Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
•
0 likes•60 views
Paper Claim Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time - This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following 1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion 2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion) 3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day) 4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis 5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Orbital Period Definition
Paper Hypothesis
- Planet Orbital Period, Rotation Period And Day Period (Planet Cycles Periods), Are Defined Depending On Each Other And On Other Planets Cycles Periods.
- 1 Hour On Mercury = 1 Solar Day On Earth (Venus Also uses This Rate Of Time)
- The Solar Group Is One Machine Works As A Mechanical Clock- Transports The Motion From Planet To Another With Different Rates Of Time, Aiming To Enable Light Motion During 1 Second Period To Cause A Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Abstract
Earth Moon regresses yearly 19 degrees which means 1.44 degrees per month (Lunar nodes are moving west by about 19° per year)
Paper Hypotheses
1. Moon Orbit Regression proves that "Energy is Transported from Point to another through the solar system"
2. Moon Orbit Regression Energy is transported from Pluto to Uranus to Mercury to Earth Moon Orbit
3. Moon Orbit Regression is A Solar Group General Motion.
i.e.
- Solar Group is one building and each planet is a part of it. or Solar Group is one machine and each planet is a gear of it.
- Based on that – Solar Planet Motion is not individual or independent motion – on the contrary – all solar planets move together as a train moves with all its carriages
(although solar planets move by different velocities from each other – but they together consist one general motion)
The paper tries to prove these facts
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Mercury Rotation Period Creation
- 142984 km = 13.1 km/sec (Jupiter velocity) x10921 seconds, this equation tells that, Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km (= Jupiter diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, the Earth moon needs to rotate 13.1 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 142984 km (the Earth moon circumference 10921 km) (The moon needs 27.3 days to rotate around its axis and by that the 13.1 rotations needs 13.1 x 27.3 = 358 days = 1 year)
- 51118 km = 6.8 km/sec (Uranus velocity)x 7511 seconds, this equation tells that, Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km (=Uranus diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, Pluto needs to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 51118 km (Pluto circumference 7511 km) (Pluto 153.3 hours to rotate around its axis and by that the 6.8 rotations needs 6.8 x 153.3 = 1042.5 hours)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and mars motions interaction
Abstract
Why does Earth rotate 4-years Cycle?
Because there's an interaction and coherence between Earth, Moon and Mars Motions, this interaction causes this 4-years Cycle
This paper tries to prove this fact, and explains its mechanism.
Also we discuss here the "Distance" and "Time" Definitions, explaining how to distinguish between the matter and space.
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference =Earth Motion distance during 1solar day?
- This question was the first one I have faced in the moon orbital motion- may try to solve it in following….
- Planet motion depends on light motion based on the hypothesis (1 second of light motion causes Planet motion for 1 solar day), this hypothesis creates the 1st rate of time in the solar system which is (1 second of light = 1 day of planet)
- The 1st rate of time dominates any planet motion – but – in the Earth Moon Orbit, this rate is changed by Venus & Mars Motions Effect
- (86400 = 237 x 365), where 237 = (Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period) and 365 =(Earth orbital circumference /the moon orbital circumference)
- Venus & Mars Motions Interaction cause to remove the rate (237) from the previous equation- and because of that (1 day on the sun = 365 days on Earth) and that causes the moon orbital circumference = Earth motion distance daily
But
- The moon circumference shows also this same rate, as we have concluded that from (10921 km the moon circumference x 86400 seconds = 940 mk) This equation tells that, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one Solar Day Only, so the moon circumference in this case will equal the Earth motion distance during 1 second…means the rate (1 is equivalent to 365) is seen again in the moon circumference as we have seen it in the moon orbit..!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Recommended
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Orbital Period Definition
Paper Hypothesis
- Planet Orbital Period, Rotation Period And Day Period (Planet Cycles Periods), Are Defined Depending On Each Other And On Other Planets Cycles Periods.
- 1 Hour On Mercury = 1 Solar Day On Earth (Venus Also uses This Rate Of Time)
- The Solar Group Is One Machine Works As A Mechanical Clock- Transports The Motion From Planet To Another With Different Rates Of Time, Aiming To Enable Light Motion During 1 Second Period To Cause A Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Abstract
Earth Moon regresses yearly 19 degrees which means 1.44 degrees per month (Lunar nodes are moving west by about 19° per year)
Paper Hypotheses
1. Moon Orbit Regression proves that "Energy is Transported from Point to another through the solar system"
2. Moon Orbit Regression Energy is transported from Pluto to Uranus to Mercury to Earth Moon Orbit
3. Moon Orbit Regression is A Solar Group General Motion.
i.e.
- Solar Group is one building and each planet is a part of it. or Solar Group is one machine and each planet is a gear of it.
- Based on that – Solar Planet Motion is not individual or independent motion – on the contrary – all solar planets move together as a train moves with all its carriages
(although solar planets move by different velocities from each other – but they together consist one general motion)
The paper tries to prove these facts
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
Earth Motion Energy produces the Moon Orbit based on The relativistic Motion
Example for Explanation:
In Lorentz Length contraction Equation
If
- Lo = Earth Daily Motion = 2.58 million
- v= 0.99 c (Earth hidden velocity- Hypothesis)
- L = 363000 km (the distance between Earth and moon at Perigee Point)
- Lo= 7.09 L
That means
Earth Energy Motion moves toward the moon and builds the moon orbit by this Energy
(that proves Earth has a hidden velocity =0.99c)
The Basic Concept
The Solar Group is consisted of one unified Energy, which passes and transports from point to another through the solar group
This unified Energy creates the solar planets matters, orbital distances and motions
Means the whole group is connected together by the same line of Energy, that's why we should consider the solar group as one body
So if the moon orbit is built by Earth motion energy (as we'll study in this paper)
That will be an example for the whole solar group,
the solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, each canal effects on the others
also
the solar group can be similar to group of gears, each gear effects on the others motions,
In Brief
I claim, The Solar groups is an integrated and cooperated system
The components of this system are created by an unified Energy, where this same unified Energy is transported from point to another through the solar group to cause the creation and motion of all these components and no solar component is found out of this Energy
(Solar components means the solar planets masses, orbital distances …and all other data)
Mercury Rotation Period Creation
- 142984 km = 13.1 km/sec (Jupiter velocity) x10921 seconds, this equation tells that, Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km (= Jupiter diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, the Earth moon needs to rotate 13.1 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 142984 km (the Earth moon circumference 10921 km) (The moon needs 27.3 days to rotate around its axis and by that the 13.1 rotations needs 13.1 x 27.3 = 358 days = 1 year)
- 51118 km = 6.8 km/sec (Uranus velocity)x 7511 seconds, this equation tells that, Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km (=Uranus diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, Pluto needs to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 51118 km (Pluto circumference 7511 km) (Pluto 153.3 hours to rotate around its axis and by that the 6.8 rotations needs 6.8 x 153.3 = 1042.5 hours)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and mars motions interaction
Abstract
Why does Earth rotate 4-years Cycle?
Because there's an interaction and coherence between Earth, Moon and Mars Motions, this interaction causes this 4-years Cycle
This paper tries to prove this fact, and explains its mechanism.
Also we discuss here the "Distance" and "Time" Definitions, explaining how to distinguish between the matter and space.
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference =Earth Motion distance during 1solar day?
- This question was the first one I have faced in the moon orbital motion- may try to solve it in following….
- Planet motion depends on light motion based on the hypothesis (1 second of light motion causes Planet motion for 1 solar day), this hypothesis creates the 1st rate of time in the solar system which is (1 second of light = 1 day of planet)
- The 1st rate of time dominates any planet motion – but – in the Earth Moon Orbit, this rate is changed by Venus & Mars Motions Effect
- (86400 = 237 x 365), where 237 = (Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period) and 365 =(Earth orbital circumference /the moon orbital circumference)
- Venus & Mars Motions Interaction cause to remove the rate (237) from the previous equation- and because of that (1 day on the sun = 365 days on Earth) and that causes the moon orbital circumference = Earth motion distance daily
But
- The moon circumference shows also this same rate, as we have concluded that from (10921 km the moon circumference x 86400 seconds = 940 mk) This equation tells that, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one Solar Day Only, so the moon circumference in this case will equal the Earth motion distance during 1 second…means the rate (1 is equivalent to 365) is seen again in the moon circumference as we have seen it in the moon orbit..!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Another Force Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)
Paper Question
-Can the moon orbit regress and the Earth still in its same point in the space If the Earth moon distances after the regression still equal their values before it?
- The paper question tells us that….
- The moon orbit regression is done because of the moon vertical motion and both are done in consistency with a displacement done by Earth vertically for 1 km per solar day…
- I claim that, there are 3 motions done, but only one motion is seen, we have to conclude the 2 rest hidden motions….
o The seen motion is The Moon Orbit Regression
o The 1st hidden motion is the moon vertical motion…that means, the moon in its revolution around The Earth does a vertical motion, and this vertical motion is the reason of the Metonic Cycle (19 sidereal years)
o The 2nd hidden motion is the Earth motion, where the Earth moves daily a vertical displacement = 1 km
- These 3 motions are done in consistency with each other, and depends on each other (this dependency can be seen in a deep analysis for these 3 motions origin)
Paper Objective
- The paper tries to prove the moon vertical motion by using the moon motion data analysis, after this proof , The paper discusses if a vertical displacement of Earth is a necessary requirement for the moon orbit regression, which is done as a result of the moon vertical motion.
Paper 2nd Question
- Why it's necessary to know if the moon has a vertical motion?
- (1st) The moon motion has pauses can't be explained, as we have seen in our tests for (Gerges Equation for the moon orbital motion)… where the moon moves on a solar day a distance = 4000 km (in average) (for example from 384000 km to 388000 km) but we have found that, the moon in perigee & apogee top points stay for many days without change its orbit (for example during 28th, 29th and 30th January 2020, the moon stayed on (404425 km, 405333km, 405111 km)) – how to explain that?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Unit Definition Is Relative
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
that means
Value as – one kilometer - one hour - one degree or one liter…etc- all such values and units are defined based on the observer position and situation
That means
What we see as a time value can work in another place as a distance value
And
What we see as a degree value can work in another place as a distance value
2- The Energy Different Types Depend On This Same Concept.
Why Energy has different types? The energy gives energy whatever its form (oil- wood- electricity – magnetism – nuclear….etc)
The result of all these forms are similar approximately – so why there are different types for the energy?
Because of the observer position and situation
This paper tries to discuss and prove this fact
Uranus Effect On Mercury Motion
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
The Hypothesis Explanation
The different rates of time is the basic method, used by the solar system geometry to produce the sun rays – to see this hypothesis depth we need to review the sun rays creation process, let's do that in following:
- The sun rays energy isn't created by any nuclear interactions.
- The sun rays energy is produced by the solar planets motions energies concentration.
- The planets motions energies total are concentrated on one point (the sun point) and because the sun rate of time is different from Earth (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – because of that- the energy which is produced during a complete year can be used in one day only and by that the mechanical waves energies can be transferred into light waves energies and produce the sun rays.
- That tells us, the sun rays energy source is the planets motions energies
But
- The main cornerstone in this theory is, the different rates of time….
Because of that
- We need to prove, There Are Different Rates Of Time In The Solar System
- This paper tries to prove this hypothesis…
Paper Contents
(1) Introduction
(2) The Different Rates Of Time Using In The Solar System Motion
(3) Venus effect to produce different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar group general description
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Uranus effect on the moon orbit causes the period of 1 hour (of a planet motion) to be equivalent to 1 solar day (of another planet motion)
- We still analyze the interesting data (the moon circumference =10921 km)
o Pluto moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter
o Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter
o But
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 6.8 km/sc x 7511 seconds, the equation tells that, Uranus has to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = Uranus diameter (where 7511 km = Pluto circumference) – On The Other Side- Pluto has to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass (by rotation) 7511 km x6.8 = 51118 km (a distance = Uranus diameter)
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sc x 10921 seconds, Jupiter moves 10921 seconds for its diameter and On The Other Side the moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to pass a distance = Jupiter diameter
Paper question
o What geometrical mechanism behind this data?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
The solar day production
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Basic Questions (I)
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Solar group geometrical structure
Abstract
- Human mind works by light velocity, that's why we see the light around us as matter, because there's no difference in velocity between our minds operation speed and light velocity
- That necessitates Earth to move with light velocity relative to the sun to create the sun light beams.
- That's why the solar group has more than one frame
- The distance is an energy, that's proved by Moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees (otherwise how the distance can be moved?)
- The matter is bright fringes and distance is dark fringes both are produced by the same light coherence.
- Light Velocity creates Lorentz contraction phenomenon for many distances (with the same rate 7.25%) which can be a crucial proof for the claim
introduction
This paper discusses the solar group geometrical structure, and provides a clear claim as following:
- The Solar group is created by an energy; which is transported through the group from point to another,
- This transported energy through the solar group, creates Solar Planets matters, orbital distances and other data
- The solar planets data are produced by this transported energy to give the chance for this transported energy to pass through
So
- The solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, at end of each canal the water creates a soil from its clay (energy), so all these canals are related to each other, effect on each other and also their different soils are related to each other, to the different canals and to the main river.
- The Previous idea gives us a general vision for the solar group whole structure,
- The main point is related to the energy
- As the river water is transported through the canals and create the canals forms and motions
- Very similar to that, the Energy is transported through the solar group creating the planets matters and suitable motions in harmony providing the chance for the energy to pass
This paper is divided into 2 parts as following:
Part One
• Point No.3 –Theory of Matter Creation
Part Two
The solar Group Creation as an application on "Matter Creation Theory"
• Introduction
• Point No.4 Jupiter Energy
• Point No.5 The Coherence Event
• Point No.6 Angle θ and Mars Data
• Point No.7 Solar Planets Motions Description
• Point No.8 Solar Masses Distribution
• Point No.9 Jupiter and inner planets relationships
• Point No. 10 Jupiter Origin Energy
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
The Moon Orbital Inclination (Part II)
Paper Question
- The moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2.5986 mkm
- The moon apogee circumference =2.550973 mkm
- The difference 47720 km
- Because the apogee orbit (r= 406000 km) is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, the question is raised that (why the moon apogee orbital circumference doesn't equal its displacements total during 29.53 days?)
- The provided answer told that, because of the moon orbital inclination effect, this answer contains a reference that the moon orbital inclination 5.1 deg is created by an effect of Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction (II)
Paper Questions
- The previous paper (Earth and Moon Motions Interaction) left us with 3 questions which are:
- (1st Question) If the Earth moon moves daily 2.58 mkm why we don't see it?
- (2nd Question) If the moon motion distance (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be (2.41 mkm), and the moon has to move 2.58 mkm to save its motion companying with Earth, how the moon creates the different distance (0.17 mkm) …..
o This question answered told us that, Venus Day Period (116.7 days) effects on the moon motion to causes the moon daily displacement 88000 km to be = (2 x 88000 km =0.17 mkm)
o But no geometrical mechanism is suggested to explain how Venus day does this task…
- (3rd Question) – Is Metonic Cycle a vertical motion?
Also
- Many points were necessary to be discussed in the previous paper, but I couldn't because we have stopped with the 2nd question (by what geometrical mechanism does Venus Day Period effect on the moon daily displacement 88000 km to make it equal 170000 km?)
- So let's discuss this question immediately…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Particle double nature reason
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Is There A Parallel Universe (III)
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 3)
The Sun Creation process depends on
(1) Jupiter Energy
(2) Earth Motion
(3) Change Rate Of Time
(4) Earth Moon Orbit
(5) Mars Effect
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
Paper Question
How to use the different rates of time ( if found) in the solar system motion?
The previous paper suggested that, 2 different basic rates of time are found in the solar system which are ( 1s is equivalent to 86400 s) and (1 s equivalent to 365.25 s)
To produce these 2 rates of time, we have discovered of different rates of time are used between the planets relative to each other – for example (Earth day =29.53 days on the moon) and (Earth day = 153.3 hours on Pluto)
So, that discussion left us with some Chaos in time rate definition – where we simply don't what rate of time is used by any planet and why!
So the current paper provides one basic question – trying to know how to use all these rates of time – regardless how these are created –
But
The question in fact has one more deep aim, let's try to explain that in following:
- The basic rule by which I have defined the different rates of time is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) – based on this rule – Earth moves per its day a distance = moon motion distance during 29.53 days and because of that I have supposed that Earth day = 29.53 days on the moon – Also this same distance = Pluto motion distance during its day (153.3 hours), so 1 day of Earth = 153.3 hours of Pluto!
- This is the way by which I have defined the different rates of time for light and planet motion – it's one clear rule -
But
- Is this rule a correct one?! how to understand this question?! Let's give it some consideration in following……
- The solar system is a clock as I claimed, where I suppose that, light motion for 1 second causes planet to move 1 solar day, how that is occurred?!
- By planets different rates of time, i.e. 1 second of a planet is equivalent to 1 minute to another planet, then 1 minute of this planet is equivalent to 1 hour of a third planet, then 1 hour of it is equivalent to 1 day of fourth planet, and then equivalent to one month or one year…..etc
- i.e. the different rates of time are not found by some random machine to define any rate to any planet- instead – it defined specific rate for specific planet to create specific task – that's the aim of the different rates of time creation – it's a machine of time (A Clock)
-So, we should test our conclusions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect (II)
Paper Claim
Venus & Mars Motions Causes To Create The Moon Orbit Regression
- In the paper No. (part I) of this series, I have claimed that, Mars & Venus Motion interactive effect causes the Earth Moon orbit to regress creating a new rate of time….
i.e.
- (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day), this rate is found in the solar system out of the Earth moon orbit
- In the moon orbit the rate is (1 day of the sun = 1 year of Earth), this difference in rates is found by Venus & Mars motion effect on the moon orbit
But
- With what mechanism Venus and Mars do this effect? The data in the previous paper supports this claim strongly but no geometrical mechanism was explained in it – we have to do that in this paper
- As we know, the 1st rate of time is (1 to 86400) and the 2nd one is (1 to 365.25). so what Venus and Mars do, is to create the rate 237 which will cause the value 86400 to be equal 365.25, (237 = Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period)
- The question which this paper tries to answer is (How Venus and Mars daily motion can produce this rate 237?, shortly by what mechanism this rate is produced?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
More Related Content
What's hot
Another Force Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)
Paper Question
-Can the moon orbit regress and the Earth still in its same point in the space If the Earth moon distances after the regression still equal their values before it?
- The paper question tells us that….
- The moon orbit regression is done because of the moon vertical motion and both are done in consistency with a displacement done by Earth vertically for 1 km per solar day…
- I claim that, there are 3 motions done, but only one motion is seen, we have to conclude the 2 rest hidden motions….
o The seen motion is The Moon Orbit Regression
o The 1st hidden motion is the moon vertical motion…that means, the moon in its revolution around The Earth does a vertical motion, and this vertical motion is the reason of the Metonic Cycle (19 sidereal years)
o The 2nd hidden motion is the Earth motion, where the Earth moves daily a vertical displacement = 1 km
- These 3 motions are done in consistency with each other, and depends on each other (this dependency can be seen in a deep analysis for these 3 motions origin)
Paper Objective
- The paper tries to prove the moon vertical motion by using the moon motion data analysis, after this proof , The paper discusses if a vertical displacement of Earth is a necessary requirement for the moon orbit regression, which is done as a result of the moon vertical motion.
Paper 2nd Question
- Why it's necessary to know if the moon has a vertical motion?
- (1st) The moon motion has pauses can't be explained, as we have seen in our tests for (Gerges Equation for the moon orbital motion)… where the moon moves on a solar day a distance = 4000 km (in average) (for example from 384000 km to 388000 km) but we have found that, the moon in perigee & apogee top points stay for many days without change its orbit (for example during 28th, 29th and 30th January 2020, the moon stayed on (404425 km, 405333km, 405111 km)) – how to explain that?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Unit Definition Is Relative
1- The Unit Definition Is Relative
that means
Value as – one kilometer - one hour - one degree or one liter…etc- all such values and units are defined based on the observer position and situation
That means
What we see as a time value can work in another place as a distance value
And
What we see as a degree value can work in another place as a distance value
2- The Energy Different Types Depend On This Same Concept.
Why Energy has different types? The energy gives energy whatever its form (oil- wood- electricity – magnetism – nuclear….etc)
The result of all these forms are similar approximately – so why there are different types for the energy?
Because of the observer position and situation
This paper tries to discuss and prove this fact
Uranus Effect On Mercury Motion
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth
We still try to prove this same hypothesis we have suggested in the previous paper
Let's explain the proving process as simple as possible:
- I suppose there are 2 different rates of time in the solar system motion – Where (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – how to prove this hypothesis??
- We have 2 method to do that:
- (1st Method) to use Lorentz Transformation by creating Time dilation which enable different rates of time to be produced – but at first we need to prove that there are relativistic effects in the solar system and to define the high velocity motion which causes these relativistic effects – and I have proved that, there are relativistic effects in the solar system in my previous papers
- (2nd Method) to use the solar system geometrical necessities – let's explain this idea as possible in following:
o If there are 2 rates of time in the solar system as I claim, and if the solar system is one machine or one building as I suppose that means this one building has 2 rates of time
o That will necessitate to create the planets data in proportionality with both rates of time otherwise the machine can't work
o This is similar to use 2 different size gears in one machine, to do that, we have to uses some other gears their dimensions be in proportionality with BOTH gears otherwise the machine will not work…
o This is the idea I try to use, suggesting that, if there are different rates of time in the solar system, that necessities the planets data to be created in Proportionality with Both Rates of time – and because of that we can conclude there both rates of time by these planets data analysis
o This paper tries to prove that, the planets data are created by their values because (1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
Paper hypothesis
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
The Hypothesis Explanation
The different rates of time is the basic method, used by the solar system geometry to produce the sun rays – to see this hypothesis depth we need to review the sun rays creation process, let's do that in following:
- The sun rays energy isn't created by any nuclear interactions.
- The sun rays energy is produced by the solar planets motions energies concentration.
- The planets motions energies total are concentrated on one point (the sun point) and because the sun rate of time is different from Earth (1 day on the sun = 1 year on Earth) – because of that- the energy which is produced during a complete year can be used in one day only and by that the mechanical waves energies can be transferred into light waves energies and produce the sun rays.
- That tells us, the sun rays energy source is the planets motions energies
But
- The main cornerstone in this theory is, the different rates of time….
Because of that
- We need to prove, There Are Different Rates Of Time In The Solar System
- This paper tries to prove this hypothesis…
Paper Contents
(1) Introduction
(2) The Different Rates Of Time Using In The Solar System Motion
(3) Venus effect to produce different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar group general description
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Uranus effect on the moon orbit causes the period of 1 hour (of a planet motion) to be equivalent to 1 solar day (of another planet motion)
- We still analyze the interesting data (the moon circumference =10921 km)
o Pluto moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter
o Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter
o But
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 6.8 km/sc x 7511 seconds, the equation tells that, Uranus has to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = Uranus diameter (where 7511 km = Pluto circumference) – On The Other Side- Pluto has to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass (by rotation) 7511 km x6.8 = 51118 km (a distance = Uranus diameter)
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sc x 10921 seconds, Jupiter moves 10921 seconds for its diameter and On The Other Side the moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to pass a distance = Jupiter diameter
Paper question
o What geometrical mechanism behind this data?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
The solar day production
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Basic Questions (I)
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
Solar group geometrical structure
Abstract
- Human mind works by light velocity, that's why we see the light around us as matter, because there's no difference in velocity between our minds operation speed and light velocity
- That necessitates Earth to move with light velocity relative to the sun to create the sun light beams.
- That's why the solar group has more than one frame
- The distance is an energy, that's proved by Moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees (otherwise how the distance can be moved?)
- The matter is bright fringes and distance is dark fringes both are produced by the same light coherence.
- Light Velocity creates Lorentz contraction phenomenon for many distances (with the same rate 7.25%) which can be a crucial proof for the claim
introduction
This paper discusses the solar group geometrical structure, and provides a clear claim as following:
- The Solar group is created by an energy; which is transported through the group from point to another,
- This transported energy through the solar group, creates Solar Planets matters, orbital distances and other data
- The solar planets data are produced by this transported energy to give the chance for this transported energy to pass through
So
- The solar group can be similar to a river has many canals, at end of each canal the water creates a soil from its clay (energy), so all these canals are related to each other, effect on each other and also their different soils are related to each other, to the different canals and to the main river.
- The Previous idea gives us a general vision for the solar group whole structure,
- The main point is related to the energy
- As the river water is transported through the canals and create the canals forms and motions
- Very similar to that, the Energy is transported through the solar group creating the planets matters and suitable motions in harmony providing the chance for the energy to pass
This paper is divided into 2 parts as following:
Part One
• Point No.3 –Theory of Matter Creation
Part Two
The solar Group Creation as an application on "Matter Creation Theory"
• Introduction
• Point No.4 Jupiter Energy
• Point No.5 The Coherence Event
• Point No.6 Angle θ and Mars Data
• Point No.7 Solar Planets Motions Description
• Point No.8 Solar Masses Distribution
• Point No.9 Jupiter and inner planets relationships
• Point No. 10 Jupiter Origin Energy
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
The Moon Orbital Inclination (Part II)
Paper Question
- The moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2.5986 mkm
- The moon apogee circumference =2.550973 mkm
- The difference 47720 km
- Because the apogee orbit (r= 406000 km) is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, the question is raised that (why the moon apogee orbital circumference doesn't equal its displacements total during 29.53 days?)
- The provided answer told that, because of the moon orbital inclination effect, this answer contains a reference that the moon orbital inclination 5.1 deg is created by an effect of Pluto orbital inclination 17.2 deg…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and Moon Motions Interaction (II)
Paper Questions
- The previous paper (Earth and Moon Motions Interaction) left us with 3 questions which are:
- (1st Question) If the Earth moon moves daily 2.58 mkm why we don't see it?
- (2nd Question) If the moon motion distance (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be (2.41 mkm), and the moon has to move 2.58 mkm to save its motion companying with Earth, how the moon creates the different distance (0.17 mkm) …..
o This question answered told us that, Venus Day Period (116.7 days) effects on the moon motion to causes the moon daily displacement 88000 km to be = (2 x 88000 km =0.17 mkm)
o But no geometrical mechanism is suggested to explain how Venus day does this task…
- (3rd Question) – Is Metonic Cycle a vertical motion?
Also
- Many points were necessary to be discussed in the previous paper, but I couldn't because we have stopped with the 2nd question (by what geometrical mechanism does Venus Day Period effect on the moon daily displacement 88000 km to make it equal 170000 km?)
- So let's discuss this question immediately…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Particle double nature reason
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Is There A Parallel Universe (III)
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 3)
The Sun Creation process depends on
(1) Jupiter Energy
(2) Earth Motion
(3) Change Rate Of Time
(4) Earth Moon Orbit
(5) Mars Effect
What's hot (20)
Another Force Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)
Another Force Effects On The Earth Moon Motion (III)
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time) (II)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
1 Day On The Sun = 1 Year On Earth (Different Rates Of Time)
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 3)
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 3)
Similar to Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
Paper Question
How to use the different rates of time ( if found) in the solar system motion?
The previous paper suggested that, 2 different basic rates of time are found in the solar system which are ( 1s is equivalent to 86400 s) and (1 s equivalent to 365.25 s)
To produce these 2 rates of time, we have discovered of different rates of time are used between the planets relative to each other – for example (Earth day =29.53 days on the moon) and (Earth day = 153.3 hours on Pluto)
So, that discussion left us with some Chaos in time rate definition – where we simply don't what rate of time is used by any planet and why!
So the current paper provides one basic question – trying to know how to use all these rates of time – regardless how these are created –
But
The question in fact has one more deep aim, let's try to explain that in following:
- The basic rule by which I have defined the different rates of time is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) – based on this rule – Earth moves per its day a distance = moon motion distance during 29.53 days and because of that I have supposed that Earth day = 29.53 days on the moon – Also this same distance = Pluto motion distance during its day (153.3 hours), so 1 day of Earth = 153.3 hours of Pluto!
- This is the way by which I have defined the different rates of time for light and planet motion – it's one clear rule -
But
- Is this rule a correct one?! how to understand this question?! Let's give it some consideration in following……
- The solar system is a clock as I claimed, where I suppose that, light motion for 1 second causes planet to move 1 solar day, how that is occurred?!
- By planets different rates of time, i.e. 1 second of a planet is equivalent to 1 minute to another planet, then 1 minute of this planet is equivalent to 1 hour of a third planet, then 1 hour of it is equivalent to 1 day of fourth planet, and then equivalent to one month or one year…..etc
- i.e. the different rates of time are not found by some random machine to define any rate to any planet- instead – it defined specific rate for specific planet to create specific task – that's the aim of the different rates of time creation – it's a machine of time (A Clock)
-So, we should test our conclusions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect (II)
Paper Claim
Venus & Mars Motions Causes To Create The Moon Orbit Regression
- In the paper No. (part I) of this series, I have claimed that, Mars & Venus Motion interactive effect causes the Earth Moon orbit to regress creating a new rate of time….
i.e.
- (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day), this rate is found in the solar system out of the Earth moon orbit
- In the moon orbit the rate is (1 day of the sun = 1 year of Earth), this difference in rates is found by Venus & Mars motion effect on the moon orbit
But
- With what mechanism Venus and Mars do this effect? The data in the previous paper supports this claim strongly but no geometrical mechanism was explained in it – we have to do that in this paper
- As we know, the 1st rate of time is (1 to 86400) and the 2nd one is (1 to 365.25). so what Venus and Mars do, is to create the rate 237 which will cause the value 86400 to be equal 365.25, (237 = Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period)
- The question which this paper tries to answer is (How Venus and Mars daily motion can produce this rate 237?, shortly by what mechanism this rate is produced?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (V) (Revised)
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here use 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal Distances create different rates of time)
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here uses 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Rules
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Time and Distance Equivalence (proves)
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
The solar group is a clock (iii)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Be A Clock,
The Solar System Be A Clock?
Abstract
Paper question
Can The Solar System Be A Clock?
The question explanation
- The 1 second period of time must be different from a solar planet to another, because the 1 second period depends on the planet motion data that necessitates this period of time to be different from a planet to another.
- The solar planets motions harmony must depend on unified units.
- That necessitates to create different rates of time for the planets motions, and also necessitates these different rates of time to be complementary with one another creating one general rate of time.
- Let's use the Earth as example, Earth day =24 hours, but Earth rotation period =23.9 hours, the difference between these 2 periods forces us to divide the one day into 24 hours, and the hour into 60 minutes and into 3600 seconds.
- Means, the 1 second period depends on Earth motion data. Because of that, the 1 second period of time can't be equal period for all planets. But the planets motions general harmony hide this fact by creating one unified rate of time used by the solar system motion. that's why the solar system should be considered as a clock.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the claim and explains the clock work system.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion (II)
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Motions Concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
i.e.
Planet Motion depends on Light Motion
Or
Planet is a result of light Motion
Where
Planet & light Motion Interactions depends on this concept
1 Second Of Light Motion Causes 1 Solar Day Of Planet Motion
Which this paper tries to prove
This paper completes the discussion in the previous one
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Uranus Day Period
Paper Hypothesis
Uranus Day Period =17.2 Hours
This Value Depends On Pluto Orbital Inclination 17.2 Degrees
i.e.
Pluto Energy is transported to Uranus – This Process proves Energy Transportation through the solar group-
Based on that
Pluto Data (Energy) is seen in Uranus Data (Energy) but with different unit – where units change is one of Energy Transportation Geometrical Features
Why Energy Transportation needs to change the units? To provide the required flexibility for Energy Transportation process
Shortly…
Uranus Day Period (17.2 hours) is resulted directly from Pluto Orbital Inclination (17.2 degrees)
This hypothesis should be a direct application on my theory of Energy Transportation Through the Solar Group – and If we can prove this hypothesis – that will support the theory proves strongly
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 4)
Solar Group General Principle
Solar Group Geometrical Structure Depends On Energy Of Light Motion For 1 Second Period
Paper Hypotheses
Hypothesis No.1
Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period
Hypothesis No.2
1 second period of light motion causes the planet to move for a solar day period
Hypotheses Explanation
- The whole solar group depends on energy = light beam motion for 1 second only – that means – planets masses, diameters, orbital distances and all other data all of them are created depending the energy of 1 second motion done by light beam
- Light motion for one 1 second period provides energy enough to move the planet for a period = 1 solar day
i.e.
- The Solar Group Building Unit Depends On The Solar Day Period
This paper tries to prove this fact
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Could Plato Cave Be A Fact (IV)
The paper adds more data to prove the same concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Let's review this concept argument in following:
-Why did I suggest that "Planet Motion depends on light Motion?"
-The main reason is that
-"Planet Motion Shows Geometrical Rules And Interactions Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics"
-Planet Motion shows complex geometrical structures can't be found in the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (II)" I have provided 9 geometrical features are observed in the solar system geometry which can't be found by the rigid body motion mechanics
And
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (III)" I have provided many questions and a theoretical investigation concerning this same concept
In this paper I provide more data which can support the concept clearly
Now … If really "Planet Motion depends On Light Motion" that will explain clearly Plato cave because we see the planets motions while the light motions are found hidden behind these planets motions and because of that we are prisoners in the cave
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
,How planet velocity be defined,
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (I)
Paper Question
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Reason (Revised) (no.2).pdf
Planet Motion Reason (Revised) (No. 2)
Abstract
Paper question
How Can Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion?
Paper Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic questions need to answer which are
- (1) Can light motion effect on Planet motion?
- (2) Is there a light beam its velocity = 1.16 mkm per second?
- The following data provide the sufficient answer for these 2 questions
- Let's see this data in following:
- (1) Mercury Motion
- During 310.4s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 360 = 2π x 57.9 mkm
- During 310.4 s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 93.1 = 2π x 14.8 mkm
- Where
- 360 mkm = Mercury Orbital Circumference
- 57.9 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance
- 88 days = Mercury Orbital Period
- Mercury moves during 88 hours a distance = 15 mkm (error1.4 %)
- (2) Venus Motion
- During 586s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 680 = 2π x 108.2 mkm
- During 586s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 175.8 = 2π x 28 mkm
- Where
- 680 mkm = Venus Orbital Circumference
- 224.7 days = Venus Orbital Period
- Venus moves during 224.7 hours a distance =28.3 mkm (error1%)
- (3) Earth Motion
- During 810s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 940 = 2π x 149.6 mkm
- During 810s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 243 = 2π x 38.7 mkm
- Where
- 940 mkm =Earth Orbital Circumference
- 149.6 mkm= Earth Orbital Distance
- 365.25 days = Earth Orbital Period
- Earth moves during 365.25 hours a distance = 38.7 mkm (error 1.2%)
- (4) Mars Motion
- During 1235s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 1433 = 2π x 227.9 mkm
- During 1235s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 370.6 = 2π x 59 mkm
- Where
- 1433 mkm = Mars Orbital Circumference
- 227.9 mkm= Mars Orbital Distance
- 687 days = Mars Orbital Period
- Mars moves during 687 hours a distance = 59 mkm (error 1%)
- (5) Jupiter Motion
- During 4222.6s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 4900 = 2π x 778.6 mkm
- During 4222.6s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 1267 = 2π x 201.7 mkm
- Where
- 4900 mkm =Jupiter Orbital Circumference
- 778.6 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Distance
- 4222.6 h = Mercury Day Period
- Mercury moves during 4222.6 hours a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Jupiter moves during 4222.6 hours a distance = 201.7 mkm
- And 778.6 mkm =1.0725 x 720.7mkm
- (6) Saturn Motion
- During 7765s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 9007 = 2π x 1433 mkm
- During 7765s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 2330 = 2π x 371 mkm
- Where
- 9007 mkm = Saturn Orbital Circumference
- 1433 mkm = Saturn Orbital Distance
- 10747 days = Mars Orbital Period
- Saturn moves during 10747 hours a distance = 371 mkm (error 1%)
- (7) Uranus Motion
- During 15559s light suppose velocity (1.16 mkm/) travels 18048 = 2π x 2872 mkm
- During 15559s light known velocity (0.3 mkm/) travels 4664 = 2π x 742 mkm
- Where
- 18048 mkm = Uranus Orbital Circumference
- 2872 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance
- 30589 d
Earth motion produces the moon orbit
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper Hypothesis
- Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
That means
- Planet motion at least is a double motions – i.e. light and planet moves together
Or
- In more clear words – Plant motion is resulted from light motion –
That Means
- Light motion produces energy which planet uses for its motion – so planet motion is done depending on light motion
How to understand that??
- Is there a light beam moves with each planet?? NO
- The solar group is one machine (one train) – and there's one light beam moves and causes by his motion to move the whole solar group (the train) –
So
- Solar Planets motions are NOT several motions – on the contrary – it's only one motion – all solar planets move together in ONE Motion as a train (planets = Train carriages) – but for solar planets not all planets move by the same velocity that doesn't disprove the theory – the motion is one but the gears (Planets) move with different velocities
This paper tries to prove this fact
Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (IV)
1.There's a velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
2.Jupiter proves that "The Solar System Is One Machine"
3.The solar system is one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in this same machine.
4.Jupiter & the three inner planets are created depending on each other
5.Mars is created depending on Jupiter & Saturn cooperation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (20)
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 4)
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion - Part 4)
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
More from Gerges francis
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory.pdf
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion.pdf
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Life Depends On A Cycle.pdf
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon.pdf
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
The Sun Creation Process.pdf
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Planet Diameter Equation Analysis.pdf
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdf
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdf
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets.pdf
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation.pdf
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion.pdf
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
More from Gerges francis (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
Recently uploaded
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advancing efforts to deliver highly promising therapies to more patients.
RNA INTERFERENCE: UNRAVELING GENETIC SILENCING
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
It is useful for the Under Graduating students for easy understanding and it's useful for the exam preparations.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
This is a report about predicting property prices using SVM, random forest and gradient boosting machine
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
FAIR & AI Ready KGs for Explainable Predictions
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits: A Revolutionary
Breakthrough in Sustainable Energy Science
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Article written for leader telegram
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Recently uploaded (20)
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
Predicting property prices with machine learning algorithms.pdf
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
PRESENTATION ABOUT PRINCIPLE OF COSMATIC EVALUATION
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
In silico drugs analogue design: novobiocin analogues.pptx
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- 1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 1 Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time The Author Authorized To Be Used By Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous A Student–Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis and Theory of Functions Department) Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia Phone +201022532292 E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044 Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83 E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru Website http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024 The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –20th October 2020 Abstract Paper Claim Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time - This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following 1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion 2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion) 3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day) 4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis 5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time 6. but why we need different of time in the solar system motion? because the solar group is a machine of time (a clock), its basic task is to use energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy a planet should move for 1 solar day, so the solar group creates a general unified motion to transfer 1 second of light motion to 1 solar day of planet motion…. how?? 7. because 1 second on a planet = 1 minute on another planet = 1 hour on a third planet = 1 day on a fourth planet = 1 month on a fifth planet = 1 year on a sixth planet = 1461 days on a seventh planet….It's a clock works to transfer 1 second of time (light motion) into 1 solar day of time (planet motion)… that's why the different rates of time is the solar system basic tool to build its geometrical structure… 8. this paper provides one more example to prove this same rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
- 2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 2 1- The Rule Application (A New Example) I-Data Mercury moves during its rotation period (58.66 solar days) a distance =243 mkm Mars moves during Venus day period (116.7 solar days) a distance =243 mkm Venus rotation period =243 solar days Because Mercury Motion Distance = Mars Motion Distance = 243 mkm So must be (according to the rule) 58.66 days on Mercury = 116.7 days on Mars i.e. - If the rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) is correct, so Mars rate of time should be different from Mercury rate of time and that means, 1 solar day of Mercury Motion should be equal 1.989 solar days of Mars Motion!! - So we need to prove that, 1 solar day of Mercury Motion = 1.989 solar days of Mars Motion – - If we can prove that, the rule and the hypothesis both will be supported – so let's try to prove that in following…. II- Discussion Equation No. (I) 687 days (Mars Orbital Period) = (1.989) x 346.6 The Nodal year Where 1.989 = (116.75 /58.66) - Equation No. (I) tells that, Mars orbital period is produced by the Nodal year depending on this rate (1.989) – that means – Mars orbital period is produced by the nodal year (The Moon Orbit Regression Year) - How to understand this equation No. (I)? why this equation proves that there are 2 different rates of time between Mercury and Mars? And why these rates are useful?! - We have here 4 components which are (116.7 days Venus day period, 58.66 days mercury rotation period, 687 days Mars orbital period and 346.6 days the nodal year) But - The values (116.7 days and 58.66 days) we have brought from Mercury and Mars Motion to produce the same distance (243 mkm) which Venus uses as 243 days (Venus rotation period) i.e. - The rate 1.989 we have brought out of this equation No. (I), but this rate is used here to produce Mars orbital period based on the nodal year
- 3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 3 - We need to notice that, the moon orbit rate of time is not defined yet by our previous discussion, instead we have defined the moon motion rate of time and we have discovered that the moon synodic month 29.53 days = 1 day of Earth and also the moon orbital period 27.3 days = 1 second of light motion- as we have discussed in the previous paper –but the moon orbit rate of time isn't defined yet – and why we need to define the moon orbit rate of time?! Because the moon orbit regresses per a year 19 degrees where such motion is an unique in the solar system because no other planet orbit regresses as the moon orbit does and because of that we need to define the moon orbit regression rate of time - Equation No. (I) provides the moon orbit rate of time definition which depends on interaction of Mercury and Mars motions – Let's try to make this discussion as clear as possible in following: - Why does Equation No. (I) provide a proof for different rates of time between mercury and mars motions?! - Because it provides defined cycle periods, means the rate (1.989) which is produced by (116.7/58.66) is used by the nodal year (346.6 days) to produce mars orbital period (687 days) and this consistency supports the rule which we have tested already and this example provides more support - Have we any more proof (1.98 solar days on Mars = 1 solar day on Mercury)? Let's see the following data More Data (A) 7 deg (Mercury orbital inclination) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) + 5.1 deg (the moon orbital inclination) (B) 97 degrees = 19 deg (=the moon regress yearly) x 5.1 deg (the moon orb. inclination) Where (97 degrees = 90 degrees +7 degrees Mercury orbital inclination) Also (97 degrees = 97.8 deg Uranus axial tilt – 0.8 deg Uranus orbital inclination) (C) 30589 days (Uranus orbital period) = 88 days (Mercury orbital period) x 347.6 days (346.6 days = The Nodal Year – error less than 0.3%) (D) 97.8 deg (Uranus Axial Tilt) = 26.7 degrees (Saturn Axial Tilt) x 3.66 (116.7 degrees = 26.7 degrees +90 degrees) (E) 180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus Axial Tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)
- 4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 4 More Discussion - The previous data shows clearly Uranus effect on the moon orbit creation, this effect which is shown by Venus effect on the moon orbit… - Shortly Venus is Uranus strong arm to effect directly on the moon orbit and causes its regression – and because of that – the nodal year is seen in Uranus orbital period – - Venus strong effect (always) be seen through Saturn data where 26.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt) can be seen as 116.7 degrees = 26.7 deg +90 deg (Saturn axial tilt vertically) and can be used as 116.7 days (Venus day period) which is used in the equation No. (I) (Note Please, (116.7 = Saturn Mass / Venus Mass)) For more detailed discussion Please review Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II) Session https://www.academia.edu/s/b7f22d3a45 or https://www.academia.edu/44334645/Can_Different_Rates_Of_Time_Be_Found_In_ The_Solar_System_Motion_II_ or https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-different-rates-of-time-be-found-in-the- solar-system-motionii Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in- planet-motion or https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion session https://www.academia.edu/s/69edd1d0ea
- 5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawadrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 5 References Matter Origin and Creation https://www.academia.edu/43214351/Matter_Origin_and_Creation Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? (II) https://www.academia.edu/43197587/Is_Saturn_The_Last_Planet_Created_In_The_Solar_System_II_ Is There A Parallel Universe (I) https://www.academia.edu/43150627/Is_There_A_Parallel_Universe Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis) https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134 Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005) http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119 List of publications on Google Scholar List of publications on ZentralBlatt https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317 http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425 http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014 http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina Full list of publications: http://web-local.rudn.ru/web- local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209 Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044 E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/ ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous