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) = approximately 2 x Mars velocity (24.1 km/s)
- Because of that Mercury and Mars motion rate to the moon motion distance equal
(2) and to their motions distance equal (2) also – means –the secret is the velocities
rate, because of that, the claim that it create a different rate of time (1h = 2 h) is not
strong claim!
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
- The first objection against this idea is that – the period 2802 hour = Venus day
period and that means this period is defined geometrically through the solar system
and not be limited to Mars and Mercury motion
- 1 hour of Pluto motion = 4.61 hours of the moon motion
- And
- We suppose this same rate should be used between Pluto and Mars motions (later
we discuss Why)
- Means
- 1 hour of Mars Motion = 4.61 hours of Pluto motion
- But
- (Mars Velocity 24.1 km/s) / (Pluto velocity 4.7 km /s) = 5.13
- But
- (24 hours/ 4.61) = 5.2
- That tells the interaction is not some numbers found by pure coincidences – it's
clearly directed data – The interaction is complex and found deeply between Mars
and Pluto and the moon which causes the rate 5.1 to be in different units (as a rate
between velocities, or rate of periods of time and also as the moon orbital
inclination 5.1 deg – it's strong geometrical machine which we don't know its rules
and we need to discover them)
- The rates of time between the planets motions is a geometrical tool based on which
the solar system is designed and created – it's a treasure we should analyze till
discover how this wonderful machine is created.
- Also
- (Pluto orbital distance 5906 mkm/ Mars orbital distance 227.9 mkm)1/2
= 5.1
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
- The second objection is that
- Because 1 hour of Mars motion = 4.61 hours of Pluto motion and
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 2 hours of Mars motion
- That means
- 1 hour of Mercury motion should be equal 9.23 hours of Pluto motion
- Now let's see the equation no. (8)
Equation no. (8)
9.23 x 153.3 hours = 1415 hours
- Where
- 153.3 hours = Pluto Rotation Period
- 1407.6 hours = Mercury Rotation Period (the error 0.5% with 1415)
- So, both 2 planets rotation periods depends on this same rate 9.23
- We have a reason to consider that, this data is created based on a geometrical
machine and that tells the different rates of time is almost a fact tool used in the
solar system geometry.
Notice
- But the rate 4.61 doesn't define Mars motion with Mercury motion
- Where
- 4.61 x 26.4 hours (Mars rotation period) = 113.4 hours
- And
- Mercury rotation period =1407.6 hours?
- So the rate 4.61 is a relationship between mars and Pluto motions but doesn't work
between Mars and Mercury motion
- It's not understandable why in some data the rates work and in another data the
rates don't work? how to understand that?
- To understand we need to study the relationship between planet velocity and its
rate of time – let's do that in following
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
2-5 Planet Velocity Effect On Its Rate Of Time
- Let's summarize the idea in following
o The solar system uses 1 second of motion to causes a motion for 1 solar day
o If this rate of time depends on the planets velocity –as we have discussed
before – the difference between the planet velocities should be so great – but
not – the greatest velocity is mercury (47.4 km/s) and the smallest is Pluto
(4.7 km/s) the rate between them is (47.4/4.7) = 10.08
o So the maximum rate the solar planets can do is that,
o 1 hour can be equivalent to 10.08 hours
o But the solar group machine has greater rates of time than this one
o How that is done?
o By Velocities Accumulation
o Let's use one example
o The 3 planets (Mercury + Venus + Earth) velocities total = 112.2 km/s
o Pluto velocity = 4.7 km/s
o The rate between them (112.2/4.7) = 24
o That's the way by which the solar system creates rates of time greater than
the planets velocities
o The basic difficulty is that, we don't know how the 3 plants velocities total
be used in comparison with Pluto - because
o We see each planet independent from the other planets we can't understand
the teamwork system because of this vision
o The 3 planets move on one side and Pluto moves on the other side by that
they create the rate 1 hour (of the 3 planets motions total) = 24 hours of
Pluto motion –
o This rate is used by Mars and the moon motions proportionality – that
means both the moon and Mars motions depends on the 4 planets motions –
but we still need to discover the mechanism behind
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
o For that reason
o Pluto moves during its day period a distance = earth motion distance
during its day period = the moon displacements total during its days
period.
o Because of that also
o Earth Velocity / Pluto velocity = (Pluto day period/ Earth day period)
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
3- The Moon Orbital Motion Description
3-1 Why Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
3-2 How Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion Analysis
3-4 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
3-1 Why Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
- Let's summarize this question answer in following:
o The moon uses Pythagorean triangle basically to decrease its displacement
daily through its orbit
o The moon daily displacement = 88000 km and the moon has to move this
distance every day without any decreasing (later we will know why!)
o But
o If the moon moves by this displacement as its orbital displacement the moon
would revolve around Earth through its apogee orbit only (r=0.406 mkm)
o For that reason
o The moon creates an angle between its motion direction and its orbit
horizontal level to create a displacement through its orbit less than (88000
km)
o As a result of this technique, the moon can revolve around Earth through
more near orbits than apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm)
o Simply, because the moon uses this technique the moon can revolve around
Earth through perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
o Let's explain this intelligent technique with some details to show the useful
result of using Pythagorean triangle by the moon orbital motion….
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
3-2 How Does The Moon Use Pythagorean Triangle In Its Motion?
- The moon moves daily (88000 km) on the right triangle hypotenuse (AC), but the
moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal
level, by that the real displacement through the moon orbit will be (L= 88000 km
cos (θ)), and by that, spite the moon moves 88000 km, but the real orbital
horizontal displacement be less than (88000 km) and this is the objective for which
the moon uses Pythagorean triangle –
As an example,
- If (θ) =28.63 degrees, the real displacement (L== 88000 km cos (θ)) = 77237 km,
So, if the moon real displacement daily be (77237 km), during 29.53 days the
moon will pass a distance = 2.28 million km and this will be the moon orbital
circumference, where 2.28 mkm = 2π x (0.363 mkm)
- The Moon Orbital Perigee Radius =0.363 mkm
- That means, the moon by a real displacement =77237 km can move around Earth
through the perigee orbit (radius =0.363 mkm), this is the useful result the moon
performs by using Pythagorean triangle,
- Now let's suppose the moon doesn't use Pythagorean triangle, what would happen?
- The moon daily displacement = 88000 km, during 29.53 days the moon moves a
distance = 2.598 mkm where 2.598 mkm = 2π x (0.413 mkm)
- The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius =0.406 mkm
- So the moon will move along month revolving around Earth through its apogee
orbit (or even far from apogee orbit) because the total distance can't be passed
through any more near orbit around Earth…
- The data shows how Pythagorean triangle is so useful for the moon orbital motion.
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
The Angle θ
- The angle (θ) should get our attention for its specific effect…let's summarize the
idea in following
o The angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L = 88000 cos (θ)), through the
moon orbit..
o We know that, when the real displacement (L) be shorter the moon can
move through near orbits to Earth and by that the moon can be near or at
Perigee radius (0.363 mkm)
o When the real displacement (L) be greater the moon has to move through
orbits far from Earth and by that the moon can be near or at apogee orbit
(r=0.406 mkm)
o That means, the angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L) and also
changes the distance between the moon to perigee or to apogee, shortly, the
angle (θ) defines the moon position (as a ship) between 2 river banks….
- The angle (θ) defines the moon orbital motion basic features and we have to
discuss is deeply with the moon orbital motion equation (θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees),
but before we need to analyze the moon orbital motion
Notice
o We know that (363000)2
+ (86000)2
= (373000)2
o In Pythagoras triangle with dimensions (363000 km, 373000km, 86000 km),
what's the angle (θ)? The angle (θ) = 13.33 degrees
o Also (396800)2
+ (86000)2
= (406000)2
the angle (θ) = 12.229 degrees
o I have used (363000 km and 406000 km) because they are the perigee and
apogee radiuses between which the moon moves.
o The difference between angles = 1.1 degrees
i.e.,
The angle (1.1 deg.) controls the moon motion from perigee to apogee, we will need
this notice later in our discussion
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
3-3 The Moon Orbital Motion
- The moon moves per a solar day a motion typical to the Earth motion to avoid the
separation from Earth through their motions, based on this rule, the moon moves
per a solar day 2.573 million km with an angle declines on the horizontal level
0.98562 degrees as typical to Earth motion
- If there's no Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon effect on the moon motion,
the moon motion trajectory would to be a parallel line to Earth Motion Trajectory,
But Lorentz Length Contraction effects on the moon motion daily distance (2.573
mkm) with a rate 1.0725 and causes this distance to be contracted (2.399 mkm)
- The moon difficulties are started here, because the difference between both
distances (0.17 mkm) will cause the moon to be separated from Earth motion
inevitably
- We should notice that, these motions are done far from our observation, means, we
see nothing of this motion distance, because the moon moves on the Earth orbital
circumference revolving around the sun, but, even if we can't observe this motion
distance the motion is still fact and proved by its power, because the Earth moves
per a solar day 2.573 mkm and if the moon doesn't move this same distance every
solar day that necessities the moon to be separated from the Earth through their
motions course – based on that- the facts prove this motion regardless our
observation ability for it.
- Now the moon has an additional distance to be passed (0.17 mkm) and the moon
has to pass this distance on the same solar day to avoid the separation from the
Earth during their motions.
- Because of that, the moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on
Earth gravity force (by which we see the moon in the Earth sky), but the different
distance (0.17 mkm) to be covered still needs the moon to move one more
displacement (= 88000 km)
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
- The previous explanation tells that, the moon has to move 2 displacements each =
88000 km, while we see one displacement only because it's done through the
moon orbital motion around Earth but the other displacement should be done also
because this total distance (0.17 mkm) is required to cover the different distance
and create the total (2.573 mkm) which saves the moon and Earth motions
accompanying.
- Now we have 2 basic information about the moon orbital motion
o (1st
information) the moon uses Pythagorean triangle in its orbital motion
o (2nd
information) the moon has to move 2 displacements each =88000 km
and their total distance =0.17 mkm which is a required distance necessary to
cover the difference between the moon and Earth motions distances.
- This explanation helps us to understand why the moon uses Pythagorean triangle
in its motion, because the moon can't decrease its daily displacement (88000 km)
because the moon needs this distance to cover the different distance between its
contracted motion distance (2.399 mkm) and Earth motion distance (2.573 mkm),
So the moon needs to move this displacement perfectly, but if it's used as a
displacement through the moon orbit, the moon would be always a prisoner in the
apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm) as we have discussed before, because of that, the
moon creates Pythagorean triangle technique by which the moon moves actually
88000 km daily but the real displacement through the moon orbit became less (L =
88000 Cos θ) and by that the moon can achieve 2 objectives, First to pass the
required distance (88000 km) and Second to move in near orbits to Earth, that
shows the intelligent moon motion technique…
- (Notice, Lorentz Length Contraction Effect Discussion is in Appendix No. 1)
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
The Moon Orbital Motion Needs One More Orbit
- The previous explanation tells that, the moon moves 2 displacements each =88000
km, we see one of these 2 displacements but where's the other displacement?!
- We know that, the moon original motion (2.573 mkm) which is contracted to be
(2.399 mkm) isn't seen by us because the moon moves this distance revolving with
Earth around the sun along the Earth Orbital Circumference
- We may accept that, the 2nd
displacement the moon does on this same trajectory
and isn't seen by us.
- So,
- There must be one more orbit for the moon to move through this 2nd
displacement.
means,
- There's 2nd
Orbit For The Moon Motion
- But
- How can we discover this second orbit if we can't observe the 2nd
displacement
motion?
- We can discover this 2nd
orbit by the moon orbit data analysis. So we should
depend on the moon orbital triangle data analysis to define this 2nd
orbit position.
- For that we have to discuss the moon 2nd
orbit in our deep analysis of The Moon
Orbital Triangle Geometrical Structure.
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
3-4 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
3-4-1 The Equation Concept
3-4-2 The Equation Test and Accuracy
3-4-1 The Equation Concept
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- The moon orbital motion equation is created depending on the concept we have
discussed, which is (the moon uses Pythagorean triangle in its orbital motion)
- The moon uses Pythagorean triangle and by this intelligent technique the moon be
under control of the angle (θ) change
- The angle (θ) defines almost all the moon motion features.…
- The moon uses this technique, aiming to create a real displacement shorter than its
actual displacement (88000 km) based on the equation (L =88000 cos (θ)) and by
that while the moon moves a displacement =88000 km but the real displacement
(L) through its orbit be shorter than 88000 km and by that the moon can revolve
around Earth through more near orbits than its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm).
- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this concept and, the equation
uses (the constant) 1.7 degrees as the moon daily motion degrees, and the equation
uses the previous day angle (θ0) to produce the today angle (θ1)
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- We have 3 questions in this equation study which are:
o How does this equation work?
o Is this equation trustee and correct?
o Why does the equation use the angle 1.7 degrees for the moon daily motion?
Let's try to answer….
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
How to use this equation?
- Perigee Radius =0.363 mkm, so Its Orbital Circumference =2.28 mkm
- Suppose the moon will revolve around Earth through perigee orbit only during
29.53 days, so
- (2.28 mkm /29.53 days) = 77237 km
- This is (the real displacement = L = 88000 km Cos θ = 77237 km),
- What's the angle θ value? the angle θ = 28.63 degrees
- Suppose the moon stand on this point yesterday with the angle (θ) =28.63 degrees,
where the moon will move today?
- From Perigee (the most near point to Earth) the moon will move in Ascending
motion because it moves from perigee (0.363 mkm) to apogee (0.406 mkm)
- In Ascending motion we use (-1.7 degrees) because the angle (θ) is decreased
where the real displacement (L) is increased, So let's do that in following
o (θ1= θ0 - 1.7 degrees)
o (θ1= 28.63 degrees - 1.7 degrees) = 26.93 degrees
o L = 88000 Cos (26.93 degrees) = 78454 km
o During 29.53 days so (78454 km x 29.53 days = 2.316 mkm)
o 2.316 mkm = 2π x 368722 km
That means
o The moon was (before motion) on Perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm) and starts
its motion displacement 88000 km. For day motion the equation uses 1.7
degrees, that means, the moon on perigee uses Pythagorean triangle with
angle (28.63 degrees) and during one solar day the moon uses - 1.7 degrees
and by that the angle will be (26.93 degrees)…... The angle 1.7 degrees
expresses The Moon Daily Motion
o By using Pythagorean triangle its angle (θ) = 26.93 deg, the displacement
(88000 km) will create a real displacement through the moon orbit = 78454
km and the moon will finish its motion today at a distance 368722 km
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
means the moon is far from perigee radius with (368722 km-363000 km
=5722 km )
o So, the moon after 1 day motion will be at the point 368722 km and will
have the Pythagorean triangle its angle 26.93 degrees.
The Descending Motion
o When the moon moves from apogee (0.406 mkm) to perigee (0.363 mkm),
so the angle (1.7 degrees) will be positive (+1.7 degrees) because the angle
(θ) is increased and the real displacement (L = 88000 Cos (θ)) be shorter.
So
o If the moon in apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm), what's the angle (θ)?
o The apogee orbital circumference = 0.406 mkm x2π =2.55 mkm = 29.53
days x 86400 km, the angle (θ) = 10.96 degrees (=11 deg approx.)
o The moon moves from apogee to perigee (descending motion)
o (θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees) means (θ1= 11 degrees + 1.7 degrees) = 12.7 deg.
o L = 88000 Cos (12.7 degrees) = 85847 km
o During 29.53 days so (85847 km x 29.53 days = 2.535 mkm)
o 2.535 mkm = 2π x 403467 km
So
o After one day the moon will be on 403467 km far from apogee (406000 km)
with 2540 km
Now let's see this equation test and efficiency in following
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
3-4-2 The Equation Test and Accuracy
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
- I have tested the Equation with real data for 2 months June 2020 and October 2020
- The results are very good and I provide the results here for better vision
concerning the equation efficiency
1st
Test June 2020
Day Registered Data The Results (1.7) Difference
6-6-2020 369418 km
7-6-2020 373729 km 374772.5 - 1044
8-6-2020 378917 km 378821.5 96
9-6-2020 384534 km 383667.7 867
10-6-2020 390096 km 388890 1206
11-6-2020 395156 km 394000 1156
12-6-2020 399345 km 398604.2 741
13-6-2020 402395 km 402361.3 34
14-6-2020 404153 km 405052.8 -900
15-6-2020 404574 km ---- ---
16-6-2020 403718 km 401848.5 1870
17-6-2020 401733 km 400876.1 857
18-6-2020 398840 km 398640.7 200
19-6-2020 395303 km 395417.4 115
20-6-2020 391409 km 391521.2 -113
21-6-2020 387432 km 387273.4 159
22-6-2020 383607 km 382968.4 639
23-6-2020 380110 km 378852 1258
24-6-2020 377044 km 375107 1937
25-6-2020 374451 km 371836.5 2615
26-6-2020 372338 km 369077 3262
27-6-2020 370703 km 366855.6 3847
[
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
The 1st
Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 20 Values
(1st
Category)
o 15 values, defines the moon position in range 1300 km (Error 3%)
(2nd
Category)
o 2 values, defines the moon position in range 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
(3rd
Category)
o 3 values, defines the moon position in range 2000-3500 km (Error 8 %)
- The Results Explanation
- The distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km…
o 1st
Category of results defines the moon position in error range (1300 km) =
error (3%), that means, (15 values of 20) defines the moon position with
error (3%) only (Small Error Range)
o 2nd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (1300
km to 2000 km) = error (4.5%), that means (2 values of 20) defines the
moon position with error (4.5%) (Average Error Range)
o 3rd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (2000
km to 3500 km) = error (8%), that means (3 values of 20) defines the moon
position with error (8%) (Great Error Range)
- The Equation Accuracy
o The previous explanation shows that, the equation has a good range of
accuracy and its error is in the acceptable error range
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
And
It's a useful tool to define the moon position daily
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
2nd
Test October 2020
Day Registered Data Results (1.7) Difference
5-10-2020 405,690 km --- ---
6-10-2020 404,171 km 403125.3 km 1046 km
7-10-2020 401,649 km 401390 km 259 km
8-10-2020 398,073 km 398545.6 Km - 473 km
9-10-2020 393,464 km 394568.8 km -1105 km
10-10-2020 387,944 km 389510 km -1567 km
11-10-2020 381,763 km 383520 km -1758 km
12-10-2020 375,302 km 376875.3km -1574 km
13-10-2020 369,063 km 369981km -919 km
14-10-2020 363,617 km 363363.4km 254 km
15-10-2020 359,530 km 357612 km 1918 km
16-10-2020 357,269 km 353307 km 3962 km
17-10-2020 357,105 km ---- --
18-10-2020 359,048 km --- --
19-10-2020 362,851 km 364979.7 km - 2129 km
20-10-2020 368,058 km 368579.3 km -522 km
21-10-2020 374,101 km 373492.4 km 609 km
22-10-2020 380,412 km 379168.3 Km 1244 Km
23-10-2020 386,497 km 385059.3Km 1438 km
24-10-2020 391,989 km 390694.3 km 1295 km
25-10-2020 396,659 km 395729.5 km 930 km
26-10-2020 400,395 km 399958.7 km 437 km
27-10-2020 403,181 km 403299 km 112 km
28-10-2020 405,059 km 405738.5 km -680 km
29-10-2020 406,104 km 407359.4 km -1256 km
[
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
28
The Test Results Analysis:
- The Total Results Are 22 Values
(1st
Category)
o 15 values, defines the moon position in range 1300 km (Error 3%)
(2nd
Category)
o 5 values, defines the moon position in range 1300-2000 km (Error 4.6 %)
(3rd
Category)
o 2 values, defines the moon position in range 2000-3500 km (Error 8 %)
- The Results Explanation
- The distance from perigee to apogee =43000 km…
o 1st
Category of results defines the moon position in error range (1300 km) =
error (3%), that means, (15 values of 22) defines the moon position with
error (3%) only (Small Error Range)
o 2nd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (1300
km to 2000 km) = error (4.5%), that means (5 values of 22) defines the
moon position with error (4.5%) (Average Error Range)
o 3rd
Category of results defines the moon position in error range from (2000
km to 3500 km) = error (8%), that means (2 values of 22) defines the moon
position with error (8%) (Great Error Range)
- The Equation Accuracy
o The previous explanation shows that, the equation has a good range of
accuracy and its error is in the acceptable error range
The Conclusion
The Equation Is correct and trustee
And
It's a useful tool to define the moon position daily
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
29
3-4-3 The Value 1.7 degrees
- The 3rd
question was, why the equation uses 1.7 degrees?
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees)
Because
1.7 degrees = 0.98562 degrees + 0.712 degrees
Where
- 0.98562 degrees = Earth motion daily degrees, and it equals the moon daily
motion degrees because the moon has to move an equal distance to Earth motion
daily distance to save their motions accompanying
- This question and the angle 0.712 degrees is discussed deeply before.
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
30
The Moon Motion Difficulties
- There are 2 basic difficulties are observed in the moon orbital motions, let's refer
to them in following:
o (1st
Difficulty) The moon moves per day different distances from perigee to
apogee…..
o We know the moon moves from perigee to apogee (go and back) during
Anomalistic month (27.55 solar days)
o (43000 km x 2) / 27.55 days = 3122 km
o The moon doesn't use this rate (3122 km) in its motion, instead the moon
can move (6000 km) on one day only and on another day may move only
2500 km (or even less)!
o The moon orbital equation tries to solve this difficulty by using the rate 1.7
degrees in the equation (θ1 = θ0 + 1.7 degrees), the value 1.7 degrees is a
great number and enables the moon to move around (5000 km) per solar day
and by that if the moon moves per solar day 4000 km the different distance
will be 1000 km and if the moon moves 6000 km the different will be
– 1000 km, it’s the same difference, and by that, the error be minimized as
possible enabling the equation to be more efficient..
o (2nd
Difficulty) The moon stays in perigee and apogee points long time….
o That means, while the moon be on perigee or apogee, the moon doesn't use
the equation and doesn't change its distance to perigee or apogee for long
days…we may notice that in the equation tests, when the moon reach to
perigee or apogee the equation stops its work and stays 2 or 3 days to return
to its work… because the moon consumes long time to leave the points
(perigee and apogee)…
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
31
References
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (II)
https://www.academia.edu/45181646/The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbital-motion-geometry-ii
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous